Fake News and Its Suppression: Who Benefits?


Fake News is a political weapon which is designed to cut two ways into your freedoms, and send us deeper into the grip of the New World Order. This case study reveals it.

by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com   Facebook   proparanoid.net  

copyright © 2016, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or link to original posting.
x

What is Fake News?

Depends on who you ask, and when.
x
Were you to ask me or the next guy, say five or ten years ago, the answer would likely be ‘fake news web sites,’ those sites which feature click bait ‘BREAKING!’ headlines which are shockingly unbelievable… but just plausible enough to get you to click. If you bother to Google, you often find the story has already been debunked by someone, or that the image used is other than claimed. You also have to worry about sites like the Onion, which use deliberately over the top ‘fake news’ as a form of politically commentary.
x
The stories found at fake news sites, rich with advertising to make them money for your trouble, offer no cited source, no links to a verifying source, typically have no byline (author) cited, or the author is nobody you ever heard of, and they don’t have an About US, or it is next to useless. Often, the site is truly fake, pretending to look like a legitimate news source, either by name, or outright theft of ‘look and feel’ of a mainstream site (i.e., abcnews.com.co has NOTHING to do with ABC news, despite use of their logo). Channel7news.com has nothing to do with any news station, though designed to look like it does.
x
Were you to ask, today, at least half of the country, would additionally answer, Government, and Mainstream Media. Time and again they have been caught promoting stories proven to be false, always for political reasons. In the most recent Presidential campaign, the bias of media was so extreme and visible, that they no longer bothered to fact check Democrat/Hillary claims, and spent endless time fostering false narratives about Trump, story after story after story.
x
medialies
x
By way of example: If Trump said (and he did) “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’ll be able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” suddenly Hillary and media were claiming Trump was asking Russia to spy on Hillary… twisting the meaning of very clear words intending no such thing, but instead implying Hillary’s sloppy personal server emails were a National Security Risk, already very likely to have been hacked by (anyone who cared to do so), while at the same time highlighting the criminality suspected in the deletion of emails prior to FBI investigation.
x
But if you ask Democrats, or Government, or Media, it is only Web sites which have been critical of THEM or their own ‘news’ stories. They would include Activists and Conspiracy Theorist reviews such as Alex Jones, and actual legitimate news sites which dared go against mainstream in the election, such as FOX News, RT News. Well, I don’t trust FOX to be ‘fair and balanced,’ or ‘unafraid,’ either, but I’ve never seen RT do anything but expose things needing exposing, and reporting verifiable facts, and conduct verbatim interviews without talking over and interrupting, as is common to US mainstream. They would also include virtually all Conservative viewpoint sources, and many neutral sources long accepted as offering verifiable content, such as World Net Daily, Breitbart.
x
The scary part of these lists, which is nothing more than political blacklisting, is that there is a clear focus as to who is being targeted. Yes, they lump in with those they wish to ‘target’ by such labeling, actual fake sites, such as Before Its News and Federal Jack, and that is intended to legitimize via guilt by association inclusion of sites they wish to destroy for political reasons. But when you examine the list, you find out that there is such a focus; it is conservatives (opposed to the current liberal Democrats in power), Orthodox religious sites vocally opposed to select liberal policies, such as abortion, and anyone who faults Global Warming.
x
damlies.jpg
x
In fact, the primary accusation is: “This site publishes information that cannot be validated and that is anti scientific fact.” The grammatical error is theirs (‘that,’ instead of ‘which’). News sites which cite and links to their source can be validated. If you have a problem with the source, go after them. Scientific Fact? What is that? Science continually reverses and revises itself as more is learned over time. When something like Global Warming is involved, where you have legions of scientists who disagree with scientists who have a vested interest in the ‘official science’ for political reasons, the expression ‘anti-science’ is itself propaganda, and disinformation; fake news. Science is only theory until proven and accepted as fact, and that’s clearly not the case when scientists themselves cannot agree, and there is a political agenda involved — in this case the New World Order’s wish to establish Carbon Tax, Carbon Currency, and Carbon Credits.
x
In short, the whole Fake News, as news, in the news, is itself, manufactured Fake News for political purposes. It is so fake, in fact, that many sites listing fake news, do not even identify themselves and tend to pop up overnight, which likely means they are created through the Democrats, Establishment Republicans, George Soros, or their cronies. They, themselves, are fake. Example: fakenewschecker.com
x

How to fight fake news

The problem with fake news as a tactic, even when from media, the Democrat machine, the Establishment Republicans, the CIA or FBI (Agency or individual rogue Agents), George Soros, or from sources in other countries, and of course, professional fake news Web sites, Conspiracy Theorists who don’t know jack, or anyone else… is it is EASY to see if it fake or at least suspect enough to look closer. Do they cite their source with a link? Do they give a byline? Do they dare offer an About Us which is useful?
x
HOWEVER, this only happens (looking closer) if you/we CARE. By heaping fake news upon us continually and endlessly with one thing after another, from fake source after fake source, and through ‘legitimate’ sources, as well — as they have ever since Trump threw his ring into the hat, the defenses of those who support truth and/or trump, or both, are worn down, and we become lax, thinking this, too, shall pass. We stop bothering to look, and presuming that because we see the lie, that others will too, before being hoodwinked. No. They won’t. Apathy and laziness reign.
x
idiots.jpg
x
This is why fake news works; apathy and presumptions allow it to be spread unopposed on social media. The only way to fight it is to relentlessly point it out: “Fake News: no source cited, no links to verify, no author, see what was actually said, here (link).” Or similar. IT IS THEREFORE UP TO EVERY CITIZEN TO REJECT FAKE NEWS, SEEK IT OUT, PROTEST IT, EXPOSE IT, and DECRY THE SOURCES, ALL WHO REPEAT IT, AND ALL WHO BELIEVE IT, ALL WHO BENEFIT BY IT IN THEIR SILENCE.Always check About Us, if they dare have one.
x

Case Study in fake news of the most dangerous and treasonous kind.

 
At the time of this writing, the pushers of the latest and most dangerous fake news are the Democrats, Establishment Republicans, Soros, the current Democrat Government, and George Soros. Their real TARGET AUDIENCE is, in this case, the Electoral College voters who are still being exposed to the avalanche of lies, lies, lies. A lie repeated often enough, in the company of more lies in support, eventually seem as if the truth. The core lie (fake news), is that Trump, Putin, Wikileaks, and select FBI officials conspired against Hillary. Specifically, that Putin hacked the DNC and shared files damaging to Hillary with Wikileaks, in support of Trump, and that Trump conspired with FBI to refute those charges.
x
49279830.cached.jpg
x
It is wholly inconceivable that a Conspiracy can be formed by a single business man, a high ranking FBI agent, the Russians via Putin, and a non partisan Web leaking service (Wikileaks). If they can make enough Electoral College voters believe this lie, the outcome of the election comes into question. The stakes are high, and the hope is that there are enough fools to follow. To believe this latest fake news, you have to believe that:
x
a) that Wikileaks is a tool of Putin, a Fake News story planted by who? The Democrats. Planted when? When Wikileaks releases happened to revolve around Hillary. Who benefits? Democrats/Hillary;
x
b) that Trump bribed people in FBI to refute Russian hacking, a Fake News story planted by who? The Democrats. Planted when? After they lost the election. Who benefits? Democrats/Hillary;
x
c) that Trump and Putin have colluded or that Putin has elected to support Trump over Hillary. Collusion is a Fake News story planted by who? Hillary. Planted when? In the middle of a hard political fight. Who Benefits? Democrats/Hillary. As to wether or not Putin would prefer and support Trump, such is HIS RIGHT, as it is true for every individual and nation on the planet. The U.S. acts to sway elections in other countries, and should expect other countries to seek influence in our own. Hell, we even used mind control on the entire country of Bosnia to sway their elections using Command Solo Aircraft, as admitted by USAF;
x
d) that Putin risked an international incident, and arranged for the DNC computer to be hacked in order to share with Wikileaks, a Fake News story planted by who? The Democrats/Hillary? Planted when? In the heat of the campaign, and again well after they had lost. Who benefits? Democrats/Hillalry. If this was not fake news, why did the ‘honorable’ Democrat Congressmen NOW calling for investigation not call for it on day one? In truth, we now learn, John Podesta’s own personal carelessness with an obvious email phishing ploy lead to the least, and not hacking in the traditional sense as claimed by the Democrats, such that… (see next);
x
e) that all 17 US Intelligence Agencies agree that hacking by the Russians took place and shared with Wikileaks, which means the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the 16 INDEPENDENT agencies beneath it, EACH INDEPENDENTLY came to like conclusion through THEIR INDEPENDENT DETECTION/INVESTIGATION. This includes very unlikely Agencies, such as DEA, Atomic Energy, and each spy arm of the U.S. Military, non of which monitor anything more than those Web resources which impact on THEIR INDIVIDUAL MISSIONS. This Fake News was planted by who? Hillary. When? During the heat of the campaign, and again later, after loosing, renewed by Democrats. Who benefits? Democrats/Hillary. Again, if TRUE THEN, why wait until NOW to get upset about it enough to call for investigation? Email Phishing happens all the time, to everyone, and is way-too easy to detect to have been a sophisticated hacking effort by the Russians. It was Podesta’s stupidity, and nothing, else;
x
DO YOU SEE ANY PATTERN HERE, at all? But wait. We are not done, yet. Who are the other players in EACH and EVERY case? The same liberal media outlets that promoted Democrat/Hillary’s other campaign lies through the campaign. Soros. Many of the same Establishment Republicans who can’t stand loosing power to the People. So, who are the real conspirators, here? If you think about it, every player… Republican and Democrat Establishment, Hillary, controlled media, Soros… they are all part of The New World Order, either as front-line politicians with treasonous intent, or manipulated minions obeying orders.
x
I say Treason, because the NWO seeks above all else to destroy the sovereignty of all nations in favor of a One World Government; when your own congressional members and President seek to abandon your own laws and the Constitution in favor of Global laws contrary to your own, it is destruction of sovereignty, and therefore, Treason. When they are Bilderbergers or members of Skull and Bones or the Round Table Groups, which either require oaths which disavow the Laws of the Land or have policies and/or mission statements which support a One World Government, that is a violation of the Oath of Office, and is Treason.
x

Fake News real goal and threat: Democracy, the Constitution, Freedom

If those in media and government who deem themselves sole authority on what is and is not fake news are allowed to do so, We, The People, are doomed. In the tradition of the New World Order ploy of ‘creating a problem’ in order to ‘provide a solution,’ which was pre determined to achieve a hidden agenda, fake news outcry was launched specifically in order to proved just such a solution. By problem-solution-agenda, I mean that the solution just happens to be ready to go in time for immediate application (strike while the iron is hot… the people are lathered up and ripe for exploitation), and has some draconian underpinnings not readily visible without close scrutiny.
x
Example: As I first exposed in the Professional Paranoid Newsletter, and later in my books, The Patriot Act was already written prior to 9-11. Homeland Security was established secretly two years to the day prior to 9-11, but enabled by the Patriot Act, so it could be immediately ‘activated.’ Now comes fake news, and it, too, has ‘just in time’ legislation already written.
x
And lo and behold, both the House and the Senate have Bills already quietly being passed to counter ‘fake news.’ In the Senate, we have the Countering Disinformation and  Propaganda Act, and in the House, HR6393, part of the Annual Defense Intelligence Authorization Act, which has been amended to target ‘Russian Propaganda’ and, by association, other forms of ‘fake news.’
x
Now, the links provided above by me are deliberately from sites being officially declared by government and media as ‘fake news,’ but I defy you to find anything fake in their reporting. They give you the links to the actual material so you can judge for yourself, and reveal anything fake in their presentation. THAT does not meet my criteria for fake news, but because their report is contrary to the official story government would prefer, essentially whistle-blowing, it meets government’s criteria, and by extension, that of a controlled and biased media.
x
The scary part is this. Both of these acts give the government the power to establish what is effectively a Ministry of Truth (a la Orwell’s 1984), which can ultimately be used to completely shut down all dissenting voice in America and elsewhere, especially on the Web. It also can lead to establishing punishment for saying things publicly which oppose government, a de facto sedition law which inhibits free speech. That is one of things we went to war with King George over. 
x
Add into all this the additional censoring by Google and Facebook, and all you are going to be able to do is ‘guess’ what the truth is. Try using Google or any of the major engines to find something out using controversial or heated topics which oppose the official story. It used to be you got exactly what you requested. But now, you mostly get official versions up front, as if you didn’t really know exactly what to type in what you were looking for, and they figured that out, for you. To find what you are actually looking for, you may have to go pages and pages deep into the results.
x
Example: For this post, I typed in “What did trump really say about russian hacking” which produces almost exclusively opinions about what Trump said, not what he actually said. Even the one which comes close, does not go back to his original quote. It took me quite a long time to actually get back to his original quote. This is censorship for political purposes, in this case reflecting the desired liberal/Democrat and Establishment Republican desire to destroy non establishment Trump. To find the truth, ‘guessing’ will not cut it, and neither will accepting media, Google, or government’s claims, et. al.
x
Dig! Dig! Dig!
x

Related Posts:

Psyops TV: How They Dumb You Down and Set You Up
Fascistbook: The Growing Case for Government Targeting via Social Media
x
Advertisements

About Author H. Michael Sweeney

Author of privacy/security/abuse of power, Founder Free Will Society, PALADINs (Post Apocalyptic Local Area Defense Information Network)

Posted on December 14, 2016, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: