Dorner, the Urban Legend: Implications Behind a Fraudulent Manifesto
What would it really mean if Dorner did not write the Manifesto claimed for him? Like many bumps-in-the-night mysteries in our national consciousness… the answer may lead to CIA and the Military.By H. Michael Sweeney, copyright © 2013, all rights reserved, proparanoid.wordpress.com Permission to duplicate online hereby granted provided it is reproduced in full with all links and text colors in tact and unaltered, including this notice. The image is specifically excluded from permissions to duplicate: see text with image. Dorner, the Urban Legend: Implications Behind a Fraudulent Manifesto
What you will learn reading this blog:• That there are more, darker possibilities than the obvious bad Cop framing a good Cop; • that possibilities include direct ties to Rodney King and Operation Verdict in support of Martial Law for a military coup; • that CIA has infiltrated LAPD (and most major LEA) for their own criminal needs and may be at the heart of Dorner’s fate; • that there are many clues most of us have missed which foster TEN new questions which help understanding; Did CIA or Military frame and murder Dorner? What is the truth about Chris Dorner?
In my prior blog post in this series, I showed more than a dozen reasons to question if Dorner’s Manifesto were his manifesto, at all. While portions were surely written by him, it also seems clear that because of different writing styles and the very construction employed, as well as external evidences relating to the security of Dorner’s Computer activity — the sections which paint Dorner as a mad killer were by someone else. I’m not the first to suggest it, but perhaps the first to fully dissect and expose. Without those additions, all you have is a laundry list of LAPD wrongdoing and an open letter to LAPD pleading for resolution by a perfectly good Cop.
If we agree that there is reason to question the authorship of the condemning portions of the document… then we have to wonder what else about the greater Dorner matter is real?
There had to be a motive, and a pretty powerful one, at that, to warrant setting Dorner up for murder and feeding us lies. So much of Dorner’s laundry list of LPD sins ultimately translate into or directly relate to racial prejudice. Dorner cites everything from racial slurs to violence, specifically mentioning the Rodney King beating/video to show how systemic it has been. But this cannot be the motive, in my opinion.
Racist Cop complaints are, within LAPD, a small-potatoes issue representing little ‘threat’ sufficient to motivate the fraud and murders involved. LAPD, even as Dorner points out, has a long history of such prejudice and covering ups. When leadership habitually protects those who step out of line in this regard, there is no threat worthy of the death penalty in yet one more accusation, even if by a fellow Officer. We are moved to think it has to be something else. Or does it?
Was Dorner a CIA or DOD patsy?
In the game of Hearts, playing the Spades can steal the whole deck
In the game of political power and control, it is our Hearts and minds which are at stake via psychological manipulation of the masses. The closer you look past the thin and faulty veneer of the Dorner story, the more the clues we find which lead us not just to bad Cops in LAPD, but also, unfortunately, to the CIA and Department of Defense and very dark things that threaten to impact us all. So hang on… this is a far bumpier ride than the manhunt we see on the surface.
As I document in my bookset, Fatal Rebirth (new special low price offer in place, by the way), the 1992 Rodney King beating Dorner was careful to cite — had led to CIA reconnaissance overflights of major US Cities to perform low-level, high-resolution aerial photomapping of black neighborhoods for something called Project Verdict. Verdict was preparation for the declaration of Martial Law if rioting broke out nation-wide when the trial of the 4 LAPD Officers involved was concluded with an expected white-wash verdict of ‘innocent’. So concluded, it was.
And based on a lot of indicators, it was planned that way from the start; a plot to overthrow the Constitution.
But it failed, though LA indeed became a battle ground like never seen in any American City, requiring the National Guard AND US Marines to restore order. 53 died, more than 2,000 were injured, and nearly 4,000 fires leveled whole neighborhoods and cinderized over 1,000 businesses. Had other cities followed suit, the whole deck of cards would likely now be under military control, exactly as forecast by our highest ranking military in the event of nation-wide martial.
Now know this: in the time frame of the beating, trial, and aftermath, King was reportedly described by various officials predisposed to rude thoughts as the ‘King of Spades.’ Also active World-wide at the time was Operation Gladio (still in play, today, it seems), a US/NATO clandestine effort to topple Communist Bloc nations which further evolved to include a series of false flag terror events targeting Americans and NATO citizens to justify repressive draconian responses. Was Verdict part of Gladio? No way to know, but it sure fits the mold.
Fortunately, Verdict was thwarted. But I have to ask: was it intended from the start to foster a military coup? POTUS in ’92 was an old CIA man, George Herbert Walker Bush, a man tied to many of the darkest of bumps in the night America has ever known, from JFK to Watergate, and beyond. An excellent review exists in book by Pete Brewton, The Mafia, The CIA, and Goerge Bush, intro here. Gladio was under his watch as CIA Director, and while in the Oval Office.
1992 was a hotly contested election year, and conspiracy rumor mills of the day were warning that a military coupe was in the making to insure Bush held office; under Martial Law, the election could be cancelled. Rodney King may have been the key to such a plan. Absurd? Perhaps, but let’s consider it for a moment, anyway:
Bush was running for second term against Clinton and billionaire H. Ross Perot. Clinton had his own CIA ties, as did Hillary, but I won’t bore you with the details, here — but when I was saying the same publicly, I got hate email laced with expletives directly from the Oval Office. I was at the time researching my four-volume bookset, Fatal Rebirth, documenting crimes of the New World Order from 1947 forward.
As result of my investigation, it became clear to me that H. Ross Perot was a dangerous threat to the two-party system of power control via Dog and Pony Shows of pretended and superfluous political differences. Given Perot’s growing popularity, I feared they would take him out. He was last Century’s ‘Ron Paul,’ without the benefit of a congressional title.
I warned the Secret Service, who did nothing but put ME under surveillance for five years. Meanwhile, Anthrax was mailed to Perot’s family (the same thing used to silence one of Bill Clinton’s State Police-assigned body guards when he was Governor of Arkansas, to silence him from testifying about Clinton’s ties to CIA drug running in Iran-Contra, a George Bush sanctioned operation.) The Perot attack was confirmed to me by my own back-channel Secret Service Agent contact. It forced him to quit the race the night of the Colorado Primary, which he won even after quitting. Had he not quit, it would have given him enough electoral votes to have a place on the main Nov. election ballot.
But the NWO does not want you to have true freedom of choice. So you only get to vote for the two candidates they offer you, both of whom they own outright. If you knew the full story of how Ron Paul was prevented from being on the ballot, you would understand. Even with two candidates, the election is rigged so that it does not matter much how you vote, though wild-card antics like Chad counting can upset the equation without angering Eurobosses. Here’s how, and why it relates:
In those days, I had already interviewed a man claiming a flight crewman of CIA’s Evergreen Airline had confessed details of a secret flight: Bill Clinton, George Bush, and others (not Perot) were flown to Europe to meet with Bilderbergers to decide who would be our next President, Clinton being the answer. The plane landed and taxied to the end of the runway, where other Bilderberger planes already sat waiting.
Everyone got onto the same plane for their meet after deciding who would be the new President, and then departed in reverse manner, never officially entering the country. While we cannot confirm if this is a true event, it would give Bush a motive for circumventing by directly usurping power through martial law to end the election process. But to declare it would require some kind of internal upheaval on a national scale. Could such be engineered, and yet not seem manufactured to anyone, especially the Bilderbergers?
Are the Rodney King and Dorner matters linked to a Martial Law plot?
Playing the rest of the black cards
The race card trick: beating King and getting video taped was the first step. King was the perfect choice: he not only had the same last name as Martin Luther, but when clean shaven, he looked much like the much missed, martyred man. Beat King with video documentation, and you get instant renewed martyrdom, and kindle angst anew nation-wide in the black and white populace alike. But good quality video at night in those days was not as easy as it is, today.
The high-tech (for the day) Sony camera used had just been purchased and was taken right out of the box for the first time that night in response to the beating, it was claimed. I say claimed, because right out of the box, the battery would have been useless. The person filming was a Canadian-born contractor who had been raised in Argentina. You know, that country where the Nazi’s went after WWII, and where George Bush has bought huge tracts of land, and a fun place known to be a CIA playground in South America.
The second was to make sure the verdict in the trial was ‘not guilty.’ That was arranged by: a) having the first judge removed from the case as ‘biased,’ and b) the new judge assigned changing the venue to an all-White, well-to-do community resulting in a jury of 10 Whites and one Hispanic. But how do you make sure the violence level upon such verdict is sufficient enough to warrant calling in the National Guard? Simple — step c) have the National Guard foment violence to prime the pump. False flag stuff. Military stuff. CIA stuff. Any sign of that in LA at the time?
Well, as Dorner himself also mentions, we had for Chief of Police in LA at the time one Daryl F. Gates, clearly a New World Order Police State mentality kind of guy. He virtually invented SWAT teams and Police intelligence operations involved in wholesale spying on civilians. He also pioneered ‘sweeps’ of up to 1,000 officers at a time to arrest and detain everyone of a given class (e.g., 25,000 black and Hispanic youths, known or suspected gang members) simply for the harassment value, and to keep them off the streets for the convenience of city public relations, such as employed during the 1984 Olympic games.
The spying operation did favors directly for CIA fronts, while other police operations, including drug enforcement programs ‘invented’ by Gates (CRASH) made themselves useful to sanctioned CIA drug running in LA County. Ask ex LAPD Officer Michael Ruppert, who has been trying to blow the whistle on CIA drug operations in America ever since he was approached by CIA for the purpose of recruitment while on the Force. Ruppert thinks Gates was a CIA Case Officer, a CIA in place asset.
We should mention Gate’s role in the CIA mind-control assassination plot against RFK, where Gates ordered key evidence destroyed because ‘it was taking up too much room, and an ex-CIA Cop in the Command Center under Gates, ordered Cops not to go after the Man and his associate, the Woman in the polka dot dress seen earlier with Sirhan, and later seen running away gleefully saying “We did it! We shot Kennedy!” At the time, he said, “We don’t want them to get anything started on a big conspiracy.”
So then, was there any false flag ‘stuff’ of the sort going on in the LA Riots? In Fatal Rebirth, I detail some little known facts which national media censored, but which was revealed in local news reports. Things like someone parking an unlocked railroad box car full of guns on a siding near the LA Watts black community, and even helicopters dropping guns like they were beaded necklaces at Mardi Gras; like staging a violent attack on whites by blacks and videotaping it for news use… the participants other than victims later identified as National Guard in civies; like four black men caught by Police driving around town with a car full of guns and Molotov Cocktails, later released to a National Guard Major who claimed they were his Men. Here is a bit of a taste; guns appearing out of nowhere, a first-hand account.
Is Dorner intended to spark race riots to allow Martial Law?
To triumph, play the trump Ace
So one question which arises is, was Dorner to become the ‘Ace of Spades’ (the basis of my artwork) in some delayed completion of the Martial Law scenario by the military? Is some future revelation planned which will show him to have been framed and then murdered by LAPD, a tactic seeking to rekindle the 1992 hatreds all over again?
Keep in mind that in preceding months, there have been, and continue to be, a rash of massive live-fire (blanks) military Special Ops raid training exercises conducted in downtown Houston, LA, Minneapolis, Boston, Miami, and elsewhere (YouTube is rife with videos). Not once did city officials get advance warning, causing panicked civilians, some of whom took up arms just in case they would need defend themselves from (someone).
And, also in the weeks prior, the US Army leveled the 43 Acre Sepluveda Basin Wild Life Preserve (home to 250 species of birds) belonging to Los Angeles City WITHOUT NOTIFYING ANYONE. And as I write this, reports continue to come in of whole trains, as well as convoys of trucks carrying military vehicles along I-40 to Los Angeles. Someone is getting ready for something centered around LA.
But in truth, I rank its being tied to Dorner as being lower in likelihood than Chinese invasion or other, more useful martial law scenarios such as pandemics, nuclear or bioterrorism, etc. It might even be easier to stage an alien invasion, given that DARPA has developed huge stealth (radar absorbing, visually hard to see, soundless) UFO-like craft which have been test flown and sparked UFO flaps, already. So why go to the trouble of trying again something which didn’t work well in 1992?
A little more likely: something redacted from Dorner’s list of LAPD sins
If we presume that the Dorner’s material was altered, it is reasonable to presume something was removed. Something so dangerous if made public, that it was worth killing for, and framing Dorner to silence him. Imagine for a moment, that the people ‘killed by Dorner’ were people who also knew too much or who were considered weak links in a conspiracy. Or, some of them, perhaps even all, may have simply been targets of convenience because they were mentioned in Dorner’s complaints against LAPD.
Monica Quan was the daughter of LAPD Capt. Randal Quan, ret., who represented Dorner unsuccessfully (and poorly, according to the Manifesto) in hearings which resulted in Dorner’s termination from LAPD. Both Monica and her fiancé, were found shot dead in their car parked at their shared condo address. What if someone feared that Randal Quan might have shared some secret with her? Might that have resulted in targeting her, and the boyfriend in case she had in turn shared it with him?
Within minutes of the shooting by some accounts, the ‘manifesto’ was posted on Facebook, though not discovered for many hours. Open and shut case, right? But think about it. If you were going to launch a killing spree against cops… how much advance notice and tactical warning would you give them? Dorner’s alleged post included excruciating details of the threat and methods he would employ. And then, there was silence for four days, giving Police ample time to put investigative resources in motion, and putting Dorner at risk of capture. How logical was that, tactically, if how it really went down? It makes no sense.
On the fourth day, a gun battle ensued when two LAPD claim they spotted Dorner near the home of someone named in the post as likely target. One of the two Cops was grazed, but their suspect escaped. But how likely is it that it really was Dorner, given that a total of seven people known not to be Dorner were shot at by spooked Cops thinking them to be? We are talking about Cops opening fire without warning and shooting people clearly not Dorner — in the back in some cases. Dorner is a huge black man. So why shoot two Hispanic women, a slightly built white male, and a young surfer dude? Clearly, they had no real clue what Dorner looked like, then. So I must ask, did they really know it was him in that first gun battle?
Then, that same day, a SWAT Team Officer, Michael Crain, also a bad Cop according to Dorner, was shot dead, and a trainee with him critically wounded while they waited at a stoplight — attacked by someone who ran up to the car on foot. A bit curious to me that everyone killed by ‘Dorner’ died in the front seat of their car… which means someone was waiting for them at exactly the right place and time for a quick hit and run operation.
That requires exceedingly good intelligence and access to very detailed and current internal Police information in the case of Crain. I don’t believe Dorner, an ex Cop, would have that level of needed information available. Do you? It may be helpful to know that one of the favorite assassination points for CIA hits is while the target is in transit by car. Funny thing is, though, it takes CIA-style tricks to insure that a target will stop at the one stop light you deem most useful for the hit. That means more than one person is involved. Are we to believe Dorner pulled the feat off single-handedly, or would an internal conspiracy be more probable?
And who is Crain? An ex-Marine. Dorner is ex Navy, thanks to his problems with LAPD. But while he was still a Cop and in the Naval Reserves, both would likely have been ‘in the loop’ with respect to any illegal or paralegal joint military-police drills of the type mentioned above. And, therefore, we may presume both might have known something about an illegal future operation, or some dark matter associated with one already conducted. So how far fetched would it be for one to be killed to silence them and the other to be blamed for it, and to modify Dorner’s texts for the purpose?
It’s almost guaranteed to work, especially if the first killing is scheduled at a time when Dorner would have no alibi he could prove, such as being home, alone. Imagine being Dorner: you hear on the radio of the Quan shooting, and realize… ‘My FB page mentions the elder Quan in a bad light. That may make me a suspect. I’d better review my wording.’ So you try to do just that and discover you are locked out of your own account, and you recall your Credit Union account was hacked by an LAPD Officer once, already. So you just go to the page and find your list of complaints has suddenly become a confession (manifesto). You have no choice but to run, knowing Cops kill Cop killers almost always, no questions asked.
Especially run when you hear news reports that: a) some of your personal Police equipment was been found in a trash bin near the murder scene; and b) someone claiming to be you called Randall Quan to mentally torture him over Monica’s murder. And, thereby, unfolds the story we have been fed in media. But as we’ve seen, there has to be more at work here than that.
If the Dorner manifesto is a fraud, what can be believe about the official story?
Next up: 12 Frightening New Questions Illuminate the Dorner Urban Legend
Will America survive Chris Dorner?
- Dorners ‘Manifesto’: Manufacturing a D.B. Cooper-ish Urban Legend? (proparanoid.wordpress.com)
- 5 ways the Rodney King beating and LA riots changed america (CNN Editorial)
- How not to quell riots: Los Angeles-1992 (faroutliers.blogspot.com)
Dorners ‘Manifesto’: Manufacturing a D.B. Cooper-ish Urban Legend?
What would it mean if the Dorner ‘Manifesto’ was not written by him? What if he were deliberately being made into an urban legend to cover up crimes by the real authors, including Dorner’s murder before the Cabin assault even took place?By H. Michael Sweeney, copyright © 2013, all rights reserved, proparanoid.wordpress.com Permission to duplicate online hereby granted provided it is reproduced in full with all links and text colors in tact and unaltered, including this notice.
What you will learn reading this post:• There are many clues which make it doubtful that Dorner is the sole author, such as… • there are three distinctly different writing styles, typically standing out as if additions after the fact inconsistent with and reversing the intent of material clearly Dorner’s; • there are past tense and third-person references to Dorner as if already dead, and implied future tense when relating to the murders Dorner allegedly committed; • there are clever tricks designed to paint Dorner ‘mad’ which not even a crazy person would be fool enough to write.
Was Dorner framed? Who wrote Dorner’s manifesto? Was dormer killed and his body put in the cabin?
I must say that when I first heard reports about the Dorner incident, each update simply seemed more and more… unbelievable. Increasingly, the possibility grew in my mind that it was a set up. I mean, you have a good, moral cop fighting a just cause against corrupt, brutal, and racist cops harming citizens, and then he’s suddenly a crazed killer destroying the very foundation of his case by brutally murdering a minority citizen… not to mention cops? And everyone signs off. Please.
That’s just as believable as conveniently finding known terrorist’s wallets with their real identities, not alias’ commonly used as a cover, among the ashes in attacks where the largest thing otherwise remaining was a mote of ash. They’ve pulled that one on us three times that I know of, including Sept. 11 attacks. No false flag here… move along, move along.
But wait! They’ve found Dormer’s wallet repleat with readable plastic ID, where? The ashes of the burned-to-the-foundation cabin? AND, they found them at the Mexican border just hours earlier? No conspiracy here… move along, move along.
The only way I could justify the actions claimed of Dorner in my mind was if it were yet another ‘mass shooting’ event sparked by psychotropic SSRI drugs of the likes of Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, and others. These killer-makers all have murder and other violence as unpredictable side effects, and have been found to be in use by virtually all mass shooters. Ban guns? No thank you, but please, ban SSRIs and zany brain Witch Doctors who keep inventing new reasons to prescribe them like candy. Check out the facts and how SSRIs have bearing on the matter.
Sure. If Dorner was suffering depression, stress, and daily anxiety that he might be shot dead by dirty cops for ‘crossing the Blue Line,’ he might have been prescribed SSRIs for cause. But I doubt it. Because consistently co-present with the violent side effects is a lack of reason, logic, motive, or even an understanding of why they undertook violent acts, or even clear recall of them. Dorner, in his ‘manifesto,’ not only remembers, but screams a reason, motive, and understanding — flawed thinking though it be. But then, there are problems with the validity of that document… I don’t think he is the sole author.
Was Dorner framed? Who wrote Dorner’s manifesto? Was dormer killed and his body put in the cabin?
A manifesto which is not a Manifesto
Trotted out was the alleged Manifesto, which is in this case is really nothing more than a dumb-you-down term used much the same way the Davidian ranch at Waco and Randy Weaver’s log cabin were variously called an ‘enclave,’ a ‘fortress,’ or a ‘compound,’ all implying military defensive planning in their design. Propaganda BS. Reading Dorner’s work (uncensored version), you find there is no Manifesto present, at all.
No. Instead, it seems like five distinctly different texts in three differing styles as if by three different persons, and for four different purposes, not counting some political sandbagging and blindsiding thrown in for good measure. If you take away the things which seem added, all you have remaining is a plea for LAPD to do the right thing about a laundry list of wrongdoing.
1) The main body, which accounts for the bulk of the 18 page document is a detailed review of crimes and abuse of power of LAPD Officers, leadership, and events relating to Dorner’s whistleblowing and the resulting harassment and cover up — an event log. There is reason, calm, logic, and moral dignity present, and cohesive writing style. Clearly, it is the Dorner who fits the profile of a good cop and who is in control of himself. No Manifesto, it is merely a point-by-point, blow-by-blow accounting of his experiences trying to be that good Cop.
2) The introduction paragraph, on the other hand, is something else: a ‘confession’ of the murders and what sounds like an attempt to ‘excuse’ them by virtue of righteous indignation forcing acts of extreme violence as a “Last Resort,” which is indeed the title line. But were these things added later by someone else?
Particularly problematic is the writing style of this large paragraph. It is like the 9-11 cell phone calls from hijacked planes where callers spoke in ways no one ever does, revealing the calls were staged: “Hi, this is Mark Phillips, your son.” Would not a Mom know her own son, and their family’s last name? Interesting, especially since cell phones in those days did not work at altitude.
In the ‘manifesto,’ we read what seems like someone else trying to make you think them Dorner. Why would you write about yourself the way others describe you when you are not around, and generally only at your funeral service or on a death bed — in past tense?
Example a): “…completely out of character for the man you KNEW who always wore a smile wherever he WAS seen.”
Even if one actually believed that’s how people saw them, would they not more likely in such a case say; “… out of character for someone who always tries to wear a smile…” or “known for always wearing a smile…”?
Example b): “I know most of you who personally know me are in disbelief to hear from media reports that I am SUSPECTED of committing such horrendous murders…”
Why not simply say “…disbelief that I murdered anyone…”? And why even bring up media at all, especially via the expression, ‘media reports’? If I were going to say it at all, I’d simply say ‘on the news,’ but it is entirely superfluous given its assumed they had to know by one means or another… unless one is writing in knowledge that there WILL BE breaking news, and that writer is used to describing news as ‘media reports.’ That is exactly the way Cops and others who must at times cite news sources, including myself, would be used to saying it. Its use implies a different writer, one with foreknowledge of future events. Sure, Dorner is also a Cop, so he might write it that way, too, except that…
In like manner, the choice of the word ‘suspected.’ If you know you did it and are taking credit there on the spot, why use that word at all.
If written instead by another Cop framing Dorner, that Cop would be so used to referring to third-parties as suspects, and expressing ‘facts’ in certain ways, that it could have easily crept into typed text without notice. Someone writing about their own actions is not so moved. These are not the only instances, and more to the point, they only exist in select parts of the text, nowhere in what appears to be the main body (next three items) clearly written by Dorner.
3) In the middle of the main body, the accusations against LAPD, we find a curious out-of-place section, a very large paragraph, of zero relevance asking journalists to review his school years (he lists towns he lived in) to show he was never a bully or got into fights. And yet, the same paragraph describes an incident with him throwing the first and only punch and getting punished, and about continually earning more such punishments thereafter. Excuse me? It is as if someone wanted journalists to deduce the opposite of what the paragraph claims to want, and deem him not only violent minded, but mentally incompetent and unable to distinguish between the two states of being. It had to have been ADDED to get there in the middle, given a lack of context to prior or following material.
4) The passage is one of only two sections, which use profanity. It is also the one place where he derides Christianity and claims not to be a Christian, though elsewhere he presents his morals in very Christian terms. Now, I’ve read many documents similar in nature where the author was non Christian, and they made negative comments at every opportunity, not at just one point.. So I must ask:
Could this section have been inserted, and ‘addressed’ to journalists because, a few paragraphs later, Dorner also asks in the main body that journalists review a particular set of events and specific records which validate his LAPD accusations? By sounding completely bonkers and self contradictory in the first request, the second request would likely be ignored as well. This is essentially the whole de facto effect (and purpose?) of the entire ‘manifesto.’ It screams ‘ignore anything I say or complain about, because I do the opposite of what I say and am worse than those I complain about.’
Funny thing is… the nature of sociopathic and psychopathic behavior specifically includes the ability to well hide it, rather than to reveal it unknowingly — which requires them to be immune from doxastic self deception (i.e., saying you do not get into fights, then citing fights, and not sensing the paradox). Someone deliberately created that paradoxical paragraph.
5) From that point forward, it seems as if almost every paragraph of the remaining main body text has at least one sentence, or even a whole paragraph (added?) which tends to convert it from a rational, non threatening letter into a reprehensible, irrational threat. You literally feel the tone change between what came before, and the additions. I get the distinct impression someone started by adding the final section (described next) at the bottom of the document, and then worked their way up paragraph by paragraph, editing for an I-am-a-mad-man-so-kill-me-quick effect, and stopped with the middle insert we just reviewed. Save original passages, most are tacked onto the end, because that’s the easiest thing to do, and they are often very simple, short one liners — but an original writer would tend to include such key elements throughout the dialog and thoughtfully so.
Example a) I have exhausted all available means at obtaining my name back. I have attempted all legal court efforts within appeals at the Superior Courts and California Appellate courts. This is my last resort. The LAPD has suppressed the truth and it has now lead to deadly consequences. The LAPD’s actions have cost me my law enforcement career that began on 2/7/05 and ended on 1/2/09. They cost me my Naval career which started on 4/02 and ends on 2/13. I had a TS/SCI clearance(Top Secret Sensitive Compartmentalized Information clearance) up until shortly after my termination with LAPD. This is the highest clearance a service member can attain other than a Yankee White TS/SCI which is only granted for those working with and around the President/Vice President of the United States. I lost my position as a Commanding Officer of a Naval Security Forces reserve unit at NAS Fallon because of the LAPD. I’ve lost a relationship with my mother and sister because of the LAPD. I’ve lost a relationship with close friends because of the LAPD. In essence, I’ve lost everything because the LAPD took my name and new I was INNOCENT!!! Capt Phil Tingirides, Justin Eisenberg, Martella, Randy Quan, and Sgt. Anderson all new I was innocent but decided to terminate me so they could continue Ofcr. Teresa Evans career. I know about the meeting between all of you where Evans attorney, Rico, confessed that she kicked Christopher Gettler (excessive force). Your day has come.
Example b) Chief Beck, this is when you need to have that come to Jesus talk with Sgt. Teresa Evans and everyone else who was involved in the conspiracy to have me terminated for doing the right thing. you also need to speak with her attorney, Rico, and his conversation with the BOR members and her confession of guilt in kicking Mr. Gettler. I’ll be waiting for a PUBLIC response at a press conference. When the truth comes out, the killing stops.
Example c): Those Hispanic officers who victimize their own ethnicity because they are new immigrants to this country and are unaware of their civil rights. You call them wetbacks to their face and demean them in front of fellow officers of different ethnicities so that you will receive some sort of acceptance from your colleagues. I’m not impressed. Most likely, your parents or grandparents were immigrants at one time, but you have forgotten that. You are a high value target.
6) The next, closing section is a long list of ranting which, along with a concentration of profanity, is a bit of a grab bag. It is unusual in that it has countless little paragraphs aimed at a wide variety of public figures in a bouncy mixture of complaints and praise which render the writer a loon. Also in the section is a kind of long train wreck of a letter to LAPD, with dire warnings of impending violence towards other cops and their families. Much of the letter portion, if one again discounted sentences and portions which might have been added to flip meaning, may indeed have been written by a sane Dorner, a genuine plea to do the right thing, with additions again subverting them into threats. That is not how threatening people write. The nastiness is pervasive, not tacked on neatly. Sans such additions, it is no longer a train wreck, nor rambling.
7) These added things tend to be in the same style otherwise questioned in the opening examples, but with more Angst and vileness.
Example (not a typo by me) regarding killing cops; It was against everything I’ve ever was.
Wait a minute. There is a difference between me writing about me; “It was against everything I’ve ever been,” or about someone else; “It was against everything he ever was.” Those are the only two possible original sentences. Either there was a super-nova brain fart, or a partial correction was made to the later sentence. Let me explain.
Imagine someone other the Dorner subliminally mixing thought states from first to third person as well as from relating life experience of the living to past experiences before one’s death. So ingrained as natural to repetitive writing about third parties (in Police reports?), perhaps, that only a partial editing correction (‘he’ to ‘I’ve) was made, the writer still not catching the tell-tale ‘was.’ Either or both reasons for the error make it someone other than Dorner doing the writing, and further implies Dorner already dead, or sure knowledge he was to be, soon.
8) Nothing in the document would convince you Dorner was crazy as much as does the letter component. When I say rambling, I mean a completely different visible style of sentence structure (or lack thereof), with gross errors not common to the main body. Among them, are incomplete or nonsense sentences, such as the very last one, “We need to hold ou” What? The Cops were at the door and he had to stop mid-sentence and fetch some beers? And yet, again, these sentences/passages are mixed in as if additions to existent, logical, well written material. Take them away, and it suddenly seems normal.
9) And what about depression? He ‘admits’ suffering from it in the letter part. Funny thing about that is, it always seems officials in questionable deaths of the politically incorrect find a way to say ‘We had indications he was depressed…’ when they ‘suicide.’ Perhaps, but that still only accounts for the murders if he was on psychotropics, for which nothing else matches the symptoms, and still leaves the document flawed in its present construct.
10) But also in the section is a very long rambling bit which seems to be there only to serve gun grabber needs, and given that Dorner is (allegedly) now one of the ‘mass shooters’ of late, we can expect it to be one more log on the fire in that debate. How convenient.
But, uh… what should we expect, given that the section also praises the likes of both Clintons and Sr. Bush, as well as CIA’s (or Mossad’s) journalists of choice (links reveal), Walter Cronkite (Who wrote this? WC retired when Dorner was three years old!), Peter + Jennings, Anderson Cooper, and Wolf Blitzer, et. al? A Globalist’s Cop who likes a controlled media — who owns all manner of firearms, which he lists, and yet wishes were banned, and which are on Feinstein’s list, too? Please. No propaganda here, move along…
Was Dorner framed? Who wrote Dorner’s manifesto? Was dormer killed and his body put in the cabin?
Given the dichotomy and logic and style flipping content overall, one might choose to toss off the concerns I’ve stated and to instead presume it at simple face value as the work of a lunatic. Heaven knows media is accepting it, so why shouldn’t we? We will actually answer that question, in another blog in this series.
For me, because there is no hint of a specific or consistent lunacy… because nothing in the document as it sits should make any sense even to a deluded writer… because of the clues of alternate author additions cited… we might do well to question authenticity. If NOT authentic, then there is a conspiracy, and nothing we’ve heard about any event related to the matter can be trusted to be true. So, presuming there is a motive to decieve, is there anything suggesting means and opportunity, for someone to make such changes to Dorner’s words? Lets ask a couple of key questions which address that:
1) Where did the ‘manifesto’ come from? Answer, from a Facebook page the LA Times describes as “believed to be Dorner’s.” Huh? Three problems with that:
a) wishy-washy ‘believed to be,’ makes me wonder all the more about authenticity. I have doubts, because…
b) anyone can get a Facebook account in any name they want not already taken, and…
c) anyone who has ever had a FB account should know how easy they are to be hijacked, hacked, or accessed and manipulated by unauthorized users via password cracking. Ergo, next question…
2) How secure were Dorner’s computers and access to his Web accounts? Answer, from his own documentation of LAPD targeting for being a whistleblower; Thaniya Sungruenyos, an LAPD Officer had hacked his Los Angeles Police Federal Credit Union account from her home address, per the IP address provided by the Financial institution. LAPD ignored the evidence and covered up the event, according to Dorner.
Interesting what you can learn, when you question the official line and look more closely. Seen anyone in media following suit? No? Well, that leaves just you and me conspiracy theorists, I guess. But then, there are other people who wonder, too. Check out the last two related articles about Dorner, one of them a Police Chief.
What is the truth about Chris Dorner?
Next up: Dorner, the Urban Legend: Implications Behind a Fraudulent Manifesto
Is Dorner really dead?
- LAPD’s indefensible Dorner pursuit (salon.com)
- Some Minorities Sympathize With Cop Killer’s Frustration, But Disavow Murder Spree (huffingtonpost.com)
- Police in California are so scared they are shooting at anyone they see in blue Nissan truck (dailypaul.com)
- My Friend, Chris Dorner (buzzfeed.com)
- Police chief recalls ‘the Chris Dorner that I knew’ (usnews.nbcnews.com)