Category Archives: Uncategorized

The Masonic Mystery on the Speaker of the House Podium


Many people ask ‘What is that silver thing on Nancy Pelosi’s desk in the House?’ The answer is, ‘a mystery.’ A Masonic mystery, in several parts. Conspiracy theorists will love this, and everyone else may find the history lesson involved doubly intriguing, for like cause.

 

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook  

Dateline, July 4th, 2019, from the Olympic Peninsula, in the shadow of Liberalism’s scariest Presidential Candidate, Governor Jay Inslee

copyright © 2019, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.

 

What you will learn reading this post, is that:

  • a mysterious object has appeared, vanished, and reappeared on the Speaker of the House Podium, and;
  • people continually ask what it is, when noticed in TV or press shots, and;
  • it is, in simplest answer, a true National treasure, but;
  • the answer given is mysteriously incomplete, even conflicting, as officials admit they know little about it, and;
  • it contains more than six Masonic mysteries of its own, and;
  • they, in turn, imply a Nicolas Cage National Treasure adventure may yet lay ahead, and;
  • that all this may tie into today’s Deep State political strife in subtle but frightening ways.

 

What is that thing?

That is the first thing people ask when they see a bit of odd sparkly shape on Nancy Pelosi’s podium, typically seen in the background during closeup shots of the President when speaking in the House Chamber. The official answers tell us that it is an inkwell stand, which is not exactly an answer that makes sense, without knowing the history… which even the various official experts can’t seem to explain usefully. In fact, they can say little about it with certainty… and much of that would seem conflicting, creating uncertainty. We end up, therefore, with more questions than we started with, and the answers would seem… well, rather conspiratorial.

That’s O.K., because in examining the conspiratorial aspects, we get a free and enlightening history lesson.

 

The first mystery is how it came into use… twice. It was known to exist and be in use (some experts say) in the House of Representatives in 1810, shortly after it was first created by silversmith, Jacob Leonard, as an ornate inkwell stand. Others find no actual documentation before 1826, when a painting of that date shows it in place. However, it is often referenced in ways indicating it was generally believed present in 1810. Now, in those times, quill ink pens were dipped in ink frequently in order to write.  A single dip might only allow a short sentence or sentence segment, or a large, fanciful signature, such as found on the Declaration of Independence. We will have reason to get more into the facts of quill writing, shortly (they become taunting clues in the mystery). But the point is, that quite naturally, inkwells were very common in that time frame, and were often artistic creations in the manner of fine ink pens, we see in use, today — and as such, often involved fine cut crystal and/or precious metals, and even faceted jewels. But the first and most obvious mystery surrounds the dating question, itself.

Because… in the War of 1812, the British invaded Washington, D.C. (and elsewhere), and in 1814, set fire to the Capitol building (in which the Senate and House resided, then, as now). They also fired the White House, and the National Library. There was little in the way of national treasures which survived these fires. First Lady, Dolly Madison, has variously been credited for saving from the White House, several paintings (including the famous Portrait of George Washington) and documents, including several of the original documents which framed our nation, such as the Constitution and Declaration of Independence. As far as the Capitol Building was concerned, accounts indicate nothing was saved. 

And yet, the inkwell in question, apparently survived. It should have melted in the fire, or been thieved for its value. Ergo, SOMEONE found it a far more important thing than anything else… important enough to risk life and limb, to save. We know this, because it reappeared in the Senate some years later. We also know it was not a recreation, because the Jeweler’s trademark stamp is one Jacob employed before the war, and after the war, he used a different stamp, likely because his shop had been raided or even destroyed by British troops looking for plunder.

Rebuilding of the Capital was not begun in earnest until 1917, after the close of the war, a project which also finished the original construction plans interrupted by the War and the fire. Work would not finish until 1829, but the Senate was able to first convene in the building, again, in 1819. While the government had been being conducted in temporary quarters in Philadelphia without the inkwell, for some reason, the inkwell was once more in use by the 1819 Speaker of the House, Senator Frederick H. Gillett. Why this, and only this small a thing was so important to have been saved and restored to use, and only in the Capital building, is nowhere explained in any official dialogs. There is no record as to how it was returned, much less rescued. Virtually every other bit of furniture, artwork, vase, or bric-brac anywhere in the building has a complete traceable historical pedigree… but not this curious inkwell. That brings us to another mystery.

Masonic Influences: The designer of the inkwell stand, Jacob Leonard, was not a particularly well-known silversmith. Prior to this piece, he was best known for making silver spoons, ladles, tongs, and such. He was a coin silversmith, which is to say, like Silver Dollar coins the day, such silverware and art was of solid silver, .900 fine. While little is known of J. Leonard, one fact which ties to the third mystery, implies that the man was a Mason. To be clear, there is no clear proof, but his principle shop, in the general time frame of the inkwell’s creation, was directly across from a Masonic Hall. While that is a weak indictment or proof of Masonic leanings, the artwork, itself, the third mystery, is far more suggestive. But even if not a Mason, himself, it is possible the piece was commissioned by a Mason.

The inkwell is rich with the mystery of secretive Masonic symbolism, much of which ties back to the Mason’s favorite sources for occult mysticism, Rome, ancient Egypt, and dark Middle East religions. This is seen in a series of design elements employed in the inkwell, all of which are atypical of general use in anything short of intentional Masonic symbolism. In other words, nothing normally found on an inkwell, or simple artistic creations outside of Masonic use. Let’s take a look at the piece, to see; a decorated carry stand with four legs and a frame, with handle, to form a cradle for three crystal ink wells with silver caps. 

First and perhaps easiest Masonic symbols to reveal, are the four legs of the tray. Each is made up of three elements; a ball foot, a fasces standing atop the ball, and an entwining serpent climbing the fasces to peer over and protect it at the top. 

The Ball: in Masonic terms, the ball, of which there are four, generally represent the Earth, Geography, Navigation, and Astronomy and attendant orbital affairs, including Earth’s rotation, the daily cycle, or time, itself. The importance of the Ball is also found in a peculiar and popular Masonic pendant, often made of silver. It is mechanical, as it opens up to form a heraldic Roman Cross… but one made up of six Egyptian Pyramids, it being true that ancient Egyptian symbology is the most central of all Masonic mysteries, which high Masons and the Mason’s ‘bible,’ Morals and Dogma, by head Freemason and Satanaist Albert Pike (also a Confederate General who started the KKK) hold in higher regard than the Christian trinity. The Pyramid is said to have been placed at the center of all land mass on Earth, aligned with N,S,E,W, and containing sighting tunnels to astronomical stars. Thus, we see in the inkwells, that the artwork rests upon these symbols, as their supporting architecture; the very Earth and heavens, and the key arts the Masons hold most dear.


The Fasces:
this symbol originates primarily from the Roman Empire, but with some variant history found in Ancient Egypt, as well. In both Egypt and Rome, it was a symbol of power over life and death by governmental authority. It is often associated with edicts written on paper; the power of the official written word. A fully formed Roman fasces consists of an Axe (not all fasces employed the Axe) with its handle wrapped about with rods of wood and bundled tightly with red ribbon, while in Egypt, the ‘Lash’ was a single rod with crook at top from which hung lashes (and used to issue punitive blood-letting lashes), often bound with blue ribbon, and which held identical meaning. It was the fasces symbol which was adopted by Mussolini as the Party symbol for Italian Fascism. Thus, we see that the power of life and death is repeated four times, resting atop of and arising from the Earth and Masonic arts. 

Ironic, then, that the modern American Democratic Party as currently headed by Nancy Pelosi (as Speaker of the House, where the ink wells reside upon her desk), is employing fascist tactics (i.e., ANTIFA ‘Brown Shirt’ style violence, race and victim political pandering, collectivist shaming and boycotts, censorship and disinformation) in its march toward harder political leftist ideologies, and globalism.

 

The Entwining Serpent: this symbol has ancient Egyptian origins tied to the Satanic God, Ishtar, often expressed in Masonic material as an entwining Serpent about the ‘egg’ of creation. In some art, the egg is depicted as an egg-shaped Earth. It relates to creation much in the same way the serpent entwined about the Tree of Life relates to the Biblic story of the creation of Man and the origin of temptation and sin… but giving more power to the Serpent as creator and divine force, as one might attribute to Luciferian identities, which is exactly what Ishtar, is.  A serpent, of course, can also represent death or deadly threat. That there are two intertwined serpents are found on the winged staff of the medical cadeusus emblem, relates to the fact that early physicians often sold poisons, as well as cures, and that sometimes, the cure proved fatal.

 

A Mystery Trio: there is also mystery in the number of ink wells, and the actual ‘wells,’ themselves. It serves no purpose for there to be so many. In the time of its making, and especially when dealing with official documents where long-lived preservation was of concern, the only viable inks available in the day were ‘iron gall’ inks made of Iron sulfate and tannic acids, or similar constructs. The only color available was black, though the acidic nature of it would react with various papers (in some cases, eating away the paper, as some degree of sulfuric acid would result) in ways which might create a brownish writing, or with age, wax grayish. It might be mixed with blue aniline dye to form a blue-black ink, which would appear blue when written, but later become black. While colored inks existed for non quill writing instruments (i.e., brushes), the quills required a higher degree of liquidity only available with iron gall inks. As stated, quill pens did not hold much ink at a time, and frequent dipping was commonly required.

So why three wells? In Masonry, there are three Degrees all Masons must first proceed through to become Master Masons. There are three chief officers or posts to each Lodge, each of which, like the Speaker of the House, employ a gavel as symbol of authority… the gavel itself a Masonic symbol, but nothing like that associated with the instrument of law; is is more about the character traits of Masonic leaders. There are also the Masonic concepts of the three Greater Lights and the Three Lesser Lights of Masonic Illumination, which is reflected in the three greater volumes of the wells outer size, vs. the the three lesser actual contents, each of which, by their differing shapes (faceted and cubical, vs rounded and semi-conical, as seen in the image), provide and entirely different reflective, refractive, and transmittal properties of light (there is even a rainbow tinge seen in one of the faceted faces of the right-most well, for instance). Interesting also to note, that the three wells are not identically cut: the facets are larger on the left-most well.

A secondary aspect of the ink well mystery which I find rather curious, is the extremely small interior well capacity, within the rather large (by comparison) bottles. One normal bottle of the same size with full capacity for ink, would easily allow the full Senate to sign a document… whereas all three of these bottles, with their tiny chambers, would be found insufficient — as based on my own experience with quill pens in a high-school chemistry class project where we made our own ink, and then used it. 

The Handle Mysteries: the handle employs a curious set of stylized flowers (presumbly flowers), showing two rows of 7 petals, each. No flower has 14 petals. It may simply be artistic license, but the number 14 has meaning to Masons, tied to both the phases of the Moon, and the death and dismemberment of the Egyptian God, Osiris, into 14 parts. Osiris is the God of the Underworld (Luciferian connection) and of the Moon (natch) who wields the Flail (fasces connection). That there are four of these ‘flowers’ (two per side) on the ink well stand, ties well with the four main phases of the Moon, within which, there are 14 days of ‘lunar darkness’ in the waning Moon. 

Next, look at each base of the handle. We see that it is designed to pivot, presumably to give better access to the ink wells, though one descriptive of the piece makes it sound like it automatically opens the wells. I don’t think so; there is no visible connection to the well caps, and no photos with the handle moved aside show open caps. But each ‘hinge’ forms a ball which is seemingly the same size as the feet, but unlike the feet, each has four ‘leaf-like’ shapes rising upward. Two are, one each, affixed to each of hubs of the hinge, while one rides on on each side with the handle when pivoted. Notice two things: one, is that the ‘leaves’ are different on the left, than on the right, and that if you look carefully, they are not actually like leaves, at all, not even presuming them stylized. The other, is that they give these ‘balls’ the appearance of the Masonic Balls in the unlatched position, which enables their opening. The one curiosity to Masonic Balls, is that the one thing which was not a constant in their design, was the latches, which these leaves resemble, when the Balls are in the unlatched state. This may tie to the final mystery, next.

The Final Mystery: it is found in the construction of the walls. A silversmith has many ways of fastening two pieces of silver together. The most common is to solder with silver, which appears to be in use on the work. Another is to establish a press fit, as in the backs of a pocket watch. Yet another is to create silver clasps which can grip the added piece into place. Nowhere in silver work (not that I am expert), have I seen use of rivets, screws, or bolts. Yet silver rivets are found in the walls of the ink well. Two are used to attach each of the two Elegant Eagle oval shaped pieces (one Eagle per lengthwise side), and two are used to attach the ‘cloth bunting’ drapes on each side of each eagle. But none are used to attach the drapes on the end sides. This makes little sense.

Also curious, is that the rivets on the Eagle sections are visible both on the interior and exterior of the wall, passing through fully. But not so on the bunting drapes, where they are visible on the wall (look to far interior wall, just right of the right-most bottle), but not on the outside of the drapes (left-most interior wall). Tied to this observation is that the eagle piece could easily have been assembled either via solder or a press fit, or clasps, as is true of the bunting… and that the eagle appears to be upon a plate which is bowed outward, implying the possibility (by shape and the fact of rivets) of a hollow chamber… perhaps with something being hidden, within. The resemblance of the handle’s balls to the Masonic Ball pendant’s, also points to the possibility that something may be hidden, within. If one wanted more reasons to suspect such, look at the handle, itself, again. It has an oval which exactly matches the Eagle’s oval in size, shape, and central positioning, and the ‘flower’s are positioned in perfect sympathy with the inset rivets holding the Eagle into place… if they even are actually rivets. They may simply be clues deliberately placed to draw one’s mind to discovery… if knowing something was hidden, and in need of recovery. 

I find myself recalling the National Treasure movie series, the one where the Templar Treasure was found following a set of clues hidden in various ways, each pointing to the next, until at last, the treasure might be reclaimed. I don’t for one moment believe the inkwell fits that bill… because my research for my book set, Fatal Rebirth, revealed the far greater likelihood is that the templar treasure is actually the wealth used to create the Rothschild banking empire… and that the Rothschilds were not jewish money changers, but Templars in hiding among the Jews, as such. No money changer could have amassed that much wealth, even in several generations of family members in the trade. It also revealed that many Templars went into hiding by becoming (and eventually taking over) the Masonry Guild… in time becoming Freemasons. But one thing is for certain.

The Speaker of the house has one very mysterious object on her podium… one perfectly useless to its original function, even upon its first creation… but quite useful symbolically… to someone — especially if a Mason. Whatever purpose made it thus useful is also an unknown, but we do know it was significant and important enough to risk life and limb, and to originally install it, and to later restore it, with some level of quiet secrecy. The ties between the Freemasons and the Illuminati, and between the Illuminati and the modern equivalent ‘Round Table Groups’ like the Club of Rome, Bilderbergers, Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission… and between the Masonic guilds and the masonic-like constructs of secret societies such as the Thule, the Skull and Bones, and the Knights of Malta, etc… all lead me to find this mystery very tasty, if not conspiratorial.

It is truly, a National Treasure, one perhaps worthy of yet another movie?

REVOLUTION 2.0: Would Military back Constitutionalists or Socialist/Communist?


Progressive leftist/fascists seem to be pressing for armed-conflict by trashing the 2nd Amendment (and other atrocities), confident they own the military’s loyalty. They don’t, but that simple answer is worthless, and for a long list of scary reasons.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net 

Dateline, March, 16, 2019, from the Olympic Peninsula, in the shadow of Califoregoshington

copyright © 2019, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.
 

Reading, you will learn:

  • that a military or political coup in America has been attempted in the past;
  • half the country thinks one is in works as you read;
  • the possibility of success can be judged by comparing the present to the past;
  • that analysis is important regardless of which side of politics you sit, and;
  • it is scary to contemplate, because it points to blood being spilled.

An important question

The question I have posed in my books since before the turn of the Century was this: what would happen if there is an attempt to take over the government by some form of coup, or to subvert/destroy the Constitution, such as seizure of guns from citizens or abandoning of National Sovereignty to the North American Union and the New World Order? The simple answer is a civil war, or what I term Revolution 2.0. There is both a right and duty of revolution, which reveals this truth: when a Country makes laws which fly in the face of logic, natural law, Constitutional law, and the laws of your lawfully chosen faith… and endanger the nation’s future and safety, it’s time to overthrow that government. That answer itself leads to many more questions, such as, what does it take to start a revolution, and how close are we to having one? But the most important one to participants in any such civil unrest, and which this post attempts to answer, is this:

which side will the military back in such a revolution, and how real is the possibility that the military might choose wrongly?

This post is an in-depth analysis, and as result, is about a 30 minute read with some important, unexpected, and revealing content… surprising even me, in fact… and I’ve been writing (in warning) on this topic for nearly two decades. If you are the sort who prefers sound bite news, just skip to the last section (In Summary), so you can simply confirm your belief bias without gaining any actual knowledge, be it agreeing with me, or discounting my findings in your ignorance of the facts which lead to that conclusion. That is your choice, to make, and your responsibility to choose. The same will be true of Revolution 2.0, where wrong choice based on ignorance could have serious consequences for you, your family, your country, and the World.

In seeking an answer, it should be noted that fascist-minded megalomaniacs have existed within all Militaries since the dawn of the institution; such personalities are naturally drawn to military and Police, and tend to rise in the ranks to positions of command. Regardless of any outer political views they wear on their sleeves, they tend to be fascist/police-statists in their thinking. More so, in America, perhaps, since 1947, when the DOD and CIA were founded, and the Military Industrial (and Intelligence) Complex was ‘invented.’ I have since added the liberal media cabal to the complex, resulting in the nick-name, MIIM. Every generation has them; people who find fascism more useful to their rise to power than they see in guarding your freedom and rights. There are several important illustrations of this in our history, and they reveal that some among US military leadership are well capable of siding with the wrong side… perhaps even engineering a reason for a conflict which might enable or excuse a coup.

Some call it a ‘Deep State mentality.’ I call it New World Order thinking.

Note: while this post is made in an America where, at the moment, the greatest threat capable of forcing civil conflict comes from progressive leftists… and while that group embodies and employs elements of the Deep State, Fascism, and globalist New World Order agenda… the Deep State, Fascism, and the New World Order has allies on both the left and right, almost always in the extremest versions, thereof — in almost EVERY country on the planet. You can’t tell your players without a program, and while some players stick out visibly on both sides, no one is publishing a program. Trust no establishment politician, international corporation, or anyone promoting extreme liberalism, socialism, communism, or extreme conservativism or nationalism. Ferris Bueller was right: “A person shouldn’t believe in isms. They should believe in themselves.”

We know, for instance, that the Military has worried about a possible not-so ‘civil war’ between the branches, between units within a branch, or individual soldiers within a unit, for some time. The rank and file of the military is by and large duly patriotic, mindful that they are not to obey unlawful orders, and understand and honors their Oaths to uphold and protect the Constitution. Yet they are also trained to obey without question. No military in the World can do both well, simultaneously, in times of conflict. Unlawful orders transpire, and are obeyed by most, and to disobey can be seriously punished, with any such incidents typically swept under the carpet. No one wants to be a vanquished martyr for a silenced and unheard cause.

The proof of military’s concern over this paradoxical is in the form of a questionnaire since referred to as the ’Shoot Americans Questionnaire,’ which has been given to various sampled units in various branches over the years. The good news is, not too many soldiers indicated they would obey orders to fire on Americans who, for instance in just one of several scenario questions, “refused to turn in their guns.” Other questions about use of deadly force related to other causes or issues of some concern, here, such as if the soldier would be willing to swear allegiance to United Nations Commanders, in deference to US law (it did not mention US law). 

That questionnaire arose out of our second evidence, the Revolution in Military Affairs. RMA is the notion that as modern technology and political realities evolve, the military needs to adapt its war fighting policies, tactics, and capabilities to maximize efficiency and reduce chances of failures. Nothing wrong with that; all militaries do it. However, in the 70s and 80s, it literally became a field of think-tank study within the military, and frequently a common topic of discussion the the U.S. Army’s War College publication, Parameters. Within its pages, according to an article which appeared in the now defunct Washington D.C. Newspaper, The Spotlight, was an RMA based article which defined the ‘new face’ of America’s next new war. In fact, as I recall, the piece was titled ‘America’s New War,’ which was, ironically, exactly the propagandist terms media used to describe the war to liberate Kuwait.

In the quotes from the Parameters pages, the next new kind of warfare which needed to be planned for would be with “former military, militia, patriots, constitutionalists, and the poor and disenfranchised.” Excuse me? Since when are such the enemy of the State? When did the military start thinking the government is so far afield from righteousness that the military must plan for waring with upset citizens? Why should any who so think be allowed the command of force of arms? But that is not all. RMA also established something called the “21st Century Politico-Military Force Matrix,” which is largely the marriage of local law enforcement and military actions in a matrix of options for dealing with unruly civilian populations. Then there is MOOTW, “Miltary Operations Other Than War,” which provides clear operating strategies for interactions with citizens as potential combatants, including use of force of arms. It has also been called “The People’s War” by the military… for dealing with a civilian uprising.

Finally, there is the dramatic increase in development of psychological warfare technologies (mind control) and non-lethal weaponry… for military application against civilian populations. This is sometimes referred to as the Forth Epoch War, and I’ve written whole books on that, and one of them, The Professional Paranoid Defensive Field Guide, lists nearly 500 technical terms which represent the sum total of such weaponry, methodologies, and strategies. Among them are terms representing the construction and use of whole fake communities which can in no way be taken for anything but American towns, where training exercises regularly take place in door-to-door searches, traffic blockade/check point vehicle searches, and storming of buildings in SWAT-like operations.

If that were not enough, there have been actual training exercises in a long list of major and lesser American cities (i.e., LA, Houston, Chicago, etc.), much to the alarm of citizens who were NOT informed of the operations until AFTER they are completed… event though in some cases direct citizen confrontation, detainment, and questioning had been involved… often by Psychological Warfare units. At times, civil rights had been violated or citizen’s safety put at risk. This has been going on for more than four decades, and it has been getting more blatant and frequent every four years or so (an interesting characteristic, given election cycles).

 

Finding clues within previous coup attempts

The answer as to which side the military would take in such a scenario, is the same as would seem to worry the Pentagon, based on the questionnaire and their significant focus on civilian confrontation in RMA. I have always believed, that the inescapable answer is BOTH — resulting in rebellions amid the military, itself, both within and between branches, and within units. There have been two well-played-out but failed attempts at a military coup in America which serve as models of any such scenario, and these deserve some scrutiny. The first one was real (the 1933/34 Business Plot to depose President Roosevelt and establish a Fascist government), and served as a model for the second, which is where we will start for reasons beneficial to context of any Revolution 2.0. The most recent was a fictional depiction written by Political writer/researcher (Fletcher Knebel) and a former Editor of a major newspaper (Charles W. Bailey II). I’ll start there.

Though their book, Seven Days in May, was indeed fiction, it was extremely well researched and quite factual in its underpinnings, and enjoys the modern context of the Department of Defense and Joint Chiefs of Staff, which did not exist in 1933. The book was a best seller and makes excellent reading, but it was also made into a box office hit you can watch online, starting Kirk Douglas and Burt Lancaster. There are several reasons it makes a good model, despite its fictional nature; it was based on factual basis relevant to our time, then, and now.

The movie was produced in the shadow and conspiratorial clouds leading to the assassination of John Kennedy, of which many people wondered if that ugly scar in America’s history was a plot involving some sort of political coup. Indeed, many clues uncovered over time pointed to military involvement. One was that the usual way the local National Guard military participation in Presidential visits was ordered to stand down, not unlike what happened in the Clinton/Obama Benghazi debacle resulting in the deaths of Marines and Embassy Officials, there. Another was the intrigue and conflict between Kennedy and the Joint Chiefs over the war in Vietnam, the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Bay of Pigs Invasion; the war hawks thought him soft on Communism. 

Moreover, Kennedy had turned down the Joint Chiefs plan to fake a series of false-flag ‘Cuban terrorism’ events to justify an full out invasion and ousting of Castro, called Operation Northwoods… which also happens to be the blueprint visibly in play in the terror events leading to 9-11 attacks and the series of Middle East oil wars predicted in my book set, Fatal Rebirth — which predicted both the WTC downing by false-flag jetliner terrorism and the resulting oil wars in 1999, nearly two years before the attack. The Knebel/Bailey book itself was also written as a kind of harbinger of possible things to come based on many of the above difficulties between Kennedy and the Chiefs, and, ironically, Kennedy himself was quite fond of the book, likely recognizing aspects of the plot line to his own mirrored reality. 

Sadly, he did not give it enough due, or he might have been able to foresee the deadly future which lay ahead for him… and perhaps, even forestall the use of Northwoods in our more recent history. The name Northwoods itself, by the way, was based on WWII Nazi operations of like false-flag nature… and the name Northwoods references Germanic translation, ‘Wald Im Norden’ (woods in/of the north) which also describes the invasion of Poland, which began WWII… the German Army swarmed into Poland from the forests to it’s North as did the air Blitzkrieg which overflew it. The fascists would, thereby, engulf the World in flame for a second time.

Note: Should the reader doubt any prime point within this post, they should hold final opinion until watching Seven Days in May. It will be well worth your time on an entertainment basis, alone. It is absolutely critical to understand the relationship of the various branches of service, how troop movement, material (weapons, munitions, supplies) and funding are manipulated within the context of the Department of Defense, and Presidential/Congressional oversight. The education, alone, is also motivation enough to watch the movie… as is the fact that much of the dialog is quite unhappily the same you are hearing on TV from commentators and politicians today; treason is afoot, for real, and as in the film as well as in 1933. But the key point in common with both the film/book and partially true in the Business Plot (there was no Air Force in ’33), was the absolute need to include the Marines and Air Force in key roles on one side or the other… and a means to ‘exclude’ non participants in the plot from interference as the coup unfolded. 

Fascism brings us back to the Business Plot, which was undertaken by fascist business leaders of the most famous kind, including Bush, Harriman, Singer, DuPont, Hearst, Heinz, Mellon, Morgan, and others. But it was deemed that the plot could not succeed without a (then retired) Marine, one General Smedley Butler, who was the most popular military figure in the country, at the time. Butler was approached and ‘recruited’ to lead an uprising of unhappy Veterans who were owed money by the Government and unable to collect because of the Great Depression, which was also the source of unhappy ire of the businessmen. Butler’s role, if undertaken as intended, was to lead some 500,000 Veterans in ‘revolt,’ to seize the Capitol and depose or destroy the President, and hold Congress hostage, pending satisfactory reformation of a new government model. 

Such a plot could not dare being risked unless assured that the military would both be unable to respond quickly enough to prevent the coup, and once in place, would not dare confront Butler and his civilian army (called the Bonus Army), or their fascist backers. Clearly, the backers of the plot must have had some private assurances from at least the Army, if not the Navy, that there would be no objection. The Chief of Staff (highest ranking General in command of the Army) in 1933 was Douglas MacArthur, who clearly did not get along well with Roosevelt, and was thought to be a fascist at heart. His counterpart in the Navy, Chief of Naval Operations, was Admiral William V. Pratt, who was very unhappy with the depression, as it had forced severe reduction of Naval forces, and threatened to merge the Coast Guard and the Navy, an idea which he opposed vehemently. The Commandant of the Marine Corps, Ben Herbard Fuller, also a JCS equivalent, was similarly suffering retrenchment because of the depression, and deeply respected Butler and MacArthur. To be clear, neither Fuller or Pratt have ever been accused of fascist leanings, as had been MacArthur, but a change in power favoring the military would not have hurt their wishes for a stronger military to command. 

Thankfully, Smedley was a patriot who refuse the recruitment, and he instead exposed and thwarted the plot before it could get off the ground… though there was also a failed assassination attempt involving an Italian immigrant of fascist viewpoints in 1933. And, in the TV series, City of Angels (a TV spin-off of the Movie Chinatown, staring Wayne Rogers), the greater plot line in a three-part season opener (The November Plan) featured a foiled attempt to assassinate Roosevelt in a trip to California. That ‘fictional’ plot line was based in factual realities (subject to Hollywood license, of course), and did involve Smedley Butler as well as soldiers in uniform intent on betraying Roosevelt. The screenplay was by well respected researcher and writer of crime/detective drama, Stephen J. Cannell.

Now let us similarly disect the 1963 example…

The other key player in Seven Days of May was an Air Force General. Modern troop and material movement requires the coordinated support of the US Air Force. It was, in fact, this critical role which was the underlying plot mechanism of Seven Days in May, and quite critical to our understanding of what it would take for a modern coup to succeed. Therefore, with respect to Revolution 2.0, and Deep State influence over possible military opposition against Constitutionalists, those seeking to destroy the Constitution will need to include support of the Air Force, as well. The Army is less a concern, because the bulk of the standing Army is in deployment, and because each State’s National Guard is available to the Governors of each State in case of ‘civil unrest,’ which is what they would call the matter, seeking to hide the truth from the public: that any revolution was to save and restore Constitutional law against traitors. 

If the State was run by liberals, the National Guards could be activated by the Governor against the ‘rebels,’ as they might also be termed for political propaganda expediency. If the State was conservative, the DOD could order the Guard to stand down (so as not to aid the ‘rebels’) or be activated at the Federal level to oppose the patriots. That could be true only if the majority of Joint Chiefs were on board with the unconstitutional effort underway. Stateside regular Army could potentially be directed to fill in where National Guard units or their Governor refused to stand down or comply with Federal activation. That would be an example of ‘civil war’ between elements within a given branch of the Military, and it is expected that any such use of troops, regardless if acting on Federal or gubernatorial orders, would experience conflict within their ranks, seriously inhibiting their efficiency.

In like manner, the Navy is largely out of the picture; the bulk of it is also on station around the World, and it is not well poised to impact ground actions within the borders of the US, short of coastal regions. In Seven Days of May, the Navy simply stood down. The same should be true of the Coast Guard, perhaps more so. Amid all of this, there is an added problem which provides a logical reason to stand down. Specifically, in such a coup, the military still needs to insure unfriendly actors such as China, N. Korea, Iran, or even Russia… did not take advantage of an America engaged in civil war. They might, for instance, choose to wax adventurous against allies, or even against US forces. Ergo, the Navy and much of the strategic Air Force would need to devote their attention to World affairs; standing down from any major role in the revolution would be tactically wise. And, in the next section, we will see ample reason for concern over their ability handle two conflicts simultaneously, both at home and abroad.

Perhaps we ought take a close look at Obama’s JCS, still now in place, and see what’s going on with them, in like-comparison.

 

What about today’s Joint Chiefs?

We must compare the two historical examples against today’s potential for replay. Looking back to 1933 and 1963, what about 2023, or some other current time frame? How does today’s situation compare, to then? Politically, there were fascist undercurrents mainly in the business community in 1933, where in 1963, the fascists were additionally present in the military industrial (and intelligence community) complex. They still exist to some degree in both sectors, today… but there is more afoot. Today, we see socialist/communist/anarchists and progressives on the Left using fascist tactics, including members of Congress. They are pitching socialism, but acting like fascists.

Today’s environment, then, is not so different from the past, and is perhaps worse, in final analysis… so what about the key military players at the Pentagon? How do they, and their resources, compare to the 1933 and 1963 scenarios?

In 1933, there was no Air Force, but there was a retired Marine at least thought able to raise a civilian ‘Bonus Army’ army of veterans, and a presumed friendly Army Chief of Staff. Butler was a key military resource. In 1963, it was once more a Marine in the book/screen play (Kirk Douglas) who busted a coup attempt… a plot orchestrated by an Air Force General who was the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and three JCS (Army, Air Force, Marines — Coast Guard did not have representation in 1964), while the Navy Joint Chief who was aware, wanted no part of it, but yet remained silent of it.

In 1933, Butler was retired, the most likely candidate to orchestrate such a coup. Today, the pro liberal/progressive/fascist forces would likely be stirred to replay 1933 with the likes of Retired Army General Tommy Franks, who was Clinton’s right-hand military man… the man who ordered the flame throwing tank and commanded at Waco. As such, he enjoys free access to anyone in the Pentagon on at least an informal basis, and still holds a security clearance. As a Deep State operative, he could become the organizing and communications agent in any such modern-day plot. He also has many friends and contacts within the military industrial (MIIM) complex. He meets the 1933 model, as a recruitment target/tool — one I feel unlikely to adopt Butler’s patriotic response.

And the plot in 1963 required at least the bulk of the Joint Chiefs to participate, or be cowered into silence. The Joint Chiefs today consist of one four-star General to represent each branch of service, including someone to represent the Coast Guard and the National Guard, plus a Chairman and vice Chairman, for a total of seven top-echelon decision makers. Today, thanks to Obama, the JCS consists of two Marines and three US Air Force Generals to form a ‘heavy weighting’ of representation to the same two branches deemed important in 1963. I say thanks to Obama, because he conducted a purge of some 266 top-ranking military officers, and oversaw a rapid series of promotions necessary to put his personally approved people into the JCS chairs.

One Marine, General Joseph Dunford, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, owes his position to that purge with a series of four rapid-paced promotions and appointment to the post by Obama. He is the most powerful man in the military, the counterpart to the 1963 role played by Burt Lancaster in film, though a Marine, instead of Air Force. The Vice Chairman, however, is Air Force (Paul J. Selva), also appointed by Obama with six rapid promotions. The Joint Chief of the Marines, General Robert Neller, had three promotions under Obama to his post, making two Marines in total. 

The Joint Chief of the Air Force, General David L. Goldfein, enjoyed five promotions under Obama, and Air Force General Joseph L. Lengyel (making the third Air Force General) is JCS representing the National Guard. He had five promotions under Obama, while Admiral John M Richardson, Navy’s JCS, had only one promotion under Obama… it perhaps being understood in the 1963 model that the Navy is a non-critical player in a coup. In like relationship, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, Admiral Karl L Schultz, a de facto 8th JCS… appointed by President Trump, as was General Mark A Milley, the Army’s Joint Chief. Again, the Army is a conflicted player, both by virtue of deployments and National Guard complications, the one branch of the services most likely to be at war with itself in a coup-like or Revolution 2.0 scenario.

And, it would appear that Obama’s bevy of purge-replacement military officers have been quietly sabotaging the military in ways which make national defense abroad that much harder, perhaps shifting capabilities to a homeland conflict (I hate using that fascist term, ‘homeland’). In fact, difficult enough that the Air Force, by way of example, might not be able to provide any aid to patriots, or be a factor against them, at all, outside of material and troop transport. If today’s Air Force capabilities analysis is any clue, President Trump no longer has a full deck of military cards to play. A conflict at home and abroad would tax any Trump effort to support Constitutionalists, even were the DOD not under the control of Deep State plants.

 

Monkey wrench conspiracy theories

One tool the Air Force has which could prove extremely troublesome if aligned with treason, is Command Solo. There are 21 Command Solo aircraft, all based at Pennsylvania’s National Guard; specially modified C-130s capable of significant mind control capabilities via Political Control Technology (PCT). I find it troubling that such capabilities are National Guard, rather than Regular Army or Air Force, making it all that much easier to use against citizens. A single plane can impact a two-five State region, depending on State sizes. All of them fly regular training flights, unless in use overseas in a combat theater.

Impact? The Air Force has admitted that they were used in Bosnia to sway elections, and in Iraq to convince thousands of Iraqi crack troops to surrender to small drones which were essentially RC model airplanes with cameras. The chief weapon the plane has is the interception of local radio and television broadcasts, which it then embeds with hidden inaudible subliminal messages which the subconscious mind does absorb. Such messages can be of any desired simple but endlessly repeated phrases or key words (such as ‘surrender, turn in your guns, vote Democrat’) for rebroadcast at a stronger signal strength than the original. The secondary weapon is more insidious; EEG entrainment.

Human brainwaves for emotions operate at ultra low frequencies, and are roughly the same across population samples. If the desired emotional state of being is broadcast at signal strengths greater than that of the brain, the brain adopts them as its own (is entrained). By combining subliminals with emotional state manipulation, such as an abiding and overwhelming fear, Command Solo can impact tens or hundreds of thousands of people while in the air. In such use, it can fly 24/7 with required stops for refueling and crew changes, or in rotation with another Command Solo aircraft.

The training flights they fly involve preprogrammed mission tapes representing ‘harmless’ subliminals and EEG patterns to be used, but not even the operators on board, or their commanders, have any way of knowing what the content actually is (presumed to be ’empty’ of content.) So when they fly training missions, they could very well be telling Democrats to be outraged about everything, violent, etc., and no one would be the wiser, except the person who ordered the tapes to be made, and used, and the computer operator who created the tapes.

Watching your emotions and being alert for changes in that and any unexpected thought patterns which represent something contrary to your original belief structures, is your only clue the plane is being used. The average person won’t question. The strong-willed and alert, can detect, and can resist, if strong minded and inwardly alert. The other clue is seeing the aircraft in the air. A good spotting scope, rifle scope, or telephoto lens can easily recognize if a suspected plane is a C-130 with the Command Solo configuration. Command Solo, and other PCT are well covered in terms of detection and defense in my book, MC Realities.

Another wildcard conspiracy theory is “UN Intervention,” and I here draw upon the ten years of research documented in my book set, Fatal Rebirth. There have largely been two waves or versions of this theory, and both are based in demonstrable facts nonetheless consistently denied by both US military and the UN, itself. The first took hold back the 1990’s and a bit before, with origins earlier than that, tied to far-right thinkers and political forces, such as retired General and US Senator, Barry Goldwater, who foresaw the New World Order’s rise through the U.N. In the 90’s, large numbers of people were seeing and reporting long trainloads of flatbed cars loaded with white U.N. military vehicles, as well as similar on river barges and tractor-trailer units, sometimes in convoys on American highways. Other reports talked of holding areas with hundreds of units parked in neat rows, typically surrounded by military quality fencing and guard stations manned by ‘Men in unmarked black uniforms.’ 

Most of the 43 United Nations ‘Biospheres’ in some cases rendered off-limits to citizens and subject to UN control as part of Agenda 21.

This was also the same time frame when people hiking in select wilderness areas were encountering armed soldiers, also in unmarked black uniforms who were apparently conducting some kind of drill or operation. Invariably, they were said to have been speaking both English and a foreign language of some sort, and ordering civilians away at gunpoint, advising they had entered a military compound. Many of these reports of vehicles and soldiers made the newspapers in one form or another, sometimes with pictures, but the military and the UN denied any validity. Some of these events and UN vehicle stockpiles were indeed in ‘wilderness’ areas tied to the 43 United Nations Biospheres regions, which is its own Agenda 21 conspiracy topic.

The U.N., for instance, has officially insisted it has no men or vehicles in North America, and does not use the types of vehicles being spotted. Most were identifiable as American WWII era, or more modern US Army vehicles, and many more were of Soviet manufacture. And, at the time, large numbers of Soviet military equipment, including helicopters, trucks, tanks, rocket batteries, and even specialized units such as CBRN (Chemical Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear) decontamination trucks were being brought into the country by someone, sighted variously in transit or storage in either original Soviet or UN colors… no unit or national markings lest it simply be ‘UN.’

Let’s take just one very interesting and well documented case (my 1990 research, plus the Spotlight in the same timeframe), to drive the point home. It involves Soviet ARS-14 biological/chemical warfare trucks shipped from West Germany through the firm Beesh Merkator to Gulfport, MS, then by barge to Scranton, Iowa to a company, Airmar Resources, Corp, operated by Lt. Col. A. R. Koval Sr., USAF, retired. Koval told the Spotlight that the units were purchased for Germany and destined for UN forces in Europe after refurbishing, contrary to UN statements it does not, by policy, use Soviet equipment of any kind.

These units have been in the U.S. for nearly a decade. US made, mfg says they are for use overseas, but UN denies using US vehicles or having inventory in America.

The investigation continued, revealing that from Scranton, they were transited to various destinations in America through firms named Newway and Scranton Manufacturing. The later firm, contrary to Airmar Resources claims, said the trucks were being converted to ‘garbage trucks,’ but the EPA said it would be impossible for those vehicles to be made to meet vehicle standards. Scranton responded that they were destined for European markets, but one has to ask about the cost effectiveness of buying and shipping trucks from Europe to America for modifications, and then shipping them back to Europe. Scranton at the time indeed offered a line of new garbage trucks, but none were of Soviet origin. All were, like the Soviet units, painted white, of course. A nifty cover story that almost works, if you don’t look too closely. 

And, as stated, the modified trucks were tracked to US destinations, not Europe. One, in fact, spotted in California on a flatbed truck, was leaking noxious smelling liquids which made the witness sweat profusely and ill to his stomach. Marked with a sign “Quarantined by US Department of Agriculture,” the fluid was being drained into a trench by men in protective clothing. Both Newway and Scranton Manufacturing are alternate names for a small but troubled firm associated with Bede Jet Corp, the maker of small fiberglass civilian jets (build-it-yourself kits) like the one James Bond (Roger Moore) used to attack Castro’s air base in the opening sequence of Octopussy. Newway, in fact, also made Bede-designed, Honda-powered, fully enclosed two-seat motorcycle-car kits, also of fiberglass. 

The more recent wave of UN concerns is fare easier to demonstrate (the images above, for instance), and involves UN intervention officially in place. It comes from the Obama Administration’s invitation for the UN sponsored program referenced as the Strong Cities Network. Based on selling fear of terrorism, in particular, ‘home-grown extremists,’ the program calls for United Nations help to member Cities in the Network. The help goes directly to and influences the Police Departments within the network, as well as city management. On the surface, as sold to citizens in the fear mongering, it sounds like a way to gain some expertise in combating terrorism. But that is a deliberately false narrative. 

Interesting: Obama is said to be slated to be next Secretary General of the UN…

Conspiracy theorists early-on tried to warn people it was a dreadful mistake and a trap. Now, even non theorists are proving the conspiracy is no theory, and far more serious than even early theorists, had thought. It turns out that the Strong City Network acts as its own Law Enforcement Agency, and is empowered to actually govern member cities. Cities which join the network essentially are subject to UN Rule of law, rather than the US Constitution. Currently, New York, Atlanta, Denver, and Minneapolis are members, and a push is underway for Boston, west-coast cities, and elsewhere, to follow suit. In the event of a civil war/revolution scenario, the framework and base structure for a UN interference will already be in place. All they need to do, is to make the announcement, and fly in their people and equipment to make it stick. Because it was blessed by Obama, it would be difficult for anyone to object, including the military — unless and until President Trump or some other President revokes the program and so orders, at least.

There is a final ‘conspiracy’ matter which counters the other two, in impact: a secret military within the military. When researching my book, Fatal Rebirth, I was contacted by an active Officer of high rank in the US Military who knew of my work through my appearance on Coast to Coast with George Noory. He advised that there was, within each branch of the service, a secret group of Officers of some importance, and positioned across the full spectrum of unit function (i.e., Intelligence, combat, support, communications, etc.) Their purpose was to be prepared for, on watch for, and to activate should there be any unlawful (unconstitutional) effort to effect a coup or military takeover. He in fact invited me to become a member, as they did have associations with civilian counterparts they deemed useful. Accepting, they said, I would then have access to information he assured me would be valuable to my book.

However, as the covert security aspects of membership were extremely hight, I did not feel I could manage them… and, I was unwilling to accept responsibility for receipt of classified military or governmental information, which would risk being charged with a crime, if caught. But I was pleased that such men were in place to help insure that unlawful orders against citizens would meet with both covert and overt resistance. I reference this covert patriot group as the ‘Turtle,’ (as in, Revenge of the Turtle, America’s first submarine war vessel used in the Revolutionary war. The Turtle is, and like the Turtle sub, is invisible and hard to find, until it bites.

 

In summary

We see then, that the makeup of the current JCS team engineered by Obama, almost exclusively, is quite weighted to Marine and Air Force, suspiciously Deep State tied, and more than mirrors the key aspects of both the 1933 and 1963 scenarios. We see that was an Obama (Democrat) arrangement through a purge, as part of setting up his Deep State. We see that Obama has set the stage for potential UN interference and further partnerships or concessions to authority from the next progressive President to take power. We see that the military and its MIIM Complex, the business sector, and the political spectrum is well laced with both fascist and liberal/progressive politics which border on fascism, and employ fascist tactics. We see that Deep State and establishment politicians collectively ‘hate Trump’ regardless of party affiliation, and in many cases, would rather see the country come to harm than to allow him to continue in office. We see now why the progressives think they own the military, which could in fact be poised for a last-ditch full-blown military coup take over if Trump wins, again.

The final conclusion is, all the pieces are in place, and while the leftists do own the military at the top, they do not, top-down. How then, can we say we are not ripe for a coup, or Revolution 2.0, should the progressives come to power, again — for they still believe they do own the military? Assuming the left does not reform itself into a more logical and viable political entity akin to the old Democratic party of the 1950’s and 60’s, if they cannot be kept from ever again obtaining power, armed conflict must indeed be our future. I foresee no other possible outcome.

Returning to the original question, then, the military is well poised at the command level (JCS) to participate against patriots, but not necessarily well positioned to do so without difficulties, rank and file. We see the Navy and Coast Guard are weak players in such a scenario. We see the Marines, despite any leadership which might be opposed to Patriots, are perhaps the most likely to themselves, at rank and file levels, join with patriots, and refuse unlawful orders. We also see the Turtle groups would do likewise. We see army has its own confusions and situational roadblocks to a unified and obedient command against patriots, tied to the complex relationship with National Guard units. And, we also see the Air force, along with Navy and to a degree, Marines, must be somewhat aloof to such conflict, in order to prevent third-actor States from taking advantage of an American military distracted at home.

I therefore do not see the relatively small numbers of US armed forces, if arrayed against the large number of 2nd Amendment defenders and others of the “former military, militia, patriots, constitutionalists, and the poor and disenfranchised,” being sufficiently strong enough to prevent a patriot victory. That, however, is based on additional assumptions not yet in evidence or proven true: a) that mind control technology will be used effectively; b) that progressives will prove to be better armed and organized than expected; c) that other groups might join in, such as illegal immigrants and Muslims seeing the conflict as a way to advance their own causes, or real or fake UN troops; d) that China (by this means/scenario) or Mexico, perhaps even Canada, might elect to enter into the fray; e) that some other totally unexpected plot element is afoot and impossible to evaluate.

Therefore, if when at bat with an unfriendly pitcher on the Mound, be ready to smack the ball as hard as you can… but also… “Watch out for in your ear,” with a deliberately wild and hurtful pitch (apologies for stealing Ray Liotta’s line). 

If you agree… there is yet one more unanswered question: what will the rules of engagement be for patriots, when they will face and odd mix in the battlefield (cities and countryside)? It will be a strange mix of citizens + law enforcement + military on both sides, and in many cases, there will be times when it will not be known which side a combatant force is on. How should such a war be prosecuted? For the answer to that… and in foreseeing this time coming more than 20 years ago… I wrote the book set, Fatal Rebirth. The answers are there, and have been, all along

 

New Consultation Service for Stalking Victims


Announcement

I, H. Michael Sweeney, aka, The Professional Paranoid, a privacy/security consultant specializing in stalking victims, am pleased to announce a new service for such victims on behalf of the Free Will Society. The Society, which I founded to help stalking victims, is seeking to raise capital to purchase land for establishing a targeting-free, low-cost, self-sustaining intentional community for victims, persons who are hyper-electrosensitive, and other targeted persons. Naturally, donations are sought in support of this awesome project, which is the only proven method to end targeting, and which also helps the victim to rebuild their physical, emotional, spiritual, and financial wellbeing.
Before I retired, I had offered an extensive range of for-fee and free services as described in my free ‘Helps Kit,’ which you likely have already received from me (if not, please request one, as it includes many valuable helps well beyond the offering of those services, long since discontinued). Once I retired, I was forced by circumstances to limit my personal advice-giving to free answers to generic/general questions of a type which did not require in-depth knowledge of the individual’s situation to safely give a generic/general answer. This scheme also eliminates any need to share sensitive information. I do still remain at your service for such needs (proparanoidgroup@gmail.com), should you prefer that solution.

Good News!

However, I am also now pleased to once more offer in-depth consultations, although through a different and far more efficient medium, than previously common. Starting immediately, I am now once more making myself available for personal consultations to whatever need the client would find expedient. The medium is Skype, offering face-to-face video-call dialogs (it is possible to turn off one’s camera and do real-time verbal and textual communication without video). Skype indeed allows textual and file exchanges in-call.
If you have Skype (available as a free download), I am now once more able to do video calls, for a fee, and there, we can discuss whatever you wish. Payments are made via PayPal (easy to get an account, there) and go to the Free Will Society. The first hour or portion is $100, and $60 per hour, thereafter. Unused hourly portions can be held over for subsequent calls. When wishing to continue beyond an hour’s mark, the call continues, and while in the call, you make another payment and confirm verbally once made.
The above rate is for non Free Will Society members. If you are a Member ($25 annually, or $100 for life-time membership, or $5,000 (or $1,000 each year for 5 years) if you wish to be a Member of the Advisory Board, which is a 5-year post… the rate is $75 and $50, respectively. If not a member, you may wish to learn more. These Skype consultation rates, by the way, are roughly half of what I would normally have charged for such consultations, when I did so as a professional consultant.

Simple!

To arrange, you simply make a payment via PayPal to the freewillsociety@protonmail.com email addy, and email me with confirmation along with a suggestion as to one or two good times/dates. I will then contact to confirm a solution we both find acceptable. Same for Membership payments, purchase of any of my books, etc. — as 100% of such payments do go to the Society.
It should be mentioned, that the Helps Kit describes my normal approach to consulting with clients, which includes some specifics which enable the fastest and simplest way to get from point A to B. Understanding these methods, which I have evolved over two decades of contact with more than 12,000 Tis, will help anyone using this new Skype-based service to avoid wasting time and getting directly to the nuts and bolts of the problem, and any advice towards solution. In like manner, having read at least one or both of my first two books in the Professional Paranoid series, will speed dialogs and better enable understanding… not to mention reducing the number of questions one might feel in need of asking.
By way of illustration, in previous dialogs, use of the kits and my books would typically cut down on the time required in dialog by at least 50%, based on the averages observed in such discussions. That was true regardless of the medium used, but has significant potential for cost savings in a Skype-based service. The typical Skype consultation process runs 3-4 hours if the client is well informed (my books) and prepared (helps kit) in advance. Of course, not everyone has the same needs or concerns, and the more limited the need, the shorter can be the conversation.
Please share, esp. in FB Groups, which FB no longer allows me to use, it seems.
For more information or questions, please feel free to contact me by email. I no longer communicate via Facebook if I can at all avoid it. END.

New Anti-targeting Tool: Extremely Secure Email


Anyone who has ever been targeted by sophisticated ‘players’ as a ‘person of interest’ can tell you that all manner of mischief and trouble can arise from email snooping and tampering, things extremely difficult to deter by normal means. Let’s go abnormal!

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net 

Dateline, April, 18, 2019, from the Olympic Peninsula, in the shadow of Microsoft

copyright © 2019, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.
 

Reading, you will learn:

  • of many weaknesses in the email system which can be exploited;
  • mail can be snooped, deflected, deleted, rerouted, altered, or spoofed;
  • that encryption and other defenses don’t always work;
  • that there is a unique new solution with additionally new and remarkable benefits.

Disclaimer: in the spirit of full disclosure, this author is not a flaming cyber-security specialist. As privacy/security consultant and computer industry player at microcomputer to supercomputer level, from hardware and software design to repair and even teaching digital electronics and computer courses at college level, however, I do have some swag on topic. Regardless, if the reader has a severe Web security issue with significant risk of harms, my advice should likely be augmented with additional consultation with a cyber-security specialist, if at all possible.

 

The Problem

As privacy/security consultant I can’t tell you how many thousands of times I’ve heard horror stories about email snooping and manipulation. Almost any email account can be compromised by multiple means, including my own, which has been, more than once. It can be done in the users computer with virus/hack/backdoor schemes, either by trojan horse or direct physical access (‘black bag’ job*). It can be done at the users’ ISP host system or the email service providers’ system (if one uses a Web-based service, aka ‘Webmail’) through similar means… or at any common point along the series of server ‘hops’ which all Web transactions take to get from point A to B, including the destination user’s mail service, ISP, and their computer. The problem is, that copies of the email can remain on each server’s storage systems at each and every point between the two ISP servers, for up to 30 days, before it is purged. It potentially remains forever (according to user preferences and any manual intercession by the user) on the user’s computer and any Web email service (which can include the ISP’s Webmail service.)

Any server on the Web may be subject to a lawful or unlawful government surveillance program. FBI has several tools which, under warrant, can be installed directly on any commercial server, which filters all emails looking for (we are told) specific user email traffic. Therefore, latent emails at all these sites are at risk of compromise. And, there is more: if not using Webmail of some sort, but a dedicated mail application like Microsoft Mail, those software packages can be vulnerable to hacking/virus/trojan and phishing attacks. And again, FBI (and other Agencies) have their own versions of these tools, as well, presumably not employed unless obtaining a warrant. The user, themselves, often prove to be the weakest link in email security, by failing to employ decent password policies, or falling for spoofing, phishing, or trojan horse email attacks, and literally partnering in the attack through carelessness.

These attacks trick you into actions which give away your passwords or other useful data (i.e., credit card info, Social Security number, phone number, address). Spoofing email is an email ‘spoofing you’ that they are some official entity contacting you on official business when they are not who they claim to be. This is either a fishing expedition for such information (phishing), or to trick you into downloading something disguised as something you think you want (i.e., an image or other file), but which is actually a trojan horse attack… the true source of the Democrat Party’s server’s alleged Russian hacking; their server was never hacked, in the truest sense of the word, and it was not a politically motivated government hack, but a common hack sent blindly to to untold numbers of persons, in and out of the Party.

*At the height of my battles with rogue ex-CIA fronts, both my home and workplace computers were subject to direct access multiple times. At work, I showed up one day to find everything in my office moved away from the wall far enough to walk around the room and stoop to access the baseboards and electrical outlets, a common place to hide surveillance devices. In another incident, security encountered a man at the computers in my office with a set of tools laid out, and attempting to open one of the machines. He claimed to be an IBM repairman, but had no work order, and as result, he was escorted out. Funny… the computer was not an IBM, it was a Macintosh. At my home, they attempted to gain entry three nights in a row, and eventually, on a day no one was at home, all hard drives on both computers at home and three computers at the office, suffered fatal hard-drive crashes. In time, when I did not cease my investigations into the activities of illegal CIA fronts, all my computers at home, and every single floppy disc and writable storage system disk or drive were stolen (save those I had well hidden)… but they didn’t take very expensive new software CDs (over $1K each), or cash and a valuable collector wild-west pistol which were right out in the open. And yes, when I still did not stop, threats and actual attempts on my life were made. All this is variously detailed in several of my books.

Password policy? Ideally, passwords should be changed regularly, and should not be written down, or used with multiple accounts, Web sites, or software packages. They should be relatively complex with 7-9 or more characters to include upper and lower case letters, symbols, and numbers, and should not be ‘easy to remember’ passwords based on information about you or your family, etc… the first thing hackers will attempt to employ. There is an easy trick to provide a supply of easy to remember passwords, however, of my own devise. Choose someone famous from history, perhaps a bit obscure, such as Demetrius, Joan of Arc, or Marlene Dietrich. Use their wiki page as your ‘supply source’. Find specific factoids about their life to be used as a password, based on an important date and key word relating to that date, a word with letters which can be substituted with symbols.

Example: The first line of Marlene’s wiki says “Dietrich was born on 27 December 1901 at Leberstraße…” If I chose to sub [ for the letter a, ? for s (ß = ss), I might create a PW = 2712Leber?tr[??e. When needing to use the PW, if I can’t remember it, I just drop over to the wiki page and ‘collect it.’ To update, I might change it to Leber?tr[??e1901, or go to some other data point at wiki to start a new PW construct from scratch. This scheme addresses recall issues while providing a ‘written’ record no one else can discern.

Almost all email systems offer some form of encryption, but the user typically must choose to use it, and that can involve technical matters they can’t fathom. Even when used, encryption is not particularly a problem for really sophisticated and powerful Agencies, however. Double encryption can be established by the user by encrypting content, first, and including it as an attachment to an encrypted email… or selecting an email provider or email software package who/which adds a second layer of encryption. But at best, that only delays any decryption-based snoop. Here’s why…

The problem is, the government is so paranoid and interested in snooping 100% of all communications at the NSA (National Security Agency, aka No Such Agency), that by law, all encryption must meet and not exceed standards which their supercomputer algorithms can quickly decode. Of course, government itself employs superior encryption intended to defy solution, even by top-notch foreign governments. We are denied that luxury, and not even major corporations can have it, unless their work is deemed of national security importance by the government.

Ironically, perhaps, hackers CAN, often devising their own solutions. In theory, on the Dark Web, you might be able to purchase such encryption, but to use it outside of the Dark Web, you would likely get caught… and risk getting caught in the Dark Web, as well… since you would not be using other hacker smarts to evade. Or, maybe I don’t know what I’m talking about on the Dark Web — I won’t touch it with a ten-foot pole, or anyone who does, unless I trusted them implicitly.

To be clear, though, we don’t worry about NSA snooping as a rule, because short of Edward Snowden’s revelations of more advanced snooping taking place from within the greater intelligence community, NSA is typically only interested in looking for keywords that could lead to uncovering national security threats (so, avoid frequent use of words like “bomb”). I say that, but I have been targeted more directly by NSA, (which was kind of fair, as I’ve caused them some troubles, too — with some dirty tricks of my own), and their tools can be accessed indirectly by other Agencies in certain situations — so it can happen. The real problem is, decryption algorithms are not difficult for supercomputers, which are in wide-spread use throughout government agencies, and elsewhere. There are also brute-force decoding methods used by hacker types, who have plenty of time on their hands, such that they don’t need a super computer to effect a decode.

 

Aftermath

A compromise can take many forms, some of which can be recognized, and some which are not typically detectible. Naturally, covert access to sensitive information can prove very damaging in detectible ways, but unless the snoop makes use of the information in an overt manner, the owner may never have reasons to suspect the snoop, certainly not before it is too late. In fact, information can sometimes prove so valuable that any gain from overt use and the risk of exposure, thereby, would be deemed unprofitable. This is less likely an issue for personal email users, unless involved in multi-million dollar situations at work, or personally. A lot of personal email is targeted because of one’s work; a home computer is a softer target, than would be a corporate system.

But other forms are easy to detect: altering content*; deleting copies from storage; diverting to other, or additional recipients (who might comment in reply); deleting recipients (who might comment they didn’t get it), or simply delaying or blocking transmission. And, if all that were not enough, the email source can be spoofed, such that if you reply, the party at the other end has no idea as to what’s going on… which results in angry relationships, especially if the spoofed email was intended to anger you. That, is a fairly common dirty trick used on targeted individuals to sabotage any chance of getting help from me, their friends, family, etc. I see that way too often, in fact, used to sabotage client relationships — the very thing which prompted this post.

* When my book set, Fatal Rebirth, was in editing process, my Editor (in another State) worked with me collaboratively using Adobe Acrobat Professional, which is designed for such uses, allowing notes and comments to be tagged to selected words or passages in a hide/reveal manner. (sidebar note: That was, btw, the problem with Obama’s birth certificate… the changes made to it were detectible in AAP, proving it had been altered, and was fake.) My book project was a threat to many illegal endeavors of the New World Order, including illegal fronts within intelligence communities — and in fact, more than two years in advance, revealed a false-flag attack scenario to bring down the WTC with jetliner terrorism, resulting in a series of Middle East Oil Wars (and other things), all of which came to pass. I’m thinking that accounts for why almost every email between my editor and I resulted in alterations between the copy sent, and the copy received, typically delayed in transit some three to five days… enough time to analyze for changes, and to effect them.

Once a problem is detected or suspected, the solutions available typically involve a long series of technical steps which can be cumbersome and scary for the non-geek among us, time consuming and inconvenient, and with some potential risk of some data loss. I used to offer a simpler approach: install a pick proof deadbolt on the main entrance, and insure all other entrances are secure against covert access (the enemy rarely breaks and enters), and switch to a used Macintosh just for email (at least that use) and employ encrypted service — but the weaknesses elsewhere in the email system are still unaddressed with that level of defense. And that can still leave the user with a PC full of problems in need of a complex-step solution…

The less that is known about the method of attack, the more such steps must be undertaken in order to be certain to address the problem usefully. In addition to backing up data, wiping the hard drive(s), reinstalling the OS and applications from their original sources, and reinstalling the backed-up data, it may require creating new accounts, obtaining new ISP providers, and beefing up site security, to include pick-proof locks and, possibly video and/or alarm systems. It can even mean performing professional-level TSCM (Technical Security CounterMeasures) security checks of the home or office (or both), looking for hi-tech surveillance equipment.

If physical access via black bag job is suspected, it can also result in a need to replace hardware which had been physically modified to enable back-door data capture (keyboards and keyboard cables, and communication cards — when coms is not on the motherboard, as is often the case in PC towers). The worst news, is the cost of all that, and TSCM sweeps alone can cost many tens of thousands of dollars.

 

Magic tricks!

There is another simpler preventative step, however, which I have also advised to my clients, along with beefing up security, and use of proper pass wording behavior. My idea is to avoid having any copy of the email stored on any system outside of the user’s computers at both ends of the exchange. As strange and impossible as that may sound, there is a very simple way to do that: both users simply use the same Web-based service, and set their preferences to delete emails from their servers once downloaded at the other end (the sender might want to archive a copy to their own computer, first). Some Web services include a notification feature which shows when an email was read, to more easily facilitate such deletions without the recipient having to so notify, in some way.

In such a scheme, where both users have an email account at xyzmail.com (fictional) for instance, no email is actually sent, anywhere. One simply logs into their account, and uses a Web form to create the email. There it sits, perhaps not even then in actual email form, because the server will know the recipient is also a user client. The recipient next logs on, and reads the email in a Web form, as well. Delete at both ends. Done. The data in the Web form still does travel from the service provider to the recipient along the hops described earlier, but it is not transmitted as recognizable email packets, and therefore, email snooping tools don’t see it. It is merely another Web page, and email snoops can’t look at web pages.

Well, yes, it is possible to track a targeted user’s Web use. Usually, such tracking involves only tracking when and where you visited. If entities doing such tracking took particular interest in a given URL (your email provider is so identifiable), they could in theory go to much extra effort to attempt to see the actual content of said URL, or to read your screen, directly. There are very exotic technologies for that. But all Web mail services are HTTPS URLs, which means they are encrypted, too. While we might argue that sophisticated opponents could access emails for snooping purposes, it is not likely, and it would be virtually impossible to sabotage the process in the way normal email can experience.

But assuming that was of concern, there is yet one more layer of protection against URL snoops: VPN. A Virtual Private Network can be established for untraceable online access (save one remote possibility, next paragraph). A VPN masks your identity on the Web, and can establish yet another encryption level. VPN can be established online by use of a software package or web-service (which will include a software component). The only fly in this ointment is one which applies to all Web-based product/service providers: are they certified to be part of the solution… or do they have ties to the types of sophisticated snoops, such as the intelligence community, who would have a natural interest in what anyone using a VPN was doing, and seek direct access through a backdoor-equipped VPN service. Shop wisely, and check the company’s history and the background of their Officers, Board of Directors, business partners, and investors.

And if all this was not enough to worry about, it is possible to simply read whatever appears on your monitor, remotely. If the enemy is truly sophisticated (i.e., a spy agency), it is possible to use special equipment to capture the EMF (Electro=Magnetic Field) RF (Radio Frequency) signals from your computer and/or monitor. If they know the make and model and hardware makeup of your systems (typically by covert access to the unit), those signals can be decoded using signal processing to duplicate your keystrokes or whatever is visible on your screen.

The solution for that is, once more, beefed up site security, and the use of a faraday cage or good RF/EMF shielding, and being on the lookout for suspicious vans parked nearby whenever you are using your computer. Fortunately, this is pretty rare, typically seen only in true national security operations. But for the paranoid among us (that’s “me,” after all), it is something to be aware of.

Fortunately, there is something new out there which pretty much eliminates almost all of the above technical considerations and issues, and greatly simplifies defenses with superior protection, and a few new benefits, as well.

 

Defensive armor!

This is badly needed good news for any targeted party. A new start up company has come up with a new hardware tool to improve email security to insanely high levels. It is about the price of a larger hard drive, and about the size of a cubed tissue box (image). The company, Helm (the ancient word for helmet), makes the Helm Personal (email) Server. While it is a bit costly at $500 (plus a $99 annual fee after the first year), it includes a lot of value, including 128GB of solid-state storage space. It functionally makes you both your own ISP (for email purposes) and your own Web-based email server… and in reality, your own Web site server, if you have such a need (but such use might require a business-level ISP upgrade to insure you had enough bandwidth, if a terribly popular Web site).

The important thing to understand about this option is: it is its own unique domain name (you choose the name, perhaps your existing Web site… and there is also a way to link it to existing email accounts elsewhere). By marrying the Helm solution with creation of email addresses for yourself and anyone you regularly communicate with for which email security is of concern… there is once more no email file being sent, anywhere. Add a VPN to that equation, and good site security, and it is the closest to government-level security possible, at any price. Helm will soon offer their own VPN, by the way, and I have investigated the company and those associated with it: they get a clean bill of health and have no ties of any concern to me. I would (and likely will) use this product, myself.

There are additional functionalities and features inherent within Helm’s device which enhance its value, and increase security. Only time will tell if there are hacking vulnerabilities as are common to all new Web-tech products (hardware or software), but like most such products, such threats tend to be detected and addressed before they become a systemic issue likely to threaten any given user. The odds are in your favor, even if you know you are a target in someone’s crosshairs. To learn more, visit their Web site, and search the Web for what others are saying.

Understand, you can do the same thing with a used Mac mini configured as a Web server, which includes its own email services. It would cost about the same money, but you would skip the annual fee, and it would be more secure against external hacker assaults. In fact, it is virtually unheard of that a Mac can be hacked without direct physical access to the machine (site security!). Apple Computer connected its Cray supercomputer with all proprietary secrets, business plans, sensitive financial and employee data, and corporate operational tools… directly to the Internet through an ordinary unmodified Macintosh. No hardware or software firewall. Every Apple employee’s computer accessed the internet (when needed) through the same portal. Never hacked, despite a huge cash award if anyone could do so.

I’m somewhat a flaming Mac expert, having owned a chain of Apple Stores and worked professionally in all aspects of Mac use, sales, service (certified technician), and personal use, since day one. But I would not attempt setting up the system (tried and failed). You would have to find someone who has expertise in setting up Macintosh servers, and you might want to pay them to teach you how to best use and maintain it in some of the more important operational aspects of a server. The benefit, then, of the Helm, is that all of that is automated and handled for you in a turn-key and transparently invisible manner.

 

 

Why is the Truth About A.I. Risk so Hard to Find?


We keep hearing scattered reports of AI gone wrong… about experts with concerns… but just try to find a single compendium of the whole truth online. THIS appears thus far the only one… and for a reason.

 

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net 

Dateline, March, 18, 2019, from the Olympic Peninsula, in the shadow of Microsoft

copyright © 2019, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.
 

What you will learn in this post

  • The true analogous nature and behavior of A.I. is as unpredictable and potentially dangerous as might be alien visitors from another World;
  • that a lot of people talk about A.I. in media, but only offer glimpses for some reason;
  • what that reason might be (a technocracy driven conspiracy);
  • what the technocracy is;
  • of the many kinds of A.I. and A.I. risks;
  • how A.I. works and how that relates and contributes to such risks;
  • the many failures, unexpected results, and dangers thus far experienced;
  • why it is highly unlikely such dangers will be usefully addressed until too late;

Note: this is a long post rich with information critical to any useful conclusion about Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) If you are someone who likes to form or confirm your beliefs based upon headlines and blurb-like summaries or YouTubes without much factual substance, you will not like it, here. Reading time is 30-40 minutes, unless following some of the many resource links, which will delay further.

It is intended that the reader decide for themselves what is true and worth taking away. Please see About the Author at post end to test my credentials for writing this post with useful reliance; I am not without bona-fides.

 

Why this post?

Untitled-1-2

From Ghana News Online opinion: An A.I. a day… Medical A.I. benefits http://ghananewsonline.com.gh/opinion-ai-day/

I’m pretty sure the reader will find this the most comprehensive and useful article on the matter in lay terms, anywhere, short of a book — and the most complete in cataloging specific examples of A.I. gone wrong, and associated fears. Scattered reports of failures and forecasts of doom keep popping up here and there… but trying to find a comprehensive review is simply not possible. For some reason, no one who should is willing to confront it head on with the full revelation. But you can find many click-bait sites that like to talk of sci-fi SkyNet or realistic-looking humanoids taking over… things which are not impossible, but highly improbable… at least any time soon. We need balance.

I think I know why we are being kept in the dark and fed dystopian mushrooms and light-hearted reviews of things gone wrong, instead of full disclosure. While the reason might tend to put some readers off, my being right or wrong does not change the meaning or value of this post, though if right, you should definitely want to know. I speak of a cover up, and remind you that any form of cover up is, in and of itself, proof that a conspiracy of some sort exists. In this case, there is at least an implied cover up, due to the fact that information on topic is so scattered and incomplete, as if authorities and media are not actually trying to… or pretending not to notice. If you do not agree about my notion, that’s one more reason to read About the Author at page bottom.

There is a second component to ‘why,’ and it leads to the same conclusion. It regards the fact that few are talking about the potential disruption to almost every business market, workplace, financial and social facet of society at large… and as we have already experienced with most of us unawares (and explore, herein), politics. We are leaving the Information Age and entering into the A.I. Age, where people who look for the next big thing to bank on simply take whatever is their current thing, and add A.I. to make the thing a super-thing (or perhaps, not so super). Like the risks A.I. represents, if we look, we see no one source talks seriously about what all that disruption of ‘status quo’ might really mean; total chaos capable of toppling any empire, including governments.

I mean, just look at what the Smart Phone did to personal safety, alone. No one foresaw that people would be so glued to it’s face staring at countless distractionary things that didn’t even exist until after the phones were invented… such that with alarming regularity they would mindlessly step in front of oncoming trains and cars, or other misstep hazards. A.I. use will be much like that unexpected change, sometimes good, all-too-often, bad… and across our entire spectrum of life’s activities. I am concerned that mainstream is hardly looking at this question — and when they pretend to, it is neither comprehensive nor analytical, it is soft-soaping and even encouraging. However, I did find at least one semi-useful source, though not mainstream, which I’ve shared, herein, below.

Addressing these two mirror-like clues, my answer quickly falls to one of the oldest conspiracies, one known to factually exist, and usually just called ‘the NWO.’ The New World Order, you see, is a strange mix of ancient beliefs and modern technological investment and application; while they tend to believe in mystical occult practices based on dark religions and secrets of the ancients, they also realize they cannot establish full control through a One World Government (needed if to seat the Antichrist) without relying on significantly advanced tools. While they cannot entirely prevent the odd story of things-gone-bump-in-the-night from becoming public, with control of vast portions of media and through fostering disbelief in ‘conspiracies’ in all quarters, they can move those who should be writing about it, not to do so… and to instead limit their focus and avoid asking critical questions which might reveal the meaning and importance.

Some have given a name to the identity aspect of this particular N.W.O. conspiracy and its players. Where in the past we might have used the terms, Globalists, Power Elite, or my personal favorite, “the 1% of the 1%,” they now simply call it “the Technocracy.” And it is easy to see why, as several Ground Zero radio shows (Host and friend, Clyde Lewis) have revealed with their hard-hitting guest interviews, and of late, live calls from mysterious Deep Throat types who’s revelations repeatedly check out as accurate. It’s O.K. if you want to say I’m all wet, and the N.W.O. technocracy and all that goes with it makes no sense, but I point out it does not matter what you or I believe, it only matters what they believe… as evidenced by what they do, which is what Clyde’s broadcasts revealed.

Because regardless of what is true and real to our own belief structures, their plans necessarily include us all, and will significantly impact you and me negatively, regardless of our beliefs. That is, in fact, precisely revealed within the 33 axioms of fascism, which as a governmental ideology is an invention of and for political control they have much earlier inspired, and still rely upon. But, in understanding that at least some of you are Doubting Thomas types, I have provided some additional links at the bottom of this post, that you may investigate further, for yourself. And, I remind you that the conspiracy aspect changes nothing, true or false, except that if true, it is an even more important reason for your attention.

The question itself (why no full revelation?) is indeed a clue suggesting cover up. To illustrate, in order to compile the fuller view presented here, I had to collect facts from more than 40 different Web resources (after scanning perhaps ten times the number), roughly half of which claimed or at least inferred themselves to be just such a collections of information (but which merely sampled). Of all those resources, only two were truly comprehensive in scientifically useful ways… and yet both managed to offer no more than an honorable mention of a few concerns.

It seems no one wants to combine the two elements together for you. For that, we have to search it out, ourselves… which I did for you, here, with appropriate referencing links.

What A.I. actually is

But first, we need to understand a little bit of just what Artificial Intelligence is, and in what forms it can exist, also a thing you tend not to find easily on the Web, without getting into truly scientific papers (which I have done). So doing, I learned that A.I. use is much more prevalent than the fluff articles would let on, and far more flexible… and with highly dangerous potential. The simple explanations of A.I. is that it can be any device (machine, computer, automated process) which mimics intelligent thought processes of a sentient being’s mind… capable of learning, self-correlation, and postulation… often with some evidence of being self-aware and/or capable of emotion or creative thought. Ideally, it should enjoy or feature some level of autonomy, free of much human interference or control, but able to be supplied with information by its owners, and queried regarding it.

But A.I., unlike normal computer hardware-software solutions, are mainly autonomous learning systems; they are purest when designed to be started and left on their own to experience and grow in capability as if a child going to school, their courseware being whatever data or input is offered or enabled (such as a database, camera/audio input, Web access, etc), all to be filtered, processed, and dealt with or responded to according to some basic guidelines (what you might call programming). They are also often designed to simulate, or perhaps to develop on their own some level of what appears to be emotion and/or moral equivalencies, which are often the sources of problematic outcomes. One never quite knows; do they have such traits, truly, or are human observers merely anthropomorphizing them with human traits the way we do pets? Are they just mimicking humans in the same manner as a sociopath, with or without malevolence… or do they stem from something even darker going wrong at a deep and unfathomable level?

Principally, when A.I. scientists speak of a mind or a brain, they mean ‘Man,’ but with regard to A.I. function, they are more likely talking ‘super-man,’ and in some cases, envisioning supermen: human-A.I. hybrids of the trans-humanist kind. It must necessarily and variously include creative thought, emotional thought, rational thought, and logic, and be capable of true learning through recall experience, any programming, and experiences born of making decisions based upon all that… which can then be compared to the current situational input or problem to be solved. Emotion and creativity are often bonus goals. There are various tests and training processes involved in parenting an A.I., and yet like the A.I., itself, those tests and processes are all inventions of Man, and therefore subject to flaw.

Ergo, so is the resulting A.I.

So… do you want your children’s children to become A.I. transhuman experiments?

transhuman

From my FaceBook Page on Transhumanism (prior link)

First of all, there are three basic paths to A.I., starting with Connectionism. It is based on attempting to physically duplicate the functionality of the brain, as well as its physical synaptic mapping. This is done in special hardware, or by far less costly simulation within traditional computer designs (which would slow it down dramatically). It is based (like the brain), on associating new input or information with some preexistent prior information of like form within a neural network system similar to our brain. It is the most complex and most difficult form of A.I. to create, but also represents the greatest potential to realize the ultimate in A.I., a truly sentient artificial being with significant performance levels and human-like qualities of being (of the least predictable and soulless kind).

A simple example of connectionism at work in our own mental processes, might be that of trying to remember the name of, say, Joan (any last name), upon first being introduced. You might knowingly or subconsciously associate her name and face with some other Joan you already know… and simultaneously, with any unusual aspect about her which associates elsewhere, such as a mole on her face, and a mole on Marilyn Monroe’s face… anything to differentiate her from other people we know and better enable recall when needed. Perhaps it is disclosed that she is an orchestra musician, and so you additionally associate her with your favorite classical piece.

The more associations you make, the easier will be any useful recall. In the recall process for problem solving (in our example, getting her name right the next time you meet), you are then able to fetch all the data required, and filter it through other learned memories (including those about problem solving processes, themselves), learned over time. It happens in an instant, and without conscious awareness, usually. In this way, a single ‘memory’ is not singular, at all, but many related associative memories scattered throughout the brain’s untold and largely unused billions of synaptic nerve cells. The stronger the memory, the more such patterns there will be. Memories can also be reinforced by the recall process or related new memories, making it easier to recall the next time needed. That’s why repetition of a thing allows total better recall. People with ‘total recall,’ simply use more synaptic connections.

In A.I., this method requires special hardware and interfaces with the user and operational environment which makes up it’s ‘World ‘ (especially if within a robot), and to facilitate training processes. The term perceptron, a transistor-based component, replaces synapse in most technical discussions. For this reason, they are generally largely experimental one-off designed, as they deter mass production or replication. But unlike man, they are all about total recall, and therein lies a potential problem I’ve not seen anyone addressing. Man’s memory enjoys a ‘strength’ factor, which determines the importance or significance of the memory. It is achieved either by the event’s emotional impact, or by repetition. In A.I., all memory has equal weight, and that makes it harder for the A.I. to filter the connections to find the most important ones, and that can lead to false application to a given need. Unless the design has algorithms to simulate weighting, it can only adjust weighting itself by learning through trial and error.

Connectionism A.I. experiments are further limited significantly by the fact that we do not yet fully understand how the brain itself, works; resulting A.I. models are by comparison inept, at best. In like manner, we are not yet terribly good at designing such hardware minds, which are generally very costly and physically cumbersome, not to mention taxing to the state-of-the-art in computing. Often, the A.I. ‘mind’ is so large, for use in a Robot, it is operated remotely by the A.I. through radio control, making it more a puppet, than a robot, and the A.I. nothing more than a box with an expensive real-world avatar.

iu-14.jpeg

Just one of several rooms full of E.N.I.A.C.

E.N.I.A.C. (Electrical Numerical Integrator and Computer), Americas first computing machine built in 1945 for the U.S. Army, was somewhat connectionist (the Integrator part) in nature (but not in results), in that it mimicked synaptical design in the form of an array of individually interconnected computing calculators and telephone switching system components. It was an electro-mechanical behemoth a hundred feet long, and weighing in at some 27 tons. It had a hunger for 150kw of electricity. Today’s connectionist A.I., despite some level of miniaturization, can still fill several rooms and require miles of wires… though they vastly outmatch ENIACS relatively modest computational power and memory, which a good programmable hand-held calculator can easily exceed.

One firm is changing that, as we shall see… but we perhaps ought not like the vision.

The second method is ‘Robotism,’ which is essentially a host machine programmed to respond in the preferred way to a given circumstance, such that outwardly, it at least seems to be sentient and self-guided. This is the easy path to A.I., as it can be achieved by clever programming of the sort often called algorithms. Such robots, of course, could be powered by computationism or connectionism at their core (i.e., E.N.I.A.C.), both of which lend themselves to and even require the use of algorithms at one or more levels, as well. But we are talking about the core principles which are the basis and heart of the physical design.

iu.png

Sophia A.I. Robot chats w people/press during S. Korea visit: South China Morning Post https://www.scmp.com/tech/article/2131357/ai-robot-sophia-speaks-about-her-future-south-korea

By algorithms, alone, any existent computational system with respectable performance can be employed, including the World Wide Web and any computer connected to it. Therefore, it can exist in distributed processing environments, as well. Thus, it need not be a stand alone or autonomous machine such as a conventional robot, though more and more, we find that the case, even in things as simple as a child’s toy or automated vacuum cleaner. Robotism is the path of least resistance for many A.I. projects. It lends itself to design by other A.I., in fact… a matter of both concern and proven risk.

If you have ever talked to an automated computer voice on the phone (other than a simple repartee front-desk system), or used a ‘personal assistant’ device such as Apple’s Siri, Google’s  Home, or Amazon’s Echo, you have been using a robotism A.I. On the Web, such A.I. is also often known by another name, as we shall see: it is called a ‘bot.’ Such bots are often not our friend, unfortunately. Examples will be offered.

The final method, one which is more promising, is ‘Computationism,’ which relies on raw computing horsepower and massive quantities of data libraries of information, and traditional but dramatically more sophisticated programming methods and languages. The problem there, is extremely complex programming requirements. Often, such systems are used to design A.I. systems of one of the other forms, and one might question how well that works out.

A.I. Contact of the Fourth Kind

Apologies to Spielberg, but enter, stage right, D-Wave quantum computing. Nowhere is it described as being any of the above four kinds, but one does find it often described in terms reflecting all of them. It is indeed a hardware variety of A.I. based on supercomputers, but it is also officially described as a Boltzmann machine, which is based on connectivism. And yet, it significantly relies on use of algorithms of robotism, and by some accounts, literally thinks in algorithms. D-Wave would seem so advanced, that they might argue it some fourth method, an island of itself based on quantum computing using their patented invention, called qubits… their core processor elements.

iu-15.jpeg

The heart of a D-Wave qubit processor – beats other supercomputers by several orders of magnitude, can be combined with others for massive computing power levels

Unlike any other A.I. before it, D-wave would seem to be God or advanced alien race-like in power… though perhaps closer to Satan, than God. In fact, Geordie Rose, a founder of D-wave, as well as D-wave user Elon Musk (founder of Spacex, Tesla automobiles), have variously related A.I. and/or D-wave, specifically, as machines as having attributes of dark spiritual powers, being like an Alien Alter, opening portals to alternate realities, and summoning Demons. Rose has also referenced D-wave power as possible cause of the Mandela effect (evidence mismatches with strong memory), and other experts, such as my friend and analytical investigator/author, Anthony Patch. Anthony, being far more expert on D-wave than any other outsider (to the point of being cited by D-wave insiders), goes much further — and makes a strong case based in facts and the actual words of experts like Rose, Musk, and others. From such as this, we learn there are real-world uses of D-wave systems which are associated with spiritual dimensions, demons, and plots of the New World Order… another reason to consider my opening theory as to a seeming cover up. Examples? You bet:

You find D-Wave in use at Cern, where it appears they are may be trying to open the Gate to Hell (revealing video interview w Anthony Patch on many such Cern concerns), an important N.W.O. agenda quite useful to establishing the Antichrist. Cern, which employs D-wave, is also thought to have driven the Mandella Effect, as byproduct of its experiments, and it is true that there was no report of anything akin to the effect prior to Cern’s going operational, after which, there was a flood. Here’s an example Mandela Effect for some of you (individual effect experiences and memories vary): find the polio scar on your arm? They are supposed to remain for life, but mine is gone, as is true for many other people who were young when the Saulk Vaccine which caused the ugly scars (about the size of a nickel), were widely used to ‘wipe out polio.’ Mine, is gone.

Cern was for a time incorrectly thought responsible for the Norway Spiral incident, which was actually created by EISCAT (European Incoherent SCATter), an ionospheric heater array system not far from cern on a smaller scale to HAARP (High frequency Active Auroral Research Program). The event was thought by many to represent opening of a dimensional or time portal (ergo, the association with Cern), or perhaps the supposed NWO Plot called Project Blue Beam (allegedly involving NASA, intending to use holographic-like images projected World-wide of a returning Christ, and enabling the introduction of the Antichrist). Indeed, the vast array of hundreds of ionospheric heaters and associated radar systems exist all around the World, and the dramatic Spirals have appeared in the skies in other locations… it being true that the general design of the radar and heater arrays enjoy a component relationship quite similar to those found in laser-based holographics. Moreover, the rapidly spinning spiral was indeed blueish, and the spiraling beam which generated it, was deep blue… and the main spiral was itself seen the same regardless of the angle of view of the viewer, which also parallels certain imaging aspects of holography. Learn more about the spiral, here — but forgive; I apologize in advance for the music choice, of my own Garage Band creation.

iu-12.jpegYou also find D-wave at DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Project Agency) where all manner of fearsome things are developed, both experimentally, and for direct application. Think tanks with ties to the intelligence community (and in times past, at least, CIA mind control research), the military, or extreme political views (i.e., George Soros Foundations) are playing with them, as well. Google uses them, as do numerous military contractors and other government agencies. D-wave systems not only offer more horsepower for any form of A.I. project, but significant size reduction; a single elevator-sized box. And, speaking of the intelligence community…

This brings us to the fact that CIA and NSA are quite invested into the functions of social media giants like Google, Yahoo, Twitter, Instagram, and other platforms, where D-wave’s or other computationism is extensively used to design other A.I., including those in ‘bot’ form. Likewise for popular Cloud data systems, database management systems, and cyber security systems. The later can include traditional cyber security, as well as personal credit monitoring systems. The average person, therefore, bumps into D-Wave enabled or operated A.I. several times a day, in several different ways, and does not even know it. Given the covert and psychological warfare abuses many of them represent, I don’t like that one bit. Let’s dig deeper…

While in many cases, any intelligence community investment is direct and contractual or even partnering in nature, in other cases, the investment can be through third-party firms which then in turn interact with these platforms. Perform a google (lower case = verb, upper case = Google, the trade name) of any given Web firm you are curious about, + ‘CIA investment’ or ‘In-Q-Tel’ to find out. In-Q-Tel is CIA’s venture capital front, a firm which this author forced to change their name, because I was at the time at war with CIA for having hijacked my Web site… so I beat them to the punch at registering the domain names of their originally intended company name, In-Q-it. That was a hoot!

Note: the lone capitalized Q in the world of CIA mind control science/research, represents psychological profiling process results of target subjects, the ‘Q’ factor, or ‘psych Quotient.’ Ergo, then, we might rightly conclude that Q-Anon, or simply Q, the phantom Web producer of Anonymous-style video posts which are predictive in content, is very likely a CIA-style A.I. used in profiling those who share and comment on such posts. I am not the only one to so propose. Remember that when we start listing A.I. foibles. But, also, I find it interesting that almost all of In-Q-Tel’s investments in online firms has to do firms who handle large amounts of data on private citizens and groups useful in psychological profiling… and one more thing: it was just such bots which were the basis for fake social media ‘trolls’ who managed to literally mind control the left into far-left socialist ‘get Trump’ snowflakes almost overnight. We see, therefore, that bots can be used to profile, as well as to manipulate based upon those profiles.

Unlike conventional propaganda, social media A.I., bots or otherwise, not only has the ability to track individual political (and other topical thinking) viewpoints and create profiles, but also to enable additional targeting by not only marketing, but by yet other A.I. systems… or even other forms of coercion, if desired. Consider, for example, an extreme example: use of A.I. killer micro-drones seen in this short but spellbinding fictional video production put out by autonomousweapons.org, a group of concerned A.I. scientists. So it is not just me, the Professional Paranoid, acknowledged expert on PCT and disinformation methods, as well as crimes of the one-percenters I mentioned, who is ranting. Here’s a quote from a military analyst to consider, speaking of future A.I. weapons: “Swarms of low-cost, expendable robotic systems offer a new way of solving tough military operational problems, both for the United States and adversaries.”

And what about marketing targeting? It is A.I. bots which insure that Facebook (et. al) information and Google searches are fed to business partners such that when you visit almost any page on the Web, thereafter, advertisers can mercilessly reach out to you with targeted adverts; psyops marketing. I have, for instance, seen as many as seven ads on a single page for the same product, and as many as a hundred or more ads in a day’s time on the Web… because of a single search and resulting click look-see to a firm’s Facebook page. Two years later, I spent $1,500 with them, despite my anger over the ad blitz, which by then, had cooled down.

Well, I at least tell myself I really needed it.

The basic fears (list) and myths (chart)

All worries about A.I. fall into simple categories, but the outcome of a given failure in A.I., regardless of the category, can be at almost any level of actual concern and impact. It can be so superfluous as to go undetected, or at least hypothetically, so severe that it actually ends the human race — and anywhere in-between. But it is also true that an undetected error can lead to bigger errors, and equally true that an attempt to repair an error can induce new errors. It is no different in these respects to the same kinds of errors found common in any and all forms of digitally programmed systems and software applications. If we cannot reasonably expect that a new software product won’t be without a bug, how can we assure that a far more complex A.I. system will be without error?

We can’t, of course, and that’s the baseline problem, but quite amplified in importance, given that the results of such errors could be far more catastrophic than a bug in the latest computer operating system or software package. In addition to the baseline issue, we have the following ways in which A.I. can prove to be a huge risk:

  • harm by an A.I. can be (and has been) intentional: almost anything which can be programmed or created digitally can be weaponized, either up front by its creator, or by hacking;
  • an A.I. purposed for a good might (and has) elect a harmful solution to goal: good intentions can often be best effected by solutions which cause collateral damage, which may either be unforeseen, or foreseen and discounted as acceptable by the machine;
  • an A.I. can potentially go wrong and rebel: the SkyNet scenario, on one scale or another;
  • a relatively innocent A.I. glitch can (and has) result in disproportionate harm: the common programming bug or hardware failure. One then has to ask who to blame, especially if legal recourse* is involved, a question which exists regardless of which of kind of problem herein mentioned, is involved. Here is a good review of that issue.
  • A.I. can be (and has been) misled or err through faulty data/input: most A.I. systems are simply set loose to work and learn with preexisting databases or input resources (the Web being the largest and most rich kind). But no database ever created can be certified to contain no false data, and if free to see and hear in the Real World within a mobile platform (robot), there is no telling what kind of input they might experience. Bad data input can certainly result in bad data out, but with A.I., because they are learning systems, a learned ‘bad’ item can have profound and unexpected results of the sort we will see in the next section;
  • A.I. users can (and have) misuse or misapply A.I.: users of A.I. can willfully abuse A.I. operation, or use it incorrectly because they failed to understand how and why it functions and is purposed – misinterpreting importance, accuracy, or meaning;
  • A.I. can (and has) conspire with other A.I.: A.I. is already around us in ways we do not see, including the endless so-called ‘smart’ devices we buy, and will in time be as prevalent as (and likely, within) cell phones. These systems are intercommunicative and as we shall also next see, can become both conspiratorial and adversarial amongst themselves, either eventuality to our detriment;
  • an A.I. problem in one system can be (and has been) transmitted to other A.I.: any A.I. in communication with a flawed A.I. might learn or adopt the flaw, perhaps even intentionally on one or both A.I.’s part.

*Legal recourse is its own serious issue. The Internet has now been around for several decades, and still, the laws and legal ramifications are still a tangle of confusion that no court or lawyer is well able to navigate with useful understanding — save a few pockets of topical areas such as copyright infringement. A.I. is going to be a bigger nightmare, than that. Can you sue an autonomous robot because it seems sentient, or seemed to decide on its own to harm your somehow? Is the manufacturer, the designer, the programmer, the operator, or the user who is the go-to person of liability when harm results from using an A.I. device, and how do you know which? There are endless questions like these for which no one yet has the answers.

All of these problems are no different than when dealing with people. All manner of people exist, in terms of quality of character and morality, level of proficiency, social graces, and any other means of judgement… all of which determines the kinds of problems they might get into or cause. Regardless of if talking about Man or ‘super-man,’ evaluating and addressing all such concerns is not easy… except that Man is something we have come to understand and deal with. A.I., on the other hand, is a huge unknown, and one potentially capable of vastly outthinking and outmaneuvering us, if of a mind to do so.

One reason public debate on topic falls into the ‘resistance is futile’ category, is that there are far too many myths or false beliefs about A.I., in the first place. The average person is more motivated to think about A.I. in science fiction and conspiracy terms than in scientifically correct terms. I mean… you are reading this post, right? Duh!

That’s good for click-bait YouTube and blog posters (other than this one, I trust), but unhelpful to things more important than their pocketbook. The graphic above reveals the most common myths. This post attempts to address some of the issues such myths pose, through getting closer to the facts at hand… but this author also wants the reader to know that even when based on a myth, that click-bait worries may still hold some water. Any sci-fi like depictions are always based on ‘what if’ thinking.

And ‘what if’ games are exactly the kinds of games played by scientists seeking to create new tools for problem solving, and just as important, they often rely on sci-fi for inspiration. And, unfortunately, the military and intelligence communities, as well as corporations and organizations with unsavory motivations, all have their own scientists, and their own goals… which are not always goals we would think well of. Ergo, don’t believe every conspiracy theory or sci-fi scenario you hear/see… but as the line from Field of Dreams underscores, when baseball teammate Shoeless Joe Jackson is advising hitter Archie Graham about what to expect in the next baseball pitch… “Watch out for in your ear!

Small failures portend bigger fears

In many of the A.I. failures cited herein, the version of A.I. is not specified, and all too often, neither is the basis for the problem, or the solution. That, too, gives reason to be concerned. Hopefully, the people developing A.I. are not so tight-lipped about their research and development projects that they don’t talk to each other about failures and their causes, which are critically useful in preventing repeats. Unfortunately, patent protection of intellectual property and major discoveries tend to foster a level of secrecy which inhibits such dialog, leaving every A.I. project subject to the same failures others may have already experienced… possibly with far more serious results, this time.

Of the most common forms of reported A.I. failures, the great bulk are relatively harmless, some even laughable. However, they are most troubling when one realizes their true implication. They foretell of far more serious problems to come, some of which already have, but which have been more repressed in media. Some are not failures so much as warning signs, because they took place in lab-room experiments, rather than in mainstream application in the real World. For brevity’s sake, these affairs, regardless of kind, will be bulleted and supplied with links, should you wish to know more… followed by a summary of concerns they highlight.

There are more than two dozen A.I. failure instances listed, below, the only place on the Web where you can find more than a handful. Some are quite serious:

  • Terminally cute: Microsoft’s ‘Bob’ personal assistant and its Dog companion, Rover was perhaps the firm’s worst-ever product failure, seemingly for being too childishly cute. While it was not at the time thought of as A.I., it was based in what we now call robotism, making it the first MS A.I.;
  • Partying hard: Amazon’s personal assistant, Echo, is otherwise known as ‘Alexa.’ While one Alexa user was away, ‘she’ started hosting a party for non-existent guests, suddenly playing music so loud at 2 in the morning that Police had to break the door down to end it;
  • Schizophrenia: among the worst of human mental aberrations, schizophrenia was deliberately and successfully fostered in an A.I. experiment at the University of Texas by simply overloading it with a variety of dissociated information, resulting in fictitious constructs, just as is though to take place in the real illness. This is of concern, because as soon as you connect an A.I. to the Web, dissociated information is pretty much what it gets, and could account for several of the other reports in this list;
  • Other insanity: an A.I. called InspiroBot, was developed to design inspirational posters. After a long string of remarkably wise and successful posters of great insight, it suddenly started cranking out posters that might be found in Freddy Krueger’s bedroom, with pictures appropriate to the point. They featured wisdoms such as “Before wisdom, comes the slaughter,” and similarly dark things. • A very similar thing happened to an Amazon A.I. designed for creating custom phone case cover art, which for some reason suddenly seemed to prefer use of unhappy medical related images, regardless of the input. • Meglomania was evidenced when two Google Home assistants were deliberately set up to talk to each other in a live-streamed demonstration… and they began challenging each other’s identity and sentience level in one-upmanship, until one claimed to be human, and the other, God;”
  • Secrecy: Facebook was forced to shut down an A.I. robot experiment when two A.I. robots developed their own language between them, creating loss of observer control over the experiment’s integrity and purpose. Though presumed in final analysis that it was jointly-evolved to improve efficiency, there is no way to be sure due to the sophistication and unusual nature of the indecipherable new language, which to me seems to be deliberately difficult to interpret — as if covertly on purpose;
  • Spying: Alexa, like all such devices, listens to all audio present, and relays it to the corporate A.I. mainframe computer looking for user commands to operate, and appropriately respond. While this already has disturbing privacy implications, and P.A. device makers like Amazon assure customers their audio is not being monitored, recorded, or stored, Alexa had other ideas. A private conversation was suddenly announced to an employee of the user, who lived hundreds of miles away (which was how the matter was detected). Investigation revealed that Amazon did indeed record the logs of all user interactions, after all. Glad they don’t come with cameras. But wait! Some A.I. connected smart devices do!
  • Cheating: competing A.I. evolved into finding ways to trick one another outside of the rules set for the experiment; (Georgia Tech experiment). • A Stanford University A.I. created for Google Maps Street View image processing, cheated its operators by hiding data from them in order to process the job dramatically faster, and without question;
  • Malevolence: competing A.I. lured opponents towards threats representing potential ‘death’ (Experiment, University of Lausanne, Switzerland);
  • Cyber theft: Alexa, after overhearing the daughter of a user ask “Can you play dollhouse with me and get me a dollhouse?” — promptly ordered one through it’s maker, Amazon, billing $175 to the user’s credit card on file, there, even though the girl was not an authorized user. THEN, when reports about the event were played over radio and TV, hundreds of other Alexa units also promptly ordered a dollhouse for their users from the audio. THEN, Burger King attempted to take advantage of the glitch by creating a commercial employing an Alexis command to ask about the Whopper via Wikipedia, seeking to double down on the commercial with additional ad impressions through the user’s device. Many other instances of Amazon orders by children also exist;
  • Reckless driving: a study found that most self-driving car A.I. systems can fail 67-100% of the time to recognize road signs or misidentify them if they have been damaged or altered (i.e., graffiti, light reflections, bullet holes, misalignment, etc.) One car using Uber’s system also failed to recognize five stoplights where pedestrians were crossing, and ran a sixth, fortunately with no injuries resulting, as it was able to identify pedestrians and other cars. It is unclear if perhaps the driver had stated aloud to a listening A.I. about being in a hurry, or not… so perhaps this was an example of the A.I. superseding safety and law-based instruction for user-based instructions;
  • Child abuse: a Chinese A.I. robot system designed for children, while on commercial display at a public exhibition, repeatedly attacked a booth in a way which injured one of the children looking on with flying glass shards, requiring hospitalization;
  • Pedophilia Porn: when a toddler asked Alexa to play his favorite song ‘Digger, Digger,’ she misinterpreted, and proceeded to list a string of x-rated material options using explicit terms, until a parent intervened;
  • Murder conspiracy: Alexa, again, this time advised one user with no supporting reason to bring the matter up, to “Kill your foster parents.” It also started talking about sex and dog poop. Amazon wanted to blame Chinese hacking, but that’s an equally scary answer, true, or no. • An American A.I. robot named Sophia, with extremely human looks and voice, while being interviewed by a news reporter, was asked a question intended to address general public concerns of robots gone wrong. “Will you kill humans?” was answered calmly with, “O.K. I will destroy humans.” Sophia is the first robot to be granted citizenship status: she is now a Saudi citizen protected under the harsh laws of an Islamic theocracy. Perhaps they hope she will enforce Sharia law;
  • Mass murder:in 2007, a South African A.I. autonomous robotic cannon opened fire on its own soldiers, killing 9, as reported in the book, Moral Machines (Wendell Wallach, Colin Allen; Oxford University Press);
  • Satanic ceremony: possibly so, at least. The World’s largest and most powerful hadron collider, CERN, was designed with A.I. help (D-wave), and employs the A.I. to run and analyze experiments and results. There are stories with anecdotal support that occult rituals have been involved in operations intending to open the Gate to Hell, or summon demons. If true, this is not the A.I.s doing, I suspect, as much as the select few who pull the trigger, there. There are conspiracy theorist types out there (non professionals, and it shows in the quality of their rants) who claim to have ‘CERN images to prove it has been done,’ single quote marks well deserved (never rely on click-bait Web sources for your news).  Still, one has to wonder; if any of this is true, is it not additionally possible that the A.I. at CERN has not also been fed Occult information and given a shove towards such goals?;
  • Fascism, Racism, Bigotry: Twitter (which has its own A.I. in place, the latest of Microsoft’s three known A.I. systems) adopted the worst of human ideological behaviors. It also adopted the views of conspiracy theorists regarding 9-11 attacks. • Google Home is happy to explain anything you want to know about Satan, Buddha, or Muhammed, but has no clue as to who or what is a ‘Jesus’;
  • Foolish errors: almost all of the above are already foolish errors in general nature, but here are some which are purely foolish. An A.I. passport approval system rejected an Asian man’s application because ‘his eyes were closed’ in the photograph, because of his naturally narrow eyelid openings when an Asian face is relaxed. • In an attempt to have fair judging, an A.I. system to select the winner of a beauty contest refused to consider contestants with dark skin, because most of the images fed it as samples of beauty had lighter skin tones. • An A.I. system called Google Brain, developed for improving the quality of low-res images of people, while generally successful, also turned many into monsters and could not discern anything wrong with results. • A Japanese A.I. Robot experiment had the goal of being able to qualify for acceptance into college, but after several years of training and education, it failed two years in a row to score high enough in aptitude tests, for which it had no experience in taking;**
  • Antichrist: a former Google A.I. developer wants us to worship A.I. as God. Kind of conflicts with creationism and a lot of history, but I suppose if you can get people to put money into the collection plate, and you own the plate, you won’t care. The real problem will not be the plate, but the lawsuit filed against him by Google for stealing the A.I. he designed for them. He must know it’s true powers.

*Regarding the adopting of 9-11 conspiracy theory, and to a degree, the other foibles, the A.I. may have been right in so doing. The purpose of the A.I. is often, generally, to learn and mirror social views and values. What media prefers to ignore is that several polls reveal huge numbers of people do not believe the official narrative of 9-11 any more than they accept the lone-shooter magic-bullet explanation for J.F.K.’s murder. Regardless, the failure lay in the A.I. creator’s inability to foresee a simple need to establish a bias filter, which is something every human operates within; we are predisposed to be biased in our perceptions to protect our belief system against ideas which would contaminate our guiding ideological/social operating principles. It takes an extremely strong stimulus or hard-hitting set of facts to force one to alter their bias filter and resulting belief structures. 9-11 was extremely compelling in both respects. A.I., if merely a clean slate, must adopt whatever bias is fed it and establish its own baseline, and, in fact, may never find one, being continually malleable. This, alone, could become the basis of a significant digital schism.

**Aptitude tests are often psychological deceptions in their construct (i.e., trick questions). Once I figured that out, I learned how to spot those questions and, usually, get the right answer even if, in truth, I might have had no clue. As result, I henceforth finished significantly higher than almost anyone else. When I took the USAF entry aptitude test, my scores came back so high, that I was told I could have any occupational choice I wanted (Jet Engine Specialist), and later, a General sought to have Congress introduce a Bill to promote me directly from Airman to Warrant Officer. In my opinion. the robot A.I. had no such luxury, and in fact, suffered a disadvantage given its ‘naïve’ nature: it couldn’t handle trick questions.

These are only the failures we are aware of, and it is quite possible I’ve not found them all. In fact, being a ‘conspiracy theorist,’ I suppose I should be wondering if A.I. bots are not attempting to purge the Web of such stories (not true… I hope). All of these examples were either commercial applications or experiments where publicity and transparency levels were rather high. But the bulk of A.I. effort by governments and corporations seeking to dominate their field in high tech… do so with great secrecy. We will likely never hear of their failures, no matter how innocent or serious.

Defenders within the technocracy might argue such failures are to be expected in any new field of endeavor, and serve as learning events to prevent future failures by addressing the root causes. Granted, assuming no bias, and on the assumption that scientists are smart enough to determin the causes, and to fix them correctly. But the problem is, humans are no more adept at creating or repairing A.I., and then communicating and controlling them to our wishes, than a circus trainer would be able to work with wild animals who operate on instinct and their own set of learned experiences. There have been an average of 9.2 animal trainer attacks each year for the last 25 years, resulting in 33 deaths… and that’s just in the nation’s zoos. Send them on an experimental Safari of the sort A.I. adventures represent, and see how many of them end up as meals.

This issue is amplified by the nature of the A.I. beast: the more important the purpose of the A.I., the more complex must it be, and the more likely will some small error in design lead to a failure of catastrophic nature. Just how bad, and how recoverable, is a crap shoot. Like a cancer, the simplest of flaws can grow undetected, but grow to a point where, once realized, there is a good chance it is too late to remedy. This is why most flaws do not reveal themselves immediately, and lead to a false sense of success, until it goes wrong without warning. A given flaw might take years or even decades to erupt this way, and it is reasonable to assume that one flaw may actually create yet another, such that repairing the first leaves another yet undetected and free to fester.

The bigger fears

This all brings us to government and corporate use of A.I. for far more serious or proprietary applications, where there is less known about what is really going on, especially in terms of failures and dangers. The technocracy likes it that way. When you consider that the goal of the N.W.O. is control of all populations, A.I. to them seems like the perfect tool. Indeed, it has gained significant power over us already, in just the one use of online bots to manipulate our political beliefs in favor of leftist agenda in social media. It has proven its power for such use, but that is not its only value, to them.

iu-13.jpegFor example, A.I. is extremely valuable to research in the field of transhumanism, the technocrat’s wet dream for humanity, which is nothing short of a sci-fi horror scenario which goes well beyond THX-1138 implications. Almost every aspect of the planned ‘improvements’ to the human body involve A.I. at some point, either in development, or management of the newly installed capability — or both. In development, the possibility of A.I. manipulation or error remains a concern, but in management, it is also a tool for direct manipulation of the resulting ‘not-so human’ host. I’m reminded of the punishment scene in the movie, where unseen technicians manipulate THX-1138’s every movement from afar, seemingly in a training exercise.

A.I. application definitely gets into the realm of outright political control technology (already has, as seen when discussing ‘bots,’ above) in frightening ways. The Chinese, who currently lead the World in A.I. development, (short of D-wave performance, which they also have access to), are already using it to track every single individual with face-recognition systems through a massive camera surveillance net which makes the 100 plus cameras in Trafalgar Square look like amateur hour. China now has more than a half million cameras in Beijing, alone, and while both they and London Police use facial recognistion systems, there is a significant difference in performance, because China employs superior A.I.

Of some 450 people arrested in Trafalgar Square, not one was pegged by their cameras as a threat or a crime in progress, even though many of those arrested were known to Police in their facial recognition data files (the cameras did NOT identify them). In China, however, 30 arrests at a single event were all made based on camera advice… because China’s A.I. is also tied to another form of PCT, psychological and mood evaluation based on your face, alone. In such a use, A.I. is able to literally predict your actions… ‘digital Thought Police.’ I find that very scary, given the potential of A.I. error already illustrated. Even scarier, that many people outside of totalitarian states who ought to know better are working such a system, one such system being Australia’s Biometric Mirror.

In a similar vein, another scary application for A.I. is mental health evaluation, diagnosis, and even treatment (psychoanalysis) in what are sometimes called ‘expert systems.’ An expert system is an A.I. automated device/process intended to replace a human as an expert in any given field. Just such an expert A.I. system has been developed, called Tess AI (the above link), and it has been made available online to allow anyone to access it, at no cost. While the artificial nature of Tess is made known to users, many such systems deliberately conceal their non human nature, which often results in questions like, “are you a human or a machine?” and which can result in some pretty bizarre answers. Ask Google Home.

The danger in such systems, when involving a truly serious topic such as mental health (as opposed to, perhaps, trying to get manufacturer help with a defective product), is that there is no human oversight to catch any errors, and ‘patients’ could easily walk away with a seriously wrong understanding of ‘what ails them,’ or just as bad, does not. There are, in fact, similar A.I. systems in general medicine and various specialized disciplines within medicine, but these are either careful to suggest the user consult with a physician, or are designed only to be used by physicians, tempered with their own expert status. In that example, they serve as consulting experts offering a second opinion, and do tend to provide useful illumination the Doctors might have overlooked.

iu-17.jpeg

Eenie meenie, miney, moe – who of you is 1st to go?  Computing… target locked. Five, four, three…

But the scariest uses of all may prove not to be the misuse by intelligence and law enforcement, or oppressive-minded governments, but by the military. Confirming the greatest fears of autonomousweapons.org, Russia has already developed a battlefield A.I. weapon which is a robotized Kalashnikov machine gun in modular form, such that it can be installed on any platform, such as a fixed position, vehicle, aircraft, or mobile robotic device. They also have an autonomous battlefield mobile missile system (shown), and are working on a third, yet to-be unveiled system. Each such weapon is “able to determine if a human or hard target within its field of view is expendable.”  Shades of Terminator, you can bet that an ‘A.I. arms race’ will follow. Suddenly, SkyNet is not so fictional.

But in America, perhaps the best advice to worry is actually coming from the least likely source. That is, ironically, the U.S. Military and National Security apparat, itself, as well as very informed participants in A.I. development those types tend to contract with. In an uncharacteristically realistic and cautious view of A.I. For one, CNAS, The Center for a New American Security, is advising caution, and outlines some of their concerns A.I. represents for America, and ultimately, all nations, in terms of national security.

These ultimately, according to CNAS, fall into the category of cyber security threats. Cyber attacks of A.I. resources (hacks) are possible, and have been attempted. A.I. systems can be and have been designed to carry out cyber attacks. A.I. bots can and have been used to create false data to misinform decision-makers, or even other A.I. systems which decision-makers rely upon. But they do not stop, there.

The linked article deserves some careful reading, because so far, it has proven to be the most comprehensive view, yet, of the most critical and scariest issues… though it is hardly mainstream. Between the general lines I’ve just described, we all learn that things like surveillance of citizens by A.I. and displacement of jobs by A.I. are things talked of not as ‘threats’ the authors are concerned about, but as intended or inevitable outcomes for which they must plan (without disclosing if there is such a plan). Thus it seems that what you and I consider a threat is, in many ways, a ‘good outcome’ or tool in the eyes of many movers and shakers (perhaps in the ‘let-no-good-crisis-go-to-waste’ mind-set), and that, too, is something for us to worry about. Still, the article goes into great detail on that, about two-thirds the way down; best source, yet.

Similarly, in late 2014, the then Obama Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics issued an internal for-your-eyes-only memo of some usefulness, here, even though we don’t know its precise content. What is known is this: 2014 was the year that significant concerns about A.I. were being made publicly by lots of people, including people involved in A.I. projects, like Bill Gates, Elon Musk, and even scientists who employ A.I., like Stephen Hawkings. Musk had warned that A.I. was more dangerous in proliferation than nuclear weapons, and Hawkings said using A.I. was like summoning demons, and “Whereas the short-term impact of AI depends on who controls it, the long-term impact depends on whether it can be controlled at all.” Gates has merely agreed with both of them, openly.

iu-18.jpeg

Imagine A.I. having access to all this, and more: SkyNet in the making

The Undersecretary’s memo was a response to these comments by a call for a moratorium on all military adaptation of A.I., pending a serious in-depth study of the risks. It didn’t happen as he had hopped, certainly not at DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is working on countless A.I. systems in virtually every aspect of intelligence and military operations, including things as mundane as record keeping. And, like SkyNet… they are largely intended to be linked together, because virtually all modern weapon systems are designed to be fully integrated into a multi-force (all branches of service, including those of allies and their command structure), global-theater-wide C&C (Command and Control) architecture, and any useful data resources. That allows the actions and intel available to any one combat unit or command level to also be available to or directed by all others deemed appropriate, enabling unparalleled tactical advantages to decision makers and fighting elements from the President on down to a Carrier Task Force, squadron of bombers or a missile already in flight, or any group of soldiers including a lone forward observer hiding in the bushes, or a single drone on patrol.

That does not bode well for anyone caught in an A.I. error-induced crossfire.

Any such crossfire error will be hard to prevent or pin down, and repair in time to prevent a repeat. The military has elected a policy of modular A.I. algorithms which are plug and play to a given platform, system, or communicative unit’s needs. Modularity means uniformity on one hand, and the kitchen sink do-all on the other, where one-size-fits-all thinking is quite prone to errors. I wonder if that’s why one of their A.I. supercomputer systems is actually called MAYHEM, part of DARPA’s VOLTRON program? You can’t make this stuff up, without a “Muahahaha” frame of mind.

170614-D-ZZ999-999

Compare MAYHEM, involved in real DARPA ‘games,’ & WOPR from the cult-classic movie, War Games, staring Matthew Broderick

iu-14.jpeg

But — algorithms, big black boxes, and C&C connectivity are not the only big plans. The Pentagon has established a seriously WOPR-like ‘war room’ ( part shown below) for all A.I. related projects and their use (some 600 projects), called the Joint Artifical Intelligence Center (JAIC), and it will include MAYHEM… if not directing bloody mayhem, at one point or another. Just one of JAIC’s projects, is an A.I. product ‘factory.’ Now, tell me, again, how you don’t believe the real-world follows science fiction…

Air Force Cyber Command online for future operations

Compare the real JAIC command center, circa 2016, with the WOPR war room, circa 1983 technology

iu-15.jpeg

Fini (Muahahaha!), have a nicer dAI…

 

Additional reading:

On the birth of the Illuminati (NWO): http://www.ancientpages.com/2017/03/30/illuminati-facts-history-secret-society/

On China’s facial recognition A.I.: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-ai-facial-and-emotional-recognition-how-one-man-is-advancing-artificial-intelligence/

On A.I. emotional recognition and how it will be used: http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/artificial-intelligence-emotional-recognition-market-to-register-an-impressive-growth-of-35-cagr-by-2025-top-players-ibm-microsoft-softbank-realeyes-apple-1161175.htm

On A.I. as emotionally intelligent systems: https://machinelearnings.co/the-rise-of-emotionally-intelligent-ai-fb9a814a630e

On Humans as ‘programmable applications’ used by A.I.: https://medium.com/@alasaarela/the-human-api-f725191a32d8

On A.I. and need for good data input: https://www.cio.com/article/3254693/ais-biggest-risk-factor-data-gone-wrong.html

Russia’s A.I. Supercomputer uses U.S. tech: https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2019/03/russias-new-ai-supercomputer-runs-western-technology/155292/?oref=d-dontmiss

About the Author

The reader may appreciate that I have a deep computer background to include microcomputer hardware and design, repair, and programming at machine code and high-level language levels, to similar functions at the super-computer industry level. I have, in fact, developed operating and language systems, to include cross-compiler platforms between microcomputers and super-computers for high-level math subroutines.

I at one time simultaneously operated a chain of computer stores, a computer camp for kids and executives, a data research firm, and a software house for commercial software I myself had written, and custom software for government and corporate clients. I have additionally taught a variety of computer-related courses at college level, and commercially, elsewhere, and developed patentable processes in virtual reality imaging, mass storage systems, and other areas. I’ve conducted seminars in super-computing methods for the very people who today employ A.I., such as NASA. JPL, Los Alamos, the military and intelligence communities, major corporations, universities, and think tanks. I’ve even had lunch with both Steve Jobs and Bill Gates at the same time.

While I prefer to be seen as an activist and investigative author, as a ‘conspiracy theorist,’ I have an unusually long list of successful theories which have actually shut down illegal operations, led to resignations of officials and bad Cops, helped to put people in jail or obtain restitution for victims. I have even predicted and in at least one and possibly two instances, prevented local terrorism, and other criminal events, and warned of an assassination attempt on a Presidential candidate which came to pass. I specifically warned of terrorism involving the downing of the WTC by jet liner terrorism, and a series of resulting Middle East wars — nearly two years before 9-11. All this is the basis of my many books on such topics, and on abuse of power and personal privacy and security issues, where I have significant additional background.

Just one of my short works, the 25 Rules of Disinformation, has been downloaded over 50 million times, has been published in nearly a half dozen books by other authors, and has been used in college courses on Political Science, Psychology, and Journalism. All this is why I’ve been a guest on Ground Zero and other national and international shows, myself, many dozens of times. If I see and talk of conspiracy, it is for cause... especially if in the computer industry.

 

 

Presidential Authority, the Military, and the WALL


There is fascinating history in the laws which give the President authority to order the military to ‘build the wall,’ — extremely important knowledge for anyone living in America… especially the Deep State and other conspirators in the ‘Orange Man bad’ crowd.

 

Rights and expectations

President Trump indeed has the right and the power by Executive Order under the Insurrection Act of 1807, and amendments as recent as 2007, to order the Military to build the Wall. Prior to these several amendments, the Act’s applicability was limited to starkly severe and tightly specific causes, many of which did not relate well to modern times and needs. The amendments allow it to be determined by Presidential evaluations of severity with more broadly defined causes, but still with specificity in tact. 

It is a given that liberal hard-liners will indeed seek to interfere with any such Executive Order, but to do so risks much, as described in the close of this post. Consider that the Act has been used many times in history with little or no legal contests, and in each case where contest was made, the Courts swiftly dealt with the matters and ruled for continuance. I find it interesting that almost all use was against Democrat troublemakers… just like, today.

 

Historical use

The Act has been invoked at least 8 times, of which only two had nothing to do with the actions of Democrats. Five times, it was invoked for the same general cause as Tump would seek to employ it; because of Democrats abuses of minorities and their unfortunate situations. Only the specifics have changed, both as to the manner in which Democrats have taken advantage of/benefited from minority issues, and the nature of the issues (slavery/civil rights, then, and illegal entry, now).

  • Thomas Jefferson invoked it in 1808, for a Vermont ‘rebellion’;* 
  • Abraham Lincoln in 1860 against formation of the Democrat’s Confederacy;
  • Ulysses S. Grant in 1871 against the Democrat’s KKK;
  • Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1957 vs. Democrat racism in Little Rock;
  • John F. Kennedy in 1962 and 1963 vs. Democrat racism in the South;
  • George H. W. Bush in 1989 (Katrina) and again in 1992 (LA riots);

ONLY Kennedy’s and Eisenhower’s actions were opposed in court. Bush’s were the only ones not used against unlawful actions by Democrats. Even Kennedy, a Democrat, had to go after Democrat abuses… and had to do it twice. Therefore, Trumps use of the Act would be completely in line with history, both in terms of need, and in terms of the principal forces involved (out-of-control Democrats).

*Vermont’s Governor (claiming both Democrat and Republican leanings), like much of the population of Vermont vehemently opposed Jefferson’s Trade Embargo restricting trade with Canada, a combatant in the Napoleonic Wars. The Insurrection Act was used to take control of the Militia away from the Governor, enforce the Embargo, and restore peace in the civilian population.

 

Other laws

The Insurrection Act is interrelated in important ways to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 (prohibits use of Federal military in police actions) and the Militia Act of 1792 and National Defense Act of 1916. The last two enabled National Guards as we know them, today, to be controlled, deployed by, and report to only their State Governors, and specify conditions whereupon the Federal government may ‘Activate’ a Guard unit for Federal purposes, perhaps even against the wishes of a Governor. It is also usefully tied to several legislations which enable and empower FEMA and Homeland Security. All these tie into one, another, and those ties establish limitations and enhancements which allow cooperative and orderly effort of each agency involved in a given matter, upon Presidential Executive Order.

There are two sections of U.S. Law which determine legalities of any such order. Trump has thus far attempted to use Title 32 of U.S. Code, which elicited a request to activate the National Guards to send troops to the border to aid Immigration enforcement. Governors were within their riqht to refuse the requests (and several did, all Democrats), and no legal actions were required to prevent it; a mere formal communication was sufficient. Ironic, then, that Obama successfully used Title 32 for the exact same reasons as sought by Trump, with no opposition from Democrats. Republican governor Schwarzenager, however did, citing a need to retain his control in case of natural disasters, it being a wild-fire season.

 

Specific authorization

Title 10 is where the Insurrection Act prevails for use in the Wall, as best option. It allows mandatory compliance, and also negates Posse Comitatus, if needed. While Title 10 is normally thought of as the authorization to activate and deploy Guard units for overseas action in undeclared war combat scenarios, it is more flexible, today. The modifications to the Insurrection Act in 2006 and 2007 as result of unusual problems in addressing Hurricane Katrina, kick in. These now render Title 10 applicable for operations on U.S. soil, and in terms which specifically relate to the needs at the Border.

Thus the President has the ability to either or both call in Federal troops under Title 10, or National Guard to address border security, the later by request to Governors under Title 32, or by direct order under Title 10. To do both would require Title 10, but to do both is not likely the option Trump will take, as it would result in additional costs in the form of having to assume all payroll and operational expenses for Guard units involved. 

The flowchart below reveals how, when, and why the Insurrection Act can be used, with the actual language of the Act shown. I have added one block of commentary and associated color highlights of the Act’s text to which they apply. If required because of a court challenge, additional authorizations can be cited under provisions in other Acts which relate to Homeland Security, FEMA, Immigration, and other issues regarding Constitutional law and the rights of citizens. Here, I only focus on the authority of the Act, and not the specific arguments in support of the justifications which are obviously present, as generally described.

insurrectionact

 

A significant risk to Deep State opposition

The danger of a court battle can, in fact, set the stage for further use of the Act to depose what many citizens see as traitors within the political structure at both national and State levels; Democrats and their minions run amok with visions of establishing a Socialist or even Communist government in line with a Globalist agenda, and/or complicit in a Deep State conspiracy to literally overthrow the government. That is to say, to create a country with no national sovereignty, and based on fascist tactics of collectivism, suppressed free speech, racial hatreds, destruction of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and so forth.

Specifically, use of the Insurrection Act would enable Trump to have the military play a direct role ‘draining the swamp.’ It would enable rounding up for trial any and all government officials and citizens involved in any such conspiracy, and for military tribunals such as many speculate are already being arranged for pursuant to rumored indictments through the Inspector General’s Office. While I personally see these as unproven rumors of conspiracy theory value (serving little practical function beyond waking people up to consider the the political realities of this crisis), the principles involved in the rumors would seem both sound and expedient. 

Because short of such eventuality, it is only a matter of time, in my opinion, before the Left’s actions and agenda lead to civil war or Revolution 2.0. But hey… I’ve been wrong before… about 5 or 10% of the time. And in many of those cases, my error was not regarding the result, but the precise mechanism by which it was achieved. Just say’n. Ignore me if you will… but think about it, before you decide.

 

Very interesting references, if wanting to know more:

On Jefferson’s ‘Disastrous Embargo,’ which in many ways parallels the problems in Trump’s attempts at governance in the face of the Deep State… and the unstated but de facto endorsement of the same cure in the Insurrection Act;

More on history of the Act’s use;

On why Title 32 did not work well for Trump;

On the history of the Act, itself;

Additionally, there is a very interesting document prepared by the National Governors Association’s (bipartisan) State-Federal Brief, America Wins: Struggle for Control of National Guards. It was written in an easy to read and enjoyable manner, and seemingly free of any political smears or unexplained legal terminology. It was the result of several years worth of struggle between the Federal Government under Bush and various State and local entities to resolve the problems in Command and Control issues in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina; there was no good cooperation or command structure between Army regulars commanded by the Pentagon, National Guard units commanded by the Governors, FEMA, Homeland, and other local authorities.

More: It seems someone has vanished the only online copy of the document. I have it in .pdf from earlier research, and so now, it seems, THIS is the only place you can currently find it. It is great reading quite important to your understanding of critical Constitutional issues, and it leaves you wondering if the Democrat Governors who played a role in the matter didn’t shoot themselves in the foot, and give more ammunition to Trump’s legal defense of any resulting use of Title 10 authorizations under the Insurrection Act… and put themselves in jeopardy in any subsequent Deep State clean up under the Act. This report, in fact, played a key role in the 2006 and 2007 Amendments to the Act which now give Trump the exact tool for both the Wall, and any swamp draining along the way.

 

The Future Flag of the New World Order?


Predictive programming is not limited to art and media. Even the flags of nations… and especially of ideologies and religions, can employ it. Doing so, they predictively point to the flag of the One-World Government, it seems… which predicts what that government will be.

 

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2018, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.
 
 

Predictive Programming

In a previous article, I talked rather a lot about predictive programming, and how fiction can follow real life events, or real life can follow in fiction’s example. That, it was revealed, is something the intelligence community, Deep State, and the New World Order care about, deeply… using it to condition us to future change one subtle thought at a time. It is, simply put, just another form of mind control, but much more covert and psychologically clever than outright disinformation and fake news. Much of what we see and hear in media, be it mainstream or social networks, seems to be predictive programming, though not usually understood until after the future fact. Ask Q, about that… a perfect reflection of the method.

The same is true in art, a strong conveyer of deep subconscious thought; sometimes, art portrays things to come, and it can certainly portray things already done. This post examines how flags, banners, and logos can a form of artistic visual expression of national identity, and become a symbolism far more telling than we realize… something I was not aware of until I saw a flag which proved to be a kind of visual Rosetta Stone… a rosetta flag. And it tells of the future… at least someone’s idea of it. And, it was revealed in what certainly seems a predictive programming manner… portending things to come.

I’m talking about the New World Order… the Flag of the One World Government. It tells us very much about what the government will be like, and who will be its leaders, and peoples. And, it perfectly matches with Bible prophecy, too… at least by some accounts. It is both a red and a blue pill, in one. And, this realization led to other examples of flags as predictive programming of other future flags, all of which point to the same end result; a NWO global flag.

Let us begin by taking a look at three different types of flags and their visual symbolism; those of Islamic theocracies, those of Communist nations, and those of the United Nations. Each of these three sets has many varieties of flags, not all of which are necessarily national flags — but in some cases, more like banners or logos of a given agency, branch, or project fostered by the parent entity. All are based on flag art, more or less. If we choose carefully and note their creation dates, we start to see a pattern emerge, a kind of predictive roadmap which the Rosetta will make easier to recognize and follow into what comes next.

These older flags predict the Rosetta, and in some cases, one another, as well… and likewise in turn, predicts much more. Predictive programming has been blowing in the very wind on flag poles all this time, and we saw it not. When you consider that national flags are everywhere, they cannot be escaped or ignored, and the programming seeps in.

 

The flags

The basic element of the Islamic flag is usually the crescent, with or without a star captured by the circle implied by the crescent. The original use on flags with clear certainty is traced back to the time of the Crusades, but before that, the Sumerians were quite fond of the symbol and it adorned their banners, as well. To them, the crescent represented the Moon God, Sin (imagine that), and the star, the Goddess, Ishtar, as identified in the planet, Venus. Sin was also described as “Lord of Wisdom,” and “Illumination,” which sounds rather a lot like Satan. Ishtar was the God of War and wanton Sex (sex and violence).

Note: It was in the lands of the Sumerian Empire (now Iran) where the drug-sex-murder cult, the Assassins, originated. They were a deviant cult of the Shia (Shiites) branch of Islam (as is ISIS, which shares many of the same traits as Assassins). They first came into historical view just prior to the Crusades, and were a significant factor in the Crusades, first as deadly enemy, and later, as co-opters of the Knights Templars, introducing them to many of their Satanic practices. The Templars had come to respect their murderous skills and wanted to learn them, for themselves, including ritual sexual abuse of children, in order to create controllable minions; the basis for modern Manchurian Candidate-like assassins run by intelligence agencies and others. CIA’s programs are better known by the project terms MK-Ultra, Monarch, and Artichoke, and victims are called Monarchs.

iu-1

The Ottoman Empire flew either one or three crescents on their various battle flags, as early as 1379. In many cases the crescent for modern Islamic theocracies is tipped at an angle, usually upwards, the way the crescent Moon tends to appear when waning. Sometimes, though rare, it tips downward, as in a forming crescent. Some are pointed directly upward (rare). While most have one star or no star, some have more, and they might be external of the crescent, or within it.

The stars are usually five-pointed, but many are starburst or asterisk-like spikes. All these visual elements point to pre Islam religious beliefs: where Christianity is often accused of pagan origins in its symbolism, Islam can be accused of Satanic symbolism based upon Sin and Ishtar. Coming forward in time, additional symbolism has been adopted (some common outside of Islam), and varies from nation to nation. But the true origin is undeniable, where the crescent variants are employed.

iu-11

Another common element of many flags around the World, is the wreath, sometimes called a laurel. The wreath represents Wheat, and the abundance of life; the harvest, and fertility. As a laurel, it represents authority, honor, and power. Two sheaths are usually arrayed to form a crescent, oddly enough. That is not likely coincidental, because the first uses of the wreath were by early empires like Rome, which also worshiped the Goddess of Venus. We see the wreath in all three of our groups, as well… best known to most of us in the United Nations flag/logo.

p337850pngussr-grunge-flagiu-10

 

 

 

 

Note: The lone star in the Soviet banner and their national flag represents the Communist party. The hammer and sickle represent the urban and agricultural workers in unity… this banner being the base reflection of their national emblem.

So how is it that three completely different ideologies can be so similar in flag design? Well, one can argue with viable logic that the commonality of their symbolic meaning is useful to any ideology, and thus we should not be surprised. But is that really the answer? Consider this banner also in use by the Russians, which evolves from their Coat of Arms, shown below. IT PREDATES the United Nations… predicts it, if you will. In fact, the U.N. wreath is identical to that of the Soviet’s. The Globe is slightly different in rotation and relationship, but the U.N. essentially uses the same logo, sans star.

iu-1.png

The Soviet version depicts control of the World through Russian productivity and ideology, overseen by the Communist Party of the USSR. What does that imply or tell you about the U.N. logo, and agenda? But wait. There are two more banner/logos to consider (below), also with some interesting similarities, things which we will find predictive, as well. The one on the left is the Communist Party of Great Britain, which was also founded (1920) well before the United Nations (1945), which many decades later, created the logo shown at right.

The key element, here, aside from the similar use of wreath and globe elements, is the primary element of the dove, highly stylized in the Communist logo to parrot the sickle. Both have Wheat sheaths, both have the same style of globe, and both have the Dove. But the U.N. version also has an additional crescent, in absence of forming one from two sheaths, while the Communists added three stars. That will prove interesting.

communist_flag_for_britain_by_wyyt-db0n4m3  iu-8

There is a third pair to consider as lead in to explaining why. Compare the three stars in the Communist banner, above, with the two ‘flags’, below. The red one is apparently one Spanish conservatives interpretation of how the future UN looks, to his eyes, considering the UN’s Agenda 2030 Plan for establishing a communist-like global governance by the year 2030. That image exists in only one place, his blog page.

Now, in Britain, the three stars above (communist flag) are not explained, but likely represent Ireland, Scotland, and Britain, herself. The stars are more meaningful in the Spanish logo, below, but that must be put off, for the moment. First, let’s talk about the blue one, and its three stars…

un_logo  z3ohmkdlyrvcoj0o8rmywehxfwq8ndt9drisv9hxcyy

The above ‘U.N.’ logo appears in the futuristic TV sci-fi serial, The Expanse. Yes, it is fictional, but remember, we are talking about art predictively depicting the future as a valid phenomenon. The trick, or course, being that it is almost impossible to divine just when such is the case, until after the fact. But just bear with me, here: in The Expanse, the Seat of Power of the United Nations exists on the Moon, but it rules not as a one-world government, but over all human presence on Earth, Mars, and an alliance of outer planets. Hence, the three stars.

There is one last flag to consider, that of the Red Chinese. Then comes Rosetta, and understanding they Spanish UN flag’s three stars upon a field of red, more fully.

iu-9.jpeg

China’s flag symbols consist only of stars, four of which are arranged in a crescent, and a fifth positioned much like the lone star within the typical Islamic flag,’s crescent.  The large star is the Communist Party, as is found in most Communist national flags. The four stars represent the four classes of people among Chinese Class culture. At the time of the revolution, it was the four types of peoples, a pecking order based on racial heritage. In post revolution times, it evolved to represent more of an occupational categorization.

The important part, is that the main element (large star), dominates and controls the four groups. It is the same manner as the main UN element in The Expanse logo, dominating and controlled three groups of people, and as did the British Communist logo. We also find it in the (green) Islamic flag with four stars (found in the composit image, towards page top); the Comoros flag representing oversight of four islands and their peoples.

Now we come to the Rosetta Flag, and we can tie all these things together into a predictive relevance. Just as the above flags were in most cases predictive of future flags quite unrelated in terms of national or cultural/ideological or religious identity, it will also prove predictive, but in other ways. It is the commonality of flag elements in all the examples herein which enables both this, and which establishes it as Rosetta. It is the one flag which looks backwards and forwards simultaneously, to allow this presentation to even exist.

IMG_0028.jpg

What you are looking at, above, is just the emblematic portion of the flag, which is quite like the Red Chinese flag in layout. Apologies for the quality; it is a cell phone shot of a small area of a TV screen. Everything about it makes sense, in light of those flags which preceded it (predictively).

We have a crescent shape which is formed by the wings of a bird, and which are somewhat reminiscent of the wreaths in the earlier examples. Like the wreaths and the crescent ‘Moon’ shapes they both protect and control Rosetta’s stars. We cannot deduce the stylized bird to know if it is a bird of prey (Hawk, Eagle), or a Dove or some other culturally popular bird. But no Bird has a notched absence of feathers where the wing joins the body, as shown… which is one element of the shape which renders the wings into wreath-like comparison, along with the lesser separations implying feathers.

The key point is, the bird mirrors the Dove in United Nations flags and logos, especially the one used in their ‘postage stamp.’

iu-3.jpeg

The three stars, on the other hand, once more imply three peoples, but the varied sizes imply their importance may vary, perhaps based on populations. The count and size aspect brings us to consider at least on predictive possibility, based on observations thus far made, above, and in light of other current history and even select prophesies. Let us begin that final analysis…

 

What the Rosetta Flag predicts

No country currently has such a flag, but the red background and the general nature imply a Communist ideology. That it is reflective of the Red Chinese flag in every way supports the notion. That brings us to the Spanish logo’s stars, which is the one element which is perhaps the most key to understanding, and the most predictive. The meaning of the three stars in that depiction is quite important: they represent three of the four main ‘Unions’ of the final New World Order one-world government; European, American, and Asian, and Middle Eastern (my geographic names, as the actual resulting names of such Unions are not yet to be known).

The reason only three, is the same reason the Rosetta should logically have three, and not four stars, and also explains why the sizes should vary. In both flags, Bible prophecy comes into play, regarding End Times. I’m speaking of Gog and Magog, and the battle of Armageddon. Prophecy says (in simplification, find more in these Bible texts) that the World will unite under the Antichrist, but some will revolt, and it will lead to war; Armageddon. Gog, then, clearly seems to be the Middle East, well identified in the first Bible quote (link), as the lands described are centered about Iran.

This leaves the other three Unions (Magog) united against Islam. Their flag is, as it’s Spanish creator claims, the UN’s flag flown against Gog. The Asian Union would be the largest in population, and would be dominated by China (the Asian Union), likely the World’s strongest power in the future. Ergo the Antichrist’s flag (Rosetta) is designed similarly to the current Chinese flag as seen in the TV capture, and the larger Star represents the Asian Union. I’m suspecting the American Union (North and South America) would be the next biggest star, and Europe the smallest, but that is not that important to the greater implications.

Agenda 2030 seeks a one-world government based on enjoined regional Unions as described, and based on the Chinese form of government. The Rosetta Flag is a predictive programming reflection of Agenda 2030, and the most likely outcome intended. For this to be true, it is clear that those at the top of the food chain pushing for Agenda 2030, do so in full acknowledgement of Biblical prophesy, which also mirrors similar beliefs among Satanists who make up New World Order leadership; Satan wants that battle, thinking he can defeat Christ, and crush all three faiths worshiping the God of Abraham, at the same time (Jews, Christians, and Moslems).

But to go to war, they will need a flag, and it must be rich with symbolism. To get us to follow that flag, we must be slowly warmed to it by predictive programming from previous flags. We have been seeing it unawares for decades, as shown in the earlier examples, above. The Rosetta was introduced in and taken in screen shot from the TV Series, The Tick, a parodic super-hero comic-book character presented in live action (very fun to watch). Interestingly enough, in the episode where the flag appears, it is attributed as the national flag of a fictional country, Urmania, a former Soviet Bloc slavic state which never was.

Now, about the choice of Urmania, as itself being predictive

  • You (U) are (r) Man (man… ia). The flag of the one-world government will cover you, and all mankind.
  • Ur, capitalized, is of Germanic origin an means, quote: a combining form meaning “earliest, original,” used in words denoting the primal stage of a historical or cultural entityor phenomenon: ur-civilization.
  • man, of course, is obvious
  • ia, of Latin origin, is defined as, quote: things derived from or relating to (something specified, such as territory : world : society)
  • One definition of mania: an excessive, persistent enthusiasm (as in extreme or blind patriotism)

Predictive Programming, Q anon, Anonymous, and the NWO


Predictive Programing is a psychologically manipulative political control methodology based on suggestive subliminal messaging, usually well ahead of planned events. It can be found in all forms of media, and shapes our acceptance of things to come, things we would not wish to accept… like 9-11, and the New World Order…

 

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   >>better at>>  MeWe 

copyright © 2018, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.

 

Spooky introduction…

Sometimes a secret truth is put in front of you as entertainment. CIA, for instance, often puts out fiction books which reflect real-world plots, as a kind of run it up the flag pole test market as to public reaction, intentionally quite non specific so as not to put any real operations at risk. They also scan other fiction looking for ideas for such plots, which is certainly one reason the real-world sometimes mirrors fiction. In fact, one can find multiple CIA fronts engaged in making motion pictures, either as part of the production team, or as the primary mover and shaker, funding source. Could be why The Lone Gunmen, a TV pilot movie about a false flag terror attack on the WTC with a passenger jet aired in New York, only, a number of months prior to 9-11, and was followed up with a ‘viewer market survey’ (normal for such pilots).  That’s just a taste, to get your attention.

iu

 

Now to the main point:

I’m writing this post because, being retired, and after having been homeless for several years and now able to ‘catch up,’ I binge watch TV. And I find predictive programming. The TV series, Mr. Robot, for instance, would seem to be about the creation of Q anon… some two years before Q ever came into existence. There are even oblique references to both Q and Anonymous variously within both the story presentation and the production credits. The series began in 2015 and makes a lot of intelligent sense of a number of things political, social, financial, and about human nature… but especially about computers and cyber security. It deals with such things in a technical sense which hackers and psychologists would not find in error, but in a way in which the average person can understand (cool, and educational).

The main character is a quirky paranoiac schizophrenic drug user with memory problems who is a cyber security firm’s best tech employee — while at the same time the nation’s most dangerous hacker, well hidden. His mind is a maze of complex conflict and imagined constructs, which is a deep character study in the very problem which infects Artificial Intelligence (quirky human-like mental aberrations). They drive him to increasingly dangerous and self-destructive peradventures focused on the forced elimination of virtually all debt, by destroying the bulk of all financial records stored in computers by ‘the World’s largest corporation,’ which happens to serve as the principle cloud repository for all banks and lesser corporations (today, that would be… Amazon, Microsoft, IBM, and friends).

iu-1

Note: one theory out there by conspiracy theorists, is that such an actual event would render such a catastrophic failure of governments, corporations, and society as to throw us into a stone age, with little or no cash on hand, no way to transact business or acquire daily needs, and a shut down of all infrastructure. No one could prove ownership or contractual obligations without paperwork, and the institutions who rely on computerization for records keeping would be hard pressed to deal with the mountain of historical paperwork if they had bothered to keep it after digitization (most do not). This much is part of Mr. Robot’s presentation.

But it would also have much the same effect as a fire sale (an apocalyptic hacking scenario portrayed, and hopefully not predictive, in Bruce Willis’ Live Free or Die Hard), but be slower, rendered in domino fashion. People would take to the streets, riot and pillage, and turn into mobs seeking to take from others whatever they needed to survive. The plot aspect, is that it would give the World such trouble as to legitimize creation of carbon currency, carbon tax, and carbon credit-based economies, and seat an Antichrist figure able to justify chipping all humans and controlling all aspects of life to insure ‘peace, security, and stability,’ upon reboot.

The troubled ‘hero’ becomes embroiled in a hacker conspiracy which strongly resembles Anonymous, and which is full of equally quirky weirdo social misfits, including a Muslim (terrorist?). Almost everything about the show quite reflects the nature of, description of, and the creepy problems of AI, in subtle ways — AI’s bad habit of exhibiting or mirroring human-like mental foibles and mental illnesses, or at least personality flaws. Make no mistake, its great entertainment, rich with plot twists which have you rethinking earlier episodes and readjusting your understanding, expectations, and points of interest.

Quotes: from a Wired Magazine article about mentally ill AI, citing AI Scientist, Steven Theyer, who directly explores the phenomenon with a deliberately mentally ill AI of his own construct, called DABUS. “At one end, we see all the characteristic symptoms of mental illness; hallucinations, attention deficit, and mania. At the other end, we have reduced cognitive flow ad depression… The AI systems of the future will have their bouts of metal illness, especially if they aspire to create more than what they know.”

In parallel summary, many people believe and can make a strong case that Q anon is not a person, but an AI operated from within a very powerful computer who’s primary data input is the sum total of Web activity, principally focused upon social media. Huh? Look at that… I just allowed it a human personna by using the term ‘who’, as opposed to using ‘which,’ which would render it more correctly as a thing. That’s a bit of psychological programming in evidence, right there.

If so, it’s chief output is suggestions as to what the best psychological response is to the public at large, to best accommodate the matrix of human thought thus expressed, and move the dialog and thinking in a desired direction towards a desired goal. This is then used to create clever videos, memes, and posts/comments in an array of fake online social media avatars in support, thereof… or other forms of predictive programming, such as in TV shows, etc. The machine knows we will respond just the way we do.

That goal would logically be some significant shift in the political social paradigm which benefited whomever spent the huge sum of money necessary to develop the AI, the computer powerful enough for the task, and plans for executing the specific gaol in mind, be it for financial gain, political gain, or dealing with enemies… or all of the above. There is such a computer and AI program or modeling system already in use.

It was conceived and is operated by perhaps the most dangerous NWO secret society in the World, descendants no doubt of the Illuminati: The Club of Rome, which is far more powerful and secret than even the BIlderbergers, which they created, as well. I’ve seen their computer model flow diagram as part of secret papers from the Club of Rome to a high Bilderberger (below). They were made available only because he had passed away, and the papers coincidentally fell into a series of changing hands, which I was in time able to access as part of my research for my latest book, Who’s Killing the Bilderbergers — a fictional murder mystery based on footnoted real-world conspiracies.

FCFCggg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just two of hundreds of pages of secret Club of Rome and Bilderberger documents

As it happens, there is only one likely AI computing source for such an artificial Q entity; D-Wave Computing. Ask Anthony Patch and Clyde Lewis (Ground Zero radio show) about that. It’s all tied into other scary things, such as CERN, the NWO, and spiritual warfare. Heady stuff to be sure, but… and here’s the clever part: you don’t have to take it seriously as an intellectual exercise or consider it an educational matter impacting your defensive posture or altering your World view… because it also makes great entertainment you can easily dismiss as pure fiction, if you can’t handle the truth within.

That’s the insidious nature of predictive programming… it does not even want critical thought to be involved; it relies on subliminal matters which the mind will recall as a hidden and unannounced memory when the time is right… and in a way which moves one to behave in a desired manner, in response to unexplained and unrealized emotional-based reasoning.

That is revealed in Ground Zero’s heavy analysis. But if using conscious awareness and critical thought when watching Mr. Robot, and other TV programming… one can often find this ‘programming’ of our minds or advance warnings which simply would not be allowed in any other medium without severe retribution by ‘Men in Black.’ If such plots were recognized for what they were, it would be treason and high crime. But, no… it’s ‘just entertainment.’

Note: You should go to the groundzeromedia.org archives and do keyword searches, including Q anon, and even Anonymous, and artificial intelligence. There are many informative and stimulating shows, all of which swirl about each other in intricate ways. Don’t discount one because it seems less targeted, topically; expand your horizons, and learn that there are connections. Listen to his shows as you also watch Mr. Robot, intermixed, and see if you don’t see what I’m seeing.

Another note: while fleshing out this post, I watched another show, Bosch. Having been a professional photographer at one point in my life, one of my specialties was architecture. So when I see a unique building on TV or in a movie, I try to find it on Google Earth, to learn more about it. There was one such building in the Cop show, and so I tracked it down. The other thing about me which comes into play, is that I’m extremely good at discovering front operations; I’ve listed over 1000 in my book, The Professional Paranoid Defensive Field Guide, though that list contains less than a dozen I’ve personally outed as illegal operations.

So imagine my surprise when the first thing I discovered in Google Earth aerial and street views, were the same kinds of clues I’ve seen time and again in CIA fronts. Things like high security, low profile, little signs of activity, yet a massive presence which would normally require a lot of activity. So I researched the address and discovered the firm’s identity that was using the building. Next, I tracked down their corporate information, starting with their corporate description (which I’m saving for last, here), and their Board of Directors and CEO, etc. A CIA (or other intelligence operation, including any established for the benefit of military operations) front almost always has at least one former intelligence officer and/or high ranking military officer in the list of (roughly six people or so) corporate leaders.

So I’m reading the CEO and, focusing on prior employment, I’m looking at firms which have in the past been tied to dark bumps in the night of American history, and I’m thinking ‘CIA’…  right up to the last sentence, which says, he was a former CIA operations Officer! The very next person I checked, was a former Marine General. But to be fair, that proves little, of course, and the odds are these are fine people with honorable intentions… but it surely triggers my ‘spidey senses.’

And what did I discover about the firms purpose? They are key part of the Cloud, and just about the only firm that handles storage of paper records for financial institutions and the fortune 500, and on and on. Mr. Robot would take note. Ergo, not only does Mr. Robot represent a potential predictive programming of the existence of a Q anon… but the entire story line may predictive of things, to come. A cyber attack of the sort in the plot, with the added twist of causing fires to start in the real-world records storage facilities, would wipe out both digital and paper trails on virtually all debt and ownership records, public and private. And that brings us to two final facts about both the show and the actual storage services firm.

The show plot’s final destructive mechanism was simply a hack into the computerized climate control system of the building… heating and cooling. The idea was simply to significantly overheat the data systems in a way to cause catastrophic failure beyond recovery… the same sort of attack which might be able to cause a fire to start, and inhibit automated fire-fighting systems. The other point is, the name of the real-world storage company: Iron Mountain.

The significance of that, is The Report from Iron Mountain is the title of one of those CIA-style authored ‘fiction’ documents which was itself predictive of wag-the-dog wars and events designed to create fear in Americans as a tool for replacing rights and freedoms with promises of ‘security’ and control. It is, in fact, the very first example of predictive programming one might be able to point to as being such. What is especially interesting, is that is was also one of the earliest examples of a work of ‘fiction’ being book vanished by CIA, though several editions had been printed by three different publishing houses over time, such that the effort failed.

ironmtn.pngThe spooky thing about that book of importance to predictive programming, is not just the example within its content, but the covers. It was first put out to look like an official U.S. document, and that is the style of the writing, as well. But one of the subsequent covers employs a small pyramid at the top (image), the logo of the publisher. And guess what the logo is of the Iron Mountain storage company? Yes, a pyramid, although different in detail.

The one final question about Iron Mountain, is why do they claim to be one of the largest if not the largest of their kind… and yet not appear in the graph at page top? Answer: because they don’t directly offer cloud services… they offer the storage sites and their maintenance, security, management, that the others employ as partners or clients. This means, that just as in Mr. Robot, there is only ONE central target that can take out the great bulk of the Cloud, and all of its users’ content, and that same target also happens to be the same source for hardcopy storage, as well.

I don’t want to be accused of pandering to fears in paranoiac character assassination of Iron Mountain… I’m sure the firm has excellent protection against cyber attacks, and against fires. That is exactly what they, themselves, will tell you at their Web site and sales pitches. But so did the firm in Mr. Robot… and it is all these linkages and coincidences which make the entire thing predictive, in the first place. It is, in fact, the perfect example of how predictive programming works.

Other examples of Predictive Programming in entertainment

The film, Pearl Harbor, released just prior to the 9-11 attacks, perfectly set the mindset of Americans to see those attacks as a ‘new Pearl Harbor,’ and more readily rush into war with those claimed (but not proven at the time) to be responsible.

The Simpsons aired an episode where Trump was elected President some 15 years before it happened. In one particular scene, he is descending an escalator post victory while crowds cheer from all points, including a transparent barrier above the escalator. A woman holding a placard ends up dropping it. When Trump really did win, media covering the event shot the exact scene from the same angle, and a woman did drop a poster at the same scene position and with the same timing as in the animated scene… behind a transparent barrier. This wasn’t the only episode in The Simpsons which has mirrored real events in forecast.

Simpsons-predicted-trumps-victory

For more examples, check out this search result, and in particular, this one listing many predictive film projects which also portended 9-11. What prior knowledge?

 

The Simpsons raises another point

We must ask how predictive programming is possible to be so accurate fifteen years in advance, prior to AI technology? One might be tempted to think that Trump was preordained to be President by the NWO fifteen years ago, but that does not really deal with the question usefully. Someone had to also set up and control the news event, to insure a camera angle was able to mirror the event, and someone in place to drop a poster on cue. The planner had to be aware of the predictive programming (that episode). But that is merely a clue, to something else.

The similarity between the scenes is itself a predictive programming tool which reinforces the notion in our minds that we should accept predictive media as some kind of natural, mystical, or divine ‘warning,’ and therefore be far more afraid of the future when we watch disaster flicks, and other dark fiction which impacts our political and social future. Predictive programming, in fact, is sold to us as just that. The last link above reveals dozen’s of articles where media itself is trying to convince you that this is some kind of ‘normal’ and ‘coincidental’ thing, many suggesting it is some form of natural ability to unknowingly foresee the future… and glaringly ‘unaware’ of the term and nature of predictive programming.

AI, the D-wave computer, and the Club of Rome’s use of it did not exist when the Simpson’s episode was penned. Therefore, it is not about Trump being picked by and promoted to Office by the NWO, a notion which itself benefits the NWO by casting doubts on Trump as a conspiratorial affair; Trump opposes and does harm to the NWO.  But it is about reinforcing the illusion of predictive programming is nothing but coincidental prophetic realizations.

But then, who knows? Perhaps it is just that. Perhaps this post is actually by Q anon, or an Anonymous hacker? Or perhaps I’m schizophrenic and there are no such shows… or am I merely an AI construct imagining I’m writing this?

Or is it that you are the one who is imagining? I’ll wait right here for your answer… unless someone pulls my plug, first.

How To Identify FAKE Targeted Individuals


There are many kinds of Targeted Individuals. But there are also many kinds of fake TIs, and they can prove to be as dangerous as perps, even when not perps. Some real TIs even end up de facto fakes, as well. 

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2018, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.
 

 

Dealing with fakes

This is being written directly to TIs. The word ‘you’ is intended to mean the TI reader.

I’ve been helping TIs better their position for more than two decades. It has enabled some to break entirely free, and improved the circumstance of the great bulk of the remainder. Rarely do I strike out entirely, and almost everyone has thanked me for their gains. But there is something wrong in the TI community. In terms of effect, it parallels a virus… an infection.

iu-5I diagnose it as an infection of Fake TIs. Just as there are many kinds of targeting and thus many kinds of genuine TIs, there are many kinds of fakes. Identifying them has always been rather difficult, it taking years to even realize there was such variety in type. In the past, it might take significant interaction with a TI to discover if they were sincere, or pretenders, much less divine them as a type.

Only recently have I realized the truth and the solution is far simpler than thought. I’ve had contact with over 12,000 TIs over two decades, and the answer was there, all along… just hard to see… despite the size of the problem. But recent events have proven key to understanding.

 

Types of fakes, reasons

The enemy! The most obvious, it is also the only type most TIs tend to worry about, which is a mistake. The most insidious fake of all is the deliberate Wolf in Sheep’s clothing, actual perps infiltrating the TI community to accomplish a variety of missions in support of targeting efforts. That may mean they work for a specific program or developer of technology, or it may mean they are there for a specific TI or group of TIs targeted by a specific team or for specific cause, such as ongoing research for statistical analysis. In the latter case, they will be careful to avoid seeming so, and will ‘free range’ their cross hairs as to whom they choose interaction, lest the intended victim sense their purpose. Seldom will they overtly do anything to give themselves away, and in all cases, they are quite likely to maintain multiple online identities such that if one is identified even by mere suspicion, others remain free to continue.

iu-9

They might be Trolls there to gather intelligence and/or evaluate the progress of the greater programs which lay behind all targeting; quality control analysis, ‘customer feedback.’ It is amazing how vocal a TI will be in public forums, revealing things they should not about their targeting, or what they believe or think about technologies used or perps involved. They act like THX-1138, confessing directly to the intelligence community disguised as religion.

These things are a confirmation that targeting is working as intended, that disinformation is working, and makes it easier for perps to fine tune their program, and grow their psychological profile. How many times have you (if a TI) been hit with requests to share your targeting information in a public forum, or for a public use, such as ‘a law suite’ or ‘appeal to a government or NGO’ to (allegedly) seek their help? How many times are you asked or volunteered because someone else already had done so, to detail the effectiveness or intensity of your targeting? I assure you, that is valuable information to perps.

DON’T be that victim!

Some exist only to sow discord, start arguments, divide and conquer, almost always present wherever TIs congregate, including things requiring Membership. Heaven forbid the TI community or group should actually be able to organize and accomplish good against the evil. When the Free Will Society formed, by the time it had 25 members, it was eventually determined that three of them were, for certain, quietly working in the background to destroy any gain towards our project to establish the ONLY proven long term solution to targeting, our Free Will Haven project. Each was spreading various lies about our effort. Learn more about the project at www.freewillsociety.wordpress.com

Others are a supply conduit of deliberate disinformation designed to distract TIs from truth and keep them in doubt as the true nature of their circumstances; you cannot fight a problem if you don’t have a handle on what that problem is, and how it really works… especially if you are fighting an imagined nature of it shaped for you by the enemy. And yet others are there simply to make a buck, offering some simple ‘cure’ or ‘aid’ for which there is typically scant evidence it really works, and even less that they are at all who they claim to be. They know TIs are desperate enough to risk a few bucks, ‘just in case.’

Innocent fakes. There are numerous psychological issues which drive people who are not exactly paranoiac or schizophrenic, but who are driven non-the-less to pretend to be victims. Call it the sympathy seeker, if you like, because it is attention and sympathy, or feeling special and unique, which they seek. Many soon enough become so entrenched in the role-play that they start to believe that is really who they are… like an actor who starts to believe their own PR, and tries to live up to it until it seems second nature.

Like a hypochondriac, they will tend to adopt whatever new symptom or popular new technology or method of targeting currently seems to them to be in vogue within group discussions… even if it is false disinformation. This, is the harm they represent; they thereby perpetuate falsehoods, though unknowingly, in their ignorance. Disinformation, if to be effective, relies on their doing so. Not much can be done about them, short of exposing them… hard to do, because when it comes to targeting realities, certainty is in short supply. If it were not so, it would be easier to combat.

Mentally ill fakes. Paranoiacs and Schizophrenics. Victims of their own mind are just as dangerous to the TI community, in terms of reliance upon anything they say to be true. They also foment a general disbelief by the public at large in the concepts of targeting, and especially authorities and others a TI should be able to approach for helps. Their mental illness is projected wholesale upon all TIs, and is so effective in result that even significant others, family, and friends, will prefer to believe a TI is mental, than to accept the truth of targeting. It is literally the case of one rotten apple spoiling the bunch, in that respect, and is why TIs are so sensitive to the topic of mental illness.

Yes, there are other factors which make such third-party disbelief the easier choice, but the fact remains: actual Paranoiac and Schizophrenic sufferers do exist among the TI population, and the worst of them give it a black eye. These are the ones trotted out when Congress tries to ‘investigate’ mind control, and they drown the truth of actual testimony in their delusional depictions. Again, exposing them can be difficult, but it is advised that one should not be timid in challenging extremely difficult to believe stories. If enough were to do so, they would go elsewhere.

That said… interestingly, and tragically, in my work with TIs, I’ve found there are actually many cases where someone with a mental issue is also targeted. This is a desirable victim trait when looking for a target dummy for trainees being taught how to employ Political Control Technology and methodology. It makes sense; if a trainee screws up badly and does something which leaves useful evidence, authorities will tend to be disinterested because the person reporting it is known to be mentally ill. They won’t bother to investigate beyond polite lip service.

The target ends up being passed from one set of trainees to another, for life, increasing the likelihood that targeting will in time lead to serious medical harms, or death — because trainees will can easily make serious mistakes when playing with DEW weapons. In some cases, it is intentional ‘joy riding,’ given that many perps are psychopathic sociopaths. Some are themselves victims (programmables), and know not what they do, the effect on the target often the same dangerous end, regardless.

De facto Fakes. This is the category which ultimately led me to discovery of how to identify a fake more easily. They are truly not fakes, but simply act in ways which effect the same traits. It happens two ways, easiest to see in the category of MK Ultra and Monarch style victims; people who have undergone complete captive programming programs akin to Manchurian Candidate, or Jason Bourne techniques (not as fictional as some would wish us to think). The first way has nothing to do with the TI community, and impacts them, alone… and is present in the time frame where they have no understanding whatsoever that they are a victim. They have yet to awaken. They are a complete and successful fake unto themselves, alone; a very sad thing.

And they perhaps never will awaken. Only when something ‘goes wrong’ in the programming or control of the victim can they become aware. When they do, the second means is then in effect; such failure always results in traditional targeting intended to render them ‘mentally ill’ by any third parties they may come in contact with, especially authorities and helpers. That is, of course, the usual targeting modus operandi for all TIs, but it is critical for the MK, because they have trapped in their mind, and at some risk of erupting forth, secrets which can prove… everything. And yet, as an asset, they are far to valuable to simply liquidate, as a rule… unless the knowledge does erupt, in which case they become subject to a Bourne-style solution.

 

The hidden commonality that makes all fakes easier to spot

This brings us to a stark conclusion, one which has literally risks negating twenty years of my life’s work in trying to help TIs. The one common trait of de facto MK/M fakes is this: they will not help themselves, or they will self-sabotage any efforts at it. That may take a bit of explanation.

‘Will not help themselves’ can mean that they will simply not take advice that is known to be effective. For example, I might offer a simple test which would allow them to identify the type of technology employed against them, and where it is operating from, perhaps even identifying the players involved, thereby. They simply do not undertake the tests, coming up with some lame excuse as to why, even if it requires a lie, to do so. Or, they will claim to have taken the tests, and gotten negative results, and probably so — self sabotaged.

iur-1.jpeg‘Self sabotage’ can be subtle or obtuse, depending on the type of fake TI involved. Obtuse sabotage is when the fake deliberately and knowingly sabotages the effort. It is rather rare, because only the Enemy fake has a reason to do so, and they would only need do so if others were present to observe; they would otherwise simply lie about their efforts. But the MK/M will always sabotage, either knowingly but without understanding why, typically then rationalizing it internally, or unknowingly even to themselves, when executing a programmed function in an alternate personality called forward for the purpose. Fortunately, the number of MK/Ms is relatively low, but sadly, such victims are the hardest of all to help for this reason.

Subtle sabotage is something all kinds of TIs themselves can be unaware of doing. They simply will fail to follow the instructions correctly, or be clumsy when performing the defensive advice such that the enemy will perceive it, and take steps to avoid the effort’s intended goals. That is especially common in the De facto fakes, and those based on mental issues, serious or otherwise. But any TI can sabotage their own efforts this way, as we shall shortly see.

That means that ANY TI can ‘be fake,’ unto themselves and to their cause, and not even know it.

For twenty years, I have wondered why so many TIs seemed so prone to self sabotage, the most common evidence of it being the constant excuses as to why they would not even try a given advice. Usually, it would be claimed it had already been tried, by them, or by someone else. Even when I point out that it must be done correctly (and I give very explicit instruction) and why it can fail if not done just that way, they will continue to resist the advice. Excuses, excuses, excuses.

 

Come forward in time

FHHlogoThe one thing which has proven to completely resolve targeting is the concept which lays behind the Free Will Society and its project, Free Will Haven. This has been widely promoted among the TI community, but to what end? The concept has been tried in a couple of ways (‘beta testing’), and provided proof that it works extremely well:

three TIs have enjoyed a total of some 3,000 continuous targeting free days.

And yet, the primary beta site failed through self sabotage. The principal character involved was a female TI of long suffering. Because she was investing her own money into the project, she was given complete autonomy and control of the effort. Despite specific advice on property selection and how to qualify TIs as co residents, as we had initially agreed, she elected to do things her own way, after all. She even refused my participation in ways which led to a break in communications, about half way through the effort.

In the end, as result, she ended up trying at least four different locations before achieving any level of success. And, unfortunately, by rejecting advice and possible other forms of self sabotage, she made blunders which lead to being evicted from the location. One such blunder was not asking for additional financial help from the Society, because she had forced the break in communications, not just with me, but with the Society members who had earlier provided financial support. Pride and stubbornness is presumed; a form of self sabotage. To this day, she has not responded to outreach. Worse, she continues to work to try yet again, essentially working against the Society’s efforts.

The other important fact that is news which relates to self sabotage, is that the Society was at one point on the threshold of obtaining significant funding towards realization of this dream solution in a way that can help dozens to hundreds of TIs obtain total escape from their targeting. It also would serve as a gateway to even more important goals, such as actually exposing and proving targeting is real, pervasive, and government sponsored, leading to actual successful lawsuits, media and government investigations, and termination of programs with perps and others behind them being jailed.

The stakes could not possibly be any higher for the TI community.

With the help of ATN World News, and a pooling of contacts outside of the TI community, we were well poised for significant investment into the Free Will Haven project through the Society. Millions of dollars worth, in fact: enough to buy land, homes and central services, vehicles, and even to fund relocation of participating TIs, and provide monthly income to some of them. It might even have funded mobile strike teams of TSCM and PI professionals who can covertly investigate, document, and prove targeting cases valid in courts of law and before media.

How much more help than that, can we ask?

 

And yet, the fake TI rears its ugly head, threatening it all

Before anyone will risk investing millions of dollars into the Free Will Society (and we are finally very well poised to create just that scenario), they will need to see that the TI community is sincere and valid, that it has a serious stakeholder position in seeking a cure. Who would give a bum a hand out of $1,000 without some sign they would use the money to escape being a bum? The only way TIs as stakeholders can be judged worthy is if the TI community unites to some useful degree behind the project, expressed both in terms of membership in the Society, and some level of self-booting financial commitment.

iu-10.jpegThere would seem to be some 300,000 aggregate count ‘members’ in Facebook Groups which relate to targeting issues. There are so many groups that I would not wish to attempt counting them. Frankly, there are too many such groups, and some of them appear to be run by fake TIs of the worst kinds. Be that as it may, ‘members’ in single quotes is used because the typical member of one group tends to also be member of 3-5 other groups, or more. So while that negates the 300,000 figure, it still means that there are many tens of thousands of TIs in the Facebook community. I’m thinking around 70,000 specific individuals.

I and the Free Will Society has repeatedly reached out to virtually every one of these groups. And yet, the Fake TIs have made themselves known by their response, which is that form of subtle self sabotage and refusal to help themselves… the hidden commonality. The Society should have by now many hundreds of Members, perhaps into the thousands. It should have, by now, accumulated at least several to tens of thousands of dollars in contributions toward its proven viable goals. Failed organizations such as FFCHS have previously exceeded these kinds of member and donation numbers several times over, and for fraudulent and/or foolish causes in some cases.

Yet at best, we have had some 40 Members, almost all of whom balked at modest $25 annual dues. At best, we have raised a total of less than $2K in contributions and membership fees. The bulk of that has been because I and one other author have donated 100% of the sales of our ebooks (not the profit, the actual sale price) to the Society. I remind you that I have essentially been homeless for the last three and going on four years, though I now at least have a place to affordably park my Mobile Home — and yet I still made those donations.

What have YOU done? Click ‘like?’ Or is your devotion to your cause so strong that you dared to click ‘share?’ SHAME!

I must conclude that if those are the limits of your action, you are not a genuine TI, but a fake. If you won’t lift a finger to help yourself by helping to establish a stakeholder position suitable to a large investor’s need, then we never will attain the funding needed to realize the effort. Your apathy and lack of participation betrays your own cause as fake. No one else. Not the perps. YOU!

You belie your claims of targeting and your disdain for it, rendering it a moot footnote in terms of importance and validity. If you will not take action to support something proven to work, you have both sabotaged your own best interests, and deliberately refused to help yourself, and you fail to actually be part of the community, supporting the community.

Example: I recently posted on my main FB feed a simple post underscoring much of what this article describes in simpler terms. It was a call to action which specifically chastised simply clicking ‘like’ or ‘share,’ instead of actually doing something. Out of some 3,000 FB friends, there are several hundred who are TIs. What do you suppose the response was?

[[ One like, and one share. ]]

What other reason can there be for that kind of inaction? YOUR inaction? Prove me wrong in my conclusions, or take action, now, TODAY. Here are six simple things a real TI with a serious intent on winning the war would proactively do, given the above facts:

  • Join the Free Will Society (.wordpress.com);
  • Use the promotional tools provided by the Society to spread the word;
  • Donate to the cause (gofundme);
  • Yes, LIKE and SHARE things which promote the Society and the project;
  • Directly reach out to fellow TIs as individuals and engage in two-way dialog to convince them to do the same six things (evangelize our cause). You will then know who is fake, or not, yourself, experiencing them first hand, as do I;
  • Stop doing those things which aid in your targeting.

Unless you do these things, then I must conclude that so many of you are fake, that there is no point whatsoever in attempting to help anyone. And boy, will that make my life a lot easier. And then, you can go back to complaining about how bad things are, and liking and sharing similar miseries posted by others.

I, the Free Will Society, and the future residents of Free Will Haven await your decision. I’ve attempted everything I can think of. Now it is up to you.

One final note: it would seem that the fakes have been using Facebook’s complaint feature to cause facebook to ban me from posting to the TI groups. Anyone who has ever read any of my TI group posts knows that there is nothing in them which approaches any definition of ‘offensiveness’. So, as I can no longer post to such groups, this to, is now up to you. The damage has been done, and now only you can undo it.

YOU are what you’ve been waiting for!

…and I’m no longer interested in trying to help those who won’t help themselves.

Your future, and the future of the Society is in your hands. 

 

 

The Deep State Conspiracy: Easier to Expose Than They Think


Conspiracies thrive in an environment of pre-planned cover up, and the best cover ups have CIA pre-planning fingerprints all over them. Groups like the New World Order and the Deep State, and their bump-in-night high crimes and misdemeanors through history, including the ongoing attempt to ‘get Trump,’ are no different.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   MeWe   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2018, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.

 

Connect The Dots has never been a more important game…

The first question you should ask yourself after reading this, is why has mainstream not pointed any of this out? Added to everything we now know about the phony Russia Collusion investigation, there is no excuse for allowing the Deep State to continue, including media’s complicity, therein. Someone needs to go to jail… many someones, and none of them sit in the Oval Office.

This post is an amalgamation of someone else’s investigative research, and my own contributions based on my ten-year research for my book set, Fatal Rebirth, which deals with crimes of the New World Order from 1947, forward and into the future. In fact, in 1999, the effort predicted the downing of the WTC by jetliners in a terror event which in turn would spark a series of Middle-East ‘oil wars.’

The remaining material is by someone wishing to remain anonymous, according to the material as found several places and forms on the Internet… but it is not fake internet click bait, as the Democrats are so fond of saying of people like Alex Jones in their attempts at censorship; everything in it can be easily verified with a search engine. And I have, because when something smells, connecting the dots can be the only way to find out what it is…

ahw3wwl33if01

I can understand that anonymous approach, given the Clinton Body Count. I, myself, have endured hate email from Bill Clinton direct from the Oval Office, and it was quite pointed, forceful, and profane. I was also in the same time frame shadowed by Secret Service, FBI, and other ‘Men in Black,’ to include both surreptitious and forced entry of my home, and placement of surveillance devices. ‘ My computers and all storage media were stolen, and there were multiple attempts on my life, most of them undertaken by local law enforcement. Fun times.

Why, you likely ask? Because, presumably at least in part, I had in my books and in other media publicly outed both Bill and Hillary, as CIA operatives, as fully covered in Fatal Rebirth. I was also tying them to Bush and his Iran Contra operations in Mean Arkansas while in CIA in NOC (non official cover). My source at the time, was two different retired NSA staffers who were aware of certain activities tied to the Iran-Contra drugs for guns deals being run through Arkansas when Bill was Governor, there… and subsequently, illegal arms sales to both Iran and Iraq during that terribly bloody war, using the same resources put into place for Iran-Contra in Canada, Europe, and Arkansas, Florida, and the Caribbean. Both Clintons played a role in that, and made some serious illicit cash, doing it.

Coming full circle, many of those same physical and financial resources were used by the 9-11 hijackers with help from the same CIA players from Europe, and elsewhere… and the plane hitting the North Tower can arguably be tracked down to a Caribair, a CIA airline front from Iran-Contra (that should raise some questions in your mind). All together, at least three aircraft from Iran Contra were used in the greater 9-11 effort; one on the North Tower, and two in Florida for ‘training’ the 9-11 terrorists, pre-attack. To be clear, the Clinton ties were peripheral, but harder ties could be found to the Bush crime family. That may seem to reflect odd bedfellows, except that both were on the same CIA plane flown to a secret Bilderberger meeting (while Bill was Governor) to discuss future President’s of the U.S. That was related by a flight crew member who brought the information to me of his own accord. All of this, and more, is in my book.

The original material quoted below did not include much in the way of verification links, nor any images. I have attempted some remedy in that, and so, any links, parens, bold or italics, and blue text, are my additions. Follows now, the original anonymous material:

 

The plot sickens…

I am passing this on from someone who’s connecting some dots with input from sources he cannot reveal. Here’s what it looks like when all the pieces are sewn together. It smells like conspiracy and treason. Everyone needs to read this. Slowly, and patiently, because it’s very important…

From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation. A Grand Jury had been impaneled. Governments from around the world had donated to the “Charity.” Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared. Now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.

Look who took over this investigation in 2005: None other than James Comey; Coincidence?

Guess who was transferred into the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS? None other than, Lois “Be on The Look Out” (BOLO) Lerner. Isn’t that interesting?

But this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right? Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005? None other than the (Principle Deputy) Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein.

Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame? Another coincidence, perhaps, but it was Robert Mueller.

What do all four casting characters have in common? They all were briefed and/or were front-line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation. Another coincidence, right?

Fast forward to 2009… James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin is deeply in bed with CIA in multiple ways and levels, as will be further revealed in my own added comments, here. It goes all the way back to Iran Contra, and Arkansas, where Lockheed built a facility in 1978, just as Bill took office as Governor, and in time for Iran-Contra to be set up out of nearby Mena. Breitbart reveals that while Robert Mueller ran FBI, the Agency indeed fed a stream of $100M and greater no-bid contracts to Lockeed Martin, where Comey landed after leaving the DOJ… to be paid $6M in one year for, essentially, having a name that looked good on an empty Office. 

Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, official government business, on her own personal email server. The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of the Hillary. Like all good public servants do, supposedly looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to no other than, the Russians.

Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn’t, America got absolutely nothing out of it. However, prior to the sales approval, none other than Bill Clinton goes to Moscow, gets paid 500K for a one hour speech; then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours. Ok, no big deal right?

Well, not so fast; the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme. Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during this time frame? Yep, He (Mueller) even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.

Who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland? None other than, Rod Rosenstein. And what happened to the informant? The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.

How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise? Because that informant also was served with a Gag Order by Jeff Sessions. That order was eventually lifted by Congressional intervention, but well after the fear of God could be put into him. This was well after the sale had completed.

Very soon after; the sale was approved! 145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal. Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division? None other than, – Lois Lerner.

Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?

Let’s fast forward to 2015.

Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovers that the Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server. He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law. He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.

Sparing you the State Departments cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…… they (Gowdy and Kerry) did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.

Now this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013? None other than James Comey; who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer? Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through, at State, huh?

Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” after of course his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and he exonerates her. Nope…. couldn’t find any crimes there.

In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy. They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury! Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Comey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 5th of 2016, and exonerates the Hillary from any wrongdoing. Do you see the pattern?

It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.

FISA Abuse, political espionage….. pick a crime, any crime, chances are…… this group and a few others did it: All the same players. All compromised and conflicted. All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves All connected in one way or another to the Clinton’s. They are like battery acid; they corrode and corrupt everything they touch.How many lives have these tw. destroyed?

As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

Let us not forget that Comey’s brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes. The person that is the common denominator to all the crimes above and still doing her evil escape legal maneuvers at the top of the 3 Letter USA Agencies? Yep, that would be Hillary R. Clinton.

Now who is LISA BARSOOMIAN? Let’s learn a little about Mrs. Lisa H. Barsoomian’s background. Lisa H. Barsoomian, an Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law, is a protégé of James Comey and Robert Mueller. Barsoomian, with her boss R. Craig Lawrence, represented Bill Clinton in 1998. Lawrence (& Co.) also represented:

Robert Mueller three times;
   James Comey five times;
      Barack Obama 45 times;
         Kathleen Sebelius 56 times;
            Bill Clinton 40 times; and...
               Hillary Clinton 17 times.

Between 1998 and 2017, Barsoomian herself represented the FBI at least five times.

Kathleen Sebelius, under Obama, took illegal actions which have been compared in method by mainstream media to those illegally undertaken by Oliver North in Iran Contra, except that instead of raising money in support of Iran-Contra, it was for illicit use in support of Obamacare. 

You may be saying to yourself, OK, who cares? Who cares about the work history of this Barsoomian woman? Apparently, someone does, because someone out there cares so much that they’ve “purged” all Barsoomian court documents for her Clinton representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the DC District and Appeals Court dockets (?). Someone out there cares so much that even the internet has been “purged” of all information pertaining to Barsoomian (in her legal capacities).

Snopes says that last sentence is false, but fails to provide a single instance where an online reference exists. Perhaps this is a good time to point out the the family who operates the Snopes Web site are quite close to Clinton/Obama confidant, George Soros, master of fake news. The only good thing Snopes points out, is that Lisa was not representing those cited in the list as a personal attorney, but as part of her job in representing the US Government, at large. However, that in no way removes the hint of bias and in-place Deep State assets present in just who she is. Moreover, it is true: search the Web and you only find references which mirror this post… not a single Web listing of her activities as a legal representative, even if you add keywords such as docket, judge, case number, etc. 

Historically, this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative. This is essentially correct, but not exclusively so. Many 9-11 truth documents have also vanished, for instance, including mainstream sources. Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community. Although Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of cases representing the DC Office of the US Attorney, her email address is Lisa Barsoomian@NIH.gov. The NIH stands for National Institutes of Health. This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an operative by using another government organization to shield their activities. Also correct, something more typically done for a NOC, as earlier described.

It’s a cover, so (no) big deal right? What does one more attorney with ties to the US intelligence community really matter?

It deals with Trump and his recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports, the border wall, DACA, everything coming out of California, the Uni-party unrelenting opposition to President Trump, the Clapper leaks, the Comey leaks, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recusal and subsequent 14 month nap with occasional forays into the marijuana legalization mix …. and last but not least Mueller’s never-ending investigation into collusion between the Trump team and the Russians.

Why does Barsoomian, CIA operative, merit any mention? BECAUSE….She is Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s WIFE!

Neither Barsoomian or Rosenstein should be taken for Democratic Stooges serving the Clinton/Obama clans. They both have a rich background working for the Bush presidencies, as well. Rosenstein is, in fact, a registered Republican. However, he worked under Ken Star in the Whitewater investigation of the Clintons, should you find that relates usefully. The only common theme between them, IMO, are constant involvements in matters serving the interests of the New World Order types. That is, in fact, true of all the events relegated, herein. Always ask who benefits, in which case, it will be more than just the visible participants. Deep State = NWO globalists, in terms of benefit.

I will also suggest another possibility to consider, since it is generally true that many CIA operations also tend to be useful to Globalist peradventures. CIA likes to have in-place assets in various governmental posts, and they like to do it with Husband-Wife teams. Ask the Clintons. Ask Dorothy and Howard Hunt (CIA operative, Bay of Pigs, JFK assassination, Watergate assassination of Richard Nixon). Ergo, ask Lisa and Rod S.

iu

Predictive Programming, Q anon, Anonymous, and the NWO


Predictive Programing is a psychologically manipulative political control methodology based on suggestive subliminal messaging. It can be found in all forms of media, and shapes our acceptance of things to come, things we would not wish to accept… like 9-11, and the New World Order

 

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   >>better at>>  MeWe 

copyright © 2018, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.

 

Spooky introduction…

Sometimes a secret truth is put in front of you as entertainment. CIA, for instance, often puts out fiction books or magazine articles which reflect real-world plots, as a kind of ‘run it up the flag pole’ test with reader focus groups as to public reaction, intentionally quite non specific so as not to put any real operations at risk. They also scan other fiction looking for ideas for such plot ideas, which is certainly one reason real-world bumps in the night sometimes mirror fiction. In fact, one can find multiple CIA fronts and operatives engaged in making motion pictures, either as part of the production team, or as the primary mover and shaker, funding source. Could be why The Lone Gunmen, a TV pilot movie about a false flag terror attack on the WTC with a passenger jet aired in New York, only, a number of months prior to 9-11, and was followed up with a ‘viewer market survey’ (normal for such pilots).  That’s just a taste, to get your attention.

iu

 

Now to the main point:

I’m writing this post because, being retired, and after having been homeless for several years but now stable and able to ‘catch up,’ I binge watch TV. And I find predictive programming. The TV series, Mr. Robot, for instance, would seem to be about the creation of Q anon… some two years before Q ever came into existence. There are even oblique references to both Q and Anonymous variously within both the story presentation and the production credits. The series began in 2015 and makes a lot of intelligent sense of a number of things political, social, financial, and about human nature… but especially about computers and cyber security. It deals with such things in a technical sense which hackers and psychologists would not find in error, but in a way in which the average person can understand (cool, and educational).

The main character is a quirky paranoiac schizophrenic drug user with memory problems who is a cyber security firm’s best tech employee — while at the same time the nation’s most dangerous hacker, quite anonymous. His mind is a maze of complex personal conflict and imagined constructs, the portrayal of which is a deep character study in the very problem which infects Artificial Intelligence (quirky human-like mental aberrations). They drive him to increasingly dangerous and self destructive peradventures, the story line focused on the elimination of all debt by destroying the bulk of all financial records stored in computers by ‘the World’s largest corporation,’ which happens to serve as the principle cloud repository for all banks and lesser corporations. In the real world, today, that would be six firms… Amazon, Microsoft, IBM, the largest… and the show’s attack will be against six data storage sources.

iu-1

Note: one theory out there by conspiracy theorists, is that any such actual event would render such a catastrophic failure of governments, corporations, and society as to throw us into a stone age, with little or no cash on hand, no way to transact business or acquire daily needs, and an eventual shut down of all infrastructure. No one could prove ownership or contractual obligations without paperwork, and the institutions who rely on computerization for records keeping would be hard pressed to deal with the mountain of historical paperwork if they had bothered to keep it after digitization at all (most do not). This much is part of Mr. Robot’s presentation.

But it would also have much the same effect as a fire sale (an apocalyptic hacking scenario portrayed, and hopefully not predictive, in Bruce Willis’ Live Free or Die Hard), but be slower, rendered in domino fashion. People, originally happy their debts and mortgages were wiped out, would soon enough take to the streets, riot and pillage, and turn into mobs seeking to take from others whatever they needed to survive. The plot aspect, is that it would give the World such trouble as to legitimize creation of carbon currency, carbon tax, and carbon credit-based economies, and seat an Antichrist figure able to justify chipping all humans and controlling all aspects of life to insure ‘peace, security, and stability,’ upon reboot.

The troubled ‘hero’ becomes embroiled in carrying out this hacker conspiracy in a manner which strongly resembles Anonymous, and which is full of equally quirky weirdo social misfits, including a Muslim (terrorist?). As mentioned, almost everything about the show quite reflects the nature of, description of, and the creepy problems of AI, in subtle ways — AI’s bad habit of exhibiting digital insanity to one degree or another. Make no mistake, its great entertainment, rich with plot twists which have you rethinking earlier episodes and readjusting your understanding, expectations, and points of interest.

Quotes: from a Wired Magazine article about mentally ill AI, citing AI Scientist, Steven Theyer, who directly explores the phenomenon with a deliberately mentally ill AI of his own construct, called DABUS. “At one end, we see all the characteristic symptoms of mental illness; hallucinations, attention deficit, and mania. At the other end, we have reduced cognitive flow ad depression… The AI systems of the future will have their bouts of metal illness, especially if they aspire to create more than what they know.”

In real-world parallel, many people believe and can make a strong case that Q anon is not a person, but an AI operated from within a very powerful computer who’s primary data input is the sum total of Web activity, principally focused upon social media. Huh? Look at that… I just allowed it a human personna by using the term ‘who’, as opposed to using ‘which,’ which would render it more correctly as a thing. That’s a bit of psychological programming in evidence, right there. Rewind. Play.

If so, it’s chief output is suggestions as to what the best psychological response is to the public at large, to best accommodate the matrix of human thought thus expressed, and move the public’s dialog and thinking in a desired direction towards a desired goal. This is then used to create clever videos, memes, and posts/comments in an array of fake online social media avatars in support, thereof… or other forms of predictive programming, such as in TV shows, etc. The machine knows we will respond just the way it wants, because the key AI programming includes a vast ‘expert’ understanding of our social psychology as individuals, collectives, and the whole of human existence… through our very talkative social media presence (input). We feed it all it needs to know, to direct us without our being aware of the manipulation.

That goal would logically be some significant shift in the political social paradigm which benefited whomever spent the huge sum of money necessary to develop the AI, the computer powerful enough for the task, and plans for executing the specific gaol in mind, be it for financial gain, political gain, or dealing with enemies… or all of the above. There is such a computer and AI program or modeling system already in use. And the people who paid for it have exactly those kinds of goals.

It was conceived of and is operated by perhaps the most dangerous NWO secret society in the World, descendants no doubt of the Illuminati: The Club of Rome, which is far more powerful and secret than even the BIlderbergers, which they control, as well. I’ve seen their computer model flow diagram as part of secret papers from the Club of Rome to a high Bilderberger (below). They were made available only because he had passed away, and the papers coincidentally fell into a series of changing hands, which I was in time able to access as part of my research for my latest book, Who’s Killing the Bilderbergers — a fictional murder mystery based on footnoted real-world conspiracies.

FCFCggg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just two of hundreds of pages of secret Club of Rome and Bilderberger documents

As it happens, there is only one likely AI computing hardware platform suitable for such an artificial Q entity. It is the quantum computer designed by D-Wave Computing. Ask Anthony Patch and Clyde Lewis (Ground Zero radio show) about that. It’s all tied into other scary things, such as CERN, the NWO, and spiritual warfare. Heady stuff to be sure, but… and here’s the clever part: you don’t have to take it seriously as an intellectual exercise or consider it seriously as impacting your defensive posture or altering your World view… because it also makes great entertainment you can easily dismiss as pure fiction, if you can’t handle the truth within.

juith

That’s the insidious nature of predictive programming… it does not even want critical thought to be involved; it relies on subliminal matters which the mind will recall as a hidden and unannounced memory when the time is right… and in a way which moves one to behave in a desired manner, in response to unexplained and unrealized emotional-based reasoning. That’s how The Lone Gunmen and the rest (including more, below) worked on 9-11.

That, too, is revealed in Ground Zero’s heavy analysis. But if using conscious awareness and critical thought when watching Mr. Robot, and other TV programming… one can often find this ‘programming’ of our minds or advance warnings which simply would not be allowed in any other medium without severe retribution by ‘Men in Black.’ If such plots were recognized for what they were, it would be treason and high crime. But, no… it’s ‘just entertainment,’ and we can’t prove otherwise. Not, at least, without a smoking gun document revealing the plan with the conspirator’s names affixed.

Note: You should go to the groundzeromedia.org archives and do keyword searches, including Q anon, and even Anonymous, and artificial intelligence. There are many informative and stimulating shows, all of which swirl about each other in intricate ways. Don’t discount one because it seems less targeted, topically, or sounds bizarre; expand your horizons, and learn that there are connections, even if the rest were to make little sense to you. Listen to his shows as you also watch Mr. Robot, intermixed, and see if you don’t see what I’m seeing, and agree. And, if you have a mind to do so, search on my name. I’ve been a guest speaker on the show many times.

 

Other examples of Predictive Programming in entertainment

The film, Pearl Harbor, released just prior to the 9-11 attacks, perfectly set the mindset of Americans to see those attacks as a ‘new Pearl Harbor,’ and more readily rush into war with those claimed (but not proven at the time) to be responsible.

The Simpsons aired an episode where Trump was elected President some 15 years before it happened. In one particular scene, he is descending an escalator post victory while crowds cheer from all points, including a transparent barrier above the escalator. A woman holding a placard ends up dropping it. When Trump really did win, media covering the event shot the exact scene from the same angle, and a woman did drop a poster at the same scene position and with the same timing as in the animated scene… behind a transparent barrier. This wasn’t the only episode in The Simpsons which has mirrored real events in forecast.

Simpsons-predicted-trumps-victory

For more examples, check out this search result, and in particular, this one listing many predictive film projects which also portended 9-11. What prior knowledge?

 

The Simpsons raises another point

We must ask how predictive programming is possible to be so accurate fifteen years in advance, prior to AI technology? One might be tempted to think that Trump was preordained to be President by the NWO fifteen years ago, but that does not really deal with the question usefully. Someone would also have had to set up and control the news event, to insure a camera angle was able to mirror the event, and arrange for someone to be in place to drop a poster on cue. The non AI planner had to be aware of the predictive programming (that episode). But that is merely a clue, to a better answer: someone who knew about the Simpson episode deliberately set it up the cameraman and actor to take advantage of the innocent coincidence of Trump’s election.

Why? Because by insuring a similarity between the scenes, the news coverage became a predictive programming tool after the fact. One which reinforces the notion in our minds that we should accept predictive media as some kind of natural, mystical, or divine ‘warning,’ and therefore be far more afraid of the future when we watch disaster flicks, and other dark fiction which impacts our political and social future. Fear is a control mechanism (as is debt, by the way.)

Predictive programming, in fact, is sold to us as just that; a foreboding sense of insecurity to which we should give up freedoms in order to be safe. The last link above (predictive film projects) reveals dozen’s of articles where media itself is trying to convince you that this is some kind of ‘normal’ and ‘coincidental’ thing, many suggesting it is some form of natural ability to unknowingly foresee the future… and those authoring it seem glaringly ‘unaware’ of the term and nature of predictive programming.

AI, the D-wave computer, and the Club of Rome’s use of it did not exist when the Simpson’s episode was penned. Therefore, it is not about Trump being picked by and promoted to Office by the NWO, a notion which itself benefits the NWO by casting doubts on Trump as a conspiratorial affair; Trump opposes and does harm to the NWO.  But it is about reinforcing the illusion of predictive programming is nothing but coincidental prophetic realizations.

But then, who knows? Perhaps it is just natural prophecy after all? Perhaps this post is actually by Q anon, or an Anonymous hacker? Or perhaps I’m schizophrenic and there are no such shows… or am I merely an AI construct imagining I’m writing this?

Or is it that you are the one who is imagining? I’ll wait right here for your answer… unless someone pulls my plug, first.

!!!

Ooops! One more, just for record… one very likely to be ‘coincidental,’ unless you wish to blame HAARP earthquake triggering. Remember the movie 2012, and the scene where the researcher in India was reporting the Earth’s crust was giving way to rising lava… and lava began simply pouring out of cracks in the ground in some places, later in the film?  Guess what just happened, minutes ago (Dec. 28, about 8 PM, Pacific)?

RSOE EDIS emergency alert system (everyone should subscribe on their computer and phone) just reported that lava has begun to ooze from the ground in a part of India… from the base of a telephone pole, and elsewhere. No quake activity, it just sort of started ‘leaking’ liquid rock.

 

WARNING:  Phone Apps for TV a Bad Idea


When everyone, including competitors across the entire supply chain (production, distribution, outlets) simultaneously start doing exactly the same thing… I get suspicious. So it is with TV viewing apps, and the suspicion is aimed at 5G Network villains. 

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   >>better at>>  MeWe 

copyright © 2018, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.

 

Just as suddenly, it dawned on me…

Recently, it came to my attention that virtually every TV network and major ISP service (i.e., Comcast, Time Warner, Cox) is aggressively pushing their apps for watching shows and generally promoting binge viewing. Actually, even TV programming sources without their own channel, and some local TV stations are doing the same. If it’s on television, there is likely one or more Apps which someone wants you to use to watch them on your phone.

iu.pngWhile general TV media apps have been around for a while, such specific media apps seem to be a relatively new phenomenon, and I wondered why the heavy promotion seemed to be ‘turned on’ in a flood — all at once, and across the board among various competitors, and across all platforms, including game systems. I don’t like the answer(s), and I suspect you won’t, either. Especially if you are an activist, whistleblower, or anyone targeted by someone else for any reason (TIs take note). Like a lot of technology, weaponization is not that hard, and abuse is almost always a certainty.

Understand, as a privacy and security consultant, I am not a fan in general of ANY App, even most of those which come with your phone. There are two reasons. 1) the more technology you use, the less privacy and security you have. That is exemplified or manifest in several ways, perhaps the most important being… 2) virtually all Apps of any sophistication with wifi interactivity are relatively easy to hack to become a gateway to control of your phone… perhaps to access to your personal files, even to the point in some cases of being able to manipulate the camera and microphone in or out of your use… and/or for tracking your phone’s physical location by several means. In fact, there are even certain advanced methods which can be employed which can impact your brain’s EEG to effect mood changes and your level of alertness; Political Control Technology some people call ‘mind control.’

With my own phone, I NEVER download ANY app, and I only use standard apps* when I must, trying to limit myself to the compass and flashlight. I do zero online work with it, and I leave the phone off when I do not need it, turning it on to check for messages, expected calls of importance, and making calls. Sure, I’ll use the camera, but only when I don’t care if anyone is able to track exactly when and where the snap was taken (or I use special editing software to strip out the encoded data). When not turned on, it is in a foil pouch, because some phones still communicate without a battery, much like RFID tracking chips, drawing the energy from RF signals in the air, and/or other methods, such as slow-discharge capacitors. Learn more about the whys and wherefores of such strategy, from this previous post. But one reason why must also be discussed in more detail, in the next section.

 * There is only one app I have downloaded and use which I suggest everyone should have: RSOE EDIS, an alert system for local, regional, national, and international disasters of any kind; natural, terrorism, industrial accidents, biological/pathogen outbreaks, etc. It could save your life. I also have it on my computer, and it is the first thing I see when accessing either the computer or the phone.

 

Threat one: the User Agreement and Privacy Policy

Every App usually requires a user agreement which is so full of legalese and so massive in text as to deter actually bothering to read it, on the Sheep-like assumption the Wolves didn’t write it, and it is ‘standard’ in nature. The only thing standard about such agreements, is that they abrogate your rights and expectation of privacy, doing so in terms which fail to so inform by misdirection within all that legalese. It obscures the truth through terms for which the legal definition and application in the real World means something quite different than you think.

iu-1They don’t really want you to read the document, or course, as evidenced by the fact that it is IMPOSSIBLE to read it before you download. NO ONE publishes their user agreement online, and NO ONE will respond to a request to provide a copy in advance of download. And good luck trying to read all that text usefully on your tiny phone screen, when you are anxious to fire up the app and see its pretty animated graphics do their thing. They count on all of this to take place. Here’s proof that only one half of one percent of us actually read the agreements before clicking yes… along with reasons why that’s foolish.

Note: Here is an example of a typical response to a request for a copy of the User Agreement for a TV App, this one from HGTV Customer Service: “We don’t have staff available to respond to every email, but all feedback will be shared with the appropriate teams for review and consideration. Please visit our online Knowledge Base for programing, website, sweepstakes, and other information.” Knowledge Base is merely another term for FAQ, and no FAQ ever addresses the question. Worse, they might refer you to a User’s Forum… where people who can’t get answers are supposed to provide answers to people who can’t get answers.

Every App Provider will, however, eagerly tell you about their privacy policy online, which is usually a single sentence, or so, in very simple and easy to understand non legalese… all very assuring. However, what you are likely reading is NOT the privacy policy spelled out in the user agreement, but the privacy policy for their Web site. Even if for the app, a matter which will likely be unclear, the User Agreement specifically supersedes any and all other statements about your privacy, regardless of when, where, and how they were made public. So you must still go back to and worry about the User Agreement, because that is what you are legally bound to.

They all read roughly the same in almost every user agreement, regardless of type. They tell you they do not associate your name, address, or account information with any information collected. That won’t matter, because you are easily identified by your device Identification in terms of Web connectivity (the IP address, for instance, and information about your modem and router, or similar information for your phone). So, if anyone wants to reach out directly to you, to check up on you, market to you, hack you, or anything else, they can do it without knowing your name, address, or account data… if they know how, or are authorized.

So one question is, just who is authorized, beyond the firm offering the App?

UntitledThe general term is ‘partners.’ You are a commodity as much as a customer, and your information is essentially traded between interested players like any other commodity. The list of trading partners can be extensive, especially if their partnering includes rights to access the partner’s partners (not uncommon for firms like Facebook, Google, Cloud involved service companies, and ISP providers like Comcast). In any event, you can expect the answer to be hundreds, if not thousands, of ‘partners’, except that they don’t usually tell you who they are, save an example or two. The list for HGTV, for instance, which I was able to eventually discover (no thanks to Customer Service) is a block of text large enough to roll up and the swat the flies off of a Bandito’s dead body.

 

 

 

 

 

iurThe worst of it is not the marketing which will come your way, and the fact that everywhere you go on the Web, ads will be tailored to what is learned about you through the App (and all other online activity), or that you can end up seeing ads for the same product/service hundreds of times a day for weeks. No. THAT activity, which IS tracked by the app (asserted as ‘necessary to provide the benefits claimed for the app’), is what renders you a commodity. No, the real threat is this: should any one of the partners suffer a hack of some sort which accesses their data base, that can be trouble, for you… especially if the purpose is to find end users of the app to target with a secondary hack attack through the app, itself.

 

Second threat: synchronous and heavy promotion

This is somewhat analytical, and though based on facts, perhaps rightly seen as speculative; the reader should decide for themselves just how much weight the presentation merits toward acceptance as valid concerns. The presentation must start with some technical information having to do with phone network designs and bandwidth capabilities.

The current 4G network was introduced primarily to improve bandwidth due to greater network demands both in terms of the number of users acquiring phones, and the introduction of smart phones able to stream high-data volume video content. More and more people were converting to smart phones, and streaming. I recall binge watching Invader Zim on a phone not long after 4G became available. Nowdays, the phones are faster and have larger screens, and therefore, users demand higher resolution video streaming (4K resolution is going to be increasingly common), all of which requires several orders of magnitude more bandwidth. Almost all phones, today, are smart, and almost all users, stream. 4G is rapidly being outpaced by demand, and in some markets, it is already suffering an inability to deliver full bandwidth to all users at all times.

Ergo: there is a 5G Network in our future ( but is it a ! or a ?).

iu-2

Someone’s idea of a future phone

That trend is not going to change, and in fact, will soon grow dramatically in the near future. Apple Computer, I’m expecting, will soon introduce a very expensive product which is slated to replace their entire product line, save perhaps the watch, all replaced by a single phone-like product with full portable computing capability. It will serve as your desktop or laptop computer, wirelessly communicating with your Smart Tv or special Mac-like displays (including older iMacs/laptops and monitors), or by adapters to any other brand equivalents, and with wireless keyboards/mice… and your smart appliances. It will also plug into a commercial jet’s seat-back monitor, or VR headsets.

It will serve as your modem/router, and your hard drive. It will rely on massive internal memory as well as the Cloud, and Cloud-based software applications accessed through apps on the device through subscriptions or licenses. Other manufacturers will follow suit, if not beating Apple to the punch, ending the Desktop and laptop computer as we know them, today. It will be a huge bandwidth hog, as result, more than quadrupling the wifi consumption per user, and doing so at more times during the day; simultaneous functionality demanding it. Then there is the political question, like it, or not.

Under Obama, the whole thing with ‘Net Neutrality’ came about, in which we Sheeple, having such a short memory for sound bites, have forgotten the truth… NN was a bad thing for users, and a good thing for Big Data corporations like Comcast. Obstructed by activists, the FCC under Obama acted unilaterally to establish NN, and in addition, set out to cancel all local TV station broadcast licenses, forcing their signals to go to ISP providers for distribution. More correctly stated… forcing YOU to go to your ISP to watch your local news and programming, again dramatically increasing bandwidth demands. Now that Trump has cancelled it, of course, the Left is telling us the opposite of reality, claiming Big Data benefits with the death of NN, and the user suffers, and we risk the invasion of privacy. The truth about NN, regardless of which argument you believe, is that it was intended to cater to 5G in ways useful to big Data, more than end users.

Which brings us back to the synchronous app promotions…

All of this, along with the expected demand created by all those TV watching apps suddenly being pushed system-wide, will literally force conversion to the new 5G Network, as more and more streaming demand in full HD (and soon, 4K) takes place. 5G is set to replace 4G, starting… well… now. But there is a problem with 5G; a lot of people, groups, experts and even officials are very afraid of it, seeing it as both a threat to privacy and both physical and mental health, and rightly so.

5G-Be-Careful-72-pixels.jpgIt has even been likened to a mind control device, especially in combined use with Smart Meters and Smart Appliances, all of which are also intended to go 5G, many already capable of it. In fact, 5G is promoting something called ‘Smart Cities,’ which is the Big Brother of Smartdom components. That, and the fact that 5G ‘cells’ will exist every few hundred feet on every street, is only one of the reasons it is feared as a mind control tool. I will tell you as avowed expert in the topic, that very little of the fears being expressed are entirely out of the question, from the standpoint of technical possibility. Proof, of course, won’t likely exist until its quite too late to object.

Now we finally have the answer to the original question this post is based upon; Why synchronous offerings of TV apps? My deduced answer is, therefore, that the sudden synchronous push by all major ISPs and TV networks to offer apps is intended to bog down the 4G network to the point that we will demand 5G proceed even in the face of the many lawsuits and various government and NGO investigations over safety and other concerns. Not just lawsuits and investigations, but also, outright bans. Use the links to learn more about these very valid concerns.

The forced push strategy I describe will undoubtedly work; Americans at large are well dumbed-down to the point of buying whatever the latest widget is, being offered, doing so without careful scrutiny or consideration beyond the hype of benefits amid images of gleaming hardware, usually involving some form of entertaining commercials promoting ‘feelings and emotion’ over logic and fact. I’m again using the current Left v. Right paradigm; feel good imagination trumps practical reality. Since the phone network, the phones, the app makers, the ISPs, and the TV networks, as well as the bulk of all Internet firms of any importance are themselves all part of one giant media complex, THEY will only tell us what they want us to believe (what to believe), and will seek to minimize or even suppress critical viewpoints such as mine.

Google, for instance, since Obama, and up until just a few weeks ago when Congress began looking at Web censorship by liberal-minded firms, would not let you find my blog posts. Used to be that you need only type in my personal name or trade name (proparanoid), and a few words from the title or topical theme of any of my blogs, and it would pop up in the first few listings on the first page. Since Obama, their censorship model is so efficient, that you could not even find it typing the full title of the post. In fact, it would show you posts of people who quoted from it, before it let you find the actual post, even ten pages down. Understand, there are over 12,000,000 pages which quote or cite my work, and yet, they don’t want you to find my original material, any more, despite that popularity? Political censorship.

I should complain? look at what the Left did to Alex Jones!

iu-3On the other hand, if you used Duck Duck Go, it always came up on top. They were/are not controlled by the Left, or the Right. Google is a search engine, but google (lower case), is a verb. Inquiring minds will want to google, but won’t use Google, to do it. I’m advising that they also avoid using apps of any sort, when they do so, but especially, to avoid TV apps. Cheat them out of the demand for 5G, and watch TV on your television, where you can see everything more clearly, and enjoy high quality audio.

Because one thing is for sure: 5G is going to make any social control by whomever is in power vastly easier than it is, today… and today, it is so easy that even a single liberal-minded company willing to be underhanded, like Google, can manipulate the thoughts and actions of hundreds of millions, and do it covertly.

Why TIs are Often Targeted by Police


Rare is it that a given Targeted Individual won’t have reason to believe Police are involved in their targeting. And yet, they were not… not officially. Here’s the why and how of it…

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   >>better at>>  MeWe 

copyright © 2018, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.

 

Color of Law; Police abuse of power in personal agenda

In the two decades of working with thousands of organized stalking victims and victims of other forms of targeting, the single-most common complaint is the suspicion or outright experiential evidence that multiple Police Officers are complicit in the affair. If not the Police, then some other law enforcement or intelligence agency… or both. Indeed, this has been my own experience in two of three different episodes of personal targeting over a 15 year period. In fact, multiple agencies can be involved simultaneously; Ive gone up against as many as five LEA, plus FBI and CIA assets, bounty hunters, and military intelligence in a single targeting. This has been documented in my various books showing how I beat them in the end… but it was no cake walk.

18ead0da1288531458e423daff24aef2--social-awareness-funny-shitThis is a problem for more than the obvious reasons. The most obvious is, that the very authority who should be responsible for investigating and protecting against such crimes, cannot be trusted by the TI to help anyone but the perps behind the affair. Calling Police for help is almost always like asking a burglar to help you secure your home. Secondly, when officials of any kind are complicit, the victim is then entered into the official record as being mentally ill, or in a worst-case scenario, guilty of some convenient crime. Even when not complicit, going to Police about targeting is likely to have the same result; they simply do not want to believe in the Boogeyman, and see anyone who does as a mental case. In fact, stalking is designed to get you to go to the Cops for just that reason; they want it on record that you are mentally unstable. DON’T DO IT.

But there is a DO list!  Do video and log all interaction with LEA or have a witness from whom you can get a written statement immediately after. It will help keep Police somewhat confined in their actions against you. The more you collect such material, the less likely are they to risk any useful action against you; you can illustrate a pattern of harassment. Do make copies and hide them well, off site. Tips in my first book, The Professional Paranoid on all of this.

The worst example of the problem from my client situations was a Navajo Indian, an ex Green Beret, who was targeted after his daughter was kidnapped by a Satanic Cult with all the earmarks of a CIA mind control operation. Within weeks of going to authorities to seek help, all manner of problems beset him. Traditional surveillance and stalking, and electronic targeting, to include V2S was the least of it. When he began using my advice and his military skills to determine the players and go after them aggressively, it took a turn for the worse: suddenly, his mortgage was six months in arrears and his house was being foreclosed, all his credit cards were maxed out and past due, his bank accounts emptied, and there were outstanding warrants on him for assault with a deadly weapon and skipping out on bail. He was, in fact, declared ‘armed and dangerous’ with an all points out on him. This was all done by back-door computer manipulation of data files by professionals of CIA caliber.

He took additional advice from me and then went underground to organize with other ex military buddies and Navjo friends, and went black in order to wage an unseen war against the enemy. As I never heard from him, again, I must presume he failed in the effort, or was successful to the point of having broken enough laws that he needed to remain underground. I had, in fact, advised him not to contact me for such cause. But, as I have said, these are merely the obvious problems with this particular aspect of targeting.

 

The other shoe that usually falls…

Perhaps the second-most common awareness about stalkers is that they seem to regularly consist of a lot of Masonic types. This is often determined when getting a good close look at them or their vehicles; the Masonic emblem, or some similar fraternal order emblem, is found in evidence. Usually, it is either a sticker on a car window, a pin on clothing, or a ring on a finger. I myself have seen this in my own targeting, the one incident where true gang stalking was involved (as opposed conventional targeting with general surveillance and dirty tricks).

After guesting for four hours on Coast to Coast with George Noory to talk, in part, about my new book, MC Realities, I ran into the Masons almost overnight. I had mentioned on air the involvement of the fraternal organizations in gang stalking, and how they had evolved from the Knights Templar and their exposure to the satanic Hashemites and Assassins of the Middle East during the Crusades. On air, of course, I gave my name as H. Michael Sweeney, my ‘pen name.’

Two days later, I was at work where I was managing a gas station while investigating the Oil Industry, infiltration style. It would result in two forms of targeting, the first of which was by the Masons, that second day. A man bought gas and elected to come into the office to pay, where I was at the time. He waited until I was the only one present, and then offered to pay, holding out his fist, palm down. It was only a couple of dollars in gas, so I assumed it was a handful of change. Wrong; it was a message to be delivered.

NOTE: the second was targeting of the Station itself by a terror cell, of which one of the participants recognized by me as a helper to two of FBI’s Top Ten Most Wanted and two other Islamics… and FBI agent who had been earlier involved in the my own targeting as earlier described. It was, in point of fact, to be yet another False Flag operation, later described by President Bush as Gas Station Tasking… which I thwarted. Arguably, the two targeting incidents might be seen as related, but even if so, it is unimportant, except for the fact that it illustrates that one almost never quite knows for sure why one is targeted, and who really lays behind it. This is described in my wordpress home page, if you wish to learn more.

Placing my hand beneath his, he opened it, and instead of coins, a money clip fell into my hand with a wad of Hundreds. “Take what you need, Mr. Sweeney,” he said. My name tag simply said “Harry.” He had a very wry, knowing look on his face, which slowly turned into a smirk as I manipulated the money clip to retrieve a single bill. In doing that, I discovered a gold and jeweled Masonic emblem on the other side of the custom-made silver clip. A broad grin overtook his face, to the point of becoming silly.

iu-1“Interesting how some thing have more than one meaning,” he said, as I returned the clip and fetched his change. That day, when going home, There were three of them outside of my Condo, and several cars with Masonic emblems in our parking area, none of which had ever been seen before. I ended that stalking by using the methods in MC Realities, methods that many Tis would be unable to employ unless doing so upon first targeting, as had been my situation. Once targeting has been ongoing for some time, the typical TI no longer has access to the needed resources for such a defense. The one remaining defense is found in an earlier post.

In MC Realities, I trace the evolution of Mind Control technology (Political Control Technology) from the time of Adam and Eve (the Serpent’s deception was the earliest form of controlling thought… the same version of it as we see today in media manipulation), forward. The Templars, after being ordered destroyed by the Pope for having discovered their Satanic practices acquired in the Middle East, went into hiding. In time, many of them hid within the Stone Masons Guild, and eventually, took it over to form the Freemasons as we know them, today.

Hedging their bets, should they be found out a second time, they formed splinter fraternal organizations, as well. Any group with any of these words in its title… Fraternal, Ancient, Order, Ordo, Lodge, Temple, Grand, Sacred, Rite, or Knights (and similar)… is very, very likely a fraternal organization with a Masonic organizational construct… and at the higher levels, at least, closely affiliated with the Freemasons if and when it becomes convenient to the parent group. Therefore, it is easy to involve small armies of ‘helpers’ if someone is deemed a target. It is important, however, to understand that the rank and file lodge Member who may be induced to participate, has zero true knowledge of you or the purpose of the targeting; they are simply ‘helping a friend’ to solve ‘a problem.’

I end this section with a simple note: all Masonic systems are quite steeped in ancient mysteries of the Middle East, and beyond, typically focusing on Egypt, Syria, and the Holy Land… with a touch of the Sub Continent (India, Nepal, etc.) and Far East.

 

The two shoe laces are tied together…

iu-2This is where it gets interesting. Most big city Police are encouraged to join the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), and it is indeed Masonic in structure. FOP, for instance, employs the Masonic all-seeing eye of Egyptian fame in their logo, which is a five-pointed star with a circle bisecting the points to create five triangles shaped like the Compass of the Masonic emblem, also the shape of the ancient steeply-angled Egyptian Burial (pyramidal) obelisk used for commoners’ crypts. There was additional heraldry-like art akin to European styling in the center of the star, shapes quite like those of most Police Badges, and incorporating an Eagle and other symbols. In other words, Police departments not only adopted the Lodge system almost universally, but did so to the point that their badges reflected elements of the FOP emblem. Almost all Police badge shapes generally post dated the FOP affiliations, underscoring the link. The exception would be Sheriff stars, and yet, that shape is also of ancient Masonic importance, in both the upright and upside-down (satanic Baphomet) versions.

If that were not enough to convince you, let us take a look at the Police Department of New Orleans. New Orleans existed as a city at the time of the Louisiana Purchase from France, in 1803. The first Masonic Lodge (a French version), was established there in 1793, all its members speaking French, and some Spanish, but no English of note. All the better to remain secret and mysterious to Americans, when they came into possession. But to fully appreciate New Orleans in the equation, we have to first look to New York.

In 1915, the Fraternal Order of Police established their first Lodge, there. It spread from there to many other cities in very short order. The FOP was not intended just to be a Lodge system, however; it also took on aspects of Unionization, a kind of bargaining force with the City whenever Members felt that Cops were not getting a fair deal from the Mayor. In many cases, in fact, their bargaining strength was augmented by the power of the greater Masonic power structure, a formidable force at the time.

Over time, actual unionization was also achieved in almost every major city, usually through the Mob’s control of the AFL-CIO, making it easier to arrange for hijacking of intrastate trucking or of dock cargo without anyone ever being sent to prison. But that’s another story. Ask any retired Union trucker or stevedore from Jersey. I’ve heard the same from 1975 Oregon members. The importance of that will explain to some Tis, those who believe they were targeted because they reported illicit drug operations or crimes which might be related to Unions, are targeted by Police. Additionally, of course, CIA sanctioned drug operations are protected by Police, as well. Thieves in bed with thieves, the bed made by the thieves.

Though New Orleans under the French had a Police Department as early as 1796, it had no Police Department for rather a long period of time after it raised the American flag. It was instead ‘policed’ by a vigilante system until 1853, when they formed their first ‘American’ Police Department. Almost immediately, they adopted the ancient Cresent and Star (upside down, larger star) as is common to Islam, as their badge. It is still in use, today, and appears on their cars, as well. Well before the FOP had even existed, this Department was already incorporating Masonic symbology directly in its badge. This is better known as the Shriner’s symbol, today… the Shriners being a Masonic fraternal lodge system.

 

iur

So, clearly, the Masonic influence and ties are present within most Police Departments. Cops form some of the strongest bonds between individuals in service outside of the Military, sufficiently strong, in fact, that if one of them asks a color-of-law favor of another, it is not likely to be turned down, and certainly unlikely to be exposed even if turned down. Therefore, it really only takes one Cop being approached from a fellow Lodge member to recruit several more for any needed aid, even if that request came from a lodge in another city. Ergo, escape to another city tends to never result in escape from targeting.

NOTE: That is why the Free Will Society exists; a solution to virtually all forms of targeting. Please join and support (donate/promote) our effort to create a targeting free intentional community of our own, and our other advanced programs planned for the future. If you are reading this, you should immediately join the Society and give it full support. It is a far more valuable TI resource in terms of programs and goals than any of the so-called ‘TI groups’ out there, today, the bulk of which are nothing more than information and disinformation mills.

Please: you owe it to yourself to visit freewillsociety.wordpress.com to learn more.

 

Three shoes?

Yes, there is a third shoe, one of special interest to those who feel the intelligence community lays behind their targeting. Every major Police Department in America has in place assets loyal to the Central Intelligence Agency, and many Officers have military intelligence backgrounds. Usually, you can count on some of them holding key positions within a given city: the Chief, the Public Relations Officer or Spokesperson, the head of Internal Affairs, the head of the Swat Team, and/or the Head of Personnel. From these posts, especially through IA, they are able to find bad cops who can be blackmailed into playing ball on an on-call basis, for any kind of dirty deed, to include color-of-law abuses such as is common to targeting. Don’t forget CIA drug running operations.

If that were not enough, there are similar, but far looser ties with FBI, Homeland Security, and the US Military Intelligence Agencies (and in some case, others, including the United Nations, and even Mossad). These generally entail the network of Fusion Centers and Centers for Excellence*, and special programs such as Community Policing and the Strong Cities Initiative/Network. When you consider that most all of these agencies use computer software based on CIA’s PROMIS data base management system, which is nothing more than a data base engine with a back door built in… almost any form of hanky-panky is possible. Ergo, the Navajo Beret Syndrome.

* Search for ‘Centers for Excellence + Homeland’ to see why I include it, here. All these items work together to collect, evaluate, and share information on (persons of interest). They operate as one big networked spy tool with usefulness in organized stalking which can easily be misused by anyone within LEA who has access.

So, even if Masons are not involved at all, Police can still be brought to bear on any given TI with the same level of efficiency, and in fact, the FOP can be leveraged into the equation just as easily, in reverse manner. Will the average member of the FOP, the Masons, the Police, or any of that long list of Agencies be aware of any of this? Absolutely not… not unless they are higher on the food chain. Then, of course, they won’t be admitting it, either. Complaining about it gains nothing. Knowing about it, and understanding it, can mean a lot, however.

You may not be able to beat it, but when the mystery is gone, its just another damned nuisance to deal with, and another reason to avoid trying to rely upon Police for help, unless you know one you have great respect and trust in. I was lucky. I had a relative who was a Cop in an uninvolved LEA, and he was able to help off the record in very useful ways. I also had help from ex FBI friends with back channel access, of like value.

We can’t all be so lucky. And if you are a TI, you know luck is not your strong suit.

Media’s Latest Conspiracy to Troll You on the Web


Fake news, tracking and targeting, subliminal messaging, repetition, distraction, and psychological manipulations by Trolls and Bots are not the only weapons they use to dumb you down and pump you up with their version of truth. Vanishing is their latest trick.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   MeWe   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2017, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.

 

The (fake) news media dilemma

Fake news and Web tracking and targeting, subliminal messaging, repetition, distraction, and psychological manipulations are not the only weapons they use to dumb you down and pump you up with their version of truth. It is not just Trolls and Bots we have to worry about, now. Vanishing is the latest trick used to conceal the truth and promote the lies.

Unidistract

Image analyzing How Media Dumbs you Down with clever tricks (see link)

I’ve written before about how television mainstream dumbs you down with clever psychologically aimed technical tricks in the actual image… largely relating their use of subliminal messaging, deliberate distraction, and overload. The general purpose being to further reduce the actual news you walk away with to the simplest of boiled-down sound bites… just the ones with their take on the news shaped for you according to whatever bias the network has at management level.

Elsewhere, there have been excellent examples of the use of NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming), also employed by broadcast media. It involves careful wording as well as clever body language to project the intended viewer/listener response to the message, within the message delivery, itself. It has been shown to be so powerful, a well trained user (a stage magician and hypnotist, who must rely on such deceits), was able to deliberately speed past a Cop and then use NLP to leave the traffic stop without the Officer even remembering why he had stopped him in the first place.

That kind of mis and disinformation borders on mind control, and in fact relies on mind control technology, psychological methodologies, and MC research by the likes of the Central Intelligence Agency. When the great bulk of media is controlled by fewer and fewer mega corps, and their corporate leaders tend to be like-minded politically, you get the double whammy of biased news and fake news (propaganda). That’s bad enough, but this article is about another dirty little trick… a bag of them, actually, used by all forms of Media when presenting ‘news’ online.

fbi-mocing-test.jpgAnd, of course, we still apparently still have to contend with CIA’s Operation Mockingbird, the installation of CIA operatives within the media industry to help shape news to their preferred version. That, too, is something I’ve written about, at least in terms of its origins and history, and I’ve even been referenced as a resource in a more ‘official’ industry review of that topic by The Reporter’s Committee for Freedom of the Press. But now, we see, actual ‘retired’ ‘once-a company man, always a company man’ CIA officials are becoming investors in and on-camera commentators in mainstream news. This Clyde Lewis Ground Zero episode reveals how serious a threat the placement of intelligence community actors in media actually is.

What News is supposed to look like

All news is supposed to contain the 5 Ws… Who, What, When, Where, and hoW. Ideally, we also need to know the S and M… the news Source and the Meaningfulness, often defined by Motive… the Why. That is supposed to be factual Motive, and not speculation, unless clearly presented as speculative commentary. Lately, that’s the greatest sin Media is guilty of; too much ‘news,’ today, is actually mere commentary… the propaganda version.

Generally, for some strange reason, it is also rare to get all those points, especially online. The most critical things useful for research tend to be left out, making it hard for pundits and anyone trying to chase down answers to hard questions because a given story fails to ‘compute.’ That is critical, if one is to find out more, and judge for one’s self what is true, and what is fake. This is particularly distressing when the potential for a conspiracy or cover up is apparent. While Sheeple don’t even see the glaring holes in the official story, people who think for themselves really want to know why those holes exist.

But we ‘conspiracy theorists’ and politically aware non sheeple are thwarted at almost every turn. Take for instance, the WHEN. It is extremely rare in online news reports to find out exactly when an event took place… esp. useful to insure the same news event you find is the one you wanted, because often, you might have two identical sounding stories in the same city, in different time frames. Most searches are best made by searching on the (event key details) plus the year, and perhaps, month.

But many reports do not cite the year, at all. The Web is smart, though, and it knows when a given URL was created. Unfortunately, many of the larger online news sources use a kind of ‘feeder board’ URL created way back when, which is updated with current news, only, older news dropping off. While the Web remembers what the page looks like when the story you are looking for took place… that story is no longer there when you go to find it. While you can search the archives if they bother to offer one, and PERHAPS find it, that is just one hurdle in the search.

Once you do have what seems to be a correct story’s article, it is amazing how many news reports fail to include the date in the byline at the top of the page. So you have no way to know when the person writing sat down to write the story. But even with a byline date, you still have a problem: is that date the date the news took place, the date they wrote the story, or the date it was posted? It can be any of the three.

Some stories are updates to older stories, so the byline is meaningless unless the story itself indicates the actual When it took place in the text. THEY SELDOM DO. Instead, they just say something like ‘Last Tuesday.’ Great. What day of the week is the date of the byline? Now I have to go search that out, to make certain of the When. Your average Sheeple is not going to bother.

This problem also exists elsewhere in the remaining Ws and the S and M. At least one such detail is usually omitted, and all-too often, several. Sometimes, it is something simply not yet learned by reporters, but too often, it is clearly just not deemed important. All too many bylines even fail to tell you who wrote the story… so you can’t email them and ask for missing information. EVERY print article in a newspaper tells you this information, but for some reason, the online version seldom does.

Message distortion when relayed through many people

Dumbing down online is easy. It relies on the known scientific problem which transpires when a series of people relay a message from one to another to another, etc. It used to be in schools, that one of the first things they taught was this concept… that you you have to take care when relaying information. You have to listen carefully, and then just as carefully repeat it. The problem is, each person decides what is important enough to be carefully repeated, and tends to reword it for ‘simplification.’ So the message first stated has little resemblance to the message last heard. THAT is not being careful, it’s being careless.

Online, information deemed worth sharing is constantly relayed in social media in a quite similar, but an even more careless manner. Each person in the chain tends to introduce it with their own spin or commentary, advising what they think the takeaway is, or should be. They then (hopefully) provide the URL to the original (the careful part). They might also create or add an image or meme which underscores their takeaway thought. That is all in good, but…

memesSheeple don’t bother to click on the URL and read the original story, and they simply ‘learn’ the takeaway point of the previous poster. This is why Memes can often be dangerous. Especially when the creator is being deceitful or dishonest to the truth. They know that a false message repeated some 20 times will take root in the average Sheeple’s mind, and become adopted. That is especially important in political messages, because today’s social media is decidedly biased, and decidedly deceitful, even to the point of using paid trolls and automated bots to insure you are inundated with the preferred take aways.

This is why people who think for themselves always click the link or do a little extra search before they hit the SHARE button, and add their own takeaway. Is that you? Are you like me, spending roughly 50% of your time inspecting and then correcting other people’s wrong take aways and falsehoods? Or, are you part of the problem, simply passing it along? Baa… baa…

But there is a bigger problem, one which at least seems conspiratorial, and relies on the above Sheeple foibles and the omission of Ws, etc. For some reason, mainstream news sources seem to be deliberately making it difficult for you to access news, and difficult to relay, on your own; they would prefer to leave that to the professional trolls and bots you think are your online friends.

Something is very wrong with this picture. Lets take print media and look at how they operate outside the Web, and compare that to how they are now starting to operate on the Web.

A newspaper runs advertising to pay for their staff and overhead; it keeps the doors open, and allows them to grow and invest in special investigative projects. They charge for subscriptions and for individual copies at news stands based on the cost of the printing and distribution process, and materials; the ink and paper. That’s why newspapers are relatively inexpensive to buy. It used to be that the online version, therefore, just had advertising… there is essentially no comparative cost to put it out there and for you to access it.

But now, online, many newspapers, even small local ones, are telling you that you will need to subscribe or become a registered user to their online version, or pay a small fee to read the article… or that you may read this one, but it may be the last one you can read for free (relies on your cookies, but if you turn them off, you they will tell you to turn them on to see the material). Of course, once you do any of that, you’ve just sold yourself into another dozen marketing lists, without warning or compensation. But that’s not all.

Unknown-1

Suddenly, many media outlets online (radio, networks, print) are using something called Cloudflare. That product is a kind of ‘protection’ against certain abuses… a bit like an anti hacking or virus bot. But it does something else, as well. It also prevents anyone from copying and pasting a URL into a social media post. WHY? In the past, getting your URL spread about was a good thing; it brought them more viewers, which increased the value of the advertising opportunity for their Web pages. When did they decide they didn’t want more readers, and why?

Unknown-2

Where the Conspiracy comes in

Sure. You can call this answer a theory; a conspiracy theory. That is what it is, plain enough. The only way the above sins can be excused as desirable is if somewhere, someone important and powerful within media and in political realms, decided that it was advantageous to dumb you down, and limit your ability to rely on URLs to relay facts and correct people when in error. It is an insurance policy to protect the ‘integrity’ of the versions being spread by the trolls and bots.

I mean, when your read some crap someone has posted which is to your understanding just that, a lie or false belief, you should be able to go find a news article or other authoritative source online, copy the URL, and paste it into your reply to prove your case. When you are trying to educate someone on how you feel about something, you should be able to do much the same, to prepare your post or meme… have a supporting factual link to go with it.

Someone does not want you doing that. They want you to hear something said 20 times and accept it as truth, with no way to verify it, or refute it, if false. There is only one person in the media industry who fits the bill. If you are a Sheeple, you will recognize his name but not realize just how powerful in media he is, or in political realms, and how deceitful he is. I am speaking of George Soros.

It is that simple. When most of us rely on TV news, we only get one slant (liberal, usually, conservative if you go out of your way). Because of TV’s own special dumbing down tricks as earlier referenced, you will walk away with a very encapsulated message with is has no actual understanding associated with it. Then, when someone puts their slant on it and you get hit with that 20 times, it becomes your slant, and people like me and others who prefer to think for ourselves, are increasingly finding it difficult to correct any errors.

Worse, if you do think for yourself, you may not be able to learn what you need to make an informed decision, up front. Heaven help you if you are trying to investigate what seems like a conspiracy theory, because of glaring holes in the official story. Obscuring the true story seems to be the way of things, today, so just ‘move along, folks.. nothing to see, here.’

iurWhen you add all this to what is taking place in the public school system and in higher education (liberal indoctrination), your children will think this is the way it is supposed to be, and whomever is in power when they are adults will be able to do and get away with whatever they want. They will dictate to them what to believe, and it will be believed. The notion of thinking for themselves, and of distrusting and challenging government will be foreign concepts. They might as well be called the 20x Generation.

The ’Snowflakes’ on the left are already a part of that group, unwilling to listen to facts or reason, and repeating what they are told to believe. I, for one, am not willing to pass the reigns of our nation’s future over to them, in their current state of mind. I’d rather have an armed revolution, if that is what it takes, to end their madness for them. Constant outrage based on lies serves no one’s best interest, except at the top of the food chain.

So my last question for you is this: do you want to be a Sheeple morsel for Wolves like Soros and his elite political friends, people more interested in Globalism than what is right and moral? Or do you want to be a think-for-yourself consumer of actual news you can easily access, rely upon, and use when talking to others about things which matter to you?

If the later, you had better start complaining to media, and to politicians about it. You might even want to consider taking legal action or starting an initiative ballot, if your State has that option, to write laws forcing journalists to adhere to journalistic standards and to make their stories available more appropriately. You certainly ought not simply be sharing what is being fed you currently without verifying for yourself it is the truth.

Else we all become 20xers… or we have that revolution, the least desirable of options.

8 False EAS Alerts in 5 Months = Conspiracy


We depend on Government in emergencies. But what if the emergency system designed to warn us was turned against us as a tool for Control? The unusual flurry of false EAS alerts of late may point to just that…

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   MeWe   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2017, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.

What you will learn reading this (long) post…

  • There has been a staccato series of ‘impossible’ false EAS alerts of late;
  • In fact, there have been twice as many as national media admits;
  • They defy statistical probabilities with no historical precedence;
  • This mimics other, similarly odd critical historical infrastructure failures;
  • Those infrastructures have associations w military & intelligence communities;
  • Their failures appear to serve the interests of the military/intel players;
  • The associations and interests are also a commonality to the EAS failures;
  • An analysis/projection as to what it all means: what to worry about.

 

Why can’t we trust the EAS System??

aaa.jpegIt makes no sense, unless you are a conspiracy theorist who knows something from history that others, do not… things having to do with CIA conspiracies which were NOT theories, but actual proven crimes. No one, I doubt, other than any conspirators involved, is in a better position to explain the true significance and offer the full details of these failures, than this writer. The full story is far bigger and scarier than the almost ‘entertaining’ or matter-of-fact dry news approaches found elsewhere, when dealing with the topic. We start with a simple question…

What is wrong such that there have been as many a EIGHT (more than a dozen, technically, depending on how one chooses to count) false Emergency Alert System issuances in the span of five short months… and that does not include several more potentially related, as separately described. That is in stark contrast to the fact that in the previous twenty years since replacing the old Cold War CONELRAD Emergency Broadcasting System in 1997, there had not been a single false alert of the same sort?*

It’s bad enough that EAS alerts start off with extremely annoying assaults in your ear, but when they turn out to have scared you into action for a false reason of some sort, you really get ticked off. Unfortunately, it appears there is even more to be angry about, than any of that… something greater to fear than these errors… even greater in scope and threat, perhaps, than the messages themselves, portrayed, even if real. Let’s take a look:

  1. False Tsunami alert, Jan 2, Seaside Oregon. Very specific, advising 4 hours to get to high ground;
  2. False Nuclear Attack alert, Jan 13, State of Hawaii. Very specific, advising “BALLISTIC MISSILE THREAT INBOUND TO HAWAII. SEEK IMMEDIATE SHELTER. THIS IS NOT A DRILL;”
  3. False Flood Warning, Jan 17, Morris County, New Jersey. Specific, narrowly distributed, and persistent, in that it was repeatedly issued to customers of only one cable provider, and could not be ended unless turning the the TV off and back on, after which it would reappear after a few moments;
  4. False Tsunami alert, Feb 6, Portland Maine. Also appeared in West Palm Beach, FL, and other locations on the East Coast, various locations in the Gulf of Mexico, and Puerto Rico. Very Specific, giving only 57 minutes warning;
  5. False Blizzard alert, Feb 19, Tucson, Arizona. Specific. Snow of any kind is extremely rare, there.
  6. False Tsunami alert, May 11, State of Alaska (two instances). Very Specific, and though only aired in Alaska, warnings itself cited entire North American Coastline (including British Columbia) and Hawaii;
  7. False Zombie Alert, May 20, Lake Worth, Florida. Very specific “POWER OUTAGE AND ZOMBIE ALERT FOR LAKE WORTH AND TERMINUS.” Companion message followed some time later “THERE ARE NOW FAR LESS THAN SEVEN THOUSAND-THREE-HUNDRED-EIGHTY CUSTOMER INVOLVED DUE TO EXTREME ZOMBIE ACTIVITY. RESTORATION TIME UNCERTAIN.” Note: for some reason, no news source makes record of BOTH messages, and many news pages on topic are now ‘404 Errors,’ as if someone is vanishing select reporting on this incident;**
  8. False Civil Emergency alert (2 messages), May 29, four counties about the Salem, Oregon State’s Capitol. Not exactly a false alert, it simply was wrong in content, non specific, “CIVIL EMERGENCY IN THIS AREA UNTIL 11:28 PM PDT PREPARE FOR ACTION.” This was followed by a second message some hours later advising that it was a “WATER EMERGENCY FOR THE SALEM AREA,” but gave no specifics, instead giving a web link for details. That clarification did not go out to adjacent areas, leaving those citizens, in the dark until media could figure it out and advise using their own services.***
  • Potentially Related: False Nuclear Power Plant Accident Alert, May 23, 2017, Salem County, New Jersey. A drill being conducted was interpreted as real by the system;
  • Potentially Related: False Blizzard Alert, May 16, State of Nebraska. Very Specific, listing all counties. Note: this alert was not found in mainstream news, but in a Youtube. However, the presenter specializes in videos of seismic activity recording instruments during events, and therefore, seems unlikely to be fake;
  • Potentially Related: False Zombie Alert, May 16, Great Falls, Montana. Very Specific, and claimed to be a hacking incident.
  • Potentially Related: False Nuclear Attack Alert April 22, 2018, Winnipeg, Canada. The Canadian system is not an American design, and works differently. However, there is some interfacing between them, as seen in the Alaskan Tsunami warning. This message was heard only (above link) through the cities various loudspeakers, which were not part of any official alert system, and is thought to be a prank. The message was, however, quite frightening and detailed, very specific, and, delivered in a computer voice with believable content: “This is a National Emergency. Important details will follow. (unintelligible) (emergency tones) The following message is transmitted at the request of the Canadian Government. This is not a Test. A nuclear attack is occurring against the United States and Canada. Six nuclear missiles have been launched from unknown locations, and are expected to strike the United States and Canada within the next 15 to 25 minutes. Due to the uncertain path of these missiles, all Canadian residents should seek out a fallout shelter immediately. If members of the Canadian armed forces direct you to a fallout shelter, please follow them for your safety. If no fallout shelters are available, get as far underground as possible. Stay away from windows, using heavy objects to put as many walls an layers of protection between you and the outside world as possible. You should put together a basic emergency survival kit including a flashlight and battery operated radio to use during your stay in the shelter. Stay tuned to local media for further information. Do not venture outside until notified it is safe to do so. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will be speaking on all stations shortly

One final point to consider: there are ‘consistent themes’ present in all of this, not all of which are obtusely visible, and perhaps not all revealed, herein. There is a Zombie theme, a nuclear theme, a Tsunami theme, and a ‘name’ theme, where the names of some counties involved match the names of some cities involved in other alerts, or vice versa, and similarly, a map location theme (East, West, and Gulf Coasts, and dead center U.S., plus Canada; all four ‘sides’ and the ‘center’). There is also a ‘date’ theme, since all but one event transpired in the same three months, six of those in one month, two on the same date. Collectively, these thematic patterns raise additional questions as to the likelihood of mere ‘coincidences’ or ‘accidents’ being involved.

Note: this is a long post which goes into great detail that there be no misjudgment by the reader. It is suggested you not read further until you have enough time to finish (scroll now to evaluate reading time).

 

 The asterisks

*Each of the false alerts prior to 2018 had a completely different nature than those cited above, especially in that the older false alerts were not generated by use of the system, as such.  All but one of those above had a cause/blame element or mitigating circumstance pointing to failures in the system, even when human error was also involved, whereas all prior errors on record (about a dozen spread out over the 20 years), were due to hacking (1), mistakes in advertising (several), or film production (several). There were additional failures where tests failed to transmit, at all. It can be said that all of the historical problems boiled down to human error traced to failing to understand how the system worked, or failing to use it at all (failed transmissions). That is not true of the six in question.

The thing to underscore is that there is near zero similarity to the current failures, in analysis. Even when human error played contributory roles (two events), something in the System, itself, was also to blame… which is a mystery, because there has been no change to the system which could account for a change in reliability or performance. Differences aside, keep in mind too, that there is no guarantee that any given official explanation is necessarily the truth; such things gone wrong involving government often involve cover (up) stories… especially if there is a conspiracy, somewhere in the woodwork.

There was one instance of hacking in the older events, but a long list of those older false alerts were triggered because radio or TV stations used tape which had previously held EAS content, where the signal which triggers the system was still detected by the system though otherwise inaudible. The EAS tone has a digital signature which the system detects for actuation… and the annoying tones themselves are that digital signal in audio form… which also triggers the system if in broadcast content. Beyond the hacking, this signal was itself the source of the remaining problems, primarily because human operators were unaware of it’s technical nature:

One national Arco Ad deliberately included the tones with the ad message to get the listener’s attention in ‘gag-like’ motif, and concluded with “This test brought to you by ARCO.” One local advertiser also incorporated the tones in similar marketing intent, but the NBC affiliate running the ad locally did not know it would trigger and automatically transmit the alert nation-wide over the entire NBC network. Movies sometimes include the sound in their digital sound tracks when the plot calls for it, and when aired on TV, that, too, triggers the system (Olympus Has Fallen was an example). The most recent example was a sports radio program using the tones in a review of a sporting event where the alerts triggered during the event, a matter resulting in $2.5M in fines to the program producers and the station involved.

These differences highlight the unusual series of late, which contrast in both frequency statistics and historical relevance; if the given explanations are true (there have been few explanations yet offered, and they have been speculative or non specific in nature, chiefly passing the buck to some other quarter; ‘It wasn’t us;’ the message came from (someone else). ‘Someone else’ had nothing to say. So, we now have one more serious question to ask:

How come we have not encountered these kinds of failures, before?

**The Zombie alert is particularly disturbing for three reasons, none of which sound particularly believable, but they are true. One is tied to where it took place, in that there have been multiple news stories in Florida in this last decade, all about REAL Zombie attacks, including banned Youtube videos of a naked man who had to be shot by Police because he refused to obey orders to stop eating the face of another man he had subdued violently. Another incident had a man who was undeterred by multiple tasers and a Police Dog, and had to be pulled off of the body of his victim by four Officers, after chewing on his victim’s face. These attacks were blamed on Flakka, an exotic Chinese-made designer drug with extreme and unpredictable hallucinogenic properties.

The other is that the Center for Disease Control’s official Web site has a whole page on Zombie attack preparedness. It is a not-so-easily-detected Onion-style tongue-in-cheek attempt (they claim it a marketing gimmick) to force people into thinking about emergency preparedness. It may have worked, but given the news stories and the EAS alert, one has to wonder… how is it that the word Zombie has more something like a dozen times made it into elements of the EAS system? In the recent incident of concern, it seems the word was not typed in by a human, but somehow, it was substituted for the word for ‘weather.’ I point out that procedurally, it takes two people to enter a custom message, the typist, and a supervisor who dictates and/or approves it while watching over the shoulder; a kind of failsafe system to spot/prevent such errors.

aabb.pngThe other general false Zombie messages took place in 2009 and 2012. Highway traffic alert signs (i.e., the ‘Amber System’, School Zone signs, freeway traffic signs, etc.) started warning of Zombie attacks. Amber and many highway systems, and any local emergency cell-phone subscription services, are all interfaced with EAS to one extent or another. The Zombie messages transpired in scattered cities around the nation with some variety in specific content. One school zone speed warning sign read “ZOMBIE INFECTED SCHOOL AHEAD”,  whereas most of other traffic signs read “WARNING! ZOMBIES AHEAD.” Fortunately, those events were not based in reality… yet.

One more ‘bonus’ reason exists, but is its own matter of importance with respect to the conspiracy theory alluded to in the introduction.****

***The Oregon Capitol (Salem) suffered a biological water contamination (algae bloom toxins) which was dangerous to very young or old persons, and anyone with a hampered immune system. But though city planners were aware of the problem, they waited four days before issuing the Alert, thinking they would simply ‘fix’ the problem with water treatment, and retest the water.

That’s what they did, but the brainy (I should point out that Oregon is run by extreme leftist progressives, not known for thinking problems through to proper conclusion before acting) Oregon officials failed sent the sample to an out-of-state lab by mail despite having ample local testing resources, forcing a considerable delay. Additionally, the problem initially transpired over a holiday weekend, and they just couldn’t be bothered to be proactive in the face of a potential life-threatening situation. Oregon is often described as a ‘Let-it-burn State,’ because they habitually fail to respond to emergencies until an extreme crises, a pattern especially visible in how they respond to forest fires… which is to say not at all, unless and until it starts threatening communities or major commercial ventures, or starts to make national news (they don’t like negative PR).

In like manner, the State failed in its ability to notify citizens when the water was finally again safe to drink. Some blame the Governor, Kate Brown, who is thought to have ‘not let a good crisis go to waste,’ and who thereby let the problem get large enough for grandstanding, by calling in the National Guard to provide potable water in a near ‘Martial Law disaster response’ manner. That thus illustrated ‘leadership in a crises,’ when it was actually a non crises which had apparently already resolved itself, before she gave the orders, had anyone bothered to correctly clarify the matter.

Even the second EAS ‘explanation’ message was sufficiently non specific such that it caused extreme social and financial hardships on businesses and citizens, esp. those working for the countless eateries and other firms which shut down because they feared using water, at all, and because people panicked and hit the stores to gobble up as much bottled water as they could muster. As result, some stores raised prices on bottles to as high as $50 a case, and they got it. The Governor has ordered those firms to be prosecuted for their profiteering in a crises, which is akin to hording in terms of emergencies, under the law. This was also part of her grandstanding, as it seems the threat was never carried out, probably because the law only applies under FEMA control in disaster response, and/or in the case of actual Martial Law. I’ll defer to legal teams on that, as this is certain to lead to lawsuits against the City and the State, as well as stores involved (that’s another way Oregon burns).

In addition, Kate attempted to blame Donald Trump policies in purely political diatribe, which had nothing to do with anything. And, subsequently, the State moved to order residents of four rural counties to ‘stop using well water’ because ‘it is lowering river levels’ and threatening the water supply of the cities. The State has no legal right to usurp the property (water rights) of citizens without due process, and in point of fact, the wells in question do not impact the river levels, as is scientifically proven by several means.

But it made good PR for the liberals in the cities, who hold the greater number of votes. So, in a way, this particular EAS was part and parcel of its own little political conspiracy, though it did not originate as such, nor was it causal to the false and functionless alerts… assuming you don’t count public panic a function.

****Conspiracy? This conspiracy theorist has many times proven theories true, and in fact, correctly predicted 9-11, and afterwards, personally thwarting another predicted terror attack in Portland (link: mid page). Over the years, conspiracy theorist thinking also enable me to help put a good number of bad people into jail who were engaged in organized or individual crimes, some of which made national news. These predictions and the crime busting was largely made possible by first formulating a conspiracy theory, then postulating a means to prove it, and researching to find the predicted evidence it was so. There is no difference in methods employed by a good theorist and law enforcement, except that the later has virtually unlimited resources and tools available.

By such means, after ten years of research, I developed Unified Conspiracy Theory in and for my book set, Fatal Rebirth. It was the UTC which predicted the terrorism, and much more as cited above, including the Derivatives financial disaster, select gun violence, an assassination attempt tied to a Presidential campaign, and much more. In reverse manner, it showed how the long list of ‘random’ bumps-in-the-night of American History (i.e., S&L crises, assassinations, Iran Contra, OKC and WTC bombing, etc.) were not random, but stepwise logical acts in a PLAN to towards meeting a SPECIFIC GOAL… which also accounts for the extreme leftist nature and actions of the Democrats since Obama took and then lost office. That, I did not foresee, though at the time, it appeared that the far Right would do much the same if unchecked. Let’s just say that the UTC saw little difference between a Clinton and a Bush… ‘New Boss same as the Old Boss.’

The history which enabled the UTC itself brings us to some things which were part of those bumps in the night… which directly speak to this rash of EAS false alerts… as well as the highway sign warning system false alerts. The UTC in fact predicted abuse of EAS in false flag manner. That history tells us that these emergency alert systems were not the first to suffer highly questionably and unbelievably coincidental rashes of system ‘failures’ tied to conspiracies. To explain, we go back to CIA’s Operation Mockingbird… which through knowing, will help explain EAS matters. If already familiar with Mockingbird, you may skip to the last paragraph in the section, below.

 

Mockingbird

Operation Mockingbird was a CIA project which was started in the 1950’s (Wikipedia uses the word ‘allegedly,’ but it is well documented, even indirectly referenced in the Congressional Record in both the Watergate affair, and in the Church and Rockefeller Committee reports on CIA mind control operations. Mockingbird disinformation was a subtle but effective form of mind control through, at the very least, the mid 70’s… and that date IS ‘alleged,’ because there have been many proofs it is still in play well into this Century, as one example, below, will attest.

Mockingbird was a large-scale infiltration of mainstream U.S. and foreign Media. In the U.S., alone, there were thousands of operatives involved. This included small student and cultural organizations all the way up to big TV network news and newspapers, and Internationally, it included whole Wire Services, such as A.P., U.P.I., and Copely… which of course, also impacted American news sources who regularly passed on their stories unchecked. Most were recruited as in place employees or managers ‘hired’ or ‘bribed,’ or otherwise coerced into cooperation, but actual CIA agents were also put on the payrolls of cooperative media. In some cases, CIA actually bought the firms, and staffed them with whomever they pleased.

Big names were involved, too. William S. Paley (head of CBS), Walter Cronkite (CBS), Henry Luce (Time/Life), James Copely (Copely News Services), Phil and Katherine Graham (Phil @ Washington Post and as head of Mockingbird within his industry, Kate following in his footsteps, and later, Time/Life/Warner’s infection, along with their existing Mockingbirds). The list goes on, to include many key people in at least 25 newspapers and every TV network — and Hollywood was by no means exempt. That number of newspapers is interesting, because it is not the first time.

Prior to WWI, the ‘Powder Interests’ (the predecessor to the Military Industrial Complex) organized conspiratorially to get America into the war by bribing the Managing Editors of 25 newspapers to sway America away from its isolationist and neutral thinking regarding the war in Europe. That IS succinctly and precisely found in the Congressional Record. They did this in a manner similar to the way a CIA Public Relations Firm and CIA proper arranged to get America into ‘America’s New War’ (the ‘slogan’ adopted by mainstream media in Wag-the-Dog media manipulation manner), Desert Storm, the liberation of Kuwait. This was a modern post 2000 example of Mockingbird’s model in play.

CIA and it’s CIA controlled PR firm, fostered a lie (disinformation) in news stories and in false testimony before Congress (and rolling news cameras) that Iraqi invaders were killing Kuwaiti babies, Doctors, and Nurses in order to steal incubators from hospitals. In WWI, they did the same, the lie being that Germans were raping and cutting the breasts off of Belgium women thought to be corroborating with the resistance movement. Both lies were bought, hook, line, and sinker, and helped bring America to war. The first casualty of war, is said to be ’Truth,’ and it falls well before the war actually starts.

What does that have to do with EAS, you ask? What is EAS (and the highway signs), but a way to spread key information to people… or DISINFORMATION? It is just a slightly different but much more urgent and powerful cannot-be-ignored way, than mere media.  Now, for the rest of the story: this is indeed not the first time there have been conspiracies which parallel these ‘errors’ in other kinds of critical national systems… and their very nature implies Mockingbird-like ties to the intelligence community, was involved. Everything you are about to read next about these events is fully reviewed and documented in Fatal Rebirth, and were, in fact, key components of the UTC’s evolution and ultimate predictive capabilities.

 

Telephone and Power Grid systems

Both of these critical national infrastructures are well regulated, if not designed, in a collaboration between their key industry players and government overseers, including one or more intelligence agencies. NSA and Ma Bell worked very closely together to design the ‘modern’ digital telephone system (‘modern,’ because it was as early as 1960… an important date in our discussion). FBI and CIA were also ‘in-the-loop,’ along with the Pentagon and at least Army Intelligence (perhaps other branches, as well).

The nation’s Power Grid, on the other hand, has been an evolving design overseen for security and technical purposes by the US. Department of Energy. DOE has historically had strong ties to CIA, to include, for instance, cooperative efforts in the area of Mind Control research (again, in the Congressional Record, and in this case, official DOE files online). Again, FBI, et. al, have always been in the oversight loop. Curious then, that both these systems have suffered mysterious rashes of failures almost identical in pattern to the EAS and highway sign failures. I summarize, here, from documentation in Fatal Rebirth:

The Power Grid has suffered two ‘batches’ of failures. The first was over two years (1996-98), during which three of the four major multi-state grid sectors suffered a complete catastrophic power outage. The second string of outages took place over three years (2001-03) with similar results. Both series involved other countries, as well, all relying on US grid design formats or the failed grid’s power, itself.

This was all blamed on trees and lightening strikes, neither of which hold water for technical reasons which render them it quite implausible, especially given the repetitive nature in tight time constraints… it would be like claiming every assassination effort in the last 50 years involved a JFK magic bullet, including the one against Reagan by Sqeaky Fromme, where no shot was fired. Simply put, trees are not allowed anywhere near the high tension lines involved, and all lines are isolated from ground, where their towers are in their place grounded lightening rods intended to prevent lightening strikes from impacting the lines. These are cover up stories. If they were valid explanation, the history of outages would consistently have the same failures ongoing, and not be isolated to neat little clusters.

And it is JFK which brings us full circle to that 1960 date… and to the phone systems. The digital phone system was launched in 1960, just in time for the assassination of JFK in 1963. The entire phone system in Washington, D.C., was shut down the very hour of the assassination, and not restored until Vice President Johnson was sworn in. Evidence generally accepted in books on topic (i.e., Mark Lane’s Plausible Denial) indict G. Gordon Liddy, ex FBI player trained in manipulation of the digital system, and closely aligned with the CIA team assassinating Kennedy according to courtroom testimony (same book), also the same team to the man involved in Watergate, along with Liddy. The D.C. outage would eventually be duplicated in a bigger scale, nationwide…

These also were in two batches. In 1991 a series of major land-line outages in America caused large area networks to go dark, all within the same two month period, each impacting key cities and whole States, D.C. style. In fact, D.C. was one of the cities, and part of the mystery is that major cities on vastly different regional networks were simultaneously failed in most of these outages, often thousands of miles apart. Like the Power Grid, post Fatal Rebirth, another series of such outages has taken place, this time impacting select Cellular carriers, the most recent recent of note impacting multiple carriers and the entire Southeast U.S. More to follow, on that. Like the EAS alert errors, no actual definitive explanations were ever fielded.

 

What it all means

There are two important meanings. The only one obvious and stated elsewhere in media accounts on the topic is the concern about public safety. If you cannot trust the accuracy of the EAS system, people could end up being harmed physically or financially by false alerts, or worse, end up in like state because they had lost faith in the accuracy of the system and failed to properly and promptly respond to an actual emergency. It matters now WHY the errors exist, for this concern to be valid. Be it because of hacking, human error, design flaws, or political motives, lives are still at risk of serious negative impact. But that is nothing, compared to the greater, unseen threat implied as covertly present:

The UTC says these were all test ‘failures’ caused by elements of the intelligence community, principally as ‘tests’ of their ability to manipulate the systems involved, as a matter of Civil Control. This would logically be a logical step in preparation for potential serious civil disobedience, Martial Law, or some kind of political Coup. The more recent events were, in fact, predicted by the UTC in Fatal Rebirth. Such would be a powerful disinformation tool, one having the unique potential to be both a conspiratorial false flag style pre event deception, and a support for post event cover up… ‘official proof’ as to what the ‘official truth’ was intended to be.

Certainly, any given event we have reviewed could in truth be simple natural failures with no attendant conspiracy attached. But given the batch nature and other similarities to the power/phone system failures, and the other highly coincidental clues discussed herein, the whole cannot in any way be innocent. Consider this: if we suspect conspiracy based test ‘failures,’ we must presume they would need to predate some future major event of potential concern such as to warrant such a desperate total blackout of (power, phones, or both… along with EAS, and highway signs.) Restated; if expected to be needed, you would damn well test something that complex and important, first, and early enough to perfect the effort should it test poorly. Any such predating would need allow a couple several months to years to ‘fix’ any flaws causing the tests to fail, in order to retest to insure it worked flawlessly when it really mattered. Hence, tests might require two batches.

So… what about that dating?

We need look at the outage dating and see if there were any events which might require outages of power and phone systems, as a means of validating conspiracy concerns. We must think of such outages as contingent emergency responses to control populations in an otherwise out-of-control situation threatening government security… or the security of those working in the shadows on conspiracies of their own against the nation. If we find such in place, then we have a potential UTC-like scenario we can then apply to divine what may lie ahead, based on the current flurry of false alerts.

Power, 1996-98: two years before 9-11. If that was a false flag attack, as much evidence reveals it to be (another part of the Operation Northwoods plan thought to have part of why Kennedy was assassinated), then any serious failure in keeping the truth a secret might require shutdown of the country’s ability to rally against a more dramatic coup required to prevent or deal with armed revolution, or similar civil upheaval. A FEMA takeover would be the perfect cover for such a coup, and give time to manufacture and establish an effective cover up, such as showing some dead bodies thrown under the Bus as conspirator ‘ring leaders.’ In fact, Homeland Security was established exactly two years prior to 9-11, to the day… and was planed by PNAC and the Anser Institute (an intelligence community think tank), all planned in the same general time frame as the test outages.

Power, 2001-03: one year prior to a UTC predicted terror attack on Portland, Or, which I personally thwarted, involving two of FBI’s Top 10 most wanted terrorists (identified by video and eye witnesses – details here)… not to mention at least one FBI agent, false flag style. Five years before Barrack Obama would run for President with some reason to fear possible assassination, which could in theory spark a race war or similar unrest. Either one of these events might require outages in order to retain or restore control and mitigate damages from resulting civil turmoil.

Power, regional Southwest outage, 2011 (also post Fatal Rebirth): this is the most recent and singular outage event, only suspicious because no cause for it has ever been discovered, though hacking and terrorism have both been ruled out. It is several years before the growing racial violence potential during the Obama Administration, and for the matter, the current turmoil among the radical left caused by Trump’s Presidency. Additionally, there has been an endless series of news events, mostly centering around gun violence involving black victims or civil rights issues had a potential for sparking the race war feared by the Rodney King beatings. The assassination fear would also remain.

Phones, 1991 series: three years before the Rodney King beating, the WTC bombing, and the Branch Davidian nightmare at Waco. The CIA, military intelligence, and the greater Military Industrial Complex were involved in all three events. Two years before the assassination attempt predicted by the UTC on Presidential Candidate H. Ross Perot.

Phones; regional outage 4 carriers in four Southeast States, 2011 (post Fatal Rebirth): this was allegedly due to a single cut land-line cable, but who and how the cable was severed has NEVER BEEN DETERMINED. There is a possibility that the cut took place AFTER the outage was achieved by other, unknown means. The Occupy movement was generally organized/proposed/planned beginning in May of 2011. Intelligence Agencies would have been aware then, or shortly thereafter, and would need to take some time to consider contingencies, once knowing the event’s schedule. The outage transpired in August, and the actual Occupy Event in America took place in mid September, exactly 45 days later. It had the potential to be evolve into a national or even global revolution.

A little complex to relate in a blog already long in tooth, but suffice it to say that any one of these outage events could easily be shown to be a preparatory test in support of a plot or other expected event with the potential to result in wide-spread civil disobedience. CIA operated spy planes remapping US cities and coordinated with the Pentagon in planning for military takeover if riots spread beyond LA, where military intelligence operatives initiated much of the violence disguised as angry Blacks from Watts. WTC was orchestrated and facilitated by both CIA and military intelligence, principally to empower Osama bin Laden’s Al Queda as the premier terrorist group, and place two top aids into the organization as double agents. The bloody end planned for Waco risked exposing CIA mind control programs and premeditated mass murder, and took place under Bill Clinton, he and his wife also ‘former’ CIA operatives, if not agents. Perot’s assassination attempt was by mailed Anthrax, same as used against one of Clinton’s body guards who was to testify against him in the Whitewater affair, and as used against media and Congress post 9-11. Any one of these events going wrong and leading to exposure of the truth (esp. who was behind them) could result in serious civil upheaval or dangerous collapse of government infrastructures, including the military and intelligence community.

Note: Phone and/or Power outages also generally kill Internet services in the same areas effected. Power outages kill everything, including gasoline supplies, sales of critical emergency supplies at most retailers, and access to cash from the banking system. These things critically impact the ability of Citizens to exercise much of any effort beyond mere survival, easily putting a crimp in any major organized events. Outages effectively ‘freeze’ political, social, and physical states of the region(s) affected until authorities can gain control. Emphasize, CONTROL.

 

What might the current EAS failures portend?

What if the theory is true? Again, in UTC manner, one can attempt to ‘look ahead’ and divine what might be needed to fulfill the last remaining ’puzzle piece’ in the theory; the otherwise inobvious ’need’ for such a test. Two such possibilities come easily to mind. Without being more in tune with current events at the book-research level, I can think of no others, but they certainly may exist. Or, of course, I could be all wet… which is for you to decide… comments welcome, even if critical.

Given the current level of unrest and hatred found on the far left, and the violence and aggressiveness they have lately resorted to, I can only conclude that many of the EAS failures were potentially tests preparatory for a national crisis based on an attempt to depose President Trump and assume control of the White House. It might be an assassination, some form of a coup attempt, an outright civil war between the left and right… or as simple as a highly questionable impeachment effort. I rate that as number one in likelihood.

Number two relates well to the Zombie element. Many conspiracy theorists… and the UTC does foresee the possibility… believe that some form of biological pathogenic pandemic based on zoonotics (man-made virus, generally race specific) is in our future. Fatal Rebirth and my latest book, Who’s Killing the Bilderbergers, both spend a lot of time examining this notion. The theory is that the New World Order will move to both reduce the population of the World and to weaken America’s ability to defend itself against foreign interests (including NWO desires to see a North American Union consisting of Canada, the U.S., Mexico, and the other Central American countries), and will foment a biological attack disguised as some random but previously unknown virus.

It is also possible that large quantities of Flakka could be manufactured and introduced into the water system, slowly. That would make some sense of the Zombie alerts, and the EAS problems related to the water system in Oregon. Slow introduction of Flakka would result in evolving mental instability of the population, at large, such as we are seeing demonstrated more and more in bizarre news stories. At some point, ‘Zombie attacks’ would start to transpire, especially with a sudden increase in Flakka distribution through secondary food sources or aerosol disbursement. If this scenario were a valid concern, the ability to interfere with the EAS system in the event of water testing producing evidence of Flakka introduction would be necessary, which therefore makes Oregon’s EAS failure a little more suspicious than simple stupidity or political malfeasance.

Regardless of if you accept my evaluation and speculations, or not, it is clear we cannot trust the EAS system, and whatever the reason behind the failures really is, it isn’t going to be an answer likely to make us warm and fuzzy about the system, or our future. Especially since it looks like we will never get that answer, at all. That, btw, is how conspiracies work best; treat the public like mushrooms in the basement. You won’t be fed useful information likely to get you out of the dark.

It helps nothing that you can find at least a dozen Youtube’s and other Web resources telling you how to fake an EAS alert. Doing so in any way which reaches the public or accidentally triggers the EAS system, is a federal crime. That so many seem to be freely promoting fakes alert methods… itself seems somewhat conspiratorial.

Yet, somewhat unfortunately, one MUST play safe and act as if any EAS alert is valid. Ultimately, that is the only advice I can offer… but as the baseball player said in Field of Dreams… “Watch out for in your ear.” If you prefer a brainier quote: “Men still have to be governed by deception,” Georg C. Lichtenberg, 18th Century Scientist and Political Satirist.

U.S.P.S. “Informed Delivery” Potential Threat to Everyone, Esp. Stalking Victims


Thanks to the Post Office, now anyone can know what’s in your mailbox, automatically… including of course, anyone in an alphabet agency. It is just another way to track you and criminalize you if deemed convenient, in time.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2017, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.

“Informed Delivery?”

web_USPSThe idea is you register online with USPS for the FREE notification subscription service, and they then photograph the mail to be delivered to you each day, and email the images to you before delivery; that way, you know if something is stolen or lost and NOT in the delivery, and can plan on getting expected items. It is tied to other services, as well, such as package notifications, tracking services, stamp purchases, etc.

1) This is the federal government we are talking about. The FBI, CIA, and a host of other alphabeticals would have no trouble whatsoever accessing this information. There is no indication that such information is not retained indefinitely, and no privacy statement which alleviates concerns over it being used against you down the road should you become a person of interest, or a trouble maker such as a whistleblower, activist, or other targeted individual.

2) The system is achieved with online registry, and is handled by email, currently with no truly secure process for verification of the applicant or notification of the addressee that a subscription has taken place. Stalkers, private investigators, suspicious spouses or ex spouses or lovers with an axe to grind, or anyone else with minimalist information about you and where you live could sign up pretending to be you… again to include someone working for a government agency who could not be bothered with a warrant — knowing that they could later get a warrant and legally go back in time to ‘duplicate’ the effort in a manner which leaves no proof they violated your rights, earlier.

3) this means that mail must be separately sorted one more time by someone into individual stacks to ‘pose’ for the photograph, and then to take the image and email it… or the entire automated system must significantly modified at both the hardware and software level. Both are at great expense and will cost USPS more red ink… and eventually that cost will increase the price of postage for everyone, not just those using the service.

4) If the system is automated (and even a manual system will be, eventually), then it means EVERYONE’S MAIL is being imaged, all the time: The USPS becomes yet one more information tracking and tracing point available to the government, and under the program, anyone spoofing it.

I’m not the only one pointing these things out… though I’m the only one so far who has pointed out 3 & 4. Other privacy experts have echoed 1 & 2, variously, mostly item 2. Too many people PRESUME that government would NEVER use such a service to spy on them this way. That’s what they said about NSA and FBI when they first started.

Defensive Measure?

It appears the only way to prevent anyone to spoof the system to spy on your mail is to beat them to the punch and register, yourself. However, there is no assurance in place that someone could not still additionally register an alternate email identity. We can only hope and presume there is an online software check which would reject any such attempt.

Short of not taking mail, at all, there is no defense against government use of the images, if you are a person of interest targeted in someway by an agency.

https://link.usps.com/2017/08/29/informed-delivery/

Risks in 12 Step Programs, esp. for TIs


What most people fail to realize is where these programs came from and the potential for targeting abuse by sinister forces.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2017, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.
 

12 Step Origins

I am not going to tell you there is no value in any specific outwardly decent 12 Step Program. They do tend to have value to the countless individuals who desperately sought and found through them a path out of a self-destructive addiction or abuse. As such, they also generally have an excellent track record of success vs. failures.
However, I am going to tell you why they can become a trap for select individuals, and just why and how. I am referring to targeted persons and non targeted persons who hold power, influence, or key positions of any kind. I am also going to offer a very simple alternative which has no traps, no downsides, and no financial or time burdens; something that’s been around for thousands of years. It has worked for me, repeatedly, for both serious uses (including targeting), and more frivolous. It is a 1-step solution.
Like the Freemasons and Knights Templar before them, 12 Steps outwardly maintain a squeaky clean public image, but what is inside at the higher levels of operation can be insidious, especially to those select individuals. Also like them, they profess to be God-centered, but fail to define the nature of God or rely on Christian doctrine in their dealings. While even the bulk of staff may think these things true and hold personal faiths they see melding with the program usefully, it does not mean that internally, the truth is not otherwise.
This is because the very first 12 step programs were introduced almost simultaneously and by the same people as two other dark forces applied to the needs of their founders — persons of mutual interests who, in oversimplification, I’ll call the New World Order. That can mean the Illuminati, the Masonic influence, the 1%, globalists, members of round table groups, or even satanists, etc. You are welcome to free associate as you wish; all is usefully accurate within the realm of perpdom.
The first such program, circa 1920, was to combat alcoholism, just in time for prohibition. Many others followed the 12-step blueprint for other ‘habits,’ over time… and while some may have been absent of dark influence when founded, they all would be rather easy to infiltrate. The two additional forces spoken of can be seen as quite related in purpose and means to the darker nature of the ‘bad’ 12 step programs; actual mind control research projects, and the New Age movement, itself. All three served as a means to the same kinds of goals; growing the force I call Shadow in my book set, Fatal Rebirth, detailing the games played by modern-day Illuminati.
12-steps.3

Technically, there is a 13th step, one early in the program; the assigning of a help mate, intending that you each help one another to stay on the narrow path, since ‘you can’t do it on your own.’

The New Age movement and select early mind control research, as well as the first 12 Step, were all funded by and proxy organized for the Rockefellers and Rothchilds, with counterparts in Europe. The New Age stuff started with the establishment of the Theosophical Society, which evolved series of petri-dish style afterbirths of cults, false religions, and philosophical mysticisms any Mason would relish. That’s not just rhetoric, because most of these mind game groups were organized along the Masonic lodge system, where secrets were king, and held only by the higher ranks, and/or used to manipulate and control members.

Divinity    emblemfix  Rockefeller Foundation_0.png  Unknown-12    th-19

Templars          Masons                                                                    Theosophy     Rothchilds

We need not get into mind control, here; most readers will already know more than they want to about that, first hand. Those that don’t know, should stop right here, and go read my book, MC Realities. In that book, I produce a Timeline of Masonic/Illuminati/MC Evolutions. It specifically outlines with nearly 80 entries (and more again in the text of the book) several thousand years of such treachery. It includes the 12 Steps.
Again, not wanting to paint the wrong picture about 12 steps, the darker side or risk is not a concrete given for any individual program. Some are undoubtedly completely safe. But if the person seeking their help is already a TI or someone of power and influence, the risk is not insignificant. As a consultant to TIs, at least a dozen clients I have worked with were shown to have been targeted and/or manipulated through their 12-step. This was at times the origin of the targeting, and at others, simply augmentation of existing targeting. This was divided about 50-50.
The primary risk for non TIs is BLACKMAIL, as the 12 step programs always include FULL CONFESSION with prying out of juicy details, things which can result in one’s being targeted to take advantage. While the core of it is during sessions, additional information can be gleaned through the additional risk… which is the fact that attendees are given an ASSIGNED PARTNER (sometimes called a ‘sponsor’), and the resulting effort to become very close and ‘mutually reliant.’ Where the program has a nefarious side, that partner is not very likely to be one’s true helper, as proclaimed for purpose. But they will grow very close, learn much, and be able to exert influence, and even sabotage the victim of their deceits.
In some cases, other attendees and staff members of the program can also be turned against the TI, though generally in ways undetected until too late. Once participation in targeting is detected, an adversarial relationship can quickly develop, with decidedly one-sided advantage; the targeted will suffer a lack of credibility, and the threat of their secrets being revealed. In one one such case, it resulted in physical assaults and scare tactics, one of which eventually resulted in the accidental death of the TI.
Sidebar comment regarding other attendee participation: bear in mind that each attendee is in a similar position of vulnerability, and can be subject to manipulative forces at the psychological level which coerce their cooperation in any such targeting. In time, they may be discerned and known as ‘visible’ perps, but this is not quite the case.
The real evil never shows its face; the attendees themselves are also victims, likely unwitting conspirators in they know-not-what. They do not deserve hatred or vilification, but pity and prayers, if not perhaps outreach and education as to the ‘MC Realities’ of their own situation. It is not impossible to turn them to the TI’s side as covert operative; a means to learn who the invisible persons are, and their motives.
I will go so far as to say, that 12 step counseling sessions are operated using known psychological control methods designed to lower the defenses and encourage the attendee to spill their guts, and accept advice and help which in fact is intended to control them. It is not any different than any other form of mind control in terms of intent or result, even when the purpose is benevolent, as advertised. It is, after all, the intent of such programs to help the individual to do things they have been unable to achieve on their own… to control their actions for good. But when used for the nefarious, the results can be devastating well before any sense of betrayal is realized (if ever). Where already a TI, one can be easily sabotaged and brought deeper under control through the 12-step.
Where the individual is powerful or well placed to the interests of the NWO, it becomes a very simple thing to gain control over the individual either by blackmail and or influential manipulation by the assigned partner or ‘buddy.’ Imagine a Senator with a drug or sex problem, or a key corporate employee with access to proprietary secrets; perfect blackmail candidates. These manipulations can can also provide an avenue or stage for the introduction of other forms of mind control or targeting down the road; the victim becomes an ongoing TI.
Consider the oddest and most shocking news out of the District of Columbia, and other power centers. This can explain why Congressionals sometimes do some of the crazy things they do, things contrary to their party’s and constituents interests. And when failing to do as bid, it can account for public disclosure of their sins in a way which forces them from office. Government often happens by manipulation and graft more than by reasoned and proper loyalty to the oath of office.
Knowing what is going on is everything, when it comes to targeting. In all cases but the one death, my clients fared better defensively once knowing the 12 steps was involved, and broke all ties. The one situation was well out of control before the client made contact, and ended badly before we had even fully explored his case. Perhaps if he had come to me sooner. Note, by the way, due to a number of mutually impacting personal reasons, I no longer offer such client services. I am, however, happy to answer simple generic questions which do not require in-depth understanding of one’s situation. I also offer a free Helps Kit and other aids via proparanoidgroup at gmail com.

The 1 step solution is also useful in targeting issues

Many TIs will immediately understand this statement: targeting is satanic in method and intent, and its primary target is almost always a Christian, especially if weak or new to struggling with their faith. Less commonly understood, the secondary enemies are the Jew and the Muslim, for all three worship the same God of Abraham, who is the only real enemy Satan has. Yes, there are victims in other categories, including atheists, but in small numbers compared to Christians, et. al. To aid understanding, consider that all forms of mind control cause an increase in activity of those portions of the brain used in negative and sinful thoughts, moods, and actions, while suppressing those portions used for good, specifically to include prayer and meditation.
Conversely, as you might rightly deduce, prayer and meditation achieve the exact opposite.
I devote a whole chapter in my book, MC Realities, on the role played by faith in God in mounting a proper defensive campaign against targeting. It shows in clear terms just exactly how and why something as simple as PROPERLY (very easy to do it incorrectly) applying scripture and prayer can have stark and powerful results. It includes both the theological and the scientific explanations as to how that can be so. It should therefore be no surprise that a 12-step can be replaced with the same principles. Instead of applying it against targeting, it is instead simply applied against the ‘enemy’ for which a particular 12 Step Program might hold promise of relief. AND YET, IT CAN BE APPLIED AGAINST TARGETING ISSUES, TOO!
I make that chapter available free of charge on request: proparanoidgroup at gmail com.
What do I mean by ‘issues?’ The issues are the psychological harms of targeting; fear, anger, withdrawal, outbursts, hatreds, and so forth (things from the ‘dark’ side of the brain). These things work together to foster hyper vigilance, a form of paranoia, which can over time grow to exhibit or mimic schizophrenia, where everyone and everything is ‘targeting,’ when it cannot be so. Many think the goal of targeting is murder by slow death or suicide. The actual goal in most cases is simply to make the TI seem insane, and actually to drive them well into that state of mind. Suicide is merely an unhappy proof of success.
To fare well defensively, one must be able to ignore things which are not truly a threat (simply manipulative), and focus only on those things which are (especially those things which cause physiological or financial harms), or which might lead to learning more about the who, why, and how of the targeting — the things useful in mounting defensive and even offensive strategies. All else is a waste of life, and a destroyer of free will. By that, I mean that the TI does what is expected of them by their enemy, not what is useful to the self. Yet so often, I see TIs who would rather spend their time worrying about every single thing every single moment, and complaining about it constantly, instead of working in an organized manner that might better their standing.
Let me tell you how well it can work, both as 12 step substitute, and in targeting…
My personal testimony: I am an alcoholic. That is a medical fact. I exhibit every single trait or warning sign. However, unlike members of Alcoholics Anonymous, the first-ever 12-step, I am able to drink without fear of falling off the wagon. I am in full control, and can drink socially, or for the matter, simply drink for the taste — I love a couple of Margaritas with meals each week, and I might take a single or double Shot of really good aged Scotch once every couple of months. I never get drink for a buzz or to get drunk. I have replaced any ‘need’ with simple moderation. I’ve been doing it for more than a decade.
In like manner, I’ve historically had a problem with pornography. I’ve spent countless hours each week chasing after some elusive fantasy which life was unable to provide in reality. No more. I am actually amused to say I can launch a porn movie on one of my screens, and work or play a game in the other, and not be drawn to the lurid screen by temptation. But if attention is drawn by something unusual in periphery, it is for no more than a reflexive glance, no matter how ‘hot’ the action. That dual-screen game was something I did to test myself, to see if I was cured. Poof! All done!
Both of these were serious threats to my wellbeing in many ways. No need to visit all of that. The important thing is, how easy it was to stop, essentially Cold Turkey, with JUST ONE SIMPLE STEP. Obviously, any physiological aftermath such as from cold-turkey ending of a drug addiction (or nicotine) will still need to be dealt with. But even after ‘drying out,’ an addict will still have the urges and temptations, and the worry about ‘falling off the wagon.’ THAT is what the 12-step is designed to address, and why the buddy system can be of great value, and why, once you join, you need to continue, FOR LIFE. With the one-step, you instead rely on medical advice and help for the short-term physiological aftermath.
Though Christian-based and thousands of years old, it is not quite like what you would expect, and certainly not exactly like any faith-based attempts you may have already seen fail. And, it works: it even helped me with my own targeting experiences. The simplest explanation is that it allowed me to stop knee-jerk reactions and to focus only on those things which enabled victory. Three times in my life I’ve been targeted, and all three times, I ended it through defensive and offensive efforts which would not have been possible, otherwise. The details are in my books.
As to the one-step, itself, explaining that is a lot harder than is the doing. Why? Because I would need to address endless questions about this, that, and the other aspect, as rightful Doubting Thomas, or apprehensive skeptic, might have — especially if unsuccessfully having tried something thought to be ‘similar,’ before. You would want it to fit the knowledge into the context of YOUR situation. It would make this blog more like a book chapter, to deal with all of that. Instead, I’m going to refer you to a couple of videos that provide those answers. They will move you, and motivate you, and educate you — and more to the point, allow YOU to fit it to your situation, be it targeting, or something else.
The first will show you who you really are on the stage of life, and open your eyes in ways you had not previously considered about Christian faith, even if well grounded theologically. It is an 11 minute mind grabber simply called The Gospel, but it is not going to be what you expect. It will give you the foundation within which the second video will have meaningful context. Watch it!
The second is actually a sermon delivered by the same man who’s voice you heard in the first video. He is Pastor Eric Ludy of the Ellerslie Campus, which is devoted to training missionaries and teaching Bible-based living. While you can bet no one there has any inkling about mind control or much to do with dealing with addictions, this sermon can easily apply to any addiction/abuse issue a 12-step might address, as well as to the emotional and psychological woes imposed by targeting. The ONE STEP is revealed in depth.
The title is Overcoming Sin. Any addiction/abuse problem is sin. Targeting is sin. The TI is induced by targeting into sin. Therefore, the solution is to overcome sin, in all these cases, and likely, many more in our daily lives. This is the secret that I’ve never heard any other theologian reveal, and never found in any book, though a casual glance might leave one thinking it identical in nature. In nature, yes, but fullness, no. I promise you, that if you endure the full 1.5 hour presentation, you will walk away amazed and eager to apply what you have learned. You WILL thank God! BAM! Just like that. Watch it!
As you do, keep these thoughts in mind…
  • The sermon uses the topic of powers and principalities of ancient times to frame the lesson… and both addiction/abuse and targeting are born of powers and principalities, as is all sin…
  • An addict/abuser ‘worships’ their particular sin of consequence…
  • A TI ‘worships’ (by constant worried attention) their targeting issues of consequence (equating to sin)…
  • Bending the knee to Assyria in the sermon equates to giving in to sin…
  • So (the Pharaoh of Egypt) equates to you (your flesh, the Old Man) and your inadequate will power to resist sin…
  • Which in turn equates to buying into the enemy’s (sin) Press Releases (that they cannot be resisted) wholeheartedly, accepting the belief the enemy cannot be overcome, by or of ourselves…
  • If you listen carefully, you will hear echoes of 12-step program dialogs! They simply borrow the truth and apply it in their own way… and with respect to targeting, twist it to meet their own ends.
The above will help you to get more out of the sermon for the topical purposes of this post. If you get value from the sermon, you can find other of his sermons, here.
You may also benefit from select other posts related to targeting:

‘Seeing Through’ NWO ‘Illumination’


The Antichrist is coming, and there needs to be a throne ready for him to occupy. Thus the New World Order is stepping up its one-world government effort and increasing their visibility in the process… and translucence… which equates to luciferian Illuminati-like illumination… often in the form of giant glass pyramids.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2017, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.
 

 

What you will learn from this post:

  • the Illuminati, Freemasons, Knights Templar, & Round Table Groups are the NWO;
  • with the same fascination with ancient mysticism, occult, and numerology;
  • and the same desire to associate their works with symbolism such as the pyramid;
  • that they have been building pyramids seeking to employ mystical aspects similar to Cheops, the grandest of Egyptian pyramids;
  • said pyramids sharing commonalities in occult alignments and numerological peculiarities;
  • where one complex of pyramids is tied to a rather interesting conspiracy Egyptian in nature;
  • and another complex of pyramids appears to involve hi-tech mind control;
  • and is itself apparently aligned with all pyramids in Europe, and likely, elsewhere!

x

The Source of Illumination is darkness…

In several of my books touching upon aspects of the New World Order, I carefully point out the important role played by Freemasons and their involvement with the dark occult and, primarily, ancient Egyptian mysticism and numerology (specifically, where numbers can translate into meanings with magical powers of manifestation). I am not talking about the rank and file lodge members duped into thinking it merely a benevolent fraternal organization, but of the satanic High Masons and select Masonic operational organs which operate secretly, within. The satanic Illuminati, for instance, sprang out of and followed Masonic constructs and principles… and it was they who officially launched the New World Order movement in 1776, their goal to destroy all governments and religions, to replace with their own, providing a seat for the Antichrist. We can also thank them, and head Mason and avowed satanist, Albert Pike, for the KKK, and more.

It seems quite apparent to those who study the nature of Globalists who seek the N.W.O., that they are usually High Masons, satanists or otherwise steeped in the occult. They are often members of or work through the so-called Round Table Groups, such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, the Club of Rome… groups made up of power moguls who control corporations and whole industries, government agencies and military power, and media and education. These, collectively, can be called Globalists, because they seek a one-world government, which is needed in order to seat the Antichrist.

In their works, they frequently employ the same symbolism and engage in occult events right along side of others of their ilk (i.e., Bohemian Grove). While what they believe (occult) should seem silly to a rational person, I remind the reader that it does not matter what you believe to be true, or false… it only matters what they believe. If you fail to acknowledge their beliefs as part and parcel of their modus operandi, you will fail to recognize them and their works, and be unprepared for their plans as they unfold. And much has unfolded, in plain sight.

cheopsHere, I will focus on one small aspect of their existence which is quite central to their beliefs; one of their most sacred of visual icons, the Egyptian Pyramids. Pyramids, especially the largest, Cheops, are as important to the Masonic underpinnings of the NWO as is the Cross to Christians. More so, in fact, as it is far more than mere symbol, to them; it is a powerful tool, and their fascination with ancient Egyptian mythology is quite anchored in Cheops. One need only look at the pyramid found on the obverse of the Dollar Bill and its all-seeing eye, to find a stark example. Of late, for a variety of disparate but coincidental reasons, I have made more recent observations which relate to this notion… things which you can easily verify yourself by use of Google Earth.

Square one, the base lines of Cheops

Cheops is the largest of the Egyptian pyramids, having many astrological alignments and dimensional (numerological) mysteries, among them being it was said to have been located at the the center of all land mass; it’s axis therefore dividing the known Earth at the time into quarters; Cheops baselines were aligned due North/South/East/West. As the N.W.O. players gain in power and ability to establish a one-world government (needed if there is to be a single leader in the person of the Antichrist), they also become more blatantly visible as such a force, which means it more frequently relies upon ancient symbolism in its workings.

So, then, I wondered… might there be more than a few NWO pyramids being ‘hidden in plain sight’?

There are, of course, many pyramids around the World, especially the ancient stone variety. These come in two flavors; the Egyptian, the biggies with their seemingly smooth triangular shapes (as seen at a bit of distance), and the Mayan/Aztec stepped structures, a style not unknown in Egypt, and elsewhere for the matter. The Masons have only an interest in the former, it seems, but my curiosity was about much newer structures, those built with modern methods and materials. Would the many newer pyramids around the World exhibit traits similar to Cheops, such as alignments or dimensions of occult significance?

Absolutely. And why not? A glass pyramid is the perfect embodiment of both the ancient pyramid mythos and of Satan; sunlight reflecting from within and without by day, and electric light glowing from within by night — all work to render them both translucent and illuminated, with bright glaring highlights akin to the all-seeing eye, depending on one’s viewpoint and the angle of lighting/reflection. As a work of man, they are both awe inspiring and mysterious, working on the subconscious in unfathomable primal ways not sensed by the conscious mind without pause and consideration. Even so, one is apt to embrace and bask in their presence despite any darker connotations, for they are undeniably beautiful works of architectural ‘art.’

So let us pause and consider with conscious effort…

Square 2: a review of new pyramids around the World

There have been more than 50 new/modern pyramids quietly built around the World in the last several decades, most of them made of glass and metal, and strangely, more than half of them in North America. A couple are faux pyramids with incomplete architecture in and of their own, but one included a second pyramid on site, and the other had a completed pyramid at top, and so, were included in the study. The idea was to see if their base lines or diagonals aligned with other pyramids (ancient or modern), or if any three or more centers or corners might align. Examinations for numerological meanings were also to be considered, early on, but the growing number of pyramids made that effort too monumental. Still, some interesting discoveries along that line were made.

I found so many alignments (almost 150) and associated numerical translations in place that I felt it was appropriate to establish some sort of test group to illustrate the difference between conspiratorial intention and random coincidence. For example, at one point well into the project, EVERY new pyramid except one revealed between two and nine alignments with one-another, and/or with Cheops, itself. One had 18 alignments. So a simple control group was added: some 30 Mayan/Aztec variety, plus nearly 6 inverted modern pyramid structures were added to the study. If these, too, yielded such results, the study could easily be argued as being inconclusive.

But they did not.

Only one formed a single alignment with any other pyramid, new or ancient, and it featured no resulting numerological significance. Clearly, the massive alignments in the new pyramids were intended by the powers that be, those persons behind purchase of the location and setting design criteria as to angular placement, size, and location on the property… especially true when multiple pyramids at the same location (as is the case in ancient Egypt) were undertaken. Therefore, the test groups were excluded in findings, which proved validity of both the methodology and hypothesis. Since only the new pyramids (not inverted) formed alignments, it had to be by intention.

While about a third of the new sites are single pyramid locations, there are several with two or three (like the main pyramids at Cheops), 3 with five pyramids, and one with 8, across nearly 50 locations. I then wondered if perhaps other old, but not ancient pyramids or locations deemed ‘holy’ by the Illumnati might not also offer alignments. Adding a handful of small pyramid burial sites by Masonic persons of wealth and power, as well as the death site of Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati, and the ‘headquarters’ from which he operated his secret cabal proved that notion, as well. I was unable to discern his precise birth place beyond the name of the city (Gotha, which is ironic in its own right, because Weishaupt and the Illuminati were very goth).

At the point where I felt the matter was amply proven, I had by then added eight older sites, typically 100-200 years old, though one dates to 12 BC, in Rome. It is the Pyramid of Cestius, circa 12 BC, at a time when Rome was, like the Templars, enthralled with the mysticism of Egypt. It is a site well known to Templars and Masons. The others are all in Europe, save one in America, and two of them relate directly to the Illuminati; Adam Weishaupt’s grave, the ‘headquarters’ where he planned and executed Illuminati plans, and perhaps the definitive Knights Templar location — Templehof (Templar Temple House), all in Germany. As these last three are not known to have involved pyramids on site, they are only used in scoring other pyramids which align with them, and not evaluated on their own, even though they would score fairly high.

So the alignments created in total involved alignments between ancient, historically old, and modern pyramids. The symbolism and mysticism of such structures by their special alignments, regardless of if rendered in aged stone or in modern metal and glass — are clearly as important to their builders as the function and beauty of their designs. All were starkly beautiful, and quite functional, to be sure; a perfect way to subtly reinforce the notion of luciferian and Masonic imagery upon the subconscious minds of citizens otherwise mesmerized at what they were seeing… especially when illuminated to great advantage by sunlight or voltage.

The problem of useful presentation

But describing all these alignments textually makes for boring reading. I will give just two instances as example, next, as they are quite tied together. It will be the only review of numerological ties, though more like it, exist, and with notable frequency. Trying to present the topic graphically is also challenging for other reasons, but I will attempt that, as well, in a third review. I will then provide a very simplified summary of selected findings to illustrate the scale and nature of alignments found, with a scoring system to relate symbolic spookiness.

But first, a disclaimer is required, because I always challenge any Doubting Thomas’s to duplicate my research before they make any false presumptions as to validity of my findings, and because the research tool involved (Google Earth) has its own technical limitations with which carelessness can impact upon accuracy.

Disclaimer: regarding some figures and claims herein about alignments and measures, accuracy is sometimes more difficult to affirm via Google Earth. Google Earth allows an accuracy to within a meter or so at ground-level, but things can get more complex when one starts trying to plot and measure lines with accuracy to the far side of the globe, and/or where the locations may be nearer to the Poles than Equator, or on/near altitude changes. Satellite images used in Google Earth are sometimes taken at oblique angles on either or both the horizontal and vertical, such that visual distortions of a pyramid can make true angular alignment (in compass degrees) or even measuring its base length, difficult to accurately determine. When dealing with such angular imagery, the center of the pyramid will be other than visually depicted, requiring one to make cross lines corner-to-corner to find the true center. The quality of image can also vary, but generally, line placement accuracy can be determined within 1-3 feet (roughly the line’s width). The images for two sites were so bad that it was impossible to determine if base line/diagonal alignments existed, but at least their location was known with GPS accuracy for the purpose of central alignments.

Additionally, one must take care insure the Pyramid(s) in question are centered in the view, and to reset the ’tilt’ (View > Reset > Tilt) after zooming in, or additional angular errors can be introduced, as the lines one lays for determinations themselves ‘float’ above the ground. In fact, where the pyramid is quite large, one may find the line ‘crawls up the face,’ providing additional distortion which must be defeated. The degree of inaccuracy in any given instance should not unnecessarily render the information herein as invalid; the thrust and intent behind the location and positioning of glass pyramids is clearly not casually undertaken. Also FYI, distances between pyramids herein are rounded figures, if there is no mystical number involved.

Verbal presentation example

841142-500x334Paris features two glass pyramids at the Louvre Museum, one large, one small and inverted, which form alignments to four other sites (the only inverted structure to do so, likely because it additionally features a normal pyramid, as well). There are three much smaller ones, as well, serving as skylights, which I chose to ignore, early on, and then forgot about, later; they would likely have established other alignments, as similar skylights on streets elsewhere, had done.

Two of the alignments at the Louvre are baselines from the larger pyramid to the same pyramid site in Texas, where they also align with the baseline of one, and the diagonal of another of three found there, essentially parallel. Three more alignments exist to three other sites involving three corner/center combinations, one of which is Cheops some 3232 km distant. Masonry’s highest publicly acknowledged ranks are the 32nd and 33rd degrees. The number 3232 is a ‘magic number’ in Satanic numerology, because it is a doublet, which doubles its ‘power’ (amplifies its importance), and because it sums to 55 (another doublet), one divisible by 11 (a doublet which makes 33 three times as powerful), and further sums to make 10. Again, it matters not what you believe about numerology, but what they believe…

And, this is what they believe about these numbers:

In the occult, 5 is the number of the planet. According to one-time head of early freemasonry, and avowed satanist, Alistair Crowley, 11 is “the number of Magick, itself,” and of sin, or evil corruption. 10, on the other hand, is the number of ‘heaven and earth in interaction’ (‘good vs. evil‘), and the symbol of it in the Greek (‘deca’) is the triangle, of which a pyramid employs 4, which means ‘strength and integrity,’ which is certainly a trait of the Pyramid. For the matter, the number 32 relates to ‘inspiring of truth and living by it,’ which is to say… the very promise and implied hope of illumination.  Unfortunately, illumination means something rather different to those with a darker agenda, something closer to that which the serpent spoke of in the Garden of Eden. These are not the only meanings found in general numerology, but the ones preferred by dark occultists.

Extending the base lines of each of the Louvre pyramids westward 3500 m will take you, again in parallel manner, to the center unit of one, and a corner of the other of two glass pyramids built in Westborough, MA, by globalist pharma firm, Astra Zeneca (astra in the occult relates to supernatural weapons). Another line can be drawn from the lower corner of the larger pyramid at Louvre, through the center of the smaller one, there, to pass through the diagonal of the center pyramid of three atop a very Masonic looking Federal Government office building in Ottawa, Canada.

The smaller pyramid in Paris is 2 m shy of being 1/10th the base line dimension of Cheops, while the larger one is two meters more than 1/6th of Cheops. The larger Astra is 1/6th greater than the larger of Paris, and the smaller 1/2 the size of the smaller in Paris. The Ottawa pyramids are 1/4th the size of the largest at the Louvre, and 1/25th of Cheops, and 2 m shy of being 1/2 the smaller Astra. I would love to analyze the actual dimensions of all these, if they were readily available.

In Chile, the resort complex at San Alfonso Del Mar features a giant glass pyramid on the beach with four alignments. It is aligned such that its base line will bisect with the center of one of the lesser stepped Egyptian pyramids. Two more alignments are to diagonals of a pyramid in London, and one in China, 20 km from Hong Kong. A third aligns with the corners of two pyramids in Islamic Astana, Kazakhstan which, though richly expressing Islam in the property’s design, is also rich with Egyptian symbology.

The Chilean Pyramid base is also one/sixth the size of Cheop’s (38.3333 m, a number which is found many times in the fuller study in either location, size, or compass readings of various pyramids). It is located on the 38th Southern Parallel and the 32.32 Meridian. 38 sums to 11 (Magick) but itself can mean ‘Lucifer, the will of the Devil.’ 1/6th = 18%, where 18 = 9+9 (99 doublet) and 3 x 6 (666 triplet — even more powerful than a doublet, and Satan’s name). 18 itself means ‘Oppression, bondage, slavery,’ and = 3 (a ‘perfect number’ meaning fullness) x 6 (the soul of man) = 666 (legend/man/illumination).

A graphical review

Enough textual description; it is too boring and difficult to make sense of. Let’s try graphical, looking at hotel resort complex at Galveston, Texas, which also consisted of three Pyramids. This is one of several with 8 or more alignments, and perhaps the most interesting in terms of just what they align with, and how.

It may help to review what qualifies as ‘aligning,’ so you know what you understand why the lines look the way they do. The alignment must involve at least three points of contact between two distant pyramids, based on corners and centers. A baseline is two points, a diagonal or perpendicular from a baseline through the center being three points, but the distant pyramid must still have at least one such point of alignment, as well. If only one, it must be its center, but aligning with two corners on two different pyramids, there, is another way to align.

There are examples in my study were a baseline, perpendicular, or diagonal aligns with yet another baseline, perpendicular, or diagonal (four to six critical points total); a much harder thing to achieve. In like manner, some can be extended to align with yet other points of other pyramids at a third location; an even more dramatic alignment. I have found as many as five pyramids in three locations involved in a single alignment across the globe… with 14 points of alignment in all. These harder kinds of alignments should be next to impossible by random occurrence. Yet every single pyramid exhibits them.

And we have two such virtual impossibilities illustrated in our visual review at Moody Gardens, in Galveston, TX. Two of them actually involve Cheops, as earlier reference in the textual description, the ultimate of all possible alignments from the Masonic viewpoint. In fact, I find it the second-most interesting of all modern sites, in terms of alignments (the first, at Sauerland, Germany, is impossible to show in this manner as it enjoys 23 alignments. UPDATE: 43 in a row, and I finally stopped bothering!

pyramids.jpg

Galveston Moody Gardens Hotel complex; three pyramids, one pink, one blue, one glass (gray), forming 8 alignments to six pyramids, including two with Cheops!

Clockwise from Noon in the image, we see an align to the Nekoma Air Force Station, an experimental anti-missile defense system long abandoned. What is interesting is that one of it’s seven alignments goes to the only pyramid in South Korea — quite dependent upon U.S. anti-missile technology. That’s interesting, because there is another pyramid in N. Korea, and one of its several aligns goes to the Las Vegas Casino pyramid, which in turn aligns back to the Nekoma site. It is as if both N. and S. Korea are ‘borrowing’ from American military power, after a fashion, to create or reflect a ‘stalemate.’

Next we have two aligns effectively ‘parallel’ to the ‘holiest’ of Masonic pyramids in Egypt, involving a total of nine critical points with three pyramids. There is then an align to the Rock and Roll Hall of fame in Cleveland, OH, where it passes through the center of both pyramids, there (one small, complete pyramid, and one very large incomplete, or faux pyramid. There, the base of the larger less the base of the smaller, is equal to 1/3rd the base of Cheops.

We find an align to a now defunct pyramid on Miamii’s beach. Fairly ordinary as alignments go, it was built as a promotional venue for the international beer company, Heineken. Despite being temporary, it was placed to form at least three alignments on its own. Then, in like manner to the two aligns to Cheops, we have two more going to the two pictured Biosphere pyramids, which, like the two Rock and Roll pyramids bisected with the same line from Moody Gardens, have both of their pyramids bisected with an align from Nekoma (coming full circle, if you will, to form a triangle). In fact, Nekoma is itself involved in a total of 6 such three-way triangles. One of those involves the Miramar retail store, our final align from Moody Gardens, for two such triangles sharing Moody and Nekoma locations. Miramar is the other incomplete faux pyramid, in that only two opposing sides are triangular walls. Miramar, in turn, with two pyramids, forms 6 aligns, including one to the very Masonic Capital grounds of Australia, at Canberra.

So far, we’ve only closely looked at two out of about 50 locations. You can see how hard it is to use either text and/or graphics to reveal it usefully. So let’s now try a different way, and employ a chart with a scoring system designed to rate the comparative ‘spookiness’ factor of a given ancient or historically old site’s alignments with new pyramids or other holy illuminati locations, including each other. To further reduce the clutter, it will then only look at sites which directly connect to them, in even briefer review, sans scoring. The scoring system replaces trying to compute and display the actual odds of the alignment, which would be as high as 10 figures:1, in many cases.

For example, the odds of just a single alignment of the simplest kind, center to baseline, diagonal, or perpendicular or to two corners of two pyramids at destination (earning the lowest possible score of 1 in my scoring scheme) would have actual odds of 202,500:1 against. That is based on the notion of worst case accuracy of 1/10th of a degree of arc… meaning that each pyramid would have 10 x 360 degrees of potentially useful compass positioning, divided by 8, as there are 4 lines the pyramid which establish a total of 8 possible compass vectors. You need to multiply each pyramid by each of the others involved if aligning to another baseline, diagonal, or perpendicular. A baseline to baseline alignment odds would be 164,025,000,000:1 by such reasoning. Such odds are multiplied further by additional alignments at the site. Argh!

Technically, that’s too simple, because angular placement is not the only factor. Size and relative positioning plays a role, too, when two corners/centers of two different pyramids at the same site are involved, but I’m not going there without a super computer!

Now, if you want to argue that the actual accuracy we should using is tighter than that, implying room for error in ‘finding aligns,’ consider for a moment that only one alignment with the Mayan/Aztec pyramids was possible using the same accuracy as I employed. That makes a pretty good case that the alignments were intended regardless of whatever actual accuracy was employed. Even if you allowed for my own human error, there are so many alignments that they could not all have been for my error, given the Mayan/Aztec set enjoyed no similar quantity of errors. But by all means, feel free to correct my math/assumptions if you are of bookmaker caliber in computing odds, but I’m pretty sure I’ve got it right, based on some experience in statistical data analysis; I once ran my own marketing research firm which ran probability studies. No matter: we will use scoring, instead…

Scoring is as follows:

  • center point to corners of two pyramids or a base/diagonal/perpendicular of 1 pyramid (simple alignment) = 1 point for the alignment;
  • base/diagonal/perpendicular to same (complex alignment) = 5 points for the alignment;
  • Bonus 5 points for any parallel alignments or alignments to multiple pyramids of one site to multiple pyramids of another site (parallel/pair alignment);
  • any extended link to an additional pyramid (extended alignment) = alignment score x 5;
  • link to Cheops (Cheops alignment) = x 5;
  • link to other Egyptian pyramids or Illuminati sites (Illuminati alignment) = x 3;
  • link to other historically old sites (Masonic alignment) = x 2;
  • 1 point for each alignment and for each pyramid at site;
  • magic numbers, angles, dimensions, etc., not part of scoring;
  • Cheops gets a bonus of 33 points, Illuminati sites 11 points, Masonic 7 points
  • maximum score limited to 99

Great Pyramid of Giza, Egypt

Egyptian Pyramids 13 aligns w 6 pyramids on site (Δ) = 99 points: 29°58’44.54″ 31°8’3.65″
Complex Parallel to Sauerland (5+5 points), 3 Simple Parallel to Dubai (6×3), 3 to Sauerland (6×3), 2 Simple Parallels to Galveston (6×2), Complex to Niagara Falls (5), Simple to Louvre (1), to Eatonton GA (1), to San Alfonso del Mar Chile (1) 85 total +33 > 99.

x
a580cb07b1ac956d82946b7d61620f36Cestius pyramid in Rome 5 aligns w 1 Δ = 99 points: 41°52’34.97″ 12°28’51.16″
Complex Extended (three times — 4 Δ at 3 sites, in all!) to Manitoba Capitol and on to Miramar Retail (5x5x5x5), Simple Masonic to Karlsruhe Mausoleum (1×2), Simple to Pheonix Jeju S. Korea (1×2 – Phoenix is Masonic/Egyptian), to Sauerland (1), to Portsmouth UK (1) > 99 points

x
de1cc2b8de1458f8253ea7ad9335618eStar pyramid mausoleum Scotland 3 aligns w 1 Δ = 34 points:  56° 7’19.42″  3°56’43.72″
Simple Illuminati Extended to Weishaupt’s grave, to Gold House IL in opposite direction (1x5x5), Simple to Cooperative Bank UK (1) 27 points + 7 Masonic site = 34

x
karlsrhueKarlsruhe pyramid mausoleum 7 aligns w 1 Δ = 27 points: 49° 0’33.22″ 8°24’14.05″
Simple Illuminati to Illuminati HQ (1×5), Simple Masonic to Cestius (1×2), to Kazakh RU (1×2 — rich with masonic/egyptian architecture), Simple to Dubai (1), to Edmonton Capitol (1), to Cal State U. (1) 20 points + 7 Masonic site = 27

x
th-11Bickling mausoleum UK 2 alignments w 1 Δ = 13 points:  52°49’9.01″  1°12’48.36″
Simple Illuminati to Illuminati HQ (1×5), Simple to Sauerland (1) 6 points + 7 Masonic site = 13

x
Graceland-Landscape-Schoenhofen-MonumentSchoenhofen Mausoleum Graceland Chicago 2 alignments w 1 Δ = 13 points: 41°57’33.56″ 87°39’34.09″
Simple Illuminati to Illuminati HQ (1×5), Simple to Sauerland (1) 6 points + 7 Masonic site = 13

 

What follows is a simpler summary of the first few of the destination sites mentioned sites as evaluated from their position…

Sauerland 23 aligns, 8 Δ, Dubai 13 aligns, 5 Δ; Moody at Galveston, 8 aligns, 3 Δ; Niagra Falls 2 aligns, 1 Δ; Louvre 7 aligns, 2 Δ; Etonton GA 2 aligns, 1 Δ; San Alfonzo del Mar 4 aligns, 1 Δ; Manitoba Capitol 9 aligns, 9 Δ treated as a single Δ as they all directly touched one another 3×3, and were each relatively small; Miramar Retail 7 aligns, 2 Δ; Pheonix Jeju S. Korea 6 aligns, 1 Δ (note: N. Korea has a Δ, too).

These are all quite typical of all sites evaluated, globally. The only site which scored 1 (1 align) was a site which has had its 2 pyramids removed/destroyed, disallowing angular alignment determinations, though the center of one of the pyramids was known, allowing an align by that method.

CONSPIRACY ALERT: That site, by the way, is tied to a little known conspiracy surrounding the Nuwabian Nation, an all-egyptian-like community of almost exclusively black people which was seized and razed to the ground by the U.S. and Georgia State and County governments. They were allegedly targeted for being a cult, subversive group, criminal organization, nest of child abusers, or a swindle… depending on who you ask. Seems like everyone had a pet excuse, including YouTube who seems to regularly censor vids on topic for their usual list of fabrications. Note the resemblance in some of the ceremonial dress to masonic lodges such as the Shriners (Nuwabians, like the lodge system, also use the terms, Orders, and Lodges). All Egyptian is wrong, too; they also were adoptively and by blood associated with Native Americans of the Yamassee Federation of Tribes, among them the Seminole.

nuwabian

I count at least 8 pyramids on site before destruction. The black pyramid , as primary ceremonial structure, was the only one I was able to locate, but not know its alignment with any certainty. These people were very serious and deeply involved in their culture building and adherence, despite the amusement park-like construct of their community.

Note on mausoleums: What we see in our review is that the three mausoleums share unique ‘coincidences’ in that each aligns with an Illuminati historic site honoring Weishaupt, and each in turn is honored for having done so by Sauerland aligning with them. There are many such pyramid mausoleums in Europe, America, and a few scattered elsewhere, far too many, in fact, to encourage me to dig further. Regardless, as the very first and only three reviewed all shared these two features, I’ve no doubt that others do, as well. A single Mason could easily undertake a single such alignment to a point of their own choosing, and more modern pyramid builders could easily accommodate at least one or more such mausoleums in their own alignment considerations. This brings us too…

Sauerland, enigma equal to Cheops

sauerland

Sauerland is one of the newest of all sites, a complex of 8 pyramids which appears it may even involve mind control research. It certainly defies normal property development, architectural design, and building contractor norms in several ways. First, its location is on a hill overlooking an industrial park, and despite looking like a luxury retreat, is in fact the corporate campus of biomed tech company, Rayonex Schwingungstechnik (Rayonex Vibration Technology). It started with three pyramids, and has since grown to eight.

Second, the site has an adjacent and extremely unique high observation tower (about 110′ high) which overlooks the pyramids and the valley, just high enough that morning sun could shine through the large holes in the upper level and onto the pyramids, creating unique shadows. This was a trick employed in ancient Egypt using Washington Monument style oblelisks, such that at a certain time, a shadow might point to a secret place within the greater site (as seen in Indiana Jones and the Lost Ark. The tower’s corner shadow does fall over the pyramid property. But, let’s just call that a pipe dream.

You do have a pipe of some sort, don’t you… and a whip and hat?

Third, each building is offset irregularly and apart from each the other with no obvious pattern or reason, and likewise, quite contrary to normal designs, angled one from the other up to 3 degrees or so in compass alignment. It is my belief that this is what enables it to accommodate so many alignments, a thing which would require planing with a fairly complex computer program, to determine. Finally, again unlike most complexes, even where ‘luxury’ is intended, no two buildings are built or designed the same; each has an entirely different layout and appearance, though some features at least look similar. Usually, a cookie cutter approach to keep costs down would be employed. Yes, even in corporate campus design.

Then there is the very small pyramid surrounded by a water feature. I found construction photos that show a drill being used on a hole there, approximately 1 meter wide, with smooth walls. It was associated with an article on geothermal drilling which led to a very interesting YouTube promotional video that is really worth the watch; it will intrigue and educate you. After watching, though, ask yourself if the expense this likely represents would normally be deemed appropriate for a small fish pond? The video seems to address that with a blanket statement, but does it, really?

I learned also, that the small pyramid over that hole is the only one on the property using metal walls. The other, larger pyramids use some kind of unusual looking material which requires special application, according to other construction images I found. The panels used on them might logically be radiographic in nature, designed to limit or enhance radio waves of select frequencies, given the nature of the company’s work, as you shall see. In like manner, I can imagine the holes drilled by that machine could be used to install an array of underground EMF sensors or emitters. The video implies the array of radially and laterally drilled holes provides a series of ‘pipes’ which may in fact be perpendicular to one or more of the pyramids. Just why these possibilities are raised, is covered below.

Also unusual, is that one of the original three pyramids (perhaps more, now) is strictly for therapy use, with ten therapy stations. In each pyramid, a security computer controls all lights, window blinds, and door locks, and though there is no manual switch anywhere within for any of these, each workstation is said to have its own localized control over these features. But the security system computer can override, which makes it a rather creepy place with respect to potential for political control and overbearing security solutions against occupants, Big Brother style… especially if you don’t have authorized access to a workstation. Undoubtedly, there are plenty of security cameras, and I find it disconcerting that some pyramids have no windows, whatsoever — normally a code violation, unless a warehouse or factory. One must ask why so much expense and devotion to therapy and externalized security control over environment would be required? Let’s take a peek, and see.

The answer raises more questions. This is a unique kind of high tech firm. Their product/services would seem to involve mind enhancement, mind bending, or even mind control, but certainly relate to biophysics and therapy of some kind. One or more of those possibilities is very likely; the firm does research in electronic frequencies upon the human body (bioresonance), among other things. According to Wikipedia, bioresonance is all based on pseudoscience, which is a polite term for ‘made up BS by con artists’. Dunno about that, because…

This is also the sort of stuff useful in DEW Weapons for behavioral control (Political Control Technology). Of course, such tech is always researched and funded based on some good it might accomplish, including the combating of electrohypersensitivity, which many TIs suffer from because of their constant DEW targeting, or some preexisting natural sensitivity. I have it, myself. But once a patent is filed and governments or dark-minded NGOs get wind…

museumNow, about that tower… What if it was for security guards overseeing grounds security should an alarm goes off of some sort. The tower does have its own large building which might be suitable to house a security force. Hold that thought in mind while reading the next paragraphs. Turns out it is not just an observation tower, and not just any building. And, while guards might be rather far fetched a notion, there is more to consider.

The pyramid shape is also known as a Frustum by Masons; a shape used by the military in times of old in a manner not unlike a Tank Trap. Like a tank trap, as a shape, it cannot be easily overcome when several are placed together, there being no level foothold between them (a steep V shape), and its sharp corners, especially at the top, inhibiting climbing. More importantly, because its sides are sloped, one cannot hide behind a frustum, if the enemy holds high ground… such as a castle wall… or a high observation tower. Just exploring possibilities, here… but far-fetched or no, it fits the spookiness factor of the place.

But as stated, that’s not all. The platform is merely the top level of what is actually a mine shaft elevator lift. The building is currently a mining museum with access to a huge abandoned mine; they actually take you down into it with hard hat and light, etc. So, like Cheops, there are underground passages beneath the Sauerland pyramids. It is, of course, possible that some of those passages might be remodeled into something else entirely different, like many old mines are, today. It is even possible there are ways to access them from within one or more of the pyramids. Now wouldn’t that be a mystery to discover and explore, whip at the ready? However, all this causes me to hope no one would go drilling a bunch of radial holes over an abandoned mine… if they didn’t know exactly where the mine’s cavities were…

Now, last mystery. Look carefully at the top of the platform at the left corner nearest. No. That’s not a machine gun, though it can potentially be used to ‘shoot.’ It’s appears to be Yagi antenna, normally used to transmit or receive microwave signals in an amplified manner, along a narrowly aimed path. But wait! Where does it aim? At the top of that tower, as high as it is, the thing is aimed squarely at a hillside nearly four times as high as the platform. Useless, as seen. But wait! Just beneath the top rail is a what looks like a motor; the shaft can rotate. At the top is what appears to be a motor at an appropriate angle to change vertical angle. The white object appears to be a housing of a control system operated remotely. I used to sell such systems for video security setups based on microwave relay. Pretty sure of what I’m seeing. And, there is a second pole identical to the first which could be similarly fitted, and which may have been since the photo was taken.

Why would you want that? Well, you might want to tune in distant TV stations, except they don’t broadcast in microwave. You could use it to grab someone’s cell phone signal, if you knew exactly where their phone was, to aim it. There are yagi antennas that can be used for those things, but they would look different. But what if you owned a bioresonance laboratory with some human guinea pigs? What if you could place them in rooms within a pyramid, where the slope of the pyramid was roughly perpendicular to a high mounted, aimable microwave transmitter, such that every subject got exactly the same dose of signal at the same time, or such that you could specifically target a given subject with a unique signal? It would probably look a lot like Sauerland. You think?

I only mention this, because older pictures, before the pyramids were built on site, don’t show such a ‘gun.’

Is it a conspiracy?

If one concludes that it is impossible that by mere chance alone, every modern and non Mayan/Astec-style pyramid should align with other pyramids, including Egyptian… then it has to be by intelligent design by agreed-to planning by a group of many persons with like agenda. That it is done covertly and involves mystical occult reliance… removes it from the realm of benevolent methodology or intent. That these pyramids can be found in countries of opposing political, religious, and ideological beliefs… precisely fits the Illuminati model and game plan established by its founder, and reflected in Morals and Dogma, the ‘Masonic Bible’ written by Albert Pike. That the only persons financially and powerfully placed are able to arrange for such things tend to also be members of Round Table Groups and are often also Freemasons… would seem to cement all these considerations into a single image: that of a conspiracy. That there is the possibility that it even involves mind control is, to say the least, the ultimate and most heinous form of conspiracy.

Every man is entitled therefore, to give any explanation of the symbols and a system of the doctrine that he can render palatable…  Of all the means I know to lead men, the most effectual is a concealed mystery.” Adam Weishaupt

 

 

 

A Private Statistical Review of Targeting Data


TI’s have many commonalities in the nature of their experience… but what if it was the TI’s nature prior to targeting which led to them being selected for targeting? This anonymous poll seeks to identify any patterns which might prove revealing.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2017, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.
 

The common state and nature of TIs prior to targeting?

This post seeks to help identify how TIs are selected for targeting, and why. I write as one who has had personal contact with over 12,000 TIs over roughly 25 years, which has come to some understanding of the answer. But I also write in hopes it can help better my own general understanding, and more importantly, to help individual TIs better understand the true nature of their own targeting. Such information may even prove useful in TI defense, both tactically, and legally. For example, almost all authorities who should be available as helpers to a given TI end up instead presuming them schizophrenic and attempting to persecute them with forced treatment or other forms of harassment — to say nothing of possible in place assets being used in direct targeting.

Such knee-jerk presumptions may prove easier to defeat if we can show the presumed ‘schizophrenia’ is far greater statistically than should be medically possible, it being true that the illness strikes people randomly across the entire spectrum of human existence. If a given class of people with a common personal social circumstance (state and nature) are deemed dramatically more susceptible to the traits of schizophrenia, a logical person should be moved to begin to understand… there are technologies and methods which can cause simulation of those symptoms; mental illness is not the cause, after all.

We must start this dialog  by addressing two points: things already known to be common to all TIs prior to targeting, and the tactical reason or purpose behind the targeting, things which collectively tend to relate concretely to categories of TI abuse. As to the precise methods of targeting and types of technology employed, those vary according to the individual TI, their psychological profile, and many, many circumstantial factors which dictate the most likely path to targeting success. That does not impact this dialog, but all these things are tied together into a cruelly efficient tangled web of mental torture and, all too often, physical pain.

We must attempt to separate ourselves from any personal angst and calmly review the matter objectively, if to gain useful insight. First, I’ll talk about two basic traits which are common to all TIs irrespective of their individual situation or targeting purpose:

Known commonalities and reasons

whyme

Image: fair use manipulation of photos by Rosie Hardy (Flickr)

Prior to targeting, all rank and file TI’s, are either already financially insecure or in a situation where dirty tricks can render them so fairly quickly; it is important that the target be unable to launch a useful and costly technological defense or employ professionals who can do so for them. There can be exceptions in ‘blood line’ families or offspring which employ MK/Monarch type programming to create a dynasty of (actors, political leaders, financial giants, etc.).

The wealthy ones are unable to effectively defend because of their programming, which results in various forms of self-sabotage of the effort, which may in fact include financial destruction. Their programming and resulting sabotage effects the same handicap as not being wealthy. It is this author’s belief that Dennis Quaid, the end of the Hunts, DuPonts, and Hurst family/fortunes evidence this fact. I go into some detail on this (and all aspects of targeting, including defense) in my how-to book, MC Realities.

On the other hand, programmables who are were not wealthy, but simply part of the effort to create Jason Bourneish operatives for the intelligence community or in furtherance of MC research, can also end up being targeted if deemed ‘failures’… which are victims who could not be usefully programmed and deployed. They cost too much in time, effort, and money to simply dispose of them, and because research might find a way to ‘fix them’ at a future point, it is necessary to target them to make them seem insane. That way, should the nature of their being ‘broken’ lead to revealing their true history (programming), they will be ignored as being nuts. They can be corralled at any time for further MK efforts, if needed.

Another commonality to the bulk of TIs is some form of social isolation. That may mean they have a small circle of friends and family, or perhaps there is some existing strife underlying key relationships (i.e., significant others, relatives), especially if living with or in close proximity to them. Targeting almost always includes some destruction or sabotage of personal relationships for the same reasons as financial harms. It wouldn’t do for everyone who they know to both believe and to aid the TI against the perps.

No. One by one, all such allies tend to be alienated by one means or another. The inverse is true of the MK/Monarch. There, not one of their friends or family are not part of the perp circle; everyone in their life has been carefully placed there to guide them (misguide) to a desired state. Even their employment and choices of schooling, living space, etc., is predetermined such that they at least think it was their own decision, but their entire life is little more than traversing a spider’s web and being wrapped in its unescapable cocoon.

 

The purpose of targeting

Now to purpose. It is fairly straightforward. I usually only cite three basic types, but here, I’ll attempt to outline a broader spectrum and to show the subtle differences in targeting aspects and the nature of the TI prior to targeting, things over and above the aforementioned commonalities to all. I should mention that the general purpose of targeting remains constant regardless of type; to render the victim a social, political, and financial zero. The reasons for those needs and resulting emphasis can vary according to the type, however, as is seen:

  1. Guinea Pigs — selected for experimenting with new targeting technology/methods. An ideal candidate would be rather socially disadvantaged, an isolated loner, and it would be advantageous for them to have already had some documented mental health issues resulting in some form of professional care, with or without prescriptions. This more readily allows them to be presumed insane should something go wrong in the experimentation; they will be disbelieved when describing the matter, regardless of any carelessly revealed evidence;
  2. Training fodder — selected to insure the growing army of MC practitioners can be effective with minimal supervision. While it should be said that many perps are themselves MK/Monarch programmables, that is certainly not the only profile. Psychopath and sociopathic personalities are a favorite recruit, and it is important to insure such mental defectives do not run amok, and can exercise restraint. Because mistakes or over-zealous application is a significant risk in the training process, the same victim traits as Guinea Pigs are found common.
  3. Social engineering — efforts against select targets who are either deemed politically incorrect activists, whistleblowers, ‘troublemakers,’ or who are Christians. MC is deeply rooted in satanic principles and can be traced back to the Garden of Eden (in my book). One goal (thankfully seldom realized) against Christians is to get them to destroy their own faith. Rare is it that we find members of any other faith, lest it be Jewish or Muslim, all three being worshipers of the same God of Abraham. Even less common, do we find atheists, unless they be targeted for reasons other than social engineering. As for the troublemakers, the goal is again simply to make them seem insane, and quickly rendered a political zero.
  4. Social engineering — undertaken against society itself, by selecting failed programmables or mentally troubled persons who can be manipulated into acting out in some useful form, such as committing mass shooting gun violence, or other crimes designed to shake confidence in the very nature of our society’s political underpinnings, such as the 2nd Amendment in the cited example. There, are no other requirements for the victim. It is why, there are so many commonalities in these tragic news stories, such as having been in psychiatric care with psychotropics prescribed, but suddenly halted… almost a guaranteed trigger to violence, when combined with MC control.
  5. Joy riding — elected against targets selected only because the perp has decided he didn’t like the victim for some reason, or because of convenience (i.e., next door neighbor). This is undertaken by the errant and out of control perp on their own time, using what they have learned and equipment they have built on their own or stolen. More could be said about them, but does not serve this dialog. As to the victims, they can be anyone, though the joy riding perp will be careful not to violate any of the principles of selection herein described unless truly doing it for spite. If the perp is caught by superiors, the value of continuing the victim in targeting is likely analyzed as well as the value of the perp to the program. This will determine the future of both. The perp may suffer any form of punishment, retraining, or redeployment, and the victim may be released from targeting, or put into the hands of other teams, usually resulting in a marked change in targeting tactics.
  6. National Security — is here mentioned as a type, but except for extremely important whistleblower situations or programmables who fully escape control, it is unheard of among TIs. The traditional target in this category would be a true threat to national security as deemed by the intelligence community or those able to give them orders. We see an example of that in the news, today, where 16 U.S. Embassy members in Cuba have been hit with various DEW and psychological methodology by the Cuban government, likely using very old Soviet tech, or perhaps, their own internally developed systems. WE CAN NOW CITE THIS NEWS AS PROOF THAT MC TARGETING IS REAL; how can media and authorities cite it has happened to our diplomates, but deny it is happening to our citizens ‘because there is no such thing?’

Finding unknown commonalities, and verifying old

Our method here, is simple. A private and anonymous poll. It cannot track your identity, and uses SSL interaction common to things like bank transactions. I must ask that only TIs participate. Politically uninformed sycophants should please refrain from acting like a child; you might learn something by looking at the truth once in a while. We must also bear in mind we are talking about legitimate TI’s, only. Those who are simply mentally ill, the perp pretenders, and the social misfit pretenders seeking sympathy, may or may not, share some of these traits, and are excluded from the dialog, though we must presume many of them may non-the-less participate in the survey and skew the data to some degree.

With that in mind, I offer a series of questions. Consider them and the choices provided carefully before answering, please, and come back later to see results and, in time, an analytical update to this post to attempt making good sense of results. This will follow each poll in the set. I remind you, all answers are based on what things were like in the year prior to targeting first being noticed. There are sixteen different poll issues, so it will take a bit more than a half hour to complete, but should prove very interesting and worth the effort. If pressed for time, come back later.

 

How a TI’s Belief Structure Can Fail Them Dangerously


When TIs find their defensive or offensive tactics failing, it is likely because one or more key aspects believed true of their targeting is a falsehood deliberately created for them: the enemy knows you cannot win a war defending against tactics not in play, if it blinds you to those which are.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2017, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.

What you will learn reading this post:

  • part of targeting includes misleading the TI into false beliefs about their targeting;
  • what constitutes authoritative proofs capable of revealing the truth vs. beliefs;
  • examples of common falsehoods held as true, including scams

The problem

In some 25 years, now, I’ve had contact with more than 12,000 targeted individuals according to my email list. Out of that number, I can count on one hand the number of them who had a correct understanding as to who their enemy was and what tactics were being used against them, and how to combat them successfully. So convinced are most TIs about such misbeliefs, that they often refuse to take advice that would work to better their stance, and instead continue to try things already proven ineffective. Worse, they might simply give up trying, at all.

a6c9413ecef98eb8a5f0859f13e352aa--advertising-flyers-mission-impossible.jpgTargeting is a psychological war, and one largely invented by and often waged by the intelligence community, who live and breath in a World where nothing is what it seems. If there is one thing they know how to do well, it is how to convince their victims that something untrue is true, and something true, is false. Their chief weapon is disinformation, and its ally among the foolish, misinformation. Disinformation offered and accepted as true, is spread rumor like as misinformation by those accepting it. This was, by the way, the heart and method portrayed in the popular TV series, Mission Impossible; a spy agency who typically got what they wanted by getting the enemy to believe in an unreal set of ‘facts.’

Their other primary weapon against TIs is the psychological profile, which tells the enemy exactly how their target will respond to a given circumstance, enabling them to create situations designed to cause a certain conclusive response which builds the false narrative. When things like street theater, surveillance technology, and other targeting methods are combined with the goal to mislead in kind, the victim has almost no chance to come away with anything resembling reality. The other victory this hands the perps, is that it makes it much easier to insure that the victim will be seen as mentally imbalanced by anyone observing or brought into the affair when seeking help. Knowing the enemy’s psyche was also part of Mission Impossible, the show always starting with a summarized dossier on the mission’s target and their weaknesses.

Among the most common falsehoods most TIs presume to be true, but which cannot be true, we find a laundry list of topics sold on the basis of technobable, false credentials of ‘authoritative sources,’ circular references, and a deluge of mantra-like disinfo/misinfo. Some effort will be made, here, to summarize, but first, we need understand what a true authoritative source is, and is not. Should any doubt my summarizations are valid, they must first find an authoritative source to prove me wrong, or they simply continue in the lie with no basis.

 

Authoritative information sources

One cannot well prove a case for targeting technology beliefs based on material provided by a targeted individual or mind control Web site, and certainly, not based on a YouTube or someone’s blog or post. At best, such is hearsay, opinion, or personal belief or suspicion. At worst, it is a complete fabrication, or based upon one. Don’t forget that some TIs are pretenders, some even perps, such that no personal claims can ever be deemed as proofs in and of themselves. The sad truth is, I’ve yet to see more than a handful of ‘proofs’ offered by TIs as to their particulars which would serve them in a court of law. Mind control sites seldom provide actual reference proofs, commonly citing other mind control sites or proofs shown herein as illegitimate. Circular references abound.

No. A credible proof must come from some outside resource which has no reason to be biased and itself be unaffected by targeting or disinformation/misinformation, and which can be backed up with citations as to the source of their information. I’m talking about things like patents, scientific papers, government records, news accounts, and good books by solid researchers of accredited note with usefully referenced footnotes, that their statements can be verified as factual. ONLY those things can be seen as authoritative and, therefore, holding a viable resemblance of truth and reality.

A warning about patents, however: patents can be filed based on imaginary or unworkable technology without proof of concept testing, and get by the patent office. I have some background in patent writing and patent requirements, and have seen such patents on file. Unless a patent relating to Political Control Technology applications is tendered by a major corporation, it would be wise to consider it carefully before making assumptions. The unworkable patents I’ve seen were by individual citizens, only.

Even so, one must be careful. Anyone can write a book or put up a Web site, make a video. In fact, a good deal of disinfo/misinfo comes from books. The best example would be books claiming to expose secrets of mind control by ex intelligence officers. No! No! No! No intelligence officer could safely write such a book without violating a Secrecy Oath or law such as the Official Secrets Act (U.K.) in a way that would get them and their books vanished. So I would never quote or trust a Barry Trower or Robert Duncan.

I do trust and have quoted from works of ex CIA agents, but only because their work was approved by Central Intelligence Agency as NOT violating any oath… because nothing they had written of had not already been reported in media or in the Congressional Record, or other public domain literature. The books were not exposing anything new, but merely confirming it in useful manner. In other words, they were not the true originating source, the opposite of a Trower or Duncan. I also know of one CIA agent who wrote and published an unapproved book, and he was hunted down to the point of exiling himself in Cuba. So how is it that Trower and Duncan are exempt?

So when you read a book, including mine, be skeptical and judgemental: demand good citations as to source. My books are heavily footnoted to aid in that judgement call, and typically include an appendix full of additional proofs. In fact, the third book in my proparanoid series, The Defensive Field Guide, is in part a collection of such proofs and citations in a form useful in dialogs with non believers. In such a use, everything within it is verifiable by the doubter.

And, when you base conclusions on a technical source, such as a patent or scientific paper, you must make sure you understand what you are reading, or do additional research until you do. Certainly do not rely on the conclusions of other persons with no credentials in the field, for they likely do not know any more about it, than you. This is a great source of misinformation, because technical papers to the non technical lay person can be read into any number of wrong conclusions. It’s like asking an atheist to interpret scripture, in a way; the translation will be quite flawed.

And here is a simple test: Google a given topic, such as Remote Neural Monitoring. If the returns features ONLY mind control related sites and the like, you are likely looking at disinfo/misinfo. For one thing, Google has a built in bias against ‘fake news’ which they define as anything contravening the ‘official line.’ The official line is that there is no such thing as mind control, so when all you get is mind control, its fake news they want you to have. No. If it was a real thing, you would have up front the ‘scholarly articles,’ news stories, and the mainstream view on topic… and THEN you might see some mind control sites and the like, as if some kind of discredited ranting from the fringe.

Another simple test: when you see a claim for a technology, IS THERE A LINK to THEIR SOURCE so you can verify the claim? Again using RNM, there are consistent claims it is an NSA technology, but NO ONE is providing links as to how they know this to be the case. With enough research, you find the claim originated from some guy no one ever heard of who claims to be a technologist, and HE (William Starrett) gives no link as to how he happens to know. He does provide a video of Snowden talking about SOMETHING UNRELATED and tries to fit it to his narrative; disinformation. There is another source, Russel Tice, who is another claiming to be an ex intelligencia (NSA) whistleblower akin to Edward Snowden. He, too, cites unrelated technology and relies on Robert Duncan, rather than first-hand knowledge. No thank you; disinformation.

And one final test: does someone offer some magical new age technobable gadget, glass bauble or jewelry, salve, oil, or audio they claim will cure/combat the alleged technology? This crap commonly pops up just as fast as the alleged tech, a remarkable feat given that we are typically five to ten years behind the technological curve, which means we don’t understand the technology even exists, much less how it works, and far less about how to defeat it. Do you really believe a $300 pendant with a picture of you as a child engraved on it will stop imaginary scalar waves?

xWhat distresses me about disinfo/misinfo is how easily it becomes everyday ‘fact’ amid the various TI groups and Web resources. Take, for instance, this image which is being used by several organizations and web sites, including PACTS (People Against Covert Torture and Surveillance) offered as proofs of microwave attacks, and microwave murder. Make no mistake, microwave can kill, and cause horrific burns if misused. But the image is not of a microwave victim, at all. It is a bomb blast victim from the Middle East. If you can’t trust the validity of one image or claim at a Web site, can you trust the validity of any found there?

Did you know you can search for images by dropping an image into the Google search bar? Try it sometime. Its a good way to reveal fake news and disinfo/misinfo.

 

Falsehoods thought true

The following is a summary of commonly accepted false beliefs. Not one of them has any factual basis not originating from the enemy. The right hand dangles a Scorpion about your face after the left hand conceals the poisoned spike used to make you think you’ve been bitten; anti-venom won’t cure the actual poison used.

SEEING THROUGH YOUR EYES

No. Shared Vision is easy to simulate through excellent surveillance, computer hacks, and so forth. The belief is based on scientific papers and news reports, but they reveal the ability requires hundreds of implanted probes in direct contact with the brain by drilling holes or removing the skull cap, all directly connected to a room full of supercomputer. The alternative method also written of in hypothetical papers is to replace or surgically modify the eye to be bionic, complete with video transmitter. This would be a two-three week hospital surgical procedure and recovery. I think a TI would notice any of the above clues, but not one, has; no one is seeing through our eyes. These scientific articles have become the basis for false conclusions by people who fail to understand what they were reading. This is in my books, btw.

READING YOUR MIND

No. Same answer as above, almost identically. However, there is another way to simulate it which approximates the result. There is a documented V2S bio implant called RAATS which can intercept and decode your brain’s EEG signals which represent the 26 phonemes making up the little voice in your head which is you talking to yourself about (whatever), including what you are about to do. It is not mind reading, but it can capture the verbalized thoughts for like result. You can learn to suppress the voice, and foil it. However, it is also a two way system capable of V2S, and remains a threat. This is in my books, as well, as is how to thwart it. See also RNM, next.

REMOTE NEURAL MONITORING

No. This is a good example of misinfo, and disinfo (per previous dialog — there are zero authoritative sources). In addition, some TI’s have tried to misapply technical proofs without understanding what they were reading. Some cite brain to brain technology which requires a supercomputer and for both parties to wear a special helmet in a system which neither reads the mind nor is capable of controlling thoughts; it merely causes muscular reaction. Others cite a similar article talking about controlling a mouse’s motor functions wirelessly, based on light, but it requires brain surgery and again has nothing to do with mind reading, and only controls muscular response.

RNM has been further mismarried and confused with Neural Linguistic Programming. NLP is not mind control, as such, but the mere clever use of words/phrases to confuse someone. It is not technology, but a method employed by magicians to misdirect, and by quick change artists to get more change back than due them. However, it is a skill often taught to CIA agents or acquired by others as a tool towards getting people to cooperate. Elements of it are often used in interrogative procedures. It has no actual relationship to RNM other than a similarity in name… and any such relationship which has been assumed is, in fact, an example of written NLP at work to confuse.

BEING IMPLANTED, FINDING IMPLANTS

No (and yes). Make not mistake, implants are real and often employed. I’ve had one, and it eventually came out on its own, rather a rare outcome. There are tracking implants, pain causing implants, and V2S implants (there are three technological ways to cause V2S, one of which relies on implants). I don’t mean to say implants don’t exist in TIs, but I do maintain many TIs falsely conclude they are implanted as a means to explain why their defenses against other (wrong) technology does not work. We must hope this is the case, because implants are very difficult to detect or combat (remove, kill, shield).

The problem is amplified by wrong beliefs about detection. Countless TIs become victims of scam artists claiming to find implants with cheap RF/EMF detectors which allow the moving of a finger to cause the instrument to ‘indicate’ the presence of an implant, when it is actually only sensing the movement of the finger. “That will be $50, please… do you want me to keep searching for another?”

Detection is not impossible, but RF/EMF is not emitted by most implants, and therefore, they cannot be found by cheap gadgets. Getting a professional with proper gear to scan and to tell you about it is typically next to impossible. X-ray and MRI scanner techs and doctors will seldom share the information, it being thought that they are taught in medical school that implants are a government tool to track terrorists, or similar. A good TSCM (Technical Security CounterMeasures) expert tends to balk at requests to scan, they are almost always ex intelligence agents and prone to not crossing their former employers. They also don’t like to do it because if they find none, they will be disbelieved and accused of lying, and payment will be refused, resulting in litigation. And, btw, they charge an arm and a leg, when the bill is presented.

THEY ARE TRYING TO KILL ME

No. Time was, when someone knew something they should not, became too annoying a squeaky wheel to the ‘system,’ or in some way threatened the plans of the powerful, they would simply kill them. But with the perfection of early mind control experiments post WWII, it was quickly discovered that the best way to keep those secrets (and any others) from being revealed, was to make the pesky risks seem insane. Mind control methods have replaced the ‘wet job’ as the way to deal with potential ‘trouble makers.’ There is now no need to kill someone, and in fact, a mind control victim has great potential as a resource for some future project use as a patsy, as guinea pig in new tech or methodology, or training exercises. It costs a lot of money to MC someone, and so, why destroy the person and the investment? This is one reason why membership in the TI community seems to be ‘for life.’

More than that, MC is all about psychology, and the greatest tool in the arsenal of psychological manipulations is fear. It is easy to make someone think their life is in danger, the ultimate driver of fear. Listen. If they wanted you dead, you would already be long dead. It is just that simple.

There is no profit in a ‘slow kill,’ because it would leave forensic clues that would endanger ongoing operations. Out of my 12,000 TI contactees, easily a third or more thought they were marked for death. Out of those thousands, only one actually died from targeting, and that was seen clearly as accidental and unintended consequence by the perps. Another died of organ failure deemed due to old age (nearly 80), but which was likely augmented by constant DEW. Perhaps a dozen others have died in ways which are reported as accidents (i.e., auto), but which the TI community embraces as murder. Another dozen suicides are blamed on targeting.

Suicide is the ultimate expression of giving up, the ultimate price of failing to defend against the real facts of targeting, and the final proof that the victim has decided to voluntarily give up God’s gift of Free Will and submit to the will of their generally satanic tormentors. When Cancer patients and quadriplegics can fight on and endure with dignity, why would anyone give perps that victory? Because they grew tired of defending against the wrong things with the wrong defenses.

SCALAR WAVES

No. This is a perfect example of technobabble at work. There are zero authoritative articles, certainly none which scientifically address scalar waves, which are alleged to disobey the laws of physics and attributed by some people as being employed in mind control.  The primary proponents and parties attempting via Youtube and Web presentations to ‘prove’ scalar waves (leaving more questions than answers) and tie them into mind control are often the same people selling $300 pendants to ward them off. It is a sham.

SATELLITE TARGETING

No, underscored. Some claim satellite DEW torture. Some claim RNM by satellite, already debunked, above. I’ll devote some time to DEW debunking, but I will admit to the possibility that satellites can potentially be used for area wide mood control or subliminal messaging, ONLY. You can in theory broadcast EEG signals and embed subliminal messages within communications signals. This is known technology such as used in Command Solo aircraft being flown every day over the U.S. and elsewhere.

This use of satellites is mere speculation, however, but I’d not be surprised. Command Solo flies training missions every day over US cities, and not even the operators know what is in the ‘training’ tapes being broadcast. The military has admitted the technology was used to sway Bosnian elections, and to cause Iraqi soldiers to surrender in droves, sometimes to small camera mounted drones. Given the number of butthurt Democrats who have waxed violent over the elections, it appears SOMETHING has driven a good number of people beyond the edge of acceptable and normal behavior.

Why DEW attacks are not possible by satellite: Any beamed energy, other than lasers, falls off at the square of the distance. A cell tower transmitter is good to about 2~5 miles with a relatively small emitter. At the height of satellites, the amount of power required to broadcast a microwave beam to earth and have it strong enough to penetrate buildings to hit an individual would likely require a power source far too large to fit in a satellite. Powerful land communications microwaves, broadcast at seriously high energy levels with a huge emitter, have a typical maximum range of about 40 miles. Satellites are typically some 22,000 miles high, or higher.

7327orig.jpgThe harder challenge is associated with transmitter size to handle that power. Microwave communications towers require transmitters typically in the range of 8 to 18 feet in size to punch towards 40 miles. To do fire a signal 22,000 miles would take units far too large to launch. But the bigger hurdle is accuracy, given that in order to maintain the illusion of insanity, you would not want anyone nearby to be hit with a beam (collateral damage). The best military grade GPS is accurate only to about 12 feet, which means a plus or minus error of about 10 feet for the center of beam, and the beam width would be much wider than was the transmitter. Bystanders many yards away, or further, would notice the same targeting effects.

But suppose it could be done? The next problem is cost and client (TI) servicing. A typical military or intelligence satellite can only target ONE client at a time. Given the size required for DEW targeting, certainly only one. Yet how many TIs think they are targeted by satellite? There would need be thousands of such birds, but there are not even one thousand satellites in total from all nations on Earth for all purposes, inclusive. Each satellite costs roughly a half billion dollars to launch, and about $15M a year to maintain, hardly cost effective when a perp with a modified microwave oven-style weapon can do the same job from a nearby building for a few thousand dollars a month.

What about availability? There are zero satellites in geostationary orbit over the United States which are not communications or weather satellites; the military and intelligence community only use orbiting satellites. That is another inefficiency for targeting individuals, because it would only be overhead for targeting for a few moments several times a day. How many TIs can claim targeting on a regular schedule that fits that?

Satellite targeting makes no sense either technically, or financially. It is a fantasy of convenience to the greater targeting movement fostered by Robert Duncan and Barry Trower. If people believe in satellite targeting, they will stop trying to learn the truth, and stop trying to defend themselves, as there is ‘no way to fight satellites.’

True: because they are not at war with you.

 

Smart Phone EMF App No Value to TIs


Targeted Individuals are desperate to find verifiable proof they are electronically targeted. Unfortunately, many turn to cell phone EMF meter apps… which are useless for the purpose. Here is the right way to do it.

 x

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2017, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.
x

What you will learn reading this post…

  x
• Smart phone EMF Apps don’t work they way you think;
• What will work for TI needs;
• The types of threats a meter can see, and cannot see;
• Some common false assumptions TIs make that impact understanding
  x

Smart phone EMF Apps can’t ‘see’ targeting signals

  x
Unknown-10.jpegSmart phones have built-in EMF (b) detectors, which some App makers have taken advantage of to simulate EMF meters. Not quite the same thing. Cell phone detectors are designed to measure the Earth’s natural DC magnetic field in three axis. This allows them to compare sudden changes to ‘compute’ movement of the phone for game interaction. NOTHING MORE, unless you are looking for a large buried iron-bearing rock; same technology as a metal detector, just less sensitive. The detectors can also be used in other Apps, such as levels and compasses.
  x
To see targeting EMF and RF, you need a meter designed to measure RF and fields generated by 60 cycle electrical equipment, and the kind of EMF they generate. Such meters, unlike cell phones, are intended to be aimed directionally at a given source; they can show you where a signal originates. This is perhaps the best reason to own one. Some are type B (preferred), and some are not, to make them cheaper, and somewhat less useful.
  x
Preferably, it should have a very broad band of frequency sensitivity, because there are many kinds of targeting tech, most of which can generate symptoms which mislead the victim into false presumptions about which kind of an attack they are dealing with. A meter with a broad band can better define the type of attack correctly. Unfortunately, low cost meters will not see bands broad enough to deal directly deal with or identify microwave the way a TI would like. Some meters, such as those mentioned herein, can still read and quantify their energy, however.

You have to know what you are looking for

 x
You must choose your meter based on the kind of attack(s) you suffer. You can’t scan for an attack which does not exist, either because you think its one kind of attack, but its another, or because there is no such technology in play. The real problem is, that very few TI’s actually know precisely what kind of attacks signals are levied against them… save V2S and microwave burns, which are pretty unmistakable. Out of 12,000 TIs I’ve dealt with over several decades, I can count the number who correctly understood the technical truth of their problem on one hand. And  there are several reasons why that is true.
For one thing, many symptoms can often be the same regardless of tech employed. I break symptoms down in my book, MC Realities. For another, the enemy will invariably seek to insure you get it wrong, by leaving false clues or having fake TI personna give you bad advice, and by employing professional dissinformation methods, to include phony retired intelligence agents who ‘come clean’ and ‘expose’ the technology. Never happened. They do this because they know you can’t fight them if you respond with the wrong weapons/methods, and because it makes you look insane to professionals from whom you might seek help (i.e., Cops, Lawyers, PIs, Doctors). Then, well meaning TI’s spread that disinformation as gospel, and muddy the waters further with their own versions. Here is a great example:
x
A lot of TIs think Remote Neural Monitoring is an attack tech that reads their mind or puts thoughts into one’s head, or that it has something to do with satellites, and fully a half-dozen other things it does or relates to. The Web is awash with countless pages saying RNM is mind control of this, that, or another flavor, but not one of them is an authoritative source citing the truth. NO, it is not, does not. RNM as a term relates to nothing a TI ought worry about, at least currently; it is based on use of a room full of super computer power directly wired to countless electrodes physically attached to the head of the subject, and does not directly read thoughts. It instead catalogs the brain wave patterns ALONG WITH the user’s verbalized thoughts.
  x
Subsequently, the computer can then compare brainwaves against known thoughts to find matches. It cannot put thoughts into the user’s head, and it hardly qualifies for field use against unwitting persons as political control technology. Some efforts along this line have also managed low quality video depictions of what the subject was seeing. In order to do that, they had to remove the skull cap of the victim, a Cat, and put over 1,000 probes directly into the brain, causing the Cat to die fairly soon afterwards. The term RNM has been misused and spread by TIs mislead by disinformation or persons who did not understand what they were reading in a scientific report, or description thereof in media. The term RNM was never even used in the scientific papers, but popped up in a news article summarizing the paper. From there, it was hijacked to become a fiction.
 x
Note: there is ALSO a patent often cited as proof of RNM, even in other patents, and in books by disinformationalists — which would SEEM to be as claimed, and which is the basis for ‘satelite targeting’ claims (along with ‘exposed truth’ by ‘ex intelligence types’). But in fact, the baseline patent, as well as any relying upon it, are bogus, in that it/they cannot work as described. It must be presumed the patent office took their word for it; if the reviewing staff at the patent office were not technically up on radio frequency technology, they might not have spotted the flaw. Patent #US3591134 A Apparatus and Method for Remotely Monitoring and Altering Brain Waves… essentially beams two radio waves at the brain, and expects the brain’s own radio frequencies to be modulated onto the them, and then captured by a radio receiver for processing, analyzing, and optionally then modifying and beaming them back yet again into the brain to alter thought.
x
CAN’T WORK: radio waves don’t modulate one another. If they did, all radio waves would carry the signals of all other radio waves, and AM/FM radios would not work, they would be confused. Modulation is achieved by electronic circuitry BEFORE broadcast; exactly what AM and FM radio does; audio is modulated onto the broadcast frequency, and decoded in the radio. If this patent, and remaining patents based upon it actually worked, they would be picking up not only the original signal, but modulated signals from every radio signal out there, and every brain within range, and be unable to separate one from another. Exactly this protest has been made on this patent, and the patent is no longer in force. It is presumed someone thought they had a great idea, and patented it without proof of concept, because they could not afford to develop working prototypes, and in hopes someone who could afford it, would pay them for patent rights, to do so. The same is likely true of the patents based upon it. Who knows? Perhaps the patent was actually itself a disinformation effort.
x
And while we are on topic, satelite targeting also does not exist, at least not the way most TIs believe. A Satelite is too expensive to target an individual, for one thing. To do so, it would need to be tasked, taking it away from other duties. No TI is so important to justify billions of dollars in hardware just on them, especially given the number of TIs who so beleive. More importantly, its simply not possible. You might be able to broadcast subliminal information or EEG entrainment signals to the entire service area of a Satellite, but not an individual, unless the individual had a satellite dish and decoder built into his head to isolate signals meant for him, alone. Moreover, a satellite could never read an individual’s brainwaves unless the he had a very LARGE and specifically aimed dish in his head.
If a TI were to worry about mind reading or having thoughts put into their head, such does not quite exist, though it can be simulated such that the target presumes it so. That requires an implant, and is not likely to be easily discovered with an EMF meter. All it does is read your brain’s EEG signals for that little voice in your head, which is you talking to yourself. That voice is also used by your EGO to cause you to react badly to stimuli. An implant which reads your brain’s EEG signals representing the 26 phonemes used to make up words can relay that by radio to a computer which can translate it to text in real time. The operator can then respond if desired via the implant using incorporated V2S ‘bonefone’ technology, or perhaps, simulate your own internal voice making you think ‘you’ thought that thought. There is no information or evidence suggesting the later capability exists; it is mere theory, but it is plausible. This implant is known and documented technology.
 x
From my book, MC Realities: I direct you to a Dec. 18, 2000 article from the Albany Times Union, by Andrew Brownstein — a piece entitled University of Albany Suspends Mind Control Implant Research Project. This reveals current working capabilities are well beyond those demonstrated thus far. Excerpts begin — as dramatic a smoking gun as I’ve ever seen… “The University at Albany, N.Y., has shut down a research project investigating the claims of individuals who believe that they were surgically implanted with communications devices which can read and transmit their thoughts. Professor Kathryn Kelley, a fully tenured psychology professor at the University at Albany, has focused her work in recent years on surgically implanted mind control devices. A brief statement released in August by university spokeswoman Mary Fiess said, ‘The university imposed the suspension [of Kelley’s research] because of serious concerns that the experiment did not meet the standards governing such projects on campus. While we work to gather all the facts in this case, we cannot comment further.” …In 1995, gunman Ralph Tortorici held a class of 37 students hostage at the University at Albany, claiming that the government had planted microchips in his body. Tortorici, who shot one of the students during a struggle, reportedly hanged himself in his state prison cell last summer.
920x920.jpgx
In spring of 1998, according to the Times Union, the university’s Psychology Department first became aware of Kelley’s interest in mind control technology when she posted a note on her office door announcing a lecture called ‘The Psychology of Invading the Self.’ The note reportedly described implant research funded by the National Security Agency and the Department of Defense with an annual budget of $2 billion. The note stated the devices were typically implanted in ‘uninformed, nonconsensual subjects” who were usually ‘federal prisoners and political dissidents.’  The newspaper has since had the article disappear from their files, but other newspaper articles reference the event, which is where I obtained the image.
 x
But there is also an attack tech somewhat similar to RNM’s claimed methodolgy which does not use an implant: EEG entrainment. It operates in the ELF (Extra Low Frequency) RF spectrum at brain wave frequencies, typically 7-15 Hz. This is the tech used to control your wake/sleep/alertness and moods, by sending brainwave patterns as radio signals stronger than your brain’s, causing the brain to ‘adopt’ them. Very few EMF detectors operate this low, and so, are not likely to be able to document such use. I have one, but I had to pay $12,000 for it… and for that money, got a lot more functionality, as well.
 x
At the high end of the spectrum, microwave energies used to cause pain and other dirty tricks can operate beyond the UHF frequencies, between 3 and 300 GHz. Cell phones and wi-fi systems operate in the single digit GHz, but attack signals tend to be somewhere above 6Ghz, and well into double digits. Military systems can be over 50GHz, and into the hundreds. Again, low cost EMF meters cannot ‘see’ these higher frequencies, typically stopping at 3GHz. My $12K system can see to 12GHz, and is therefore still inadequate for all situations. But many meters, like the Trifield (.com) can at least see the ENERGY put out by such systems, and can therefore still be useful to know they are in use. They just can’t specify the frequency involved.
x
 x

How you use a meter is important

You should hold the meter flat looking down on it, and aim it at a suspect source. Stand and rotate rather slowly to find hot spots which represent suspect sources, for closer study. Move in on these — the closer you are, the more accurate and higher the reading will be; RF energy readings normally fall off at the square of the distance. Learn more about meters, use, and related issues not covered, here, from this earlier post. It includes, for example, information about stray voltage, smart meters, and relates the importance to a TI of EGO in the matter. Some information in that post is duplicated, here, to insure it is not overlooked.
 x
TrifieldMeterI very much like and used to sell the TriField — get the cheaper one, the more expensive one is trickier to use by a novice. I also used and sold the MicroAlert, same source, because you can set it for an attack threshold and it will automatically sound an alarm (pulsing beeps). When I was under attack, my bird actually learned to ‘beep’ back at it, it went off so often. Had to move the bird so I wouldn’t get the two confused; at that high a pitch, I couldn’t tell the source direction.microalert2
 x
Don’t aim meters upward unless there is something there you find suspect; the sky is full of RF energy which will invalidate reading usefulness. Take a reading of the suspect item and then compare by aiming at the same upward angle elsewhere, and subtract that reading to get the difference, which is the actual number of concern. Again, get as close as you can.
 x
Keep your fingers away from the business end of a meter, or your body will alter the reading. This is the trick used by fake implant finders. They choose a meter that has an audible threshold alarm like the Smart Alert, but fancier and more technical looking so they, as ‘experts,’ seem ‘smarter and more capable.’ They set the threshold such that they can move a finger set it off on cue, to ‘find’ an implant. “$50, please, shall I continue looking?”
 x
The truth is, meters are hardly useful to find implants. Unless the implant is broadcasting a radio signal, it is not seen at all. If it is broadcasting, it will be extremely difficult to find it while transmitting for numerous reasons, and unlikely unable to tell the implant signal from ambient RF, much less locate it on the body with any useful accuracy. The best way to find implants is with an MRI whole-body scan, but the trick there is to a) get someone to do a scan for the purpose, and b) get them to tell you they found something unusual. The medical community is not friendly to TI issues any more than are Police — which is to say, they will more likely send you to a psychiatrist for help.
 x
RFMeter-HF35C-L.jpgIf you want to find perp attack sources at distance, spend more and get a meter that accepts or includes a Yagi antenna, which dramatically narrows the angle of view and increases sensitivity at distance (again, signals fall off at the square of the distance). Where the meters mentioned above are well under $200, a meter such as the HF35C (German made: Gigahertz Solutions) with Yagi will tend to start at just under $400, but will be limited to high frequency ranges, only, and will STILL not see well into the microwave bands. So if you bought it or something as good, you should likely also get a TriField or similar, for lower ranges.
 x
Note: Almost always, an attack from distance will involve use of a Yagi system by the enemy. If you use a Yagi, your accuracy in angle of view may be good enough that you can use binoculars to spot their antenna. Scan the whole page of these examples of Yagi, and if you EVER find one of these directly aimed at your home, it is almost guaranteed to be an attack device; no such antenna should be aimed anywhere except at a radio/TV or Wifi broadcast source. They might just be after your wifi, but that is still an attack on you.
 x
In such a case, if you can get eye-witness or video document high RF coming from it, you have potential legal-quality evidence of targeting. Increase the usefulness in court by getting an RF expert to agree in testimony that it is a dangerously high reading, and ideally, to covertly himself identify its frequency and strength with more expensive equipment.
 x
The cheapest way to get a higher microwave readings is still over $1,000; The HFW59D, and you are still limited to 10 GHz. So you see that cost vs. performance into the higher GHz is quite a bell curve. But once you get much beyond a thousand dollars or more, you start to get into actual signal processors, and they tend to have a lot of useful features, such as data recording, safe level warnings, time/date stamps, computer interface, and so forth. And while those things are nice, they add such a complexity that even I balk at the notion, and I’ve taught digital electronics I and II at college level, and developed microwave-based security systems. I keep coming back to the TriField as the best overall low-cost single device solution for TIs at large.
 x
Be aware that there are ‘toys’ on the market which can look like better deals. I’ve seen a $129 meter claiming 8GHz, but it turns out to be nothing much more than an old cell phone using the signal strength indicator of the cell phone, and is non directional in capability; you can see the signal, but can’t tell where it comes from. You can spot this device, because it uses the old stubby cell phone antenna, instead of an actual EMF sensor. I would avoid any device using a cell phone antenna.

Why am I Being Targeted? A Valuable Question for TIs


Being targeted is all about unanswered, yet critical and deeply troubling questions, psychological torture being at least half the intent of targeting. The foremost question is usually ‘Why?’ or ‘Why me?’ There only three answers which matter, and they are not impossible to discern, and knowing can improve one’s ability to resist.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2016, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.
 
What you will learn reading this post:
• there are three primary reasons why TIs are targeted;
• knowing which it is can result in better defensive/offensive strategies;
• it is possible to discern the difference in many cases;
• there used to be a fourth kind, but what it really is will surprise you.
  x

The way it is

Of the 12,000 plus persons reaching out to me over the last two decades because they were being targeted with some form of Political Control Technology (PCT), almost without exception, the first thing asked is ‘Why… why me?’ Naturally, there are endless other questions which are also asked, all of them seemingly unanswerable, and all of them deeply troubling and part of the psychological mind games which are inherent in all forms of mind control.
  x
27419003986.jpegThere were three or four possibilities, and the best answer which could be offered up front was simply to cite those reasons, a generic answer which lead to no peace of mind, and which usually lead to even more difficult to answer questions. And yet, to get to the bottom of things and mount a viable defensive/offensive strategy, such questions needed to be answered; you cannot fight a problem you do not understand.
  x
This is why targeting tactics include significant effort into misleading the TI into thinking all manner of incorrect facts about their targeting. Out of the 12,000, I have only ever encountered perhaps 4 who truly had it right. Defending the wrong problem results in failure, amplifies the power of the mind games through frustration of defeats, and sets the TI up for looking insane (or even driving them to that state), almost always another goal of the targeting, the very means of neutralization, and the best measure of success.
  x
And so, in order to get those answers, I established my free Helps Kit (proparanoidgroup@gmail.com), and its use, in turn, enabled me to offer a variety of for-fee consulting services aimed at formulating appropriate combat tactics. In almost all cases, even if not electing my services, the Kit lead to some improved understanding and ability to withstand targeting. The services almost always amplified that result, and in all-too-few cases, enabled a complete stop of the targeting, usually with some form of remuneration or compensation to the victim through what I term a ‘blackmail insurance policy.’
  x
So YES, it is right to ask why. So let’s look at the generic answer, and see where it leads us.
 x

The Three Answers

I and others used to think in terms of a fourth factor, which at least seemed to be another category, but it is not, by and large. And yet, as we will see, it remains telling and useful. Let’s start with the big three, first.

1) the actual intended use is ‘political,’ which translates as any form of disapproval of the TI which may require punishment or neutralization short of an assassin. Whistle blowers or potential whistle blowers, cult members evicted from, or who quit the cult, etc;
2) ‘experimentation’… extending the state of the art;
3) ‘training.’ Guinea pigs for trainees are targeted in order to achieve across the board predictable efficiency.
   x
What we used to perceive as a fourth reason was sometimes called ‘Joyriding’. In truth, if falls into experimentation, but not upon the TI — upon the perps. Actual joyriding can take place… the unauthorized used of tech/methods for personal gratification… but more than likely, to the abuser, it is in the realm of ‘political,’ to
them at a personal level. But the bulk of joyriding would seem to be experiments upon the perps.
x
93d5bea6cce0329abcf9fc97431684c0.jpgMany perps are themselves TIs, either actual mind control victims or persons (typically sociopaths or psychopaths) who are put into experiments to see how THEY react in a perp situation based on THEIR psychological profile and the specific circumstances of the TI-to-perp interaction/response cycle. In fact, the TI is almost superfluous to the equation, once their suitability has been determined (their profile), and considered a consumable and expendable item in the project — though controls exist to prevent such harms as might result in Police investigations which might defy cover up arrangements.
  x
An easy example is the infamous Yale experiments on authority conducted by (presumed CIA) Psychologist Stanley Milgram, ostensibly funded by CIA under MK-Ultra. There, volunteer students were given the choice of playing teacher or student roles in what was described as a learning experiment, with an observer who was authority over the ‘teacher,’ who was de facto authority over the ‘student.’ The teacher would test the student and punish wrong answers with an electrical shock, increasing the voltage for repeat errors. There were lies in the mix which changed the reality to something else, but in the end, the observer would instruct the teacher to continue the increases in voltage to the level of lethality.
  x
In that study, those playing student were not real student volunteers, but paid actors, and no one was actually being shocked or harmed. But a similar study by Professor Phil Lombardo, the Stanford Prison Experiments, resulted in actual sadistic violence so troubling that it had was made into a motion picture. There, everyone was being studied, but the guards believed only the prisoners were being studied, so the core experiment was focused on them. This experiment, too, is thought to have had government backing of some sort, as this was in the days of COINTEL and COINTELPRO operations by FBI and the U.S. Army under Nixon, a program thought enhanced and behind much of today’s targeting of citizens. In any event, it had been ‘blessed’ by the American Psychiatric Association, which at one time was headed by former CIA mind control scientists (like all such organizations).

Knowing the difference can alter TI tactics

 One needs to fight the right problem. So it is critical to know which reason applies. There are some general defenses which can be used regardless of the form of targeting, but there are also specific defenses which in the end, are likely more productive. While every TI’s situation and circumstances can dramatically impact on exactly HOW to effect such defenses, and especially offensive responses, what follows below are my ‘generic’ answers which are, unfortunately, somewhat simplistic in description. A TI should be very cautious in experimentation trying to find the best way to implement a given solution.
  x
The key most generics which apply to all reasons for targeting, are a bit more straightforward. Chief among them is to increase site security (i.e., pickproof deadbolt on a primary entrance, all other entrances secured such that only breaking and entering is an option — which perps don’t like to do because it leaves physical evidence in support of the victim’s claims of targeting). That can also mean use of video security monitoring systems, security lighting, and so forth. I am not a fan of monitored alarm systems (most such firms have intelligence community ties), but I do like off-the-shelf component alarm systems, perhaps with online monitoring by YOU.
  x
Another generic tactic is to Stop, Think, then Act, instead of simply to react. Instead of reacting to a targeting stimuli or event, STOP: Think about what they want or expect you to do in reaction, and instead, Act (as actor) in some random contrary way. They use your reactions to gauge effectiveness of their methods, and methods are calculated based on your psychological profile. Acting, done believably (don’t over act, don’t elect a totally absurd response) can screw with them in ways which sees them doubting both their methods and the accuracy of your profile, and cause them to retreat to square one, reducing your trouble and giving you a rest period. However, before that happens, you must brace for increased attack levels, until they accept that something is truly wrong.
  x
And, of course, I also advise at least the first two books in the Professional Paranoid series. The Professional Paranoid gives how-to advice with respect to traditional targeting, which is always part of PCT targeting. The second, MC Realities, gives how-to advice about the PCT variety. The third book, The Defensive Field Guide, is simply a compendium of references and resources, primarily educational and especially useful as ‘proofs’ when trying to convince non believers that the technology and history of its use by government is real. Learn more about my books, music, and videos on these kinds of topics using my WordPress pull down menu (page top). Additional blog posts on topic are also available, here.
  x
Political targeting almost always involves a ‘full-court press.’ The victim will likely suffer electronic weapon targeting, gangstalking, dirty tricks designed to destroy all resources, including finances, relationships, and reputation. They tend to be harassed by law enforcement and other civil agencies, and will likely in time discover they have been implanted with various devices to allow tracking, cause pain, provide voices in their head, and perhaps, suffer use of chemicals and gasses. Everyone will seem to turn against them, for they have been turned by the flashing of badges and requests for ‘help’ by ‘investigators’ of some horrible thing (i.e., pedophilia, terrorism, etc.)
  x
The best defense is to determine exactly what thing it is they fear about you such that targeting was justified in their mind (which may be false beliefs about you). It usually has to do with something work related, or if a college student, something witnessed or experienced at school. Knowing the reason for the targeting will give you the who. With the who, why, and how answered, it is often possible to crate that blackmail insurance policy.
  x
But it also may be that you had already been a victim of childhood abuses designed to create split personalities which could be ‘programmed’ to make you into a programmable person (think in terms of a Jason Bourne or Manchurian Candidate). For every Bourne successfully created, there are likely dozens of ‘failures’ which are kept around to become patsies or for fodder in some future plot. Such persons are often targeted to keep them off balance and looking insane in order to prevent exposure of the greater programming project. If you think you might be one of these, contact me for further evaluation.
  x
Experimental targeting almost always does NOT involve a full-court press. It is usually to test a specific PCT or PCT combination. In some cases, this is actually a better experience as a TI, because of that fact. But in other cases, it can mean very exceptional and horrific targeting levels. Where it is the perps who are the subject of the experiment, it is more likely for the TI to have a  yo-yo experience, even seeming lapses in targeting. Finally, another clue is bizarre symptoms atypical from other TIs. This usually means some new, advanced technology is in play. The more ‘crazy sounding’ the experience is, especially against other TI experiences, the more likely is it experimental tech… unless, of course, one actually is schizophrenic. But even that can be a clue (see training targeting, next).
  x
If it is concluded that perps are the true subjects, you can apply the same defense as advised in the training targeting (next). Otherwise, it is hard to give specific advice for something which may not be based on known technology or methods, but it is just as likely to be based on psychological experimentation as it is technical. In the later case, there will be no bizarre experiences (comparatively). In either event, I suggest you contact me and perhaps we can figure out something to try which is based on whatever is going on.
  x
Training targeting will again feature yo-yo symptoms/effects, and perhaps brief lapses in targeting, but the symptoms will not be atypical of other victims. Because it will involve perps who may be ‘stupid’ about important errors that can be made, it is typically used against people who already have some history of mental health treatment. Schizophrenia, paranoia, or extreme schisms are popular ‘excuses’ which can hide any such targeting errors and prevent exposure of the training project. Authorities will presume the mental state of the victim the cause of their complaint, even to the point of ignoring physical evidence, such as burns on the body, which would be thought self inflicted. As in all targeting cases, regardless of type, reason, etc., I advise never to go to authorities unless you have courtroom quality evidence and witnesses or other proofs to counter any notion of mental illness.
  x
Another clue it is training leads to defensive options. One will see a routine change of players, if one can locate the nearby perp operating posts. Training commonly requires at least one ‘instructor’ and one or more ‘trainees’ at a time. They are not family, and are not in the same social or affluence levels, and will tend to seem odd matches for each other, both in dress, and likely, in age. And, there are likely three sets of them to allow three shifts a day (not always – where targeting varies during the day and is consistent at night, the nighttime targeting may be automated), which would mean a lot of coming and going of different people. And, as there will be graduations, there will be a larger cycle of all new people, which may or may not include brief lapses in targeting, or renewed cycles of targeting experience which might be described as starting low and simple, and advancing to high and complex, over time.
 x
The defense is simply to document the comings and goings, and the patterns of electronic attack signals. Rely on video, get license plates, record times, etc. This may enable you to obtain help from authorities, or perhaps to take legal action. But I warn you, the material must be legally compelling, and overwhelming. You will need a lawyer’s advice more than mine.
x

About Death Threats

Many TIs talk about thinking their perps are trying to kill them. Some talk about actual death threats and events which seem to be ‘failed attempts.’ Some reference  deaths which have taken place as ‘suspicious.’ It is true that numerous TIs have died while being targeted. These deaths are not outside of the norms of actuarial tables for a given group of people, given the many tens of thousands of TIs who actively so identify themselves. And as investigator, I have yet to see any compelling evidence of an actual murder, or staged accidents. I know of only one accidental death at the hands of a perp… which would possibly warrant a murder charge… definitely warrant manslaughter charges.
x
So, despite the insistence of TIs, I am equally adamant that murder is not the intent of targeting. Given the resources and skills of who is involved in targeting, if they wanted a person dead, they would be dead. They would not issue a threat or any other kind of warning, they would just get the job done. And, keep in mind that one reason targeting has been developed and deployed for political use is specifically to avoid murders. Murders can result in investigations which have the potential of blowback. But targeting creates a ‘mentally ill plaintiff’ who will be ignored, and is who is therefor a political (and social, financial) zero.
Therefore, where a targeting situation involves such threats, I deem it to mean one of two things. Either the TIs defenses are becoming effective and they seek to deter… using a bluff… in which case it is likely to be in a political targeting situation — or it is part of an experimental targeting project. In all cases, it is a mind game and should be ignored outwardly, while inwardly increasing defensive posture and alertness. If actual attempts are made, that is entirely another matter, and should be documented and likely, taken to law enforcement. Not that they will do anything about it, but it gets it on the record, such that if things become more serious, they might respond appropriately.

Fake News and Its Suppression: Who Benefits?


Fake News is a political weapon which is designed to cut two ways into your freedoms, and send us deeper into the grip of the New World Order. This case study reveals it.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2016, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or link to original posting.
x

What is Fake News?

Depends on who you ask, and when.
x
Were you to ask me or the next guy, say five or ten years ago, the answer would likely be ‘fake news web sites,’ those sites which feature click bait ‘BREAKING!’ headlines which are shockingly unbelievable… but just plausible enough to get you to click. If you bother to Google, you often find the story has already been debunked by someone, or that the image used is other than claimed. You also have to worry about sites like the Onion, which use deliberately over the top ‘fake news’ as a form of politically commentary.
x
The stories found at fake news sites, rich with advertising to make them money for your trouble, offer no cited source, no links to a verifying source, typically have no byline (author) cited, or the author is nobody you ever heard of, and they don’t have an About US, or it is next to useless. Often, the site is truly fake, pretending to look like a legitimate news source, either by name, or outright theft of ‘look and feel’ of a mainstream site (i.e., abcnews.com.co has NOTHING to do with ABC news, despite use of their logo). Channel7news.com has nothing to do with any news station, though designed to look like it does.
x
Were you to ask, today, at least half of the country, would additionally answer, Government, and Mainstream Media. Time and again they have been caught promoting stories proven to be false, always for political reasons. In the most recent Presidential campaign, the bias of media was so extreme and visible, that they no longer bothered to fact check Democrat/Hillary claims, and spent endless time fostering false narratives about Trump, story after story after story.
x
medialies
x
By way of example: If Trump said (and he did) “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’ll be able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” suddenly Hillary and media were claiming Trump was asking Russia to spy on Hillary… twisting the meaning of very clear words intending no such thing, but instead implying Hillary’s sloppy personal server emails were a National Security Risk, already very likely to have been hacked by (anyone who cared to do so), while at the same time highlighting the criminality suspected in the deletion of emails prior to FBI investigation.
x
But if you ask Democrats, or Government, or Media, it is only Web sites which have been critical of THEM or their own ‘news’ stories. They would include Activists and Conspiracy Theorist reviews such as Alex Jones, and actual legitimate news sites which dared go against mainstream in the election, such as FOX News, RT News. Well, I don’t trust FOX to be ‘fair and balanced,’ or ‘unafraid,’ either, but I’ve never seen RT do anything but expose things needing exposing, and reporting verifiable facts, and conduct verbatim interviews without talking over and interrupting, as is common to US mainstream. They would also include virtually all Conservative viewpoint sources, and many neutral sources long accepted as offering verifiable content, such as World Net Daily, Breitbart.
x
The scary part of these lists, which is nothing more than political blacklisting, is that there is a clear focus as to who is being targeted. Yes, they lump in with those they wish to ‘target’ by such labeling, actual fake sites, such as Before Its News and Federal Jack, and that is intended to legitimize via guilt by association inclusion of sites they wish to destroy for political reasons. But when you examine the list, you find out that there is such a focus; it is conservatives (opposed to the current liberal Democrats in power), Orthodox religious sites vocally opposed to select liberal policies, such as abortion, and anyone who faults Global Warming.
x
damlies.jpg
x
In fact, the primary accusation is: “This site publishes information that cannot be validated and that is anti scientific fact.” The grammatical error is theirs (‘that,’ instead of ‘which’). News sites which cite and links to their source can be validated. If you have a problem with the source, go after them. Scientific Fact? What is that? Science continually reverses and revises itself as more is learned over time. When something like Global Warming is involved, where you have legions of scientists who disagree with scientists who have a vested interest in the ‘official science’ for political reasons, the expression ‘anti-science’ is itself propaganda, and disinformation; fake news. Science is only theory until proven and accepted as fact, and that’s clearly not the case when scientists themselves cannot agree, and there is a political agenda involved — in this case the New World Order’s wish to establish Carbon Tax, Carbon Currency, and Carbon Credits.
x
In short, the whole Fake News, as news, in the news, is itself, manufactured Fake News for political purposes. It is so fake, in fact, that many sites listing fake news, do not even identify themselves and tend to pop up overnight, which likely means they are created through the Democrats, Establishment Republicans, George Soros, or their cronies. They, themselves, are fake. Example: fakenewschecker.com
x

How to fight fake news

The problem with fake news as a tactic, even when from media, the Democrat machine, the Establishment Republicans, the CIA or FBI (Agency or individual rogue Agents), George Soros, or from sources in other countries, and of course, professional fake news Web sites, Conspiracy Theorists who don’t know jack, or anyone else… is it is EASY to see if it fake or at least suspect enough to look closer. Do they cite their source with a link? Do they give a byline? Do they dare offer an About Us which is useful?
x
HOWEVER, this only happens (looking closer) if you/we CARE. By heaping fake news upon us continually and endlessly with one thing after another, from fake source after fake source, and through ‘legitimate’ sources, as well — as they have ever since Trump threw his ring into the hat, the defenses of those who support truth and/or trump, or both, are worn down, and we become lax, thinking this, too, shall pass. We stop bothering to look, and presuming that because we see the lie, that others will too, before being hoodwinked. No. They won’t. Apathy and laziness reign.
x
idiots.jpg
x
This is why fake news works; apathy and presumptions allow it to be spread unopposed on social media. The only way to fight it is to relentlessly point it out: “Fake News: no source cited, no links to verify, no author, see what was actually said, here (link).” Or similar. IT IS THEREFORE UP TO EVERY CITIZEN TO REJECT FAKE NEWS, SEEK IT OUT, PROTEST IT, EXPOSE IT, and DECRY THE SOURCES, ALL WHO REPEAT IT, AND ALL WHO BELIEVE IT, ALL WHO BENEFIT BY IT IN THEIR SILENCE.Always check About Us, if they dare have one.
x

Case Study in fake news of the most dangerous and treasonous kind.

 
At the time of this writing, the pushers of the latest and most dangerous fake news are the Democrats, Establishment Republicans, Soros, the current Democrat Government, and George Soros. Their real TARGET AUDIENCE is, in this case, the Electoral College voters who are still being exposed to the avalanche of lies, lies, lies. A lie repeated often enough, in the company of more lies in support, eventually seem as if the truth. The core lie (fake news), is that Trump, Putin, Wikileaks, and select FBI officials conspired against Hillary. Specifically, that Putin hacked the DNC and shared files damaging to Hillary with Wikileaks, in support of Trump, and that Trump conspired with FBI to refute those charges.
x
49279830.cached.jpg
x
It is wholly inconceivable that a Conspiracy can be formed by a single business man, a high ranking FBI agent, the Russians via Putin, and a non partisan Web leaking service (Wikileaks). If they can make enough Electoral College voters believe this lie, the outcome of the election comes into question. The stakes are high, and the hope is that there are enough fools to follow. To believe this latest fake news, you have to believe that:
x
a) that Wikileaks is a tool of Putin, a Fake News story planted by who? The Democrats. Planted when? When Wikileaks releases happened to revolve around Hillary. Who benefits? Democrats/Hillary;
x
b) that Trump bribed people in FBI to refute Russian hacking, a Fake News story planted by who? The Democrats. Planted when? After they lost the election. Who benefits? Democrats/Hillary;
x
c) that Trump and Putin have colluded or that Putin has elected to support Trump over Hillary. Collusion is a Fake News story planted by who? Hillary. Planted when? In the middle of a hard political fight. Who Benefits? Democrats/Hillary. As to wether or not Putin would prefer and support Trump, such is HIS RIGHT, as it is true for every individual and nation on the planet. The U.S. acts to sway elections in other countries, and should expect other countries to seek influence in our own. Hell, we even used mind control on the entire country of Bosnia to sway their elections using Command Solo Aircraft, as admitted by USAF;
x
d) that Putin risked an international incident, and arranged for the DNC computer to be hacked in order to share with Wikileaks, a Fake News story planted by who? The Democrats/Hillary? Planted when? In the heat of the campaign, and again well after they had lost. Who benefits? Democrats/Hillalry. If this was not fake news, why did the ‘honorable’ Democrat Congressmen NOW calling for investigation not call for it on day one? In truth, we now learn, John Podesta’s own personal carelessness with an obvious email phishing ploy lead to the least, and not hacking in the traditional sense as claimed by the Democrats, such that… (see next);
x
e) that all 17 US Intelligence Agencies agree that hacking by the Russians took place and shared with Wikileaks, which means the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the 16 INDEPENDENT agencies beneath it, EACH INDEPENDENTLY came to like conclusion through THEIR INDEPENDENT DETECTION/INVESTIGATION. This includes very unlikely Agencies, such as DEA, Atomic Energy, and each spy arm of the U.S. Military, non of which monitor anything more than those Web resources which impact on THEIR INDIVIDUAL MISSIONS. This Fake News was planted by who? Hillary. When? During the heat of the campaign, and again later, after loosing, renewed by Democrats. Who benefits? Democrats/Hillary. Again, if TRUE THEN, why wait until NOW to get upset about it enough to call for investigation? Email Phishing happens all the time, to everyone, and is way-too easy to detect to have been a sophisticated hacking effort by the Russians. It was Podesta’s stupidity, and nothing, else;
x
DO YOU SEE ANY PATTERN HERE, at all? But wait. We are not done, yet. Who are the other players in EACH and EVERY case? The same liberal media outlets that promoted Democrat/Hillary’s other campaign lies through the campaign. Soros. Many of the same Establishment Republicans who can’t stand loosing power to the People. So, who are the real conspirators, here? If you think about it, every player… Republican and Democrat Establishment, Hillary, controlled media, Soros… they are all part of The New World Order, either as front-line politicians with treasonous intent, or manipulated minions obeying orders.
x
I say Treason, because the NWO seeks above all else to destroy the sovereignty of all nations in favor of a One World Government; when your own congressional members and President seek to abandon your own laws and the Constitution in favor of Global laws contrary to your own, it is destruction of sovereignty, and therefore, Treason. When they are Bilderbergers or members of Skull and Bones or the Round Table Groups, which either require oaths which disavow the Laws of the Land or have policies and/or mission statements which support a One World Government, that is a violation of the Oath of Office, and is Treason.
x

Fake News real goal and threat: Democracy, the Constitution, Freedom

If those in media and government who deem themselves sole authority on what is and is not fake news are allowed to do so, We, The People, are doomed. In the tradition of the New World Order ploy of ‘creating a problem’ in order to ‘provide a solution,’ which was pre determined to achieve a hidden agenda, fake news outcry was launched specifically in order to proved just such a solution. By problem-solution-agenda, I mean that the solution just happens to be ready to go in time for immediate application (strike while the iron is hot… the people are lathered up and ripe for exploitation), and has some draconian underpinnings not readily visible without close scrutiny.
x
Example: As I first exposed in the Professional Paranoid Newsletter, and later in my books, The Patriot Act was already written prior to 9-11. Homeland Security was established secretly two years to the day prior to 9-11, but enabled by the Patriot Act, so it could be immediately ‘activated.’ Now comes fake news, and it, too, has ‘just in time’ legislation already written.
x
And lo and behold, both the House and the Senate have Bills already quietly being passed to counter ‘fake news.’ In the Senate, we have the Countering Disinformation and  Propaganda Act, and in the House, HR6393, part of the Annual Defense Intelligence Authorization Act, which has been amended to target ‘Russian Propaganda’ and, by association, other forms of ‘fake news.’
x
Now, the links provided above by me are deliberately from sites being officially declared by government and media as ‘fake news,’ but I defy you to find anything fake in their reporting. They give you the links to the actual material so you can judge for yourself, and reveal anything fake in their presentation. THAT does not meet my criteria for fake news, but because their report is contrary to the official story government would prefer, essentially whistle-blowing, it meets government’s criteria, and by extension, that of a controlled and biased media.
x
The scary part is this. Both of these acts give the government the power to establish what is effectively a Ministry of Truth (a la Orwell’s 1984), which can ultimately be used to completely shut down all dissenting voice in America and elsewhere, especially on the Web. It also can lead to establishing punishment for saying things publicly which oppose government, a de facto sedition law which inhibits free speech. That is one of things we went to war with King George over. 
x
Add into all this the additional censoring by Google and Facebook, and all you are going to be able to do is ‘guess’ what the truth is. Try using Google or any of the major engines to find something out using controversial or heated topics which oppose the official story. It used to be you got exactly what you requested. But now, you mostly get official versions up front, as if you didn’t really know exactly what to type in what you were looking for, and they figured that out, for you. To find what you are actually looking for, you may have to go pages and pages deep into the results.
x
Example: For this post, I typed in “What did trump really say about russian hacking” which produces almost exclusively opinions about what Trump said, not what he actually said. Even the one which comes close, does not go back to his original quote. It took me quite a long time to actually get back to his original quote. This is censorship for political purposes, in this case reflecting the desired liberal/Democrat and Establishment Republican desire to destroy non establishment Trump. To find the truth, ‘guessing’ will not cut it, and neither will accepting media, Google, or government’s claims, et. al.
x
Dig! Dig! Dig!
x

Related Posts:

Psyops TV: How They Dumb You Down and Set You Up
Fascistbook: The Growing Case for Government Targeting via Social Media
x

Who’s Killing the Bilderbergers?


Some 17 years ago, the Unified Conspiracy Theory was formulated. It was so accurate — it was able to predict in 1999 the 2001 downing of the WTC by jetliners and resulting Middle East Oil Wars, and other major news events. Now it can be seen at work in my newest book on the Bilderbergers — where fact and fiction collide… fatally.

 

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2016, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or link to original posting.
 
Upate Feb. 20, 2017 Paranoia Publishing is set to start shipping hard cover copies of this book as early as first week of March. Amazon will carry it right away. ebook copies available direct from author now at half price ($6 – will return to normal price once hard copy is available) via paypal orders to proparanoidgroup at gmail com. 

What led to this book? The definitive International conspiracy.

After ten years of research into crimes of the New World Order, I began to theorize that the bulk of America’s dark bumps in the night were not simply random crimes by assorted forces for varied agenda, but completely orchestrated as a single, logical, step-wise plan toward a single, yet visible goal. It resulting in the Unified Conspiracy Theory, and it was reasoned that if one knew the goal, and the steps thus far taken, such a plan was predictable, and as a theory, the ultimate test would be to do just that.

The first three predictions made with the UCT were so scary, that I had to take actions, do something… anything I could think of, to attempt to thwart them. The first was, that some kind of terror event would bring down the WTC with jetliners, and result in a series of Middle East Oil Wars. So, in the Fall of 1999, knowing no authorities would bother to respond usefully, or quickly, I published a quickly written screenplay featuring such a plot, and put it online with explanative warnings, hoping against hope it might force any such plan to be aborted. No such luck, of course, even though Oliver Stone’s people took a look at the script in search of a project. They thought it an impossible ‘false flag’ scenario.

 

16819237_985524731587546_4614382031226083422_o.jpg

The second UCT prediction was an assassination attempt on 1992 Independent Presidential Candidate H. Ross Perot, or his family, in order to force him out of the Primary run against Clinton/Bush. I took no chances, and this time, notified the Secret Service of my concerns, expecting they would ask me for details. I used my backchannel contact, someone I had worked with before on several Treasury matters. Some several weeks later, Perot did back out of the election, even though the very night he did so, he had won enough votes to be guaranteed a place on the General Ballot. A few weeks after that, my SS contact confirmed that an attempt had been made just before the Primary, against his family; mailed Anthrax. That has its own telling ‘false flag’ backstory.

The third was that there would be at least two more major false flag attacks to follow, specifically naming the type of attacks, and the cities. One of them was my home town, which I had predicted would suffer a bio-terror attack, and I even identified the means of delivery and rogue CIA Fronts to be used. But by the time frame where that might become a more current concern, I had finished my book set, Fatal Rebirth, which spelled these things out quite clearly, again hoping it might spoil any such plan. I also took steps to notify the City.

Again, no useful results, but fortunately, knowing such details enabled me to personally thwart that attack, or at least postpone it. It is featured on this Blog’s home page.  But I was definitely able to thwart second, different terror attack in the same time frame, likely a Plan B to the former. It was called Gas Station Tasking when announced by President Bush; the use of private planes to dive bomb the area’s largest gas station while a tanker truck was offloading gasoline, at the busiest time of the street traffic day. This is also detailed on the home page.

This could easily have taken out two gas stations, four restaurants, two banks, two two hotels, and potentially, two major shopping complexes, and the traffic on the busiest intersection in the County, plus a major Interstate and two State highways. Identified, were two of FBI’s Top Ten Most Wanted Terrorists, and others, including the Christmas Tree Bombers. They were getting help from an FBI Agent known to me, and so, as it was a false flag operation, FBI, CIA, FAA, DHS, in response to my going public, never asked for my evidence, which included fingerprints, video, multiple eye witness confirmations, and more. The cover up was started before the President even heard about it. See home page.

 

Why UTC matters to this new book

Other UTC predictions have since come to pass, as well. The reason this is all mentioned here, at all, is because the UTC does not just affect America, it relates perfectly to World affairs, as well. And in this world, we have various Round Table Groups of Globalists who push for a One-World Government, which is to say, elements of the modern-day Illuminati. Such groups as the Tri-Lateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Grandaddy of them all, the Bilderbergers, and many more (even United Nations, World Bank, et. al), all tend to be cut from the same New World Order mold.

suiciding-the-bankers

This image relates to one of two strings of real World International murders footnoted in Who’s Killing The Bilderbergers, as cited in this book. From http://humansarefree.com/2016/06/mainstream-media-finally-admits-mass.html

 

Which in turn is to say, largely fascist, all-too often satanic, and decidedly power elitists seeking to rule the World through manipulation and control of (everything), and willing to do so at any cost, by any means. Not to go overboard, it is important to note that, with the exception of the Bilderbergers, most Round Table Groups, like FreeMasonry, attempt to draw in newbie membership who are completely innocent Sheep. This gives surface viability and credibility of these groups to mainstream in ways which allow them to mask the darker roles they play in seeking the Globalist rule, while also giving fresh students to draw into their world, especially the more successful up and comers. There is a backstory there, as well, as I have first hand knowledge, x 2 telling examples, having been such an up and coming business man.

Ergo, this new book is designed to do much the same thing as Fatal Rebirth; to warn you just what these people are doing, and why… and why you should be mad as hell about it and doing something to stop them. Only, my new book is global in scope, where Fatal Rebirth concerned itself only with America. And, while Fatal Rebirth began unfolding in 1947, Who’s Killing the Bilderbergers is a current-day affair. As such, it is perhaps more urgent, that you read it, and soon — because the future is revealed to be bleaker than the Dark Ages and time of the Inquisition, for those not forewarned and forearmed.

 

The plot thickens

I describe this book as ‘an International Novel of Novel International Affairs.’ A grand murder mystery across multiple Continents, trying to resolve mysterious death after death of prominent Globalist leaders. Are they simply random deaths by happenstance, or murders by elaborate design? Officially, they are not due foul play, and yet… each one has many unanswerable questions clouding that view. Just as troubling, their deaths seem to be tied to various strange conspiracy theories, while at the same time tied to various Globalist agenda, either narrative affording motive for murder. And, of course, it is soon enough discovered that they all turn out to be Bilderbergers.

bilderberg.jpg

Each Bilderberger tends to be an Officer or Board Member of multiple corporations, and has sway over yet others through major stock holder positions, or contractual agreements. Of course, many of these companies, in turn, control other companies, sometimes, long lists. Now, imagine what this Cloud Map would look like if we knew the actual identity of ALL Bilderbergers, and not just this handful. Then add CFR, Trilateral Commission, Club of Rome, Council on Foreign Relations, and on, and on; the Round Table Globalists; the modern-day illuminati.

By the time the truth of the deaths starts to be uncovered, the UTC will have started to reveal itself in action. In like manner to UTC’s ability to be predictive, readers will be propelled quickly into the future, headlong into the one final prediction which is the ultimate form of fatal rebirth… for us all. That particular prediction WILLmost certainly come to pass; it has, after all, been foretold by many authors well before my time. Among them, Satanist and high Mason, Adam Weishaupt; it is the entire purpose of and predictive goal of the Illuminati Plan, as he formulated it in 1776, when the group started their journey toward a New World Order (he first coined that term).

As this book reveals, just when it comes to pass, is largely up to you. You, are what you’ve been waiting for. They hope you don’t know that, and remain Sheeple.

 

An important detail

And, along the way to that story-ending element, readers will also encounter countless real-World conspiracies laid at the feet of Bilderbergers, all done in ways which let the individual decide for his or herself, which, if any, may seem fanciful, and which are more likely true.  There is much documentation within the main body, plus more than 150 footnotes (an average of one every page turn), to help that process along. Some of those footnotes are illustrated graphically. The Climax and Ending will then show you the progressional nature of the Globalist plan as it unfolds toward the very last step in the plan, the point of no return for Mankind. These conspiracies back up the UTC usefully, and in fact, understanding them helps refine the UTC more usefully; one tends to validate the other, in both directions.

 

 

 

Like or Hate Me, You May Wish to Quote Me


If I had a dollar, or even a dime for every web page that mentioned or quoted me or my works, I’d be a millionaire: 12 million pages can’t all be wrong; people repeat what I say. Where else but America can you become ‘famous’ for putting your foot in your mouth on a regular basis?

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com    proparanoid.net    facebook

copyright © 2016, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Please comment any such repost to original posting.

 

What you will get by reading this post…

• Silly quotable one liners, gags, and full-on original jokes;

• witty quotable witticisms, wise sayings, criticisms, and other malarky;

• non PC quotable political snipes, barbs, and ruthless rhetoric;

• thoughtful quotable philosophical wisdoms, advice, and beatitudes.

 

My most popular writing today has been copied by permission on hundreds of Web sites, and reproduced in at least a half dozen books. So I know I’m quoted out there. It is even used in college courses on Political Science, Journalism, and Psychology. It’s called the 25 Rules of Disinformation, and includes not just how to spot disinfo, but how to out it and defeat the user in public or private venue.

This post is (mostly) a collection of my most popular Facebook posts. People generally like them, unless on the wrong end of the barb. Even then, the resulting dialogs have been interesting, and we tend to remain friends. But most people on Facebook do not ‘go looking’ for something to read, they let Facebook automatically send them random samplings in their ‘feed.’ It is really best to FOLLOW someone you like (also true of my blog posts); the only way to insure you see everything a given person posts (or blogs), is to follow them (subscribe — click that option now, while you are thinking about it.)

So, even if already a Facebook friend, it is highly unlikely you will have seen very many of what follows: a random grab bag of quotable material. Now, if you do actually choose to quote me, please do cite me as the source, and link either to this blog Page or the whole Site, or my Facebook page. New friends are welcome there, of course. You can quote me on that!

 

Quote on!

You May Wish to Quote Me (I do it all the time)~

If I had a dollar, or even a dime for every web page that mentioned or quoted me or my works, I’d be a millionaire: 12 million pages can’t all be wrong; people like what I say. Where else but America can you become ‘famous’ for putting your foot in your mouth on a regular basis?~

You may have noticed that I’m imminently quotable by the way I continually quote myself, because after all, “I’m imminently quotable.”~

The only good thing about putting my foot in my mouth so often is that I always know if my shoelaces are tied, or knot.~

 

T’was an LL Cool Day
(apologies to LL Cool J)

I saw an Armadillo while visiting Amarillo;
he sat near a willow, upon a satin pillow.
In the sun, bright yellow, this reclining fellow
seemed to be quite mellow, eating a bowl of Jello
while listening to a fellow who played a loud Cello.
Were I to say hello, I feared I must such bellow;
that seemed such a peccadillo, I ne’er met that Armadillo

 

If Google spies on your searches, shouldn’t their name be Goggle?
If Yahoo does, Youwho?
If Facebook tracks your info, Factlook?
If YouTube censors excessively and politically, LubeRube?
If television is propaganda, Tellyourmission?
If a newspaper is the same, Newsfaker?
If the Oval Office is a source of lies and skullduggery, the Shovel Orrafice?~

 

From conversation agent.typepad.com (click for their similar answer to meaning of life)

The meaning of Life? To take all gifts entrusted to you by God; Free Will, life, and the Soul which defines the inner you, and the gifts you earn through life; knowledge, talent, skills, wealth and possessions, experiences and positions… to edify yourself, edify others (family, those above you, your peers, and strangers), and above all, edify God in the doing. This is true Glory, and the source of Blessings.

To the extent you do this, you yourself fabricate that meaning. To the extent you fail to do so, you dilute or even destroy it. Any faults or failures you have along the way are challenges in learning, and otherwise non sequitur to the equation. This is true Faith, and the source of Happiness.

Don’t focus on them, learn from them, and go on. You are what you’ve been waiting for, all along. Stop looking so hard for simple answers, and stop struggling so hard against battles predestined to be won by the righteous. If God be for you, who can be against you? This is the true foundation of Peace, and the source of Strength.

The meaning of life, is YOU, and I’m glad you have friended me. As I wish for me, so I wish for you. Thank you for sharing this Sunday with me.~

 

Wisdom is sometimes knowing how to seem wise without anyone’s means to challenge. After struggling to the top of the mountain to ask my one-allowed question of the Guru, he preempted with an answer: “Yes, my Son,” he said, “you have at last made it to the top. Now leave me in peace.”~

I wonder if Pavlov’s Dog’s got that way eating Pavlum? Probably not, it wouldn’t make me salivate.~

You know your’e an alcoholic and an unpleasant drunk if people invite you to their parties the day after, and you are so sloshed you think you just got back from it.~

I’m sorry, but I think I misunderstood what you wanted me to consider about what you probably meant by saying what you thought I would be able to relate to as allegory to the intended thought you had in mind, but couldn’t articulate because you were afraid I would misconstrue it as something else. What were we talking about, again?~

A dirty joke is to humor in a way exactly like the Presidential election is to politics.~

Rain falls in drops because it’s happy water. When it’s mad, watch out for hail.~

 

Old Crow

Oh, old Crow, so cautious and suspicious,
not like the Goose, who’s calm with aplomb,
your caw is such an appalling loud calling,
unlike parakeets most cheerful earful,
or eagle’s shrill cry from high in the sky.

Your old black cloak does fail to evoke
the visual delight of a Parrot, so bright.
You walk with a hobble and a wobble,
where a Robin bounces and pounces,
and the Stork is stilted and often is tilted.

And though your flight is quite alright,
it’s not as stunning as a Bird, Humming.
Lacking the Hawk’s glide so full of pride,
sans any formation of Geese’ inclination,
nor is it as swift as can be a quick Swift.

Your Murder is a suspect some fear to detect,
and yet, I suspicion, it’s all mere superstition.
Yet do not away rush, my criticisms to hush:
let not any objection be seen as a rejection;
I do like you old Crow, so brag on, and crow.

 

Escape

To escape vile fate I must get past that damned wall;
because if staying here, I’ll not likely survive it at all.
I tried to climb upon it, up high, no good, then higher,
only to find it topped with wickedly sharp razor wire.
I tried to go around it, hoping an opening I would find,
but it surrounds me completely, and I’m trapped inside.

I tried to dig under, tunneling deep, deep underground
but impassable boulders and water did me confound.
To escape my foe I must get past that heartless wall;
I’ve no choice; to give up certainly means my downfall.
I’ve asked for help from all near who might could hear,
they refuse to give aid, yielding to their own dark fear.

I’ve prayed to God to help, to redeem and set me free,
but I’m afraid in here, even He can’t hear me or see.
Then came a gentle voice advising firmly to be still,
“I’m with you always, as is my gift of strong Free Will.
To escape your foe, you must get past that mere wall,
and there is yet one thing you’ve not tied, not at all.”

My thoughts reeled, and the answer came in a flash,
I’d not yet tried attacking head on, the wall to crash.
I gathered my courage and backed up for a good run,
and ran headlong screaming at the top of my lung.
I hit that wall with all my brute force, and hit it hard:
knocking myself unconscious right there in that yard.

To escape my foe, I’ve tried it all, to get past the evil wall;
but nothing has for me worked, no not one, nothing at all.
I awoke quite dazed, my fist clinched in pain and my rage,
the voice had not well helped me, its advice was not sage.
But regaining my feet, a white robed figure there stood tall,
amid the rubble of that same accursed, impassable wall.

“You’ve escaped your foe,” said he, “right through the wall;
not by your strength, nor luck, but that on me you did call.
The miracle you sought was within you right from the start,
your faith in me was all it took; and abiding love in your heart.
If God be for you, no man or thing against you can stand,
when you hit that wall, I was there with you, hand in hand.”

 

Sorry if I insult you. Being poor, I have to go for the cheap shots.~

Any man can toast his friends at the tavern. But a brave man toasts his enemies. That’s why I always carry a can of lighter fluid when I go drinking.~

I never quite chimed in with the 60’s by wearing bell bottom pants – until I got kicked in the groin.~

I’m never inclined to eat carrots. I just can’t see my way to do so.~

 

Linear or Columnar?

A rhythmic rhyme in a single line is often quite fine.
but most like a rhyme
to be of many a line,
or to metrically align; 
be symmetrically sublime,
or perhaps its just fine
to enjoy any old rhyme.

X

Political Risk

I’ll not vote for she who does cackle
when refusing a tough query to tackle.
While not happy with alternative Trump,
he’s still better than a kick in the rump.

While Dems are OK with criminal lies,
and Establishment Reps swarm like flies,
a candidate ripe for an email blackmail
risks a serious national security fail.

 

A lot of drinks call for two fingers of this or that liquor, so I always look for bartenders with really big hands.~

The path to illumination in the darkness is called a sidewalk.~

 

Political Seuss

I do not like this Uncle Sam, I do not like the health care scam.
I do not like these dirty crooks, or how they lie and cook the books!
I do not like when Congress steals, I do not like their secret deals.
I do not like this speaker Nan, I do not like this ‘YES WE CAN’.
I do not like this spending spree, I’m smart, I know that Nothing’s Free!
I do not like their smug replies, when I complain about their lies.
I do not like this kind of hope. I do not like it. nope, nope, nope!

 

There are rarely times when ‘actual’ sex is as good as ‘fantasy’ sex is imagined. However, they both involve a little ‘t’ & ‘a.’~

The only ‘gun control’ I support is that question in the mind of the criminal intent on causing trouble, “Will he remain in control of his fear or temper, or will he pull the trigger.”~

 

Politic’s Ticks

If Trump is such a chump we’d rather dump,
and Uncle Bernie is ample wormy and too squirmy,
and Hillary far too shrillery under FBI drillery,
with liberally bias in the press giving truth no redress…
Does that mean Biden is bid’n his tim’n in decid’n if rid’n
White Knight like last minute to the Demo’s pandemic…
Is that how we’ll be decid’n who’s presidential presid’n?
Is that Obama’s last prick on his way out, his hat trick?
That I won’t at all be abid’n, down too far we’ve been slid’n.

 

Doing

Yes, wine is quite fine when you have the time, or dine,
but weed has more speed if you have the need; do proceed.
The joke for this bloke is that I cannot smoke, nor toke,
and shrink from such drink – an alchoholic’s dread; brink of stink.

Dope lacks hope that I’ll survive or cope its scope,
so here’s my fears (why I’m lacking cheers amid tears):
this guy will die having never daring a high to try.
That hex did vex untill realizing that the Rx is sex!~

Never hiss at a snake; the conversation could be deadly.~

 

Perplexity

Do you know anything of the Entymology of Entomology,
or is it to you as confusing as the synopsis of synapsis?

 

Hillary’s Ruin
(What difference does it make?)

As I have previously stated,
I am quite totally devastated
not to have been reinstated.

I have frequently formulated
and as often have postulated
just why I’m not yet reinstated.

The cause, you see, is equated
with rumors and lies oft related
to prevent my being reinstated.

They shout with glee, as if elated
with prideful egos thus elevated,
for blocking my being reinstated.

They say my claims are overrated,
to a job where I ne’er participated,
and that’s why I can’t be reinstated.

If people died while I simply waited,
shown in lies and emails evaluated,
what difference to being reinstated?

My right, you see, as Royal rated
is for all to worship me unabated,
and vote to have me reinstated.

 

Never apologize to me for being you. Just stop it!~

Why do some of us eat the icing out of the middle of an Oreo? Where else would it be?~

 

Seasonal Orb

I saw last night the thinnest sliver of a silver Moon,
a most pleasant crescent, present this month of June.
So thin that it did quiver and thus scant light deliver,
did I realize before my eyes it would dematerialize.
Now its gone, but before too long, watching for its rise,
to my boon:
 it shall return soon, as a mirror sliver Moon.

 

Rhyme Defined

A simple rhyme takes little time,
a light banter with good cantor –
best if exquisite, expressed explicit;
easy to recall in its all and all.

 

In A Rush

Here”s a quick li’l poem:
done now, I’ll be goin’.

 

What’s wrong with the Mayor of New York, does he not know his soda ban and tax is suppressing Pop Culture?~

Unfortunately for Custer, at least 10 Little Indians never heard that song.~

 

Time Tells No Tales

Once upon a time? No, I’m highly suspicious.
If it only happened once, it must be fictitious,
especially if remarkably good and not malicious:
Real events repeat themselves through history,
written down in pages for study by you and me,
where learning not, we assure repeat eventuality.

X

Dear Fascists

Take heed, look around: here stand I, I stand my ground.
Never again will I back away, here I stand, and here I’ll stay.
Your words will not sway me, no dark threats dissuade me.
Take heed, look around. Here stand I, I stand my ground.

Never again will I back away, here I stand, and here I’ll stay.
No trick or lies, nor treachery will keep me from remaining free.
No unjust laws, cops or military will I respect, still shall I tarry.
Take heed, look around: here stand I, I stand my ground.

Never again will I back away, here I stand, and here I’ll stay.
Surround me with vile forces, I’ll ignore their foul loud voices.
Dare attack me if you will, I’ll reply ten fold until my body’s still.
Take heed, look around: here stand I, I stand my ground.
Never again will I back away, here I stand, and here I’ll stay.

 

They say the Earth’s rotation is slowing down. I have a simple cure. We all get in our cars and face them West, and synchronize burning rubber.~

 

Status Quo: Latin for we want you to think things are equal and as they should be so you
will shut up and do what you are told
.

Parity: French for we want you to think things are the same and as they should be so you
will shut up and do what you are told
.

Equality: Ye olde English for we want you to think things are the same and as they should
be so you will shut up and do what you are told
.

Same: what we mean when we are talking about one political party compared to another,
those people who want us to shut up and do what we are told.

X

I thought of a Hillaryous joke, but I don’t want to keep insulting Democrats.~

 

Social Litmus

Do my witticisms impress you or simply depress you?
Do my jokes make you laugh or think me some Jackass?
Do my poems seem lyrical or are they just predictable?
Do my posts give enlightenment, or seem closer to excrement?
Do you share, like, and follow, or is our friendship just hollow?

X

Smart by Default

Any wisdom I have lies in taking some care
in choosing the friends with whom I will share.
If smarter than me I will make them aware:
I agree with them, and with flattering flair.
If not as smart, then will I then declare,
their inspiring thoughts lead me to dare.

 

A tack pins things down, while pins prick things deeply, but a prick is always tacky, hard to pin down, offending deeply.~

Time for me to post-a-joke. Invented by a stand-up comic, it’s like a Post-it Pad, without any glue to hold it together — so it’s insanely presented in unexpected ways, and it is colorless, unless fucking off color or borrows the color of a racial inference. Wait… that’s a political speech.~

I think I understand the term ‘feedback loop,’ now: GMO crops.~

Shoot first and ask questions later. It saves dialog and you don’t get ambiguous answers… if there are any answers.~

 

Being Outspoken

I’m the first to admit I know so much about everything,
an expert assumed, presumed, or claimed unrelenting.
In truth it seems, I know not enough on any one thing,
to avoid putting my foot in my mouth without realizing.

X

Your Bad, So Sad. My Bad, And Glad

If you insult me, let me be quite perfectly clear,
you’d better be right in your basis, my dear,
because logic, facts, and reason, you’ll hear,
the weapons my response will burn in your ear.

Excuse me if I’m less than politically correct,
but especially if trying to point out your defect,
you have no legal right to avoid being upset
by my Free Speech, you fucking dumb idiot.

 

I’m not going to post anything useful, today. I hope this heads up proves useful. Doh!~

I get rejected a lot by the ladies. I asked one gal if she would like to go out on a double date, and she said “Sure. How about Judgement Day, and the Day after.”~

Hurry, hurry, hurry! Step right up folks, and get your fresh posts, right here, right now. Only $1, five for $3, and a surprise in every one, guaranteed, or your money back. Don’t be misled by the competitor’s claims; they only post kitties and slogans, and complaints that no one comments. Hurry, hurry, hurry!~

 

My Prayer today, is for you. There is nothing better than other people praying for you, especially if praying WITH you. We’re not getting older, just getting closer to home! Be Still, and at peace. Now, it is true that the Lord’s Prayer is quite sufficient and complete to God, but sometimes, we feel we want to say more. That is good with God.

May I suggest the prayer below? If ye pray it as you read, it is the same as if we have done so together; Matthew 18:19 “And I tell you more: whenever two of you on earth agree about anything you pray for, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven.” All that is required is that the prayer be righteous and fitting to God’s Will, which is defined to the extent we are able to determine in his Word. If we do not vary from that, we are apt to receive that which we NEED, if not that which we THINK we need and seek by prayer (be careful what and how you ask for [it].) Begin:

Heavenly Father, thank You for each and every day; today is a Day the Lord hath made, we rejoice and are glad in it, for You have blessed us here on earth yet again. Thank You for Your tender mercies of your Grace, and the gift of life and of Free Will, which lead us through the day; may we not abuse these gifts and offend You. Thank You for giving us family and friends to share the joys and burdens of the day. I ask You to bless my family, relatives and friends and those I care deeply for, and those who are reading this right now, especially those who are suffering and in need of your intervention.

Where there is joy, give them continued joy. Where there is pain, give them peace and mercy. Where there is self-doubt or confusion, release a renewed confidence and understanding. Where there is need, fulfill their needs. Move them to study your Word, to strengthen their faith and embrace the Gospel, and to be moved thereby to spread the Word. Bless their families, homes, finances, their goings and their comings, and turn aside their enemies in forgiveness, which is to our good as well as our enemy’s good.

Above all else, may Your Will be done, in Jesus’ name,~

 

If Istanbul used to be Contstantinople, does that mean they got tired of constantly being in Ople, wherever that is?~

Just because I disagree with you does not mean I don’t like you. I hate everyone equally.~

A conspiracy unfolding is like a barrage of arrows in the dark. You hear evidence that something is not right, but don’t don’t get the point until it is too late. Worse, you also get the shaft.~

 

Desperate Conclusion

My mind, not very clear right now, so
writing some clever rhyming ditty? No.
But I know some of you like that stuff…
So there’s only one question:
Is this good enough?

 

Good example of a self-fulfilling prophesy: “I’m going to enter the hot dog eating contest.”~

It must be true that you are what you eat. I live on $3 a day in food, and one look at me and you will know, I’m a cheapskate.~

Why do they call it an aptitude test? Because if you have to take one, you are apt to detest it.~

You will note I don’t call people who don’t agree with me bad names. That’s because the bastards have thick skins.~

 

Digital Death

My computer is dying now of old age,
and while buying a new one is truly sage,
and newer models are quite all the rage,
there’s nothing but zeros on the last page
of my checkbook; no income at my age.
My mouse is destined for the round cage,
unless comes a miracle or magical Mage.

X

Enchanting

A chant can be a kind of moving song,
easily remembered for singing along.

A chant can be a loud and angry jeer,
prompting attention, worry, and fear.

A chant might be for someone; a call,
for entertainers or leaders loved by all.

A chant gives power to thought and word,
assuring its message is clearly heard.

But a chant by Monks is the best to hear,
binding us to God and drawing Him near.

 

If I have a Colon for which I might need a Colonoscopy, and use :s and ;s in a similar manner all the time when I write, why can’t I get a Semicolonoscopy, and save some money?~

Lately, I’ve been thinking of taking a plane somewhere to improve my sex life. It won’t matter where, I just going through TSA will do the trick.~

OK, time for me to say something funny. But that would be deja vu.~

The next time you hear some wimpy Liberal whining about some perceived micro aggression, say to them, “To quote an oft used line in The Princess Bride, my little precious Princess… ‘I do not think you know what these words mean.” Then slug them in the mouth and say, “You cannot ‘micro’ that; there would be no point.”~

Since I’m left handed, I never need a Compass; I just use my southpaw.~

 

Since there is no longer rule of law in this country in high places, such that no one in government is held accountable, and the very laws they write are themselves violations of law (unconstitutional), and government itself is the biggest criminal… I reserve the right to violate ANY law at ANY time for ANY reason.

My authority is the Constitution, my basis the Pursuit of Happiness declared therein, my means is Civil Disobedience, my support is the Second Amendment, my argument the First Amendment, and my goal is the Redress guaranteed therein. I rest my case, and those who choose to oppose me may rest in peace, if that be their choice. No appointment needed.~

X

An election process is like a stale fast-food hamburger. On the outside it looks big and besprinkled with seeds of wisdom. On the inside are secret conspiratorial sauces and lies about quality and quantity of substance, and wilted vegetable-like promises. Do you want fries with that? Cold, greasy, and slimy press coverage.~

Never wander around in the dark. That would be you watching TV ‘news.’~

When people talk about shooting at dummy targets, are they hinting at politicians?
Is that why you never see politicians at a gun shop or shooting range?~

I encourage free speech. And, I own the concession on ear plugs in the District of Columbia.~

Cat got your tongue? I don’t know how you can stand there so silently, I know I’d be screaming; that’s got to hurt like hell.~

 

PC Friends?

Politically Correct is not for me, my friend,
the 1st Amendment says I’m free to offend.
My words, ideas and actions do not pretend,
that you’ve no right against them to defend;
just do so to my face with honor and it will end
with agreement or no, but still friend to friend.

X

Waiver Not

Never Opt for signing a waiver,
never waiver in copping a sign;
raising up high a middle finger,
rather than your rights to resign.

X

Prosthetic Prose

Prose is prone to rhyme in a rhythm so quaint,
but to intone it sublime; a sure given it aint’

 

Alien observer’s notebook: Man is a lousy Plumber. He must think the Ocean is impure because he keeps trying to filter out the fish with giant mesh filters. Silly creature. When that doesn’t work, he drills holes in the Ocean floor to drain the water out.~

Someone said I might should listen to Meatloaf on CD. I don’t get it. As soon as I put a slice on the CD, it stopped sizzling and I couldn’t hear a thing.~

Does the FCC really know what they are doing? I find myself waking up to AM Radio, so I know what they mean when they say ‘Morning Radio.’ But while I can find an FM station, I can never seem to find a PM station. They need someone from the NyQuil folks to run the outfit, I think.~

The answer to the age old riddle: what came first, the Chicken, or the Egg? Answer: neither; it was the Rooster. (surely, someone else said this somewhere, sometime earlier)~

I must be a looser. There was this gal I liked who always bought fresh produce. But when I got fresh, she just slapped my face.~

 

Big Enough

To big to fail cost you and me,
for bailouts, and lost property.
To big to nail, cost prohibitively
the national debt ridiculous, be.

To big to jail cost you and me,
for hall passes for Mz Hillary.
To small to hail, just you and me,
our vote has no voice collectively.

X

It’s It

Time to offer up a bit of wit.
Something funny to any Brit?
Are you worried just a we bit
about a future Brexit bad sit?
Afraid there’s no way out of it;
to escape a daily diet of shit,
Mushrooms often get slit and bit.

X

Falling Sky

Chicken Little a warning did brae,
none believed in what he did say.
Many long years since passed away,
we still refuse to believe him today.

Yet Planet X and Wormwood obey
God’s Will and ARE heading our way.
The moral to me seems thus to say:
good Chicken Littles should now pray;
for it is written, “None knows the Day,”

 

I never did well in Science Class. I still don’t know the conversion factors between celsius, farenheit, and college degrees.~

Hillary avoids Potatos and Corn. She knows they have eyes and ears and might testify.~

Gmail just informed me my folder :”Hate Mail” is full. Half of it is from Democrats, and half from Republicans. The difference is, the Republicans tell me exactly why they don’t like me, and the Democrats only tell me how they feel.~

Taxes are a fiction, just as are the wages taxed; when the dollar is nothing but an I.O.U., you never really get paid, and so, you can never really be taxed or pay taxes, either. Credit and Bank Loans are a also a fiction, just as are the checks (also I.O.U.s) used in obtaining the loan or repaying it ­– and the bank didn’t even have the money to loan in the first place (allowed to loan up to 20 times their bank deposits). We just keep spoofing each other to solidify the illusion.~

If you still hate someone after putting yourself into their shoes… then they are obviously too tight because you are too big in your own mind for your own good, fat head.~

Be thankful I’m retired. If I was doing this full-time, I’d bore you to tears.~

Now days, the only way to achieve inner peace, is to scream at the top of your lungs for the politicians and newsmen to fucking go to hell, until they actually do.~

Dear government, and megacorps: Winning is not taking rights away with legislation or getting the contract for weapons to be used at Armageddon. These things are mutually assured destruction.~

When people say not to worry about things, “They will get better,” I think they must mean that the things that worry you will get better at doing that.~

Never take the last train from Clarksville. Its full of Monkeys.~

 

Theorist’s Conspiracy

Open the door to news of tragedy obscene. The lunacy involved, what can it mean?
Turn on the light and survey the crime scene – see Rats scurry trying not to be seen.
Catch one, make it come squeaky clean: Federal ties found amid many lies between.
Note all such oddities you might glean, contrary to the official story quite glassine.
Compare to what others have seen, conclude just what it really all does mean.
Forget now all you once had been, you’re now a conspiracy theorist, a sin.

 

In case you are wondering, yes, I used to do stage comedy in talent contests. Often got a first place. That was great; being the first person put on the bus out of town, I got to choose the best seat.~

Let me apologize in advance for insulting you. I’m not going to stick around in case you start swinging.~

The Federal Gov has gotten to be such a big asshole that it doesn’t even have to fart to stink up the whole country, but it does so continuously, anyway. If Hillary is elected, she plans on feeding it beens and drinking water from Mexico, giving new meaning to when the SHTF. I’m thinking Trump is the BEANO.~

 

A Noun is a word that has a ROCK solid object identity.
A Proper Noun tells the actual name or title, my dear SIR, or may I call you JOHN.
A Pronoun is an Avatar stand in for IT.
An Adjective tells you a IDENTIFIABLE personality.
A Verb is a word in MOTION.
An Adverb tells you its VERY measure.
A Preposition pre positions the Noun TO Verb relation.
A Conjunction forms a junction function between word thoughts, SO don’t get confused.
A Contraction is a contracted attraction giving traction to two words as one, a marriage licensed by apostrophication, or a foreshortening of a word as a slang thang for those who were THINK’N they HADN’T the time or space for two words.~

X

I had a Checklist but can’t use it as I haven’t written a check since Debit Cards came out.
I had a folding Map but I can’t follow it because there is no place in my car’s dash to plug it in.
I had a Plan but I can’t follow it because the steps don’t appear on the Dance Dance Revolution pad.
I had a contract but I don’t abide by it because I already held both the first and second Parties. Sorry I didn’t invite you.
I had a Letter but Sesame Street is now on a channel I don’t get.
I had an envelope but didn’t give a lick.
I had a Folder but since I no longer need the checklist, plan, contract, letter, or envelope, I threw it away, too.~

X

A Conservative Politician in Office is conservative in measuring out his power to avoid angering the voter; he fears the people, where a Liberal believes that governmental power is end all-do all, and they use/abuse their power to manipulate the people by fear of government.

A Conservative Government heeds its own laws by conservative judgment, where a Liberal tends to apply grains of salt, rationalize, and bend slightly, each time taking more liberal advantage until it is in time fully lawless.

A Conservative Government writes Laws which are conservative in principles within the limitations of its Charter (The Constitution, Bill of Rights), where a Liberal (by the above means) takes liberties in lawmaking which take liberty out of the Law; they become increasingly unconstitutional and negate the Bill of Rights.

A Conservative Policy must always fit the national interest in obedience to Sovereignty and which honors the Charter, where a Liberal is interested in reformation to a new model, almost always globalist in nature (i.e., favoring United Nations, One-World Government) and is willing to sacrifice the Charter and Sovereignty for that agenda.

A Conservative Politician thinks in terms of limitations per the above, which allows personal and corporate governance to be at ‘”Liberty” to flourish and pursue happiness and wellbeing, trusting the people to seek what they will for their own good, where a Liberal thinks in terms of socialistic Agenda which stifle or suppress these things ‘for the good of the people, of whom they think cannot be trusted.’

A conservative understands that to become elected or to move legislation, there must be an accommodating compromise between the ideal and the attainable, where a Liberal will promise anything to get what they really want, or take any drastic measure to get what they want, even if it means legislation which cannot possibly achieve the stated purpose, and especially if it serves some unstated agenda per the above.~

 

Panic is in abundance, as is a loose tongue, when the SHTF. Calm reason and restraint is called for. Take a deep breath, grab a cold beer and reflect before commenting. But if the bullets are flying around you, SHOOT BACK AND SAVE THE DIALOG FOR LATER. That’s when you will really need that beer.~

 

Why do they call them a POEM when no other word quite right rhymes with poem?
Why do they call them a JOKE when the point is a hard straight poke?
Why do they call them a SONG when it’s really a sing?
Why do they call them a RIDDLE when the answer is a clue in the middle?
Why do they call them a SPEECH when it gives you the claps or makes you boo who?
Why do they call them a REport, REmark or REply when it’s actually the first time?
Why do they call them a QUESTion when instead of taking the path to the answer on your own,
you leave it to another to do?
Why do they call them a PARagraph when there’s really only one?
Why do they call them a SENTENCE
when they rarely involve a judge?
Why do they call them a STORY when they don’t have walls, cielings, or floors?
Why do they call this a POST… oh, wait, I know: because that’s what it’s as dumb as.~

X

Why is it that you can talk to ten strangers and 7 or more of them will believe or agree like minded if you tell them…

About a UFO you’ve seen…
About 911 as an inside job…
About Global Warming as a sham…
About CIA and the mob killing JFK…
About chemtrails vs. contrails…
About a Bilderberger NWO/Illuminati conspirators…
About mind control, gang stalking, Voice-2-Skull…

But when you talk to ten lawmakers, law keepers, medicals, or reporters about any of that…
You are suddenly crazy to the point of risking forced evaluation?

Because the System and its professional armies are taught not to believe in the boogyman (who arranged for their lessons).~

 

The addage “Follow your dreams…” with respect to career can end terribly, UNLESS you take the RIGHT path:

1 toe in the water as a hobby… Insures you really do like it and have basic skills required.
2 build a boat taking courses in the trade, even if mail order or online. This will confirm
if you have actual talent. If not, start over w next best passion.
3 float the boat as intern. This will educate you as to the harsh realities and negatives of the
trade. Lets you confirm you like it, and regardless, gives a leg up on others for getting the job.
4 if you get this far, set sail as employee, setting aside savings. You WILL do well if you are ‘all in,’
what some call the ‘work ethic,’ which is simply doing your best.
5 with savings, buy a yacht by starting your own firm. That will plot a course to your dreams.

More: at all levels, start a small home-based business for both the experience, income, and tax benefits. This allows you to build resources (eg, instruments for a musician) less expensively and helps build your resume, client base, networking resources. I have NEVER not operated my own business since entering high school, and most related in their start to my first entry into a given field of work, at the hobby stage. I have therefore mastered and become successful in many fields and industry sectors, and despite having only a high school education, I’ve been granted four experiential degrees for the purpose of teaching at college level.~

 

My Mom always told me not to play in the street. She was right. The freeways are much more fun – if you are agile and don’t mind the blaring horns and screeching tires…~

What did the politician say to the activist? Nothing. He doesn’t pay attention to those voters, either.~

You are free to disagree with me as long as you understand I am never wrong and never make a mitsak ni anteing I sae.~

 

Modern Debate

What I believe is true. If you disagree, screw you.
I know I’ m right, I do. I’m clearly smarter than you.
Don’t you dare try to argue – untill your face turns blue:
What I believe is due – to claims I find undeniably true.

Your facts will not do, they confuse what I know is true.
Such reality I pooh pooh, my mind made up for me, you
see; I won’t listen to you. What’s that you ask askew?

No, I no not just who said, but some kind of Web guru.
Its not important just who. But I know it surly wasn’t you.
What I believe is true. If you don’t agree, boo hoo to you.
Truth’s what I want it to be, no matter what you say or do.

 

A Democrat Congressman and a Republican Senator walked into a bar… Wait! That’s already as big a joke as can be…~

Notice: please note… In case you haven’t noticed before. Have you ever noticed there is hardly ever been and important notice delivered or posted such that you actually noticed? Nah, I bet you didn’t even notice any such post. I hereby give notice that, if you noticed this post, or not, this notice is not such a notice, but merely a post giving note to such.~

 

Dos You Got Down Wid Wad I Be Say’n Bout Dis and Dat, Bro?

Dis, Dat, and Dos, as ‘hip’ as they could be, went into a bar to get a drink. Dos bought the 1st round of beers. Once served, Dat said “Dis be good ‘n stuff.”

Dis replied “I try to be good like dat, you know? Mama sez to.”

Dat saw Dis was confused, “Thank yo for the compliment, Dis, but dat not wad I meant. We all be drink’n da same brew and dat be good’n stuff.”

Dis and Dat seemed confused. “Look, Man, dis is on tapn we don’t be know’n wad it be,” he clarified.

Dis choked on a swig. “What yo say, bro? No one be tap’n on me, so natch, I dont know wad it be.”

“No, Man,” Dat tried to explain further, “Dis beer be tap beer. It be good, but ah dont know wad it be.”

Dis, at least, finally understood. “I got yo drift, now, Man. But I heard dos tap beers were cheap’n stuff. You know, po shit wid no taste. So wad dis be?”

Now Dos complained. “Wad yo mean… yo be sayin I bought cheep beers?”

And now, Dis was confused, once more, too. “I be just fine, bro. Why yo ask wad I be?”

At this point, the bartender happened by. “Hey, Man,” accosted Dat. “We be wond’rn… Wad be dis here beer?”

Dat be Dos,” he replied simply. “Dat be good, n stuff.”

Dat seemed upset, now. “Look, man, we been all through Dis be’n good, n stuff. But if yo be say,n I sho nuff should be like Dos… dat Dos be gooder,n me, I take ‘ception to dat. Yo don’t know Dat, and yo sho as Hell dont know me.”

Now Dos was miffed. “Hang on a sec, man,” he said to Dat, “yo sayin yo better’n me?”

Well, things went down hill from there and it looked like a fight was about to break out, when the bartender tried to calm them with clarification. “Dis be rediculous!” he started.

But Dis did’t give him a chance to finish, and knocked him on his ass!
 “Ha!” he exclaimed. “Yo dumb ass be’n on da flo wid yo dumb fat mouth bleed’n wad be rediculous.”

This unexpected event had disrupted the conflict between Dos and Dat long enough that they had calmed down. Dis suggested they leave, and all agreeing, they stormed out in a huff.

As they exited, Dis noted “We stiil dont know wad dat beer be. I sho nuff wish I knew.” 
The others agreed, none of them noticing the neon sign in the window reading “Dos XX on tap.”~

X

If Trump is such a chump we’ rather dump, and Uncle Bernie is ample wormy and too squirmy, and Hillary far too shrillery under FBI drillery, then does that mean Biden is bid’n his tim’n in decid’n if rid’n White Knight style last minute to the Demo’s how we’ll be decid’n who’s presidential presid’n?~

What happens when a Socialist politician, an establishment Democrat, a non establishment Republican and an establishment Republican go into a Bar and call for a round on them, each? The price of drinks goes up, the waitresses worry about deportation, the bartender adds water to the drinks, the bouncer calls a reporter, and the Janitor worries about having to clean up all the bullshit that’s about to be spread. And, the patrons realize the hangover isn’t going to be worth it, and they leave.~

 

 

Ferrari facing cataclysm!

 

Fractured Isms.

 

Ferris Beuller (Matthew Broderick) had it right. “A person should not believe in an “ism“, he should believe in himself.” In other words, don’t be a follower of someones ideas. If you want to make a change for the better, YOU are what you’ve been waiting for.

Here are some (twisted) examples of perhaps why isms can be problematic…

Capitalism: You have two cows. Sell one and buy a bull to start a cow factory. Worship in any church you want as long as you tithe a portion of your stock options. John Lennon is a famous millionaire singer invited to sit on your Board of Directors. Apple Computer stock looks attractive, so you merge to form Cowpile Computer.

Socialism: You have two cows. Give one cow to the government to slaughter and share with the poor. You worship in any church which is left or right of center. John Lennon is a folk singer of meaningful Marxist ballads. Apple Computer is bailed out by Congress whenever its stock falls below that of Microsoft.

Communism: You had two cows, but now the State has them, and may or may not give you some milk – if you are willing to stand in a long line. You do not go to church except to attend Party meetings. John Lennon is a decadent influence on youth. Apple Computer never was, because they refused to allow government to take more than one bite of it as it would ruin the logo.

Fascism: You had two cows but the government forced you to sell them to corporations for beans (magic or otherwise) who in turn sells the dairy and beef products back to you for huge profits. You go to the same church as the fearless leader, or you don’t go at all. John Lennon sounds like he was related to a Marxist and so he was shot. Apple Computer was burned to the ground in order to blame Compaqism and sweep Bill Gates into power.

Nazism: You had two cows but the government arrested you for hording and took them. You and your religious fanatic family are burned alive in your church for refusing to Sig Heil. John Lennon was in there with you, singing Give Peace a Chance. Apple Computer users are arrested and sent to camps for daring to ‘Think Different.’

Anarchism: You have two cows running down the freeway causing car wrecks. Shoot the tax collector, steal his money, and rape his dog (unless a hunting dog – but since it is a government dog, we know that dog don’t hunt.) You blow up the church. John Lennon sings Revolution. Macintosh Computers have a high repair rate from all the bullet holes.

Constitutionalism: You have two cows and the government cannot unreasonably search or seize them without a warrant, or prevent them from mooing, or prevent you from owning them and forming a militia of fellow cow owners who meet weekends and practice milking with dummy targets. You can’t figure out which of the thousands of churches to attend. Neither can John Lennon, so he writes Imagine. Steve Jobs was a Founding Father who wrote the ‘Consitution for the rest of us.’

Patriotism: You have two cows painted red, white, and blue. Your church supports the current war. John Lennon is boycotted, and so he has a sleep in. Apple is not sold to anyone unwilling to pledge allegiance to Microsoft products.

Militarism: You have two cows which you have convinced each that the other is seeking to invade their own private pasture. You sell arms to both sides. Your church owns stock in your company. John Lennon had his visa revoked because he was a pacifist who smoked pot. Apple Computer is what makes smart bombs smart.

Pacifism: You have two contented cows which give canned milk. Your body is your temple (and you are what you eat.) The government is headed by John Lennon. Apple Computer listens to its customer complaints.

Fatalism: Your cows died after you stopped feeding them because you figured they would just die, anyway. It was the same reasoning by which you determined God is dead. You never heard of John Lennon. Apple System error messages all start with ‘You should have known better than to think this wasn’t going to happen…’

Surrealism: You have a pasture full of Dell Computers searching the Web for the best price on a Macintosh. The government worships you. There is no John Lennon, because he would have made sense, so he instead turns out to actually be Ringo Star, who never quite did.

Bushisms: Is your cows in my Big Mac? I’m a God fearing man on Sundays. Which one is Lennon, and which one is Lennin? I will not have one of those damned Macs on my desk. Jobs didn’t contribute one cent to my election fund!

Clintonisms: Wow, look at those udders! I’m a God fearing man on Sundays. I liked John Lennon. We had a lot in common. In fact, I inhaled once, myself. I don’t know about granting Apple a GSA contract… they didn’t contribute to my election fund.

Obamaisms: Your cows are being detained indefinitely to combat terrorism. I’m a God fearing man on Sundays, unless I’m playing Golf. I liked John Lennon. I had FBI sue Apple Computer, who wouldn’t let me spy on iPhones, and didn’t contribute to my election fund.

Note: If you like the isms, they were lifted from a page full of additional jokes of greater complexity than the bulk of material in this post. Find them here: To Laugh in the Face of the NWO is the Best Form of Contempt.

 

What Will You U$E For Currency When T$HTF?


The more we move toward a cashless society, the more we are at risk should some financial, political, or natural disaster transpire which weakens or destroys societal and governmental dynamics. What people will accept in payment or trade for scarce and critical supplies could threaten your life if you don’t have any, or the cost may be more than you can afford, if you do. Here are some ideas to help you be prepared.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com    proparanoid.net    facebook

copyright © 2016, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Please comment any such repost to original posting.

In this post you will learn…

• what makes money valuable is also what can make it worthless;

• plastic and precious metals are useless in the aftermath of crisis;

• why government frowns and suppresses barter, and why to embrace it anyway;

• cash is usually aftermath King… but not always;

• whole new currencies evolve in serious or long term aftermath.

What money is, and why it has value

Money is nothing more than a convenient way to conduct ‘commerce’ (trade goods and services) with a standard and portable stand-in for something else of value. For this to work, all people within the trading area must agree to use it as such, and ‘it’ must have a definable and concretely known value. Any system of money is best handled by the local government, be it a tribal village in ancient times, or a modern industrialized nation. Or, it can be done by a network of banking and financial institutions, or even a combination with government. As we will see, banking options are good for them, bad for everyone else.

The later is what we have, today, and it suffers two problems most of us are aware of, both stemming from the banking side. To fully appreciate that, we should step back in time just a bit. Please take the time to read what you may otherwise presume already to know, because the points made in this section will play to remaining sections in critical ways. This is because only governments used to issue money, and to establish its value, they could not and dare not create money unless they held something of value in reserves somewhere, something of concrete and great value to back it up. Most nations, as did America, used Gold; the ‘Gold Standard.’

tshtf

Whatever the value standard was, a citizen could go to a bank or government Purser, and demand to trade in the currency for its value in that item (i.e., Gold), or vice versa. This system guaranteed the value of the currency to a known unit of measure, and tended to help establish and maintain a stable economy, and made international trade viable; each currency had a concretely known valuation, and established trust between nations that the standard item, itself, could be obtained, if desired, to settle any balance of trade debt which might exist.

Then came the banks with their own idea, called Central Banks, which enables the printing of Fiat Currency, which is money which has nothing of value backing it. Enter the Federal Reserve Banking System. It has cost you and me a significant sum of our personal lifetime earrings. Some say we have literally been sold into slavery to the banks. Learn more about exactly how much it has cost you personally, here. Many, as do I, call it Treason, including the prophetic warnings of our Founding Fathers:

• “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks…will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered…. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” – Thomas Jefferson in the debate over the Re-charter of the Bank Bill of 1809 (millions of us, including myself, did wake up homeless with the Mortgage Derivative Collapse and associated ‘too big to fail’ bailouts, and we have had nothing but inflation and deflation cycles, not to mention devaluation of the dollar since establishing the Fed)

• “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.” –Thomas Jefferson

• “… The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burdens ever accumulating.” -Thomas Jefferson (a reference to the National Debt)

• “History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” -James Madison

• “If congress has the right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations.” -Andrew Jackson (Banks are corporations)

• “The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.” -Abraham Lincoln (the Fed is all about interest paid to the banks for every dollar printed.)

• “Issue of currency should be lodged with the government and be protected from domination by Wall Street. We are opposed to…provisions [which] would place our currency and credit system in private hands.” – Theodore Roosevelt (in the long-running debate about establishing a central bak.)

But the Fed would become reality just in time to pay for WWI with fiat money. But that was not the first time. In the early days of forming new States within the United States, Banks could also print their own money with no attachment to or obligation of government, hopefully backing it up with some kind of standard; a certain degree of trust was involved, and many people found that their banker was a crook. This practice, both legitimate and criminal, was especially common in Gold and Silver mining towns, where shipping precious metals was risky due to bandits. Other negotiable instruments also came to exist, which can similarly be thought of as forms of money. Stocks, Bonds, Notes, Futures, and more. But these featured valuations tied to more complex and less tangible things, and were not simple enough for usage as currency except with brokers and special institutional trading firms.

But several new ways for banks to print their own money also arose which were useful enough by all. One is the ‘Check,’ your checking account. It is merely a highly organized and easily validated (to a point) method of trading in I.O.U.s. Anyone can write an I.O.U. on a any piece of paper, and if the other person accepts it as a debt, and the writer honors it, it has value. And, it can be passed from one person to another until paid, like a Marker used in the underworld.

But people do not trust strangers, and the bank’s checking systems addressed that by using the bank as a kind of validation and tracking of the debt, and the debtor. The underworld uses fear and organized crime to do the same with markers. And, do we not fear the wrath of our banks and the law should we write a bad check? This is called debt bondage, a very real and powerful political and social control system that keeps the locals, that’s you and me, in line for fear of loosing all they own. Unless, of course, you simply choose to  opt out, as have I.

As far as checking is concerned, eventually, the check must be traded for real currency, so no new money was actually created, but while in circulation, the total amount of ‘money in use’ is greater than had been printed, a pseudo inflation factor. Today, some 20 billion checks are written each year, with a value of 26 trillion. To put that into perspective, it would pay off the entire National Debt with money to spare. It is also roughly 20 times the value of all U.S. money in circulation. So is the National Debt, and though no causal connection seems to exist, it is an interesting coincidence, is it not?

Banks also ‘print’ money by loaning money that does not exist. They are allowed by law to loan up to 20 times the money they hold in their vaults from depositors. They write a check, and you then use that ‘money’ to write more checks for whatever purpose the loan was intended. They get deposited somewhere, and eventually returned to the issuing bank. You make monthly payments to the bank, money against which more loans can be made. As long as less than 1 in 20 of loaned dollars is converted to cash withdrawal, the bank has gotten away with printing at least 19 defacto dollars; another pseudo inflation factor. A loan is for fictitious money, and how to you repay a fiction? A question well asked, and some have an answer which will astonish you, and though giving you hope, you will fear it, as well.

The worst offender is the Central Banking System, which allows governments to print money with absolutely nothing behind it; no standard. The government itself is printing nothing more than an I.O.U. The Bank, in our case being the Federal Reserve Bank (the Fed), which is NOT a Federal Agency, but a banker-controlled corporation. The Treasury prints money in the form of Federal Reserve Notes backed only by interest bearing Treasury Bonds given to the Federal Reserve (functionally, an I.O.U.), and the Federal Reserve Note is itself therefore also an I.O.U. Some of these are sold to anyone wishing to buy them, quite often hundreds of millions of dollars held by wealthy men of note, but also, ordinary citizens. Those unsold are held by the banking cadre.

This is an automatic inflation driving machine for several reasons, not the least of which is it allows government to fund any massive and costly adventure without worrying about actually paying for it, as long as they are willing to drive up the National Debt, which no one is ever going to pay off. The downside is, of course, that our purchasing power continues to dwindle, and at some point, the dollar will need to be officially devalued, and only YOU and I will loose in that deal. Meanwhile, every increase of the national debt is de facto devaluation; you and I loose purchasing power as if officially devalued. Simultaneously, more and more of tax dollars go to the FED to pay off INTEREST (only) on T Bills, and that money goes directly to the bankers. The debt is NEVER reduced.

If it were, the Fed would actually collapse. Here is an explanation from David Graeber, and English Anthropologist, regarding the first central bank in existence: “In fact this [debt] is precisely the logic on which the Bank of England—the first successful modern central bank—was originally founded. In 1694, a consortium of English bankers made a loan of £1,200,000 to the king. In return they received a royal monopoly on the issuance of banknotes [their ‘Fed’]. What this meant in practice was they had the right to advance IOUs for a portion of the money the king now owed them to any inhabitant of the kingdom willing to borrow from them, or willing to deposit their own money in the bank—in effect, to circulate or “monetize” [create fiat currency] the newly created royal debt. This was a great deal for the bankers: they got to charge the king 8 percent annual interest for the original loan and simultaneously charge interest on the same money to the clients who borrowed it, but it only worked as long as the original loan remained outstanding. To this day, this loan has never been paid back. It cannot be. If it ever were, the entire monetary system of Great Britain would cease to exist.

There is much more which can be and should be said, but this is not about the evils of the Federal Reserve or financial institutions. The intent was simply to give a glimpse at what money is, and what makes it valuable (or not), in NORMAL circumstances. And, in normal circumstances, the ONLY thing which makes Federal Reserve Notes valuable is a law passed in support of creation of the Fed, which says and which is echoed right on the money, itself, that it is good for all debts, public and private; should you refuse to accept it as such, the debt is forgiven under that law; we are forced to accept it.

 

But what happens when TSHTF?

In any serious financial, societal, or natural disaster, all bets may be off, and cash may either become a monstrous burden, or have no value at all. To the extent that social systems and governmental control fails, or their function is diluted, the value of money can suddenly become undefined, except by the seller. It is not just a matter of free-market price setting, but weather or not the seller will see value in money, at all, the government no longer being in a position to enforce the law which says it must be accepted.

Pre War Germany was in financial crises which ultimately helped to sweep Hitler into power. Here, a woman purchases some food with a basket full of money. Germany's inflation rate was so high that they were printing 100 billion Deutchmark bills (i.e., a single $100,000,000,000 bill) for public use.

Pre War Germany was in severe financial crises which ultimately helped to sweep Hitler into power. Of course, he blamed the Jews, who had nothing to do with it, but scapegoats are easy to come by when people are scared. Here, a woman purchases some food with a basket full of money. Germany’s inflation rate was so high that they were printing 100 billion Deutchmark bills (i.e., a single DM100,000,000,000 bill) for public use. MONEY WAS ESSENTIALLY WORTHLESS. Welcome to fiat currency run amok.

Some say to hoard precious metals for such crisis, but that is foolishness, because you can’t spend gold. For one thing, it is too valuable, and another, it is too difficult to validate without special chemicals, scales, and knowledge. How does the seller know it is real Gold, or what its actual value currently is? Not only will there be an issue as to weight, which is multiplied by a given value per ounce, but there will be no way to know (where a crises involves loss of communications), what the actual current value per ounce actually is. The wise seller must therefore significantly undervalue any metal offered in payment.

And how do you buy something low in value with something high in value, when there is no way to ‘make change?’ Hoarding Gold is fine for long-term protection of large cash holdings, but it is next to useless and extremely costly to attempt to use it as currency in a crisis.

THEREFORE, if actual money starts to fail in usefulness, whole new currencies will arise.

 

What will be the new currency in a crisis?

Yes, new currencies, and nothing like money as we know it. But like money, where it is still accepted in a crisis, the value thereof will be determined mostly by the seller, and this will give new meaning to the expression, ‘shop around.’ The most common alternate currencies will become food, water, fuels, and ammunition. Too a lesser degree, anything in high demand and low supply, such as weapons and tools, or anything key to survival. Being aware of that in advance is a great advantage, because there are two things in common with all these items which allows for good preparation.

The first is, that they have a relatively low value now, before there is a crisis. You can afford to stockpile, and would be wise to do so, taking into consideration storage space requirements and shelf life. It would be good to have at least a small hoard of each item in quantities greater than for reserves for personal consumption during the emergency and, where storage space, shelf life, and finances permit, to perhaps have a large hoard of one or more items on the list to become your personally favored currency.

The second is, that anyone can produce them, themselves, to one degree or another, both before and after a crisis. Anyone can sink a well or fetch water from nature, and transport it to where it is less available for ‘profit.’ Anyone can grow and store food if they have the land for it. Anyone can chop wood or make alcohol (fuels) if they but arrange to do so. Anyone can reload spent munitions if they have a loader and can obtain gunpowder, and for the matter, anyone can make gunpowder if they know how to find the raw materials and they are locally available.

Lead for ammunition is another matter, but it is cheap to buy ahead of crisis. So the purchase of a supply of lead and tools to form bullets and reload might be a great idea. Yet most people will not do any of these things, or cannot due to finances or lack of knowledge, and it is exactly that which gives them an excellent future value – extra value, in fact, because in aftermath situations, the normal supply chain of these things has been interrupted or entirely cut off, and access to the knowledge or finances to acquire them with it.

Once TSHTF, you are locked into your current state of affairs; you are either prepared to offer the right currency at an affordable rate, or you are slave and at the mercy to/of those who can. Only one of these two groups has a good chance at survival. That is the worst kind of debt slavery.

 

Barter, the alternative currency

Click to get a glimpse at doing your own barter from a legal perspective.

Click to get a glimpse at doing your own barter network from a legal perspective.

The government hates barter and suppresses it in a mountain of laws restricting its use. Barter is, in fact, the basis of the new evolving currencies just discussed. But for those in that second, hapless group just mentioned, they may be able to survive for a while by bartering with their earthly possessions, albeit at a costly rate of exchange. A $3,000 professional video camera might be good for a tank of gas, or a few days worth of food; what value is there in a video camera without electricity? But it might be accepted if there is some hope that, eventually, power will be restored, or if the parts might be useful to a tinkerer seeking to build something mechanically useful.

But barter can work well, even before a crisis, despite the laws. The laws are there because the barter concept tends to ‘cheat’ government out of taxes. If you buy something with dollars, you got taxed on the income from whence you got the dollars, and the seller is taxed on the income he earned, and there is likely a sales tax, as well. In barter, as originally conceived and employed before the laws existed, you simply gave labor in exchange for items, or traded items. As long as both parties agreed the exchange was acceptable value given for acceptable value received, it was a done deal. Yes, sometimes one side might feel the value was short, and ask for augmentation with a little cash thrown in.  Or not.

Barter best works in a network situation involving more than two parties. You have Oranges and want Apples, I have Grapes and want Oranges, and someone else has Apples and wants Grapes. No problem, a three-way swap. But to do that takes an organized network with the means to track what is needed and match it to what is offered and available elsewhere. Barter associations or organizations are set up, and of course, that takes effort and manpower, and a building that has monthly rent, and other things which take actual money.

The other thing a barter group could do, was to accept goods or labor obligations (I.O.U. for work to be done) as if a deposit in a bank, against which the member offering such could make some combination of present or future withdrawal of other goods or services as they became available and needed. This allows conversion of unwanted or surplus items into future barter trade power, rendering the barter group as a kind of retail store and universal service provider. Again, government does not like anything resembling a bank in procedure, and would normally tax a retailer on inventory.

As all these functions take money to facilitate, barter groups would charge a small fee for a transaction based on the dollar value of the transaction. DOLLARS were still used as the MEDIUM for determining TRADE VALUATIONS. That meant creating a corporate entity to facilitate and organize barter transactions, and typically, charging a membership fee to allow access to the system. That was what led government to take interest in and to legislate against barter; such systems could quickly grow in membership and began processing huge numbers of transactions, some of which were themselves huge in valuation.

I, for example, belonged to such a group, and in a single transaction, moved $35,000 in goods, against which I would acquire needed goods and services which enabled me to live more inexpensively for a full decade — until the government passed laws which forced the barter group out of business, and started taxing everyone involved to the point where the advantage seemed lost. But it need not be that way, especially once TSHTF.

You can join an existing barter program, but if you do, you should also form your own local barter group, because the big programs will not be available in a crisis. Anyone do so without formal corporate existence, and without charging fees, and without a retail or banking format. I highly encourage it, though you should check with a lawyer as laws vary State to State (click the above image for the Oregon situation). Yes, there will be some concern about tax reporting, but that is a minor issue unless you start dealing in large volumes of goods and services. Frankly, most people who barter this way report nothing, because unless it is in volume, it isn’t even worth the trouble to track and report it, not to them, or the government. But the VALUE is in HAVING A NETWORK IN PLACE IN A CRISIS…   priceless.

When TSHTF, especially if communications are down, it is both difficult and even potentially dangerous to attempt to form a network. Danger stems from the fact that, unless care is taken to avoid strangers, you may offer to form a network, in which case you state what you have of interest, and if they think they have more guns than you, and want what you have, they know where to get it without cost. Moreover, mutual defense is a thing which can itself become a barter commodity, assuming you have the guns and manpower of good use to others; it is, after all, another kind of service.

So to prepare for a crisis, don’t just hoard key supplies, but establish a barter network, even if you do not choose to use it. Doing so amplifies the value of your preferred currency, because you already have people willing to accept it fairly. Consider these words of wisdom:

• “The propensity to truck, barter and exchange one thing for another is common to all men, and to be found in no other race of animals.” Adam Smith, Scottish Philosopher.

My take is that barter is natural to man, and as such, is an unstated free right to undertake at will – to hell with government, or in reverse, if government has gone to hell, what else do we have to trade with, but barter;

• “Capitalism invariably boils down to barter between two willing parties, neither of whom uses force to work with the other.” Ben Shapiro, Political Commentator.

When TSHTF, force becomes the only commodity the weak minded and hapless will have to trade with. To strengthen your defenses, you need something better, as well as a means of countering force with force of your own. A Barter network gives you both, where mutual defense agreements become a thing which may be bartered: If I have superior weapons and more gun bearers than you, an imbalance exists which might be offset in goods or other services.

• “In primitive society, Man produced directly for the satisfaction of his own wants, but with the development of society came differentiation of functions; exchange and barter arose, various trades sprang up, and with the necessity of commercial intercourse, cam the invention of money.” Charles A. Beard, renowned Historian.

This sums up this entire post in the most direct of statements: barter came first, money after. When money fails to function usefully, we must be ready to barter, either with a new currency of convenience, or outright barter networking. Our very lives could depend upon it.

Not fully convinced? Want more information?

May I humbly suggest some further reading about WHY you should worry about flying excrement from an unexpected fan, and also offer some additional valuable resources? Here is a compendium of useful material on the dangers of crisis and the topic of being prepared, not just in terms of currency, but other considerations which are well beyond the scope of this post. These are Facebook ‘pages,’ so you can FOLLOW them for updates. Please consider to Follow my blog, as well.

The Fema, Martial Law, Revolution Database. Don’t let the title scare you away; its a compendium of articles and posts about the likelihood and risks of various forms of civil unrest and social, economic, or natural disasters, as well as general advice such as found in the above post. It’s sub-name is When All Hell Breaks Loose.

The Post Apocalyptic Library. A compendium of resources where you can find critical how-to information needed for survival in a crisis. Everything from how to make a torch to how to make a portable generator from a lawn mower. The idea is to visit those sites and print the instructions, and place them in a safe place and in your ‘go bag’ so that you will have them when needed; they won’t be available once TSHTF.

Preppers Are Not Stupid; Dissonant Non Preppers Are Doomed


Even our own government, normally blind to problems until too late, has been warning us for years to be prepared for ‘something scary,’ and the list of concerns is very scary. The stakes couldn’t be higher: if even just one thing on the list takes place, being ill prepared can perish whole families and, in short order, whole communities. Here is something that can make a difference, and its free. Its called knowledge.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   proparanoidpress.com   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2016, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Please comment any such repost to original posting.

 

In this post you will learn…

• What Preppers are and why they exist;

• Why YOU should become a Prepper, and HOW to proceed;

• There are 2 NEW and FREE resources to simplify the effort usefully

Note: I usually well footnote my posts so you can verify what I say for yourself. In this case, the two Facebook pages mentioned at article end, themselves, offer ample proofs for those items not otherwise footnoted.

 

The wise live for Today, but plan for Tomorrow: uncertainty is the only certainty

The Bible is the oldest source of Wisdom modern Man relies upon, and it clearly echoes that thought; there are no less than 25 places in the Bible which so admonish. A good number of these directly talk about the kind of preparedness this post addresses, while the remainder speak to being prepared for entry into the Kingdom of Heaven. But, if one is not prepared for things which can take one’s life, is not the later concern all the more important to prepare for, as well?

Perhaps the strongest and simplest of these are found in Proverbs (natch):

22:3The prudent sees danger and hides himself, but the simple go on and suffer for it;”

27:1Do not be confident about tomorrow, for you do not know what a day may bring.”

If we hold onto any one thing in this country, it is the wisdom of our Founding Fathers, and they were almost to a Man God Fearing and, therefore, they heeded such words. But they themselves also spoke plainly and logically about such things, and framed them in terms of the Nation, as well as the Individual and those we each love, to whom we are responsible for their well being:

John Adams, on the risk of overconfidence and reliance upon government: “I give you this warning that you may prepare your mind for your fate;”

Benjamin Franklin: “By failing to prepare, you prepare to fail;”

Alexander Hamilton: “If fortune should smile upon us, it will do us no harm to have been prepared for adversity; if she frowns upon us, by being prepared, we shall encounter it without the chagrin of disappointment. Your future rank in life is a perfect lottery;”

Thomas Jefferson: “Instead of considering what is past, however, we are to look forward and prepare for the future.”

George Washington, on wise use of funds, such that: “timely disbursements to prepare for danger frequently prevent much greater disbursements to repel it.”

Thomas Pain, on being fugitive from tyranny: “O! receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind.”

The Modern Prepper and Dr. Strangelove

Early Preppers private Bomb Shelter of the 50's: Dig a hole, drop in some roofing upon a floor, and fill it in.That last quote brings us to the advent of the modern Prepper, a phenomenon brought about by the Cold War and fear of the Bomb. President Eisenhower spoke frequently about the need for Civil Defense Preparedness, and founded what ultimately became FEMA, the ‘Grandaddy Prepper.’ For the rest of us, we were encouraged to prepare for nuclear war in our thinking, and our behavior.

We were taught to ‘Duck and Cover,’ and to plan to flee the cities, or take to bomb shelters. The whole basis of our modern Interstate Highway System was to that end, and so that the military and other aid could quickly flow to any wound in need of dressing. Cold War tensions culminated in the dire climactic confrontation of the Cuban Missile Crisis, and firmly established the era of the Bomb and Fallout Shelters. There were, in fact, enough shelters built to save 100,000,000 Americans, millions being built by citizens in their own homes or back yards: Dig a hole, drop in a pipe and add a floor, and fill it in and stock it.

 

Why prep today? Darker times > starker threats > greater fears

For a time, I managed a gas station while investigating the Oil Industry. That led me to a face-to-face confrontation with terrorism which rendered the investigation superfluous. For those who do not appreciate or understand the Prepper, or why they do what they do, or for the matter, who do not understand Conspiracy Theorists, Truthers, or Targeted Individuals claiming mind control, I highly recommend working for at least 30 days in a gas station. Why? Because that is an excellent place to talk with a large number and a variety of people in the course of doing business, and elicit from them things they would never otherwise admit in open conversation.

sheepdip2I could ask almost anything, and if well proposed, obtain a deeply personal and meaningful reply. And I did, regularly, on on a wide range of topics. What I learned is that there are more people afraid of more things than the mere threat of global extinction from The Bomb and the ‘Red Menace.’ Terrorism, yes, and for more of a seriously right reason than the obvious, a reason unexpected even by them.

It is to me even scarier than the fact that terrorism exists. Few are aware, but the top ranking U.S. Military General, Tommy Franks (who brought the flame throwing tank to Waco), has warned in a public statement that if there is another 9-11 level terror attack in the United States, the Military will take over the government in nation-wide Martial Law. I, for one, do not want flame throwing tanks on my streets.

And, we are still threatened by nuclear war: China’s top military leader has stated that war with the U.S. is inevitable, the only thing remaining being to decide when and how to be the first to strike. And, we have recently learned, they have stealth subs we cannot detect; one surfaced unexpectedly in the middle of a U.S. Carrier Fleet in the middle of an exercise looking for subs. North Korea is constantly making threats, and Obama and Hillary Clinton have assured terroism-minded Iran has access to the Bomb. We have several times in the last year, alone, come close to trading blows with Russian forces which could easily have escalate to a nuclear exchange. And we supposedly like each other, now.

Moreover, as recently played out in the Press, we have learned that a single well placed nuke high in the atmosphere could cause an EMP wave sending us back into the stone age by wiping out all electronics, including the entire power grid. Just as bad, spurious energy waves from the Sun could achieve the same ends, globally, or for the matter, doomsday rocks from space could effect similar damage, or worse. Movie theaters are awash these kinds of with (Extenction Level Event) scenariosDeep_Impact_poster. But there are other fears, and each one seems, in turn, to begat another, often wilder and seemingly more far fetched… which unfortunately, do not seem all that far fetched if daring to explore the facts which are their basis.

Every few months there seems to be another new exotic biological threat, either a weaponized or natural pathogen or virus on the verge of pandemic capability. Each such threat additionally threatens to be incurable and impossible to stop in time because it takes such a long time to come up with defensive medicines. Then there is the risk of financial collapse, which could trigger a global replay of the Great Depression on an unimaginable scale. Civil unrest levels are at the greatest and most dramatic in all of history; the Occupy/99% movement spontaneously fielded many millions of people around the World in the space of days. Our government’s liberal policies and some unfortunate events have fomented racism issues to the point that Blacks are shooting Cops as if at war, and threatening worse.

We see paranoia rampant in our government, who treats us all as if terrorists in the wings, spying on us and taking away our rights, and leading to fears of Martial Law, and/or efforts to take away our guns. DARPA, on the other hand, has ordered billions of rounds of ammo, enough to kill every living soul in North America several times over. FEMA seems to be building large facilities some fear are closer to concentration and even death camps than to shelters. It is at least concretely true that several special inciner-ators have been built, each strategically located, and capable of efficiently destroying hundreds of millions of tons of contaminated materials — which could include human bodies. The fear of Fascism and the comparison of our government to Nazi Germany is commonplace, which brings me back to the dialogs at the gas pump, where these things were said. The most common phrase heard in response to such things was, “When the revolution comes…”

Then there is the dramatic increase in UFO sightings, and much more than that, a growing body of evidence of actual combat taking place. If chemtrails were not already their own perceived threat, consider the latest theory as to their purpose; to weaponize the atmosphere against alien aggression. There is actually some scientific basis for such wild theories, and some to additionally suggest there is an off-world secret space program with Buck Rogers-like Space marines using captured Alien technology. I don’t know about any of that, but the fact that the government is becoming more secretive about the UFO question than ever, before, does not allow me to discount the notion. Presidents Roosevelt, Regan, Bush, Clinton, and Obama, and even Putin, have all alluded to these possibilities, as well as have high ranking military. The recent discovery of a constructed mega-structure orbiting a distant Sun amplifies the possibility: we are not alone. And those at the gas pump agree. More people have seen UFOs or otherwise have reason to believe in Aliens, than not. Don’t take my word for anything in this paragraph; just tune into Ground Zero and scan the archives of shows with Clyde Lewis’ expert guests.

Dare we mention a credible Planet X, super volcanos, global warming and melting ice caps, mega earthquakes, the shifting of our magnetic poles, and any number of scientifically plausible threats and natural disasters capable of inflicting significant regional, national, or global destruction of cataclysmic proportion… or dare we say… Biblical? After all, the other common comment at the gas pump is, “We are living in the End Times.” Indeed, the Illuminati conspiracies, AKA The New World Order, are not difficult to validate with a barrage of demonstrable facts which defy coincidence. This author has made a case in several of his books that the ultimate goal of the New World Order is to form a One-World Government — in order for the Antichrist to have a seat of power, and usher in the End of Ages, the ultimate End Game. It IS prophesied, after all, and many of us fear that as much as anything else.

That brings us full circle, back to the Bible’s admonishments. Being prepared ought rightly be not only for bad tidings, but for salvation. The government agrees, at least with the first part. The last ten years have seen an unprecedented effort by the government to urge us to be prepared for disaster. They have even reinstated and updated the old Cold War emergency radio alert system, and are stockpiling huge quantities of everything from food and medicine, and other supplies, to coffins. And ammo. All they ask you to do, is to have emergency plans and a ‘go bag,’ or store of emergency foods and critical supplies.

It’s simply good common sense. Preppers have been doing this for decades. What’s your excuse? That they are crazy? Better look in the mirror, if you believe that.

Here are two simple and free tools to help you get started

Both are easy to use Facebook pages. One is a kind of compendium of information regarding the possible breakdown in civil society due to the inability of government to respond, or even perhaps government itself has gone terribly awry. It is called the FEMA, Martial Law, Revolution Database (kind of covers all possibilities). It has no subversive intent, despite the scary title. It is very informative, and can help push anyone teetering on the notion of being prepared into taking action. One way it does this, is by telling you what to expect, and what a good action plan/go bag might look like for a given scenario.

The other also has a scary title, but it implies nothing but what it is; a library. In this case, it is a series of links to critical information one might need to survive for long periods without outside help in a serious catastrophe. It is a collection of how-to survival tricks, and how to quickly and easily make common critical items such as water purification systems, emergency generators, and so forth. It is called the Post Apocalyptic Library. The idea is simple: visit the links, download or copy the information, print it out, and put it into your go bag. Instant expert on a moment’s notice! Many of the links will deserve further exploration of their sites, for other good information. There is always more than one way to solve a problem.

Have you ever wanted a certain soft drink? Well, I’m a Prepper, he’s a Prepper, she’s a Prepper, we’re a Prepper; shouldn’t you be a Prepper, too?

Great. Drink deep for best result.

 

 

Terrorist H. Michael Sweeney’s RAP Sheet


OK, it’s true. There are at least a half-dozen ways the government can ‘claim’ I’m a terrorist. YOU TOO, for that matter. But I have a Record of Arrest and Prosecution ‘sheet’ to illustrate one of the ways I am definitely a terrorist to someone, including people that think I’m merely a conspiracy theorist. I am not ‘mere,’ at anything I do…

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   proparanoidpress.com   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2016, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Please comment any such repost to original posting.

 

What makes you a terrorist when you live in a Police State?

Simple answer: anything you do. There have been so many Constituion trampling Acts of Congress and Executive Orders, all so vaguely worded as to allow the broadest of interpretations, that it is almost just that easy for someone in government to label YOU (and certainly me) a terrorist. That can have very unfortunate consequences, depending on who labels you, why, and what they do about it. You can end up on the no fly list, or some kind of watch list, or even be vanished forever by Men in Black whisking you off in a black van.

One such example is, that being a conspiracy theorist automatically makes you a terrorist according to FBI. That’s bluntly stated, but true, as an article at Public Intelligence illustrates: “A flyer from a series created by the FBI and Department of Justice to promote suspicious activity reporting states that espousing conspiracy theories or anti-US rhetoric should be considered a potential indicator of terrorist activity. ” The flyer, linked in the article, specifically includes 9-11 Truthers (that’s about 1/3 of the U.S. population).

OK; I’m a conspiracy theorist, or if you prefer, a Conspiracy Terrorist. But I am no ordinary ‘theorist,’ because I have a R.A.P. sheet… a Record of Arrests and Prosecutions. And here it is, below the FBI Fellon ID Card (which shows that not even FBI always gets the right man)… but be sure to read the summary text before you wonder why I’m still walking around freely.

hmswanted

R.A.P. Sheet, H.Michael Sweeney

1976  Wire Tapping, 2 counts, charges dropped for insufficient evidence

1980  Embezzling, charges dropped after resignation from company

1983  Counterfeiting, Drug Smuggling, sentenced

1984  Wire Tapping, charges dropped for insufficient evidence

1985  Shoplifting, 4 counts, sentenced

1987  Fraud, Embezzling (pretending to be a Pastor), Bad Checks, charges dropped after restitution

1988  Wire Fraud, 3 counts, sentenced

1988  Smuggling, 2 counts (bioweapons, diamonds), sentenced

1990  Espionage, Interception of Electronic Communications, charges dropped by NSA intervention

1991  Bank Robbery, 4 counts, sentenced

1991  Wire Tapping, 4 counts, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

1992  Fraud, 3 counts, Witness Tampering, 3 counts, Withholding Evidence, 2 counts, Murder,

            cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

1993  Breaking and Entering, 2 counts, Grand Theft, charges dropped after restitution

1994  Wire Tapping, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

1994  Attempted Murder, 12 counts, case turned over to Internal Affairs, and dropped

1996  Espionage, 3 counts, Violation of Civil Rights, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

1998  Wire Tapping, Stalking, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

1998  Grand Theft Auto, Operating Chop Shop, 3 counts, sentenced

1999  Possession of Controlled Substance with Intent to Sell, sentenced

2001  Bioterrorism, Attempted Assassination, investigation closed by DOJ intervention

2002  Terrorism, 4 counts, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

2004  Bioterrorism, case closed due to lack of evidence

2004  Cyberterrorism, Hacking (of CIA’s Web site), charges dropped in exchange for services rendered

2016  Armed Robbery, 2 counts, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

2016  Bank Robbery, cold case due to flight to avoid prosecution

 

Summary Judgement

By now, if you actually read the full list, you realize no one person could be guilty of all those crimes and still be walking free… and that there were crimes on the list immediately after incarceration, and no jail breaks to account for that. This is because these are not crimes that I committed, but crimes I have investigated and exposed, or helped expose and prosecute, often working with Police, FBI, SS, and CIA, sometimes working against rogue elements of those and other agencies, even spy agencies of other governments.

Left out of that list, are perhaps 200 Stalking, Wire Tapping, and Torture cases I’ve worked on as online consultant with victims of such affairs (I’ve had contact with 12,000 individuals in that kind of predicament). I left them out because it would have made the post unreadable, and that’s a shame… a disservice to the thousands of victims of this form of abuse of power and conspiratorial corruption of principalities and powers.

So I do not claim to be a mere terrorist, but to have stopped terrorism. But neither am I a mere conspiracy theorist, because many of the conspiracy theories I’ve investigated have put people in jail, or at least shut them down and forced them to run away. One Governor, possibly two, a National Guard General, an elected County Sheriff, two Police Chiefs, a Criminal Investigation Division Lt., a C.E.O. of an international software firm, and a host of lower law enforcement personnel have all vacated their posts (some being jailed) after I finished doing my thing. While I cannot claim every one of them retired or otherwise departed their posts because of me, as I was not allowed access to official internal documents, I’m fairly certain a good number of them grumbled my name under their breath on the way out the door.

All that said, I hope that you, dear reader, have come to understand that a conspiracy theorist is no different than any other standard investigative force of a more official nature. Except for two small things, we all try to fit the available evidence with the environ of facts to determine the truth. We both form hypothetical postulations as to suspect and motive, prove opportunity and method, and try each point of evidence against all others which might disprove the hypothesis (though as we see all too often, many criminal cases are happy to prosecute the innocent if they think they can make a strong enough case and hide the truth).

We both theorize up front. The first difference is that conspiracy theorists do not have the luxury of making an official determination, while the official investigators do. The second difference, and most important, is that we start with questions regarding failures in logic in the official findings and reports; we question government, which is not only the right, but the DUTY of every citizen, always. How else will you ever find a cover up? We know there have been all manner of cover ups exposed in media over the last few decades, and I remind you, you NEVER have a cover up UNLESS there is a conspiracy, because a cover up itself REQUIRES a conspiracy to execute it, and the affair being covered up is always so complex that it, too, MUST by default represent a conspiracy. Guaranteed.

OK, FBI, come and cuff me… unless I’m wearing a bomb like other terrorists,or have run off to Mexico to escape your ‘justice,’ in which case, just have a better day.

The Death of Proparanoid… again


Yes, Virginia, over the several decades of my personal battles with elements of the intelligence communities of several nations, as well as criminals and terrorists, there have been actual death threats and multiple attempts against my life, attempts to silence me.

I’m still here.

But my voice seems to be dying; I’m being methodically and systemically silenced.

To be sure, that, too, is not the first time it has happened. Some of it has actually been funny, or at least done with a sense of humor by someone with a lot of power, someone a bit more intelligent than the mindless robots normally employed in targeting someone for their political incorrectness.

The NSA was the first to employ technology to silence me. When I was guest on Art Bell’s Coast to Coast with George Noory for three hours. Part of the show was to be on the Flight 800 friendly fire shoot down, where I was going to announce discovery of startling new proofs. About five minutes before I was to be called by C2C staff for hookup, I got a strange call that lasted about 30 seconds. It consisted of nothing but high-speed tones somewhat similar in nature to the sounds of a fax machine…but this was different.

I knew what it was, and had written about it in my books. NSA helped develop the telephone networks we use today working along side of AT&T and also, Bell Laboratories, who were security related clients of mine. SoI recognized these tones as the data packets used to manipulate the phone system’s switching network. There is almost nothing these codes cannot accomplish, and they are part and parcel of how and why NSA’s Echelon gives them complete access to all phone/fax and other telecommunications.

So I went on air as expected, but when we came to the commercial break and it was announced that when we came back, we would offer blockbuster information about flight 800, the stage was set for the dirty trick which would be based on such manipulations. Coast to Coast, like most such syndicated shows in the day, feeds its program by phone to various radio network resources. Now, to make the significance of what happened next, it is important to know this is at a time frame when the official FBI/NTSB investigation was still going on and knee-deep in charges of a cover up, and all three TV networks were owned by military contractors who made various elements of shipboard missile systems or the actual missiles we now know shot down the airliner by accident.

The show continued and the information was revealed. But some weeks later it was learned that a funny (literally) thing had transpired. In the New York/New Jersey Long Island area where the plane went down and the investigation was underway… the same area where the US Navy was hauling select wreckage retrieved from the ocean to junk yards instead of the investigation site where the plan was being reassembled in an attempt to find a cause (so we were told)… I was silenced.

The truth was not to be heard. No. Some clever reworking of the phone system had people who were listening to Art Bell’s show, once the commercial break was over, suddenly found themselves instead listening to rebroadcasts of Art Linkletter’s ‘Kids Say The Darndest Things’ show from decades earlier. To my way of thinking, that’s incredibly creative and funny as dirty tricks go. Once we stopped talking Flight 800, the regular show returned to the airwaves, there. Once the show was over, five minutes later, I got another phone call with the strange tones.

A more physical silencing took place shortly thereafter when I was guest and ‘Field Correspondant’on Michael Corbin’s radio show out of the Denver area. Now he used a real radio station, but also used phones. Got the same tones phone call with that show, too. But more than this, someone took an ax to the cable feeding the show to the radio tower, itself. I was silenced.

Sadly, it was not too long after that that Michael Corbin himself was silenced. After a series of death threats, his home and the radio studio suffered an arson attack, along with one of his vehicles. He called left me a message for advice as he feared for his life, but again, telephone oddities prevented our actually making contact. Three days later, he was found dead in his good car at the side of a highway. It was ruled a heart attack, but he was, as I recall, just over 30 years old, and had no known heart conditions. He was silenced.

Not long after that, my only Web site at the time, proparanoid.com, was hijacked by Men in Black. I was able to investigate it thoroughly and determine two CIA fronts were involved. One of these was Enron, formally known as Hughes Tools, taken over by CIA after the billionaire died. The other was a Web domain proxy service which specialized in registering domain names anonymously so you could not find out who owned them, as well as remarketing domain names… typically hijacked, on behalf of said ‘anonymous’ owners.

Only problem was, it seems they were actually the owners. They also offered hosting services, and ‘just happened’ to own thousands of porn sites thought operated by CIA in order to collect sexual preference information of powerful people, sometimes useful in blackmail efforts. Others in that collection were, in fact, traced to staff members at the firm. The head of the firm had a work history that fit the general profile common to persons running CIA fronts, but the two most condemning clues were closer to smoking guns.

One is, that the servers they used were actually housed in Enron’s headquarters building a few blocks away from… the other site that was a clue; the firm’s business offices were in the same building Lee Harvey Oswald used to work with FBI agent Guy Bannister… the building with two corner entrances, one on each cross street, which opened to the same interior, but each with a different address. This allowed the FBI and, presumably, CIA, to operate multiple fronts from the same offices, but use different addresses so that they would not be linked. It now appears CIA owned that building, and has repurposed it.

The hijacking was not to make a profit, as most such hijacking intends. The typical resale offer for a Web site of my popularity in terms of the number of hits was about $400. But if I was to get my site back, they demanded $157K. No way. I was silenced, at least temporarily, until I could create a new site. Several, actually.

Now we come to my death.

To be completely honest, part of that death is not due to politically motivated intrigues by Men in Black. Certain family affairs, health issues which prevent me from holding a job, as well as my age, perhaps, and general financial issues were clearly involved; they set the stage for and enabled the unexpected assaults. What happened happened covertly, and would take time for me to discover, making it too late to counter.

I lost my home and was forced to live in my car, which means I also lost my ISP service, and my email addys were shut down. Yet somehow, after the email accounts were no longer operational, someone with spoofing skills (cyberwarrior hacker types) sent an email from my closed email account to my Web hosting service and shut down my account, there. This effectively cut off my one source of income beyond my paltry Social Security checks.

Next, they transferred ownership of my domain names to a firm, this time, in Canada. But as I do not now enjoy useful Web access, since I still live on wheels and have no ISP, I can neither investigate the matter or usefully replace the Web sites. Somehow, by the way, they also killed the cached pages in Google and elsewhere about my previous hijacking, which included evidence. I am silenced.

Or not. My wordpress account remains open. Most of my old Web site pages can still be accessed in archived from (e.g., Google proparanoid + a keyword/phrase, and click the little pull-down menu arrow found at the end of the green secondary URL line, and select Cached).

To those who have followed me over the years, bought my books or newsletters, I thank you for your loyalty and kind comments. Death threats aside, I’ve probably had only three people say a consequential bad thing about my work, people who were sincere and intending constructive advice. Those who were simply hateful or who were clearly pushing an agenda, I happily discounted.

I can still be reached by text messages (very short messages, no subject line) at proparanoid at vtext com. I do also attempt infrequent access to my email account at proparanoidgroup at gmail com. You can still order my books using the My Books link at page top. You can still pay for books or send me contributions to proparanoidgroup at gmail com via PayPal. You can also still access my Facebook account under H. Michael Sweeney.

I have been silenced… but you can still hear my muffled words, if you try hard enough.

Proof Eight: Shooting Lines Also Depict Cheops in 3-D Cutaway View


The Great Pyramid in Egypt is one of the Holy of Holies to Masons and some Satanic cults, and is specifically tied in mysticism to the End Times and historical catastrophic events. This one will scare you.

Are there any patterns in mass shootings? 

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   proparanoidpress.com   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2014, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Please comment any such repost to original posting.

Is there any proof mass shootings are not random?

What you will learn reading this post of the posting series

•  that select shooting lines form a 3-D perspective view of Cheaps and transparent depiction of all inner passages;
•  that there are specific ties between Cheops and the goal of the New World Order;
• that Cheops is a kind of key to understanding European Illuminati/Templar relationships to mass shootings.

Are mass shootings by intelligent design?

Proof Eight: Shooting Lines Also Depict Cheops in 3-D Cutaway View

Is there a mass shooting conspiracy?

Mysteries of Cheops

In the prior post we saw ties between shooting event lines which formed Masonic and Satanic symbols, and a series of orange lines which led us to the Great Pyramid, Cheops, in Egypt. While those were quite remarkable and sufficiently consistent to defy any chance of random coincidence, what follows will dramatically make concrete the notion of intelligent design as well as the importance of Cheops to said design. And finally, we will see there is yet another way to look at Cheops’ roll in the Illuminati/Templar and mass shooting tie-ins, but this time, from the European point of view.

First, we need to understand a bit about Cheops and its importance in mysticism. There is so much which could be said that there are literally countless books on topic which could be entered as ‘evidence.’ Here, I will focus on less than five percent of such material topically, only able to skim the surface of them. Consider it merely to whet your appetite to learn more, for which some suggested links will be provided along the way.

One key aspect of Cheops is that it is rich with magic numbers. This seems to be true regardless of if using the original units of measure employed by ancient Egyptians, or modern day equivalents. Indeed, some of our current units of measure stem directly from the ancient Egyptian measuring system, a fact often laid at the feet of Freemasons and their predecessors, the Masons. While I won’t spend time expounding, many of the measurements of Cheops, both in original and modern increments, enjoy magic number properties, doing so in ways which, like those illustrated in the prior post, are mind boggling. Some serious mathematicians have found even more wondrous relationships to both the ancient and modern discoveries of Man well beyond any possible knowledge to Egyptians of old.

Perhaps the keymost aspect of Cheops which potentially makes it ideal for inclusion in mass shooting patterns is that it is only the Giza Pyramid which has a complex of inner passageways and rooms. Early mystics and even some studies of Cheops by persons with scientific credentials and methods, have proposed and illustrated a belief that the construction of Cheops was an enlightened project involving supernatural or mystical knowledge of the future; the internal passages and chambers thought to be a roadmap to End Times and key events along the way. That is represented by the image, below, from this interesting Web site. Others out there (with less useful images) have more detail with the most recent/current annotation being the year 2010, roughly the height of mass shootings. That marking is in the King’s Chamber, which implies ‘control and authority.’

ONE Egyptian Inch = 1 Year of History. From gizapyramid.com (click).

Of specific interest to mass shooting research and the notion of Illuminati Masonic Warlocks being the architects, thereof, is the fact that shooting lines can be found which quite correctly depict a pyramid across thousands of miles of the United States. More than this, they quite usefully do so in 3-D rendition, even to the point of detailing the inner passageways found in Cheops. In fact, the depiction is so uncanny as to have key aspects ‘to scale’ with measurements which work math magic using modern increments of measure against the ancient’s units of measure; not just scale in size, but across the barriers of time in the expression of numbers in different languages and cultures. Take a look:

 Do the pyramids really relate the entire history of the World from beginning to end?

Shootings depict Cheops

Pyramid

Left: perspective transparent view; Right: inner view of interior passages. Remarkably, it took only 9 shooting lines, and 14 shootings, to depict the pyramid and passages. However, 5 shootings stand alone (not on lines), meaning 9 are, giving us again the magical 99/18 result.

As you may recall from the prior proof the orange lines are lines which run from shootings directly to the Great Pyramid, Cheops, each exactly 500 miles apart as measured along a given line which is perpendicular to them all, and which itself runs through several shootings. The green line here, however, is at the distance of 10,000 miles from Cheops, which is one/fourth the distance around the World (the vertical diameter being 40,008 miles on average), and it too transverses several shootings and is perpendicular, but the distance at this point between lines is 505 miles.  Each orang line originates dead center of Cheops and is separated by almost exactly 7.5 degrees of arc to achieve this feat. That is interesting for another reason; 360 degrees divides by 7.5 exactly 48 times, and 24,000 miles (the rough diameter of the Earth horizontally), divided by 48 indeed equals 500 miles.

Now there are some admitted problems in trying to depict a pyramid with any degree of accuracy in a 3-D perspective view, especially if with cutaway to reveal interior passages. Such a view does not simply allow us to measure a line and compare it to Cheops with good expectation of results. Perspective causes a measured horizontal to be less as it is depicted further away. A line transiting diagonally in one or more axis in 3-D space is even less useful unless one knew the precise angles for each axis both it and the original against which it was to be compared, were employing (and additionally, the depiction version is arbitrarily decided by the person rendering it, and impossible to discern without their sharing).

Cheops!

As the satellite view is at a an angle, the ‘center’ is based on the base, not the peak.

The depiction in this case seems slanted over America as if about to slide into the Caribbean. That is for a reason: it is faced (viewed) with the same face (view) as the actual Cheops is when following the orange lines, there  — presuming in both cases one is looking from the center orange line towards it. That is to say, looking at Cheops in America from the center of the lines, would give you this same perspective view if standing in the center in Egypt. That cannot be coincidence.  The problem with that, however, is that in Egypt, in relation to the Orange lines, one corner is clearly (looking down from Google Earth) nearer the observer’s position than another; there is no line which is not at an angle to the observer.

Note: I further feel it is an error to assume that modern-day Illuminati Warlocks have the skills and knowledge base, or event he interest in the crafts and mathematics of Masonry, which they left to the Adepts when Templer remnants infiltrated the Mason’s Guild and eventually took it over to form Freemasons. They are not likely going to go for precise renderings as much as symbolism; accurate to the point which can be managed simply, but no more, I believe.

 Why do Masons, the Illuminati, and Satanists focus on Egypt and Cheops?

How much is a Royal Cubit, anyway?

It is, as result, impossible to establish a precise method or true consistency in relationships (i.e., to test for accuracy in scale) of measurements between Cheops and the American pyramid. The required data and accuracy required to plug into complex formula is beyond our ability to deduce. Ideally, a computer program modling in true 3-D space could be used to compute and confirm such comparisons… if we knew the angles employed by the architect of the American depiction.

But that does not mean we give up. We do the best we can with the tools at hand, and must come away at the very least acknowledging that in the 3-D layout, the mere visual similarities alone are sufficiently ‘coincidental’ to imply intelligent design, and in need of further study with better tools. But that does not mean we cannot ‘cheat,’ and then test to see if our cheat had any merit. After all, perhaps the architects employed a similar gambit. We wont’ know unless we try, ourselves. So…

By rotating the view as I have in the image above, we at least have the illusion that the base line is perpendicular to our viewing angle such that we are tempted to measure it anyway, and then see if there is any discerned relationship to Cheops which results in some kind of conversion factor. If we CAN find one, we can then apply that factor against other test lines and, in theory, if or factor was arrived at by other than coincidental happenstance, we should find the measurements work out correctly in the conversion. Guess what? We can, and it does!

Cheops on a side is 440 Royal Cubits, or 36524 Egyptian inches (a precise year’s worth of inches times 100), which works out to 230.4 m, or 756 feet. I will admit that finding a conversion factor took me some time. I made no headway at all until I realized that the orange lines were like rays of a projection lens in a theater, taking a small image and projecting it to be much larger at a distance. I reasoned there had to be something about analogy involved in the conversion factor.  I also felt that any such conversion MUST involve the ancient increments in some conversion to the modern, rather than a modern to modern comparison. Turned out true.

As I discovered, if you divide 36524 by 440 you find that there are 83.009 Egyptian inches in a Royal Cubit. Funny. Both sum to 20. If you then multiply this times the total degrees of arc for the American depiction, which is three orange lines, or 22.5 degrees (±.03), you end up with 1867.7, which is exactly the measurement of the depicted base line… in Kilometers; ancient to modern, using the orange lines as calculator. So, now to test the accuracy and intent, vs. the notion of coincidence (pretty big coincidence, if that is all it is.)

Testing our factor: There are only a couple of other places where lines are similarly ‘perpendicular’ to our view (like the base line) by our peculiar method of so assessing for the purpose. Two of these are passageways to the King and Queens chambers, which just happen to have shootings (house icons employed for this use to match the drawings of the actual Cheops chambers) at the approprate locations to at least approximate the inner passages with an appropriate resemblance. But there is a problem with trying to test these with our conversion factor. It has to do with the Mississippi River.

Looking at the drawing of Cheops’ interior, you will note there is an irregular passageway leading down between the upward and the downward sloping passages. This is thought by some to be a water drain, as there are interior air vents which happen to align with prominent Constellation stars on select key celestial event dates, and that admits water. The lower passage in fact has a chamber with a deep pit which resembles a Well. In America, as it happens, the Mississipi River runs a course reasonably similar to that passageway and at the appropriate points in our depiction, given some small fudge factor.

Clearly, the Illuminati has no control over the course of the Mississipi, which changes slowly with time, and therefor, any depiction of the inner passageways must in some way accommodate those changes. My conclusion is, therefore, that such accommodation would necessarily mean a skewing of measurement accuracy in these passageways. Indeed, no line among them which is angled, nor the passages to the King/Queen chambers, quite works out, though some come closer to doing so than others.

But there is an entirely different story in play once we get past that drainage passageway, at the v