When it seems there is a cover up of military experiments some believe responsible for accidental time travel and teleportation… to include the possibility of sponsoring the Mandela Effect’s alternate timeline realities… thus establishing two different but intertwined conspiracy theories, each with their own cover up… I’m extra suspicious. And, with good cause, it seems.
Dateline, Aug, 29, 2020, from a mobile TV studio at an undisclosed locationcopyright © 2020, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.
Rod, we need you…
Imagine if you will, the audio intro to The Twilight Zone. Only Mr. Serling is nowhere to be found… in our current timeline. And, given the nature of this special real-life episode, in which everyone reading this post is onstage and playing a roll, we might just need him to help us work through putting this particular show together. It might properly be entitled, The Mandela Effect, and if to learn some useful truth along the way, Rod might hint in his introduction, that it “has to do with something called the Philadelphia and Montauk Experiments… in the Twilight Zone.”
The term ‘Mandela Effect’ (hereinafter, often referred to simply as the Effect), is derived by the first noted instance of the Effect, regarding the South African anti-apartheid activist, Nelson Mandela. When it was announced that Nelson was released from prison in 1990… untold millions of people began commenting that they were certain they had heard/read news reports of his death in prison, in the early 80’s… for which no one could find evidence of such death notices. At the time.
Over time, as other events in his life made international news, more and more people began to say much the same, in some cases, citing other time frames for his death. So many people, in fact, that a seeming cover up effort began to emerge, a matter which will play a role in this particular script, as it evolves. Fortunately, as it happens, at least one Fan of the old black and white TV show happens to be a ‘conspiracy theorist’ willing to stand in for Rod. And he… err… rather I, am ready and able to attempt filling in, with my own not-so-insignificant investigative writing efforts and findings.
For my qualifications in such an effort, may I submit my RAP Sheet of crimes and conspiracies solved or thwarted. Here, in this post, I start with a brief summary of the how and why of my efforts, which led to a means for testing for the validity of the Effect, quite contrary to tremendous efforts to dismiss it as ‘mind tricks some people play on themselves.’ In doing so, I also show significant relevance to the U.S. Navy’s Project Rainbow, better known as the 1943 Philadelphia Experiment, which allegedly caused a WWII Destroyer, the U.S.S. Eldridge and crew, to both travel in time, and teleport between multiple locations.
There are two motion pictures about the Experiment, sharing its name, but only the 1984 version is worth a watch… presuming the viewer realizes it is a fictionalized presentation. The 2012 TV version, is not only badly done, but it is so fictionalized as to anger anyone who knows anything about the legend, be it through the first movie, or any actual researched source. What the movies leave out, is that Nicholas Tesla and other famous Einstein-caliber scientists (including Einstein), have variously been linked to the Experiments, in one way or another. In fact, in the final proofs this script leads to, if you choose to follow it, we find modern scientists who essentially verify a lot of that, and who validate the science behind the Experiments… including a reference to a little known WWII era radar-defeating experiment by the Third Reich.
Note: that little tidbit should get the attention of anyone who follows the Nazi UFO/underground base in Antartica conspiracy theories, given that many of the same principles described in early anti-gravity theory were also present in the technology claimed present in the Eldridge and Montauk saga.
While in this author’s view, the cover up of the Effect is not much more than psyops disinformation, there is a significantly more complex cover up in play, on the cited Experiments (hereinafter, also capitalized to represent all such events), themselves. The intensity of the coverup has, in fact, more than kept pace with interest in the Effect, as more and more people take note. Restated, the more people become aware of the Effect, and especially if exploring possible ties to Experiments, someone was insuring that ‘the explanation’ is even more ‘available,’ in an attempt to dampen their fervor in trying to figure things out for themselves. It has transformed from mere disinformation, to full-blown cover-up dirty tricks and psyops.
Sorry, (Men in Black), but I’m rather impervious to such forms of artificial moisture.
Dirty tricks and psyops? As with all really well-done cover ups (i.e., Flight 800 shoot down, JFK assassinations, 9-11 false flag), the very facts and evidence behind the Experiment theories are being deliberately contaminated with sets of conflicting evidence and testimony. These are being established within various narratives to make it impossible for the average person to know if any of it, is true. This is augmented by being pointed out as disino-style straw man ‘debunking.’
For example, the actual location of the 1943 test is variously and additionally described in the effort, over time, as actually taking place in (and/or teleporting between) Philadelphia, New York, and Portsmouth/Norfolk, VA… all while the ship was allegedly actually at sea in a shake-down cruise. This is the hallmark of all good cover ups; alternative versions of the story, by means of fabricated, altered, or concealed evidence. One other clue which renders them suspected cover up efforts, is that collectively, each seems a de facto denial of the remarkable experiment results, altogether.
There was, in time, even a parallel Project Rainbow being run simultaneously by CIA and Lockheed, aimed at developing radar stealth technology, such as we see in the F111 fighter and other aircraft, today. Duplicate-sounding programs is another means of confusing and concealing facts from inquisitive minds, and it wouldn’t be the first such duplicate employed in the evolving saga. If there were no remarkable results in 1943, why so much effort to obscure with alternative versions of the tale? The effort over time drew in more and more, and wilder and wilder additional conspiracy theories completely unrelated to the original event… everything from mind control, abductions and child abuse, to government deals with intergalactic aliens and teleportation to Mars. Suddenly, it sounds more like TV’s Star Gate, than Twilight Zone.
Ironically, perhaps… despite the many attempts to confuse and defuse, has not quite worked out as intended. All those alternate versions can and have been argued by the faithful believers… as ALL being true, by virtue of the Experiments having created alternate realities — exactly why the Experiments are suspected as causing the alternate timelines of the Mandela Effect, in the first place. Thus… the legend grows with every twist and turn added, be it by coverup, or by daring to dig deeper, such as done by the earlier mentioned scientists seeking to verify validity of the claimed Experiment technology. Argh! How do we discover the truth in this vast sea of complex and contradictory information?
Not to worry; the show gives us roughly an hour’s script, within which the truth may yet be found…
Is the episode to be mere fiction, or based on fact?
Make no mistake: because of the extensive nature of the cover up, ‘alleged’ is the correct word for virtually anything online relating to the topic, thus far. Hopefully, this will change that, and make it easier to find one’s way through the distortions to the truth hidden within. Because, here and now, it becomes a matter for you to decide, based on new proofs, herein described. The good news is, the Mandela Effect itself becomes the key to the greater U.S.S. Eldridge saga… and vice versa, in mutually reinforcing ways. Both share newly discovered and consistent patterns which more than suggests Experiments indeed have a causal nature to the Effects. This will also lead to a plausible theory as to how teleportation may also indeed fit into and be part of the correct view of the entire episode. The Network Studio Executives, would be proud, and advertisers, pleased.
More astute followers of the Philadelphia theories know there is some evidence which alleges that Rainbow research quietly resumed in 1948, likely leading to renewed Experiments in 1960 at Brookhaven Laboratories, in central Long Island. Under the new codename of Phoenix (in time dubbed Phoenix I and II), it seems it may have continued almost yearly until 1976, under a US Air Force and Navy partnership. Next, they were relocated to Montauk Air Force Station, at the tip of Long Island, at what would become a largely underground complex known today as Camp Hero. Preparations for the move were underway as early as 1973, because of a need for a larger radar system which would make the top-secret research too obvious, at Brookhaven.
Note: True to form, for much of this period, CIA was running another Project Phoenix simultaneously with the US Army, in Vietnam; an assassination program from within which would evolve the two top people first put in charge of Homeland Security, once formed.
Like the Philadelphia Experiment, Montauk, and all related experiments were allegedly shut down in 1983 — after things went terribly wrong, and conclusively believed co-causal in the 1943 Eldridge event — not to mention the alleged teleportation of some kind of terribly powerful monster from another (world? dimension? time?). Remarkably telling, the Montauk monster release took place on the exact same date as the Philadelphia Experiment, exactly 40 years later… creating a time-tunnel, or sorts, between the two dates and locations. These events allegedly led to all experiments being shut down.
Between those two dates, however, more than a dozen different Experiment dates have variously been discussed among Web resources and books on topic. I selected the ten most compelling, and with success of early testing and by additional deduction, I have proposed a two other dates which I hoped could be shown valid by fitting into any observed patterns. They do fit. Technically, it was possible and even likely that experiments of some sort took place every year, often several times a year, post 1960 Brookhaven.
I also point to clues that Area 51 has for some time been operating equipment which fits the Rainbow~Montauk technical descriptions very closely, things evidenced with Google Earth’s 3-D building’s feature (not official; created by followers of the Area 51 mythos, generating and updating 3-D GE compatible constructs alleged to be based on rare photographs and eye-witness verbal descriptions, over time). Thus, it at least seems, experiments may have continued post 1983, as well, which may account for the bulk of Mandela’s death dates to be beyond the 1983 date, and as recent as 2013.
Google Earth: 37°14’4.04″N 115°48’16.60″W 3-D Buildings and Terrain turned on
Handed the script while on another project…
I did not set out to do any of this. I was aware of and have experienced the Mandela Effect, myself, both with respect to his Death, as well as other, less significant things of the ‘mind trick’ variety. The (cover up) ‘mind trick’ explanations typically involve words or spelling issues, such as names of things in media or pop culture; Chic-fil-A vs. Chick-fil-A, Sex in the City vs. Sex and the City, etc. These things have become strawmen easy for disinforming cover up efforts to ‘shoot down’ the Effect as mere memory recall errors playing tricks on our mind in some kind of mental placebo-or mass-hysteria tom foolery. Such explanations are themselves mind tricks, and work only because no one can come forward with hard proof in the form of an original date where an event or item can be shown to have been changed in our conciousness, as well as demonstrable factual proof beyond history’s official version.
Happily, such cases do exist.
My first discovery of such proofs, which led to finding others, came about because I was writing my autobiography (I am, after all, ‘semi-famous,’ if you didn’t know — 14M pages reference me or my works). I wanted the best accuracy I could manage with respect to various experiential details, especially if relating to truly famous people I have been involved with. That meant research, and one such item researched happened to regard legendary Olympic swimming record breaker, Mark Spitz. All I wanted to do was to verify the number of Medals he had already won when I first met him, a thing we spoke of, at the time. But what I found in addition, was that it couldn’t have happened, at all, if believing the current history timeline… it was some kind of time-travel paradox!
On December 29, 1963, just as the extra severe Winter blizzard that would pummel the central U.S. all they way to the Gulf Coast was starting to roar, I spent four days on a train trip to Texas, from Oregon. The storm covered most of the nation in deep, wind-driven snow, and the train indeed had to, at times, run with a snow-blowing engine ahead of it. Quite by chance, I was seated part of the way next to Olympic champion swimmer, Mark Spitz, only because the heating failed in several of the cars, and everyone was herded into the two cars with at least some heat, where seating options were limited. We chatted, both as ‘ice breaker,’ and to while the hours away in an unscheduled layover in Denver, while they addressed the heat, so that Denver passengers could board, and travel in warm safety.
I immediately knew who the fellow I shared a seat with was by his pictures in the newspaper, for having recently won four different medals in international pre-Olympic competition a few months earlier — the very details I sought to verify at Wikipedia, for my book. He confirmed it, himself; we talked specifically about that and related matters for some time… as the windows were frosted over and there was no scenery to enjoy. The reason for his trip, was related, something to do with training, and his goal to win Gold at the Olympics. He would do that, in time, winning more than anyone else, ever had, and I would follow his career with great interest, because of having met him.
TODAY, however, the official online history says he didn’t win his first medals until 1965, and that when he did, he was three years younger than I was in that same year. In our trip, he was a year OLDER, which meant he was born in 1945, instead of 1950, as officially so, today. That makes a five-year error in his birth date, and a two year error in his first Gold medals date, from 1963. It was impossible for me to have recognized him for medals he had yet to win, and I know when our trip was, the only time I’ve taken a train to Texas… as I was to live with my Aunt and Uncle while my parents worked through their divorce, and to finish my Senior year, there. I did graduate from Hardin-Jefferson High School in 1964, and then returned to Oregon, by air. The date of the trip was defined by Christmas school vacation, and such that my arrival date would allow quick enrollment in the 1964 school year, in Texas.
The paradox hit me hard. It led me to wonder what else in my life might suffer the Effect. I quickly researched the details in other matters for which dates could be verified. I indeed encountered two other examples for which I was able to know the original date because of personal experiences, and the current timeline historical date, both turning out to be mutually exclusive and yet paradoxically so. These are recounted fully in the linked (at post bottom) Study material, which is the ultimate proof, as herein referenced… validating the Experiments, the Effect, and causality.
The plot thickens…
But documenting these would not be enough; my personal experiences cannot be well proven to a Doubting Thomas; it could be dismissed as something made up, or misremembered. I still needed things I could prove with hard evidence, rather than personal testimony, alone. And that’s when I started to investigate Mandela’s death in hopes of finding such proofs. In the attempt, I was able to prove for once and for all, that he did not die twice, as believed.
No. There is, in fact, rather convincing evidence which seems to show that he has died four times, one of which, was a murder. Most people recall his earlier death as being in the early 80s, with no way to prove it. Others in the mid 80’s, with no proof, some recalling it was a murder. A few remember 1991, with no evidence. His current timeline death, is cited as Dec 5, 2013. But now, various proofs do exist which would seem to validate everyone’s memory, and refute all the faulty memory or hysteria mind-trick ‘explanations’ which serve to cover up the truth. But there are two additional things true about them. For one, each has an inherent problem which would certainly seem to neutralize them as evidence. But the other, is that the very nature of that problem is, under the theory, itself called into question as to actual meaning.
In fact, if the other proofs revealed herein, were correct, they would HAVE to be the way they are, and serve as their own kind of ‘reverse logic proofs’ in an ironic manner. They validate on the surface, self-repudiate on close examination, and self-validate when fully informed, yet again. These verifications and proofs for each, are briefly described as follows, in the order in which I found them, but the repudiation and self-validation will be covered later in this work, where it will be easier and make more sense:
• A 1983 high-school report about Mandela helps fix a death date of March 11, 1983. The Report was assigned because of his Death, that year, and the aftermath of political upheaval it had promoted. As of yet, there are no photographs, and arguably, such would be easy to fake, and the source is easily discounted as unathoritative; several online comments by the student, now an adult. These were in chat rooms, for which a link is pointless. The date, however, will check out, in the Study, and is therefore included.
• Next, a South African periodical, published Oct 1, 1991, includes remarking about his 1991 death, and the reader can verify, directly at Google Books. The small book is a collection of S.A. student English language writings published serially each year. Subsequent editions, therefore, no longer have the reference, a matter also verifiable towards the bottom of the same mentioned link, where other years are also listed. Be aware that Google Books for some reasons includes material from both the 1990 and 1991 editions when searching, and does not enable the user to scan up and down. I have, however, obtained the full text, after a great deal of effort, and can confirm it comes from the 1991 edition.
• Finally, a follow-up Northwest Herald newspaper story via a cell phone streaming service was captured in screen shots which reveal Mandela’s murder in 1985. There are several online images found in chat rooms and the like, and a very short and creepy YouTube. This has been verified by a reputable national newspaper historical repository (newspapers.com). Access requires a paid subscription to the service, it being intended for serious researchers. Again, I have managed to access the full article, and the image is legitimate. The video shows multiple views at various scroll points within the document, to reveal more details… but offers no explanations, just creepy music and unpleasant visual effects. This is the best image taken from it, to save you the grief.
The show is ready to air… cue music; stand by, Mr. Serling…
I therefore set about to catalog all dates into a Study group spreadsheet, with calculations as to years between dates, to look for patterns. Along with that, a duplicate Control group based on dates randomly created by Excel’s randbetween Function was used to look for similarities in any evolved patterns found in the Study, which would prove or disprove the notion of coincidences in said patterns. And Study patterns did evolve, eight different observable patterns***, in fact… and the Control group had not one useful pattern. In fact, where some patterns did not quite seem to fit, a closer look revealed spreadsheet or data typo errors. In the end, the entire effort, from establishing dates by research to creation of the spreadsheets, was repeated and double checked countless times.
The principal goal, of course, was to not only to prove the Effect was real, but to attempt to verify the causal source. As mentioned, the Experiments were the principal suspects, but also, there were secondary suspects in CERN experiments, and in experiments involving Artificial Intelligence… specifically, the qubit computer systems by D-Wave. Unfortunately, for such suspects, very little information is known about their dates of operation.*** Regardless, findings were telling, and useful, and should lead the reader to wish to delve into the details of the Study effort, which can be done at the links beneath the findings.
Preview of Findings
Findings quite contrary to the Control Group were examined, broken into the following topical descriptions of individual findings, as taken directly from the Study. Each of which contributes to the validity of the fuller hypothesis by establishing patterns and/or relationships which also may provide clues as to the how and why of causality. Unfamiliar terms are definable characteristics of the resulting patterns, as discovered.
Bookends have Repeating Numbers: the key-most Bookends all share common separations in years between dates (repetitive numbers), which reveal patterns;
Midpoint Self-Pointing Patterns: while 1963 is an obvious Midpoint, which itself thereby becomes bookends to two halves of the greater Eldridge event years, there are many other Midpoints, select of which form circular self-pointing patterns between them.
Path-Finding Pointers: universally, the repetitive numbers in the Study group become Pointers which establish paths to the same two destination years, which in turn, point to each other;
Midpoints Pointers reveal causality clues: these clues can be visually represented as kind of ‘genetic code’ to understanding how an Midpoint Experiment or Effect might cause an original event date to shift to its current official event date;
Experiment dates vs. non Experiment dates: there is a marked difference between dates with and without Experiments. The one exception;
Pointers different between forward and backward time shifts: each forward shift shares a specific Pointer commonality, while the only backward shift has a unique and exclusive Pointer difference;
Precise dating patterns: when the full Effects and Experiment dates are known, they reveal exactly one year, or one year plus six months between, leading to a new hypothesis regarding the ‘mechanics’ of Experiment timeline shifts which result.
The results of the findings led to the following conclusions:
- Key Event dates which lay entirely within the range of known Experiments, and which fall on the same dates as Experiements, establish a common pattern between them, implying a causal relationship may exist;
- All other Event dates, and Experiment dates, not sharing a common dating, still do exhibit the same patterns, providing high confidence in a causal relationship;
- Because AI and CERN experiment dates cannot be known, neither can neither be proven or disproven as being causal to either the Event or Death dates evaluated, at this time;
- While the dating of Mandela’s deaths lay outside of the known Experiment dates, several of the patterns nonetheless exist in their dating, and relate them to the Experiments usefully, and yet, leave room to suspect that other forces may also be causal, such as CERN, or AI, or perhaps continued experiments elsewhere, such as at Area 51;
- No patterns of like kind were observed in the randomized Control Group, validating the Study patterns as non coincidental or random happenstance, in nature;
- The patterns observed, do collectively and mutually validate one-another as strong indicators of the overall Findings’ validity;
- The patterns allowed confirmation of suspected Experiment dates for Brookhaven 6 (1968), and 8 (1972), as fitting the patterns, when added to the Study group for comparison, and refuted other dates born of ‘what if’ theories developed along the way;
- The patterns revealed a difference in a detail of their nature between Events shifted forward in time, compared to Events shifted backwards in time, thereby providing clues potentially useful in eventual understanding of how the distance and length of time shifts are established;
- The patterns observed also revealed a curiosity; in that Event pair (original and current timeline) dates are, with one curious exception, always exactly apart by (n) years, to the day, or (n) years + six months, exactly to the day, resulting in additional theories about causality, as described in the Study;
- Therefore, the Mandela Effect is demonstrated to be real, and its cause is demonstrated to be due the suspected Experiments.
Self-repudiation and yet also self-validating?
If one reviews the Study and finds it compelling, the problems mentioned within the details of the Mandela Death ‘proofs,’ can be understood in ways which render self-repudiation moot. The problems in the proofs are individually unique, and will prove fascinating, in the manner in which they both self-repudiate, and yet, self-validate. The self-validation, which neutralizes the repudiation, remains the same for all, and will be offered in the closing paragraphs. In the end, however, it is also true that the Mandela deaths have no impact on the Study, as they fall outside of the suspect Experiments dating, or fall on dates of such experiments; removing them altogether from consideration does not alter the Study findings in any consequential way. The same Findings would still be similarly arrived at, with the same level of confidence.
The student’s chat room comments about his homework papers are self repudiating simply because it is (thus far) impossible to reach him, to seek a copy of his paperwork from high school days, and because it would be easy to fake hand or type-written school report materials. People fake things on the Web constantly, thinking it great sport to be so ‘clever,’ to presume a hoodwinking lie somehow equates to intelligence.
The book quote proves problematic, because once you acquire the full text of the three page article, we learn that it is part of a fictional speech, entitled, ‘His Closing Speech.’ Within it, many historical events are referenced, several with precise dates, and all but two prove to be completely accurate. I’m not including Mandela’s death date in either category, for the moment, and the two which do not seem accurate, have the potential of being accurate, as each may be simply a different way to reference events which did take place, but are described in different terms than perhaps commonly used in the day, by locals, as opposed to the official national/international narratives. The paper, however, starts with the sentence “In our minds, let’s go ahead exactly one year in time…” After a short soliloquy, the ‘speech’ begins, a speech by someone revealed in the last paragraph, to be a judge, about to pass sentence on former South African President William de Klerk, for crimes of apartheid. Also, in the closing lines, we get a date which, if the ‘exactly one year in time’ is explicitly correct, indicates that the article was written or presented on 15, March, 1991. But the piece, looking back from the ‘future’ on 23, July, 1991. This self-repudiates the date as being historically correct.
The newspaper article, once you acquire the full article, self-repudiates, because when you have the full sentence, you see that well placed commas reveal that Nelson Mandela was not among those found murdered on the road, but some other unfortunate anti-apartheid activist, and friends. It reads, emphasis added: “UDF organizer Matthew Goniwe, hailed by blacks as possibly the most important dissident leader since jailed African National Congress President Nelson Mandela, was found murdered along a rural road in June.” False grammar assumptions killed Nelson Mandela, it seems. Whoever originally posted this find, is likely one of those ‘intelligent’ liars, seeking to deliberately deceive.
How do these self-repair their repudiation? I’ll start my explanation by repeating something I heard a famous scientist say, once. My wife and I, when I was a successful business man able to afford the $250 tickets, would attend a series of lectures by famous scientists and other brilliant minds in various fields of endeavor… something akin to Ted Talks, today. After each, there was a reception party, and these were variously attended by other scientists and minds of like kind, giving us a chance to mingle among them and engage in stimulating conversations. One such attendee, a physics professor, said something along the lines of this: “All of nature, as describable in physics and other fields of science, contains the very clues of its own explanation for being, hidden in plain sight, awaiting only the ingenuity of Man and his ability to test and measure, to discover the truth of it.” The guest speaker, himself a Physicist, as I recall, agreed.
To me, this means that if there is an alternate and paradoxical timeline created by some aberration, there will be some form of a clue within the paradox, itself, which can lead one to the discovery, and proof of it. This perfectly fits with the general view, that in order for a timeline shift to take place, the very nature of the resulting paradox MUST alter all documents which reference any historically noted differences between the two timelines. It must do so in some way which both accounts for them, and yet refutes the differences. Therefore, it would make perfect sense that some aspects of the former, would be contained, and yet be altered in alternative accountings of the later. This means, that if the Study as linked, herein, adequately proves the basic contention that the Mandela Effect dates are not random in nature, but establish patterns which validate them in some way which simultaneously ties them to, and validates the causal hypothesis… then the very existence of self-repudiating proofs floating to the surface, self validates them once more, and neutralizes the repudiation. I am satisfied that it does, pending someone proving otherwise.
In summary, I am putting forth the hypothesis that these remain clues to the Mandela Effect which bolster people’s memories usefully. But regardless of if that be correct, or not, it does not alter the findings of the Study: the Effect is real, there are multiple timelines, and the cause is identified.
But like all episodes of the Twilight Zone… not every viewer walks away with the same appreciation of the presentation. So, if you have never experienced anything along the lines of the Mandela Effect, and/or otherwise remain unconvinced… you may prefer to watch Outer Limits, instead, where the Matrix tells you, “We are controlling transmission…” and admonishes you not to adjust your set, because the Matrix wants you to believe in and follow it, and not think for or believe in yourself.