Blog Archives

Statistics Prove Gun Control No Solution; a Political Ruse

Statistics prove gun control is no solution; gun violence is a political ruse.

Taking away guns does not stop psychiatric care-sponsored killings: pseudo science and drug industry profits are the real killer

by H. Michael Sweeney, copyright © 2012, all rights reserved. Permissions to duplicate in full with all links and credits in tact hereby granted, provided they point to and include this notice.
Was Sandy Hook Shooting a multiple shooter conspiracy?
Updated 4/10/13: Proof media and government don’t want you to know the truth and employ disinfo tactics instead, re ‘gun control.’ Changes and pointers to related material indicated with RED TEXT.

Reading this post you will learn

1)   Statistics show the worst shooters are victims of mind altering drugs given under ‘psychiatric care’ with poor or no supervision;
2)   They also show that when denied access to guns, people find more gruesome means to kill, even in mass murder;
3)   That such drugs have a history tied to CIA mind control research in a class I call mind control enabling psychotropics;
5)   That the ONLY winner in gun control is tyranny.
Who is lying about the guns used in Sandy Hook, and why?
Official portrait of George H. W. Bush, former...

Official portrait of George H. W. Bush, former President of the United States of America. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Portrait of DoD Mr. J. Danforth Quayle, Vice P...

USAF portrait of Vice President J. Danforth Quayle (Wikipedia photo)

Update: The mass murder attempt in Texas yesterday employing a knife and response by media proves a couple of key points regarding the validity and reasons behind gun control efforts. Additionally, Mr. Sorento, Presidential pretender, is blindsiding Congress and the public when he gives speeches on gun control.

1) There are a rash of ‘copy me’ mainstream news articles using the same exact text/images/headline claiming that mass knife attacks are RARE according to experts. Other media have at least reworded the same message, but remain parroting an official line. This is blatantly false as the statistics show, below, marked now in Red. This blog has cited more than 20 examples of mass murders or attempts using weapons other than guns, specifically to point out that taking away guns does not stop murderers.

2) Other articles and news sources (TV/Radio) are trying to spin the knife attacks in support of gun control by offhand remarks such as ‘If he had used a gun, there would have been more deaths.” Perhaps so, but who is to say his intent was to actually kill — else he would have chosen a weapon with a longer blade. More to the point, if students had been allowed to conceal carry, HE would have been dead with reduced bloodshed of innocents.

3) Sorento gives his speeches before a 100% manufactured crowd of supporters with absolutely no opposing viewpoints allowed, This gives the illusion that NO ONE in their right mind could possibly disagree. This is result of his illegal quashing of 1st Amendment Rights by signing the so-called Federal Buildings and Grounds Restrictive Act. This Law allows Police to eject, even arrest anyone who protests on government property or anywhere near events where government officials are appearing publicly. This is nothing less than subtle disinfo blind siding. End update.

Arguing to take away guns ‘that have no use to a hunter’ is to ignore the fact that the 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with hunting, and everything to do with insuring government does not abuse their power over the people. It is intended to be a form of checks and balances to tyranny, and nothing less.

We clearly need it now more than ever, given the rapid loss of freedoms to government’s paranoiac response to ‘terrorism,’ a crime of questionable attribute, at best, and one which kills fewer Americans than results from wrongful deaths at the hands of law enforcement.

My idea of gun legislation, therefore, is to give me the right to pack a government provided SAM missile launcher and Apache helicopter, not merely some bolt-action rifle I pay for at my own expense — in part because pistols and single shot rifles do little to deter soldiers able to pick you off from a distance with their sniper rifles… and DHS is spending billions to stockpile enough ammunition to kill everyone in North America, including some 9 million rounds of sniper bullets. I have to ask why, and fear the answer is the T-word.

Why does the government want to take your guns away? Martial Law is why.

Lets be clear

No one wants to take away from the legitimate concerns of victims of senseless murders of innocents as underscored so horribly in the recent rash of mass shootings. It is right to be angry and to grieve with introspective analysis and to seek a solution to prevent such heinous acts as so painfully evident in the massacre of children and adults in Connecticut. And all Americans and people elsewhere in the World are victims, too… we all are forced to suffer some lesser anguish in our compassion for those who lost family members and friends in these events.

But please, do not become yet another kind of victim by taking the bait and blaming guns, not even a particular kind of gun, especially when inconsistencies and the very nature of official statements of evidence suggest either a conspiracy of shooters is being foisted upon us as yet another ‘crazed lone gunman,’ or lies are offered in a conspiracy within government to force gun control upon us… or both.

How, for instance, in Sandy Hook, is it possible for the Coroner to cite to media with law enforcement at his side that everyone was killed by a rifle, when State and local Police had already stated that only handguns were found in the school with the shooter’s body (first, two, then four pistols), and the only rifle found was in the shooter’s locked trunk?

There are other questions, but not as many as found in Aurora’s theater shooting. These kind of nagging ‘conspiracy theory’ questions for which the public deserves to have answers are always ignored, of course, because, ‘they are merely conspiracy theorists’ doing the asking… even when persons of credentials ask. Thus the truth, including the real cause of ‘gun violence,’ is never explained.

Why are there so many ties between Sandy Hook and Aurora?

Right in front of our eyes all along

And yet, the real cause has been right before your eyes the whole time, but deliberately veiled by corporate and government forces allied for varied agenda. I first wrote about the problem in my book, Fatal Rebirth (a four volume look at crimes of the New World Order which predicted Sept. 11 attacks, an assassination attempt which took place, and mass shootings of the kind we face, now, and so much more). I also wrote about it in my books on Political Control Technology, such as MC Realities.

A ten-year research effort for these books, as well as personal family experiences, made it all-too-clear.  It is subsequently verified by statistics and other information you can easily verify for yourself: the real culprit is a thirst for power and control, both financial and political. Their weapon is disinformation, and chemicals. As such, then, it is imperative that we look both at mass shooting events as well as political assassination events; both being used to effect political change against the natural will of the people and course of governments. It is, after all, yet another form of mind control for the masses: change the mood and the will of the people with lies.

Are mass shootings sponsored by the CIA or military?

Start with the Congressional Record

If you are closed-minded about the possibility of mind control and see it as mere tin-foil hat nonsense, then you are already a victim of CIA’s Operation Mockingbird, and should skip this section because you will not wish to be confused by the facts. It might even be harmful to your psyche to learn you have been manipulated by a form of mind control called disinformation, aka propaganda. Mockingbird put thousands of CIA agents directly into media at all levels from management to reporters and anchor persons… to make sure you got all the news that’s fit to distort.

The Church and Rockefeller Commission findings of the 1970s regarding CIA mind control research further revealed all manner of inhumane MC research and non consensual testing on unwitting human subjects. It is clear that among even worse atrocities, CIA was keen to develop drugs that could control a person’s mind to the point that they would do anything commanded, even to kill themselves or others; the Manchurian Candidate, or ‘programmable person.’

There is much more I could write on this topic, but I do not wish to cause readers not open to the notion to stop reading, for there are more important things yet to discuss. I suggest Alex Constantine’s book, Psychic Dictatorship in the USA, for those wanting the gory details, and my book, MC Realities, to learn about the development of psychotropic mind altering drugs (mind control enabling drugs) by Eli Lilly under ex CIA director George Herbert Walker Bush and Dan Quayle as company executives… the very drugs we are about to see quite tied to the type of gun violence of which this article speaks.

When media controls what you think, you are a victim of mind control

Gun violence: Look at the Statistics

The first mass shooting of note in America was the Texas Tower sniper murder of 13 at the University of Texas, Austin, in 1966. From that time forward there have been countless incidents, so many, in fact, that media hardly thinks to look at the big picture, all-too preoccupied with the gory details of the most recent events. Convenient for them and government, perhaps…

…as it does not serve hidden agenda if you compare today with yesterday and learn that there is a pattern of significant relevance which is clearly being withheld from you. You make your decisions based on the colored view of blood-red tinted glasses fitted with blinders of ‘current news.’ There is a reason I call it the Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Media Complex. What makes you think ‘free press’ has anything to do with American media, a media largely controlled by less than a dozen people, exactly as the Congressional Record cited to be all that was needed to control the press. The statistics will reveal it all…

SSRI medication was developed by CIA as a mind control enabling drug

What mass shootings and assassination events have in common:

It is so rare to find otherwise, that I dare say every such shooting has many, if not all, of the same key ingredients in place: a) prior psychiatric care involving the use of prescribed mind-altering drugs (pscyhotropics, generally of the SSRI variety — Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors such as Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, and dozens of others); b) a triggering event based on emotional stress or trauma or the curtailing of or failure in treatment processes, such as failing to take medication or overdosing; and in all-too-many cases, c) the otherwise ‘coincidental’ peripheral presence in their lives of military, CIA, or other persons, firms, or organizations associated in some way with mind control technology.

Note: there is another kind of triggering event for the Machurian Candidate style of programmed shooter, the kind of person used as a disposable patsy, because they tend not to be very effective as actual killers. The best example is, perhaps, Sirhan Sirhan, who emptied his gun at Robert Kennedy but hit him, not, according to modern forensic review: Kennedy was shot from behind, and upward. Such persons are programmed in advance to do a specific thing upon hearing or reading a select unusual triggering phrase.

Such phrases are offered once to cause them to pay attention (throws a mental switch). It is then subsequently repeated twice close together to cause them to carry out the instructions (initiates a command sequence). Interesting, then, that in Sandy Hook, that a particular Web set published the following phrase three times, once as title, and twice in the text: “Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre.”

This was published on the same day as the Aurora shooting, in which the film, The Dark Knight Rises, shows a map of the villain’s attack plans with Sandy Hook (a district of Gotham City renamed to Sandy Hook for the film, for some unknown reason) as the place next to be struck. And yet, it is strange things like this which get us conspiracy theorists labeled as ‘nuts’ by media that you might be more comfortable in ignoring us, instead of thinking for yourself. How comfortable are you, right now?

The rush to gun control serves the NWO agenda for a one World government

SSRI drugs cause violent thoughts and deeds as side effects

SSRI drugs are killers, both by suicide and by murderous acts committed by those taking them. There is a remarkable summary of this phenomenon at, a Web site which just a few years ago listed perhaps only 50 or 60 examples, but today cites about 5,000 cases which illustrate the problem. The link sorts them by the general nature of the case, but you can sort by date or location, or any other heading.

A quick review reveals some startling examples, which I shall first outline in terms of the dangerous aspects of the drug class and its propensity for sponsoring unchecked violence in patients, and then more specifically relate to mass murders and assassinations, gun violence ahead of other forms of murder.

Why do ‘scientists’ and ‘doctors’ of excellent educational qualifications fail to realize, in light of these known side effects: every physical person has a unique physiology, DNA, and dietary makeup, and thus, it is impossible to predict the results of a given infusion of chemicals into a body where, especially in the brain, the EXISTING balance of chemical makeup is not prepared to suffer alterations with kindly result. Why then, do they persist on guessing at initial dosage levels, and then upping the ante when results are not deemed adequate, until side effects make it clear the med will not help, and then switch them to another med, and start all over again? It is witchcraft-level insanity, and it is guaranteed to have negative outcome.

It is NOT science, nor is it MEDICINE.

It is important to realize even this massive list is only a tip of the iceberg. It ONLY represents reports by family members, doctors, organizations, and other select researchers who were examining and reporting purely from the medical viewpoint. Further, as many of the reports are voluntary contributions, it represents only reports from people who happened to learn of the Web site’s existence and who were moved to report, and, moreover, is limited to reports from people who came to realize the relationship of events to the drug. For this reason, you will not find mentions of assassinations of note, such as my research indicates should be included (name ANY assassination attempt in modern American history, and you will likely find it true).

Among the reports (and a couple of details from my own research) we find court rulings and law enforcement investigative findings which frequently place the blame squarely on the drugs, and not the violent person, in some cases causing the courts not to elect punishment — even for capital crimes involving death. Here is your summary of drug induced violence:

Suicides are very convenient in a conspiracy

Let’s talk suicides:

1)   Over 250 reports involve suicides only, and many times that number include suicide as aftermath to other violence, such as arson, murder, and so forth. Suicide is almost the norm after such drug-caused violence;

2)   One attorney reports he has had a total of 73 calls about suicides from just one specific SSRI;

3)   Indiana county study shows 41% of all suicides involved SSRIs

4)   Wisconsin study shows 54% of teen suicides involved SSRIs

5)   Sweden study shows 52% of women suicides involved SSRIs

6)   Report shows US military suffers 18 suicides a day, 40% on SSRIs

7)   Multiple reports of suicide pacts where all participants were on SSRIs

8)   Another 200 questionable deaths listed which may have been suicides.

9)   EVERY SSRI lists suicidal thoughts as a side effect

10) Suicide attempts often involve the most painful and horrific, and least effective means, such as blow torch, grinders, etc., or the most illogical, such as trying to jump out of an airliner, or stripping naked and wandering off into a winter wilderness.  Suicide by Cop is quite popular, as are head-on and other fatal car crashes, for which statistics are likely quite under reported.

Manchurian candidate murderers are always ruled as acting alone

Let’s talk murders:

 1)   Over 1,200 reports of murder attempts, about one fourth of them followed by suicide or attempts;

2)   Within one week of returning home, nearly a dozen soldiers on SSRIs killed their wives;

3)   Methods vary widely: when guns were not available, almost any means might be employed, including additional reports under other categories, such as vehicular homicide, arson, and so forth (roughly another 100 cases). Details follow.

 Conspiracy must exist if there is a cover up in place

Of interest (or no interest, really) to TSA and FAA:

1)   Nearly two dozen incidents involving violence on an airplane or at an airport;

2)   Individual reports of eleven private plane crashes killing 24 people blamed on SSRIs;

3)   Airline Industry study reveals 100 crash pilots using SSRIs;

4)   At least one hijacking was initiated by an SSRI user.

 No one goes ‘crazy’ without some triggering event – contrived or coincidental

How about kidnapping and hostage taking?

 1)   About twenty instances linked to SSRIs;

2)   Seven instances involve schools and students as victims.

 When you hear ‘lone shooter,’ think ‘conspiracy cover up.’

How about arson and bombing?

 1)   80 arson events, three involving schools, two events where school administrators on SSRI set fires at home;

2)   35 bombing instances, two involving schools.

 CIA lies to put their own men in post of Chief, Spokesperson, and head of Internal Affairs

Other Killing Sprees?

 1)   Remember the rash of US Postal Worker rage shootings? Most were SSRI;

2)   About two dozen instances of fast food chains, trains and busses, churches, banks and other offices, and even a country club and a nursing home;

3)   More than 30 incidents at schools, about 1/3rd of which were SSRI, including virtually every event which made national or international news;

 Gun control is a codeword for police state control

And when there is no gun available?

 1)   One 17 year old holds 20 children and teacher hostage at point of a sword. So if you take all the guns, better get all the swords, too;

2)   A Mother attacks her son with a sword. See what I mean?

3)   School day care center looses two children and an adult to a knife attack. After all, knives are just short swords, right? So, if you are going to take away larger gun clips, but not small, then we presume you would take swords, but no knives. What did you gain?

4)   A woman laughs as she uses her car to chase down three kids at an elementary school. Alright, so now no one can own a car, right?

5)   Man attacks 11 kids and 3 teachers with a machete. See what I mean?

6)   Numerous fires started with intent to kill people in apartments, stores, offices, and schools. Starting to get the idea?

7)   The Web site lists these additional incidents (scroll to events with ‘criminal’ cited instead or ‘terrorism’) with no known tie to SSRI drugs, but are cited here because the killers had no guns:

    1. Bath Michigan man uses dynamite to kill 40 children, himself, and the School Superintendant over inability to pay school taxes causing foreclosure of his farm. So if you take all the guns, better also take all the materials used to make explosives;
    2. Poe Elementary playground attacked by man with bomb in suitcase killing himself, his son, the Principal, a custodian, two other students, and injuring 17 other children. See what I mean?
    3. 63 students and adults were burned to death by an angry student at a school dance in Goteborg, Sweden (gun control in Sweden is strict). So if you take all the guns, better take all the gasoline and matches;
    4. 67 teen students died from an arson attack on the dorm at Kyanguli Secondary School in Machakos, Kenya, injuring 19 others. See what I mean?
    5. The Elementary School of Ikeda, Japan, lost 8 students and another 13, including two teachers, were injured by a man with a kitchen knife (there is total gun control in Japan);
    6. 72 kindergarten students and teachers at Zhanjiang City, China, became dangerously ill from rat poison put in their salt by a competing school operator (there is total gun control in China). So now there can be no household poisons?
    7. That same year, 2002, two men upset with contract provisions with Number One High School in Changed, China, put rat poison in breakfast food making 195 children and teachers seriously ill. See what I mean?
    8. Two years later, Number Two High School in Ruzhou, China, suffers an attack by a man who kills 8 and injures 4 students with a knife while they sleep in three separate dormitories;
    9. And yet the next year, a man who had lost his job, again in Zhanjiang, attacks several Nansoon Middle School students with a kitchen knife, injuring 8;
    10. In Jikari High School, Yamaguchi, Japan, a student threw a homemade bomb made from nails and emptied firecrackers into a classroom, injuring 58 students and the teacher. Might as well do away with the 4th of July celebration, anyway, since you are getting rid of the Constitution and Bill of Rights;
    11. In 2010, a man killed three students, and a teacher, and injured 20 other children and staff at the kindergarten of Zibo, China, once more with a knife;
    12. Another machete attack took place in the 5th grade class of the Talisayan Elementary School, Xamboanga City, Philippines, killing one student, a teacher, and a grandfather of a student, and injuring 4 more students and two teachers (gun control in the Philippines is near total);
    13. If you wish more examples, there are thirty more at the bottom of this wikipedia link on list of rampage killers, including at least two alleged deliberate crashing of passenger jets. So let’s put TSA and the FAA out of work and ban aircraft. After all, you do want to protect people from violence, right? That really IS your motive for taking away guns, RIGHT? Sorry… I didn’t hear your answer.

 If you do not own a gun, you do not own your government

And what about when other citizens nearby ALSO have guns…

…the guns they want to take away from you and me? The news of such events that does not make endless headlines because it does little to support gun control wishes of those who seek total control over an unarmed public? A mention the day it happens is as good as it gets, as a rule. Thanks for much of this compilation by

 1)   A 1995 mass murder for drug effort was spoiled in Muskegon, MI, when the store owner, despite being shot four times in the back, managed to use his own gun to scare off druggies who had planned to kill everyone in his store;

2)   A 1997 high school shooting in Pearl, Miss., was halted by the school’s vice principal after he retrieved a pistol he kept in his truck;

3)   A 1998 school dance  for Parker Middle School (Edinboro, PA) shooting saw one teacher killed, and anther teacher and two students wounded before a man living next door forced the shooter to surrender by getting the drop on him with his shotgun;

4)   A 1999 gun shop owner with concealed pistol shot a gunman to the ground who had brought 100 rounds of ammo with him to ‘go out in a blaze of glory’ at, of all places, a shooting range in California (a guarantee he would get his wish);

5)   A 2002 shooting at Appalachian School of Law in Grundy, Va., came to an abrupt conclusion after three had been killed and three more wounded —when two students, unbeknownst one to the other, ran to their cars to retrieve firearms and confront the shooter with threat of crossfire;

6)   A 2005 shooting which started at the Smith County Courthouse in Tyler, TX, and involved high-speed pursuit, was ended because of the intervention of Mark Allen Wilson, who had a legal concealed carry weapon. This one did not end as well as the others cited, herein, as Wilson was himself killed by the shooter, who was wearing a bullet-proof vest. However, the exchange of fire allowed Police who had been kept at bay to end the matter with fatal shots of their own. This was after the shooter had already killed his ex-wife and wounded his own son, and wounded three lawmen in the melee;

7)   A 2007 gunman attempting to kill parishioners of the New Life Church in Colorado Springs was only able to kill two before being shot by an armed retired Policeman who had changed his mind about going to church that day because of a previous like attack on a church in Ogden the prior week;

8)   A 2007 mall shooter in Utah, after killing five and wounding four, was shot dead by an armed off-duty police officer;

9)   A 2008 shooting in an Israeli School (the Mercaz HaRav massacre) was ended by shots from a student and off-duty policeman using personal weapons, who entered the school with such intent after hearing shots which killed 7 teens and one teacher, and wounded ten other students;

10) A 2008 Winnemucca tavern shooting was ended after two deaths when the shooter, while reloading, was shot dead by a patron with a concealed carry permit;

11) A 2009 workplace shooting in Houston, Texas, was halted by two coworkers who carried concealed handguns;

12) A 2009 College Park party was interrupted by two gunmen who counted ten guests and then counted bullets to insure they had enough. After separating the Men and Women one of them started to rape one of the women, but was ‘coitus interruptus’ by shots from her boyfriend, who killed one and drove off the other gunman;

13) A 2009 restaurant robbery attempt by two gunmen Anniston, AL, was thwarted when one of them threatened the life of a patron who was hiding, only to be shot dead by the customer, who had also prepared his concealed pistol for possible use. A few shots were then exchanged with the second gunman, who was critically wounded;

14) That same year, a convenience store in Richmond, VA, was  robbed at gunpoint, the clerk being shot and wounded, and other patrons being shot at before the robber was shot dead by a patron with concealed carry permit.

15) A 2010  Mills, N.Y., shooting incident where the gunman, an angry customer, intended to kill six employees (he had a ‘death list’ of their names) of a cell phone store was, after opening fire on his first victim, himself shot dead by an armed off duty policeman with concealed weapon.

16) A 2012 RV park shooting incident in Early, Texas, was ended by a resident with his pistol as the gunman, after killing two people and their dogs, then held Police at bay with his scope equipped rifle;

17) A 2012 church shooting in Aurora, Colo., was stopped by a member of the congregation carrying a gun.

I leave you with two things, the first being: In Australia, where total gun control has been enacted (confiscation to establish an almost completely unarmed public), in 2011 there were STILL 94,000 shootings that took 29,000 lives… with not one civilian able to defend themselves. In America, the one spot where gun violence is rated worst, oddly enough, is the District of Columbia. Let’s compare:

There, the 2011 death rate by firearms was 12 deaths per 100,000 population, and that’s in a country where gun ownership is 89 guns per 100 adults. Compare that to Australia where it is now roughly 6 guns per 100 (est. by using UK provided figures), where deaths are 131 per 100,000.  Does that sound like gun control works as proponents claim?

To get that information in media, of course, I had to go to England, because the American press won’t tell you the truth about such things. They got their information from FBI, which any US paper or news network could just as easily have done… but actual investigative reporting would not help government take away your gun, would it?

The second is this: Out of 10,650 murders by gunmen in Virginia, only 4 were by persons who had legally registered with concealed carry permits.  Criminals don’t need or seek permits, of course. These four deaths by legitimate ‘gun toters’ would seem somewhat balanced by the fact that there are about as many instances, the most recent being the Clackamas Mall shooting… where persons with concealed weapons elected NOT to use their gun to shoot at gunmen engaged in murder because they did not feel they could safely do so without risking hitting innocent persons in the line of fire, or return fire hitting such persons behind them. That is part and parcel of good gun handling safety training, which all firearms owners should be required to have: my idea of a ‘gun control law’ that might actually work some good.

But personally, I’d rather have open carry… I’d even be moved to wear a six gun and cowboy hat if the 1875 Colt .45 hadn’t been stolen from my family some years back (when I did wear it in public on occasion). Open carry is a silent and untold deterrent to gun violence. In Cuba, there is no standing army, because every capable citizen serves in the Defense Force (like the National Guard), and is issued an AK-47, side arms (many people pack), and even grenades. Result: LOW CRIME, and very few murders by these weapons. The same is true in Switzerland (different weapons, of course), so it has nothing to do with Communism, that it works.

Statistically, in the Old Wild West where wearing a gun was the norm, gun violence was also relatively low… (e.g., the murder rate per capita in Abilene was lower than any modern US city, today). There have probably been more shooting victims in TV and movie westerns than in real life in the old West. When almost everyone has a gun, politeness rules; even when confronting someone in an unpleasant situation, it was done with carefully chosen words.

SIR, I believe that Ace up your sleeve proves you are a card cheat — and the pot is therefore mine, unless you wish to object?” Given the choice, most villains would back down unless the odds were significantly in their favor… which gun control laws will surely provide them, one 2nd Amendment-eroding law at a time.

The Clackamas Town Center Shooter… me, my family, and friends

This one came closer than I’d like to those I love… and requires we make comparisons to Aurora.

Permission to repost if in entirety with all links in tact and credit to author H. Michael Sweeney, and the original blog at
Clackamas shooting compared to aurora shooting

Reading this post you will learn:

a) How the Clackamas shooting relates to me and people I love, personally

b) How it relates to the Aurora Century 21 shooting

c) That like Aurora, there are still mysteries and questions to be resolved

When the Mall finally reopened after the Police investigation, our family all went to the Mall and expressed our moral support. They had a nice Candle light vigil, and there was a group singing Christmas Carols. A lot of people had tears in their eyes, including me. We hung a Star on the tree in Memorial for victims and their families. I wrote simply, “Hope, Love, Faith, Life.”

I also recorded a music segment and sent it as a text message to a dozen people I thought would appreciate it. It ‘spoke’ volumes about coming together as a community and going forward under duress. But as it happens, this event was a bit closer to home, and some of my tears were not just for those reasons, but because of more personal details.

As an author and consultant on privacy and security matters, as well as abuse of power issues including crimes of the New World Order, I should be used to such nastiness by now. I’ve been involved with investigations or other direct confrontations resulting in capture and prosecution a whole range of bad guys, including going head-to-head with terrorists and dirty cops, with three and perhaps five attempts on my life for my trouble. Read about it.

But no. I’m not used to it.

My wife has come home to find Men in Black fleeing our home using walkie talkies. People have tried to break into our home while we slept three nights in a row, and they did eventually gain entrance while we were away and ‘did things.’ I could spend an hour telling you about one man (a Parole Officer) who, with his coworkers and Bounty Hunter friends regular followed us… followed us to a birthing class where we observed him covertly meet with a member of the class who tried to get friendly with us… later identified as a Naval Intelligence Officer.

I was investigating the Flight 800 shoot down at the time. I could go on like that for some time, actually, with endless tales of Men in Black, FBI, CiA, Secret Service, and even one confirmed NSA and MI-5/6 spook. Even today there is the odd event, because I often cross swords with client opponents, often some of those same players. Despite all that, I’m still not used to it.

Aurora shooting compared to clackamas shooting

About Clackamas Town Center

Clackamas Town Center, a few feet from where shooter entered complex (from their site – click)

One of our twins currently works at Sears at one end of the Mall, as did her husband until recently. The other twin works at Penny’s, at the opposite end of the Mall. In the center of the Mall on one side we find the Century 21 theater and its adjacent food court where the shooting is said to have taken place. Opposing this, is Macey’s. Both my Wife and I used to work there… and my Sister-in-law subsequently works there, now.

The story goes this way: on Tuesday, Dec. 11, a young man whom I will not honor by naming, hurriedly left his car in the parking lot and rushed to the Macy’s exterior entrance, dropping at least one ammunition clip as he went. He was carrying an AR-15 .223 rifle almost identical to the one used by James Holmes, and wearing a ‘white mask.’ Once inside, he ran through the store attracting much attention and causing some due concern. About four seconds after running past my Sister-in-law at the Cosmetic’s Department, he opened fire. It was 3:27 PM, according to a cash register transaction at the same instant. Police say there were easily 10,000 people in the Mall at that moment. Shudder.

At 3:27 on the day before, I had been at the Mall, myself. I was in the food court where I struck up a conversation with the young woman who ran a cupcake kiosk at the edge of the food court closest to Macy’s interior entrance… where the shooter would be appearing the next day. Had I had that conversation on Tuesday instead of Monday, I would have observed first-hand the shooter as he skid to a halt and prepared his weapon, and opened fire:

He shot a woman in the chest and killed her, likely instantly. She was Cindy Yuille, a Mother of 54 years who looks very much like my Sister-in-law, and is about the same age. I shudder. He also shot in that same instant a 15 year-old teenage girl, Kristina Chevchenko, who suffered serious injury but is thankfully now recovering. She looks like a neighbor girl, and actually lives within a healthy walk’s distance from us. I shudder. He then turned the weapon on the cupcake lady, and fired but missed. As I could have been there, and had spoken to her the day before, I shudder.

Other shots fatally took down Steven Forsythe, age 45, and Father of two. He was one of those dynamic and widely admired and loved individuals who seemed to be involved in everything good, including being a high school football coach.  He also lived a walk away, and was a personal friend and business colleague to one of my own friends and business colleagues. I shudder.

The shooter, it is estimated, fired some 60 rounds before fleeing and, perhaps at seeing Police were closing in, took his own life. Early in the shooting, just as in Colorado, his gun jammed. By the time he could clear it, most everyone had taken shelter, many into stores where employees were herding them into secure back rooms and locking everyone behind steel grates and heavy fire doors. Kudos, Clackamas TC!

Had their quick thinking and selflessness not been so…  had the gun not jammed… had the shooter been better prepared or not been wearing a mask to partially restrict his view…  had some people been confused by the echoes and run toward the shooter instead of away… I shudder.

Now, please allow me to change directions for making a couple of points. It was not that many weeks ago that one of my most popular blogs was on the Aurora shooting. I wrote it to raise 25 questions no one has asked, any one of which point to James Holmes as a patsy in a false flag terror event. I also revealed specific potential motives for outside parties to be responsible, with proofs of viability.

Aurora and Clackamas shootings compared.

Clackamas and Aurora Have Troubling Similarities

a) both alleged shooters were young troubled men with psychiatric problems (which we now hear again in the even more tragic shooting of 27 in Connecticut). This is a very tired refrain heard time and again in mass shootings, and there are reasons for concern associated with CIA’s MK Ultra and related mind control experiments;

b) both wore all black. One wore a gas mask and, sans mask, was ‘made up’ to more or less look like ‘The Joker,’ while in Clackamas, it was merely a ‘white mask.’ But there is a problem there, too: conflicting reports describe it as three distinctly different kinds of masks, and for some troubling reason, Police decline to confirm WHICH ~ a Michael Meyer’s Halloween Mask; a Jason’s style Hockey player’s mask; or a Guy Fawkes (We are Anonymous… expect us!) mask;

c) both used the same weapon, and AR-15 .223 variant. The weapon jammed and prevented more carnage;

d) both fled to no avail, which begs the question, why bother? Holmes just sat in his car and waited to be captured without resistance, while in Clackamas, the shooter took his own life. Police found him dead, sans reports of hearing or seeing him shoot himself, but why? Why wear a mask, and why run if you were going to kill yourself?

e) both incidents suffered conflicting reports as to the number of shooters seen and their whereabouts at any given point in time, implying a possible coordinated assault. In Aurora, there is considerable evidence this is so, but in Clackamas, at least thus far, we might presume it to be normal confusion causing misconception and mistaken accounts.

f) both took place in or at the virtual doorstep of a Century 21 theater. On first reports on Clackamas, I was very concerned about this particular coincidence, but am less certain it matters, now ~ because the actual shooting began in the area central to the mall at the edge of the food court, and the shooter entered from the opposite side of the complex from the theater. Had he intended to target Century 21, there was an entrance right there.

g) both enjoyed remarkably prompt Police response. In Clackamas, the shooter was not very bright. The Mall is located about one block away from the Sheriff’s Office, which also has a secondary presence right on the Mall lot with about a half dozen cars. In Aurora, the nearest facility was several miles distant and quite away from common arterials.

h) in both, Police were not terribly forthcoming with facts early on (SOP). However, mistakes made by Aurora Police in their public statements (see my post) were not present in Clackamas.

Still, with all these coincidences, I shudder. Doubly so because of the horror in Connecticut, a murderous rampage of which I cannot bring myself to write… except to say that I shudder to consider that three such shootings… four if you count the Sheik Temple shooting in Michigan… all within a window of a few weeks of the same Season… and all on the heels of a United Nations Treaty attempt to ban all firearms in civilian ownership.

Clackamas is a community of people with whom I share a happy existence in a beautiful and generally peaceful setting. Good people. So I shudder at the closeness and ‘what if’ nature of the Mall shooting as it indeed came all-too close to impacting my own family in even more personal and tragic ways. We were lucky. Others families and friends were not.

But I shudder also because all the communities where these shootings took place are like that… and in a country where government seems to be preparing itself for war with its own citizens and, in local preparation, would find any such effort a lot easier if there was some way they could ban all weapons and collect them, first. It is for my me and my family that I shudder, yes. But also, for my country and a thing called the Constitution.

Many people died when those shootings took place. But I fear the Second Ammendment may also be a casualty given the explosion of talk about gun bans as result, especially because of Connecticut… and in thinking it possible…

I do indeed shudder!

25 Questions No One Has Asked About the Aurora Shooting (pt 3)

There are always little things that go wrong in a crime…  James Holmes compared to JFK things that betray the lies with a screaming truth

Updaate May 14, 2012: Yesterday, I posted an update of significant importance regarding discovery that a key witness, Eric Hunter, had either lied or was majorly confused about key details, and appears to have a significant motive for lying. Further, his interview appears to involve network falsehoods and cover up actions. This was not the first update to the post, but it was the most important due the shocking nature of implications.
Apologies, but there were a series of problems encountered attempting to offer that update. People deserve accuracy and want to be comfortable with reasons for changes, so I try to be explicit in detailing reasons and leave older information in tact, as well. However, attempts at perfecting the complex edit (it impacted many areas of analysis) resulted in undetected wordpress malfunctions or incorrect operation by myself. Whatever the problem, it got worse in attempting to rectify with a new edit, and appears to have caused at least 25 or so readers to visit expecting to find the update, but finding a much older version which pre dates all updates.
There is some possibility this was due to a hack. I simply cannot tell, but the other clue is that the last several edits in the revision history at wordpress are a jumbled mess and unusable. So here am I now posting a single reconstructed edit attempting to rectify all ills and show the impact of Hunter’s folly, reflected in red text, but based on salvaging material from multiple revision history versions. This will not likely be a precise match to any of the updated versions, but will be a better, easier to read version as it will reflect only one update. I’ve also elected to use brown text to reflect material no longer valid as result of Hunter. I apologize for any inconvenience or confusion this may have caused.
Our review continues from PARTs I and II, by H. Michael Sweeney, Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved. No reproduction permissions will be granted for the first 90 days. Links only, please.
In review: This in-depth series of posts will reveal startling new investigative issues for the first time, anywhere. The detail required to make concise arguments on a long list of critical elements forces it to be offered in installments. In fulness, you will discover:
  • Three motives for making James Holmes a Patsy with Fascism as benefactor, and two possible motives for targeting Century Theaters
  • Easy link access to the key-most videos and images for each critical point of evidence presented in a logical, easy to follow order.
  • Reasoning there were at least three additional helpers involved in a professional black operation backed up by even more supporting players
  • Introduction of an actual political REASON for targeting The Dark Knight Rises (TDKR), a reason which fits one of the proposed motives
  • 25 key questions missed by almost everyone, the answer to any one of which could easily provide reasonable doubt that it was a lone gunman event
  • A walk-through narrative portraying an alternate scenario which fits all  conflicting facts into a workable reality.

 James Holmes was a patsy Part Three

James Holmes was a patsy

Was aurora shooting a CIA or DOD job?

If you missed part two, click here, or start with part one

QUESTION 16: How did CBS News know about ‘buckets of ammunition’ in James’ apartment before anyone could look into the apartment? Review the timeline found at Huffington Post (a good timeline to review because it shows also how the story unfolded on the Web and television, which can be useful in answering some questions regarding confusing or conflicting information, and yet raises new questions, as well). There we find CBS reports confirmation at 9:01 AM that morning (Friday, the 20th) that the apartment is booby trapped. They clearly describe it as happening at the present time, and that it will take some time to gain access; the Bomb Squad will have to clear the apartment before investigation can begin.

But wait. The timeline also says CBS News’ Bob Orr reported in tweets three hours earlier (6:07 AM) stating that‘Buckets of ammunition’ were found in the shooter’s apartment.

The timeline further states that the apartment was not cleared by the Bomb Squad until 1:58 PM the FOLLOWING DAY. Channel nine’s Jace Larson tweets with photos the first fire trucks as arriving at 4:42 AM that following day, and we know from video of that day that that’s when Police were able to inspect the apartment using a Ladder truck, also used to break out the window for robots to be inserted. How did CBS learn about buckets of ammunition, and what was their source? The timeline is either missing some key details, or this illustrates some Wag-the-Dog effort undertaken with an error in timing or flawed execution, or worse — prior knowledge.

QUESTION 17: Why did the shooter try to get into theater 10 after leaving 9?

Update :  Thanks to an alert reader with first-hand knowledge, (see reader comments at page bottom), we now know the witness, Eric Hunter, lied (Caveat in order, further down in the chain of update material); the two theaters do not share a common hallway. Here is my original text based on his statements to media, and media accounts based on his remarks.

EXITs in theaters 9 and 10 share the same hallway to the outside. Witness Eric Hunter in an interview on ABC news talks about trying to exit 10 via the EXIT where he sees two girls with wounds followed by the shooter in the exit hallway adjoining with theater 9. Eric helps the girls into theater 10 and holds the door shut as the shooter pounds on it attempting to gain access. Since his gun had jammed and he had switched to and used his pistols, why would the shooter bother?  I’m also wondering how and why two girls would risk running toward and past the shooter to use the EXIT in the first place?

Update continued:  That there is no common hallway can be illustrated to the reader’s satisfaction by review of two different kinds of facility plans for the theater, here, and here, one of them showing the actual emergency exit paths as required by law. Moreover, I’ve uncovered several motives to presume him lying, including implications of media complicity and cover up (ABC News):

a)  In an official ABC follow up interview, Eric states that bullets were coming through the wall in 10, which no other witness so states, and as we have questioned, based on where the Shooter was standing when shooting, in order to shoot into 10 he would have had to turn the gun to a wall immediately to his left, with no one present to shoot at, there. He had already fired a shot into the air which caused people to flee to the aisles. He need only open fire in one direction to hit anyone who might have originally been seated anywhere near the wall shared with 10. He subsequently did turn his gun at an angle toward theater 8 to shoot at people in the  far exit row, and some rounds did go through that wall, but there was no logical reason for rounds to penetrate 10.

b) In that same interview, he stated he saw blood on the carpet as he descended the steps (so he is saying he was in the balcony). How, in a darkened theater, where the carpets are already red, and illuminated dimly, could he tell a fluid on the carpet was blood as opposed to, say, soda pop or water? All would look darker than the carpet? No one was reported injured in 10, either.

c) Also in the same interview, ABC calls Hunter a ‘hero,’ for saving two girls lives and essentially confronting the Shooter when, in point of fact, we now know he is lying (caveat to follow). Turns out Hunter is running for a political post as Councilman, and further bills himself as a rapper and actor on his Facebook page. Being a hero couldn’t hurt any of those aspirations. This speaks to motive. Learn about this in this very interesting video.

d) That same video seems to offer compelling evidence that Hunter’s interview was not shot when and where claimed, or as it appeared. Based on Hunter’s own Facebook pages, again, a self-shot picture of himself in what sure looks like a very large TV studio with blue screen wall behind him. He has exactly the same shirt and necklace, and day’s beard growth in both that snap and the interview. Blue screens and green screens are used to mat people into video backgrounds not actually present. Green is more common than blue, which pre dates green.

e) The original interview, as alluded to in the ABC follow up interview, is no longer available. ABC for some reason, though they never have before for any other story or even other Aurora related YouTubes, ordered YouTube to pull multiple copies of that interview (only), even terminating the account of the poster. That link (here again for your convenience) so indicates. This is rather odd given that use of news footage for YouTube commentaries falls under legal Fair Use. What was on the first video that further conflicts with the second? Or is there some material fact revealed which is far more serious than a lying politician?  End of update, this section, more below.

QUESTION 18: Why was James so calm when arrested… even to appear drugged at his first court appearance? People thought him a zombie with no understanding of reality. Some accounts say he repeatedly asked “Why am I here?” and he was clearly not paying much attention and even seemed to fall asleep briefly at one point. The answer offered by Dianne Sawyer on ABC news would seem a feeble attempt to explain, stating that James told Police he was so calm because he had taken Vicodin. But the effectiveness of this drug is stated to last only 4-8 hrs. for most users, and does NOT cause a drugged stupor in normal doses. Medical advice states that most a given person could take would be six, but it cause them to vomit everything up, or they would die. So this can in no way explain his stupor at his arraignment or his confusion in jail. Where did Sawyer get her facts?

QUESTION 19: Why did James mail specific plans for his assault to his Psychiatrist at the University such that it arrived well before the day of the event? Fox News reports it as mailed July 12. That would mean it arrived several days before the shooting.  To do so risks the operation being uncovered and thwarted. It would have been more logical to drop it in the mail on the way to the theater. Are we to believe James planned the operation for months with exacting detail in every other matter but this one?

QUESTION 20: Why did the Psychiatrist to whom James mailed the notebook initiate a call about a suspicious package which was NOT the packages sent by James, and which therefore resulted in them finding James’ package? Fox News says the first package was slipped under the Doctor’s door and she did not recognize the name on the package, and so called Police. If you choose to buy that as sufficient reason, fine… but then why did Police subsequently decide to then sweep the entire mailroom and find the actual package sent by James? Alex Jones has intimated (and I concur) that it seems as if such a package was expected as part of a conspiratorial plot to make a nice and tidy case, but once it had gone missing, steps were taken to insure it was recovered.

QUESTION 21: Why was everyone in James Holmes Life involved in government projects and agencies associated with Political Control Technology, or the keymost elements, thereof, Psychiatry and the military? That term (PCT) is the polite description for mind control. Take a look. James’ Father, Dr. Robert Holmes, previously worked for HNC Software, a firm contracting to DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Project Agency) to develop ‘cortronic neural networks’ for interfacing with the human brain. His Grandfather was Lt. Col. Robert Holmes, who based on his military history, was likely involved in military intelligence, who are client to PCT science. His Mother is a psychologist.

James himself was a recipient of a Grant through NIH (National Institute of Health) Neuroscience at the Universtity of Colorado’s Anschutz Center, formerly the U.S. Army’s Fitzsimons Medical Center, where military research of this sort was undertaken. Previously, James was a research assistant with the Salk Institute at the University of California, which in turn was partnering with DARPA to help develop ‘Peak Soldier Performance’ through chemical enhancements impacting the brain and physiology. The project there also included brain-machine interfaces quite related to the type of work at HNC where James’ Father worked.

At the school, James was seeing a psychiatrist, Dr. Lynne Fenton, who worked at the school. SHE is the one who called Police regarding the non dangerous package mentioned above. She is an ex-USAF Doctor who holds both a Medical (MD) and Psychiatric degree. She had also warned the school in writing that she felt James was a threat to others, but no action resulted. A psychiatrist is obligated under doctor-patient relationships not to divulge information about clients unless a danger to themselves, or others, but in such cases, they are to contact authorities (State Mental Health). I know of no reason they would be allowed to tell an employer, instead — unless to deliberately bolster a cover story.

This was to be a breaking point to the Fourth Part, but it will instead be a three part article… so here is the rest of it:

James Holmes set up by Men in Black 

And if you dig deeply enough into a conspiracy…  James Holmes compared to JFK assassination you might just find a Clay Shaw


 James Holmes was a patsy Part Four (final)

James Holmes was a patsy

Was aurora shooting a CIA or DOD job?

QUESTION 22: Why and how was a child killed behind the theater and not discussed by Police? The press talks about a six year old girl killed in the theater, and we have a 13 year-old girl who tried to save her, but couldn’t. This is clearly not the same child. Warning: This material is graphic and unsettling.

You can hear Police finding the girl on the dispatch audio (at 6:00 in). There is chilling evidence of it all at the rear of the theater with the second gun and gas mask (photo); the shoes and the blood, but there is no chalk outline. The audio implies the victim may be alive at this time (we can hope), but the blood loss is phenomenal for a child, and such a wound would be fatal in moments.  A pair of child’s sandals, the color common for little girls lays with the gun right at the Exit, and a trail of blood with splatter patterns suggesting a major wound to arteries… runs between doorway area and almost all the way to the gas mask. A lone, crazed gunman out of ammunition would care nothing about anyone exiting the theater behind him. But the visual evidence tells a different story: the shooter appears to have dropped his gun, grabbed a little girl, who in struggling lost her shoes, and broke free. The rest is not a pretty picture, but it can only be told as deductive conjecture:

Photo analysis suggests she ran down the sidewalk chased by the killer, who was seen and reported by Police as a ‘man in a gas mask.’ They do not mention seeing the girl, perhaps because their view was blocked by vehicles in the parking lot. But the shooter must have pulled his gas mask off to see better near the corner of the building, and dropped it, probably to make easier recapture of the girl. He could not kill her there, as it would raise questions, so once corralled, he carried her back toward the doorway where Police found her near the exit door by James’ car. We have audio of that find in Police Dispatch recordings. Recall the gun was left behind, testimony it was indeed out of ammunition. Still struggling with the girl as he went, he had to drop the gas mask along the way to retrieve a knife, which he used. You can see the blood splatters which give testimony. It is these which we must analyze…

Trail of dried blood. See text for analysis of splatters, but not if you just had a meal

I am not a forensics specialist in blood splatters, but I have done photo analysis of varying technical natures in both the military and in civilian employ. Yet the splatters do quite easily suggest some things which seem rather obvious to me: While we can hope it merely a serious wound in the foot area, or that blood streamed down her leg to her feet, my take is that he cut her throat and let her hang in his arms before him as he went, with her head down. At every pace, but without any differences suggesting left-right foot pattern, are the tell-tale blood splatters of two spurts of blood giving testimony to her last remaining terror-filled heart beats.

Each splatter appears almost equal to a spilled top half of a cup of coffee in volume, and there are 18 groupings ending in some larger pools — estimated equal to about 4 pints of blood. An adult only has 10-12 pints max and usually dies if they loose 3-4 pints. These groupings appear as if interrupted in distance by steps of the killer, which would have caused the body to swing toward the next splatter location. They are so well defined that it appears her head was rather close to the ground. The blood spurts toward the door and away from the gas mask, so her body was facing the door and being carried in that direction as she died. They don’t quite make it all the way back to the door before they diminish, suggesting loss of blood pressure. Even if we prefer to think her actually running with a foot wound or blood trailing down her legs, she was starting to black out. Tragic and disgusting, either way.

Also, some Web posts include images of the dropped gas mask where the person posting claims it to show a discarded knife. I do not find them clearly revealing of that fact (blurry), but only suggestive of it. But to chase, kill, and return a body to a doorway is hallmark of a professional who did not want a witness. Why would James even have cared, if all he was going to do was sit and wait for capture? And given his state of stupor and explanation for calmness, how could he even run in the first place?

On the other hand, if James were NOT the shooter, and merely a patsy, anyone exiting the rear of the theater could not be allowed to give testimony to what they would see: a person who was NOT James exiting via a vehicle which was NOT James’ car, and possibly additional helpers such as a driver or clean up man. THAT is why it was important that someone insure no one used the exits in theaters 8 and 10, and why a little girl had to die. Yet thus far, there is no mention of such a little girl beyond the first discovery by an officer. Why? Why no second girl listed in the injured and dead, not even a Jand Doe? How is it that no parent has come forward to ask, unless the answer be that the parent is among the dead? Was there blood on James’ clothing, and if not, why not?

QUESTION 23: Why did the Police Chief repeatedly dodge questions about security cameras capturing the event, and what do they show? Three times he ignored the question. In point of fact several cameras had a view of the rear of the theater (see photos) and should be able to concretely show the true events. Why no acknowledgement of their existence, much less their content?

QUESTION 24: How did media come to interview Steven Foster, and why did he say what he said? Foster is described in various accounts as ‘an international security expert and former Aurora Police officer.’ Actually, he’s a business man spread too thin among a lot of organizations if you read his bio. And, his security background is… like James’ psychiatrist’s background… from the USAF. Foster has tons of credentials, easily as many as any CIA front man I’ve ever encountered. His security expertise is actually in the area of risk management, and leans to the software side of data security… for customers like the Defense Department. I’m hoping that’s all coincidence, and its not all that unusual. But I’m intrigued that his main Denver business is located only seven miles away from the theater, and like all the locations of interest in the shooting, is just a couple of blocks off a main road which leads directly to the theater. It also enjoys easy access to the theater shooting exercise and is even a bit closer. And there’s more to talk about along that line, but not just yet.

Yes, he worked for the Aurora Police Dept. at one time… briefly. The fellow is quite young for all he’s accomplished, his career suggesting a grooming process. He holds key jobs in a variety of firms across multiple states, just like I find in CIA fronts, but on a slightly smaller scale. So I found myself wondering what prompted media to pick up the phone and hunt him down for this interview.

Well, turns out he’s a paid professional standby media interviewee, just the sort of person that make wag-the-dog a viable mechanism. He’s also a paid professional witness in courtroom proceedings. I’m familiar with such persons. I call them ‘professional spoilers and spinners.’ They are a kind of Agenda Insurance mechanism called in to ‘fix things’. Of course, they could actually speak their true mind if they wanted to, and we might not even be able to tell the difference.

But I’m equally curious about what he said, which certainly fits the role of a spoiler. “I think he came here specifically to disengage, and I think the preparation became the assault at the theater. He had to disconnect in Colorado. There would be too many ways he would be seen or caught. It speaks of his personality and the level of preparation around this. His rationale behind his actions point to someone who wants to be admired or worshiped or revered for being a maniacal maniac.”

Excuse me? Nowhere in any of his background do we see any signs of his expertise in psychology. No Policeman… no security expert… no software peddler… no Board member of any corporation… should normally be considered as such. Yet he renders this wonderfully condemning picture of a mentally ill killer describing his innermost thought processes as if privy to personal interviews or reviews of details for which he could not possibly have knowledge. And media spins it as if authoritative?

Let’s shift focus to what was said, and the contradictions inherent. “I think he came here specifically to disengage…” And to think everyone else thought he came her to go to school. “and I think the preparation became the assault at the theater.” Uh… ‘preparation?’ Preparing to disengage? “He had to disconnect in Colorado. There would be too many ways he would be seen or caught. It speaks of his personality and the level of preparation around this.”

He’s trying to say James was distant to everyone so he could undertake his planning without being caught (which again begs the question, why send those plans to someone before the attack). He then goes on to say, “His rationale behind his actions point to someone who wants to be admired or worshiped or revered for being a maniacal maniac.” Excuse me, but this is psychobabble calculated to paint a picture in the mind of John Q. Public, who never questions talking head sound bites, but simply absorbs their tone and select key words. But I question them: He wants to be admired and worshiped? How does that fit with orange hair which he didn’t even bother to reveal at the theater? Should not he have revealed the hair early in the event, right in the theater, to make himself more famous and worthy of worship?

QUESTION 25: Why was Century Theaters targeted? Assume for a moment that political agenda was afoot by the NWO crowd for any of the three cited motives. If so, they could target any theater chain they wanted. One reason to target a given company over another is any loyalty to the NWO by those in ownership. And just to be clear — that’s not the same as saying they themselves were involved, but neither is involvement precluded from consideration. I illustrate the notion by asking you what company’s trucks are ALWAYS used by terrorists to blow stuff up? I’m sure you instantly said Ryder, and you would be correct. How is such a great ‘coincidence’ possible, when in some cases, competitor rental locations were much closer at hand?

Early on, I asked why, and I think I found the answer. Of all the big national rental agencies (in the industry, they prefer to be called Logistics firms), Ryder is the only one where the principle management are NOT part and parcel of the greater Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Media complex. For each of the other firms, however, key officers and Board members tend to have lots of ties to the military and military contractors, several to the intelligence community, and some to media. Nada for Ryder, at least the last time I checked (OKC Bombing — for which, by the way, my investigative findings resulted in startling revelations missed by everyone else).

So let’s look at Century Theaters and the two others making up the top three ranking chains in America (Century is number three). Century is a bit unique in that its management and theater ownership seems to be made up of a collective of smaller independent chains linking together: rebels against the big corporate firms who set out to be big by running independents out of business with overly competitive pricing and then buying them out for a song. That’s probably an exaggeration, at least some of the time, but it seems close to the mark. Their management is quite similar to that of Ryder: squeaky clean, and no ties to the greater motion picture industry. Moreover, management wise, they are doing a much better job than their competitors, making huge gains in profits this last year, while the others struggled to remain flush.

Number one in America is the Regal group. I find one officer of Regal came directly from a firm serving the Defense industry and the Federal Government; another is tied to MGM as a power player (TDKR was Warner Bros., a competitor to MGM); one comes from FEMA and is a member of a Federal Reserve Bank; one comes from the oil industry going back to Rockefeller oil interests in Pennsylvania, and that firm happens to use the same unique Web Site engine and design layout as Regal, so there is some key relationship in management which is not otherwise visible or stated. What is true, is that botfirms share some of the same major shareholders, but not large enough shares to account for like Web site constructs.

The most interesting and questionable point is that the largest shareholder (38%) in Regal is the Anschutz Investment company. Very interesting, given that the school James was attending was built with Anschutz money, and is thus named, the Anschutz Center. And, if you haven’t guessed it… they are also conveniently located about nine miles away, and three blocks off the same main street (East Colfax) where the Anshutz Center is located, and you know how close that is to the other key locations. Starts to get interesting, does it not?

Who is Anschutz, really? A few folks you’ve heard of… like Qwest (Century Link), U.S. West, Southern Pacific Railway (since acquired by Union Pacific), and other subsidiaries, and some major league sports teams (Kings, Lakers). Anschutz is VERY into media beyond just Regal Theataers, with many divisions in everything from publishing to film making (Chronicles of Narnia was theirs, among others). They also happen to run the corporate side of things (concessionaires) in National Parks (Yellowstone, Grand Canyon, Zion, Crater Lake, Death Valley, Mt. Rushmore, and many more).

But its their managers we should look too as a judge of their nature (the same people are involved in the Foundation and the Corporation, by and large, though they take care to draw distinct lines between them as separate entities and purposes). Only one is of any concern to us, here, and he comes from Enron (CIA front that bilked America) and Bankers Trust (there was that other financial bilking thing), though he not associated with BT in the recent debacle, and not everyone at ENRON knew it was CIA or knew what was going on, or they would have stopped it, right? Besides, BT gave the TARP money back, as it was less than $20 million, and hardly enough to cover executive bonuses. While these things greatly pique my interest, I would be remiss if I did not caution against drawing a negative conclusion with respect to indicating any association with the shooting.

Number two in America is number one in the World, AMC. Their ownership is, well, the Red Chinese Army. That’s right. Bought by China, lock, stock, and barrel. I don’t suppose they would have any motive for wanting to see Americans loose the right to be armed, do you? The purchase did not take place until May of this year, however, and that’s hardly enough time for an intelligence operation to be established, researched, planned, prepared for, and execute anything this fiendish… but that’s also conjecture, and presumes such a contingency operation was not started well before acquisition. In looking at the actual management in place, even after the takeover, they look pretty squeaky clean, too.

What does anschutz have to do with the aurora shooting?

Summary of problems

Too many witness accounts have too many people doing things which reveal more than a single gunman theory can match. Too many facts simply contradict logic and each other. Too many points of evidence scream multiple participants: two guns, two masks, someone had to open the outer door, someone had to hold shut the outer door, someone went into each theater to warn, someone discharged flash bang in the Lobby, and more. Someone had to know there was a simultaneous exercise, and it wasn’t some College kid. If you look at it in terms of Modus Operandi using the JFK assassination as a reference point, it is a classic intel cookie-cutter conspiracy, and looks this way:

Anschutz • The Lobby is our Grassy Knoll, where participants that we are told don’t exist were seen.
Anschutz Medical Center
Anschutz • The inner EXIT door is the Schoolbook Depository where we are expected to focus our attention, when the real zinger is elsewhere (the outer exit door).
Anschutz Investment 
Anschutz • Seegar is Reporter Bob Jackson, the only person who claimed to see a rifle in the Schoolbook Depository window, who pointed,
anschutz x and led us all on the  merry media chase which followed, and which pointed to a lone gunman..
Anschutz Corporation
Anschutz • The little girl is Officer Tibbet who had to die as an unexpected material witness, an unwanted complication to plans.
Anschutz Medical Center
Anschutz • The Car is The Texas Theater where the ‘lone gunman’ was magically found and taken easily.
Anschutz Investment 
Anschutz • The gas mask is the Magic Bullet for which we will hear all manner of creative explanations.
Anschutz Corporation
Anschutz  • The Psychiatrist is Jack Ruby (though a real assassination of Holmes by someone else may yet need transpire if the case starts to unravel).
Anschutz  She shoots Holmes with a call to Police forcing discovery of ‘lone gunman plans,’ just in case Police or media were not to believe he acted alone.
Anshcutz Medical Center
Anschutz  • The man who opened the EXIT door is our Oswald double in front of the Soviet Embassy in Mexico.
Anschutz Investment 
Anschutz  • The Apartment is Guy Banister’s Office where staging, operatives, and key elements were centralized.
Anschutz Corporation
Anschutz • The Bombs in his apartment are much like the Cubans in exile who traversed Banister’s office waiting to explode in war with Cuba.
Anschutz Medical Center
Anschutz • The security cameras are the Zapruder film, which the public didn’t get to see until more than a decade later.
Anschutz Investment 
Anschutz • James’ parents fit the puzzle in a way that Oswald’s Russian wife served, which was to hint at background covert matters. In Oswald’s case,
Anschutz • it helped define him as assassin. In James’ case, it may better define him as convenient patsy.
Anschutz Corporation
Anschutz • James’ participation and background in matters related to Political Control technology mirror Oswald’s work in top secret military radar programs.
Anschutz Medical Center
Anschutz • Judge Sylvester is the Warren Commission, sealing evidence and documents from public access.
Anschutz Investment 
Anschutz • People like me, Jon Rappaport, and other Web-based investigators are subbing for Jim Garrison, looking at the official reports incredulously,
Anschutz • and seeking to get at the truth. We will be doomed, of course, and merely labeled as ‘conspiracy theorist’ so they won’t need address the issues.
Anschutz • They even did that to Jim Garrison, after all
Anschutz Corporation
Anschutz • Anschutz (the Center, Investment company, or Foundation) is the New Orleans World Trade Mart where we may at some point find our Clay Shaw,
Anschutz • who may turn out in the end to be James’ psychiatrist, or even Mr. Foster. In fact, perhaps, we have our Man. One of Foster’s business addresses, recall,
Anschutz • enjoys easy access to the theater, and is even closer with like access to the shooting exercise site. Another business address he maintains is
Anschutz  only three blocks away from Anschutz corporate address in Denver, and in Guy Bannister’s dual-address fashion, yet another is right
Anschutz • around the corner. One of the organizations he cites in his credentials seems to have no presence on the Web or discernible address of any kind,
Anschutz • and yet another which does have Web presence cites no address… but seems to hold its meetings at… the Anschutz campus facility. So, once more,
Anschutz • why did Steven get to say what he said? In my book set Fatal Rebirth, I point out several traits of a CIA front. Clustering and multiple business names,
Anschutz • and address problems are among the many traits. Perhaps I should do more research on Anschutz and Foster. But for now, they are merely enigmas.
Anschutz Medical Center
Anschutz • What we really need right now is our Fletcher Prouty, an insider willing to come forward. I’m right here… waiting.
Anschutz Corporation

There is even a similarity to Oswald’s encounter with Police in the break room after the shooting: The police dispatch tape frequently makes reference to employees being found in the break room at the theater, though I doubt they were involved other than being employees, unlike Oswald. Everything is in place except the three hobos from the train yard. They were probably there but simply not noticed. If you listen to the full audio of the Police radio from Aurora, you get hints there may have been such persons of interest, but unlike Dallas, there was no follow on events which recorded details for posterity. In Dallas, a daytime event, people managed to get their picture.

Comparing James Holmes to JFK Assassination

An Alternate Scenario

All these contradictions can be easily reassembled to make sense without contradiction. And so I will, in chronological order, with hope that James’ defense attorney and family can make use of the information for their own investigative efforts:

This kind of operation would require long-term planning and early-stage steps to insure all elements were in place well before the actual shooting could unfold. Key among them would be putting wheels in motion for the staged theater shooting exercise. Such a project would need to be allowed to develop on its own, and the rest of the operation would need to be tuned to its dictates in loction and date… and someone on the inside would need to be part of the conspiracy, especially to control key details and to gain access to appropriate documentation such as badges, radio frequencies, names of participants, etc..

That, in turn, dictated the need to get James to move to Colorado and take up his position at Anschutz Center, and likely, his apartment close to the theater. If you think about it, arranging the close proximity of the theater, the apartment, the Center, and the location for the parallel ‘theater shooting exercise,’ suggests planning well ahead of anything alleged undertaken by James, especially the later, and one other related location yet to be discussed — by anyone. Such a tight grouping of key related locations does not happen coincidentally. So let’s presume all that done, and weapons and material ordered and delivered, and all such support material is in place. Here are the events which could better explain the conflicting facts.

Comparing James Holmes to JFK Assassination

1) The night before the shooting, James is acquired by one or more Operatives under a ruse or by hypnotic command, or after being sedated. He is taken to a safe house or motel, or may have been directed to go there directly to ‘meet’ someone, that he could be acquired. As result, he, his car, and his apartment are under control of operatives. Work on preparing the apartment booby traps and staging evidence there and in his car can begin at any time. It would be unwise to have multiple persons at James’ home for possible witnessing.

2a) Early in the day well before the theater opens, Jame’s car is driven by Operative A to the theater and parked at the key-most location early enough to insure no one else takes the spot. Two additional cars driven by Operative B and C tag along. One of these parks next to James’ car, nose pointed out, also to protect the spot for subsequent need. The other car provides a ride back for all of them.

2b) The early stages of the nearby staged theater shooting exercise also begin their cover operation for the day, most participants unaware of what is really to happen. All Operatives have suitable ID to illustrate participation in that operation should their cover be blown prematurely. They likely also carry Police Detective ID for any issues arising after the event.

3a) Late that night, tickets already in hand, Operatives A and B enter the theater complex well before show time for TDKR. Likely, this is just before the film in theater 10 is about to end. But while A buys popcorn and a drink and then takes a seat in 9, and waits, B goes directly to theater 10 just as or before the film ends to assure he will find himself alone once patrons exit. When so assured, he immediately takes the EXIT door in theater 10 and waits in the adjoining hallway. Update: we now know there was no adjoining hallway. Therefore, B would have instead have entered 9 early, not 10, and used the exit to arrange for the outer door to be opened for the shooter. THIS IS A CRITICAL POINT: SOMEONE HAD TO OPEN THAT OUTER DOOR FROM THE INSIDE.

3b) The Shooter, already dressed for the role except for headwear, drives a van (Perhaps marked as Police or Security) to the rear of the theater. You may prefer to presume the shooter dressed in the hallway once inside the rear of the theater. That is what the delay in time between the inner EXIT being opened and the Shooter’s appearance was likely intended to make you think. Operative C and James, in sedation or hypnotic control, is with him. He is dressed in identical shooter already preprepared with gunshot residue. His fingerprints are already placed on all the weapons. There may be required yet one other person, either an Operative or James’ Controller, perhaps a mind control psychiatrist. It depends only upon the nature of James’ mind and level of true cognizance.

4a) The van stops in front of James’ car leaving clearance for the second parked car, and the side door opens. Operative C exits and he drives the second car away to the nearest empty space while the Van backs into the now vacant spot.

4b) Operative C, leaves the parked secondary car and makes for the outside fire door while placing a call to Operative B waiting in the hallway. B opens the outer fire door for D, and it is rigged to allow reentry as needed.

4c) James’ is facilitated into his car with one or two Operatives standing watch to warn if anyone approaches, to avoid any awkward appearances which might warrant suspicion. For the purpose, Operative C or the Controller are likely in Police uniform for quick relief of more serious eventualities. This step is allowed a lot of time so that blocks of moments can be chosen for best chance at avoiding unwanted observers.

5a) By now, Seegar and her companion are somewhere in theater 9. But as her story does not fit other accounts, I suspect they were not seated where they claimed, and embellished story details for the sake of getting TV interviews. Or, they may have been Operatives A and B (in proper black overcoat, Seegar’s Sihlouett may have passed for a man’s), or they may indeed be paid actors. For our purposes, here, it matters not.

5b) At the same time or a similar point of progress, the Shooter enters the hallway with a bag containing weapons and head gear. If you favor the notion, the bag or bags could contain his assault clothing so that he could get dressed in the hallway. Add a second shooter here, as well, if you favor that option. Operative B will be with him/them, to help. At some point in the process he calls Operative A, who comes forward and opens the door so that Shooter can render it easy to open from the other side. A returns to the Lobby to wait. Shooter prepares and checks the weapons, and dons the headgear. B takes the empty bag to the van and then circles the building to enter Lobby, where he waits with A.

6) Everyone is in position and holds their places to a set timing mark for their next steps. A and B are in the Lobby. Shooter is in the hallway. Operative C and others are in the parking lot. C braces the outer exit door against any possible use by victims. Another operative may have braced the exit shared by theater 7 and 8, if you wish to so believe. (update: we now know no theaters shared exits, but other operatives may have blocked or at least had men positioned at each exit of adjacent theaters on both sides.) Blocking alone is not the first line of defenses against witnesses, but a failsafe should warnings not to use the exits be ignored. A precise accuracy of sequence is not possible given the level of access to witness statements afforded by the Web, which, being news interviews, generally fail to include references and details useful for the purpose. Regardless…

7a) Shooter enters and throws his smoke grenade. We might presume some one else used a cloth, hat, or glove to pick up the hot grenade and throw it back, or it may be that Operative A or B entered the theater and threw a second Grenade, and then retreated back into the Lobby. Operative C blocks the outer exit door against the ability to be opened from the inside.

7b) Shooter then fires a shot into the air, and opens fire on the persons close enough to him that they might be able to interfere if finding the courage or opportunity. Rendering them a zero threat, he turns his attention to the crowd, who has by now had time to make their way into the aisles, providing two target rich kill zones. Since the farthest Aisle is largely protected by the balcony stair/wall, he shoots there, first. Some rounds penetrate the walls into theater 8. He then turns his attention to the Aisle he stands in, for which he has a clear line of fire all the way to the entrance. Once shooting has begun, second shooter might be able to enter unnoticed, but I do not think it possible not to be seen for the whole time. One of these efforts kills the parent(s) or guardian(s) of Jane Doe, a little girl of unknown identity.

7c) Operatives A and B discharge flash-bang and smoke grenades in the Lobby area to deter Police entry and usefulness from that approach. They then enter theaters 8 and 10 respectively to give warnings against using the EXIT doors to the parking lot as that would create unwanted witnesses.

7d) Update: This story element would seem to be a lie as it is based on Eric Hunters statement, now known to be false. However a caveat is in order. It is possible Hunder was in theater 10 and did see evidence of fired rounds penetrating into 10. It is possible he saw ‘something’ on the carpet and later presumed it was blood, or embellished. But it is impossible that he might have rescued two girls from Theater 9 because the only emergency exit in 10 is on the far right of the screen, with 9 to the left of the screen.

Yet there is this possibility, and it dovetails with other steps in this walk through: since Hunter was coming down the steps of the balcony area by his description, and obviously looking down to watch his step at least some of the time (else how see the blood?), then that means anyone might have used the emergency exit ahead of him. If so, it is indeed possible that when he reached and opened the door to the exit, that he encountered two girls and saw a third person which he might have assumed to be the Shooter from theater 9.

To do this, at the time of his statements, he would have had to erroneously presume that theater 9 was to the right instead of the left. That would not be too hard to do, especially if the bullets he thought entering were actually bullets which had already entered from the left and seen striking the right wall where he saw them. But that’s not the important aspect of the two girls story.

Unless a total fabrication, it is indeed possible there were three people in the hallway, two of them girls, one of them wounded. But if so, why were the two girls and the third person trying to get back in? The ONLY way that makes sense, given we know they did not come from theater 9, is if they had been in 10, fled the emergency exit, and once they got to the outer door, were turned back by a second gunman.

THAT could account for any injury, as well (but also, gunfire through the wall from 9 entering 10), and we might presume that, if turned back by a gunman, both the girls and Hunter presumed it to be the Shooter, when in point of fact, it would have to be a second (or third, etc.) participant.

Regardless of if Hunter lied or was foolish, the only possible reason that the Shooter might shoot the adjoining wall remains valid, as explained in the pre update text which follows (end of update, this section, more update2, further below), and that reason dovetails with the above paragraph in confirmation. Therefore, the original material remains seemingly valid, except for how the girls got into the exit hallway — AND did not come from theater 9, at all:

To better insure that theater 10 occupants do not use the EXIT, the Shooter fires at the wall between 9 and 10, immediately to his left, at which point his gun might have jammed. In any event, he is no longer facing centrally to the audience area. While he is attempting to remedy the jam, or facing away and shooting the wall, two teen girls make a break, perhaps having used the darkened area beneath the screen for additional cover, and go behind Shooter to the EXIT. Shooter, frustrated with the inability to fix the gun, sees the girls, or, if the gun had not jammed, he saw them and decided the rifle not the best weapon. He pulls a Glock and empties it in their direction and discards it, but does not yet give chase. He knows the girls will be trapped by Operative C who blocks the outer exit door. A second shooter complicates this explanation, which is a second reason I do not favor it.

Note: One possible remedy to the jam might have been to insert a standard ammo magazine, which would explain why the second gun had magazine and the drum was left inside. Alternately, we might wish to think he never had anything in the gun BUT a standard clip or two, and the half-empty drum was a prop left behind for Congressional anti-gun lobby delight.

7e) The girls are now in the adjoining hallway, but when they try to open the outer door, they find it blocked. Eric Hunter did ignore instructions from Operative B and opens the EXIT where he finds the girls, which he ends up helping back into 10. At this same time, Shooter is ejecting his ammo drum half used, either because it actually jammed, or because it was intended to be left behind to insure the use thereof made it into the press to stir angst against the right to bear arms. He then follows after the girls to kill them.

7f) update: as discussed immediately above, Hunter’s false statement completely invalidates this step, and yet, reanalysis based on discovery of the false statement, shows (also above) an alternate explanation which supplants this one. We might amend to say, it appears that yet another operative was at the exit door to prevent anyone from exiting and seeing anything there to illustrate a conspiracy.

We might even dare presume the two girls have simply elected not to come forward in the realization that, given the official story is a lone shooter lie, that to do so would put them in the same boat as the many witnesses who reported seeing a shooter on the grassy knoll, and soon thereafter met with strange accidents. If I had seen something, I’d conclude such a risk.

Shooter did chase the girls, but could not get past the EXIT door in 10 being held shut by Hunter. While he is attempting it, Jane Doe enters the hallway and is not noticed because Shooter’s vision is limited in a gas mask. It is not safe for shooter to take off his gas mask until there are no possible witnesses, if he is not Holmes — and there was likely some gas in the hallway. Shooter abandons his efforts and makes for the outer exit door and the parking lot. This may be because he is told Police are now approaching the scene via his communications earpiece, warned by Operatives outside based on their assessment of Police sirens. While this is going on, the little girl shot in the theater, and trapped by the body of an adult, is being given CPR by an young teenager, but she will die, and is clearly not Jane Doe.

8a) Operative C also knows that as Police near the scene, it is time for him to act. He releases the outer EXIT door for use by Shooter and enters the van to prepare for getaway. The side doors are open, engine running. Any others present are also ready to go, and James is seated in his car staring blankly, and largely oblivious.

8b) When Shooter opens the door to the outside, the little girl follows (also complicated if there is a second shooter, a third reason for disfavor), and is seen by Operative C as he looks sharply over his right shoulder through the side doors at the EXIT door, looking for Shooter. Shooter is told about Jane and he drops his gun to grab her, and in the struggle her shoes fall off. Perhaps because Shooter had to stoop, and being encumbered with weapons, he may have fallen to the ground, giving Jane a chance at freedom and a head start. He has thus far not even had a chance to remove his gas mask. Because James’ car obscures the details below hood height, and it is night, and all clothing and weapons are black, no one in the Van sees the Shooter drop the gun, and so, they do not retrieve it.

8c) Shooter regains his feet and gives chase as Police actually start to arrive on scene. He may have elected to leave his gas mask on to insure that if anyone saw him, they would not see his face (no orange hair). By the time he catches up to her at the corner of the building, Police see him at distance and call the sighting in to Dispatch; “suspect in gas mask.” The girl may have been concealed visually by cars parked in their line of sight.

8d) Shooter either looses his mask in the struggle or removes it as he makes his way back toward the exit with the girl. It is dropped very near the corner, leaving his hand free to procure his knife. It is soon over except for the bleeding. He lets her body slump forward to prevent blood from covering his clothing as a tell-tale marker, and carries her back to the doorway in a run and drops her.

8e) He likely saw Police and knows time is short. He leaves the gun on the ground or presumes it already picked up, and directly makes for and enters the van which pulls away. If a Police van with one or more uniformed occupants, escape would be assured. If not Police, a calm, cool driving speed and bravado would see them through. Police quickly zero in on James.

9) James is apprehended, and the story plays out in media. The second gun (in the car) is, in my opinion, likely there to imply James was prepared for an extensive standoff. But the second gas mask was not intended to be left behind. Operative(s) A and/or B use the confusion of the greater event to enter the security camera video room and replace or sabotage the tapes. They will flash Police ID if challenged. The first Policeman to arrive at James’ car who is able calls dispatch to report finding Jane Doe, and requesting an ambulance. But one cannot come, because they also find an IED in James’ car, and are waived off. A request to use a Police car is made, and that is likely why there were no chalk marks. But the mystery remains.

Note: since writing this post, the strange drowning death of expert swimmer and athlete nurse, Jennifer Gallagher, has been reported. One is moved to wonder if perhaps the little girl brought to a Hospital had been left in her care, and if perhaps someone was worried the little girl had managed to tell her something. Dead or alive, talking or not — no matter to the killer, because it would not do for a victim to exist with a knife wound and no murder weapon to be found at the crime scene. This would require that her body (dead or alive) and records of her presence would need be taken from the Hospital. If, for whatever reason, it was felt the nurse was the only one who knew about the child (which would be most unusual to normal hospital routines), she, too, would need to die. While this notion should not be a very likely scenario under normal hospital procedures, in a mass shooting with lots of victims, procedures may have been let drop, making it easier to ‘fix’ the situation. In any event, we need to know what happened to Jane Doe, and if it had anything to do with Jennifer’s tragic end. And, in keeping with the JFK analysis earlier offered… dozens of eye witnesses in Dallas suffered mysterious deaths in the weeks to months following the assassination.

10) Jame’s psychiatrist, not receiving a package intended for earlier delivery, calls Police over a package which is received ‘because it has no return address.’ I know you call the cops when that happens all the time.

And now you likely know more than ever before, more than Police are willing to admit, more than those behind this event would wish you to know.

All I want to know is the truth, and the current official version does not fit the bill. Yet I’m unhappy with my explanation, too, because if IT is true, it means the enemy who deems citizens expendable pawns for political power grabs is somewhere in the Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Media Complex. And the problem with that is… they are everywhere.

PLEASE: Comment (page bottom, or contact me), Rate (at page top), Share/Tweet this article. Visit my Reader Forum to promote your own cause or URL.

Related articles

25 Questions No One Has Asked About Aurora Shooting (pt. 2)

You can always spot a conspiracy at work… was james holmes a patsy by DOD or CIA? whenever you see evidence of a cover up in play

Our review continues from PART I, by H. Michael Sweeney, Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved. No reproduction permissions will be granted for the first 90 days. Links only, please.

In review: This in-depth series of posts will reveal startling new investigative issues for the first time, anywhere. The detail required to make concise arguments on a long list of critical elements forces it to be offered in installments. You may wish to subscribe to be sure you do not miss one along the way. Doing so, you will discover:

  • Three motives for making James Holmes a Patsy with Fascism as benefactor, and two possible motives for targeting Century Theaters
  • Easy link access to the key-most videos and images for each critical point of evidence presented in a logical, easy to follow order.
  • Reasoning there were at least three additional helpers involved in a professional black operation backed up by even more supporting players
  • Introduction of an actual political REASON for targeting The Dark Knight Rises (TDKR), a reason which fits one of the proposed motives
  • 25 key questions missed by almost everyone, the answer to any one of which could easily provide reasonable doubt that it was a lone gunman event
  • A walk-through narrative portraying an alternate scenario which fits all  conflicting facts into a workable reality.

James Holmes was a patsy Part Two

James Holmes was a patsy

 second gas mask and gun in aurora prove holmes a patsy

If you missed part one, click here

QUESTION 8: Who warned people not to use the EXIT in theater 8, and why? Tim McGrath mentions it, and I’ve seen but lost track of one other witness who confirmed the same point. Tim says the people in 8 were panicking and trying to leave. Toward the end of the clip he states someone entered the theater from the Lobby area and warned everyone not to go outside because the shooter was outside. Excuse me? How would they know this? If there was, WHO was it, because according to this witness, shooting was still going on in theater 9? Could this be misinterpretation or misunderstanding? I’d be open to the suggest except that it also happened in theater 10…

QUESTION 9: Who warned people not to use the EXIT in theater 10, and why? At 2:50 AM Channel 9 coverage has a witness from (by deduction) theater 10 who describes events while the shooting was going on in theater 9.  We really need to pin down if it was theater 10, so here is the deductive logic thread: Someone came into the theater from the left entrance, and warned them not to go outside, again while shooting was still taking place. Theater 9 would be to the left of theater 10, and theater 7 would be the left of theater 8. It would not be logical to presume someone further away from events (nearer to theater 7) to either be criminally involved or otherwise inclined or able to perceive a need for a warning. Any such person would need be closer, so it had to be theater 10. So again, who and why… would someone issue a warning without basis for such knowledge?

QUESTION 10: Why were bullets going through the walls into both theater 8 and 10? A look at the theater diagram from the Denver Post reveals that it would be logical for some rounds to pass through into 8, but there are only two ways it could have happened in theater 10. Either there was a second shooter unseen because people were attempting to hide or flee with their backs to the screen, or James deliberately turned his weapon on the wall. It is also possible any second shooter went behind the screen to appear in the dark on the far side, making them hard to see, but only if they used a silencer to completely suppress flash. This would create a distinctive sound witnesses did not report, as far as we know. Only in a cross fire situation should bullets logically enter 10, as shooting the wall is illogical. Why would James waste rounds to shoot the wall, especially since his shooting spree was ended prematurely when his gun jammed? Has anyone counted the bullet holes and compared to the half-empty magazine?

QUESTION 11: Who wore the second gas mask and used the second rifle found behind the theater? We have multiple Police statements which confirm James was found in his car and had with him in his car, a gas mask, and three guns: an AR-15 rifle, a Remington 870 shotgun, and a Glock handgun, with a second handgun and the high-capacity drum canister for the AR-15 discarded inside the theater.

Yet we have photographic evidence, Police radio traffic (18 minutes in), and additional statements to the press which prove a second mask and weapon were found lying on the ground behind the theater. The gun was at the threshold of the EXIT door, and the gas mask was found all the way at the end of the building, some 150 feet away from the EXIT and Jame’s car, where ‘the shooter’ is first reported being seen. The gas mask is part of a whole other series of questions which are the most troubling, of all. So why did James bring but not use two rifles, and two gas masks? And why does that weapon show a standard magazine (the light gray forward appendage). We were led to believe he quit shooting because his drum magazine jammed (which he left inside). Curious, as I would have thought the gun would be sans clip of any kind.

2nd gun with standard clip, girls shoes at outer exit leading to theater 9 & 10
2nd gas mask at far corner of building well away from where James waited

QUESTION 12: Why did the shooter not shoot the first and most logical victim? Jennifer Seeger clearly describes on ABC, a rifle being the first gun used to shoot into the air, and then it was leveled at her, but the shooter paused and did not shoot. She dropped to the ground and he instead opened fire on the crowd behind her. The clues to the answer as to why may lay in the next few questions.

QUESTION 13: Why does one witness says the first gun used was a rifle, and another a shotgun? We know he had both a Remington 870 shotgun and an AR-15 rifle with him. Both witnesses state the gun used was aimed directly at them, and both were within a couple of yard’s distance of the shooter and near to each other, and both took cover quickly. There are several other questions regarding these accounts, but the bottom line is that there is both a visual difference in the appearance of such weapons, and a stark difference between them their sound when fired. It is inconceivable that one can misidentify a shotgun as a rifle some mere feet away, especially once fired. Does the 870 shown at right look like a rifle, to you? Does the rifle look like a shotgun?

Which is which? Is it that hard to tell? What about the sound difference?

We have already examined Jenifer Seegar’s account. Here is the shotgun account by witness, Pierce O’Farrell, in a Channel 9 report, In point of fact, he was immediately shot at and wounded by shotgun, twice — once before being able to gain cover, and the second while he lay low.  All witnesses seem quite believable taken on their own, but I find a shooting victim with medical treatment confirming their story more credible than someone unscathed. Why two distinctly different accounts? Again, other questions may hold the answers…

QUESTION 14: Why did several witnesses stick around for more than a day and well into the night and even the next day after the shooting to be interviewed endlessly by local and national media, to include multiple appearances on a given media outlet? I raise this question because they both tended to use the same individualized phrases and hand gestures over and over, and both emphasize a lone gunman. In some cases, the cameras seem rather far back to insure we see the gestures. In fact, one of them goes overboard in his efforts, consistently waxing emotional to the point of tears. More to the point, the conflicting facts cited above play into the matter, and may be why more than one ‘conspiracy theorist’ has suggested these are paid actors intending to Wag-the-Dog.

Here is the man, Chris Ramos, on CNN. This is him on ABC. The others are Jenifer Seegar and her friend from the ‘rifle’ account just spoken of. She is seen here on ABC, and here on CNN. Her companion who frequently appears with her but who hardly speaks, becomes a kind of ‘silent confirmation’ to cement the reality of her statements. If these habitual appearances are not a Wag-the-Dog plot element, I’d like to know what they really are? Seegar’s not being shot and not knowing which weapon first was used suggests she was not actually present — but if that’s true, then the only way she could have known about the first shot being in the air would be if she was a participant with prior knowledge of the plan. There are yet other clues of Wag-the-Dog forces in play, as seen next.

QUESTION 15: How did CNN’s Wolf Blitzer manage to so quickly have available a slick 3-D computer-rendered, fully touch-screen interactive replay of the crime, and why was it altered between airings? His show, some 12 hours after the shooting, but only a few hours after witness accounts and Police statements useful for the purpose were known, provided the most comprehensive report yet available, and put EVERYTHING from the OFFICIAL  STORY into clear context. Find it here, the third video down in the group of smaller videos toward page bottom. How did they mange to have this super sophisticated technology ready to go so quickly, unless prepared in advance?

I am additionally concerned because subsequent use of the same presentation in a later program is altered. The first presentation shows only James’ entry via the EXIT and the aftermath (e.g., the kicking in the door first impression). The second shows someone going to the EXIT from within the theater to the EXIT door, depicting them LEAVING, which NO WITNESS HAS DESCRIBED, followed shortly by the shooter’s entrance (as if not expecting someone would end up recounting the man opening the door, and thus it does NOT show him returning from the door, but vanishing). Witnesses specifically describe the man from inside as NOT leaving the theater by the EXIT and a significant delay before the shooter arrives.

You see the altered version here at one minute into the CNN video.  This change took place after challenges to the ‘kick the door’ claims were taking hold on the Web, perhaps best exemplified by Alex Jones’ special report to that end earlier in the day. Yet the witness reports about the man opening the door (and NOT leaving) were known to media before even the first airing. Why was it not included in the first place if not Wag-the-Dog? Why was it subsequently altered to an INCORRECT depiction, later? Yet one more possible clue follows…

Was Aurora shooting a DOD or CIA operation?

The next installment asks these important questions:

James Holmes • How did CBS News know to describe ‘buckets of ammunition’ before anyone had seen inside Jame’s apartment?
James Holmes • Why did the shoot try to get into theater 10 after leaving 9 when his gun was jammed?
James Holmes • Why was James so calm when arrested when the official reason is impossible?
James Holmes • Why did James allegedly mail his attack plan to arrive well before the attack?
James Holmes • Why did his Psychiatrist call Police when it was not delivered to insure they found it anyway? 
James Holmes • Why was almost everyone in James’ life connected directly or indirectly with Mind Control technology?
James Holmes • And more…
PLEASE: Comment (page bottom, or contact me), Rate (at page top), Share/Tweet this article. Visit my Reader Forum to promote your own cause or URL. 
Related articles

25 Questions No One Has Asked About Aurora Shooting

Answering them reveals there was no lone gunman

A careful in-depth review by an author who specializes in crimes of the NWO and Intelligence Community, to include MC, by H. Michael Sweeney, Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved. No reproduction permissions will be granted for the first 90 days. Links only, please.

This in-depth article will reveal dozens of startling new investigative issues for the first time, anywhere. The detail required to make concise arguments on a long list of critical elements forces it to be offered in installments. You may wish to subscribe to be sure you do not miss one along the way. Doing so, you will discover:

  • Three motives for making James Holmes a Patsy with Fascism as benefactor, and a possible motive for targeting Century Theaters
  • Easy link access to the key-most videos and images for each critical point of evidence presented in a logical, easy to follow order.
  • Reasoning there were at least three additional helpers involved in a professional black operation backed up by even more supporting players
  • Introduction of an actual political REASON for targeting The Dark Knight Rises (TDKR), a reason which supports one of the proposed motives for choosing James Holmes as Patsy
  • 25 key questions missed by almost everyone, the answer to any one of which could easily provide reasonable doubt that it was a lone gunman event, or that James even pulled a trigger
  • A walk-through narrative portraying an alternate scenario which fits all  conflicting facts into a workable reality.

 James Holmes was a patsy Part One 

James Holmes was a patsy

Introduction: my credentials and methods


H. Michael Sweeney

The reader, if to have confidence in my commentary, should know my credentials. I write this as an author of seven books ( generally upon topics which relate directly in any analysis of the matters in Aurora. That includes the topic of Political Control Technology (PCT — mind control), which mainstream media and government still refuses to acknowledge as a real and valid topic. This they do despite the blatantly available facts which abound, even to include evidence uncovered by Congressional Investigation. My full bio is available here.

But before we get into the meat of these matters, I want you to please stop and see this one video which is by far the most emotional and heart tugging (in a good way) of witness accounts: Jamie Rohre, telling how he and his family were under fire, and the frantic events and steps taken while worrying about his infants and their Mother from whom he had become separated. They were apparently not married, but the interview reveals that once reunited in the hospital, he immediately proposed, and she accepted. WORTH A WATCH. Good can overcome tragedy when you let it.

James Holmes was a patsy

Motives and Political Hay vs. Justice

I would hope my feeble efforts would raise serious questions for not just citizens, but also in the minds of officials; questions which a moral person should rightly feel in clear need of answering if justice is to be served. Questions which might lead any legal defense team working for James to a useful defense proving him innocent. Unfortunately, I have no reason to believe that is the goal of either the Court or the Police in this matter, and suspect any defense will be guaranteed to be marginal, at best. As common in all prior mass shooting events, assassination plots, and terrorist events, political hay is more important than a statue of a blindfolded lady, or her set of scales.

Motive 1: The most popular motive talked about the Web is the most obvious; the ‘trade your rights for security’ myth, a key step in order to allow a tighter Police State grip on the people. The hay in mass shootings and assassination plots is gun control, which is the key-most step on the way toward a Police State, and the only way it could long survive or even come to power in America. The proof of these remarks is perhaps easiest to illustrate by the ‘coincidence’ that in every shooting or terror event, Congress just happens to have in hand legislation ready for quick approval (but not reading or due debate) which provides a good deal of such hay for their New World Order horses.

In Aurora, it would be found in three forms, the first of which was, rather than a new law, a need to discuss the United Nations Treaty on Small Arms. Constitutionalists and gun owners fear the Treaty would force the 2nd Amendment to be repealed and guns to be confiscated, the approval of which was scheduled to be determined in a matter of mere days after the shooting. Fortunately, the effort failed and the treaty was not signed, but that does not end the matter; the U.N. has simply rescheduled for reconsideration to give them time to attempt to make the treaty more appealing (the US was not the only country to refuse it), and a new a sales pitch (more mass shootings, perhaps, such as the Temple shooting in Wisconsin?). I have already screamed my warning thoughts on the gun-grab topic in a series of posts cited at the end of this post. For the best overview of the treaty with both sides of view, visit the Judge Ben C. Green Law Library.

Motive 2: Less commonly discussed, but also logical; the Web is flush with stories stating James’ Father is a whistle blower set to testify in a Federal matter which would, if found damaging, be a potential motive for using as Patsy, his son. His father developed software used to monitor banking transactions for fraud, and it is said that his program detected and can prove where the trillion dollar losses really went — as criminal profits. Imagine trading a finding of mental incapacitation instead of a death sentence in exchange for favorable testimony. As result, his Father is said to have been scheduled to appear as a witness in a Federal Court as a whistleblower. At this point I would be remiss if not admitting the factual value as a motive is based on early speculation, as there has been no useful verification of any such court appearance. It would take considerable study of his Father’s situation to find facts before I accept it as factual, but it is sufficient a red flag as to deserve such study. Read about that, here.

Even more interesting, as a related mater, is that TDKR plot line is rather a strong parallel to the financial crimes under consideration. It may be EXACTLY THE REASON why James, and why TDKR. There is an excellent review of the film with that view in mind, here, with some useful background info on the software in question. Later, we will see there is also a potential reason why Century Theaters.

Motive 3: Also a matter to be determined more concretely, the third potential motive remains quite consistent with my findings in case after case when working with targeted individuals. I’m talking about victims of PCT, which is what I fear James Holmes is based on the wealth of clues in the greater picture. Such persons are always targeted for a reason. Almost always, that reason is FEAR of what the individual knows about some covert and illegal or immoral government Agency’s doings.

James Holmes, like so many of my clients, worked in projects associated with such an Agency; in his case, DARPA, the Defense Advance Research Project Agency. The work, in fact, specifically dealt with matters relating to Political Control Technology, though that is certainly not how they choose to describe it publicly. Learn more about his work, here.

What I find particularly interesting is that, in Jame’s case, the location where this work was undertaken was only two main intersections away from the shooting, essentially on the same Street. Just as interesting, is that he lived just ten minutes by foot away from work, only a couple of blocks from the theater, also just off of that same street, again. We will find some significance in that, later.

Being a PCT victim or even a threat to the entire PCT program would not in and of itself be a motive to set up an elaborate ploy to have them put away for life. There would be simpler solutions. However, if considered such a threat, it would make them a more logical candidate for Patsy among other candidates for a project which was slated regardless of if it was to be James, or not. Better to kill two birds with one stone than two stones.

With these motives and curiosities in mind, let’s tear into the conflicts inherent within the official story:

 James Holmes was a patsy

What we told and can see raises serious questions

“Conspiracy theories” happen when there are obvious questions ignored by officials in government and media (Elephants in the room), where presented facts do not jive one with another. This is always the first hallmark of a cover up in a major story. I should make clear to the reader: there is NEVER a cover up UNLESS there is a CONSPIRACY. A cover up REQUIRES it, in fact, or it becomes impossible to arrange — especially when the “the only person of interest” is behind bars and cannot so arrange. Now, because media has not asked ANY of the questions herein, we must assume such a cover up has begun. Failure to question is a tell-tale hallmark which soon enough results in charges of ‘conspiracy theorists’ when challenged.

So let’s take a look at some of the questions I find most troubling, and address them. I’m not talking about external matters such as reports that FBI pulled a terror warning regarding theater attacks being a possibility. I’m talking about shooting details, doing so because I’m anxious to be called conspiracy theorist one more time, because I love pointing out that’s just a labeling game to avoid discussing issues. So, after I ask all the questions, I’ll present the ONLY plausible scenario which answers all the questions without contradictions, a replay of the crime as a false flag event involving multiple participants.

QUESTION 1: Why did a Judge, within mere hours of the shooting, order all records sealed in this matter as ‘contrary to public interests?’ What facts had been uncovered that early in the investigation which prompted such a concern? It would not be until well into the next day that facts even started to usefully unfold for such an important consideration. I’d like to know who moved for such a ruling, and the reasoning behind their request (stated reasons do not always equate to actual motive). Could it have been a call from Washington D.C., which sparked it?

QUESTION 2: Why was there a training exercise based on the same exact scenario underway at the same time, less than ten minutes away? The Denver Post reports such an exercise indeed took place at the Parker Medical Institute. A common theme in ‘terrorist’ events thought to be a false flag operation, is the holding of a training exercise for exactly the same type event at the same general place and time. This was certainly the case for Sept. 11 and the Subway/Bus bombing in London, for instance, and I seem to recall it being so with the Saran gas attacks in Japan.

QUESTION 3: Why did media first talk about the “lone shooter” effecting his crime by “kicking in the EXIT door?” Like all patsy shooting events, the initial stories given to and relayed by media without question create the all-important ‘first and lasting impression’ in the minds of the public. It would be impossible for anyone to kick in a fire door designed to open outward. In like manner, with the confusion clearly in place, no one could know with confidence at the outset that there was only one shooter, even if true.

No witness could rightly so claim. No Cop would be so foolish as to make such a statement. I would hope no reporter would invent it. But several early news accounts, including one aired on FOX Radio (play the second audio file on the linked page) a single witness identified (in print) only as ‘Pam,’ said exactly that.  Why, unless a ‘planted’ statement for Wag-the-Dog* media manipulation? The first known airing was actually from NBC affiliate, Channel 9, on the scene. From their unthinking quote of ‘Pam’, news people everywhere simply repeated the line, just as mindlessly, and as if fact. Isn’t that a great way to get an initial mental image out into the public?

Was Aurora shooting a DOD or CIA operation?

James Holmes * An expression whereby news is manipulated by Men in Black to make people think things are much different than they really are,
James Holmes    popularized and hilariously illustrated in the Book and film of the same name starring Dustin Hoffman, Robert De Niro, 

QUESTION 4: Why did ABC News deliberately take James’ Mother’s quote out of context to indicate ‘they had the right person’ in arresting James? She has officially protested through legal counsel that that statement was in confirmation to HER identity upon first contact by phone. Again, media twists words and thereby assures ‘first and lasting impressions,’ a known Wag-the-Dog tactic.

QUESTION 5: Who lobbed gas canisters into the Lobby? At 3:29AM, as part of an interview with Police Chief Dan Oates after capture of James Holmes at the rear of the theater complex, a Channel 9 report  reveals a lone gunman entered the lobby and discharged a gas canister and THEN went on the shooting spree. As we will soon see, there are other reasons to believe someone was in the Lobby doing just that. In fact, multiple someones. Did the man in the Lobby have orange hair? No one is telling, no one is asking. Why?

We might reasonably assume the above report an error, an assumption. But in a Web radio interview with witness Tim McGrath who was in theater 8 adjacent to the theater 9 where the shooting took place, we learn that while the shooting took place, there were FLASHES seen with the loud pops described as coming from behind, which would be the lobby/hallway area. It would, after all, be impossible to see any visual signs of activity in the adjacent theater where the shooting took place. So there really was additional activity in the lobby area such as flash bang smoke grenades, as confirmed by the other reports. Moreover, the Police dispatch audio tape appears to reference the front door (Lobby entrance) as being ‘blown out,’ at about 3:50 into the audio.

These events could in no way be undertaken by James Holmes, as he would need to take the time to exit the lobby after throwing canisters and make his way all the way around the building to the back, change clothes, arm himself, and then enter via the EXIT… in time for them to go off in the Lobby and be seen and heard while he is shooting. It makes no sense. How is this possible without at least one accomplice?

QUESTION 6: Who opened the EXIT in theater 9 for James? We now have multiple witnesses who saw someone within the theater open the EXIT door something like 20 minutes before it was used by the shooter. Without stating it in so many words, it is clear Police think it Holmes who opened the door, and then exited the theater through the Lobby to go around to the back where he prepared himself and then used that door.

But there is an oddity, here, because the man opening the door is not described by any witness as having blazing orange hair.  Why not? It was not seen on the shooter, either, because of his head covering. Why wear the hair if not intending to show it? We will come back to this question. But we also have to ask, by what logic or reasoning would James not simply take the EXIT directly to his car and then return? Why return into the theater/lobby area, at all, unless it be a different person with yet another assignment to be fulfilled who did so?

QUESTION 7: How did the shooter gain entrance to REAR EXIT of the building at the time of the shooting? We know how he gained entrance to the theater through the EXIT door but that doorway led only to a short hallway serving theater 10 and 9 together, to yet another secure fire door opening to the lot where James’ car was parked. How did that door get opened for James? No one on the Web has addressed this question before me, and I think I know the answer.

Was Aurora shooting a DOD or CIA operation?

The next installment asks these questions:

James Holmes • Who warned people not to use the EXIT doors advising the shooter was outside, and why?
James Holmes • Why did the shooter waste bullets shooting at a blank wall causing bullets to enter theater 10?
James Holmes • Who wore the second gas mask and used the second rifle found at the scene?
James Holmes • Why did the shooter not shoot the most logical victim?
James Holmes • Why did that victim describe the first weapon used was a Rifle, when another says shotgun – who was indeed shot by a shotgun?
James Holmes • And more…
PLEASE: Comment (page bottom, or contact me), Rate (at page top), Share/Tweet this article. Visit my Reader Forum to promote your own cause or URL. 

Updated: Confidential Conversations that Never Happened…

A parody of real-life mechanisms in conspiracy cleanup (coverup contingencies)

by H. Michael Sweeney
permission to duplicate granted provided reproduced in full and all links remain in tact, with credit given to the author and as source.

James holmes is a patsy in a false flag operation

Update Aug. 29, 2012: As result of the popularity of my multi-part post on the Aurora shooting which is the most exhaustive review of facts to date, and because of the revelations the investigation involved in the effort have afforded, this post is woefully inadequate and no longer reflects the true concerns. Therefore, this update is actually a major rewrite to make it more in harmony with the true facts, rather than the early conjecture available on the Web at the time of its first writing. Additions or changes heralded in red. Any original material remains in tact, but in strike-through text, as I do not wish anyone to feel the material may have been censored for any other cause. Article begins:

Whenever the official story starts to have cracks in it, the cleaners go to work in Wag-the-Dog fashion, and power is applied to the weakest pressure points to make things ‘better for all concerned.’  As one CIA operative (one of the clean-cut train hobos at Dallas in ’63 set to cause a ruckus if the Grassy Knoll escape plan looked like it might be compromised) told me, “History is what we say it is, and it will not be changed by you or anyone else.”

Er… OK. But don’t fault me for trying the truth now and then, and forgive me with any liberties I take in the absence of good solid news reports full of details and hard facts… a matter which always makes me wonder what we are really dealing with…

James holmes a mind-controlled patsy?
                                                                                Come the terror at night,
                                                                                            or by day,
                                                                                the citizens Plight is,
                                                                                            or it may,
                                                                                be which one is right,
                                                                                            by what they say,
                                                                                who is guilty of the fright,
                                                                                            and how shall we repay?
                                        I wrote that with Aurora in mind, but it applies to a long American history of dark bumps in the dark, does it not?
James holmes is a patsy in a false flag operation
Aurora was a horror of unimaginable evil, yet I can’t help but believe the cause of it was a greater and even more unfathomable evil than we can know. This parody is to help you see the several reasons I am so concerned. But I remind you I was not there, and I cannot know enough but to be dangerous to those that do. Read between the lines on that statement, as it has double meaning.
James holmes is a patsy in a false flag operation

Added section: Ring: The receiver is lifted, but no greeting is offered, the Executive seated at the expansive desk in a plush office recognizing the calling number.

Voice on line: “The script will be ready on July 20. Adjust your plans accordingly.” The line went dead and the Executive hung up, and then dialed a number of his own.

Executive: “I’m green lighting Drum Roll. Production can begin at once, with a shooting date set for July 20. Make sure the cast and props are ready by then, and there are no problems in the storyboarding and rehearsals.” And then he hangs up.

Note: Double speak is the intelligence community perfected ‘art’ of speaking in the open about something by couching key matters in allegory or parable form. In the above example, we see how someone in the motion picture industry might talk about a film production… that was really something else… Drum Roll being the role played by the drum magazine in the shooting. Storyboarding means contingency planning, and rehearsals means that everyone knows the plan forwards and backwards. The script refers to the scheduled date of the theater shooting exercise which ‘just happened’ to be being held the same day of the shooting some ten minutes away off the same Freeway access as enjoyed by the Century theater. Interesting because high-risk intel ops such as would be true of a false flag operation, tend to employ a similar ‘drill’ for a like event on the same day and in the same city. This provides a cover operation so that if an operative is compromised, they will not be arrested and the plot can be aborted without exposure of the truth. End of added section.

James holmes is a patsy in a false flag operation

Ring:  “Hello? News reporter here.”

Recognized voice: “The word’s going out to all our newsies… be sure to point out he had over $20,000 in high-tech equipment, and have another story by someone else suggest there is reason to believe there were Islamic ties, and be sure to play up the gun violence angle. And be sure not to mention he worked on that DARPA* project to develop super soldiers. That U.N. Treaty must be signed!”

News reporter:  “But the shooting just happened. There’s been no time for an investigation, yet. What’s our source?”

Recognized voice: “Don’t worry about that. Just say ‘sources close to the investigation,’ and people won’t be smart enough to know any better… except for the ‘conspiracy buffs’ which you already know how to deal with.”

News reporter: “Right. By simply calling them that and ridiculing them for it. Got to hand it to Walter Cronkite for making that work so well in the JFK thing.”

*D.A.R.P.A. Defense Advanced Research Project Agency

Note: Walter was ex Army intel, and would have been a logical go-to person as part of CIA’s Operation Mockingbird which infiltrated news media with, by various estimates, over 1,000 operatives from CIA or on their payroll under the table. Since JFK, no conspiracy investigation has made good headway because media keeps trotting this excuse to ignore the valid questions of civilian investigators and investigative authors, or Engineers, Pilots, and other professionals who come forward with challenges to the official explanations. As one well known Comedian like to say, “I don’t get no respect, you know?”

James holmes is a patsy in a false flag operation

Ring: “Hello, Police Public Spokesperson.”

Recognized voice: “You have to stop talking about the possibility of the shooter having help. He’s a lone nut, nothing more.”

Police Public Spokesperson: “But people are trying to figure out how he got he got the larger weapons into the theater and all that gear. We already have one witness who’s been quoted as seeing someone open the Emergency Exit for him.”

Recognized voice: “Don’t worry about him. We have that covered. And don’t worry about what people think. We tell them what to think. Just do as I say.”

Police Public Spokesperson: “O.K. If you say so. Has everyone else in the loop here been so advised, or do I need to have an excuse to pass along?”

Recognized voice: “The key people are our people. We have it all covered, just like L.A. with the RFK matter.”

Note: In Robert Kennedy’s assassination, the Radio Dispatcher who controlled what Cops did that day and the Chief of Police were ex CIA. No wonder cops did not pursue the Woman in the Polka Dot dress, and the L.A.P.D. destroyed all the evidence which indicated more shots were fired than contained in Sirhan Sirhan’s gun, and did not protest that the fatal wounds came from the other side of his body where Thane Ceaser, a security staffer to a CIA involved military contractor had been walking directly behind Robert at the time of the shooting.

James holmes is a patsy in a false flag operation

Door shuts behind the lone interrorgator (spelling on purpose), and he takes a seat before the exhausted man at the desk. Interrorgator: “You told our people at the theater that you saw someone open the Exit Door for the shooter a  second smoke grenade thrown from the opposite direction?”

Eyewitness: “Yes. I couldn’t see who because it was silhouettes against the movie screen might have thrown it.”

Interrorgator: “That’s impossible. We know the shooter was a lone gunman, and had no help. We have lots of people lined up who are going to be saying they saw it differently.”

Eyewitness: “I know what I saw. I was not more than ten feet away, and he crossed in it flew right in front of me.”

Interrorgator: “That’s not what you saw. The confusion and fear of the shooting has simply confused your memory. All you saw was someone getting up to take a leak or buy some popcorn. He never opened the door was some action on the theater screen from the movie…   your mind has simply played a trick on you and filled in the blanks.”

Eyewitness: “No. I’m certain.”

Interrorgator: “Listen, kid. I’m going to lay it on the line for you.” Grabs him by the collar and jerks him halfway across the table. “I’m telling you, and you’d better listen up real careful like, you didn’t see that, you were confused. If you tell anyone you saw that, something bad might happen to you. There are a lot of people upset about this, and some of them have tempers and are looking for someone to go after. They don’t think very clearly, and I’m trying to keep you from getting seriously hurt… or your family for the matter. Do I make myself clear?”

Eyewitness: “You’re threatening me? With those people watching behind the mirror with cameras?”

Interrorgator: “You’re Goddamn right I’m threatening you.” Slaps face. “I sent those people on break and killed the camera, but in five more minutes, I’m going to call them back and we are going to be asking you the same question I started with, and you had better damn well tell me you were confused, or you and yours have NO F***ING FUTURE.” Shoves him back into his seat. “Do we agree on that, or not? Because if not, I can’t protect you!”

Eyewitness: “O.K.  O.K. You win. I’m confused. I didn’t see anything except someone going to get popcorn.”

Note: Something almost identical to this happened to witnesses at JFK, RFK, and MLK, as well as the Flight 80o shoot down. Witnesses are often ‘told what they saw’ and told they were ‘confused by events,’ to allow investigators to later say their initial statements were not useful because of duress under stress impacting their memory.

James holmes is a patsy in a false flag operation

Ring: “Hello, Fire Department.”

Police Department: “We need you to take a Ladder Truck over to the shooter’s place and look in the window for us.”

Fire Department: “Why? We’ve never done anything like that before. What’s going on?”

Police Department: “We just want to make sure its not booby trapped. You need to tell us if it is so you we can send the Bomb Squad out.”

Fire Department: “Did the shooter say something to make you think there’s a bomb?”

Police Department: “Uh… sure. Yea. Something like that.”

Fire Department: “Well why not just send the bomb squad.”

Police Department: “Well, uh… I’m just doing what I’m told. I think they want high visibility with the press. Uh… you know… to make everyone look good. You will look good. We will look good… on TV… our small community will look good on national TV.”

Fire Department: “Whatever you say, Chief.”

Note: At a disadvantage with no concrete facts, there may have been a legitimate reason for asking the Fire Department to participate. Yet they did eventually send the Bomb Squad in and the first thing done was to use robots. Did the robots go in the window? Not that I’ve seen on video. No, they went in the front door. How do we know this? Because we have video of the bomb squad breaking out a portion of the window which would have needed to be removed if using the window for insertion of robots… doing so from the inside after the robots had finished. So why would there not have been a booby trap on the door blowing the robot away? That’s the FIRST thing I’d booby trap if of a mind to booby trap anything.

James holmes is a patsy in a false flag operation

Ring: “Bomb squad.”

Familiar Voice: “Be sure to blow a lot of stuff up at the practice demolition site afterwards.”

Bomb squad: “Why not just use the portable unit we always take with us? There’s nothing here large enough to require the demolition site.”

Familiar Voice: “TV coverage. Want to look good on TV, don’t you? Besides, the order comes from the top.”

Bomb squad: “Fine. We can have the rookies get in some practice at the same time.”

Note: The portable units (Mobile Explosion Containment Units) can contain significant blasts, but are not necessarily used for on-site demolition of bombs. They would perhaps prefer to instead transport explosives to a demolition site, as the units provide increased safety for such transport. However, some devices might be judged unsafe for transport, and should perhaps be destroyed at the crime scene. WHEN MULTIPLE DEVICES are found, there are several interesting possibilities which drove my inclusion of this portion of the dialogs.

a)    The devices were too large to detonate on site. But we know that is not the case because we saw them on TV and they were small explosions (keep in mind that they use explosive devices to explode the bombs, so whatever blast you see is necessarily larger than the bomb by itself would have been.) Further, had this been the case, they should have likely been too large for collective transport, exceeding the safe operating limits of the mobile unit. But they were not shown making multiple trips to accommodate multiple bombs, so we again know this was not the case.

b)   Despite the number of devices, their cumulative potential for damage is collectively within the ability of the chamber’s ability to safely transport through populated streets. IN SUCH A CASE, the bombs would normally be disposed of at the bomb squad’s facilities as a SINGLE BLAST. But we saw video on the news of multiple blasts in close proximity. This CONFIRMS they were not big blasts individually, and should have been done as a single blast. Why not? I can think of only one reason: Publicity stunt.

James holmes is a patsy in a false flag operation

Added section: Ring: “Executive speaking.”

Voice on line: “There’s been a problem with that special script for Drum Roll. It hasn’t been received by the Publicist.”

Executive: “Well where the hell is it, then?”

Voice: “We think it might be lost in the mail room for some reason.”

Executive: “Well get the… ah, you know… the ‘Director of Security’… to go search for it, then. That’s an important matter useful to Advertising and Promoting Drum Roll to the viewing public.”

Voice: “How do I do that? What do I tell them is the reason?”

Executive: Pauses. “I don’t know. It’s your job to solve problems like this.” Pauses again. “But try this; tell the Publicist to call the Director and complain about a suspicious package… and use that to get Security involved. Use your imagination.” Slams the receiver with a curse.

Note: Director of Security is their contact in the Police Dept. The Publicist is the Psychologist, or someone acting on her behalf. For some strange reason, the Psychologist indeed contacted Police about a strange package which showed up on her desk with no name on it, which turned out to be nothing but a text book being returned by a student. The explanation was concern, after the news about the bombs in James’ apartment, that it might be a bomb from James — in which case I wonder how James managed to put it on her desk while he was under arrest. For an even stranger reason, Police then searched the entire mail room to find the ‘script’ James allegedly mailed explaining in detail his plan to shoot up the theater. Strangest of all is that it was sent 8 days prior to the shooting. End of added section.

Next dialog, and the last, most telling of all…

Interrogator: “O.K., James. You want to tell us why you did it?”

James: “Did what? Why I am under arrest?”

Note: Jame’s reaction after the shooting is no different than Sirhan Sirhan (RFK), Jack Ruby (Oswald), David Chapman (John Lennon), Arthur Bremer (George Wallace), Squeaky Fromme (Reagan), and John Hinkley (Reagan), and others: No attempt to escape, in many cases going limp or calmly waiting nearby for arrest. Many of them have no recollection of the event, or have a single line of ‘political’ thought on it which they repeat, or start to explain and then just at the critical moment, change the subject.

These are all known methods of dissociation symptomatic of programmed Manchurian Candidates who are incapable of ‘confessing’ the truth, as they genuinely are not aware of it. In this case, we know he simply waited in his car and put up no resistance. What we don’t really know is if he has told the Police anything at all, but must presume not, or it would have been all over the news in some form or another.

So I’m taking the liberty and risk to assume, here. Please forgive any Ass made out of You and Me thereby. If I’m way off base, I’d be just as happy with the thought you may have gotten some entrainment value from it… because if I’m not off base, we are all going to end up mad enough to bring down the government and lynch some people.

James holmes is a patsy in a false flag operation

Please rate this article at page top, tweet/share, and comment. All comments welcome, good or bad.

%d bloggers like this: