Blog Archives

Who’s Killing the Bilderbergers?


Some 17 years ago, the Unified Conspiracy Theory was formulated. It was so accurate — it was able to predict in 1999 the 2001 downing of the WTC by jetliners and resulting Middle East Oil Wars, and other major news events. Now it can be seen at work in my newest book on the Bilderbergers — where fact and fiction collide… fatally.

 

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2016, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or link to original posting.
 
Upate Feb. 20, 2017 Paranoia Publishing is set to start shipping hard cover copies of this book as early as first week of March. Amazon will carry it right away. ebook copies available direct from author now at half price ($6 – will return to normal price once hard copy is available) via paypal orders to proparanoidgroup at gmail com. 

What led to this book? The definitive International conspiracy.

After ten years of research into crimes of the New World Order, I began to theorize that the bulk of America’s dark bumps in the night were not simply random crimes by assorted forces for varied agenda, but completely orchestrated as a single, logical, step-wise plan toward a single, yet visible goal. It resulting in the Unified Conspiracy Theory, and it was reasoned that if one knew the goal, and the steps thus far taken, such a plan was predictable, and as a theory, the ultimate test would be to do just that.

The first three predictions made with the UCT were so scary, that I had to take actions, do something… anything I could think of, to attempt to thwart them. The first was, that some kind of terror event would bring down the WTC with jetliners, and result in a series of Middle East Oil Wars. So, in the Fall of 1999, knowing no authorities would bother to respond usefully, or quickly, I published a quickly written screenplay featuring such a plot, and put it online with explanative warnings, hoping against hope it might force any such plan to be aborted. No such luck, of course, even though Oliver Stone’s people took a look at the script in search of a project. They thought it an impossible ‘false flag’ scenario.

 

16819237_985524731587546_4614382031226083422_o.jpg

The second UCT prediction was an assassination attempt on 1992 Independent Presidential Candidate H. Ross Perot, or his family, in order to force him out of the Primary run against Clinton/Bush. I took no chances, and this time, notified the Secret Service of my concerns, expecting they would ask me for details. I used my backchannel contact, someone I had worked with before on several Treasury matters. Some several weeks later, Perot did back out of the election, even though the very night he did so, he had won enough votes to be guaranteed a place on the General Ballot. A few weeks after that, my SS contact confirmed that an attempt had been made just before the Primary, against his family; mailed Anthrax. That has its own telling ‘false flag’ backstory.

The third was that there would be at least two more major false flag attacks to follow, specifically naming the type of attacks, and the cities. One of them was my home town, which I had predicted would suffer a bio-terror attack, and I even identified the means of delivery and rogue CIA Fronts to be used. But by the time frame where that might become a more current concern, I had finished my book set, Fatal Rebirth, which spelled these things out quite clearly, again hoping it might spoil any such plan. I also took steps to notify the City.

Again, no useful results, but fortunately, knowing such details enabled me to personally thwart that attack, or at least postpone it. It is featured on this Blog’s home page.  But I was definitely able to thwart second, different terror attack in the same time frame, likely a Plan B to the former. It was called Gas Station Tasking when announced by President Bush; the use of private planes to dive bomb the area’s largest gas station while a tanker truck was offloading gasoline, at the busiest time of the street traffic day. This is also detailed on the home page.

This could easily have taken out two gas stations, four restaurants, two banks, two two hotels, and potentially, two major shopping complexes, and the traffic on the busiest intersection in the County, plus a major Interstate and two State highways. Identified, were two of FBI’s Top Ten Most Wanted Terrorists, and others, including the Christmas Tree Bombers. They were getting help from an FBI Agent known to me, and so, as it was a false flag operation, FBI, CIA, FAA, DHS, in response to my going public, never asked for my evidence, which included fingerprints, video, multiple eye witness confirmations, and more. The cover up was started before the President even heard about it. See home page.

 

Why UTC matters to this new book

Other UTC predictions have since come to pass, as well. The reason this is all mentioned here, at all, is because the UTC does not just affect America, it relates perfectly to World affairs, as well. And in this world, we have various Round Table Groups of Globalists who push for a One-World Government, which is to say, elements of the modern-day Illuminati. Such groups as the Tri-Lateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Grandaddy of them all, the Bilderbergers, and many more (even United Nations, World Bank, et. al), all tend to be cut from the same New World Order mold.

suiciding-the-bankers

This image relates to one of two strings of real World International murders footnoted in Who’s Killing The Bilderbergers, as cited in this book. From http://humansarefree.com/2016/06/mainstream-media-finally-admits-mass.html

 

Which in turn is to say, largely fascist, all-too often satanic, and decidedly power elitists seeking to rule the World through manipulation and control of (everything), and willing to do so at any cost, by any means. Not to go overboard, it is important to note that, with the exception of the Bilderbergers, most Round Table Groups, like FreeMasonry, attempt to draw in newbie membership who are completely innocent Sheep. This gives surface viability and credibility of these groups to mainstream in ways which allow them to mask the darker roles they play in seeking the Globalist rule, while also giving fresh students to draw into their world, especially the more successful up and comers. There is a backstory there, as well, as I have first hand knowledge, x 2 telling examples, having been such an up and coming business man.

Ergo, this new book is designed to do much the same thing as Fatal Rebirth; to warn you just what these people are doing, and why… and why you should be mad as hell about it and doing something to stop them. Only, my new book is global in scope, where Fatal Rebirth concerned itself only with America. And, while Fatal Rebirth began unfolding in 1947, Who’s Killing the Bilderbergers is a current-day affair. As such, it is perhaps more urgent, that you read it, and soon — because the future is revealed to be bleaker than the Dark Ages and time of the Inquisition, for those not forewarned and forearmed.

 

The plot thickens

I describe this book as ‘an International Novel of Novel International Affairs.’ A grand murder mystery across multiple Continents, trying to resolve mysterious death after death of prominent Globalist leaders. Are they simply random deaths by happenstance, or murders by elaborate design? Officially, they are not due foul play, and yet… each one has many unanswerable questions clouding that view. Just as troubling, their deaths seem to be tied to various strange conspiracy theories, while at the same time tied to various Globalist agenda, either narrative affording motive for murder. And, of course, it is soon enough discovered that they all turn out to be Bilderbergers.

bilderberg.jpg

Each Bilderberger tends to be an Officer or Board Member of multiple corporations, and has sway over yet others through major stock holder positions, or contractual agreements. Of course, many of these companies, in turn, control other companies, sometimes, long lists. Now, imagine what this Cloud Map would look like if we knew the actual identity of ALL Bilderbergers, and not just this handful. Then add CFR, Trilateral Commission, Club of Rome, Council on Foreign Relations, and on, and on; the Round Table Globalists; the modern-day illuminati.

By the time the truth of the deaths starts to be uncovered, the UTC will have started to reveal itself in action. In like manner to UTC’s ability to be predictive, readers will be propelled quickly into the future, headlong into the one final prediction which is the ultimate form of fatal rebirth… for us all. That particular prediction WILLmost certainly come to pass; it has, after all, been foretold by many authors well before my time. Among them, Satanist and high Mason, Adam Weishaupt; it is the entire purpose of and predictive goal of the Illuminati Plan, as he formulated it in 1776, when the group started their journey toward a New World Order (he first coined that term).

As this book reveals, just when it comes to pass, is largely up to you. You, are what you’ve been waiting for. They hope you don’t know that, and remain Sheeple.

 

An important detail

And, along the way to that story-ending element, readers will also encounter countless real-World conspiracies laid at the feet of Bilderbergers, all done in ways which let the individual decide for his or herself, which, if any, may seem fanciful, and which are more likely true.  There is much documentation within the main body, plus more than 150 footnotes (an average of one every page turn), to help that process along. Some of those footnotes are illustrated graphically. The Climax and Ending will then show you the progressional nature of the Globalist plan as it unfolds toward the very last step in the plan, the point of no return for Mankind. These conspiracies back up the UTC usefully, and in fact, understanding them helps refine the UTC more usefully; one tends to validate the other, in both directions.

 

 

 

Terrorist H. Michael Sweeney’s RAP Sheet


OK, it’s true. There are at least a half-dozen ways the government can ‘claim’ I’m a terrorist. YOU TOO, for that matter. But I have a Record of Arrest and Prosecution ‘sheet’ to illustrate one of the ways I am definitely a terrorist to someone, including people that think I’m merely a conspiracy theorist. I am not ‘mere,’ at anything I do…

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   proparanoidpress.com   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2016, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Please comment any such repost to original posting.

 

What makes you a terrorist when you live in a Police State?

Simple answer: anything you do. There have been so many Constituion trampling Acts of Congress and Executive Orders, all so vaguely worded as to allow the broadest of interpretations, that it is almost just that easy for someone in government to label YOU (and certainly me) a terrorist. That can have very unfortunate consequences, depending on who labels you, why, and what they do about it. You can end up on the no fly list, or some kind of watch list, or even be vanished forever by Men in Black whisking you off in a black van.

One such example is, that being a conspiracy theorist automatically makes you a terrorist according to FBI. That’s bluntly stated, but true, as an article at Public Intelligence illustrates: “A flyer from a series created by the FBI and Department of Justice to promote suspicious activity reporting states that espousing conspiracy theories or anti-US rhetoric should be considered a potential indicator of terrorist activity. ” The flyer, linked in the article, specifically includes 9-11 Truthers (that’s about 1/3 of the U.S. population).

OK; I’m a conspiracy theorist, or if you prefer, a Conspiracy Terrorist. But I am no ordinary ‘theorist,’ because I have a R.A.P. sheet… a Record of Arrests and Prosecutions. And here it is, below the FBI Fellon ID Card (which shows that not even FBI always gets the right man)… but be sure to read the summary text before you wonder why I’m still walking around freely.

hmswanted

R.A.P. Sheet, H.Michael Sweeney

1976  Wire Tapping, 2 counts, charges dropped for insufficient evidence

1980  Embezzling, charges dropped after resignation from company

1983  Counterfeiting, Drug Smuggling, sentenced

1984  Wire Tapping, charges dropped for insufficient evidence

1985  Shoplifting, 4 counts, sentenced

1987  Fraud, Embezzling (pretending to be a Pastor), Bad Checks, charges dropped after restitution

1988  Wire Fraud, 3 counts, sentenced

1988  Smuggling, 2 counts (bioweapons, diamonds), sentenced

1990  Espionage, Interception of Electronic Communications, charges dropped by NSA intervention

1991  Bank Robbery, 4 counts, sentenced

1991  Wire Tapping, 4 counts, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

1992  Fraud, 3 counts, Witness Tampering, 3 counts, Withholding Evidence, 2 counts, Murder,

            cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

1993  Breaking and Entering, 2 counts, Grand Theft, charges dropped after restitution

1994  Wire Tapping, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

1994  Attempted Murder, 12 counts, case turned over to Internal Affairs, and dropped

1996  Espionage, 3 counts, Violation of Civil Rights, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

1998  Wire Tapping, Stalking, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

1998  Grand Theft Auto, Operating Chop Shop, 3 counts, sentenced

1999  Possession of Controlled Substance with Intent to Sell, sentenced

2001  Bioterrorism, Attempted Assassination, investigation closed by DOJ intervention

2002  Terrorism, 4 counts, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

2004  Bioterrorism, case closed due to lack of evidence

2004  Cyberterrorism, Hacking (of CIA’s Web site), charges dropped in exchange for services rendered

2016  Armed Robbery, 2 counts, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

2016  Bank Robbery, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

 

Summary Judgement

By now, if you actually read the full list, you realize no one person could be guilty of all those crimes and still be walking free… and that there were crimes on the list immediately after incarceration, and no jail breaks to account for that. This is because these are not crimes that I committed, but crimes I have investigated and exposed, or helped expose and prosecute, often working with Police, FBI, SS, and CIA, sometimes working against rogue elements of those and other agencies, even spy agencies of other governments.

Left out of that list, are perhaps 200 Stalking, Wire Tapping, and Torture cases I’ve worked on as online consultant with victims of such affairs (I’ve had contact with 12,000 individuals in that kind of predicament). I left them out because it would have made the post unreadable, and that’s a shame… a disservice to the thousands of victims of this form of abuse of power and conspiratorial corruption of principalities and powers.

So I do not claim to be a mere terrorist, but to have stopped terrorism. But neither am I a mere conspiracy theorist, because many of the conspiracy theories I’ve investigated have put people in jail, or at least shut them down and forced them to run away. One Governor, possibly two, a National Guard General, an elected County Sheriff, two Police Chiefs, a Criminal Investigation Division Lt., a C.E.O. of an international software firm, and a host of lower law enforcement personnel have all vacated their posts (some being jailed) after I finished doing my thing. While I cannot claim every one of them retired or otherwise departed their posts because of me, as I was not allowed access to official internal documents, I’m fairly certain a good number of them grumbled my name under their breath on the way out the door.

All that said, I hope that you, dear reader, have come to understand that a conspiracy theorist is no different than any other standard investigative force of a more official nature. Except for two small things, we all try to fit the available evidence with the environ of facts to determine the truth. We both form hypothetical postulations as to suspect and motive, prove opportunity and method, and try each point of evidence against all others which might disprove the hypothesis (though as we see all too often, many criminal cases are happy to prosecute the innocent if they think they can make a strong enough case and hide the truth).

We both theorize up front. The first difference is that conspiracy theorists do not have the luxury of making an official determination, while the official investigators do. The second difference, and most important, is that we start with questions regarding failures in logic in the official findings and reports; we question government, which is not only the right, but the DUTY of every citizen, always. How else will you ever find a cover up? We know there have been all manner of cover ups exposed in media over the last few decades, and I remind you, you NEVER have a cover up UNLESS there is a conspiracy, because a cover up itself REQUIRES a conspiracy to execute it, and the affair being covered up is always so complex that it, too, MUST by default represent a conspiracy. Guaranteed.

OK, FBI, come and cuff me… unless I’m wearing a bomb like other terrorists,or have run off to Mexico to escape your ‘justice,’ in which case, just have a better day.

Proof Seven: Shootings Form Multiple Lines to Cheops Exactly 500 Miles Apart


Extending select shooting lines finds them bisecting at the ancient Cheops Pyramid to establish a series of lines all of equal degrees of arc. But that just prepares us for a bigger bombshell.

Are there any patterns in mass shootings? 

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   proparanoidpress.com   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2014, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Please comment any such repost to original posting.

Is there any proof mass shootings are not random?

What you will learn reading this post of the posting series

•  that select shooting lines can be extended to a single spot on the other side of the World;
•  that spot is the Great Pyramid, Cheops;
•  that the lines are exactly 500 miles apart at a given point and form the same angle of arc.

Are mass shootings by intelligent design?

Proof Seven: Shootings Form Multiple Lines to Cheops Exactly 500 Miles Apart

Is there a mass shooting conspiracy?

The last proof resulted in some negative commentaries to group posts announcing its availability, all based on disbelief in the postulations advanced. This requires me to repeat myself: It does not matter what you or I believe, it only matters what the architects of mass shootings believe. Now, in this post, we start to examine the symbolism of Cheops and its ties to the shootings, which is also about what THEY believe. But first, I owe readers of Proof Six an explanation about the relevance of the ‘orange lines’ to select purple lines of the satanic baphomets and green lines of the Masonic emblems discussed as tying directly tie to Proof Seven in an unusual manner. So here we go, referencing the image below…

The orange lines are the multiple lines to Cheops this post is all about, of course, but those lines by and large pass through Europe using what is known as the Polar Route on their way to Egypt; the shortest, most direct route, despite the fact that in the movies they always depict planes flying East over the Atlantic to get to either Europe or the Middle East, or the other way ’round if going to the U.S. This is why, for instance, Iran Contra gun running used a stopover in Denmark and other Euro sites on their way to Iran, something which at first didn’t make sense to me when I learned of it.

The purple and green guidelines used in finding and plotting the baphomets and emblems also go to Europe, and end up doing something the bulk of the orange lines ALSO do: they just happen by ‘coincidence’ to pass through at least one, but more often, MULTIPLE ancient Illuminati and Knights Templar castles and other properties employed in their conspiratorial affairs, including some more modern facilities, and even Adam Weishaupt’s birthplace. He, of course, was the founder of the Illuminati, and a high Mason, and the Templars were the folks who evolved eventually to become the Freemasons we have today, as outlined in my book, MC Realities. There is one other line which does this, which is a red line created from a perfect isosceles triangle from Proof Three, which is the best example of ties to the modern Illuminati, as well as ancient, but also Cheops as it also directly intersects with the famous glass pyramid at the Louvre Museum in Paris.

There are other indications these lines and their relationships with Illuminati and Templars is tied to Cheops, in that some of the lines continue past Europe to the Middle East to find Templar sites, there, and two others, one each from a baphomet and an emblem, go directly to Cheops as if an orange line. It is interesting to note further, that these two are extremely close to the second orange line in from either side of the six orange lines; uniformity. Take a look: each white arrow indicates a line of interest which ties to the Templars or Illuminati. The ‘houses’ represent Templar locations (those icons refuse to float accurately over their respective sites at this viewing altitude), and the harder to see red dots are Illuminati, save Weishaupt’s birthplace, which is well marked. There are 18 lines in all, our magic number which equates to 666 in occult terms, only one of which (orange) does not find a Templar or Illuminati site, but we are talking about locations which in many cases have been lost through the centuries and, likely, it really does do so, but we simply have no such knowledge, today. The modern day Illuminati, however, WOULD know. The line certainly passes through territories where such properties are otherwise existent (not all sites are shown, only those which are intersected by lines).

pastpaths

Cheops I had previously been aware of the importance of Cheops to Masonic and Satanic histories, some more tenuous or doubtful than others, but all generally of a mutually supportive nature. If one reads the Masonic Bible, Morals and Dogma, it is clear that the leadership of the organization at the higher levels, is Satanic in its beliefs, practices, and tactical applications, and that all things of Ancient Egyptian lore play into their belief structures and lore. To Masons, especially, there is significance in the Pyramid, and thereby, also to Satanism.

Yet one can find other resources which state the Pyramid is outright tied to Satanism in one way or another, both inclusive and exclusive of Masonic ties, which came later in history. It is a Chicken or Egg question, or sorts, depending on the factoid being considered, but we need not answer those questions; our concerns are valid regardless of the answer. So when I noticed that some shooting lines seemed to angle off toward what I knew to be the ‘polar route’ to Egypt. I sought to verify, and was immediately proven correct. In the image above, find six orange lines which all meet precisely at the peak of Cheops a third-way around the World. They are all drawn at the same degree of angular separation (about 7.5 degrees).

At a given point in the map, in America, they are all exactly 500 miles apart, and as this image shows, they relate to shootings as they go. To date, only one (left most) has no useful shooting along its path to make the claim, but that does not mean there will not be in the future, and so, it is included. It may prove a means of predicting and even preventing a shooting. CHEOPS ALIGNMENTS x 6 There is no significance in the 500 number — at any given point, the lines are equidistant by some measure, I just chose a point where it produced a round number.

However, as research continued, I learned some things which would seem to make that a more important point. In the image below, this is revealed, and in the doing, we see also how the shootings themselves tie to the lines in important ways. More than this, the actual measurements once more reveal magical use of numbers in the occult manner. We should talk about accuracy. Given the great distance these lines must travel (35 million feet or more), the worst accuracy of these key lines is typically less than .05 degrees of arc (dependent upon Google Earth limitations as discussed early in this posting series), or some 15,000 feet at measure point. These work out to a maximum error of .007% and .0004%, respectively. I’m good enough with that to cite it here as proof of intent, given that the architects of mass shootings likely used the same tools, as I. There has, after all, already been revealed in prior Proofs several clues that such is likely the case.

cheopsUSA

Here we see some 440 plus mass shootings plotted along with the six orange lines from Cheops. The three green and three red lines are for measurement purposes, and require some dialog in order to appreciate the ‘craftmanship’ employed by the architects; a kind of confirmation this is no random outcome. The Meridianal (vertical) circumference of the Earth varies depending on where measured, but the average is 40,008 Km. This means that the point where the orange lines are furthest apart is some 10,000 Km distant from Cheops. This spot is found at the middle green line, and the measure there is essentially 2,525 miles.

This is confirmed in the red line between adjacent orange lines which measures 505 miles.  The other two lines are the points where 500 miles between, is found, for 2,500 miles total separation, there. EACH OF THE THREE HAS AT LEAST THREE SHOOTINGS ALONG ITS PATH. These numbers prove interesting, and thus I also elected to measure the diagonal (vertical red) and ‘hight’ (red along the orange line’s path) of a given rectangle formed by these lines. The vertical line, which happens to be North corrected for magnetic declination, a trait seen time and again in the various alignments of Satanic and Masonic symbols in the prior Proof, measures 777, a magical triplet. The height measures 606 miles. More interesting numbers.

Take a look (numbers are rounded unless otherwise stated, and reflect allowances for measurement errors introduced by Google Earth as previously mentioned): Note: you may wish to review the sidebar post on Magic Numbers before continuing. Because… 500 Miles = a palindromic 434 nautical, which sums in pairs to 77; 777 is not only a magical triplet, but forms by summing in twos (1414) the inverse palindromes 141 and 414, which sum together to form the triplet 555, and equals 675 nautical, which sums to 18, and 1250.46 Km, which sums to 18 by threes; 505 and 606 are both palindromes, of course. And about 2525, divide it by 505, and it goes exactly 5 times. 505 + 606 = the double doublet 1111 (a quad) 500 x 505 = 252500, which sums to the doublet 77; 500 x 606 = 303000, a palindrome times 1,000; 505 x 606 = 306030, a palindrome times 10 which sums in threes to 99, which is a code number for 666 just as is 18; 306030 also = 492508 Km, which sums to form the inverse palindromes 151 and 515; and 606 x 777 = 470862 which is divisible by 18 2,159 times, and the grandaddy 666, 707 times.

So we end up with 505, 606, and 707 palindromes, and the triplets 555, 666, and 777. 505 squared = 255025, which sums by twos to the palindrome 757; 606 squared  = 367236, which sums to the the triplet 999, a code number for 666 (upside down); it also divides by 18 to provide the palindrome 20402; 777 squared = 603729, which can produce 999 by summing by 3, 2, 1 digits consecutively, a bit unusual; We can’t easily find the area by simply multiplying 606 x the top or bottom, because they are different. We can do that with both and then average the result. This yields 303000, a palindrome times 1000, and 306030, a palindrome x 10. The total of the two  sums to 609360, sums to the palindrome 6116, and which divided by two = 304680. So now we know the area, which is 1680 sq. miles more than the smaller of the two, and that much less than the larger, of course. 1680 = 2704 Km, which not only sums to 13, but is divisible by 13 208 times.

The orange lines in detail

In the last Proof, we found the orange lines tied usefully to the layout of the four baphomets and Masonic emblems. Here, lets relate them more directly to the actual shootings which were also part and parcel of those relationships. The first lines at image left does NOT actually line up with anything, YET. It is presumed they will eventually line up with a shooting and may be useful in prediction of same, as there are very few communities in its path with logical targets which fit with other predictive factors. But I will not state these as our paranoid government tends to make anyone predicting such violence based on ANY criteria as the only ‘terrorist’ or ‘suspect’  in question. They tend to lock down such locations and charge the person who gave the warning with criminal intent of one sort or another, or act harshly against them in some way. Apparently, ‘See Something, Say Something,’ is a trap, and considered a crime. I know that at least twice that I reported terrorist activities, they did nothing about the report other than to harass me and try to cost me my job.

The next line is perhaps the most dramatic in terms of accuracy and alignment. It bisects with extreme accuracy two shooting events, even a third within Google Earth dictated error limits. The third also has three shootings within accuracy limits, two of which almost meet doorway-to-doorway accuracy.That line also passes through the Denver International Airport and quite near to a man-made earthen Ziggurat (stepped) Pyramid thought by many conspiracy theorists to be a D.U.M.B. (Deep Underground Military Base). The site claims to be a landfill, albeit the highest and fastest growing of its kind by far, if true.

It is also true that in its current state, it only appears to be a Pyramid in three of the four sides, the fourth being the area where ‘fill’ is taking place at this time. The next line features the sloppiest, worst-case error with two shooting points in its path. The larger error does not dissuade me, because both are quite equally distant from the line on opposite sides of the line (the line cleanly centers between them). There is additionally a business, Pyramid Foods, almost directly on the line near the Bartlesville HS shooting plot of that line. The next line also sports two shootings, one of which is quite near Meridian, MS; Cheops is itself a similar distance from Meridian, Egypt (a neighborhood name also used in several business names, there). The final Cheops line merely intersects within 1,000 feet of a single shooting event. This is near King’s Highway, and Cheops is a King’s tomb. Thus all the lines currently aligned with shooting points, are several are also aligned with something having to do with a Pyramid. This yields yet more consistency, but feel free to presume it coincidence, if you must. What does Cheops have to do with mass shootings?

Why Pyramid?

Beyond the earlier comments about why Cheops is important to Masons and Satan worshipers, there are a few other things which should be mentioned. One has to do with the construction of the Pyramid, which many historians think drove the establishment of at least some of the ancient Egyptian’s measurement system. What is interesting about that, as casually mentioned earlier in this series, is that as history progressed, their system became in various ways the bases for both the English and Metric systems, as well as the system employed in America. It is alleged that Masons (Templars) were the driving force behind this, in part, to insure or play to the mysteries of magic numbers.

One of the few 3-D cutaway views on the Web from ancient-egypt.org (click)

So do not be surprised then, if the next post, I tell you that there is not at least one measurement at Cheops which is duplicated in shooting lines here in America which depict the same part of a pyramid in a 3-D view, but using different increments and a different scale (think miles for inches, for example). I’m still working on verification of a list of suspect instances, but it certainly seems the case. This would NOT be possible if there was not some basic underlying ‘magic’ built into both measuring systems with respect to conversions. But the real thing of interest about Cheops, here, is its lore.

Many learned researchers have studied the Pyramids endlessly to formulate many different theories relating to its design, how it was constructed, what its purpose was, and so forth. Many of their findings are controversial, but few are invalidated by the work of others, but might remain rightly in the realm of speculation, or ‘lore.’ Among these are two which would logically be of interest to a Warlock or high Mason (sometimes, the same thing).

The first involves the inner passageways of Cheops. We know these are important to the architects of shootings because, as we will see in the next Proof, they are faithfully duplicated in the 3-D depiction of Cheops by use of shooting lines and shootings. The reason why would seem to be in the lore, which according to some, says that these passages are a kind of history of the World being depicted from creation to its destruction. They actually make a very good case for this, and my own conclusions would tend to agree there is something to the notion, at least symbolically, if not accurately to the year. The claim was, that each Egyptian inch represented one year of history, a thing which seems to be true at least for specific historical events used as benchmarks.

If, therefore, the need to seat the Antichrist in support of end time prophesies requires taking away guns in America to allow the formation of the North American Union, then our architects, being wise in the magic and lore of Cheops and the like, would most likely incorporate as much of that magic into their plans as they could manage. The second involves what is called Pyramid Power in a book by the same name written by Max Toth, which is as good a reference as any of like conent summarizing the lore of Cheops, including the inches for years theory. If even half of the claims within were true (and I have verified at least two of the main claims in my own experiments), that is one more reason a Warlock would wish to incorporate pyramids into any conspiracy aimed at seating the Antichrist. But again let me say, it does not matter what you or I believe about such lore, it only matters what THEY believe.

Go back to Introduction

Go back to Proof SixShootings Also Relate or Depict Masonic and Satanic symbols

Go to Proof Eight: Shooting Lines Also Depict Cheops in 3-D Cutaway View

Crime Series: Ten Unexpected Proofs ‘Random’ Mass Shootings are by Intelligent Design


Ten easy-to-grasp but remarkable proofs, both visible and hidden: Illuminati style mystical symbolism and related ancient magical mysteries, calling cards, bragging rights, and Warlock spells cast against America, and the World. Conventional clues, too.

Are there any patterns in mass shootings? 

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   proparanoidpress.com   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2014, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Please comment any such repost to original posting.

Is there any proof mass shootings are not random?

What you will learn reading this multi-part posting series…

•  there are 10 interlocking proofs that mass shootings are not random;
•  they include various kinds of patterns, visible and unseen, and even coded information;
•  that the pattern predicts itself, and understanding may therefore help stop the murder;
•  that the codes and clues seem to be like signatures identifying the architects.

Are mass shootings by intelligent design?

Introduction: Ten Proofs ‘Random’ Mass Shootings by Intelligent Design

Is there a mass shooting conspiracy?

Note: This series is not yet ready for full presentation, but the most recent Fort Hood forces me to start releasing the material without delay. The reason for delay has had to do with an inability to provide high quality graphics suitable for proofs. This will be overcome, shortly, I hope.

One thing you need to know about me as an investigative writer or, as media and government would prefer you to think of me, a ‘conspiracy theorist,’ is this: whenever I decide to take a close look at a potential conspiracy or lesser matter, I do it right. If I cannot uncover something no one else has brought to light, I’m either not finished, or I’ve backed out concluding it beyond reach, or a dud. If you read my findings on a given research, you will undoubtedly learn something FACTUAL no one else had previously discovered or brought to light. And so…

In this matter, we find the shear volume of startling new information overshadows and renders original headlines and competing theories essentially meaningless — especially media’s version. It will make you angry. It will scare you. The question is, will it motivate you to do something about it? YOU are what you are waiting for, you know.

But in introduction, there is still one other point which must be made; it is in form of a problematic question. Can I get you, the reader, to override your current belief structures long enough to  consider the unusual nature of the findings? This presentation will most assuredly fly in the face of what most people consider ‘traditional wisdom,’ but it also will explain why it is non-the-less valid. Can you handle the Truth, or will you wimp out to the comfort zone of current beliefs?

Area all mass shooters psycho?

On suspending belief structures

mythbust

Dormer was not quite a ‘Mass Shooter’ incident, at least not at a single location/time. But the affair highlights the problem of accepting ‘random’ as the right word to apply to shootings when there are so many problems with the official story. CLICK to learn about why many people think him just another shooting patsy.

I began a ten-year research project for a book, Fatal Rebirth, in late 1989, which also begat a screenplay published on line in 1999 (The Electronic Apocalypse). In the book’s Introduction I urged the reader to suspend their belief structures briefly and read the material as if merely fiction for entertainment’s sake, because many of the concepts within were so new and unusual as to defy belief — likely seen as ‘far-fetched’ by most uninformed readers. I offered over 1,500 footnotes and a huge Appendix section to help them consider why I deemed them factual.

This blog post should be read in like manner, especially if you are content with government’s actions, are a politician, member of a government agency, military, or any part of the justice system, or Media. Especially if you are involved in a mass shooting incident as a professional or a victim seeking to know the truth. And even more so if you are gun owner, or even among what 2nd Amendment supporters refer to as a ‘gun grabber.’ I plead, therefore, that you suspend your belief structures briefly as if reading a political/horror-science fiction piece.  That’s what it is, actually, minus the fiction component.

You will, like readers of Fatal Rebirth, I would hope, realize the truth by the time you reach the end. Or, at the very least, you will be entertained for all your reluctance to let the message sink in and take root.

If nothing else, even if you choose to doubt some of the more obscure subtopics (i.e., relating to mysticism) have any factual basis in REALITY, consider this: it matters NOT what YOU think, given they ARE taken as real by persons likely to be behind any such conspiracy (i.e., ‘Illuminati’ Satanists). You MUST also ask yourself, “Can the sheer magnitude of interlocking clues be ignored?” Because at every turn they defy the odds of coincidental probability, as illustrated by carefully crafted control study groups. If thinking logically, you MUST concur that intelligent design is revealed despite what you may think about the logic of the beliefs which lay behind it, or the unusual way in which the evidence was revealed.

Pending you conclusion, by all means feel free to think me mad if you must. Read just for fun, but please read it through to end before you render final judgment as to if madness or truth be present. A logical reader will be converted unless their mind is already so firmly made up that they do not wish to be confused by facts which destroy their belief structures. Judge not what ye know not, but that upon which ye are well informed and have considered fully, judge freely.

Your future and the future of your children could well be at stake, a statement applying to all mankind. Why do I say this? The book mentioned above, Fatal Rebirth, was based on trying to illustrate what I call the Unified Conspiracy Theory; the notion that all of America’s darkest bumps in the night for the last half of the prior Century, forward, were not random oddities by random people for random agenda, but carefully orchestrated by the same core group of people with but one goal for the World in mind.

I termed them Shadow, but they are also known by other names; the New World Order, the Illuminati, the Power Elite, Globalists, and among them, member names like CIA, Skull and Bones, Bilderbergers, Council on Foreign Relations, and many more of like nature. Their goal I termed End Game; the establishment of a One World government, a single seat of power in order to seat the Antichrist upon his throne and bring us to Armageddon.

The Unified Conspiracy Theory, once justified in research and taking shape in book form, led me to realize that their stepwise actions over fifty years of mysteries were indeed leading to one goal. Knowing the goal, I reasoned, it should be possible to forecast the next logical steps. So the book also included within its presentation several terrible event predictions expected to take place in our near future. Thus far, though I do not claim to have gotten all event details precisely correct, many terrible forecasts have already come to pass. Among these were:

a) an assassination attempt on Ross Perot or his family to cause him to drop out of the Presidential Race, a matter which indeed transpired using mailed Anthrax according to a Secret Service back channel contact;

b) the false flag downing of the World Trade Center by civilian passenger jets which;

c) resulted in a series of Middle East Oil Wars. Other predictions include two more terror plots which are part and parcel of this blog post. Those are…

d) a false flag nuclear attack on Charleston, S.C. and Portland Oregon (the later of which I have already thwarted, it seems – see middle of my home page), and more to the point…

e) MASS SHOOTINGS.

Note: you can get a free copy of Vol I of Fatal Rebirth (ebook) by email request to pppbooks at Comcast (net). You will be glad you did, as it will take you far deeper into the Rabbit Hole than Alice or Neo had ever gone. This pill is black, though trimmed in red, white, and blue.

So, if ready to suspend your belief structure, let us begin. Pretend there is, despite media’s recent attempt in the Cincia shooting to portray anyone who believes in the New World Order as mentally ill and anti-patriotic, that such a conspiracy is actually afoot. Also pretend, if you must, that Political Control Technology in the form of the Manchurian Candidate is real. There are real-life Jason Bournes out there, as my book, MC Realities, and other books on Political Control Technology illustrate more than adequately. Even the Smithsonian channel knows.

This will make the key postulations, testing methods, conclusions, and proofs of the core material easier to accept, especially as they will be offered in the manner of scientific discovery — exactly as I undertook them as investigative writer. You will, in fact, be able to retrace my work to double check it, if you wish — as long as you review the full series of posts and sidebars before you attempt it, lest you make a critical error.  Please subscribe to my blog pages to insure you are notified as the remaining posts in the series are added.

Are mass shootings are by intelligent design?

The Investigation

Jason Bourne… though fictional, is based on real-World programmable assassins. Do you suppose CIA or anyone else would not find something useful to do with failures in such programs? Might they not make excellent disposable patsies? Image/film: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0372183/

Some several months ago, insulted by media’s misreporting of Aurora and Sandy Hook and outright clues that a disinformation campaign was afoot, I began finding ample cause for concern.  But how might one determine if other mass shootings were arranged as part of some kind of sick criminal conspiracy, one which might involve both real and faked shootings?

I started with several basic presumptions of truth, and then set about to see if the logical evidence such presumptions would require were indeed in place.  The ‘illogical’ presumptions fostered by the Unified Conspiracy Theory requiring suspension of belief are as follows:

1)    That Shadow and their Globalism requires destruction of America, and its Constitution in order to enable forming the North American Union, a matter which in turn requires that the Right to Bear Arms is first invalidated, and arms confiscated or gun owners otherwise neutralized in a manner similar to that of the Australia;

2)    That the New World Order, the modern day Illuminati, if you will, would be well capable of undertaking a campaign of gun violence for such cause, but being an Illumined Power Elite lost to Satanic and Masonic mysticism, they would employ mystical constructs which would leave detectible footprints if knowing what to look for;

3)    That the principle tool of such a plot would involve a small army of patsies, cut outs, and fall guys, principally from a category best known to the public as Manchurian Candidates. It may additionally involve a small army of blindly obedient members placed within our armed forces, the intelligence community, and law enforcement to aid more indirectly in supporting roles. This would include logistics, psyops, and cover up, or even command and control, generally unaware as to the truth or reason behind their orders. These are the same players frequently found playing key roles in the lives of mind control victims at large.

All three presumptions must be true to make a proper accusation, for they comprise the basic proofs of any crime: Motive, Opportunity, and Means. Normally, we think of opportunity as meaning access to the scene of the crime, typically proven by forensics such as fingerprints, or better yet, actual eye witnesses. In this case, they deliberately left their fingerprints, in a manner of speaking. In fact, the bulk of the proofs fall into this category, perhaps even naming individuals behind the plot. At the very least, we are indeed dealing with the Elite, those involved in principalities and powers.

Indeed: Two names have already surfaced by such clues, and both are billionaires. I also have a dozen other names of likely conspirators, but no names are released; these things are my Life Insurance Policy.

Sidebar PostOn Programmable People. This sidebar post addresses the notion of the possibility that at least some mass shooters are mind controlled patsies, and reconciles their coexistence with truly random shootings ­­— those which are more naturally spontaneous crimes — which can collectively still both be component parts of the same intelligent design.  This leads us to the finer details of how shooting event locations and dates lend importance to our consideration, and just how these things can additionally reveal intentional, yet concealed clues.

Here it should be mentioned, that many observers of the New World Order crowd favor the supposition that among their leadership we might find the modern-day Illuminati in spirit, if not in actual blood lineage, even though they may have since assumed a different family name. By way of example, in my research, I have had reason to conclude that the Rotheschild name was assumed; those assuming it being Knights Templar in hidding, their wealth derived from Templar treasure, and not truly Jewish by ancestry or faith, at all.

Many who favor the notion of a Modern-day Illuminati additionally believe, as do I, that there are at least two, and as many as four groups competing with each other within the movement to be the ones ‘honored’ to have one of their own selected to become the Antichrist. Much of what is discovered in this investigative series will point to this being true in one way, or inherently implied in another. It is, in fact, one very good reason to employ symbolisms and other clues which act as signatures of those so bidding for selection.

Such evidence was abundant, even easy to find, and I remain convinced that the trio of presumptions are sound enough to warrant seeking incontrovertible proofs. I sought such proofs both in quality and quantity sufficient to illustrate that ‘random’ was not the right word to describe mass shootings, but rather, ‘intelligent design,’ is.

The path of my continued investigation led to endless shocking discoveries, but there was a problem: to describe the methods and explain findings to the casual reader would, it seemed, require a tedious educational process and boring, repetitious citation of facts. It would be about as fun to read as a spreadsheet or database. Not good.

People want visual sound bites easily grasped. More so if Sheeple content with their Evening News and easily frightened off by words like ‘conspiracy theorist,’ and ‘New World Order,’ or similar. Worse, the investigation bogged because of the real life tragedies each shooting represented. Proper investigation meant exhaustive study of individual events, reviewing endless horrific detailed accounts and sad, brutal media imagery. It was taking an emotional and even physical toll upon my body and mind, and my spirit. Eventually, instead of plodding along 10-14 hours a day as at the start, I found myself barely able to work on it a few hours a week.

I played with several ideas on how to present the story NOW, without completion of the full study, for there is indeed already a mountain of proofs uncovered. But again, the complexities in presentation left me feeling it a hopeless task. Finally, I decided to break it down into about a dozen short compartmentalized components suitable for a series of blog posts. Frankly, I’m hoping it will spur someone to offer useful help; it will take funding and staffing to properly complete the study. Or better still, perhaps some Sheriff or other authority will assume the duty as result of shootings in their jurisdiction.

Follows is a synopsis of the Ten Proofs to be presented. There will additionally be, at appropriate points, companion posts detailing the scientific methods or other analytical procedures involved in select proofs where a doubting Thomas type may wish to challenge the validity of claims. I firmly believe that for my proofs to be accepted, they should be presented in a way such that ANYONE can duplicate my work and verify accuracy and conclusions.

This is a legitimate investigation despite its atypical and unorthodox methods and odd topics involved. NOTE: links will NOT WORK until the various posts involved have been posted. You may click on them to discover their current state. Again, subscription to this blog will notify you when new posts are added.

What are the ten proofs of a mass shooter conspiracy?

The Ten Proofs in review…

Proof One: Gun Grabbers Selectively Ignore Mass Shootings, Conceal Patterns;

Any time you find a cover up, you necessarily have a conspiracy to contend with. Gun grabbing groups, including government and biased or puppet media forces, should be using every opportunity to make their case for gun control, but act as if the bulk of gun violence never took place. Why do they employ selective blinders? There is a reason.

Proof Two: Shootings Exist in Identical ‘Magical’ Categorical Clusters;

The Illuminati loves magical numbers, as they can translate into meaningful words or names, or leverage ‘spells’. Interesting then, that basic shooting statistics establish set after set in the most magical and potent number of all, one which decodes to ‘Satan.’ This alone reveals dramatic coincidences well beyond the possibility of random chance.

Proof Three: Shootings Exist in Endless Sets of Three Forming Straight Lines;

The same Dispersal Pattern Studies method applied by government researchers to UFO sightings reveals Mass Shootings do something UFO sightings allegedly do not: form repetitive patterns with GPS accuracy, doorway-to-doorway-to-doorway.

Proof Four: Straight Lines in Turn Form Complex and Perfect Shapes;

When it comes to symbolism, nothing outperforms a graphical shape. Better still when that shape itself has magical properties or relationships to other shapes, or its own hidden or obvious meaning. 

Proof Five: Shapes in Turn Form Complementary ‘Magical’ Clusters;

It defies odds that perfect shapes should cluster together in ways which share overlapping lines or corners, and be generally both aligned and mirrored in additional symbolism.
 

Proof Six: Shootings Also Relate or Depict Masonic and Satanic symbols;

Select shootings define such symbols with precision. Masonic Symbols are rendered in 3-D. Satanic Symbols are positioned correctly for magical application by Warlock.

Proof Seven: Shootings Form Multiple Lines to Cheops Exactly 500 Miles Apart;

Extending select shooting lines finds them bisecting at the ancient Cheops Pyramid to establish a series of lines all of equal degrees of arc. But that just prepares us for a bigger bombshell.

Proof Eight: Shooting Lines Also Depict Cheops in 3-D Cutaway View;

The Great Pyramid in Egypt is one of the Holy of Holies to Masons and some satanic cults, and is specifically tied in mysticism to the End Times and historical catastrophic events. This one will scare you.

Proof Nine: Shooting Sets Share ‘Magical’ Data Points Which Decode to Messages;

Shooting line sets share three or more identical magical numbers within their data points. These decode to tell us when and where the next shooting will be, name a shooter, or perfectly prophesy some specific outcome.

Proof Ten: Individual Shootings Examined in Micro Duplicate the National Study Proofs

Two examples are offered; Aurora and Sandy Hook. They not only duplicate the ten proofs, but they mirror each other and one points to the other.
Why are mass shootings on the rise?

Are you ready of this? Buckle up!

So let us begin. I propose your best bet will be to SUBSCRIBE to my blog pages so that you are automatically notified as new posts are made to complete the series. Please link, share, tweet, etc., and by all mean vote your ranking at page top of each one, and comment with your questions, criticisms, or thoughts. How else will other know this is important?

Do bear in mind as you read, each offered proof individually seems to defy the odds or logic path required for truly random shooting events. Collectively, it is monumentally clear. Also bear in mind that I am human, and I, like any other, am prone to making mistakes. A ton of information had to be entered and copied from one location to another multiple times (multiple database and software applications). Therefore, either because of a mistake on my part, or perhaps because of a mistake in media or other accounts/records, any given individual data point in any given set of proofs may be found invalid.

By all means let me know if you find such a discrepancy, but please remember this: a single error in a single data point does not invalidate all other data points, and therefore, does not invalidate the conclusions or the suppositions, themselves. In order to dispute my findings, you will need to offer proofs that the method is flawed, the entire data set was in error, or analytical logic was faulty. More: such dispute must address and ultimately invalidate all ten proofs, or short of that, offer equally viable alternative explanations which fit the findings and afford a more innocent explanation.

Since each proof tends to defy all possible odds of random coincidence, and does so consistently, again and again, naysayers will have their work cut out for them. More so, because in many cases, control groups have been established to show truly random data points enjoy no such pattern. I have done my homework, and carefully so.

I will demand the same of naysayers.

Go to Proof OneGun Grabbers Selectively Ignore Mass Shootings, Conceal Patterns

Go to Side Bar: On on Programmable People

 

How to War with the New World Order (a Primer)


If you are no fan of the notion of a fascist, satanic World government ruling a depopulated World with all the power of the Antichrist, you may want to know there is one simple weapon we hold that the NWO fears we will discover and use, one more dangerous than guns.

How to War with the New World Order (a Primer)

by H. Michael Sweeney
copyright © 2013, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this paragraph, are included.

How to war with the New World Order

 Any enemy can be defeated if you know their weaknesses

Masonic mural at Denver International Airport depicts future of New World Order

Follows is an abbreviated collection of excerpts and updates from my book, The Professional Paranoid Defensive Field Guide, which includes many more such tactical advices, many being useful in any kind of war the New World Order force upon us, even a shooting war. But this post addresses a war that we can more safely bring to them, one non violent, perhaps forestalling the need for guns altogether by stopping the NWO cold.

Regardless, it also undoubtedly gets me listed officially as a ‘financial terrorist’ with evil Men in Black (or Army green, Police blue). Who cares? We are all treated as terrorists anyway, pending a moment of convenient political gain for actual ‘attention’ to our particular branding. Screw them and their paranoiac need to so label free thinkers, of whom Thomas Jefferson says government should rightly fear (for cause of making them BEHAVE RIGHTLY).

They can NDAA-vanish me at anytime, if they dare — just as they can any of YOU. That’s the whole point, isn’t it? If one man is not free because government violates its own Constitutional Law, then no one can rightly claim to be free. And so, given Homeland Security has placed bid requests for 1.4 billion rounds of ammunition for use outside of the military, the threat of an outlaw government seeking or expecting a shooting war with Constitutionalists forces me to write. If they so expect, so must we.

I must write, if for no other reason than personal self defense, which depends in turn upon the successful defense of others, give such advice. It is the collective WE, The People, who must survive, not mere individuals. Governments can come and go, can fail and be reconstituted, overnight if need be. But if freedom dies and We the People become a historical footnote, transformed into mere chattle as manageable individuals for feeding the profit grist mill of a corporate state (that’s fascism, by the way), something precious and extremely difficult to replace is lost for a long, long time.

The advice of which I speak consists of three simple steps, each with multiple topical elements, options, or ways to grasp and effect them. This post details Steps One of three. Collectively, they would allow us to be effective in the effort, and better assure individual and collective safety even if armed conflict is forced upon us.

And there are other resources online, some of which I have linked as you read. There is, for instance, fightthenwo.org, numerous sites promoting an effort called ‘global noncompliance’, and illuminati-news.com, where one finds an article somewhat like my own. Just type in the appropriate search terms to amplify your knowledge base, and your options, and to cement your confidence if daring to stand against the machine as do I.

You and I are not alone, given the broad range of topics which stir people to activisim in causes with which you should become familiar, for it makes of such persons a thing called allies. You need not agree with them all, but we all should stand together, for all such activists become targets of the NWO. I’m talking about things like Agenda 21, Canamex Highway, gun bans, Codex Alimentarius, Digital Angel, TIAO Dataveillance, RFID, NDAA, the FED, Political Control Technology, Chemtrails, Animal Rights, Occupy, Anonymous, and on and on and on.

Often, we should consider allying with both sides, perhaps one more than another if so moved — but ever mindful that the enemy loves to divide and conquer by fueling our disdain for one side over another. Fighting amongst ourselves means we don’t even see the real enemy. All these groups, save moments of manipulation, should be ally and enemy to the Globalist agenda, and not enemy, mine. To steal from another anti-NWO group’s slogan… which I essentially endorse, and again for which the operative word elected is WE…

“We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.”

What can we learn from Anonymous? The most obvious lesson is that invisibility equates to an invulnerability to retaliation. Sure, they have losses, but the group is getting stronger and gaining in popularity in pop culture and elsewhere, and doing some real good as it goes, as some count good (no movement pleases all its supporters all the time). But by and large, their integrity as a working force against evil is unchecked because of their anonymity. They are off the Grid, beyond the Matrix (though hiding within and manipulating it), they have gone Underground.

That is were we must be to be both safe and effective in battle; underground.

So begins our review on how to drop out of the system and form your own underground — which is also to say, how to more covertly and safely defend your country from enemies foreign and domestic. These are fairly basic ideas, and yet may simply be too much for most readers to contemplate actually undertaking, at least wholesale (easing in may indeed be easier). But sooner or later, the way MIIM is heading with insane abandon, we are all going to be forced to make a tough choice: do we stay within the system and be controlled by it with no recourse, or do we break away from the system and seek its destruction through violent confrontation, or at least prepare for that eventuality? I think dropping out is a better, safer choice, one which also serves as preparation for a possible violent day; it covers all bases.

Our survival as free-will individuals and citizens, and as a free nation, will likely depend on our decision. Better to make the decision sooner, than later. Better to do it methodically under a plan and with good principles of operation than by forced into spontaneous guesswork on the fly by sudden, unexpected perils. When MIIM makes its final moves, the warning may be mere hours before they start going door-to-door and shooting erupts, and politically incorrect persons are vanished. It will be too late for decisions, much less planning, then.

What can be done to stop the New World Order?

Step 1: Understand the Problem, Know Thy Enemy

A few hundred people control the NWO

One must realize that the New World Order movement, with its roots going back to the Satanic Illuminati in, perhaps not so coincidentally, 1776, was a centuries-long plan to form a one-World government that their might be one World leader; the Antichrist. Believe it or not, we are dealing with powers and principalities, a relentless and seemingly unstoppable force which never sleeps, has countless minions of dark allies and dupes like forces to work with them unknowingly, and employs clever deceits and sinister plots to lubricate its machinations. Most of the battle is invisible, as often is also the outcome; we can loose significant ground and not even be aware until much later — the price of forgetting or pretending there is no Satan or Hell… or even a God, for too many of us.

It is not the United States Federal Government, or the United Nations, or the initialed Agencies or Department of Defense, or local law enforcement that we face. It is not globalist corporate giants, the FED and Jewish or international bankers, or the Military-Industrial Complex or the oil companies who are our enemies, nor their boards of directors, foundations, religious and charity fronts, or their political action groups. It is not the modern-day leadership of Illuminati philosophies inherent in the Power Elite round table groups such as the Bilderbergers, Club of Rome, Council on Foreign Relations, Tri Lateral Commission, Rhodes Scholar disciples, or even the infamous Skull and Bones/Thule Societies and their counterparts, or even the Freemasons from which sprang the Satanic Illuminati. Neither is it CIA, FBI, NSA, DHS, DEA, ATF, ONI, DIA, or any of the endless initialed investigative and enforcement agencies.

No. It is instead all these entities combined, and much, much more, who make up the face of our enemy. To define or limit the enemy to any one group or several, short of the whole, will miss the mark, and fail. It matters not if they participate knowingly in support of Illuminati goals, or by coincidentally by coincidentally aligned or secretly guided agenda. They are the collective wall of hardened, massive stones which lay between being free in all pursuit of life, and being a slave dead to God. Those stones form the Pyramid upon which sits the All-Seeing Eye, which is the symbolism of the very Antichrist and End Times; the ‘eye’ of Lucifer taking up the key-most position (where one should instead find a stone referred to as the frustrum), thereby frustrating the placement of the capstone, the return of Christ.

The question then arises, what chance does the individual (YOU, me, all of us who prefer FREEDOM and LIFE to slavery and death) against such a vast array of forces? What chance would we have to make a difference in what essentially appears on the surface to be prophecy being fulfilled, day by day, regarding a predestined final-day battle between God and Satan? Who are we that dare intercede in such contests between Titans of Biblic proportions, and what could we possibly hope to contribute of any value or impact in a battle of such scale; that which leads to and includes the showdown at Armageddon?

The answer is, in my humble opinion, EVERYTHING.

It is not simply God vs. the Devil. It is God and the good sought and achieved by Man through God’s gift of free will vs. Satan and the evil done by Man by subversion of free will. It is about righteousness (right-use-ness) vs. evil (vile-ness), both effected by our own individual choices. I believe that to the extent that there remains sufficient good will and righteousness in Man in his time on Earth, the date of Armageddon, and those things which lead to it, are delayed. Scripture refers to this as Grace.

This whole notion is reflected manifold in scripture, for those willing to heed a rather short Bible lesson, which is an all important part of Step 1 — to fully understand the stakes involved and the true unseen mechanisms which guide outcome…

Jerimiah 5:1 regarding God’s Judgement upon Jerusalem for failing to honor God and his Commandments says “Go up and down the streets of Jerusalem, look around and consider, search through her squares. If you can find but one person who deals honestly and seeks the truth, I will forgive this city.”

Genesis 18:26 regarding Abraham’s prayers beseeching God not to destroy Sodom, God says in respose, “If I find fifty righteous people in the city of Sodom, I will spare the all the place for their sakes.” Abraham negotiates the number down to 10, an important number spiritually.

Romans 2:4 tells us why the forbearance of Grace is offered (though all-too often sadly betrayed by Man’s delight in sin) with “Or do you show contempt for the riches of his kindness, forbearance and patience, not realizing that God’s kindness is intended to lead you to repentance?”

2 Peter 3:9 is more to the point with dialog on the coming of Judgement Day, and Christ’s return. “The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.” Being patient, he gives us time (a period of Grace) in which to work toward salvation. What we do with that time is our own choice.

But if we make no effort on behalf of good in the face of evil, no matter how overwhelming it may seem, then we deserve the fruits of evil, as spelled out in Ecclesiastes 9:3 “This is the evil in everything that happens under the sun: the same destiny overtakes all. The hearts of people, moreover, are full of evil and there is madness in their hearts while they live, and afterward they join the dead.” More such as this can be found.

So let us also heed God’s advice and enter into battle. Ephesians 6:13 tells us how: “Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand.” Much more is also available on this topic, as well. But hey – this video says it in an extremely beautiful way.

The number 10 in the Bible (and elsewhere), for instance, represents fullness, full measure, fulfillment. Thus, as long as Good can be seen sufficiently ‘full,’ as in ‘full of Grace,’ which is God’s forgiveness and forbearance, there is no reason for Judgement Day to come to pass. Should Man drop below a rating of ’10,’ Judgement is enabled and will come to pass. Thus, I argue; it is all up to you and me, to decide that moment — perhaps why ‘No man knoweth the hour,’ of that day, for we cannot take self measure.

The Bible offers more and better advice, than this feeble attempt at presentation. I simply offer how you might apply it using specific strategems. Let us consider:

Short of armed revolution, and in the absence of any seeming control over our government through the traditional election processes, the alleged system of checks and balances and for obtaining redress in the courts… as illustrated by the failure of Congress and the Courts to ever address crimes of the White House, or to curb the military or intelligence communities when they go awry… and surely their failure to quash NDAA, the Patriot Act, the outrageous acts of TSA, ICE, and all such madness — is the option to undertake another kind of war with the NWO; a guerrilla war fought on our terms, not theirs. I speak of an offensive war, one which effects a defensive posture, as well.

It may be time we take the battle to them, and use their own System to ensnare them.

Let’s face it. The enemy, as it otherwise stands, holds all the cards: We must use their money, follow their laws and suffer under their court judgements (for most of us, relying upon their lawyers appointed on our behalf — unless we are wealthy, in which case, we are more likely part of the problem), are subjected to controls by their police and military, must depend on our news from sources their Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Media complex (MIIM) controls, send our kids to schools in an educational system they manipulate, and use their insurance to visit their Doctors, hospitals, and take their drugs, etc. All the way we foot the bill for these things which define our limitations, and profit their machine.

At every turn, they hold control over our lives: we cannot get a job without identifying ourselves using their number. We cannot keep that job without giving them a huge portion of our wages as taxes, which they then frequently use against us, along with other monies they manage to extort, steal, or siphon from us through societal forces of their design. We cannot well protest our lot because they own the media by which we would have our say, and we use an Internet rife with their control, censorship, and eavesdropping (there is a better Web alternative in works, however — take a look).

We cannot ‘vote the scoundrels out’ because they control the voting process and the choices we are to be given. Ergo, Dog and Poney shows replete with hanging chads or worse, and if not that, assassination of candidates or death threats against them or their loved ones. In short, the terms ‘Republic’ and ‘Democratic Process’ have become a sham, as no matter who we vote for, the same old policies are continued toward NWO domination.

As bad, ‘redress’ is a word no longer in the American political lexicon; the System is rigged at every turn to defy it except in the most well-funded of battles, it costing millions for instance to employ media to advantage, or prosecute a case through the Courts, and the Internet is so controlled by cyberwarrior tactics that most organizational efforts there are easily derailed through infiltration and sabotage. And now they want to take the guns, which if allowed to come to pass, will mean all doors for redress can be permanently shut tight against us.

No thank you. Gunfire before gun grabbing, for me.

But the purpose of this post is to avoid the need for that eventuality. We must realize who MIIM is, and deal with them accordingly. MIIM’s arrayed forces and allies are by and large fascists and racists, and even Satanists, or some combination thereof. They tend to be psychopaths and sociopaths who wield immense wealth and power in all areas of societal and governmental structures. Their collective is hundreds of years old, and thus, they have had ample time to calculate and think ahead, to plan for every contingency, and tend to easily defeat a defense before we can think to undertake it.

But there is good news in all this.
Despite their position of dominance, it happens that there is one thing all principalities and powers fear, something which we possess… something they fear we will discover as the weakness or flaw in their plan. And it is such a simple thing, and defines Step Two. The beauty of it is, that implementing it now not only weakens their hand and strengthens ours, but if at some point the war becomes a shooting war, we will stand a much better chance of being able to either run and hide or to stand and fight. Either way, it will be harder for them to find and manipulate and destroy individuals, and thereby, the whole.

You can do neither if they collect you, first, or already control you outright in their System, what some call the Matrix. The solution? That’s the next post…

What scares the New World Order?

Step Two: Drop out of the System:

To explain that first requires that we understand what the System is. The System is two infrastructural parts; the commercial side and the government side. The commercial side sells itself to you every day. Advertising for products and services creates desire. Desire leads to purchase. Purchase yields profits against cost, and is a two-edged sword used against you. Part of the cost is payroll, which is used to pay you less than you are actually worth. They reap the GNP at your expense; you provide both the labor and the capital which drives their machine, so whatever they pay you, they get back by the resale of your fruits (you effectively work for free by giving them back their own money in exchange for very little of true value).

All along the way, taxes are levied to fund the other part of the System. They win-win, you loose-loose, but you get (something) they’ve convince you that you can’t live without, despite the fact that the World did just fine without it since the beginning of time. Everything from better deoderant to cars that talk, from perfect pills to pornographic movies through your cable company. And let us not forget GMO produce and foods so processed and full of additives that ants no longer eat anything in our kitchens but raw suger. As Dr. Phil has said, “If it wasn’t food 100 years ago, it probably isn’t food, today.”

Lucky you to have it so good, at long last. Whatever happened to happiness; the contentment that comes from simply living and enjoying nature and the company of others, and the fruits of our own labor? Who decided that these things had to be purchased in newly constituted forms, and that we should have no other choices? And, I might add, who can believe anything they tell you about what is good for you when every few years a new study reverses a previous finding, and perfect pills result in class action law suits for the harm they do?

Oh, but the System cares not for trivial details as these, because we are so dumbed down we don’t see the problem, and buy the next new thing.

Meanwhile, the government part of the system tracks and manipulates our participation in the first part in many ways. Your social security number, as mentioned, plays a major role. Your credit rating and banking numbers further track your every move financially, and government’s FINCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) and the Total Information Awareness Office (Department of Defense) are both gearing up to access every transaction from birth to death for every citizen. As the Bible has predicted, you already can hardly buy or sell without a number of some sort, a de facto Mark of the Beast by some accounts. But that yolk has not yet come to pass in its bitter fullness (Digital Angel awaits you).

The money itself also has tracking systems built into the bills (the little embedded strip you can see holding the bills up to the light can be sensed by special equipment), and FINCEN will be able to track cash as easily as credit once it is fully established and retail systems have evolved to accommodate the technology, called RFID (Radio Frequency Identification Device).

The Military AND the commercial side are partnering to establish wholesale use of RFID technology which will allow transactional tracking at points of sale to include a complete and total understanding of each and every product you purchase, effectively giving it a unique serial number. It can tell how and when you acquired it, whatever it is, right down to razor blades (already chipped). In fact, retailers have actually used cameras to track shoppers as they move through the store by zeroing in on select RFID chips in products in their cart, or already owned and in their possession (e.g., lipstick tube). You are the sum of your RFID, and once cataloged, you can be tracked anywhere.

As you read this, cash registers, inventory control systems, and security systems (doorway monitors, cameras, traffic monitors) are being designed and built which can scan RFID at a distance. Millions of credit cards, mailing labels, ID cards and driver’s licenses, and even cell phones have already been chipped with RFID, and some things, like select cell phones and cars, include GPS tracking. Security cameras and roadside or sidewalk monitors are being upgraded to track them. Unless you go naked in the World, or make your own clothes and use no manufactured objects, you can be tracked by RFID, because everything manufactured and sold will eventually have chips embedded.

We register with government for everything. We register to be born and to die. We register for school, to vote, to get driver’s licenses, to fish or hunt, to buy or rent a car or home, to have a phone or utility services, or to save a little extra money when we shop or to use credit, and so forth. At every turn we are giving out information about ourselves which is fed into computers, computers with back doors and inherent ‘links’ or leaks between databases to serve marketing and or government purposes. Hence Dataveillance.

How else do you suppose that you get so much junk mail with your name on it? One CIA front (two fronts, actually, one here and one in Europe), as I document in my book, the Professional Paranoid Defensive Field Guide  offer to sell information on 98% of American adults. The other two percent have already dropped out of the system. Why should government intelligence agencies be in the business of spying on you and then selling your little ones and zeros for a profit? Do something about it, and drop out. Let them sell just zeros, if they can.

If you elect to remain in the System, if and when they want to reach out and get you for some reason, they will know right where you are, that very moment. Their data will let them profile you psychologically and predict your actions (as described in the Department of Defense’s original RFP White Paper for the TIAO). Don’t answer that knock at the door… you don’t want what they are selling. And you won’t be able to run at that point, because they can freeze all your financial assets, and in some cases, can remotely disable your car, and in all cases, turn resources such as your cell phone against you. It will be too late, then.

Proactive and preemptive tactics are what you need.

To preempt, disengage yourself from the system. When someone drops out of the system, the overhead of the system is actually increased to a degree, but the funding thereof is reduced. This causes subtle instability within the system which impacts the remainder of those still within the system. By deliberately weakening the system in this way, the New World Order is forced to become less transparent, and more domineering, more visible to those who have not yet seen that particular light. It compounds like interest as more and more people figure out they should exit.

Thus, more persons will exit, recruiting others as they go; the cycle will continue to the point where the system must either fail, or seek to seize absolute control sooner than it otherwise intended, before they are ready to do so with full confidence of victory. A shift in balance of power is achieved, the stronger side left unstable and off balance, giving the weaker side a chance to make significant gains with smaller efforts. The domino effect, slow motion though it will seem, at first.

Dropping out is fairly easy — just stop playing the game. Take actions which reduce your exposure to their ever evolving control matrix, and which free you up for further actions at reduced risk. Risk tends to lessen with time as you get better at living off the grid. Most of these things are very easy to do, and have little true risk, but may represent major inconveniences or social roadblocks up front.

You may likely face serious decisions about how you execute such a plan, and to what extent you are willing to go to make it happen. Fortunately, it need not be an overnight matter, which means you can ease into it over several months time, perhaps a few years (presuming we have that much time remaining). Just know that for every cost you are willing to bear up front, the benefits to which it leads tend to be far more valuable in the final analysis. The more steps you manage to accomplish, the easier are the remaining steps.

This ends the introduction to Step Two. What follows in the next segment are a series of suggested guidelines or action options to actually be effective doing it. Some of them you simply might not care for, or accept as viable or workable with respect to their goals or your personal circumstances. Don’t feel you need to follow these suggestions any more than you need to ‘play their game.’ After all, it is about free will choice; God’s greatest gift to Man short of life itself.

And that’s exactly what we are trying to stop the New World Order from ending: Free Will.

What are the tools of the New World Order?

Next up: How to War With the New World Order (Drop Out Checklist)

Statistics Prove Gun Control No Solution; a Political Ruse


Statistics prove gun control is no solution; gun violence is a political ruse.

Taking away guns does not stop psychiatric care-sponsored killings: pseudo science and drug industry profits are the real killer

by H. Michael Sweeney, copyright © 2012, all rights reserved. Permissions to duplicate in full with all links and credits in tact hereby granted, provided they point to proparanoid.wordpress.com and include this notice.
Was Sandy Hook Shooting a multiple shooter conspiracy?
Updated 4/10/13: Proof media and government don’t want you to know the truth and employ disinfo tactics instead, re ‘gun control.’ Changes and pointers to related material indicated with RED TEXT.

Reading this post you will learn

1)   Statistics show the worst shooters are victims of mind altering drugs given under ‘psychiatric care’ with poor or no supervision;
2)   They also show that when denied access to guns, people find more gruesome means to kill, even in mass murder;
3)   That such drugs have a history tied to CIA mind control research in a class I call mind control enabling psychotropics;
5)   That the ONLY winner in gun control is tyranny.
Who is lying about the guns used in Sandy Hook, and why?
Official portrait of George H. W. Bush, former...

Official portrait of George H. W. Bush, former President of the United States of America. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Portrait of DoD Mr. J. Danforth Quayle, Vice P...

USAF portrait of Vice President J. Danforth Quayle (Wikipedia photo)

Update: The mass murder attempt in Texas yesterday employing a knife and response by media proves a couple of key points regarding the validity and reasons behind gun control efforts. Additionally, Mr. Sorento, Presidential pretender, is blindsiding Congress and the public when he gives speeches on gun control.

1) There are a rash of ‘copy me’ mainstream news articles using the same exact text/images/headline claiming that mass knife attacks are RARE according to experts. Other media have at least reworded the same message, but remain parroting an official line. This is blatantly false as the statistics show, below, marked now in Red. This blog has cited more than 20 examples of mass murders or attempts using weapons other than guns, specifically to point out that taking away guns does not stop murderers.

2) Other articles and news sources (TV/Radio) are trying to spin the knife attacks in support of gun control by offhand remarks such as ‘If he had used a gun, there would have been more deaths.” Perhaps so, but who is to say his intent was to actually kill — else he would have chosen a weapon with a longer blade. More to the point, if students had been allowed to conceal carry, HE would have been dead with reduced bloodshed of innocents.

3) Sorento gives his speeches before a 100% manufactured crowd of supporters with absolutely no opposing viewpoints allowed, This gives the illusion that NO ONE in their right mind could possibly disagree. This is result of his illegal quashing of 1st Amendment Rights by signing the so-called Federal Buildings and Grounds Restrictive Act. This Law allows Police to eject, even arrest anyone who protests on government property or anywhere near events where government officials are appearing publicly. This is nothing less than subtle disinfo blind siding. End update.

Arguing to take away guns ‘that have no use to a hunter’ is to ignore the fact that the 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with hunting, and everything to do with insuring government does not abuse their power over the people. It is intended to be a form of checks and balances to tyranny, and nothing less.

We clearly need it now more than ever, given the rapid loss of freedoms to government’s paranoiac response to ‘terrorism,’ a crime of questionable attribute, at best, and one which kills fewer Americans than results from wrongful deaths at the hands of law enforcement.

My idea of gun legislation, therefore, is to give me the right to pack a government provided SAM missile launcher and Apache helicopter, not merely some bolt-action rifle I pay for at my own expense — in part because pistols and single shot rifles do little to deter soldiers able to pick you off from a distance with their sniper rifles… and DHS is spending billions to stockpile enough ammunition to kill everyone in North America, including some 9 million rounds of sniper bullets. I have to ask why, and fear the answer is the T-word.

Why does the government want to take your guns away? Martial Law is why.

Lets be clear

No one wants to take away from the legitimate concerns of victims of senseless murders of innocents as underscored so horribly in the recent rash of mass shootings. It is right to be angry and to grieve with introspective analysis and to seek a solution to prevent such heinous acts as so painfully evident in the massacre of children and adults in Connecticut. And all Americans and people elsewhere in the World are victims, too… we all are forced to suffer some lesser anguish in our compassion for those who lost family members and friends in these events.

But please, do not become yet another kind of victim by taking the bait and blaming guns, not even a particular kind of gun, especially when inconsistencies and the very nature of official statements of evidence suggest either a conspiracy of shooters is being foisted upon us as yet another ‘crazed lone gunman,’ or lies are offered in a conspiracy within government to force gun control upon us… or both.

How, for instance, in Sandy Hook, is it possible for the Coroner to cite to media with law enforcement at his side that everyone was killed by a rifle, when State and local Police had already stated that only handguns were found in the school with the shooter’s body (first, two, then four pistols), and the only rifle found was in the shooter’s locked trunk?

There are other questions, but not as many as found in Aurora’s theater shooting. These kind of nagging ‘conspiracy theory’ questions for which the public deserves to have answers are always ignored, of course, because, ‘they are merely conspiracy theorists’ doing the asking… even when persons of credentials ask. Thus the truth, including the real cause of ‘gun violence,’ is never explained.

Why are there so many ties between Sandy Hook and Aurora?

Right in front of our eyes all along

And yet, the real cause has been right before your eyes the whole time, but deliberately veiled by corporate and government forces allied for varied agenda. I first wrote about the problem in my book, Fatal Rebirth (a four volume look at crimes of the New World Order which predicted Sept. 11 attacks, an assassination attempt which took place, and mass shootings of the kind we face, now, and so much more). I also wrote about it in my books on Political Control Technology, such as MC Realities.

A ten-year research effort for these books, as well as personal family experiences, made it all-too-clear.  It is subsequently verified by statistics and other information you can easily verify for yourself: the real culprit is a thirst for power and control, both financial and political. Their weapon is disinformation, and chemicals. As such, then, it is imperative that we look both at mass shooting events as well as political assassination events; both being used to effect political change against the natural will of the people and course of governments. It is, after all, yet another form of mind control for the masses: change the mood and the will of the people with lies.

Are mass shootings sponsored by the CIA or military?

Start with the Congressional Record

If you are closed-minded about the possibility of mind control and see it as mere tin-foil hat nonsense, then you are already a victim of CIA’s Operation Mockingbird, and should skip this section because you will not wish to be confused by the facts. It might even be harmful to your psyche to learn you have been manipulated by a form of mind control called disinformation, aka propaganda. Mockingbird put thousands of CIA agents directly into media at all levels from management to reporters and anchor persons… to make sure you got all the news that’s fit to distort.

The Church and Rockefeller Commission findings of the 1970s regarding CIA mind control research further revealed all manner of inhumane MC research and non consensual testing on unwitting human subjects. It is clear that among even worse atrocities, CIA was keen to develop drugs that could control a person’s mind to the point that they would do anything commanded, even to kill themselves or others; the Manchurian Candidate, or ‘programmable person.’

There is much more I could write on this topic, but I do not wish to cause readers not open to the notion to stop reading, for there are more important things yet to discuss. I suggest Alex Constantine’s book, Psychic Dictatorship in the USA, for those wanting the gory details, and my book, MC Realities, to learn about the development of psychotropic mind altering drugs (mind control enabling drugs) by Eli Lilly under ex CIA director George Herbert Walker Bush and Dan Quayle as company executives… the very drugs we are about to see quite tied to the type of gun violence of which this article speaks.

When media controls what you think, you are a victim of mind control

Gun violence: Look at the Statistics

The first mass shooting of note in America was the Texas Tower sniper murder of 13 at the University of Texas, Austin, in 1966. From that time forward there have been countless incidents, so many, in fact, that media hardly thinks to look at the big picture, all-too preoccupied with the gory details of the most recent events. Convenient for them and government, perhaps…

…as it does not serve hidden agenda if you compare today with yesterday and learn that there is a pattern of significant relevance which is clearly being withheld from you. You make your decisions based on the colored view of blood-red tinted glasses fitted with blinders of ‘current news.’ There is a reason I call it the Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Media Complex. What makes you think ‘free press’ has anything to do with American media, a media largely controlled by less than a dozen people, exactly as the Congressional Record cited to be all that was needed to control the press. The statistics will reveal it all…

SSRI medication was developed by CIA as a mind control enabling drug

What mass shootings and assassination events have in common:

It is so rare to find otherwise, that I dare say every such shooting has many, if not all, of the same key ingredients in place: a) prior psychiatric care involving the use of prescribed mind-altering drugs (pscyhotropics, generally of the SSRI variety — Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors such as Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, and dozens of others); b) a triggering event based on emotional stress or trauma or the curtailing of or failure in treatment processes, such as failing to take medication or overdosing; and in all-too-many cases, c) the otherwise ‘coincidental’ peripheral presence in their lives of military, CIA, or other persons, firms, or organizations associated in some way with mind control technology.

Note: there is another kind of triggering event for the Machurian Candidate style of programmed shooter, the kind of person used as a disposable patsy, because they tend not to be very effective as actual killers. The best example is, perhaps, Sirhan Sirhan, who emptied his gun at Robert Kennedy but hit him, not, according to modern forensic review: Kennedy was shot from behind, and upward. Such persons are programmed in advance to do a specific thing upon hearing or reading a select unusual triggering phrase.

Such phrases are offered once to cause them to pay attention (throws a mental switch). It is then subsequently repeated twice close together to cause them to carry out the instructions (initiates a command sequence). Interesting, then, that in Sandy Hook, that a particular Web set published the following phrase three times, once as title, and twice in the text: “Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre.”

This was published on the same day as the Aurora shooting, in which the film, The Dark Knight Rises, shows a map of the villain’s attack plans with Sandy Hook (a district of Gotham City renamed to Sandy Hook for the film, for some unknown reason) as the place next to be struck. And yet, it is strange things like this which get us conspiracy theorists labeled as ‘nuts’ by media that you might be more comfortable in ignoring us, instead of thinking for yourself. How comfortable are you, right now?

The rush to gun control serves the NWO agenda for a one World government

SSRI drugs cause violent thoughts and deeds as side effects

SSRI drugs are killers, both by suicide and by murderous acts committed by those taking them. There is a remarkable summary of this phenomenon at ssristories.com, a Web site which just a few years ago listed perhaps only 50 or 60 examples, but today cites about 5,000 cases which illustrate the problem. The link sorts them by the general nature of the case, but you can sort by date or location, or any other heading.

A quick review reveals some startling examples, which I shall first outline in terms of the dangerous aspects of the drug class and its propensity for sponsoring unchecked violence in patients, and then more specifically relate to mass murders and assassinations, gun violence ahead of other forms of murder.

Why do ‘scientists’ and ‘doctors’ of excellent educational qualifications fail to realize, in light of these known side effects: every physical person has a unique physiology, DNA, and dietary makeup, and thus, it is impossible to predict the results of a given infusion of chemicals into a body where, especially in the brain, the EXISTING balance of chemical makeup is not prepared to suffer alterations with kindly result. Why then, do they persist on guessing at initial dosage levels, and then upping the ante when results are not deemed adequate, until side effects make it clear the med will not help, and then switch them to another med, and start all over again? It is witchcraft-level insanity, and it is guaranteed to have negative outcome.

It is NOT science, nor is it MEDICINE.

It is important to realize even this massive list is only a tip of the iceberg. It ONLY represents reports by family members, doctors, organizations, and other select researchers who were examining and reporting purely from the medical viewpoint. Further, as many of the reports are voluntary contributions, it represents only reports from people who happened to learn of the Web site’s existence and who were moved to report, and, moreover, is limited to reports from people who came to realize the relationship of events to the drug. For this reason, you will not find mentions of assassinations of note, such as my research indicates should be included (name ANY assassination attempt in modern American history, and you will likely find it true).

Among the reports (and a couple of details from my own research) we find court rulings and law enforcement investigative findings which frequently place the blame squarely on the drugs, and not the violent person, in some cases causing the courts not to elect punishment — even for capital crimes involving death. Here is your summary of drug induced violence:

Suicides are very convenient in a conspiracy

Let’s talk suicides:

1)   Over 250 reports involve suicides only, and many times that number include suicide as aftermath to other violence, such as arson, murder, and so forth. Suicide is almost the norm after such drug-caused violence;

2)   One attorney reports he has had a total of 73 calls about suicides from just one specific SSRI;

3)   Indiana county study shows 41% of all suicides involved SSRIs

4)   Wisconsin study shows 54% of teen suicides involved SSRIs

5)   Sweden study shows 52% of women suicides involved SSRIs

6)   Report shows US military suffers 18 suicides a day, 40% on SSRIs

7)   Multiple reports of suicide pacts where all participants were on SSRIs

8)   Another 200 questionable deaths listed which may have been suicides.

9)   EVERY SSRI lists suicidal thoughts as a side effect

10) Suicide attempts often involve the most painful and horrific, and least effective means, such as blow torch, grinders, etc., or the most illogical, such as trying to jump out of an airliner, or stripping naked and wandering off into a winter wilderness.  Suicide by Cop is quite popular, as are head-on and other fatal car crashes, for which statistics are likely quite under reported.

Manchurian candidate murderers are always ruled as acting alone

Let’s talk murders:

 1)   Over 1,200 reports of murder attempts, about one fourth of them followed by suicide or attempts;

2)   Within one week of returning home, nearly a dozen soldiers on SSRIs killed their wives;

3)   Methods vary widely: when guns were not available, almost any means might be employed, including additional reports under other categories, such as vehicular homicide, arson, and so forth (roughly another 100 cases). Details follow.

 Conspiracy must exist if there is a cover up in place

Of interest (or no interest, really) to TSA and FAA:

1)   Nearly two dozen incidents involving violence on an airplane or at an airport;

2)   Individual reports of eleven private plane crashes killing 24 people blamed on SSRIs;

3)   Airline Industry study reveals 100 crash pilots using SSRIs;

4)   At least one hijacking was initiated by an SSRI user.

 No one goes ‘crazy’ without some triggering event – contrived or coincidental

How about kidnapping and hostage taking?

 1)   About twenty instances linked to SSRIs;

2)   Seven instances involve schools and students as victims.

 When you hear ‘lone shooter,’ think ‘conspiracy cover up.’

How about arson and bombing?

 1)   80 arson events, three involving schools, two events where school administrators on SSRI set fires at home;

2)   35 bombing instances, two involving schools.

 CIA lies to put their own men in post of Chief, Spokesperson, and head of Internal Affairs

Other Killing Sprees?

 1)   Remember the rash of US Postal Worker rage shootings? Most were SSRI;

2)   About two dozen instances of fast food chains, trains and busses, churches, banks and other offices, and even a country club and a nursing home;

3)   More than 30 incidents at schools, about 1/3rd of which were SSRI, including virtually every event which made national or international news;

 Gun control is a codeword for police state control

And when there is no gun available?

 1)   One 17 year old holds 20 children and teacher hostage at point of a sword. So if you take all the guns, better get all the swords, too;

2)   A Mother attacks her son with a sword. See what I mean?

3)   School day care center looses two children and an adult to a knife attack. After all, knives are just short swords, right? So, if you are going to take away larger gun clips, but not small, then we presume you would take swords, but no knives. What did you gain?

4)   A woman laughs as she uses her car to chase down three kids at an elementary school. Alright, so now no one can own a car, right?

5)   Man attacks 11 kids and 3 teachers with a machete. See what I mean?

6)   Numerous fires started with intent to kill people in apartments, stores, offices, and schools. Starting to get the idea?

7)   The johnstonsarchieve.net Web site lists these additional incidents (scroll to events with ‘criminal’ cited instead or ‘terrorism’) with no known tie to SSRI drugs, but are cited here because the killers had no guns:

    1. Bath Michigan man uses dynamite to kill 40 children, himself, and the School Superintendant over inability to pay school taxes causing foreclosure of his farm. So if you take all the guns, better also take all the materials used to make explosives;
    2. Poe Elementary playground attacked by man with bomb in suitcase killing himself, his son, the Principal, a custodian, two other students, and injuring 17 other children. See what I mean?
    3. 63 students and adults were burned to death by an angry student at a school dance in Goteborg, Sweden (gun control in Sweden is strict). So if you take all the guns, better take all the gasoline and matches;
    4. 67 teen students died from an arson attack on the dorm at Kyanguli Secondary School in Machakos, Kenya, injuring 19 others. See what I mean?
    5. The Elementary School of Ikeda, Japan, lost 8 students and another 13, including two teachers, were injured by a man with a kitchen knife (there is total gun control in Japan);
    6. 72 kindergarten students and teachers at Zhanjiang City, China, became dangerously ill from rat poison put in their salt by a competing school operator (there is total gun control in China). So now there can be no household poisons?
    7. That same year, 2002, two men upset with contract provisions with Number One High School in Changed, China, put rat poison in breakfast food making 195 children and teachers seriously ill. See what I mean?
    8. Two years later, Number Two High School in Ruzhou, China, suffers an attack by a man who kills 8 and injures 4 students with a knife while they sleep in three separate dormitories;
    9. And yet the next year, a man who had lost his job, again in Zhanjiang, attacks several Nansoon Middle School students with a kitchen knife, injuring 8;
    10. In Jikari High School, Yamaguchi, Japan, a student threw a homemade bomb made from nails and emptied firecrackers into a classroom, injuring 58 students and the teacher. Might as well do away with the 4th of July celebration, anyway, since you are getting rid of the Constitution and Bill of Rights;
    11. In 2010, a man killed three students, and a teacher, and injured 20 other children and staff at the kindergarten of Zibo, China, once more with a knife;
    12. Another machete attack took place in the 5th grade class of the Talisayan Elementary School, Xamboanga City, Philippines, killing one student, a teacher, and a grandfather of a student, and injuring 4 more students and two teachers (gun control in the Philippines is near total);
    13. If you wish more examples, there are thirty more at the bottom of this wikipedia link on list of rampage killers, including at least two alleged deliberate crashing of passenger jets. So let’s put TSA and the FAA out of work and ban aircraft. After all, you do want to protect people from violence, right? That really IS your motive for taking away guns, RIGHT? Sorry… I didn’t hear your answer.

 If you do not own a gun, you do not own your government

And what about when other citizens nearby ALSO have guns…

…the guns they want to take away from you and me? The news of such events that does not make endless headlines because it does little to support gun control wishes of those who seek total control over an unarmed public? A mention the day it happens is as good as it gets, as a rule. Thanks for much of this compilation by gunwatch.blogspot.com:

 1)   A 1995 mass murder for drug effort was spoiled in Muskegon, MI, when the store owner, despite being shot four times in the back, managed to use his own gun to scare off druggies who had planned to kill everyone in his store;

2)   A 1997 high school shooting in Pearl, Miss., was halted by the school’s vice principal after he retrieved a pistol he kept in his truck;

3)   A 1998 school dance  for Parker Middle School (Edinboro, PA) shooting saw one teacher killed, and anther teacher and two students wounded before a man living next door forced the shooter to surrender by getting the drop on him with his shotgun;

4)   A 1999 gun shop owner with concealed pistol shot a gunman to the ground who had brought 100 rounds of ammo with him to ‘go out in a blaze of glory’ at, of all places, a shooting range in California (a guarantee he would get his wish);

5)   A 2002 shooting at Appalachian School of Law in Grundy, Va., came to an abrupt conclusion after three had been killed and three more wounded —when two students, unbeknownst one to the other, ran to their cars to retrieve firearms and confront the shooter with threat of crossfire;

6)   A 2005 shooting which started at the Smith County Courthouse in Tyler, TX, and involved high-speed pursuit, was ended because of the intervention of Mark Allen Wilson, who had a legal concealed carry weapon. This one did not end as well as the others cited, herein, as Wilson was himself killed by the shooter, who was wearing a bullet-proof vest. However, the exchange of fire allowed Police who had been kept at bay to end the matter with fatal shots of their own. This was after the shooter had already killed his ex-wife and wounded his own son, and wounded three lawmen in the melee;

7)   A 2007 gunman attempting to kill parishioners of the New Life Church in Colorado Springs was only able to kill two before being shot by an armed retired Policeman who had changed his mind about going to church that day because of a previous like attack on a church in Ogden the prior week;

8)   A 2007 mall shooter in Utah, after killing five and wounding four, was shot dead by an armed off-duty police officer;

9)   A 2008 shooting in an Israeli School (the Mercaz HaRav massacre) was ended by shots from a student and off-duty policeman using personal weapons, who entered the school with such intent after hearing shots which killed 7 teens and one teacher, and wounded ten other students;

10) A 2008 Winnemucca tavern shooting was ended after two deaths when the shooter, while reloading, was shot dead by a patron with a concealed carry permit;

11) A 2009 workplace shooting in Houston, Texas, was halted by two coworkers who carried concealed handguns;

12) A 2009 College Park party was interrupted by two gunmen who counted ten guests and then counted bullets to insure they had enough. After separating the Men and Women one of them started to rape one of the women, but was ‘coitus interruptus’ by shots from her boyfriend, who killed one and drove off the other gunman;

13) A 2009 restaurant robbery attempt by two gunmen Anniston, AL, was thwarted when one of them threatened the life of a patron who was hiding, only to be shot dead by the customer, who had also prepared his concealed pistol for possible use. A few shots were then exchanged with the second gunman, who was critically wounded;

14) That same year, a convenience store in Richmond, VA, was  robbed at gunpoint, the clerk being shot and wounded, and other patrons being shot at before the robber was shot dead by a patron with concealed carry permit.

15) A 2010  Mills, N.Y., shooting incident where the gunman, an angry customer, intended to kill six employees (he had a ‘death list’ of their names) of a cell phone store was, after opening fire on his first victim, himself shot dead by an armed off duty policeman with concealed weapon.

16) A 2012 RV park shooting incident in Early, Texas, was ended by a resident with his pistol as the gunman, after killing two people and their dogs, then held Police at bay with his scope equipped rifle;

17) A 2012 church shooting in Aurora, Colo., was stopped by a member of the congregation carrying a gun.

I leave you with two things, the first being: In Australia, where total gun control has been enacted (confiscation to establish an almost completely unarmed public), in 2011 there were STILL 94,000 shootings that took 29,000 lives… with not one civilian able to defend themselves. In America, the one spot where gun violence is rated worst, oddly enough, is the District of Columbia. Let’s compare:

There, the 2011 death rate by firearms was 12 deaths per 100,000 population, and that’s in a country where gun ownership is 89 guns per 100 adults. Compare that to Australia where it is now roughly 6 guns per 100 (est. by using UK provided figures), where deaths are 131 per 100,000.  Does that sound like gun control works as proponents claim?

To get that information in media, of course, I had to go to England, because the American press won’t tell you the truth about such things. They got their information from FBI, which any US paper or news network could just as easily have done… but actual investigative reporting would not help government take away your gun, would it?

The second is this: Out of 10,650 murders by gunmen in Virginia, only 4 were by persons who had legally registered with concealed carry permits.  Criminals don’t need or seek permits, of course. These four deaths by legitimate ‘gun toters’ would seem somewhat balanced by the fact that there are about as many instances, the most recent being the Clackamas Mall shooting… where persons with concealed weapons elected NOT to use their gun to shoot at gunmen engaged in murder because they did not feel they could safely do so without risking hitting innocent persons in the line of fire, or return fire hitting such persons behind them. That is part and parcel of good gun handling safety training, which all firearms owners should be required to have: my idea of a ‘gun control law’ that might actually work some good.

But personally, I’d rather have open carry… I’d even be moved to wear a six gun and cowboy hat if the 1875 Colt .45 hadn’t been stolen from my family some years back (when I did wear it in public on occasion). Open carry is a silent and untold deterrent to gun violence. In Cuba, there is no standing army, because every capable citizen serves in the Defense Force (like the National Guard), and is issued an AK-47, side arms (many people pack), and even grenades. Result: LOW CRIME, and very few murders by these weapons. The same is true in Switzerland (different weapons, of course), so it has nothing to do with Communism, that it works.

Statistically, in the Old Wild West where wearing a gun was the norm, gun violence was also relatively low… (e.g., the murder rate per capita in Abilene was lower than any modern US city, today). There have probably been more shooting victims in TV and movie westerns than in real life in the old West. When almost everyone has a gun, politeness rules; even when confronting someone in an unpleasant situation, it was done with carefully chosen words.

SIR, I believe that Ace up your sleeve proves you are a card cheat — and the pot is therefore mine, unless you wish to object?” Given the choice, most villains would back down unless the odds were significantly in their favor… which gun control laws will surely provide them, one 2nd Amendment-eroding law at a time.

25 Questions No One Has Asked About the Aurora Shooting (pt 3)


There are always little things that go wrong in a crime…  James Holmes compared to JFK things that betray the lies with a screaming truth

Updaate May 14, 2012: Yesterday, I posted an update of significant importance regarding discovery that a key witness, Eric Hunter, had either lied or was majorly confused about key details, and appears to have a significant motive for lying. Further, his interview appears to involve network falsehoods and cover up actions. This was not the first update to the post, but it was the most important due the shocking nature of implications.
 
Apologies, but there were a series of problems encountered attempting to offer that update. People deserve accuracy and want to be comfortable with reasons for changes, so I try to be explicit in detailing reasons and leave older information in tact, as well. However, attempts at perfecting the complex edit (it impacted many areas of analysis) resulted in undetected wordpress malfunctions or incorrect operation by myself. Whatever the problem, it got worse in attempting to rectify with a new edit, and appears to have caused at least 25 or so readers to visit expecting to find the update, but finding a much older version which pre dates all updates.
 
There is some possibility this was due to a hack. I simply cannot tell, but the other clue is that the last several edits in the revision history at wordpress are a jumbled mess and unusable. So here am I now posting a single reconstructed edit attempting to rectify all ills and show the impact of Hunter’s folly, reflected in red text, but based on salvaging material from multiple revision history versions. This will not likely be a precise match to any of the updated versions, but will be a better, easier to read version as it will reflect only one update. I’ve also elected to use brown text to reflect material no longer valid as result of Hunter. I apologize for any inconvenience or confusion this may have caused.
 
Our review continues from PARTs I and II, by H. Michael Sweeney, Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved. No reproduction permissions will be granted for the first 90 days. Links only, please.
 
In review: This in-depth series of posts will reveal startling new investigative issues for the first time, anywhere. The detail required to make concise arguments on a long list of critical elements forces it to be offered in installments. In fulness, you will discover:
  • Three motives for making James Holmes a Patsy with Fascism as benefactor, and two possible motives for targeting Century Theaters
  • Easy link access to the key-most videos and images for each critical point of evidence presented in a logical, easy to follow order.
  • Reasoning there were at least three additional helpers involved in a professional black operation backed up by even more supporting players
  • Introduction of an actual political REASON for targeting The Dark Knight Rises (TDKR), a reason which fits one of the proposed motives
  • 25 key questions missed by almost everyone, the answer to any one of which could easily provide reasonable doubt that it was a lone gunman event
  • A walk-through narrative portraying an alternate scenario which fits all  conflicting facts into a workable reality.

 James Holmes was a patsy Part Three

James Holmes was a patsy

Was aurora shooting a CIA or DOD job?

If you missed part two, click here, or start with part one

QUESTION 16: How did CBS News know about ‘buckets of ammunition’ in James’ apartment before anyone could look into the apartment? Review the timeline found at Huffington Post (a good timeline to review because it shows also how the story unfolded on the Web and television, which can be useful in answering some questions regarding confusing or conflicting information, and yet raises new questions, as well). There we find CBS reports confirmation at 9:01 AM that morning (Friday, the 20th) that the apartment is booby trapped. They clearly describe it as happening at the present time, and that it will take some time to gain access; the Bomb Squad will have to clear the apartment before investigation can begin.

But wait. The timeline also says CBS News’ Bob Orr reported in tweets three hours earlier (6:07 AM) stating that‘Buckets of ammunition’ were found in the shooter’s apartment.

The timeline further states that the apartment was not cleared by the Bomb Squad until 1:58 PM the FOLLOWING DAY. Channel nine’s Jace Larson tweets with photos the first fire trucks as arriving at 4:42 AM that following day, and we know from video of that day that that’s when Police were able to inspect the apartment using a Ladder truck, also used to break out the window for robots to be inserted. How did CBS learn about buckets of ammunition, and what was their source? The timeline is either missing some key details, or this illustrates some Wag-the-Dog effort undertaken with an error in timing or flawed execution, or worse — prior knowledge.

QUESTION 17: Why did the shooter try to get into theater 10 after leaving 9?

Update :  Thanks to an alert reader with first-hand knowledge, (see reader comments at page bottom), we now know the witness, Eric Hunter, lied (Caveat in order, further down in the chain of update material); the two theaters do not share a common hallway. Here is my original text based on his statements to media, and media accounts based on his remarks.

EXITs in theaters 9 and 10 share the same hallway to the outside. Witness Eric Hunter in an interview on ABC news talks about trying to exit 10 via the EXIT where he sees two girls with wounds followed by the shooter in the exit hallway adjoining with theater 9. Eric helps the girls into theater 10 and holds the door shut as the shooter pounds on it attempting to gain access. Since his gun had jammed and he had switched to and used his pistols, why would the shooter bother?  I’m also wondering how and why two girls would risk running toward and past the shooter to use the EXIT in the first place?

Update continued:  That there is no common hallway can be illustrated to the reader’s satisfaction by review of two different kinds of facility plans for the theater, here, and here, one of them showing the actual emergency exit paths as required by law. Moreover, I’ve uncovered several motives to presume him lying, including implications of media complicity and cover up (ABC News):

a)  In an official ABC follow up interview, Eric states that bullets were coming through the wall in 10, which no other witness so states, and as we have questioned, based on where the Shooter was standing when shooting, in order to shoot into 10 he would have had to turn the gun to a wall immediately to his left, with no one present to shoot at, there. He had already fired a shot into the air which caused people to flee to the aisles. He need only open fire in one direction to hit anyone who might have originally been seated anywhere near the wall shared with 10. He subsequently did turn his gun at an angle toward theater 8 to shoot at people in the  far exit row, and some rounds did go through that wall, but there was no logical reason for rounds to penetrate 10.

b) In that same interview, he stated he saw blood on the carpet as he descended the steps (so he is saying he was in the balcony). How, in a darkened theater, where the carpets are already red, and illuminated dimly, could he tell a fluid on the carpet was blood as opposed to, say, soda pop or water? All would look darker than the carpet? No one was reported injured in 10, either.

c) Also in the same interview, ABC calls Hunter a ‘hero,’ for saving two girls lives and essentially confronting the Shooter when, in point of fact, we now know he is lying (caveat to follow). Turns out Hunter is running for a political post as Councilman, and further bills himself as a rapper and actor on his Facebook page. Being a hero couldn’t hurt any of those aspirations. This speaks to motive. Learn about this in this very interesting video.

d) That same video seems to offer compelling evidence that Hunter’s interview was not shot when and where claimed, or as it appeared. Based on Hunter’s own Facebook pages, again, a self-shot picture of himself in what sure looks like a very large TV studio with blue screen wall behind him. He has exactly the same shirt and necklace, and day’s beard growth in both that snap and the interview. Blue screens and green screens are used to mat people into video backgrounds not actually present. Green is more common than blue, which pre dates green.

e) The original interview, as alluded to in the ABC follow up interview, is no longer available. ABC for some reason, though they never have before for any other story or even other Aurora related YouTubes, ordered YouTube to pull multiple copies of that interview (only), even terminating the account of the poster. That link (here again for your convenience) so indicates. This is rather odd given that use of news footage for YouTube commentaries falls under legal Fair Use. What was on the first video that further conflicts with the second? Or is there some material fact revealed which is far more serious than a lying politician?  End of update, this section, more below.

QUESTION 18: Why was James so calm when arrested… even to appear drugged at his first court appearance? People thought him a zombie with no understanding of reality. Some accounts say he repeatedly asked “Why am I here?” and he was clearly not paying much attention and even seemed to fall asleep briefly at one point. The answer offered by Dianne Sawyer on ABC news would seem a feeble attempt to explain, stating that James told Police he was so calm because he had taken Vicodin. But the effectiveness of this drug is stated to last only 4-8 hrs. for most users, and does NOT cause a drugged stupor in normal doses. Medical advice states that most a given person could take would be six, but it cause them to vomit everything up, or they would die. So this can in no way explain his stupor at his arraignment or his confusion in jail. Where did Sawyer get her facts?

QUESTION 19: Why did James mail specific plans for his assault to his Psychiatrist at the University such that it arrived well before the day of the event? Fox News reports it as mailed July 12. That would mean it arrived several days before the shooting.  To do so risks the operation being uncovered and thwarted. It would have been more logical to drop it in the mail on the way to the theater. Are we to believe James planned the operation for months with exacting detail in every other matter but this one?

QUESTION 20: Why did the Psychiatrist to whom James mailed the notebook initiate a call about a suspicious package which was NOT the packages sent by James, and which therefore resulted in them finding James’ package? Fox News says the first package was slipped under the Doctor’s door and she did not recognize the name on the package, and so called Police. If you choose to buy that as sufficient reason, fine… but then why did Police subsequently decide to then sweep the entire mailroom and find the actual package sent by James? Alex Jones has intimated (and I concur) that it seems as if such a package was expected as part of a conspiratorial plot to make a nice and tidy case, but once it had gone missing, steps were taken to insure it was recovered.

QUESTION 21: Why was everyone in James Holmes Life involved in government projects and agencies associated with Political Control Technology, or the keymost elements, thereof, Psychiatry and the military? That term (PCT) is the polite description for mind control. Take a look. James’ Father, Dr. Robert Holmes, previously worked for HNC Software, a firm contracting to DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Project Agency) to develop ‘cortronic neural networks’ for interfacing with the human brain. His Grandfather was Lt. Col. Robert Holmes, who based on his military history, was likely involved in military intelligence, who are client to PCT science. His Mother is a psychologist.

James himself was a recipient of a Grant through NIH (National Institute of Health) Neuroscience at the Universtity of Colorado’s Anschutz Center, formerly the U.S. Army’s Fitzsimons Medical Center, where military research of this sort was undertaken. Previously, James was a research assistant with the Salk Institute at the University of California, which in turn was partnering with DARPA to help develop ‘Peak Soldier Performance’ through chemical enhancements impacting the brain and physiology. The project there also included brain-machine interfaces quite related to the type of work at HNC where James’ Father worked.

At the school, James was seeing a psychiatrist, Dr. Lynne Fenton, who worked at the school. SHE is the one who called Police regarding the non dangerous package mentioned above. She is an ex-USAF Doctor who holds both a Medical (MD) and Psychiatric degree. She had also warned the school in writing that she felt James was a threat to others, but no action resulted. A psychiatrist is obligated under doctor-patient relationships not to divulge information about clients unless a danger to themselves, or others, but in such cases, they are to contact authorities (State Mental Health). I know of no reason they would be allowed to tell an employer, instead — unless to deliberately bolster a cover story.

This was to be a breaking point to the Fourth Part, but it will instead be a three part article… so here is the rest of it:

James Holmes set up by Men in Black 

And if you dig deeply enough into a conspiracy…  James Holmes compared to JFK assassination you might just find a Clay Shaw

 

 James Holmes was a patsy Part Four (final)

James Holmes was a patsy

Was aurora shooting a CIA or DOD job?

QUESTION 22: Why and how was a child killed behind the theater and not discussed by Police? The press talks about a six year old girl killed in the theater, and we have a 13 year-old girl who tried to save her, but couldn’t. This is clearly not the same child. Warning: This material is graphic and unsettling.

You can hear Police finding the girl on the dispatch audio (at 6:00 in). There is chilling evidence of it all at the rear of the theater with the second gun and gas mask (photo); the shoes and the blood, but there is no chalk outline. The audio implies the victim may be alive at this time (we can hope), but the blood loss is phenomenal for a child, and such a wound would be fatal in moments.  A pair of child’s sandals, the color common for little girls lays with the gun right at the Exit, and a trail of blood with splatter patterns suggesting a major wound to arteries… runs between doorway area and almost all the way to the gas mask. A lone, crazed gunman out of ammunition would care nothing about anyone exiting the theater behind him. But the visual evidence tells a different story: the shooter appears to have dropped his gun, grabbed a little girl, who in struggling lost her shoes, and broke free. The rest is not a pretty picture, but it can only be told as deductive conjecture:

Photo analysis suggests she ran down the sidewalk chased by the killer, who was seen and reported by Police as a ‘man in a gas mask.’ They do not mention seeing the girl, perhaps because their view was blocked by vehicles in the parking lot. But the shooter must have pulled his gas mask off to see better near the corner of the building, and dropped it, probably to make easier recapture of the girl. He could not kill her there, as it would raise questions, so once corralled, he carried her back toward the doorway where Police found her near the exit door by James’ car. We have audio of that find in Police Dispatch recordings. Recall the gun was left behind, testimony it was indeed out of ammunition. Still struggling with the girl as he went, he had to drop the gas mask along the way to retrieve a knife, which he used. You can see the blood splatters which give testimony. It is these which we must analyze…

Trail of dried blood. See text for analysis of splatters, but not if you just had a meal

I am not a forensics specialist in blood splatters, but I have done photo analysis of varying technical natures in both the military and in civilian employ. Yet the splatters do quite easily suggest some things which seem rather obvious to me: While we can hope it merely a serious wound in the foot area, or that blood streamed down her leg to her feet, my take is that he cut her throat and let her hang in his arms before him as he went, with her head down. At every pace, but without any differences suggesting left-right foot pattern, are the tell-tale blood splatters of two spurts of blood giving testimony to her last remaining terror-filled heart beats.

Each splatter appears almost equal to a spilled top half of a cup of coffee in volume, and there are 18 groupings ending in some larger pools — estimated equal to about 4 pints of blood. An adult only has 10-12 pints max and usually dies if they loose 3-4 pints. These groupings appear as if interrupted in distance by steps of the killer, which would have caused the body to swing toward the next splatter location. They are so well defined that it appears her head was rather close to the ground. The blood spurts toward the door and away from the gas mask, so her body was facing the door and being carried in that direction as she died. They don’t quite make it all the way back to the door before they diminish, suggesting loss of blood pressure. Even if we prefer to think her actually running with a foot wound or blood trailing down her legs, she was starting to black out. Tragic and disgusting, either way.

Also, some Web posts include images of the dropped gas mask where the person posting claims it to show a discarded knife. I do not find them clearly revealing of that fact (blurry), but only suggestive of it. But to chase, kill, and return a body to a doorway is hallmark of a professional who did not want a witness. Why would James even have cared, if all he was going to do was sit and wait for capture? And given his state of stupor and explanation for calmness, how could he even run in the first place?

On the other hand, if James were NOT the shooter, and merely a patsy, anyone exiting the rear of the theater could not be allowed to give testimony to what they would see: a person who was NOT James exiting via a vehicle which was NOT James’ car, and possibly additional helpers such as a driver or clean up man. THAT is why it was important that someone insure no one used the exits in theaters 8 and 10, and why a little girl had to die. Yet thus far, there is no mention of such a little girl beyond the first discovery by an officer. Why? Why no second girl listed in the injured and dead, not even a Jand Doe? How is it that no parent has come forward to ask, unless the answer be that the parent is among the dead? Was there blood on James’ clothing, and if not, why not?

QUESTION 23: Why did the Police Chief repeatedly dodge questions about security cameras capturing the event, and what do they show? Three times he ignored the question. In point of fact several cameras had a view of the rear of the theater (see photos) and should be able to concretely show the true events. Why no acknowledgement of their existence, much less their content?

QUESTION 24: How did media come to interview Steven Foster, and why did he say what he said? Foster is described in various accounts as ‘an international security expert and former Aurora Police officer.’ Actually, he’s a business man spread too thin among a lot of organizations if you read his bio. And, his security background is… like James’ psychiatrist’s background… from the USAF. Foster has tons of credentials, easily as many as any CIA front man I’ve ever encountered. His security expertise is actually in the area of risk management, and leans to the software side of data security… for customers like the Defense Department. I’m hoping that’s all coincidence, and its not all that unusual. But I’m intrigued that his main Denver business is located only seven miles away from the theater, and like all the locations of interest in the shooting, is just a couple of blocks off a main road which leads directly to the theater. It also enjoys easy access to the theater shooting exercise and is even a bit closer. And there’s more to talk about along that line, but not just yet.

Yes, he worked for the Aurora Police Dept. at one time… briefly. The fellow is quite young for all he’s accomplished, his career suggesting a grooming process. He holds key jobs in a variety of firms across multiple states, just like I find in CIA fronts, but on a slightly smaller scale. So I found myself wondering what prompted media to pick up the phone and hunt him down for this interview.

Well, turns out he’s a paid professional standby media interviewee, just the sort of person that make wag-the-dog a viable mechanism. He’s also a paid professional witness in courtroom proceedings. I’m familiar with such persons. I call them ‘professional spoilers and spinners.’ They are a kind of Agenda Insurance mechanism called in to ‘fix things’. Of course, they could actually speak their true mind if they wanted to, and we might not even be able to tell the difference.

But I’m equally curious about what he said, which certainly fits the role of a spoiler. “I think he came here specifically to disengage, and I think the preparation became the assault at the theater. He had to disconnect in Colorado. There would be too many ways he would be seen or caught. It speaks of his personality and the level of preparation around this. His rationale behind his actions point to someone who wants to be admired or worshiped or revered for being a maniacal maniac.”

Excuse me? Nowhere in any of his background do we see any signs of his expertise in psychology. No Policeman… no security expert… no software peddler… no Board member of any corporation… should normally be considered as such. Yet he renders this wonderfully condemning picture of a mentally ill killer describing his innermost thought processes as if privy to personal interviews or reviews of details for which he could not possibly have knowledge. And media spins it as if authoritative?

Let’s shift focus to what was said, and the contradictions inherent. “I think he came here specifically to disengage…” And to think everyone else thought he came her to go to school. “and I think the preparation became the assault at the theater.” Uh… ‘preparation?’ Preparing to disengage? “He had to disconnect in Colorado. There would be too many ways he would be seen or caught. It speaks of his personality and the level of preparation around this.”

He’s trying to say James was distant to everyone so he could undertake his planning without being caught (which again begs the question, why send those plans to someone before the attack). He then goes on to say, “His rationale behind his actions point to someone who wants to be admired or worshiped or revered for being a maniacal maniac.” Excuse me, but this is psychobabble calculated to paint a picture in the mind of John Q. Public, who never questions talking head sound bites, but simply absorbs their tone and select key words. But I question them: He wants to be admired and worshiped? How does that fit with orange hair which he didn’t even bother to reveal at the theater? Should not he have revealed the hair early in the event, right in the theater, to make himself more famous and worthy of worship?

QUESTION 25: Why was Century Theaters targeted? Assume for a moment that political agenda was afoot by the NWO crowd for any of the three cited motives. If so, they could target any theater chain they wanted. One reason to target a given company over another is any loyalty to the NWO by those in ownership. And just to be clear — that’s not the same as saying they themselves were involved, but neither is involvement precluded from consideration. I illustrate the notion by asking you what company’s trucks are ALWAYS used by terrorists to blow stuff up? I’m sure you instantly said Ryder, and you would be correct. How is such a great ‘coincidence’ possible, when in some cases, competitor rental locations were much closer at hand?

Early on, I asked why, and I think I found the answer. Of all the big national rental agencies (in the industry, they prefer to be called Logistics firms), Ryder is the only one where the principle management are NOT part and parcel of the greater Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Media complex. For each of the other firms, however, key officers and Board members tend to have lots of ties to the military and military contractors, several to the intelligence community, and some to media. Nada for Ryder, at least the last time I checked (OKC Bombing — for which, by the way, my investigative findings resulted in startling revelations missed by everyone else).

So let’s look at Century Theaters and the two others making up the top three ranking chains in America (Century is number three). Century is a bit unique in that its management and theater ownership seems to be made up of a collective of smaller independent chains linking together: rebels against the big corporate firms who set out to be big by running independents out of business with overly competitive pricing and then buying them out for a song. That’s probably an exaggeration, at least some of the time, but it seems close to the mark. Their management is quite similar to that of Ryder: squeaky clean, and no ties to the greater motion picture industry. Moreover, management wise, they are doing a much better job than their competitors, making huge gains in profits this last year, while the others struggled to remain flush.

Number one in America is the Regal group. I find one officer of Regal came directly from a firm serving the Defense industry and the Federal Government; another is tied to MGM as a power player (TDKR was Warner Bros., a competitor to MGM); one comes from FEMA and is a member of a Federal Reserve Bank; one comes from the oil industry going back to Rockefeller oil interests in Pennsylvania, and that firm happens to use the same unique Web Site engine and design layout as Regal, so there is some key relationship in management which is not otherwise visible or stated. What is true, is that botfirms share some of the same major shareholders, but not large enough shares to account for like Web site constructs.

The most interesting and questionable point is that the largest shareholder (38%) in Regal is the Anschutz Investment company. Very interesting, given that the school James was attending was built with Anschutz money, and is thus named, the Anschutz Center. And, if you haven’t guessed it… they are also conveniently located about nine miles away, and three blocks off the same main street (East Colfax) where the Anshutz Center is located, and you know how close that is to the other key locations. Starts to get interesting, does it not?

Who is Anschutz, really? A few folks you’ve heard of… like Qwest (Century Link), U.S. West, Southern Pacific Railway (since acquired by Union Pacific), and other subsidiaries, and some major league sports teams (Kings, Lakers). Anschutz is VERY into media beyond just Regal Theataers, with many divisions in everything from publishing to film making (Chronicles of Narnia was theirs, among others). They also happen to run the corporate side of things (concessionaires) in National Parks (Yellowstone, Grand Canyon, Zion, Crater Lake, Death Valley, Mt. Rushmore, and many more).

But its their managers we should look too as a judge of their nature (the same people are involved in the Foundation and the Corporation, by and large, though they take care to draw distinct lines between them as separate entities and purposes). Only one is of any concern to us, here, and he comes from Enron (CIA front that bilked America) and Bankers Trust (there was that other financial bilking thing), though he not associated with BT in the recent debacle, and not everyone at ENRON knew it was CIA or knew what was going on, or they would have stopped it, right? Besides, BT gave the TARP money back, as it was less than $20 million, and hardly enough to cover executive bonuses. While these things greatly pique my interest, I would be remiss if I did not caution against drawing a negative conclusion with respect to indicating any association with the shooting.

Number two in America is number one in the World, AMC. Their ownership is, well, the Red Chinese Army. That’s right. Bought by China, lock, stock, and barrel. I don’t suppose they would have any motive for wanting to see Americans loose the right to be armed, do you? The purchase did not take place until May of this year, however, and that’s hardly enough time for an intelligence operation to be established, researched, planned, prepared for, and execute anything this fiendish… but that’s also conjecture, and presumes such a contingency operation was not started well before acquisition. In looking at the actual management in place, even after the takeover, they look pretty squeaky clean, too.

What does anschutz have to do with the aurora shooting?

Summary of problems

Too many witness accounts have too many people doing things which reveal more than a single gunman theory can match. Too many facts simply contradict logic and each other. Too many points of evidence scream multiple participants: two guns, two masks, someone had to open the outer door, someone had to hold shut the outer door, someone went into each theater to warn, someone discharged flash bang in the Lobby, and more. Someone had to know there was a simultaneous exercise, and it wasn’t some College kid. If you look at it in terms of Modus Operandi using the JFK assassination as a reference point, it is a classic intel cookie-cutter conspiracy, and looks this way:

Anschutz • The Lobby is our Grassy Knoll, where participants that we are told don’t exist were seen.
Anschutz Medical Center
Anschutz • The inner EXIT door is the Schoolbook Depository where we are expected to focus our attention, when the real zinger is elsewhere (the outer exit door).
Anschutz Investment 
Anschutz • Seegar is Reporter Bob Jackson, the only person who claimed to see a rifle in the Schoolbook Depository window, who pointed,
anschutz x and led us all on the  merry media chase which followed, and which pointed to a lone gunman..
Anschutz Corporation
Anschutz • The little girl is Officer Tibbet who had to die as an unexpected material witness, an unwanted complication to plans.
Anschutz Medical Center
Anschutz • The Car is The Texas Theater where the ‘lone gunman’ was magically found and taken easily.
Anschutz Investment 
Anschutz • The gas mask is the Magic Bullet for which we will hear all manner of creative explanations.
Anschutz Corporation
Anschutz  • The Psychiatrist is Jack Ruby (though a real assassination of Holmes by someone else may yet need transpire if the case starts to unravel).
Anschutz  She shoots Holmes with a call to Police forcing discovery of ‘lone gunman plans,’ just in case Police or media were not to believe he acted alone.
Anshcutz Medical Center
Anschutz  • The man who opened the EXIT door is our Oswald double in front of the Soviet Embassy in Mexico.
Anschutz Investment 
Anschutz  • The Apartment is Guy Banister’s Office where staging, operatives, and key elements were centralized.
Anschutz Corporation
Anschutz • The Bombs in his apartment are much like the Cubans in exile who traversed Banister’s office waiting to explode in war with Cuba.
Anschutz Medical Center
Anschutz • The security cameras are the Zapruder film, which the public didn’t get to see until more than a decade later.
Anschutz Investment 
Anschutz • James’ parents fit the puzzle in a way that Oswald’s Russian wife served, which was to hint at background covert matters. In Oswald’s case,
Anschutz • it helped define him as assassin. In James’ case, it may better define him as convenient patsy.
Anschutz Corporation
Anschutz • James’ participation and background in matters related to Political Control technology mirror Oswald’s work in top secret military radar programs.
Anschutz Medical Center
Anschutz • Judge Sylvester is the Warren Commission, sealing evidence and documents from public access.
Anschutz Investment 
Anschutz • People like me, Jon Rappaport, and other Web-based investigators are subbing for Jim Garrison, looking at the official reports incredulously,
Anschutz • and seeking to get at the truth. We will be doomed, of course, and merely labeled as ‘conspiracy theorist’ so they won’t need address the issues.
Anschutz • They even did that to Jim Garrison, after all
Anschutz Corporation
Anschutz • Anschutz (the Center, Investment company, or Foundation) is the New Orleans World Trade Mart where we may at some point find our Clay Shaw,
Anschutz • who may turn out in the end to be James’ psychiatrist, or even Mr. Foster. In fact, perhaps, we have our Man. One of Foster’s business addresses, recall,
Anschutz • enjoys easy access to the theater, and is even closer with like access to the shooting exercise site. Another business address he maintains is
Anschutz  only three blocks away from Anschutz corporate address in Denver, and in Guy Bannister’s dual-address fashion, yet another is right
Anschutz • around the corner. One of the organizations he cites in his credentials seems to have no presence on the Web or discernible address of any kind,
Anschutz • and yet another which does have Web presence cites no address… but seems to hold its meetings at… the Anschutz campus facility. So, once more,
Anschutz • why did Steven get to say what he said? In my book set Fatal Rebirth, I point out several traits of a CIA front. Clustering and multiple business names,
Anschutz • and address problems are among the many traits. Perhaps I should do more research on Anschutz and Foster. But for now, they are merely enigmas.
Anschutz Medical Center
Anschutz • What we really need right now is our Fletcher Prouty, an insider willing to come forward. I’m right here… waiting.
Anschutz Corporation

There is even a similarity to Oswald’s encounter with Police in the break room after the shooting: The police dispatch tape frequently makes reference to employees being found in the break room at the theater, though I doubt they were involved other than being employees, unlike Oswald. Everything is in place except the three hobos from the train yard. They were probably there but simply not noticed. If you listen to the full audio of the Police radio from Aurora, you get hints there may have been such persons of interest, but unlike Dallas, there was no follow on events which recorded details for posterity. In Dallas, a daytime event, people managed to get their picture.

Comparing James Holmes to JFK Assassination

An Alternate Scenario

All these contradictions can be easily reassembled to make sense without contradiction. And so I will, in chronological order, with hope that James’ defense attorney and family can make use of the information for their own investigative efforts:

This kind of operation would require long-term planning and early-stage steps to insure all elements were in place well before the actual shooting could unfold. Key among them would be putting wheels in motion for the staged theater shooting exercise. Such a project would need to be allowed to develop on its own, and the rest of the operation would need to be tuned to its dictates in loction and date… and someone on the inside would need to be part of the conspiracy, especially to control key details and to gain access to appropriate documentation such as badges, radio frequencies, names of participants, etc..

That, in turn, dictated the need to get James to move to Colorado and take up his position at Anschutz Center, and likely, his apartment close to the theater. If you think about it, arranging the close proximity of the theater, the apartment, the Center, and the location for the parallel ‘theater shooting exercise,’ suggests planning well ahead of anything alleged undertaken by James, especially the later, and one other related location yet to be discussed — by anyone. Such a tight grouping of key related locations does not happen coincidentally. So let’s presume all that done, and weapons and material ordered and delivered, and all such support material is in place. Here are the events which could better explain the conflicting facts.

Comparing James Holmes to JFK Assassination

1) The night before the shooting, James is acquired by one or more Operatives under a ruse or by hypnotic command, or after being sedated. He is taken to a safe house or motel, or may have been directed to go there directly to ‘meet’ someone, that he could be acquired. As result, he, his car, and his apartment are under control of operatives. Work on preparing the apartment booby traps and staging evidence there and in his car can begin at any time. It would be unwise to have multiple persons at James’ home for possible witnessing.

2a) Early in the day well before the theater opens, Jame’s car is driven by Operative A to the theater and parked at the key-most location early enough to insure no one else takes the spot. Two additional cars driven by Operative B and C tag along. One of these parks next to James’ car, nose pointed out, also to protect the spot for subsequent need. The other car provides a ride back for all of them.

2b) The early stages of the nearby staged theater shooting exercise also begin their cover operation for the day, most participants unaware of what is really to happen. All Operatives have suitable ID to illustrate participation in that operation should their cover be blown prematurely. They likely also carry Police Detective ID for any issues arising after the event.

3a) Late that night, tickets already in hand, Operatives A and B enter the theater complex well before show time for TDKR. Likely, this is just before the film in theater 10 is about to end. But while A buys popcorn and a drink and then takes a seat in 9, and waits, B goes directly to theater 10 just as or before the film ends to assure he will find himself alone once patrons exit. When so assured, he immediately takes the EXIT door in theater 10 and waits in the adjoining hallway. Update: we now know there was no adjoining hallway. Therefore, B would have instead have entered 9 early, not 10, and used the exit to arrange for the outer door to be opened for the shooter. THIS IS A CRITICAL POINT: SOMEONE HAD TO OPEN THAT OUTER DOOR FROM THE INSIDE.

3b) The Shooter, already dressed for the role except for headwear, drives a van (Perhaps marked as Police or Security) to the rear of the theater. You may prefer to presume the shooter dressed in the hallway once inside the rear of the theater. That is what the delay in time between the inner EXIT being opened and the Shooter’s appearance was likely intended to make you think. Operative C and James, in sedation or hypnotic control, is with him. He is dressed in identical shooter already preprepared with gunshot residue. His fingerprints are already placed on all the weapons. There may be required yet one other person, either an Operative or James’ Controller, perhaps a mind control psychiatrist. It depends only upon the nature of James’ mind and level of true cognizance.

4a) The van stops in front of James’ car leaving clearance for the second parked car, and the side door opens. Operative C exits and he drives the second car away to the nearest empty space while the Van backs into the now vacant spot.

4b) Operative C, leaves the parked secondary car and makes for the outside fire door while placing a call to Operative B waiting in the hallway. B opens the outer fire door for D, and it is rigged to allow reentry as needed.

4c) James’ is facilitated into his car with one or two Operatives standing watch to warn if anyone approaches, to avoid any awkward appearances which might warrant suspicion. For the purpose, Operative C or the Controller are likely in Police uniform for quick relief of more serious eventualities. This step is allowed a lot of time so that blocks of moments can be chosen for best chance at avoiding unwanted observers.

5a) By now, Seegar and her companion are somewhere in theater 9. But as her story does not fit other accounts, I suspect they were not seated where they claimed, and embellished story details for the sake of getting TV interviews. Or, they may have been Operatives A and B (in proper black overcoat, Seegar’s Sihlouett may have passed for a man’s), or they may indeed be paid actors. For our purposes, here, it matters not.

5b) At the same time or a similar point of progress, the Shooter enters the hallway with a bag containing weapons and head gear. If you favor the notion, the bag or bags could contain his assault clothing so that he could get dressed in the hallway. Add a second shooter here, as well, if you favor that option. Operative B will be with him/them, to help. At some point in the process he calls Operative A, who comes forward and opens the door so that Shooter can render it easy to open from the other side. A returns to the Lobby to wait. Shooter prepares and checks the weapons, and dons the headgear. B takes the empty bag to the van and then circles the building to enter Lobby, where he waits with A.

6) Everyone is in position and holds their places to a set timing mark for their next steps. A and B are in the Lobby. Shooter is in the hallway. Operative C and others are in the parking lot. C braces the outer exit door against any possible use by victims. Another operative may have braced the exit shared by theater 7 and 8, if you wish to so believe. (update: we now know no theaters shared exits, but other operatives may have blocked or at least had men positioned at each exit of adjacent theaters on both sides.) Blocking alone is not the first line of defenses against witnesses, but a failsafe should warnings not to use the exits be ignored. A precise accuracy of sequence is not possible given the level of access to witness statements afforded by the Web, which, being news interviews, generally fail to include references and details useful for the purpose. Regardless…

7a) Shooter enters and throws his smoke grenade. We might presume some one else used a cloth, hat, or glove to pick up the hot grenade and throw it back, or it may be that Operative A or B entered the theater and threw a second Grenade, and then retreated back into the Lobby. Operative C blocks the outer exit door against the ability to be opened from the inside.

7b) Shooter then fires a shot into the air, and opens fire on the persons close enough to him that they might be able to interfere if finding the courage or opportunity. Rendering them a zero threat, he turns his attention to the crowd, who has by now had time to make their way into the aisles, providing two target rich kill zones. Since the farthest Aisle is largely protected by the balcony stair/wall, he shoots there, first. Some rounds penetrate the walls into theater 8. He then turns his attention to the Aisle he stands in, for which he has a clear line of fire all the way to the entrance. Once shooting has begun, second shooter might be able to enter unnoticed, but I do not think it possible not to be seen for the whole time. One of these efforts kills the parent(s) or guardian(s) of Jane Doe, a little girl of unknown identity.

7c) Operatives A and B discharge flash-bang and smoke grenades in the Lobby area to deter Police entry and usefulness from that approach. They then enter theaters 8 and 10 respectively to give warnings against using the EXIT doors to the parking lot as that would create unwanted witnesses.

7d) Update: This story element would seem to be a lie as it is based on Eric Hunters statement, now known to be false. However a caveat is in order. It is possible Hunder was in theater 10 and did see evidence of fired rounds penetrating into 10. It is possible he saw ‘something’ on the carpet and later presumed it was blood, or embellished. But it is impossible that he might have rescued two girls from Theater 9 because the only emergency exit in 10 is on the far right of the screen, with 9 to the left of the screen.

Yet there is this possibility, and it dovetails with other steps in this walk through: since Hunter was coming down the steps of the balcony area by his description, and obviously looking down to watch his step at least some of the time (else how see the blood?), then that means anyone might have used the emergency exit ahead of him. If so, it is indeed possible that when he reached and opened the door to the exit, that he encountered two girls and saw a third person which he might have assumed to be the Shooter from theater 9.

To do this, at the time of his statements, he would have had to erroneously presume that theater 9 was to the right instead of the left. That would not be too hard to do, especially if the bullets he thought entering were actually bullets which had already entered from the left and seen striking the right wall where he saw them. But that’s not the important aspect of the two girls story.

Unless a total fabrication, it is indeed possible there were three people in the hallway, two of them girls, one of them wounded. But if so, why were the two girls and the third person trying to get back in? The ONLY way that makes sense, given we know they did not come from theater 9, is if they had been in 10, fled the emergency exit, and once they got to the outer door, were turned back by a second gunman.

THAT could account for any injury, as well (but also, gunfire through the wall from 9 entering 10), and we might presume that, if turned back by a gunman, both the girls and Hunter presumed it to be the Shooter, when in point of fact, it would have to be a second (or third, etc.) participant.

Regardless of if Hunter lied or was foolish, the only possible reason that the Shooter might shoot the adjoining wall remains valid, as explained in the pre update text which follows (end of update, this section, more update2, further below), and that reason dovetails with the above paragraph in confirmation. Therefore, the original material remains seemingly valid, except for how the girls got into the exit hallway — AND did not come from theater 9, at all:

To better insure that theater 10 occupants do not use the EXIT, the Shooter fires at the wall between 9 and 10, immediately to his left, at which point his gun might have jammed. In any event, he is no longer facing centrally to the audience area. While he is attempting to remedy the jam, or facing away and shooting the wall, two teen girls make a break, perhaps having used the darkened area beneath the screen for additional cover, and go behind Shooter to the EXIT. Shooter, frustrated with the inability to fix the gun, sees the girls, or, if the gun had not jammed, he saw them and decided the rifle not the best weapon. He pulls a Glock and empties it in their direction and discards it, but does not yet give chase. He knows the girls will be trapped by Operative C who blocks the outer exit door. A second shooter complicates this explanation, which is a second reason I do not favor it.

Note: One possible remedy to the jam might have been to insert a standard ammo magazine, which would explain why the second gun had magazine and the drum was left inside. Alternately, we might wish to think he never had anything in the gun BUT a standard clip or two, and the half-empty drum was a prop left behind for Congressional anti-gun lobby delight.

7e) The girls are now in the adjoining hallway, but when they try to open the outer door, they find it blocked. Eric Hunter did ignore instructions from Operative B and opens the EXIT where he finds the girls, which he ends up helping back into 10. At this same time, Shooter is ejecting his ammo drum half used, either because it actually jammed, or because it was intended to be left behind to insure the use thereof made it into the press to stir angst against the right to bear arms. He then follows after the girls to kill them.

7f) update: as discussed immediately above, Hunter’s false statement completely invalidates this step, and yet, reanalysis based on discovery of the false statement, shows (also above) an alternate explanation which supplants this one. We might amend to say, it appears that yet another operative was at the exit door to prevent anyone from exiting and seeing anything there to illustrate a conspiracy.

We might even dare presume the two girls have simply elected not to come forward in the realization that, given the official story is a lone shooter lie, that to do so would put them in the same boat as the many witnesses who reported seeing a shooter on the grassy knoll, and soon thereafter met with strange accidents. If I had seen something, I’d conclude such a risk.

Shooter did chase the girls, but could not get past the EXIT door in 10 being held shut by Hunter. While he is attempting it, Jane Doe enters the hallway and is not noticed because Shooter’s vision is limited in a gas mask. It is not safe for shooter to take off his gas mask until there are no possible witnesses, if he is not Holmes — and there was likely some gas in the hallway. Shooter abandons his efforts and makes for the outer exit door and the parking lot. This may be because he is told Police are now approaching the scene via his communications earpiece, warned by Operatives outside based on their assessment of Police sirens. While this is going on, the little girl shot in the theater, and trapped by the body of an adult, is being given CPR by an young teenager, but she will die, and is clearly not Jane Doe.

8a) Operative C also knows that as Police near the scene, it is time for him to act. He releases the outer EXIT door for use by Shooter and enters the van to prepare for getaway. The side doors are open, engine running. Any others present are also ready to go, and James is seated in his car staring blankly, and largely oblivious.

8b) When Shooter opens the door to the outside, the little girl follows (also complicated if there is a second shooter, a third reason for disfavor), and is seen by Operative C as he looks sharply over his right shoulder through the side doors at the EXIT door, looking for Shooter. Shooter is told about Jane and he drops his gun to grab her, and in the struggle her shoes fall off. Perhaps because Shooter had to stoop, and being encumbered with weapons, he may have fallen to the ground, giving Jane a chance at freedom and a head start. He has thus far not even had a chance to remove his gas mask. Because James’ car obscures the details below hood height, and it is night, and all clothing and weapons are black, no one in the Van sees the Shooter drop the gun, and so, they do not retrieve it.

8c) Shooter regains his feet and gives chase as Police actually start to arrive on scene. He may have elected to leave his gas mask on to insure that if anyone saw him, they would not see his face (no orange hair). By the time he catches up to her at the corner of the building, Police see him at distance and call the sighting in to Dispatch; “suspect in gas mask.” The girl may have been concealed visually by cars parked in their line of sight.

8d) Shooter either looses his mask in the struggle or removes it as he makes his way back toward the exit with the girl. It is dropped very near the corner, leaving his hand free to procure his knife. It is soon over except for the bleeding. He lets her body slump forward to prevent blood from covering his clothing as a tell-tale marker, and carries her back to the doorway in a run and drops her.

8e) He likely saw Police and knows time is short. He leaves the gun on the ground or presumes it already picked up, and directly makes for and enters the van which pulls away. If a Police van with one or more uniformed occupants, escape would be assured. If not Police, a calm, cool driving speed and bravado would see them through. Police quickly zero in on James.

9) James is apprehended, and the story plays out in media. The second gun (in the car) is, in my opinion, likely there to imply James was prepared for an extensive standoff. But the second gas mask was not intended to be left behind. Operative(s) A and/or B use the confusion of the greater event to enter the security camera video room and replace or sabotage the tapes. They will flash Police ID if challenged. The first Policeman to arrive at James’ car who is able calls dispatch to report finding Jane Doe, and requesting an ambulance. But one cannot come, because they also find an IED in James’ car, and are waived off. A request to use a Police car is made, and that is likely why there were no chalk marks. But the mystery remains.

Note: since writing this post, the strange drowning death of expert swimmer and athlete nurse, Jennifer Gallagher, has been reported. One is moved to wonder if perhaps the little girl brought to a Hospital had been left in her care, and if perhaps someone was worried the little girl had managed to tell her something. Dead or alive, talking or not — no matter to the killer, because it would not do for a victim to exist with a knife wound and no murder weapon to be found at the crime scene. This would require that her body (dead or alive) and records of her presence would need be taken from the Hospital. If, for whatever reason, it was felt the nurse was the only one who knew about the child (which would be most unusual to normal hospital routines), she, too, would need to die. While this notion should not be a very likely scenario under normal hospital procedures, in a mass shooting with lots of victims, procedures may have been let drop, making it easier to ‘fix’ the situation. In any event, we need to know what happened to Jane Doe, and if it had anything to do with Jennifer’s tragic end. And, in keeping with the JFK analysis earlier offered… dozens of eye witnesses in Dallas suffered mysterious deaths in the weeks to months following the assassination.

10) Jame’s psychiatrist, not receiving a package intended for earlier delivery, calls Police over a package which is received ‘because it has no return address.’ I know you call the cops when that happens all the time.

And now you likely know more than ever before, more than Police are willing to admit, more than those behind this event would wish you to know.

All I want to know is the truth, and the current official version does not fit the bill. Yet I’m unhappy with my explanation, too, because if IT is true, it means the enemy who deems citizens expendable pawns for political power grabs is somewhere in the Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Media Complex. And the problem with that is… they are everywhere.

PLEASE: Comment (page bottom, or contact me), Rate (at page top), Share/Tweet this article. Visit my Reader Forum to promote your own cause or URL.

Related articles

25 Questions No One Has Asked About Aurora Shooting (pt. 2)


You can always spot a conspiracy at work… was james holmes a patsy by DOD or CIA? whenever you see evidence of a cover up in play

Our review continues from PART I, by H. Michael Sweeney, Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved. No reproduction permissions will be granted for the first 90 days. Links only, please.

In review: This in-depth series of posts will reveal startling new investigative issues for the first time, anywhere. The detail required to make concise arguments on a long list of critical elements forces it to be offered in installments. You may wish to subscribe to be sure you do not miss one along the way. Doing so, you will discover:

  • Three motives for making James Holmes a Patsy with Fascism as benefactor, and two possible motives for targeting Century Theaters
  • Easy link access to the key-most videos and images for each critical point of evidence presented in a logical, easy to follow order.
  • Reasoning there were at least three additional helpers involved in a professional black operation backed up by even more supporting players
  • Introduction of an actual political REASON for targeting The Dark Knight Rises (TDKR), a reason which fits one of the proposed motives
  • 25 key questions missed by almost everyone, the answer to any one of which could easily provide reasonable doubt that it was a lone gunman event
  • A walk-through narrative portraying an alternate scenario which fits all  conflicting facts into a workable reality.

James Holmes was a patsy Part Two

James Holmes was a patsy

 second gas mask and gun in aurora prove holmes a patsy

If you missed part one, click here

QUESTION 8: Who warned people not to use the EXIT in theater 8, and why? Tim McGrath mentions it, and I’ve seen but lost track of one other witness who confirmed the same point. Tim says the people in 8 were panicking and trying to leave. Toward the end of the clip he states someone entered the theater from the Lobby area and warned everyone not to go outside because the shooter was outside. Excuse me? How would they know this? If there was, WHO was it, because according to this witness, shooting was still going on in theater 9? Could this be misinterpretation or misunderstanding? I’d be open to the suggest except that it also happened in theater 10…

QUESTION 9: Who warned people not to use the EXIT in theater 10, and why? At 2:50 AM Channel 9 coverage has a witness from (by deduction) theater 10 who describes events while the shooting was going on in theater 9.  We really need to pin down if it was theater 10, so here is the deductive logic thread: Someone came into the theater from the left entrance, and warned them not to go outside, again while shooting was still taking place. Theater 9 would be to the left of theater 10, and theater 7 would be the left of theater 8. It would not be logical to presume someone further away from events (nearer to theater 7) to either be criminally involved or otherwise inclined or able to perceive a need for a warning. Any such person would need be closer, so it had to be theater 10. So again, who and why… would someone issue a warning without basis for such knowledge?

QUESTION 10: Why were bullets going through the walls into both theater 8 and 10? A look at the theater diagram from the Denver Post reveals that it would be logical for some rounds to pass through into 8, but there are only two ways it could have happened in theater 10. Either there was a second shooter unseen because people were attempting to hide or flee with their backs to the screen, or James deliberately turned his weapon on the wall. It is also possible any second shooter went behind the screen to appear in the dark on the far side, making them hard to see, but only if they used a silencer to completely suppress flash. This would create a distinctive sound witnesses did not report, as far as we know. Only in a cross fire situation should bullets logically enter 10, as shooting the wall is illogical. Why would James waste rounds to shoot the wall, especially since his shooting spree was ended prematurely when his gun jammed? Has anyone counted the bullet holes and compared to the half-empty magazine?

QUESTION 11: Who wore the second gas mask and used the second rifle found behind the theater? We have multiple Police statements which confirm James was found in his car and had with him in his car, a gas mask, and three guns: an AR-15 rifle, a Remington 870 shotgun, and a Glock handgun, with a second handgun and the high-capacity drum canister for the AR-15 discarded inside the theater.

Yet we have photographic evidence, Police radio traffic (18 minutes in), and additional statements to the press which prove a second mask and weapon were found lying on the ground behind the theater. The gun was at the threshold of the EXIT door, and the gas mask was found all the way at the end of the building, some 150 feet away from the EXIT and Jame’s car, where ‘the shooter’ is first reported being seen. The gas mask is part of a whole other series of questions which are the most troubling, of all. So why did James bring but not use two rifles, and two gas masks? And why does that weapon show a standard magazine (the light gray forward appendage). We were led to believe he quit shooting because his drum magazine jammed (which he left inside). Curious, as I would have thought the gun would be sans clip of any kind.

2nd gun with standard clip, girls shoes at outer exit leading to theater 9 & 10
2nd gas mask at far corner of building well away from where James waited

QUESTION 12: Why did the shooter not shoot the first and most logical victim? Jennifer Seeger clearly describes on ABC, a rifle being the first gun used to shoot into the air, and then it was leveled at her, but the shooter paused and did not shoot. She dropped to the ground and he instead opened fire on the crowd behind her. The clues to the answer as to why may lay in the next few questions.

QUESTION 13: Why does one witness says the first gun used was a rifle, and another a shotgun? We know he had both a Remington 870 shotgun and an AR-15 rifle with him. Both witnesses state the gun used was aimed directly at them, and both were within a couple of yard’s distance of the shooter and near to each other, and both took cover quickly. There are several other questions regarding these accounts, but the bottom line is that there is both a visual difference in the appearance of such weapons, and a stark difference between them their sound when fired. It is inconceivable that one can misidentify a shotgun as a rifle some mere feet away, especially once fired. Does the 870 shown at right look like a rifle, to you? Does the rifle look like a shotgun?

Which is which? Is it that hard to tell? What about the sound difference?

We have already examined Jenifer Seegar’s account. Here is the shotgun account by witness, Pierce O’Farrell, in a Channel 9 report, In point of fact, he was immediately shot at and wounded by shotgun, twice — once before being able to gain cover, and the second while he lay low.  All witnesses seem quite believable taken on their own, but I find a shooting victim with medical treatment confirming their story more credible than someone unscathed. Why two distinctly different accounts? Again, other questions may hold the answers…

QUESTION 14: Why did several witnesses stick around for more than a day and well into the night and even the next day after the shooting to be interviewed endlessly by local and national media, to include multiple appearances on a given media outlet? I raise this question because they both tended to use the same individualized phrases and hand gestures over and over, and both emphasize a lone gunman. In some cases, the cameras seem rather far back to insure we see the gestures. In fact, one of them goes overboard in his efforts, consistently waxing emotional to the point of tears. More to the point, the conflicting facts cited above play into the matter, and may be why more than one ‘conspiracy theorist’ has suggested these are paid actors intending to Wag-the-Dog.

Here is the man, Chris Ramos, on CNN. This is him on ABC. The others are Jenifer Seegar and her friend from the ‘rifle’ account just spoken of. She is seen here on ABC, and here on CNN. Her companion who frequently appears with her but who hardly speaks, becomes a kind of ‘silent confirmation’ to cement the reality of her statements. If these habitual appearances are not a Wag-the-Dog plot element, I’d like to know what they really are? Seegar’s not being shot and not knowing which weapon first was used suggests she was not actually present — but if that’s true, then the only way she could have known about the first shot being in the air would be if she was a participant with prior knowledge of the plan. There are yet other clues of Wag-the-Dog forces in play, as seen next.

QUESTION 15: How did CNN’s Wolf Blitzer manage to so quickly have available a slick 3-D computer-rendered, fully touch-screen interactive replay of the crime, and why was it altered between airings? His show, some 12 hours after the shooting, but only a few hours after witness accounts and Police statements useful for the purpose were known, provided the most comprehensive report yet available, and put EVERYTHING from the OFFICIAL  STORY into clear context. Find it here, the third video down in the group of smaller videos toward page bottom. How did they mange to have this super sophisticated technology ready to go so quickly, unless prepared in advance?

I am additionally concerned because subsequent use of the same presentation in a later program is altered. The first presentation shows only James’ entry via the EXIT and the aftermath (e.g., the kicking in the door first impression). The second shows someone going to the EXIT from within the theater to the EXIT door, depicting them LEAVING, which NO WITNESS HAS DESCRIBED, followed shortly by the shooter’s entrance (as if not expecting someone would end up recounting the man opening the door, and thus it does NOT show him returning from the door, but vanishing). Witnesses specifically describe the man from inside as NOT leaving the theater by the EXIT and a significant delay before the shooter arrives.

You see the altered version here at one minute into the CNN video.  This change took place after challenges to the ‘kick the door’ claims were taking hold on the Web, perhaps best exemplified by Alex Jones’ special report to that end earlier in the day. Yet the witness reports about the man opening the door (and NOT leaving) were known to media before even the first airing. Why was it not included in the first place if not Wag-the-Dog? Why was it subsequently altered to an INCORRECT depiction, later? Yet one more possible clue follows…

Was Aurora shooting a DOD or CIA operation?

The next installment asks these important questions:

James Holmes • How did CBS News know to describe ‘buckets of ammunition’ before anyone had seen inside Jame’s apartment?
James Holmes • Why did the shoot try to get into theater 10 after leaving 9 when his gun was jammed?
James Holmes • Why was James so calm when arrested when the official reason is impossible?
James Holmes • Why did James allegedly mail his attack plan to arrive well before the attack?
James Holmes • Why did his Psychiatrist call Police when it was not delivered to insure they found it anyway? 
James Holmes • Why was almost everyone in James’ life connected directly or indirectly with Mind Control technology?
James Holmes • And more…
 
PLEASE: Comment (page bottom, or contact me), Rate (at page top), Share/Tweet this article. Visit my Reader Forum to promote your own cause or URL. 
Related articles

Official Formula For Conspiracy Coverups


CU=(AC+P)x(LA+FB)x(4+D)x(FE-TE)^(GI)

by H. Michael Sweeney, from the Professional Paranoid Newsletter
copyright©2002, all rights reserved — permissions by request only

For some time I’ve been playing with the idea of a book along the line of ‘Anatomy of The American Conspiracy’ or some such. The idea is to show that every one of our government’s best cover ups fit a very predictable pattern of events. I guess the idea is that if all these historical nightmares were simply random and natural evolutions of the nature claimed for them by media and government, there should be no ‘symmetry’ and no identical makeup. One event should not consistently look like another.

But what if there was actually a tried and true ‘formula’ in use by someone somewhere in an a CIA office with a door marked ‘CONSPIRACY COVERUP PLANNING’ (CONCUP)? What impact might that formula, if applied time and time again, have on the actual crimes involved? Would there be some kind of detectable ‘signature’ or pattern that clever observers could spot? You bet!

In such a book, I would take a few of our most famous conspiracies and conduct an autopsy looking for forensic clues that could be said to be similar in each event. From that, working backwards, perhaps, could be deduced the ‘formula’ itself. All of this, of course, being hypothetical, since we all

know that there is no such thing as a conspiracy — as media assures us, describing all who do not accept the official line as ‘conspiracy buffs’ and ‘conspiracy theorists.’ Never do they talk about the hard facts and logical questions raised by those ‘buffs,’ all of which are based on conflicting facts and holes in the stories being fed us. It’s tempting to become a ‘theorist.’

And no wonder, since no Federal Judge has ever found for a conspiracy. Why, even when the Christic Institute sued CIA and others over a long list of crimes uncovered by their exhaustive investigation… crimes which involved money laundering through select banks taken over by CIA for the purpose… the judge decided to throw the case out as frivolous, because there was ‘no evidence of a conspiracy’ beyond a few dozen cartons full of documentation and sworn affidavits. The Judge then slapped a $12M fine on the Institute, which was if someone knew how much money they had access to (as it was just out of reach.) This, of course, bankrupted the Institute and allowed CIA to seize all their assets in countersuit, including the hard earned evidence. Years later, of course, we found out that the judge happened to own a lot of stock in at least one of those banks… but of course, that was not a conspiracy, either. Obviously, it was just a ‘frivolous’ theory.

Well, as it happens, you CAN take almost any handful of conspiracies and dissect them as discussed, and guess what? There does just happen to be a long list of similarities. It also happens that the bulk of these similarities fit perfectly with the 25 Rules of Disinformation. Not exactly theory, the rules are used in college courses on Journalism, Psychology, and Political Science. Some progress is possible.

Taking JFK, Flight 800, and the Oklahoma City Bombing, for instance (others qualify, but these are useful to the newsletter), it can be shown that there are a number of ‘coincidental’ matters. From these clues, I have been so bold as to ‘theorize’ what the CONCUP formula might look like:

CU=(AC+P)x(LA+FB)x(4+D)x(FE-TE)^(GI)

This translates as: a successful CoverUp equals (Abundant Clues plus a Patsy) times (Linked Alternatives plus a Fall-Back Position) times the (FOURth estate plus Disinformationalists) times (False Evidence sold as truth minus True Evidence ignored, vanished, or altered) raised to the power of a government controlled investigation.

Some of these ‘variables’ need further definition. The Fourth Estate is a term used to describe Media, especially a controlled media, such as when CIA infiltrated U.S. media with 12,000 operatives to slant news in Operation Mockingbird. Linked alternatives refers to evidentiary trails which tend to lead ‘conspiracy theorists’ down a myriad set of paths which keep crossing each other or running directly one into another (a tangled Web resulting in ‘too many clues’ fabricated for the purpose).

In examining the basis for this deduction, one might be moved, if writing such a book, to cite specific examples. By way of illustration, I’ll offer a few such examples here — but point out each each example could fill a chapter if properly reviewed. Let’s face it. JFK, OKC, and Flight 800 are huge and complex conspiracies, according to ‘theorists.’

All three crimes (yes, Flight 800 was a crime) exhibit more abundant clues than we can shake a stick at. I insist that if given space to make the case, all three have a patsy – which in the case of Flight 800 is the Center Wing Tank. So much for (AC+P). (Disinformation Rule 12: Enigmas Have No Solutions; Rule 15: Fit the facts to alternate conclusions.)

All three have linked alternative paths for investigators to endlessly wander with no seeming apparent successful determinations (at least as far as are allowed to reach the public’s ears via media.) All three have a fall-back position established, a matter which again might take some explanation space. With JFK, it was either the ‘Communists’ (Solidarists, Cubans, or Kremlin, take your pick), a matter which was used to scare the Warren Commission into a desired finding for ‘lone assassin’ to avoid having to answer with a military strike against Russia. In Oklahoma and Flight 800, it would be International Terrorism. So much for (LA+FB.) Disinfo Rule 14: Demand Complete Solutions – Rule 11: Establish Fall Back Positions.

All three have enjoyed the helping hand of both the Fourth Estate and other non-news world Disinformationalists, a matter which hardly needs mentioning or proofs to anyone who has followed the ‘conspiracy theories’ as they developed. (FE+D.) Disinfo Rule 23: Create bigger distractions; Rule 24: Silence critics;  Rule 15: Fit the facts to alternate conclusions; Rule 3: Create rumor mongers;  Rule 4: Use a straw man.

There are definitely false and conflicting facts galore in all three cases. JFK’s magic bullet and the impossible shooting time/accuracy required. Flight 800’s exploding tank (where is the soot and the bulging, twisted metalwork?) and altered trajectory studies. OKC’s impossible home-made ANFO bomb and impossible mass destruction by that bomb. And all three have ignored true facts. JFK’s grassy knoll, missing brain, and CIA’s sworn courtroom confession by CIA agent Marita Lorenz. Flight 800’s vanished witnesses and missing FDR and CVR data and the silenced forensic investigation. OKC’s multiple bombs found on the third floor and seismic and audio recording evidence of two explosions. So we have our (FF-TF.) Disinfo Rule 20: False evidence; 22: Manufacture a new truth; Rule 13: Alice in Wonderland Logic; Rule 16: Vanish evidence and witnesses.

And government investigations, of course, are exactly the problem when government is the principle suspect being protected. No one in government seems to consider anything in the way of actual facts, ignores all challenges and questions about the claimed facts. JFK used the Warren Commission to white wash everything for us. We had FBI, mostly, and a rigged Grand Jury in OKC, and that’s according to a Juror. In Flight 800, we had US Navy, CIA and FBI, but mostly NTSB to dazzle us with doubtful logic proclaimed as truth. That is our (GI.) Disinfo Rule 8: Invoke authority; Rule 21: Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body; Rule 1: Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.

Of course, this is not such a book, so I don’t have the time or space to make a compelling case for these arguments. Nor do I have the space to describe the more elegant formula used as catalyst and bonding agents. There is a kind of nested trilogy of trilogies, you see, all having to do with disinformation.

One set is concerted disinfo attack aimed directly at the ‘conspiracy theorists’ through covert infiltration of the actual ‘conspiracy theorist’ group, usually to create a strawman or simply sabotage their progress; then there is disinfo through mainstream media designed to derail conspiracy gains that might catch the public’s imagination; and wild theories (more strawmen) promoted by bogus ‘theorists’ specifically to discredit all such ‘theorists.’ It would take a book to document the examples in JFK, OKC, and 800.

The Second Trilogy lies in evidence used by government, virtually all of which is flawed or tainted in some way by government’s handling — a matter completely intolerable in any normal criminal matter. Example: in Flight 800 FBI’s explosives residue tests were conducted after pressure washing the items; obvious evidence is ignored. Example: in JFK, Marita Lorenz’ testimony to the Church Committee on Assassinations, the FBI, and in court were completely ignored by everyone, including media; legal processes are subverted. Example: in OKC, two unexploded bombs found on the third floor were not presented to Grand Jury or at McVeigh’s trial — which would prove a broader conspiracy and implicate McVeigh as an obvious patsy — one who could not be allowed to die until the greater conspiracy was solved. This is why his death was so important — to cement government’s claims forever in media’s view, which was just why, in reverse, Oswald had to die at any cost, even if requiring the sacrifice of conspirator Ruby.

The third trilogy creates a coordinated disinfo machine consisting of a manipulated ‘Mockingbird’ media literally owned by the military-industrial complex (making it, in my own coined term, the Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Media complex, or MIIM); other-than news media ‘apologists’ (authors and prominent persons) who make cases for government’s arguments and criticize ‘theorists’; and a round of TV and film docudramas and ‘investigative reports’ designed to ‘portray the facts’ which just happen to match those provided by government press conferences and media, ignoring all else. Where this leaves us, of course, is at the doorstep of understanding. Gaining such an understanding may enable us to reexamine the events of our time more carefully.

It is your mind. Use it. Use it or lose it to their lies, a form of mind control.

What Does It Take to Start A Revolution?


What Does It Take to Start A Revolution?

(Are we in danger of having one?)

This (attributed to ) originally appeared duri...

From The Pennsylvania gazette, 9 May 1754. Abbreviations used: South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, and New England. This is a somewhat odd division: New England was four colonies, and Delaware and Georgia are missing (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

by H. Michael Sweeney

This and future blog posts on the them of revolution (martial law, etc.) are herein intended to serve as building-block guideposts to both citizens and anyone in government who will listen to reason. Citizens so they become more aware of their rights, obligations, and options under the law as citizens. Government so that they might realize their errant ways are leading us all toward that day when the Camel’s back is broken by a straw event of their own making, and revolution breaks out as the people’s only remaining recourse. I do not believe they realize how dangerous their criminal actions have been in this respect. While I do not call for revolution, and merely warn it nears, were it to happen tomorrow I would be forced to join in it.

I fear such a day looms near, and that it may even now already be to late to prevent it. If true, it is your fault, reader, for allowing things to progress that far. Worse than revolution by the oppressed and disenfranchised, there is also the possibility that an armed revolution will be required to restore the government from a military takeover, which is addressed in part two and three of this triune post. Don’t you dare think for a moment it is not a possibility (read on).

In fact, I so fear the possibility might be true that I’m lifting the copyright on my book set Fatal Rebirth, which contains considerable detail on these topics and specifically offers advice about what to do if it actually does come to pass. The goal is to reduce violence, save lives, and yet assure any battle for restoration of a Constitutional government is successful.  Details at the end of each blog post.

This first post consists of several parts:

  • The Right and Duty of Revolution;
  • A Closer Look at Revolutionary Processes;
  • About Redress of Grievances;
  • The Start and Aftermath Revolution (a review of several actual revolutions);

The Right and Duty of Revolution

English: Painting, 1856, by Junius Brutus Stea...

English: Painting, 1856, by Junius Brutus Stearns, Washington at Constitutional Convention of 1787, signing of U.S. Constitution. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

First of all, regardless of the nation-state involved, when no other recourse remains, it is one’s right and duty to self, family, and to fellow citizens and the nation to revolt against tyranny in its various forms. It is one’s right by virtue of self defense, always. But here in America, it is also our right by law, according to the Constitution. In a true working democracy, the right to armed revolution does not (should not, according to scholars) exist as such, replaced instead by the opportunity to vote in a new government, a kind of redress which is its own kind of revolution when sweeping house occurs (like that ever actually happens). However, if that democracy is thwarted by systemic manipulation such that said opportunity is wired against the people, the right and duty yet again surfaces for armed revolt.

Only so long as the democracy does not violate its charter for power (in America, the Constitution and Bill of Rights), writes just laws in accordance with the charter (laws are Constitutional), and obeys the laws itself, is it safe from armed revolt. Unfortunately, the United States has embarked on a steady course of rapid-fire issuance of unjust, oppressive, and unconstitutional laws in opposition to the charter, and has itself regularly disobeyed and abused its own laws and, and for the matter, International treaties on related matters (another discussion for another day, perhaps).

In any nation, this is rightly called tyranny, and nullifies all law in the end, though we must yet speak of redress as part of the equation. Sans such redress, the nation ceases to exist as defined by its charter, which is a legal contract between the people and the government which was hence broken by government’s wrongful acts. The just penalty is forfeiture of power, and when failing to yield and relying upon force of arms, will surely require armed rebellion to right the wrongs. It is that simple (unfortunately).

A given revolt may be of any flavor or level of intensity; civil disobedience or peaceful protest which causes the government to fail or resign, simply voting out the worst rascals and replacing them with hopefully better rascals; or when no other course works, and when matters are simply no longer tolerable, actual armed revolution. Revolution, for governments, is the bullet in the gun they continually wave about called power, the gun used in a de facto game of Russian Roulette they play every time they misuse their power. Eventually, if the game continues long enough, they shoot themselves in the head and earn their just reward. Our government has been pulling that trigger time and time again since before the September 11 attacks, and more so, since. Again, that is your fault, not theirs. You allowed it by your silence. They may be criminal, but you were negligent.

The firing of a bullet when they squeeze the trigger depends on lines in the sand drawn by those among the citizenry who are the angriest. Sometimes a citizen does not realize such a line exists (they do not premeditate it) until it is crossed, and sometimes a citizen will fear the event in advance and draw the line in bitter anticipation. When government crosses that line, whatever it may be, that citizen begins to work in earnest toward revolt. When sufficient numbers… remarkably few in count as we shall see, are so moved, a revolt can be easily triggered. Unbelievably easy, in fact. Defining appropriate lines in the sand is covered in a companion post.

Depending on what line one might choose, armed revolution in America may actually be overdue, in which case this warning is all but too late. Again understand: I do not hereby call for revolution, but shout warnings that it may soon be forced upon us by government actions and inactions. They have been playing roulette for some time, now, and many lines in the sand have already been crossed as judged by countless people I’ve talked with at public gatherings. Any day the final pull of the trigger could transpire, and yet those in government seem Hell bent to spin the chamber yet again and again, the most recent on March 1 when every Senator and Congressman except Ron Paul voted to pass the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act, which essentially ends the right to protest or freely assemble at any location near anything having to do with government, including elections, as government deems useful to retain total control; another stab through the heart of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

A Closer Look at Revolutionary Processes

Most revolutions would seem to stem from economic and social inequities brought on by an uncaring or overbearing government which favors a power elite over the needs and rights of its people. In more recent history, such practice was given a name, and that name is Fascism. Surely, even Sheeple can be made to see that paradigm is at work in the United States, today, as perhaps best made clear by the variety and nature of complaints fielded by the Occupy movement, which very nearly was the catalyst for a revolution according to some viewpoints. Certainly many wished it had sparked one or feared it might. The ‘R’ word was definitely being tossed about in commentaries far and wide.

What most people do not realize is that revolution is actually a very simple thing to engineer (though spontaneous combustion is more often the mechanism involved) — when the situation is ripe for it. When tyranny, oppression, or general grievances with government are strong enough, almost anything can spark a revolution, and it does not actually take a lot of people to get a roaring fire started. In the snapshots below, we see that an incredibly small number of people can, by the right actions and in right circumstances, sponsor, though not necessarily their intent, full-scale revolutionary responses in the general population. They need not even be carrying guns to do so, which is why the 99% were considered worthy of the ‘R’ word.

The notion of governmental suicide via Russian Roulette should be restated and underscored, for governments truly dig their own graves at their own risk. In like analogy, governments in power tend to make their own noose with respect to the outcome of a revolution, building their own platform, and then to jumping off the platform on cue to insure the success of the revolution. The platform could invariably be described as their construct of oppressive laws and abuse of power, the noose as their own unwillingness to operate within their own laws and policy, all generally to the profit of a power elite at the expense of the common citizen. They then, like a mindless Lemming, jump off the platform by coming down hard and heavy on any early revolutionary event (generally, a peaceful event where government response is violent), creating martyrs for the cause. We see this in almost every case, as the central-most thing which galvanizes support of the masses for the revolutionary cause. Spontaneous combustion results, and government’s neck gets snapped with a sudden jolt.

That is one reason the Occupy Movement failed to spark a full-scale revolution; the level of violence by government was rather minimal (say, in comparison to the kind of over-the-top response seen in the smaller-scale WTO protests such as in Seattle and in Europe). That the Federal government did not take action and no State Governor took actions involving National Guard or Martial Law were restraints which also helped keep things from boiling over.

One can also make the argument that a controlled media and other trickeries served to help keep public opinion from galvanizing sympathetic support under the unfortunate levels of violence which were present. However, their ‘polite’ and sneakier responses (including media manipulation and the FRGBI Act) was their own underhanded way of eliminating any future Occupy movement as well as WTO protests, etc., and that is why it was a bit more than just another pull of the trigger. I, for one, am hopping mad, and wondering how much the price of guns are going to go up with the increase in demand.

About Redress of Grievances

Modern Bill of Rights

Modern Bill of Rights (Photo credit: mrplough)

Yet another reason the Occupy movement did not ignite open revolt is that actual revolution was never its intent, though it is likely true that sub groups within the movement might have thought or hoped otherwise. Rather, the movement in general simply sought public exposure of a collective of grievances in hopes of sponsoring useful redress by government. In point of fact, redress of grievances is what activism, protest, and even revolution is all about. We should be well informed on this topic to understand what it means to be under a government, and especially so as an American, as redress is a key part of our very foundation as a democratic nation (in Republic form).

Redress of grievances, when ignored by government, is the sponsor of ALL revolutions. The United States Constitution and Bill of Rights specifically address redress as a major element of that covenant between the People and Government. Where any government fails to insure its obligations to satisfactorily resolve issues of redress remain fully functional and available to citizens, they make themselves liable to revolution as the only remaining alternative for the people. In the U.S., redress is, unfortunately, absolutely flat-out null and void; the Bill of Rights and Constitution have been all but formally discarded, and the systems in place for such redress have been neutered and rendered ineffective.

For example, the notion of challenging unconstitutional laws through the Courts is rendered impractical when it costs millions of dollars and takes toward a decade to see it through to finish… and Congress writes such laws ten times faster than they can be dealt with. Two such Bills in roughly four weeks time! That is not redress, it is premeditated manipulation of a weakness in the system. Whirr… Click!  Whirrrrr,,,

When political heros are assassinated and groups of people are murdered en mass again and again by government acts and a cover up ensues, there is no redress. Whirr… Click!

When lip-service white-washing Warren Commission/9-11 Commission and bogus Congressional Investigations serve as cover up tools (e.g., sealing records, refusing/discounting testimoney/evidence, magic bullet explanations), there is no redress. Whirr… Click!

When whistleblowers are targeted instead of heeded, there is no redress. Whirr… Click!

When government rewards criminal bankers and others who rape the common man and sends the bill to the victims, and they steal more money from Social Security to help offset the sticker price, there is no redress. Whirr… Click!

When wars for oil and other profits are based on lies but no one even apologizes, there is no redress. One could go on, as nowhere do I see useful redress in evidence. All I hear is Whirr… Click!  What do you hear? Certainly seems you do not hear your own voice shouting out a loud “Enough!” At least not yet. Whirrrr…

The Start and Aftermath of Revolution

So, how easy is it to spark a revolution? The answer will help measure how close we may be to having one. Lets take one good case example which is quite parallel in many ways to the situation in the United States, today, and then run some numbers for it and several other famous (major) revolutions for comparison. A revolution is actually easy to come by, if the right ducks are in a row, heaven please forbid such a need.

The French Revolution 1848…

"The Storming of the Bastille", Visi...

“The Storming of the Bastille” (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

France had a population of about 38 million at the time and was suffering a Monarchy quite uncaring of its people in favor of the wealthy. It was a kind of Fascism where nobility tended to be the most wealthy and most prominent of ‘corporate’ powers. High unemployment and underemployment rates of deep double digits forced the Middle and lower classes into poverty, in part fueled by a shift in focus by Industry to part time employment for those few able to keep their jobs. Sound familiar?

General economic crisis caused a surge in bankruptcies and small business failures at the hands of the larger corporations of the day. An unusually severe Winter brought on by a Greenlandic volcanic ash cloud which severely damaged crops that year was fueled by a shortage of coal and food brought on by the economic crisis.  Almost the entire populace was in dire straights, unless wealthy or of noble birth. France wold fall almost overnight before the year’s end. Let them eat cake? What cake?

The government continued to be both unable and unwilling to address problems and instead fueled them with solutions which either failed to be useful or which were actually profit opportunities for the wealthy. The military was time and again pressed into service to police and stem protests (they jumped off their platform). Instead of quelling and calming the public, these responses fueled them and fostered a unison of anger.

In June of 1848 the French Revolution was essentially started by 577 citizens (commoners referred to as the Third Estate, which is, by the way, a designation system used by Royals: the Royals are the First Estate, whereby Barons and Lords are the Second Estate, citizens the Third Estate, and from which media has since often been called the Fourth Estate), who in outrage over being denied their legal appearance at court for redress, met in conference (known as The Tennis Court Oath) to protest. This was their 99% moment, and they agreed (577 out of 578) in an Oath which established themselves as a governmental authority (The National Assembly) seeking Constitutional reforms which eventually would lead to the drafting of the Declaration of the Rights of Man, a document quite similar in character to the Bill of Rights.

This revolutionary act (the Oath), and the to-be-expected heavy-handed response by military so useful for the purpose, indeed galvanized splintered groups into a unified resistance which quickly evolved into people taking to the streets in Paris and elsewhere, eventually to storm the Bastille and force the Crown to retire in favor of forming The French Republic. It took less than two weeks for the government to fall. It was the best of times, it was the worst of times (Dickens; A Tale of Two Cities.)

The 577 who took a stand represented a mere .000015% of the nation’s populace, or about one in 7,000 persons. But the mood of the people was sympathetic to their aims, and when government reacted in murderous opposition instead of simply ignoring them, an unstated rally call was heard and heeded by the people. In France, the civil and military powers had guns and cannons, and the people only had pitchforks, swords, rocks, and scant few firearms. But they had anger and numbers which quickly forced capitulation, though at a cost of life on both sides – about 300,000 souls, or just under 1% of the population. Not all revolutions are even that costly.

Other Revolutions

The American Revolution began with a similar meeting of just 56 Men from the 13 Colonies, the population of the Colonies at the time about 2 million. That was the 1st, and later, the 2nd Continental Congress, and we know where that led in short order. That means about .000028% or one in 3,500 persons was all it took. King George, of course, jumped off the platform big time, leading to Lexington, and the resulting loss of life for both sides combined was about 34,000, or 1.5%.

The U.S.S.R. Revolution of 1991 began with 36 delegates of the Baltic Republic of Estonia and Latvia who, along with several hundred ‘Intellectuals’ signed a demand of autonomy from the Soviet Union (that would be like a Texas and California demanding Secession from the Union). This forced the Russian Communist Party (their government) to consider their redress and to attempt a compromise to hold Russia together, as other States were also wanting to flee the Union, but in the end, it would not be — the ship was clearly sinking. The population of the U.S.S.R. at the time was about 290 million. That works out to .0000015 or about 1 in 70,000.

A lot of things happened stepwise, but the important aspect is that violence was quite mitigated because government did not exactly jump off the platform. Instead, the military almost immediately sided with the revolutionaries, and such violence was not needed as a catalyst because the grievances were many and hatred of the System already abounded universally, even among the military, which at best, had split loyalties. Deaths were virtually unreported they were so few, though civil unrest in power struggles within, between, or with the various Soviet States which elected autonomy in the years following would result in significant loss of life at levels on par with other revolutions. Yet these deaths were not truly the price of freedom for Russia herself. Thus one of the greatest tyrannical governments of all time, a government itself established by a bloody revolution not 100 years earlier, was deposed with hardly a shot fired. Bravo!

The Indian Revolution for freedom from British Rule led by Ghandi in 1919 could arguably be described as a revolution fostered by one man from a population of about 250 million, though in his triumphant ‘March to the Sea to make salt, an illegal act by British decree in attempt to force Indians to pay a salt tax, he set out with 78 followers. By the time he reached the Sea, there were untold thousands. Even so, that defiance was the start of the revolution in real terms, involving only one in about 316,000 persons. The loss of life in the shooting part, which was one-sided as the entire revolution was one of non-violent protest, was about 1,000. These were from British atrocities such as British troops trapping 10,000 unarmed men, women, and children in a public courtyard in Amritsar and opening fire (scene from movie, Ghandi) without warning, expending 1,650 rounds of rifle fire before withdrawing without providing medical aid.

Ironically, the commanding Officer in that event did more to set India free than perhaps Ghandi with respect to World opinion and political fallout. That is the power and importance of government’s role in their own revolutionary downfall.

Inversely, however, it is no guarantee of success to be sure. Revolutions are a dicey thing.

Single man armed with bag of groceries defies a column of more than 50 Chinese tanks and stops them cold while the World held its breath in fear for him. From thehoopla.com.

By example, Red China did not fall as a result of the Tiananmen Square revolution in 1989, in part, because the Red Chinese attempted a total media blackout while they killed 7,000 unarmed students gathered in peaceful protest. With a population of 1.1 billion, that is still only .000006%.

But here is the important part, a singular event which took place after the carnage. One man defied the full might of the Army in an unimaginable act of defiant bravery, and got away with it, If, on the other hand, they had rolled their tank column over the lone civilian deliberately blocking their path… which had been managed to be captured by media… I suspect China would now be a true Republic free of Communist rule. If so, one man would have taken the credit in my book. This showed the World the power of the individual voice. That, my friend, would be your voice… SHOULD be YOUR VOICE…  with as much of his demonstrated power as you care to assume in using it.

Thus we see that most revolutions require relatively little bloodshed, typically less than 1-2% in population loss, and relatively little original effort by a mere handful of citizens… provided the government truly lives up to tyrannical expectations and resists with all the forces at its disposal. As you continue (please) on to read the other posts associated with this post, keep this in mind, and judge for yourself how close to revolution we may or may not be. Decide which side you would choose to support if shooting does start, and make plans for your family’s safely transitioning through any such upheaval. I can only provide a warning and advice on what to consider and what to do… but only you can make the critical decisions that matter.

And they do matter… to you and your family… and to the nation in which you must seek to pursue happiness and whatever destiny awaits us all, every one.

Related articles

Nibiru Updated: A Logical Path to a Credible Planet X


Between government conspiracy to disinform and lunatic fringe misinformation, how do you know what you NEED to know about Nibiru?

 
by H. Michael Sweeney,
copyright © 2011, ProparanoidPress, all rights reserved
permissions to reproduce available on request to pppbooks at comcast (net)

Planet X

Disinformation via Lunatic Fringe vs. Science Fact

Planet X

Dateline Portland, OR August 4, 2011 Updated Aug. 29, 2012 (updates in red)

Planet X

In an age where FEAR is a Political Control Technology applied with eager abandon by our own government through the 4th Estate (media), do we really need to have yet another Doomsday theory and all the disinformation, misinformation, and twisted derivatives that usually accompany?

Yes, if it’s true. Otherwise, Heaven forbid, thank you. I’ve had enough just dealing with JFK, much less all that has followed.

But as an investigator I like to think I’ve made significant inroads in major conspiracy fact finding. I pride myself for revealing what others have missed, and for exposing disinformation and misinformation along the way, generally bringing one (hopefully) closer to the truth. And that makes this the perfect time to state what media seems unwilling to admit: a cover up and the use of disinformation is only necessary when there IS a conspiracy. It is, in fact, proof of a conspiracy. So when the officially insane among us who dare to look at, talk about, or investigate a given conspiracy are labeled with the ‘medical term’ for our insanity as ‘conspiracy theorists,’ I have to say I prefer that insanity  to instead ignoring the lies and inconsistencies in official accounts and accepting them as truth.

End of soap box speech. But I wanted you to understand, if one seeks to discover lies, the easiest place to start looking with success is government and media statements. When you become a conspiracy theorist and are labeled as mentally ill for your trouble, you’ve likely found exactly what you were looking for; truth. Liars label truthers as a means of discrediting them without having to deal with their contentions. They have to, because they fear the truth when it becomes too visible. And when the labeling tactics come right out of the Iron Curtain political control manual (labeling those who question government as mentally ill), you know the kettle is as black as it can be.

You are only allowed to think what they want you to think, or else your mind is sick. How sick is that?

planet x

Planet X, the Conspiracy

Google it if you wish, but if you read everything you can on it you will find as many kooky, half-baked, and downright impossible theories as you will scientifically sound. And yet your determination as to which is which may be less sound, because when it comes to conspiracies, the truth is often closer to the weird than the probable. There are reasons for that, but this is not the time and place to detail. The purpose of this article is to help one weed through the hype and find the most logical path to a credible theory about Planet X. I do think I’ve found that path, with reasonable proof of a conspiracy via cover up, to boot. It (gulp) does portend of Doomsday, to the point that perhaps I won’t put off seeing the movie, 2012, until 2013 after all ~ procrastinator that I am.

The basic elements of all Planet X theory is based in fact, though many of the disinformation sites out there will give you wrong facts, made up facts, or no facts at all, in order to discredit the remaining theories otherwise worthy of your consideration. These are common cover up ploys as seen in my 25 Rules of Disinformation. The basic true facts are these:  There is a large astronomical body of some sort out there which is captive to our sun. It has been temporarily named Planet X. No one can precisely tell us what it is, where it is, where it is going, or if it is a threat… or they are unwilling to do so, despite having spent a hundred million dollars or more on custom space craft and programs for the purpose.

planet x

What they can tell us (but prefer not, it seems) is that:

  • it is big… bigger than the Earth in mass by more than three hundred times.
  • It is dark and does not reflect useful light, which is a bit of a problem, of course, if trying to find and define it.
  • It is so big it tends to collect other bodies and objects as it travels, and is a bit like its own small solar system as result.
  • It is, in fact, possibly a Protostar, a body of dense matter not yet dense enough to ‘ignite’ and become a sun. That could change.
  • It is traveling through our solar system in an extremely elliptical orbit about 30 degrees off axis compared to the orbits of the planets.
  • It takes about 3,650 years to make its own orbit. There are historical evidences of its passing.
  • It is so big that it causes wobbles and other anomalies in planets it comes near (specifically, Pluto, and Uranus, and perhaps EARTH).
  • Such proximity can be harmful to the well being and structural integrity of a planet, and in turn, any life on said planet.
  • It is on its way toward us as you read, scheduled to visit a sky near you next year, give or take.
  • Exactly when, how close, and to what end, is where the theories come in. 
  • Because the answers are scary, an organized conspiracy to cover up exists.

Finding the Path

I was started on the path by a international client to my security/privacy consulting services. I tend not to get too excited when there is a new conspiracy to consider. I don’t enjoy exercising my insanity all that much, I guess. Rather, if anything, I tend to take a look at it in hopes of proving it invalid, assuming I look at all (Ostrich Syndrome). Disproving is much easier work in the long run, I assure you, where true. You can’t prove a negative hypothesis, but you can prove misinformation, when so. Trouble was, his informational starting points were solid. He gave me a name, and associated facts to get me started.

The start of the path is  one John DiNardo

While no astrophysicist, DiNardo  has credentials sufficient for me to find him credible on the topic: High School Physics Teacher with a degree in Science Education, and a background in electronics, and an ex-Marine electronics specialist. Someone who who understands critical thinking, logic, and principles of scientific study, someone trained not to jump to conclusions, demand proofs which can be tested, and test them. Moreover, in listening to several of his many radio interviews I found him very careful to provide only acceptable, verifiable resources and to go well out of his way to insure there was no misunderstanding of meaning. Better still, things he said which I thought might be challenged, could not.

That was me demanding proofs, and testing. He was right every time when I checked his points. Kudos, JD.

planet x

First waypoint: a USAF satellite and the Pioneer series of deep-space craft

His start takes us next back in time to 1983, and the early 1800s, and even thousands of years earlier. But the key points easiest to grasp and illustrate were in 1983. Two newspaper articles which concretely prove the existence of Planet X and start us on the trail to proof of a conspiracy by means of cover up and disinformation. A New York Times article detailed the launch of a multinational (US, Netherlands, Britain) $80M Infrared Astronomical Satelite specifically to attempt to locate, identify Planet X, and ascertain its trajectory. The article IS worth your brief reading.

It points out that Mount Palomar’s observatory was already tracking the Pioneer shots as they approached Pluto to judge any variation in their trajectories due to the existence of an inbound Planet X, and that the satellite was specifically constructed to find  the dark ‘planet’ (compute the approximate mass and location based on gravitational effect).  It also points out that Planet X has been thought by astronomers to exist because of orbital anomalies of Pluto and Neptune for roughly 200 years, anomalies only possible if impacted by a strong gravitational pull of something very large an relatively near. The article is remarkably uncensored and ‘open’ in content, detail, and style compared to all that has since followed. Someone rendered Planet X news into a black hole.

The second article was exactly 11 months later, to the day, in The Washington Post. By comparison to the former, it is brief, sans much detail, and contains at least three demonstrable falsehoods from official sources, and clear tones attempting to minimize importance. It is almost an apology for existing. The cover up starts here, it seems. The first article already well defined Planet X and its path and destination, and as being part of the Solar System, and states that scientists are “so sure of the 10th planet, they think there’s nothing left but to name it.”  But the official quoted in the second article wants us to think it is another galaxy far away, and not inbound.

“It’s not incoming mail, I want to douse that idea with as much cold water as I can.” “I believe it’s one of these dark, young galaxies that we have never been able to observe before.”  That from the man overseeing the launch and operation of the USAF Satellite, Dr. Gerry Neugebauer.

planet x

Second Waypoint: mysterious deaths

Remember the first article? The two Doctors quoted extensively in the article who were quite open and forthcoming with information, are dead. Some mystery suitable for our flavor of insane thinking do, unfortunately, exist, though certainly with ample plausible deniability, a key element of any good cover up. Dr. Robert S. Harrington died of Cancer while on a field trip tracking Planet X in 1993, attempting to prove it was inbound. Yes, he had recently been diagnosed with cancer, and was engaged in fighting it. No, it was not advanced to the point where it was debilitating, or near terminal, or he would not have undertaken such a field trip.

Yet while on his field trip in Australia, he ‘died of cancer.’ Well, that’s after at least one report that he died of ‘an accident,’ but I’ve not been able to track down that report as mentioned off-hand in an otherwise non authoritative source. Benefit of the doubt, except that…

The other Doctor in the article, Dr. Thomas C. Van Flandern, also died of Cancer in 2009. Nothing quite so distinctively mysterious in his case, perhaps, except that… one other scientist working on revealing Planet X died of Cancer in 2006. Dr. Giacomo Giampieri was an Italian Astrophysicist who was barely 40 years old. I must tell you that there is nothing in the way of evidence to say these were murders, or imply it directly. Yet, it is, of course, the kind of facts that you start with when investigating for possible conspiracy, just like any good Policeman wanting to insure there was no foul play.

But I’m also compelled to tell you that it is a fact that CIA has been known to employ a specific methodology to induce cancerous tumors in targets. I’ve written of their use of radioactive discs in my various books, as have others. While it is not a very fast way to kill someone, it certainly offers plausible deniability, and tends to take them out of the picture well before they succumb. This, the unlikely eventuality that someone near death from cancer would tramp off to the Outback on a strenuous quest, and the odds that all three scientists should coincidentally die of the same cause in opposition to all actuarial table math… leaves us with a question mark which weighs toward wondering if they are not signs of a cover up/conspiracy in the foulest-of-play form. We do not know, but we are required to consider it.

planet x

Third Waypoint: Tactical Distraction; Comet Elenin

Another disinformation tactic commonly used is to distract from one story by creating a ‘bigger’ story. I use ticks because it isn’t always truly bigger, but simply hyped as such. If you can somehow confuse the new story with elements of the old story, you end up with a win win disinfo effort.  Now that DiNardo has been getting a lot of radio interview time and the Planet X conspiracy is taking root in the Web, comes forward the Comet, Elenin, just in time to be useful as disinformation fodder. IT IS A COMET. It has no properties of Planet X. Yet the Web is awash with inference and claims that they are one and the same. They even go out of their way to describe it as ‘The Dwarf Star,’ which is a Planet X descriptor, and talk about it having captive ‘moons’.

Moreover, scientific data is being trotted out to equate Elenin with the kind of catastrophic effects (fears thereof) foreseen for any pass by of Planet X near to Earth. Pole shifting earthquakes, weather upheaval, magnetic storms, etc. Elenin is already ‘here’ for all practical purposes, whereas Planet X, is yet distant in space and time. But you can see through this smoke screen with some basic logic. They point out for example that earthquakes are happening and are synchronous with Elinin and thus ‘proof’ it is Planet X. But wait. Look at the WHOLE of earthquakes and you find them happening constantly. So no matter what event you want to relate an earthquake to (e.g., an Obama speech,) you can find multiple correlating earthquakes that day.

I in fact took the first speech by Obama for which I could ascertain the time – a press statement on economic matters for Aug. 2, 2011, 12:15 ET, the very day I’m writing this.  As it is now 3:24 PM, Pacific, he has already spoken, and so I undertook a look for quakes. There are already 19 quakes today (and ‘yesterday’ across the International Time Line), posted (more may exist and not yet be posted). All but two are near or greater than 5.0 in magnitude and of the general strength as used as ‘evidence’ in the Elenin trash. One was closer to 4.0, and one closer to 7.0. THREE of the 4.0-5.0 category were actually within an hour of his speech, two before, and one after… which means we should ask President Obama never again to speak, via Eleninian fuzzy logic, which chooses to focus only on those facts which sound like they have a bearing, and ignoring the balance of information which contradicts that assumption. Feel free, if you wish.

But let’s make it simpler: comets have virtually no mass for their size and are barely solid objects, and thus have non of the properties of Planet X. PERIOD.

Meanwhile, NASA, normally prone to flood the Web with pictures of all things astronomical, fails to include ANY images for Elenin in their Elenin library, making it easier for wild claims about accompanying moons and the like a’la Planet X. You can find NASA images of Hale Bopp, a lesser comet but of similar conspiracy theory fame (Heaven’s Gate Cult, another mind control thing variously tied to CIA/DOD), but you can only find amateur images, faked images, and artwork depicting Elenin on line. Why, I wonder, is that? Someone prefer us not to have factual information at hand?

Comets come and pass all the time, often relatively close, and not one of them has been called a dwarf star (rightly so), nor accused of causing massive disruptions on Earth of the sort posed for Planet X. The Web is awash with this nonsense, and it smells like a disinfo campaign by professional cyberwarriors, to me. It fits the same pattern seen time and again with all major conspiracies and cover ups. We are a stupid people to swallow the hook, line, sinker, rod, and reel. Only the disinfo angler gets to walk away unscathed.

Planet X

Fourth Waypoint: Silence

What the ****?

Scientists for hundreds of years have been wondering about Planet X with solid evidence it exists, some of it thousands of years old. We spend enough money to put 4,000 kids through a year of college on satellite designed to figure it out… and watch two deep-space craft to get more evidence… and the rock gets so close that a scientist is taking his own portable telescope to the Outback to watch it in person… which also means it is so close that it is starting to reflect light… which also means that it MUST be heading in our general direction (incoming mail, after all)… AND NOT ONE NEWSPAPER OR SCIENCE ARTICLE BRINGS THE SUBJECT UP?  No. Instead, however, whole groups spring up to ‘debunk’ and discredit the deceased, and whole new (and considerably wilder) theories involving aliens, ancient cults and religions — and poser Planet X comets — pop up to sidetrack the path seeker.

And, Mt. Palomar goes black about course deflections of the deep-space craft well before their guys die off. Meanwhile a bit of official disinformation on said deflection seeks to rewrite physics to account for the deflections, and fails to even describe the location and times of the deflections, because that would show their rewrite was bogus. The scientific paper, The Anomalous Trajectories of the Pioneer Spacecraft, is totally bereft of useful data for review of their findings (very atypical of scientists), and is a joint paper written by people from several government funded entities: Jet Propulsion Laboratories (they monitored the craft), Los Alamos National Laboratory (they worry about physics a lot), and the Aerospace Corporation, a major contractor in the project. Authoritative sources, it would seem.

So why do they come up with three different explanations, one of which requires us to believe both ships sprung a leak in thruster fuel, and one of which rewrites physics? The third tries to blame it on faulty data, about as lame as leaks. What galls me is that this report was then passed along and commented upon in various media resources as if it was an outstanding and thorough job. Excuse me, the thing is hardly 20 short paragraphs! All that, and the fact that they rely heavily on government money, gives me significant pause.

Why? Because THAT, is how a cover up is effected. And all that mess and confusion is why I wrote this article! When scientists, academia, media, and government all clam up and, worse, all start slandering truth and truth sayers… the cover up is in evidence. Throw in some mystery surrounding the deaths, and it starts to form a time-honored pattern in cover ups. When those who remain silent depend (largely) on Federal budgets and grants… or when the nasty ‘national security’ blanket descends on one’s work and findings, it is easy to squelch the truth. When most of Media is controlled by military contractors and a few civilians (e.g., Murdoch, Gates,) it is easy to police the squelch. Thus only free thinking independents like DiNardo dare come forward.

But unless free thinking individuals listen to them, it is to no avail. Only you can answer if that be the case, or not. Are you free thinking, or manipulated?

plante x

Path’s final destination: EARTH?

That’s the big question. It’s not IF Planet X is real, or not, it clearly IS real. It’s not if Planet X is inbound, or not, it IS inbound. The question is WILL IT COME CLOSE ENOUGH TO CAUSE HARM, and if so, WHEN, and to what EXTENT?  At this point, because the scientific community is not forthcoming, and media is not seeking, and government is pretending to know nothing, I’m tending to stick with listening to Dr. DiNardo.

Their silence speaks volumes about the possibility that the answer is not one we would hope to hear. Fortunately, listening to Dr. DiNardo is easy to do. He points out, that because of these same silences, not even he is able to give a solid answer. He can only estimate. He has. And I for one hope he is wrong. Because if he is right, I’d better check out a copy of 2012 right away, or just plan to watch the main event in real time and save the rental money for… nothing.

In closing… I’m not including any Related Articles as I might normally do, as the ones I trust are already linked, above. There are so many questionable Web pages out there on Planet X that I simply don’t want to take any more time trying. I got frustrated trying, because so many of them had bogus facts or errors which made them strawman material. I can’t tell you how many seemed to deliberately get names and other factoids wrong. Forgive me, please.

Added material… not exactly an article, but a video featuring material from a BBC documentary  which revealed Nibiru, and which explains what our paranoid government has preferred to cover up in a conspiratorial effort to ‘protect us’ from (something), we must presume. It explains why many people around the World have seen two suns in the sky at sunrise and sunset, and many other phenomenon that otherwise simply made no sense. FASCINATING to watch.

The 33 Axioms of Fascism, part II


From Decode The Matrix: breakthecipher.wordpress.com

by H. Michael Sweeney,
copyright © 2011, ProparanoidPress, all rights reserved
permissions to reproduce available on request to pppbooks at comcast (net)

Fascism

Read the Introduction (part I) here.

c

Fascism is not about Nazism

which merely embraced it.

It is about the New World Order

which invented it.

Thus the modern Fascist symbol is no longer the Swastika…

which must be concealed or disguised if used…

is now the Global spheres of corporate logos…

or Points of the Compass references…

which can be used openly as if code words.

The 33 Axioms:

As to the general nature: 

1  Fascism is an expression of extreme capitalism, and as such, consumes massive resources in material, finances, and cheap labor, and an expression of extreme liberalism, in that it requires collectivism and socialism to control the have-nots.

Fascists do not believe in fiscal responsibilities, ecology, or humanity. They believe only in profits today, at any cost or expense to others. They shield themselves behind a Globalist Agenda pretending through shill Foundations and U.N. Charters to be ‘Economy Building,’ ‘Ghia Friendly,’ and ‘Third-World Enriching.’  These Code Words and many more like them veil the hidden manipulations within such ‘programs’ which actually work in the opposite direction in final analysis. One needs only review the actions of the World Bank to see examples.

2  Fascism most commonly favors or seeks world domination, its most perfect form being a One World Government

And what is a chief description of a One-World Government?  It has a single World Leader. What is such a person called historically?  The Antichrist. Is it any wonder then that Fascists historically and statistically speaking are by and large Satanic or Occultists? Hitler and friends sought World Domination by a single government. So did Communism. Before them so did the Illuminati. Since then, so has the modern Illuminati, the Globalists. They all called it a New World Order in one way or another, and they all shared the same basic planks or stepwise goals for achievement as spelled out by the Illuminati Plan.

A logo does not define a Fascist, but begs a closer look

3  The politics of Fascism serve only the interests of the powerfully rich elite

It is a government by the empowered of the unempowered to usurp more power and wealth. The purest form would be a Corporate State, a TerraCorp, wherein all corporations were shareholders in a Holding Company which was the government. All law and regulation would be for their gain, at the people’s expense.

4  Fascism sees an artificially controlled Monetary Policy as a Major domestic policy tool and a significant foreign policy tool

Control of the printing, availability, and value of Money by instruments such as The Federal Reserve was a primary goal established by the Illuminati Plan to establish a One-World Government they referred to as The New World Order. When you control currency in a country, you control the country. The international banking family of the Rothschilds has met this goal in virtually every Nation, and were a driving force in the establishment and continued control of the FED, which is a privately held corporation, not a branch of the U.S. Government. Mayer Amschel Rothschild has said, “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws.” And why not. If you control money, you control EVERYONE and EVERYTHING indirectly.

Such control allows you to fund whatever you wish, heaping debt upon the masses. It allows Socialism, a tool to make the people both dependent upon and grateful to government. It allows a military of immense size and power. It allows everyone in charge to reap small fortunes at every turn, profiteering directly and indirectly from every Public Trough created by the Bureaucracy.

5  Fascism sees war as a major foreign policy tool and significant domestic policy tool for establishing and maintaining power

They do not care where the war is, the reason, or the outcome. Yes, it is important to them personally that they not get caught in the middle or see their own possessions destroyed. That’s something easy to arrange: just relocate the family and have the government pay for damages when you return. They only care that they get to loan money to both sides and profit from arms sales to both sides. The Rothschilds were famous for doing this, and it was in fact what empowered international banking in the first place.

Hillary Clinton, as described in my book set, Fatal Rebirth, profited handsomely by profits made through her modest investment in a CIA front operating in Canada which illegally sold U.S. arms to both sides of the Iran-Iraq war, one of the bloodiest of all history, and one with no victor, least of all American interests in the region. Wars can be used to punish or weaken a government which is uncooperative, and bolster those which do cooperate, and serves as a ‘patriotism’ tool for domestic control even in the face of severe domestic unhappiness with government which might exist. It can be used to justify Draconian measures and limit freedoms.

6  Fascism sees illicit drug trade as a major domestic policy tool and minor foreign policy tool

Profiteering is assured, generally used to fund black operations with no accountability and full plausible deniability. A War on Drugs forces the price sky high, and can be used to insure that sanctioned drug sales (CIA drug sales, in our case) is protected while unauthorized sellers (the kids running the border and the street gangs) get to go to jail. It increases crime to fund drug habits and allows for repressive laws and establishing large Law Enforcement Agency resources and infrastructure.

You render large populations ‘as lawbreakers’ who must otherwise behave out of fear of prosecution (they get off with a ‘warning’ or fine, but hence forth keep a low political profile). Wars are fought to control access to drugs. Vietnam secured S.E. Asia for CIA. The War on Drugs in South America is selectively fought against the Cartels who are not in bed with CIA, the ones willing to leave the local CIA vetted government alone. The war in Afghanistan secured the vast Poppy Fields for CIA and its partner, the Pakistani ISI (their CIA).

7  Fascism sees oil supply as a major tool useful in both foreign and domestic policy (enforcement)

As it happens, OIL prices do not only dictate profits, they are a major index of WAR. If you review the historical Barrel price of oil from WWII forward, you find a funny thing.  The price of crude will tend to rise to a point where there is a War. It will tend to level and then at the close of the war, it will start to descend. It NEVER descends to a point much lower than half the sum it rose. It then begins to rise, again. When it has risen twice as much as it has fallen, there is another war, and the cycle repeats.  This is the old ‘Two steps forward, and one step backwards’ philosophy of (Communism, the Illuminati, and Fascism) put into formula-matic play.

8  Fascist regime’s ability to survive is directly dependent upon their ability to control, and the means and effort required to control increases in measure with the reduction in or absence of affluence of the lower classes

Thus Fascism MUST become a Police State with Draconian laws. It MUST develop and deploy Political Control Technology to control the hearts and minds of its Citizens. It MUST rely upon disinformation and controlled media as part of that technology. It MUST find ways to hush and eliminate dissent through such control. Thus many of the other Axioms come into play as tools for the purpose.

9 Fascism can flourish and dominate from within any form of government where a police state mentality and/or secret government can be achieved

It need not be an overtly visible Police State. In fact, the more covert, the better. Thus Fascism exists in all forms of government, either operating as a Secret Government in conspiratorial subversion of processes and agencies, or as outright leadership and enforcer.

10 Fascism requires and is built on deceit through secret societies, secret government, and secret activities as tools

The trading of secrets insures loyalty of key players. Intelligence operatives trade such secrets as insurance policies against the Double Cross. Skull and Bonesmen trade such secrets so that they can destroy anyone of their own who dares betray. It is the tool of the keeping and trading of such secrets which itself makes it extremely rare that such secrets are made public. Too many people have too much at stake in the form of a vested interest. The very existence of such secrets, and the need to protect them, means that all else must necessarily be a lie. To conduct affairs amid such lies requires secretive forces doing things covertly. Cover ups abound. Thus media infiltration, manipulation, and Wag-The-Dog damage control becomes paramount.

11 Fascism achieves absolute power grip over key people through blackmail and other forms of intimidation

Where trading of secrets is not sufficient, such as with those who are not anointed, acquiring secrets about people becomes a primary tool in arranging and assuring their cooperation, were they otherwise predisposed to object. Where such is not available, other threats may be required. CIA has repeatedly been caught spying on power brokers in Washington to learn of their sexual or financial indiscretions. Where such cannot be uncovered, it can be manufactured. When a scandal breaks, more than likely, it broke because they refused to cave in. This is how they got rid of Spiro Agnew and Nixon in order to seat Gerald Ford, the man who fed CIA Warren Commission secret meeting content to better enable the cover up of what really happened in Dallas.

12 Fascism relies upon hate and fear to control the people and to distract them from discovering fascism is their true enemy

Divide and conquer. Labeling. Fear mongering. You see it everywhere. People are encouraged to avoid finding areas they can agree upon, and instead urged to hate and expunge EVERYONE who does not think EXACTLY like them. Diversity is supposed to be an asset that builds nations, one of the key principles behind America’s meteoric rise to power. Yet it has been made weapon against us, and is one reason we are fast becoming a has-been nation owned by the Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans. If you disagree with that, we are undoubtedly bitter enemies by default, and thus so, how can we possibly fight Fascism’s dark plans as they unfold around us?

Click here for Part III

Part IV – subscribe to be informed when posted.

%d bloggers like this: