Emergency Post: BLM vs. Bundy is an Ominous Danger
It is seen by government as a win-win ploy that raises the stakes to unimaginable levels. What we see on the surface has nothing to do with the sinister plot which it enables and portends. This is our last and only chance to save the country, or loose it to tyranny forever, and rush toward Earth’s final demise.
Will Bundy vs. BLM start Revolution 2.0?
By H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com proparanoidpress.com proparanoid.net
copyright © 2014, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Please comment any such repost to original posting.
What is going on in Nevada with the BLM?
What you will learn reading this post…• government’s actions against Bundy are mere window dressing — something more sinister is afoot; • the stakes are incredibly high, but hard to see — your very life and the fate of the World, in fact; • there is only one logical solution, and everyone plays a role. What can I do to help Bundy against the BLM?
Why BLM vs. Bundy matters regardless of if his cause is just or he has no legal leg to stand on
UPDATE: Same day posted… Oh, so now we find out its really for the oil companies? What Corporate Police State? BLM sells 29 oil, gas leases in northeast Nevada End update.
Government made it matter, and with dark purpose. At one glance it is an effort to usurp power over people, and the States, as well as to empower corporate ranching over private ranchers. It is a form of unfair and excessive taxation without representation against a political enemy of financial convenience to friends of the White House. And, it is an opportunity to make yet one more National Police Force out of the BLM. But, thanks to controlled media/government PR, not everyone sees these points of view.
But even that view is incomplete and misses the mark, if we but look closer. It is a deliberate series of escalations by government over time to garner public attention among and inflame we select people (why it gets little due mainstream coverage — save that which slants as it did at Ruby Ridge and Waco). They know the Web will be awash in the circles of we Patriots, Constitutionalists, Activists, and others who oppose the tyranny and oppression our government has come to represent since 9-11. The Sheeple must not be unduly disturbed until it can have false flag impact of calculated value.
I talk a lot about the need for citizens to draw lines in the sand and be willing to become Minuitmen should such lines be crossed. Now comes government to draw it for us, I write here to tell you that you have no choice but accept the challenge, and act decisively. You may perish either way, but I’d rather perish attempting to control my life and future than to leave it to others less kindly inclined to favor me. If there is to be armed revolution, let it be on our terms, not theirs.
Why so conclude? Because if they work it right, the ‘standoff gone wrong’ is a perfect chance to justify taking guns. By forcing a showdown and a gunfight (what the snipers do best – there is no justification for government deploying snipers unless for this cause, AND to selectively inflame those who stand for Liberty and who remember Ruby Ridge). There are two possible ends, of course, though I think they will insure BOTH transpire.
Regardless, such a battle is win-win for government. The “poor defensless BLM armed only with tasers,’ if loosing large numbers will be seen by Sheeple as an outrage, and given that Militia were involved from multiple quarters, and other armed parties, Obama can order Martial Law with suspension of the Constitution. Especially if also employing agent provocateurs for local violence across the country, as was employed in the LA Riots, where National Guardsmen posed as rioters to prime the pump. This would likely result in orders for the military and Police to go door-t0-door. Who knows, Obama might even order the U.N. in as long-feared and first promoted as concept by Henry Kissinger. Or, he might simply order in the military; A-10s, attack choppers, a Stryker Battalion, and so forth.
They can then conveniently ‘quash armed rebels and terrorists,’ confiscate all guns, round up dissidents and politically incorrect opponents (like you and me — why they have been spying on us so earnestly), and hold a Con Con (they are already staging for it) to pass the Constitution of the NewStates of America, already written, which essentially enables the formation of the North American Union and surrender of US sovereignty to the U.N. in stages. All of this leads, of course, to a one-World Government (that Constitution has also already been written), and provides a single seat of power to enable the Antichrist’s coming to power.Note: The NewStates Constitution is reprinted in my booklet, Fatal Rebirth, along with the World Constitution, complete with analysis line by line (NewStates) to show how draconian a document it really is. Rights become privileges which can be revoked at any time by any agency or party of government for any cause, even retroactively, and almost anyone in government can write law, and again, it can be retroactive. And if you think the two-party system and the FED/IRS is bad, wait until you see what follows. You can request a free copy of the ebook version of Vol I of Fatal Rebirth by email request to pppbooks at comcast net.
THAT is what is at stake. Nothing less than EVERYTHING!
So we must be decisive: regardless of how we view Bundy’s cause or government’s viewpoint, regardless of if an armed and concerned citizen or a dumbed down Sheeple, we all have equal stake in this unfolding globalist tragedy. And, we can all play a role no matter our status, and regardless of if present in Nevada, or not. But about that decisive action…
Why is the BLM standoff against Bundy in Nevada taking place?
What we should prefer…
Should we stand up with arms in hand and enable, if not force, the ultimate showdown? I fear this is exactly what government wants, as already stated. But there is another, wiser choice.
By all means, men of arms should rally, but standing firm and waiting for the other side to blink or blunder is a fool’s plan, and it can only end in bloodshed. What must be done is that which can neuter Government’s ploy. And only one set of steps can do that:
a) anyone and everyone should file court actions against any and every agency, branch, and individual of government involved at every level of government. Any and every cause, grievance, or objection, as allowed by and based on State, County, and Federal Law, and the Constitution and Bill of Rights, should be employed. Bury them in legal actions, EACH OF WHICH includes request for either an Injunction or Stay Order. These actions should not all be done at once, but the flood should be continuous, so that new ones can replace those quickly disposed of. THIS BUYS TIME;
b) time is our friend — it generates awareness and understanding. It buys media attention and gives Sheeple a chance to better understand what is taking place. Just as the 99% movement could no longer be contained by a controlled media, so must this matter be brought into every home. Invite major networks, espcially foreign press, to specifically include RT, to set up broadcast facilities right on the Bundy Ranch, and bypassing the see nothing viewpoints established by government for controlling media in the manner done at WACO (NEVER AGAIN!). Install microwave and shortwave communication systems for the purpose. But also, LOCAL media is the key, as is the WWW; do not rely upon mainstream. Militia and other group ‘spokespersons’ in your community should approach their local news sources with proposed interviews to get the word out. IF EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS WHAT IS TRULY AT STAKE, AND TAKING PLACE, GOVERNMENT’S PLOT IS UNDERMINED AND THEY LOOSE THE SHEEPLE;
c) flood the theater with actors. There should be so many people there is not enough room in the minimal areas intended to contain them. OVERFLOW. The ‘1st Amendment’ area, itself an affront to the Constitution, and should be enlarged and enlarged again, forcing retreat or conflict which will make news favorable to our side. If you have access to a professional camera, start a ‘newspaper’ or ‘Radio station’ and flood the press area and make it overflow, as well. And Bundy’s ranch should become a city of tents, and include as many unarmed persons as possible who wield nothing but baseball bats or the proverbial pitchfork. THIS MAKES THE WHOLE AFFAIR MORE VISIBLE and LESS TENABLE TO GOVERNMENT’S GOALS;
d) involve the local Sheriff and State/County Officials. The Sheriff has effectively stated a hands-off non intervention policy. Fine. Perhaps he is a puppet put into place for the purpose, or co opted by any number of means available to government for rendering him neutral. But the flurry of legal actions should be intended to FORCE HIM to intervene on behalf of Bundy and supporters. If nothing else, he should have a presence on the Ranch to insure armed groups behave (public safety). The Governor and Legislators, and County Officials should called to DEMAND it. Perhaps even the National Guard should be called to stand by. A simple invite, if not enough, can be followed by a media blitz and public demand that such action is needed. Any politically motivated decision to remain neutral should be negated, thereby; a political suicide. INVOLVE THE SHERIFF, as WITNESS and PEACEKEEPER;
e) party! No alcohol or drugs, but good cheer, song and dance. Use loudspeakers. Mix well with speeches and ‘town hall’ dialogs. Use the platform (the nation will be watching) to air ALL GRIEVANCES with government, not just this ONE issue. Give voice to the rest of the 99% in a way that movement never was able to achieve on its own. SOROS WILL HAVE NO VOICE, this time;
e) prepare for Martial Law at home. That means emergency kits and plans (like the one government would not approve). It means weapons. If it is declared, you will have scant few hours to choose to fight, run, or to surrender to your fate at the hands of tyranny. If not taken away, you will need to survive for months without anything like normal civilization. No key resource, including electrical power or communication, can be assured, and will likely be withheld on purpose. Travel will be restricted and many will not be able to work, and there is no shopping, only rationing. BE READY TO BE SELF RELIANT, BE READY TO FIGHT IF THAT IS WHAT IT COMES DOWN TO;
f) if and when the shooting starts, DO NOT ENGAGE! Dead BLM or other Agents will be made into martyrs by mainstream. DO NOT GIVE THEM WHAT THEY WANT. Show restraint, and let the casualties be on your side. Keep putting out a continuous feed of information and video so that media and the WWW know what is going on. IF THERE ARE TO BE MARTYRS, LET THEM BE OUR OWN, and LET IT BE TELEVISED LIVE. If a full-scale armed revolt spontaneously errupts nation-wide, then by all means, defend yourself at the Ranch, and FOLLOW YOUR CONSIENCE AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION.
g) petition for redress. Redress of grievances is a key component of our Nation’s Constitutional form of government (this post makes clear, mid post). When it fails, we have no government, only tyranny. It seems today there is NO REDRESS POSSIBLE at the Federal level. ONLY THE STATES stand in the way of total Federal domination, which is part of what this whole affair is about; a means to increase Federal power over the States. But while all this is going on… and while we have media platforms established… we should be seeking redress through our State Legislators, making a series of calls for action to quickly pass laws which…
1) nullify all Federal gun laws, NDAA, NSA surveillance, and forbid Federal drone overflights except under warrant and oversight by State authorities;
2) eliminate Federal arrest and warrant power. If a Federal judge issues a warrant, or an Agency is moved to move against a party (like Bundy), they must instead go to the appropriate local Law Enforcement Agency and have them execute on their behalf. They may go along, but as observers, ONLY;
3) make clear a mandate that your State shall NOT approve a new Consitution if a Con Con is held, nor the removal or neutering by Amendment of the current Constitution, and any existing Federal Law which does so should be nullified;
4) add freely to this list anything which addresses abuse of power by the Federal government, such as militarization of Police, Obamacare, etc. This will be your one best chance to spark public dialog and debate, and to make certain that people, and especially State Legislators, realize THEY are the ones with the real power, and the duty to protect freedom and force the Constitution.
What is at stake in Nevada and the BLM standoff with Bundy?
Government has drawn a line in the sand
Let’s make sure they regret it. Force them to be the ones to cross it, and let them trip over their own power play. Now… go forth and spread the word.
1776 2.0 Cometh: What Price Treason, and Who Pays?
Gun Control Laws and other Constitutional/Bill of Rights erosions by government are TREASON. Ultimately, YOU decide who is going to pay, and how.1776 2.0 Cometh by H. Michael Sweeney copyright © 2013, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this paragraph, are included. Compare 1776 to 2012 and tell me where you live
What is the price of treason, and who pays?
Historically, the price of Treason can be unbearably high. If caught and convicted, the price can be as high as death, typically by hanging or by firing squad. In time of war, especially, and if that war be a revolution to throw off a tyranny born of such treason, the death penalty is more oft employed. Therefore, only a fool undertakes treason lightly; those who accept such risk must have great personal gains as their motive, else why the gamble?
But the cost is also high if such tyranny is not overthrown. If one is subservient to it without protest, or resistance is beaten down by it, the cost is loss of all Freedom, and often, again… the loss of life itself. For when government gives unto itself absolute power, it is corrupted absolutely, and free to deem any person at will as unworthy of life simply because they are seen as an inconvenience to whatever drives their tyrannical agenda. Yes. An example is called for:
Today, the person acting as President, through the NDAA Act, has, in conspiracy with those who voted for the Bill, usurped the power to take life and liberty with just a word; the tyrannical power of a 12th century King. When any one man establishes by manipulative means the power of life and death over fellow men in deference to all existing law, it is a crime. Treason.
Alex Jones was right, gun control means 1776 all over again
A line in the sand: when is 1776, 2.0?
SOON, thanks to the push for gun control, when each of us must decide if we are subservient and wiling to be the ones to pay the price by giving up our rights as well as the means to insure them… or if we will instead assert our rights and throw off the yoke of fascist rule of the New World Order by defending our guns in resolute defiance BY RULE OF LAW; the Constitution’s Second Amendment. That’s what it is there, for — it is not there for Duck hunting rights. It is that we might always have available Minutemen, and all who are able ought serve.
Heed my words, for I have been warning of this moment in time for more than ten years, starting with my bookset, Fatal Rebirth.Note: Fatal Rebirth predicted Sept. 11 events in sponsorship of Middle East wars for oil. It predicted assassination plots against Ross Perot to kill the third party movement (indeed, mailed anthrax attack on his family would cause him to withdraw from the election the very night he would have won a place on the ballot and legitimized a third Populist political party). It predicted many things, including a series of mass shootings to enable gun control legislation. It also predicted the next wave of terror attacks, including likely locations and methods, as false flag ruse to declare Martial Law, suspend the Constitution, and go door-to-door to collect ‘contraband’ and discover ‘terrorists’ (after our guns, mostly). But it also predicted how to resist and overcome such tactics, with specific advice to the Militia and others wishing to resist. You can get a free copy of volume I ebook by email to pppress at century link net.
I’ve written many posts about the coming moment, too, best described as that critical moment when each of us must decide if a line in the sand has been crossed which cannot be tolerated. Some of these posts are listed below, others are linked within this text. In one, I put it this way: government plays Russian Roulette and puts a gun to their head every time they undertake an oppressive or unconstitutional act, and pulls the trigger at its signing into law.
Eventually, they will go too far, and it will be yet another shot heard around the World; 1776, once more. It is, after all, how revolutions are started. An attempt to seize and restrict gun ownership is that line in the sand which must not be crossed, even at risk of escalation to armed rebellion. It guarantees not just one shot, but many, many, many more immediately thereafter. Only a fool would fail to realize that if any such revolution comes, those who are deemed as traitors will find it was as if there was a de facto bounty upon their head.
And from the very beginning, at the time the Constitution was penned, and the Amendments thereof brought into being, Thomas Jefferson and his patriot fellows warned this would be so: “The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.”
That Jeffersonian comment underscores the reason for its existence, which has NOTHING to do with the right to hunt or protect us from criminals, but everything to do with being able to protect us from government run amok. Our government runs AMOK, NOW, and has for some time. Shame on YOU for allowing it to go this far! Shame on me and you if we do not at last toe that line in the sand, standing firmly, side by side.
Are mass shootings simply false flag operations to take guns?
Let us be clear: what defines treason?
Those in power define the answer, the wording of law not withstanding. I am likely now, or soon to be, like all dissenters, activists, and Constitutionalists, gun owners, and the like, as a single class targeted by a fascist coupe marching toward their New World Order, to be declared guilty of treason for daring to write these words. That’s the way Fascism works, and why no one is safe when it rules. But should 1776 revisit, and the People and Constitution win, WE will be the ones who define Treason. Here is my view of what that definition should be:
a) It is treason to swear an oath to uphold the Constitution while at the same time being a member of a New World Order institution which has their own oath to give up sovereignty in favor of a unified World government (which, ultimately, enables seating of the Antichrist). Therefore, a long list of governmentals are de facto traitors by virtue of lying when they gave their oath of office — while being members of the Tri-Lateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, the Council on Foreign Relations, Skull and Bones, or being a Rhodes Scholar, or similar.
These groups all require agreement to such contrary oaths or with stated globalist agenda, all of which is nothing less than rewording which conforms with the Illuminati formula for World domination, for which it was they who coined the term, New World Order. It is, today, very hard to find a Congressmen or other governmental who is not such a traitor, and the remainder look upon such groups as if wiser than their own ability to think for themselves, even to the point of accepting and acting upon their Globalist ‘reports’ as if Congressional findings. Treason.
b) It is treason to knowingly propose and vote for, and sign a Bill into law which is unconstitutional, or any Bill you have NOT READ and debated properly. Any act to subvert the Constitution, be it willful or by negligence, justifies the charge of treason, and let the defendant prove otherwise. Given that all such persons are educated in the law as a rule, one may safely presume there are no fools unaware of the significance, and the due seriousness with which their duties under their oaths of Office require of them to be diligent.
They undertook such acts at their own peril, and in full awareness of the responsibility to take care. So be it, when it comes time to answer for it. The list of such Bills is long, and many shall be held accountable. In fact, I can only think of two or three Congressionals who may be completely innocent, but there may, hopefully, be others. If not, perhaps the time for revolution is now.
c) To the point, here and now, today: ALL governmentals who support gun control laws which take away the right of the citizen to own military grade weapons are guilty of Treason. The Dick Act of 1902 made clear that the UNREGULATED MILITIA (that’s ANY citizen with a gun who stands to serve) shall NOT be denied the right to have military grade weapons. And yet, Congress has subverted this law time and again, by clever rewording of definitions, and the trickery of ‘dual oaths’ of service.
Therefore, all prior gun control laws which so inhibit access, or which create registration lists, are de facto null and void, and treasonous. Any attempt to collect weapons against the wishes of owners constitutes theft of private property on the one hand, and an attempted coupe on the other (treason), as does any attempt to prohibit or limit access, or to ‘register,’ anything with a Federal agency.Personally, I want my own SAM and Apache gunship, thank you. I want all gun control laws repealed. The only law which I would approve is that to purchase a weapon, you would need be an adult of sound mind, and with no criminal record, to be determined by a blanket background check where the purpose of application was unstated, but authorized by the person being checked, as all background checks should be. I only registration process should be to register guns, not owners: a registration process managed by the States which collects sample slugs from fired guns from sellers (the Registrars) for forensic comparisons in criminal matters. The State would not know who owned the gun, but if used in a crime, could obtain a warrant to get that information from the seller of the weapon. I further want colleges to offer firearms safety training courses as an alternative to ROTC, and as part of ROTC. I want every State to have at least one citizen militia not subject to State control, and I want the State to provide them with access to military training facilities and expertise. I want every citizen who is qualified to own to be able to open carry or conceal carry. In short, I want to reduce the likelihood of criminal use of guns by means of practical and immediate (real and clearly visible) deterrence. There are clearly other topics to be decided by law, such as matters of keeping guns away from unsupervised access by children, but I’m not taking up more space, here and now to totally define my views. If you want full details of how such a law could work, please request it directly and it will be made available by email.
d) All governmentals who supported NDAA are guilty of treason as well, for that law not only strips away whole sections of the Constitution, it even defeats the Magna Carta and gives the President the power of a 12th Century King to put citizens to death by mere say so (or torture or imprison them indefinitely without trial or evidence). Is that why DHS ordered 9,000,000 sniper rounds not for military use? That’s about how many dissidents there are in this country with a loud voice, such as myself, if I may be so bold.
e) All governmentals who support the DOD sending National Guard troops to war overseas without an Act of War and Congressional declaration of War are guilty of Treason. The Dick Act, again clearly denies the President or anyone else the power to order National Guard to active duty in any other fashion. They are NOT part of the regular Army subject to DOD. We have been fools to not be aware and hold both our STATE and Federal representatives accountable under the law their wiser forefathers set for them to follow.
f) All governmentals who support the endless spying and abuse of privacy of citizens at large in the name of fighting terrorism are guilty of treason, as are those involved in seeking the development and deployment of Political Control Technology (PCT) in like guise. Not only do they, and the 30,000 drones they want to put into our skies erode Constitutional rights and safeguards long cherished under the law, they make such protections meaningless. The very nature of PCT reveals their lust for totalitarian control.
Worse, they these things are a sham: they are not there because government fears a few thousand terrorists, but because government fears 360 million citizens, which is its RIGHTFUL state; the government is there to serve us at our pleasure, and be vanquished at our displeasure, not there to rule us at theirs, and subject to suffering their displeasure. Treason.
g) Any governmental who writes a law is also subject to the law, and thus any who violate the law and evade punishment by virtue of their power of office are guilty of treason. A government which violates its own law, as ours is so often guilty of doing, has no right to demand we obey their laws, doubly so when oppressive and unconstitutional. And doubly again when the person signing them into law cannot even prove citizenship to the simplest of standards. Such people make of The Law, something less, ‘the law,’ a mockery of no value whatsoever. I refuse to obey the law, but accept and follow only the Law of the Land (The Constitution)!
And let us not forget their oft cited caveat: we have recourse through the courts if we think a law unconstitutional. What recourse is that, really? When it can take a decade to work a suit through to the Supreme Court and cost millions of dollars, there is no recourse of practical meaning. When they can write new unconstitutional laws of like purpose ten times faster than we can negate an old one, there is is no recourse which excuses their writing them, and act of pure lust for power. Treason.
h) Media should never be allowed to be under control of the military-industrial-intelligence complex. It is so much under control, today, that I term it the Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Media (MIIM) Complex. When CIA puts thousands of operatives into media… when the top three TV networks are owned by military contractors (during the Flight 800 time frame, they were)… when a newspaper publishes the names of all gun owners and deliberately places their family, homes and the guns in danger… when ‘unafraid’ and ‘fair and balanced’ means ‘the truth is whatever government and globalists say happened, facts be damned,’ then those involved are guilty of Treason.
This list could be (should be) longer, but this is a blog and people don’t like them to be too long. So if they come for the guns and shooting breaks out, heaven help virtually any governmental captured, should the Constitutionalists and Patriots win out over ‘the law.’ So. Congress, and Mr. Obama, usurper King… spin the cylinder, put the gun to your head, and pull the trigger by signing that Bill. Let’s see who pays, and what the price shall be.
You know where I live, and many more like me. You have lists of gun owners through previously written gun laws which should never have been allowed. But every citizen knows where all of you are, too. You don’t have enough Men in Black to get the 9 million activists before the rest of us come after you in numbers you can’t stop. You certainly don’t have enough to go after all 300,000,000 guns we possess… or is that why DHS also ordered 4.2 billion rounds or regular bullets?
What will you do when they come to your door to search for guns?
Who controls gun rights?
It is not lawmakers in Washington, D.C., who write illegal (unconstitutional laws) on purpose. They control only their own fascist rhetoric. The framers of the Constitution, and that document, are the ONLY authority we need obey. Even if you do not own a gun, the weapon Washington fears is in your hands; they fear a united WE, the PEOPLE.
Ergo; to lawmakers and other power usurpers and their minions of enforcers who disobey their oaths of office: I dare you to try to take that weapon from our hands. Bring on 1776 2.0, if you must. Clint said it best. “Do you feel lucky, Punk?”
Well, do you, Punk?Note: the current proposed (Fascist Feinstein) gun law (clear analysis, here), will essentially force gun owners to give up the bulk of all pistols, rifles, and shotguns in a manner not unlike already undertaken in Australia. Those efforts resulted in a huge spike in gun violence as criminals were given a blank check knowing no citizen was protected by the likes of Mr. Smith and Wesson. We lost what? Well under 100 lives this last year to gun violence of the type the legislation claims to be defeating? Australia lost 93,000 lives to gun violence after confiscation, and their population is a mere fraction of our own. Yeah. Gun control works. It works for fascists and criminals (same thing, different levels of prowess and evil goals). Do not obey illegal laws. Challenge authority. Stand on your rights.
Related articles by me
- On Being Prepared for Martial Law or Revolution
- Portending Martial Law: Three Facts That Put You at Risk
- Raw Numbers Prove DHS Gearing Up For Martial Law, Revolution, or Chinese Invasion
- Compare 1776 to 2012 and Tell Me Where You THINK You Live…
- Statistics Prove Gun Control is No Solution; Gun Violence is a Political Ruse
- Mind-Controlled Mass Shootings Don’t Change My Mind
Related articles by others
- Petition to charge Sen. Feinstein with treason soars past White House threshold (rawstory.com)
- Gun control: The right to commit treason (richarddawkins.net)
- Gilberton Police Chief: Disarming Americans is Treason (sgtreport.com)
- No, ma’am (ireport.cnn.com) INCLUDES CNN’s inappropriate anti-gun commentary effort to defeat the impact of this Marine’s letter.
The Clackamas Town Center Shooter… me, my family, and friends
This one came closer than I’d like to those I love… and requires we make comparisons to Aurora.Permission to repost if in entirety with all links in tact and credit to author H. Michael Sweeney, and the original blog at proparanoid.wordpress.com Clackamas shooting compared to aurora shooting
Reading this post you will learn:
a) How the Clackamas shooting relates to me and people I love, personally
b) How it relates to the Aurora Century 21 shooting
c) That like Aurora, there are still mysteries and questions to be resolved
When the Mall finally reopened after the Police investigation, our family all went to the Mall and expressed our moral support. They had a nice Candle light vigil, and there was a group singing Christmas Carols. A lot of people had tears in their eyes, including me. We hung a Star on the tree in Memorial for victims and their families. I wrote simply, “Hope, Love, Faith, Life.”
I also recorded a music segment and sent it as a text message to a dozen people I thought would appreciate it. It ‘spoke’ volumes about coming together as a community and going forward under duress. But as it happens, this event was a bit closer to home, and some of my tears were not just for those reasons, but because of more personal details.
As an author and consultant on privacy and security matters, as well as abuse of power issues including crimes of the New World Order, I should be used to such nastiness by now. I’ve been involved with investigations or other direct confrontations resulting in capture and prosecution a whole range of bad guys, including going head-to-head with terrorists and dirty cops, with three and perhaps five attempts on my life for my trouble. Read about it.
But no. I’m not used to it.
My wife has come home to find Men in Black fleeing our home using walkie talkies. People have tried to break into our home while we slept three nights in a row, and they did eventually gain entrance while we were away and ‘did things.’ I could spend an hour telling you about one man (a Parole Officer) who, with his coworkers and Bounty Hunter friends regular followed us… followed us to a birthing class where we observed him covertly meet with a member of the class who tried to get friendly with us… later identified as a Naval Intelligence Officer.
I was investigating the Flight 800 shoot down at the time. I could go on like that for some time, actually, with endless tales of Men in Black, FBI, CiA, Secret Service, and even one confirmed NSA and MI-5/6 spook. Even today there is the odd event, because I often cross swords with client opponents, often some of those same players. Despite all that, I’m still not used to it.
Aurora shooting compared to clackamas shooting
About Clackamas Town Center
One of our twins currently works at Sears at one end of the Mall, as did her husband until recently. The other twin works at Penny’s, at the opposite end of the Mall. In the center of the Mall on one side we find the Century 21 theater and its adjacent food court where the shooting is said to have taken place. Opposing this, is Macey’s. Both my Wife and I used to work there… and my Sister-in-law subsequently works there, now.
The story goes this way: on Tuesday, Dec. 11, a young man whom I will not honor by naming, hurriedly left his car in the parking lot and rushed to the Macy’s exterior entrance, dropping at least one ammunition clip as he went. He was carrying an AR-15 .223 rifle almost identical to the one used by James Holmes, and wearing a ‘white mask.’ Once inside, he ran through the store attracting much attention and causing some due concern. About four seconds after running past my Sister-in-law at the Cosmetic’s Department, he opened fire. It was 3:27 PM, according to a cash register transaction at the same instant. Police say there were easily 10,000 people in the Mall at that moment. Shudder.
At 3:27 on the day before, I had been at the Mall, myself. I was in the food court where I struck up a conversation with the young woman who ran a cupcake kiosk at the edge of the food court closest to Macy’s interior entrance… where the shooter would be appearing the next day. Had I had that conversation on Tuesday instead of Monday, I would have observed first-hand the shooter as he skid to a halt and prepared his weapon, and opened fire:
He shot a woman in the chest and killed her, likely instantly. She was Cindy Yuille, a Mother of 54 years who looks very much like my Sister-in-law, and is about the same age. I shudder. He also shot in that same instant a 15 year-old teenage girl, Kristina Chevchenko, who suffered serious injury but is thankfully now recovering. She looks like a neighbor girl, and actually lives within a healthy walk’s distance from us. I shudder. He then turned the weapon on the cupcake lady, and fired but missed. As I could have been there, and had spoken to her the day before, I shudder.
Other shots fatally took down Steven Forsythe, age 45, and Father of two. He was one of those dynamic and widely admired and loved individuals who seemed to be involved in everything good, including being a high school football coach. He also lived a walk away, and was a personal friend and business colleague to one of my own friends and business colleagues. I shudder.
The shooter, it is estimated, fired some 60 rounds before fleeing and, perhaps at seeing Police were closing in, took his own life. Early in the shooting, just as in Colorado, his gun jammed. By the time he could clear it, most everyone had taken shelter, many into stores where employees were herding them into secure back rooms and locking everyone behind steel grates and heavy fire doors. Kudos, Clackamas TC!
Had their quick thinking and selflessness not been so… had the gun not jammed… had the shooter been better prepared or not been wearing a mask to partially restrict his view… had some people been confused by the echoes and run toward the shooter instead of away… I shudder.
Now, please allow me to change directions for making a couple of points. It was not that many weeks ago that one of my most popular blogs was on the Aurora shooting. I wrote it to raise 25 questions no one has asked, any one of which point to James Holmes as a patsy in a false flag terror event. I also revealed specific potential motives for outside parties to be responsible, with proofs of viability.
Aurora and Clackamas shootings compared.
Clackamas and Aurora Have Troubling Similarities
a) both alleged shooters were young troubled men with psychiatric problems (which we now hear again in the even more tragic shooting of 27 in Connecticut). This is a very tired refrain heard time and again in mass shootings, and there are reasons for concern associated with CIA’s MK Ultra and related mind control experiments;
b) both wore all black. One wore a gas mask and, sans mask, was ‘made up’ to more or less look like ‘The Joker,’ while in Clackamas, it was merely a ‘white mask.’ But there is a problem there, too: conflicting reports describe it as three distinctly different kinds of masks, and for some troubling reason, Police decline to confirm WHICH ~ a Michael Meyer’s Halloween Mask; a Jason’s style Hockey player’s mask; or a Guy Fawkes (We are Anonymous… expect us!) mask;
c) both used the same weapon, and AR-15 .223 variant. The weapon jammed and prevented more carnage;
d) both fled to no avail, which begs the question, why bother? Holmes just sat in his car and waited to be captured without resistance, while in Clackamas, the shooter took his own life. Police found him dead, sans reports of hearing or seeing him shoot himself, but why? Why wear a mask, and why run if you were going to kill yourself?
e) both incidents suffered conflicting reports as to the number of shooters seen and their whereabouts at any given point in time, implying a possible coordinated assault. In Aurora, there is considerable evidence this is so, but in Clackamas, at least thus far, we might presume it to be normal confusion causing misconception and mistaken accounts.
f) both took place in or at the virtual doorstep of a Century 21 theater. On first reports on Clackamas, I was very concerned about this particular coincidence, but am less certain it matters, now ~ because the actual shooting began in the area central to the mall at the edge of the food court, and the shooter entered from the opposite side of the complex from the theater. Had he intended to target Century 21, there was an entrance right there.
g) both enjoyed remarkably prompt Police response. In Clackamas, the shooter was not very bright. The Mall is located about one block away from the Sheriff’s Office, which also has a secondary presence right on the Mall lot with about a half dozen cars. In Aurora, the nearest facility was several miles distant and quite away from common arterials.
h) in both, Police were not terribly forthcoming with facts early on (SOP). However, mistakes made by Aurora Police in their public statements (see my post) were not present in Clackamas.
Still, with all these coincidences, I shudder. Doubly so because of the horror in Connecticut, a murderous rampage of which I cannot bring myself to write… except to say that I shudder to consider that three such shootings… four if you count the Sheik Temple shooting in Michigan… all within a window of a few weeks of the same Season… and all on the heels of a United Nations Treaty attempt to ban all firearms in civilian ownership.
Clackamas is a community of people with whom I share a happy existence in a beautiful and generally peaceful setting. Good people. So I shudder at the closeness and ‘what if’ nature of the Mall shooting as it indeed came all-too close to impacting my own family in even more personal and tragic ways. We were lucky. Others families and friends were not.
But I shudder also because all the communities where these shootings took place are like that… and in a country where government seems to be preparing itself for war with its own citizens and, in local preparation, would find any such effort a lot easier if there was some way they could ban all weapons and collect them, first. It is for my me and my family that I shudder, yes. But also, for my country and a thing called the Constitution.
Many people died when those shootings took place. But I fear the Second Ammendment may also be a casualty given the explosion of talk about gun bans as result, especially because of Connecticut… and in thinking it possible…
I do indeed shudder!
- Mind Controlled Mass Shootings Won’t Change My Mind (proparanoid.wordpress.com)
- Clackamas Town Center shooting: Cupcake kiosk employee watches shooter take aim (oregonlive.com)
- Initial tweets, reports from Clackamas Town Center shooting (oregonlive.com)
- Who Was The Oregon Mall Shooter? 4 Shot, 3 dead At Clackamas Town Center (americanlivewire.com)
Updated: Mind-Controlled Mass Shootings Don’t Change My Mind
The NWO can’t have my gun until I first get rid of the bullets
Update March 7 2013: Did the FBI undertake a covert ops to check out my gun collection (see image below, which I’ve posted both here and at my Facebook pages). Today and a few days ago, five individuals claiming to be insurance company employees entered a) my apartment; b) my daughter’s apartment; c) her husband’s father’s and brother’s apartment… claiming to do an insurance evaluation for the Landlord. They seemed to be focused on wanting to find and check out the water heater…
And so they looked in my bedroom (my office)… and then the closet… my (other) daughter’s bedroom and then the closet… the kitchen/dining area… the living room… and the master bedroom… and then the closet (where they FOUND the water heater)… and then continued looking for it in the other bathroom, the deck, and the deck closet… and then the attic storage area. It was OK, though, because they asked permission before opening any door, just like a law enforcement Officer would do when they had no warrant.
Having found the water heater behind a wall of stored items in the closet, all they could see of it was that it existed, as evidenced by about 12 square inches of tank wall and a couple of water pipes. I’m sure that was all they needed to answer their important insurance questions, because they didn’t ask anything about it, take pictures of it, or move anything to get a closer look. Yep. Insurance work is getting easier all the time thanks to the marvels of digital photography…
which, while they did not use it on the water heater, it being so important to them, and all, they did use it take pictures of other important things, mostly with deft hand-movements that concealed the camera from view. When I said something about the deck rotting after catching one of them using the camera, he even took a picture of the deck! Very important to water heater evaluations, yes?
Now would be a good time to mention that the woman looked very much like a known FBI agent from the Portland Office. Only the last time I saw her was when I was targeted by FBI for writing about Flight 800 friendly fire shoot down. I got visits from ONI, as well, and even one MI-6 chap who issued a death threat, and indeed over the next couple of months there were attempts on my life (not by him, but by local LEA, one of whom had been driving a car with license plates blocked out of Langley with DVM).
But I might be wrong. Might not be her. Kind of hard to tell because she had PUT ON SO MUCH WEIGHT! Any more and she would have a hard time passing the physical requirements. Kind of weird seeing someone who used to have a waist line now shaped more like a kite, and thinking them FBI. Kind of makes you loose confidence in government’s management capabilities, does it not?
Now is also a good time to mention that one of the men was seen wearing an old T-shirt from a known local CIA front… the one with all the technical toys hanging on his tool belt, and a clipboard. Anyone with the old T-shirt (the new ones are different) is usually an EX employee turned private contractor for hire. That front’s specialty is covert surveillance and eavesdropping. So if they left anything here, they had better real quick find a way to come and collect it before I can find it (I CAN VERY LIKELY find it), and end up filing a law suit, or at the very least go public with documentation of it.
The kicker? The image is NOT even mine, though I wish it was. It is a random image pulled from the Web for whom no original owner is evident (probably their wish). But FBI would rather do the knee-jerk, fear-based, jump-to-conclusion elaborate covert ops thing than bother to do a little research. Obama does not have enough money to pay for (anything we citizens need) but can spend $20,000 to convince the Landlord to go along with a phony insurance inspection ploy instead of $2 for a Google search? LMAO.
End of update – though I’d like you to know there are a series of companion posts which happen to also be my most popular posts (use My Posts menu item and select Top Ten).
Is FBI targeting people who have gun collections?
by H. Michael Sweeney
I may not speak for all gun owners, but i’m betting my sentiments are not at all isolated nor inconsequential. Look up the word consequence, to fully understand my meaning.
I hope the bluntness and inflammatory nature of my remarks are not lost on anyone. I deeply regret any need to write this, and in such tone, in the face of the unimaginable grief and wounds to the heart and soul of those who lost loved ones in Aurora. And though I’m sure they will not appreciate my remarks in the least, I cannot remain silent: I am incensed by the tragedy, doubly so because I see the darkness which surely drove it, and thrice so because it just happened to be within minutes of what is believed by many to be the intended new Capitol of the NewStates of America, also of that same darkness.
The shock value is for the Sheeple who need to listen up for a change and actually notice what’s happening around them outside of the sound bites they are fed daily. The NWO cares not for 71, 7,100, or 71,000,000 of us, if our loss will further their cause. We are but mere pawns who are allowed to pay for our own victimization that they may remain the 1% in power.
It’s also a warning to the governments of the World, including the United Nations and United States, that gun owners are the last people who give a damn about false flag terrorism as impacting our decisions on gun ownership. So if you want our guns, get yours, and come and try to get ours, if you can. A piece of paper, no matter whos’ signature is on it, or what flowery, tear jerking, politically correct words appear above it, will be of zero meaning to most of us, because we know why you want the guns, which brings us to the last reason for my blunt words.
Because it’s also battle cry for the rest of us, because we are so fed up with the BS that you spew forth so endlessly as if yours was the only side of the coin. We suffer from what I call too many Fascists Syndrome. You folks in power can have your Police State, but a piece of paper won’t get our guns, FIRST. You will have to take your chances after the fact, and we will see what happens when you try to go for it. You will have to get the answer to the age old question you’ve been afraid to openly ask, the hard way. And that question is…
Will we resist you, or won’t we?
You have feared the answer for decades, ever since the military Coupe your elders failed to make good on in 1933. The fear of what the answer might be to that question is all that has slowed you down, isn’t it? YOU, by the way, define the answer to that question, yourself. You define it by your actions. You would have no fear and not even need ask the question in that ‘kinder and gentler government’ you promised a few years ago, but woe unto you for the kind of government you are intent upon building, today. You risk much with every step closer to goal you take.
The Camel has a weight limit, and even we know not the final straw
What do I know that I should dare confront you so firmly? Because for decades I have researched you, and have written seven books about you. In particular, I’ve studied your preoccupation with Political Control Technology, that evil originally called mind control. There is one aspect of that, the Manchurian Candidate being a suitable (though technically incorrect) descriptor; a programmable killer, or agent, one capable of executing any foul instruction and being unable to later recall the deed, much less the instructions. MPD/DID through RSA torture is the proper term, along with hypnosis and chemical catalysts. Psychological magic mixed with Satanic methods of ancient times.
Words that should scare even you: Aritchoke, MK-Ultra, Often, Chikwit, NAOMI, and on and on. Patsies and real killers created by assembly line, rendered sleepers into society for activation on need, and often targeted with other forms of PCT to make them seem conveniently crazy should you need to call them into play. Am I crazy to say these things, or too close to the truth for you to dare even acknowledge I said them?
That is modus operandi, is it not? Ignore accusations as it tends to make people think there is nothing to them, and make the accuser go away once they get tired? Sorry, it’s been twenty years and I’m still talking, still accusing, and I am in no way alone. As result of our persistence, more and more Sheeple wake up each day, especially among the programmed sleepers. Fear us, for we are Legion! And guess what? We don’t even fear you enough to be anonymous about it.
Down to cases: to be specific, I accuse…
…that virtually every mass shooting incident has been a programmed shooter since the Texas Tower sniper felled 48 people, killing 16, in over an hour and a half of terror in 1966. And, as if some CIA operation gone wrong, media just magically stopped talking about it and kind of swept it under the carpet. Examine as many of this kind of incident as you wish, and please, by all means, lets include assassination attempts.
It is almost impossible to find an exception where the shooter was not under psychiatric care, commonly involving hypnosis and or drugs associated with CIA mind control research. At times, actual ties to CIA MC scientists or similar clues are found. Can you say, ‘Catcher in the Rye?’ How about Dr. William J. Bryan. Ring a bell? Manchurian, indeed!
It is almost impossible to find such an event where, if the shooter was captured alive, they were able to recall the incident. Why? Because of complete dissociation and honest lack of memory of the event, a known CIA methodology associated with mind control of the type in question.
It is ludicrous to the point of absurdity that any Sheeple remain unaware of the consistent ‘coincidence’ that Congress always seems to have legislation in hand ready to vote upon which ‘protects us’ from just such events as quickly as they happen, and quickly ‘strengthening gun laws.’ Gee, I have not noticed much improvement.
It was by this means that you have gotten us to register our weapons, which is something we should never have done, because now you know who and where we are, for that day when you come to collect our bullets. And you know, things still have not improved much with that law, have they?
It was by this means that you banned whole categories of weapons which would make any such effort more difficult for you, because you might end up collecting the bullets too quickly for your taste. And still no improvement in sight. Imagine that.
It was by this means that you made the good name of the NRA, of which I am not a member, and do not represent or speak for, but whom I respect, to seem to many Sheeple some dark kind of conspiracy, when in fact, it is YOU who conspire, and you who deceives. Still no improvement. Do you really think these laws through when you write them? Ever heard of logic?
And, it was by this means that you used even greater terrors to establish whole new agencies to spy upon us and to assault us with little dirty tricks in hopes of guiding us to the Sheeple category, but — SURPRISE! You instead created more of us and made us more adamant than ever. As I said, it is YOU that determines your fate, your actions which dictate the answer to your rightly asked question.
So, especially those of you in Congress, please keep that age-old question in mind when it comes time to consider outrageous gun or ammo taxes, and especially the U.N. sponsored international gun grab that gives up some more national sovereignty to the New World Order at the expense of the Constitution. Set the stage for a one World government and leader… who is that, again? The Antichrist? You really think we will allow that, do you?
Remember theses questions, and remember this: you can fool some of the people all of the time (the Sheeple), but you can’t fool the rest of us at any time, because Fascists are to us a known entity, and we do not listen to anything they say, except to hold it against them at their tribunal!
But what am I saying? I don’t even own a gun. But I assure you that I will, and millions more with me, if you force the matter to a head. Act wisely, for no one can easily stop what you might unleash through unbridled arrogance and lust for power.
What Does It Take to Start A Revolution?
What Does It Take to Start A Revolution?
(Are we in danger of having one?)
by H. Michael Sweeney
This and future blog posts on the theme of revolution (martial law, etc.) are herein intended to serve as building-block guideposts to both citizens and anyone in government who will listen to reason. Citizens so they become more aware of their rights, obligations, and options under the law as citizens. Government so that they might realize their errant ways are leading us all toward that day when the Camel’s back is broken by a straw event of their own making, and revolution breaks out as the people’s only remaining recourse. I do not believe they realize how dangerous their criminal actions have been in this respect. While I do not call for revolution, and merely warn it nears, were it to happen tomorrow I would be forced to join in it.
I fear such a day looms near, and that it may even now already be to late to prevent it. If true, it is your fault, reader, for allowing things to progress that far. Worse than revolution by the oppressed and disenfranchised, there is also the possibility that an armed revolution will be required to restore the government from a military takeover, which is addressed in part two and three of this triune post. Don’t you dare think for a moment it is not a possibility (read on).
In fact, I so fear the possibility might be true that I’m lifting the copyright on my book set Fatal RebirthSoon (stipulated limitation: purchased ebook versions may be duplicated and delivered to relatives and personal friends or coworkers, who must purchase if wishing to do the same), which contains considerable detail on these topics and specifically offers advice about what to do if it actually does come to pass. The goal is to reduce violence, save lives, and yet assure any battle for restoration of a Constitutional government is successful. Details at the end of each blog post.
This first post consists of several parts:
- The Right and Duty of Revolution;
- A Closer Look at Revolutionary Processes;
- About Redress of Grievances;
- The Start and Aftermath Revolution (a review of several actual revolutions);
The Right and Duty of Revolution
First of all, regardless of the nation-state involved, when no other recourse remains, it is one’s right and duty to self, family, and to fellow citizens and the nation to revolt against tyranny in its various forms. It is one’s right by virtue of self defense, always. But here in America, it is also our right by law, according to the Constitution. In a true working democracy, the right to armed revolution does not (should not, according to scholars) exist as such, replaced instead by the opportunity to vote in a new government, a kind of redress which is its own kind of revolution when sweeping house occurs (like that ever actually happens). However, if that democracy is thwarted by systemic manipulation such that said opportunity is wired against the people, the right and duty yet again surfaces for armed revolt.
Only so long as the democracy does not violate its charter for power (in America, the Constitution and Bill of Rights), writes just laws in accordance with the charter (laws are Constitutional), and obeys the laws itself, is it safe from armed revolt. Unfortunately, the United States has embarked on a steady course of rapid-fire issuance of unjust, oppressive, and unconstitutional laws in opposition to the charter, and has itself regularly disobeyed and abused its own laws and, and for the matter, International treaties on related matters (another discussion for another day, perhaps).
In any nation, this is rightly called tyranny, and nullifies all law in the end, though we must yet speak of redress as part of the equation. Sans such redress, the nation ceases to exist as defined by its charter, which is a legal contract between the people and the government which was hence broken by government’s wrongful acts. The just penalty is forfeiture of power, and when failing to yield and relying upon force of arms, will surely require armed rebellion to right the wrongs. It is that simple (unfortunately).
A given revolt may be of any flavor or level of intensity; civil disobedience or peaceful protest which causes the government to fail or resign, simply voting out the worst rascals and replacing them with hopefully better rascals; or when no other course works, and when matters are simply no longer tolerable, actual armed revolution. Revolution, for governments, is the bullet in the gun they continually wave about called power, the gun used in a de facto game of Russian Roulette they play every time they misuse their power. Eventually, if the game continues long enough, they shoot themselves in the head and earn their just reward. Our government has been pulling that trigger time and time again since before the September 11 attacks, and more so, since. Again, that is your fault, not theirs. You allowed it by your silence. They may be criminal, but you were negligent.
The firing of a bullet when they squeeze the trigger depends on lines in the sand drawn by those among the citizenry who are the angriest. Sometimes a citizen does not realize such a line exists (they do not premeditate it) until it is crossed, and sometimes a citizen will fear the event in advance and draw the line in bitter anticipation. When government crosses that line, whatever it may be, that citizen begins to work in earnest toward revolt. When sufficient numbers… remarkably few in count as we shall see, are so moved, a revolt can be easily triggered. Unbelievably easy, in fact. Defining appropriate lines in the sand is covered in a companion post.
Depending on what line one might choose, armed revolution in America may actually be overdue, in which case this warning is all but too late. Again understand: I do not hereby call for revolution, but shout warnings that it may soon be forced upon us by government actions and inactions. They have been playing roulette for some time, now, and many lines in the sand have already been crossed as judged by countless people I’ve talked with at public gatherings. Any day the final pull of the trigger could transpire, and yet those in government seem Hell bent to spin the chamber yet again and again, the most recent on March 1 when every Senator and Congressman except Ron Paul voted to pass the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act, which essentially ends the right to protest or freely assemble at any location near anything having to do with government, including elections, as government deems useful to retain total control; another stab through the heart of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
A Closer Look at Revolutionary Processes
Most revolutions would seem to stem from economic and social inequities brought on by an uncaring or overbearing government which favors a power elite over the needs and rights of its people. In more recent history, such practice was given a name, and that name is Fascism. Surely, even Sheeple can be made to see that paradigm is at work in the United States, today, as perhaps best made clear by the variety and nature of complaints fielded by the Occupy movement, which very nearly was the catalyst for a revolution according to some viewpoints. Certainly many wished it had sparked one or feared it might. The ‘R’ word was definitely being tossed about in commentaries far and wide.
What most people do not realize is that revolution is actually a very simple thing to engineer (though spontaneous combustion is more often the mechanism involved) — when the situation is ripe for it. When tyranny, oppression, or general grievances with government are strong enough, almost anything can spark a revolution, and it does not actually take a lot of people to get a roaring fire started. In the snapshots below, we see that an incredibly small number of people can, by the right actions and in right circumstances, sponsor, though not necessarily their intent, full-scale revolutionary responses in the general population. They need not even be carrying guns to do so, which is why the 99% were considered worthy of the ‘R’ word.
The notion of governmental suicide via Russian Roulette should be restated and underscored, for governments truly dig their own graves at their own risk. In like analogy, governments in power tend to make their own noose with respect to the outcome of a revolution, building their own platform, and then to jumping off the platform on cue to insure the success of the revolution. The platform could invariably be described as their construct of oppressive laws and abuse of power, the noose as their own unwillingness to operate within their own laws and policy, all generally to the profit of a power elite at the expense of the common citizen. They then, like a mindless Lemming, jump off the platform by coming down hard and heavy on any early revolutionary event (generally, a peaceful event where government response is violent), creating martyrs for the cause. We see this in almost every case, as the central-most thing which galvanizes support of the masses for the revolutionary cause. Spontaneous combustion results, and government’s neck gets snapped with a sudden jolt.
That is one reason the Occupy Movement failed to spark a full-scale revolution; the level of violence by government was rather minimal (say, in comparison to the kind of over-the-top response seen in the smaller-scale WTO protests such as in Seattle and in Europe). That the Federal government did not take action and no State Governor took actions involving National Guard or Martial Law were restraints which also helped keep things from boiling over.
One can also make the argument that a controlled media and other trickeries served to help keep public opinion from galvanizing sympathetic support under the unfortunate levels of violence which were present. However, their ‘polite’ and sneakier responses (including media manipulation and the FRGBI Act) was their own underhanded way of eliminating any future Occupy movement as well as WTO protests, etc., and that is why it was a bit more than just another pull of the trigger. I, for one, am hopping mad, and wondering how much the price of guns are going to go up with the increase in demand.
About Redress of Grievances
Yet another reason the Occupy movement did not ignite open revolt is that actual revolution was never its intent, though it is likely true that sub groups within the movement might have thought or hoped otherwise. Rather, the movement in general simply sought public exposure of a collective of grievances in hopes of sponsoring useful redress by government. In point of fact, redress of grievances is what activism, protest, and even revolution is all about. We should be well informed on this topic to understand what it means to be under a government, and especially so as an American, as redress is a key part of our very foundation as a democratic nation (in Republic form).
Redress of grievances, when ignored by government, is the sponsor of ALL revolutions. The United States Constitution and Bill of Rights specifically address redress as a major element of that covenant between the People and Government. Where any government fails to insure its obligations to satisfactorily resolve issues of redress remain fully functional and available to citizens, they make themselves liable to revolution as the only remaining alternative for the people. In the U.S., redress is, unfortunately, absolutely flat-out null and void; the Bill of Rights and Constitution have been all but formally discarded, and the systems in place for such redress have been neutered and rendered ineffective.
For example, the notion of challenging unconstitutional laws through the Courts is rendered impractical when it costs millions of dollars and takes toward a decade to see it through to finish… and Congress writes such laws ten times faster than they can be dealt with. Two such Bills in roughly four weeks time! That is not redress, it is premeditated manipulation of a weakness in the system. Whirr… Click! Whirrrrr,,,
When political heros are assassinated and groups of people are murdered en mass again and again by government acts and a cover up ensues, there is no redress. Whirr… Click!
When lip-service white-washing Warren Commission/9-11 Commission and bogus Congressional Investigations serve as cover up tools (e.g., sealing records, refusing/discounting testimoney/evidence, magic bullet explanations), there is no redress. Whirr… Click!
When whistleblowers are targeted instead of heeded, there is no redress. Whirr… Click!
When government rewards criminal bankers and others who rape the common man and sends the bill to the victims, and they steal more money from Social Security to help offset the sticker price, there is no redress. Whirr… Click!
When wars for oil and other profits are based on lies but no one even apologizes, there is no redress. One could go on, as nowhere do I see useful redress in evidence. All I hear is Whirr… Click! What do you hear? Certainly seems you do not hear your own voice shouting out a loud “Enough!” At least not yet. Whirrrr…
The Start and Aftermath of Revolution
So, how easy is it to spark a revolution? The answer will help measure how close we may be to having one. Lets take one good case example which is quite parallel in many ways to the situation in the United States, today, and then run some numbers for it and several other famous (major) revolutions for comparison. A revolution is actually easy to come by, if the right ducks are in a row, heaven please forbid such a need.
The French Revolution 1848…
France had a population of about 38 million at the time and was suffering a Monarchy quite uncaring of its people in favor of the wealthy. It was a kind of Fascism where nobility tended to be the most wealthy and most prominent of ‘corporate’ powers. High unemployment and underemployment rates of deep double digits forced the Middle and lower classes into poverty, in part fueled by a shift in focus by Industry to part time employment for those few able to keep their jobs. Sound familiar?
General economic crisis caused a surge in bankruptcies and small business failures at the hands of the larger corporations of the day. An unusually severe Winter brought on by a Greenlandic volcanic ash cloud which severely damaged crops that year was fueled by a shortage of coal and food brought on by the economic crisis. Almost the entire populace was in dire straights, unless wealthy or of noble birth. France wold fall almost overnight before the year’s end. Let them eat cake? What cake?
The government continued to be both unable and unwilling to address problems and instead fueled them with solutions which either failed to be useful or which were actually profit opportunities for the wealthy. The military was time and again pressed into service to police and stem protests (they jumped off their platform). Instead of quelling and calming the public, these responses fueled them and fostered a unison of anger.
In June of 1848 the French Revolution was essentially started by 577 citizens (commoners referred to as the Third Estate, which is, by the way, a designation system used by Royals: the Royals are the First Estate, whereby Barons and Lords are the Second Estate, citizens the Third Estate, and from which media has since often been called the Fourth Estate), who in outrage over being denied their legal appearance at court for redress, met in conference (known as The Tennis Court Oath) to protest. This was their 99% moment, and they agreed (577 out of 578) in an Oath which established themselves as a governmental authority (The National Assembly) seeking Constitutional reforms which eventually would lead to the drafting of the Declaration of the Rights of Man, a document quite similar in character to the Bill of Rights.
This revolutionary act (the Oath), and the to-be-expected heavy-handed response by military so useful for the purpose, indeed galvanized splintered groups into a unified resistance which quickly evolved into people taking to the streets in Paris and elsewhere, eventually to storm the Bastille and force the Crown to retire in favor of forming The French Republic. It took less than two weeks for the government to fall. It was the best of times, it was the worst of times (Dickens; A Tale of Two Cities.)
The 577 who took a stand represented a mere .000015% of the nation’s populace, or about one in 7,000 persons. But the mood of the people was sympathetic to their aims, and when government reacted in murderous opposition instead of simply ignoring them, an unstated rally call was heard and heeded by the people. In France, the civil and military powers had guns and cannons, and the people only had pitchforks, swords, rocks, and scant few firearms. But they had anger and numbers which quickly forced capitulation, though at a cost of life on both sides – about 300,000 souls, or just under 1% of the population. Not all revolutions are even that costly.
The American Revolution began with a similar meeting of just 56 Men from the 13 Colonies, the population of the Colonies at the time about 2 million. That was the 1st, and later, the 2nd Continental Congress, and we know where that led in short order. That means about .000028% or one in 3,500 persons was all it took. King George, of course, jumped off the platform big time, leading to Lexington, and the resulting loss of life for both sides combined was about 34,000, or 1.5%.
The U.S.S.R. Revolution of 1991 began with 36 delegates of the Baltic Republic of Estonia and Latvia who, along with several hundred ‘Intellectuals’ signed a demand of autonomy from the Soviet Union (that would be like a Texas and California demanding Secession from the Union). This forced the Russian Communist Party (their government) to consider their redress and to attempt a compromise to hold Russia together, as other States were also wanting to flee the Union, but in the end, it would not be — the ship was clearly sinking. The population of the U.S.S.R. at the time was about 290 million. That works out to .0000015 or about 1 in 70,000.
A lot of things happened stepwise, but the important aspect is that violence was quite mitigated because government did not exactly jump off the platform. Instead, the military almost immediately sided with the revolutionaries, and such violence was not needed as a catalyst because the grievances were many and hatred of the System already abounded universally, even among the military, which at best, had split loyalties. Deaths were virtually unreported they were so few, though civil unrest in power struggles within, between, or with the various Soviet States which elected autonomy in the years following would result in significant loss of life at levels on par with other revolutions. Yet these deaths were not truly the price of freedom for Russia herself. Thus one of the greatest tyrannical governments of all time, a government itself established by a bloody revolution not 100 years earlier, was deposed with hardly a shot fired. Bravo!
The Indian Revolution for freedom from British Rule led by Ghandi in 1919 could arguably be described as a revolution fostered by one man from a population of about 250 million, though in his triumphant ‘March to the Sea to make salt, an illegal act by British decree in attempt to force Indians to pay a salt tax, he set out with 78 followers. By the time he reached the Sea, there were untold thousands. Even so, that defiance was the start of the revolution in real terms, involving only one in about 316,000 persons. The loss of life in the shooting part, which was one-sided as the entire revolution was one of non-violent protest, was about 1,000. These were from British atrocities such as British troops trapping 10,000 unarmed men, women, and children in a public courtyard in Amritsar and opening fire (scene from movie, Ghandi) without warning, expending 1,650 rounds of rifle fire before withdrawing without providing medical aid.
Ironically, the commanding Officer in that event did more to set India free than perhaps Ghandi with respect to World opinion and political fallout. That is the power and importance of government’s role in their own revolutionary downfall.
Inversely, however, it is no guarantee of success to be sure. Revolutions are a dicey thing.
By example, Red China did not fall as a result of the Tiananmen Square revolution in 1989, in part, because the Red Chinese attempted a total media blackout while they killed 7,000 unarmed students gathered in peaceful protest. With a population of 1.1 billion, that is still only .000006%.
But here is the important part, a singular event which took place after the carnage. One man defied the full might of the Army in an unimaginable act of defiant bravery, and got away with it, If, on the other hand, they had rolled their tank column over the lone civilian deliberately blocking their path… which had been managed to be captured by media… I suspect China would now be a true Republic free of Communist rule. If so, one man would have taken the credit in my book. This showed the World the power of the individual voice. That, my friend, would be your voice… SHOULD be YOUR VOICE… with as much of his demonstrated power as you care to assume in using it.
Thus we see that most revolutions require relatively little bloodshed, typically less than 1-2% in population loss, and relatively little original effort by a mere handful of citizens… provided the government truly lives up to tyrannical expectations and resists with all the forces at its disposal. As you continue (please) on to read the other posts associated with this post, keep this in mind, and judge for yourself how close to revolution we may or may not be. Decide which side you would choose to support if shooting does start, and make plans for your family’s safely transitioning through any such upheaval. I can only provide a warning and advice on what to consider and what to do… but only you can make the critical decisions that matter.
And they do matter… to you and your family… and to the nation in which you must seek to pursue happiness and whatever destiny awaits us all, every one.
- On the Impossibility of Limited Government and the Prospects for a Second American Revolution – Hans-Hermann Hoppe – Mises Daily (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- ‘Europe on the brink of armed-revolution’ (rt.com)
- 13 Reasons Why The Revolution Might Start with Obamacare (blacklistednews.com)
- Why the Occupy Movement Frightens the Corporate Elite (truth-out.org)
- GOP Newsletter Calls for Armed Revolution if Obama Re-Elected (alan.com)
- A Stealth Coup d’État in the United States (english.pravda.ru)
REVOLUTION 2.0: Would Military back Constitutionalists or Socialist/Communist?
Posted by Author H. Michael Sweeney
Progressive leftist/fascists seem to be pressing for armed-conflict by trashing the 2nd Amendment (and other atrocities), confident they own the military’s loyalty. They don’t, but that simple answer is worthless, and for a long list of scary reasons.
by H. Michael Sweeney proparanoid.wordpress.com Facebook proparanoid.net
Dateline, March, 16, 2019, from the Olympic Peninsula, in the shadow of Califoregoshingtoncopyright © 2019, all rights reserved. Permission to repost hereby granted provided entire post with all links in tact, including this notice and byline, are included. Quote freely, links requested. Please comment any such repost or quote link to original posting.
Reading, you will learn:
An important question
The question I have posed in my books since before the turn of the Century was this: what would happen if there is an attempt to take over the government by some form of coup, or to subvert/destroy the Constitution, such as seizure of guns from citizens or abandoning of National Sovereignty to the North American Union and the New World Order? The simple answer is a civil war, or what I term Revolution 2.0. There is both a right and duty of revolution, which reveals this truth: when a Country makes laws which fly in the face of logic, natural law, Constitutional law, and the laws of your lawfully chosen faith… and endanger the nation’s future and safety, it’s time to overthrow that government. That answer itself leads to many more questions, such as, what does it take to start a revolution, and how close are we to having one? But the most important one to participants in any such civil unrest, and which this post attempts to answer, is this:
which side will the military back in such a revolution, and how real is the possibility that the military might choose wrongly?
This post is an in-depth analysis, and as result, is about a 30 minute read with some important, unexpected, and revealing content… surprising even me, in fact… and I’ve been writing (in warning) on this topic for nearly two decades. If you are the sort who prefers sound bite news, just skip to the last section (In Summary), so you can simply confirm your belief bias without gaining any actual knowledge, be it agreeing with me, or discounting my findings in your ignorance of the facts which lead to that conclusion. That is your choice, to make, and your responsibility to choose. The same will be true of Revolution 2.0, where wrong choice based on ignorance could have serious consequences for you, your family, your country, and the World.
In seeking an answer, it should be noted that fascist-minded megalomaniacs have existed within all Militaries since the dawn of the institution; such personalities are naturally drawn to military and Police, and tend to rise in the ranks to positions of command. Regardless of any outer political views they wear on their sleeves, they tend to be fascist/police-statists in their thinking. More so, in America, perhaps, since 1947, when the DOD and CIA were founded, and the Military Industrial (and Intelligence) Complex was ‘invented.’ I have since added the liberal media cabal to the complex, resulting in the nick-name, MIIM. Every generation has them; people who find fascism more useful to their rise to power than they see in guarding your freedom and rights. There are several important illustrations of this in our history, and they reveal that some among US military leadership are well capable of siding with the wrong side… perhaps even engineering a reason for a conflict which might enable or excuse a coup.
Some call it a ‘Deep State mentality.’ I call it New World Order thinking.
Note: while this post is made in an America where, at the moment, the greatest threat capable of forcing civil conflict comes from progressive leftists… and while that group embodies and employs elements of the Deep State, Fascism, and globalist New World Order agenda… the Deep State, Fascism, and the New World Order has allies on both the left and right, almost always in the extremest versions, thereof — in almost EVERY country on the planet. You can’t tell your players without a program, and while some players stick out visibly on both sides, no one is publishing a program. Trust no establishment politician, international corporation, or anyone promoting extreme liberalism, socialism, communism, or extreme conservativism or nationalism. Ferris Bueller was right: “A person shouldn’t believe in isms. They should believe in themselves.”
We know, for instance, that the Military has worried about a possible not-so ‘civil war’ between the branches, between units within a branch, or individual soldiers within a unit, for some time. The rank and file of the military is by and large duly patriotic, mindful that they are not to obey unlawful orders, and understand and honors their Oaths to uphold and protect the Constitution. Yet they are also trained to obey without question. No military in the World can do both well, simultaneously, in times of conflict. Unlawful orders transpire, and are obeyed by most, and to disobey can be seriously punished, with any such incidents typically swept under the carpet. No one wants to be a vanquished martyr for a silenced and unheard cause.
The proof of military’s concern over this paradoxical is in the form of a questionnaire since referred to as the ’Shoot Americans Questionnaire,’ which has been given to various sampled units in various branches over the years. The good news is, not too many soldiers indicated they would obey orders to fire on Americans who, for instance in just one of several scenario questions, “refused to turn in their guns.” Other questions about use of deadly force related to other causes or issues of some concern, here, such as if the soldier would be willing to swear allegiance to United Nations Commanders, in deference to US law (it did not mention US law).
That questionnaire arose out of our second evidence, the Revolution in Military Affairs. RMA is the notion that as modern technology and political realities evolve, the military needs to adapt its war fighting policies, tactics, and capabilities to maximize efficiency and reduce chances of failures. Nothing wrong with that; all militaries do it. However, in the 70s and 80s, it literally became a field of think-tank study within the military, and frequently a common topic of discussion the the U.S. Army’s War College publication, Parameters. Within its pages, according to an article which appeared in the now defunct Washington D.C. Newspaper, The Spotlight, was an RMA based article which defined the ‘new face’ of America’s next new war. In fact, as I recall, the piece was titled ‘America’s New War,’ which was, ironically, exactly the propagandist terms media used to describe the war to liberate Kuwait.
In the quotes from the Parameters pages, the next new kind of warfare which needed to be planned for would be with “former military, militia, patriots, constitutionalists, and the poor and disenfranchised.” Excuse me? Since when are such the enemy of the State? When did the military start thinking the government is so far afield from righteousness that the military must plan for waring with upset citizens? Why should any who so think be allowed the command of force of arms? But that is not all. RMA also established something called the “21st Century Politico-Military Force Matrix,” which is largely the marriage of local law enforcement and military actions in a matrix of options for dealing with unruly civilian populations. Then there is MOOTW, “Miltary Operations Other Than War,” which provides clear operating strategies for interactions with citizens as potential combatants, including use of force of arms. It has also been called “The People’s War” by the military… for dealing with a civilian uprising.
Finally, there is the dramatic increase in development of psychological warfare technologies (mind control) and non-lethal weaponry… for military application against civilian populations. This is sometimes referred to as the Forth Epoch War, and I’ve written whole books on that, and one of them, The Professional Paranoid Defensive Field Guide, lists nearly 500 technical terms which represent the sum total of such weaponry, methodologies, and strategies. Among them are terms representing the construction and use of whole fake communities which can in no way be taken for anything but American towns, where training exercises regularly take place in door-to-door searches, traffic blockade/check point vehicle searches, and storming of buildings in SWAT-like operations.
If that were not enough, there have been actual training exercises in a long list of major and lesser American cities (i.e., LA, Houston, Chicago, etc.), much to the alarm of citizens who were NOT informed of the operations until AFTER they are completed… event though in some cases direct citizen confrontation, detainment, and questioning had been involved… often by Psychological Warfare units. At times, civil rights had been violated or citizen’s safety put at risk. This has been going on for more than four decades, and it has been getting more blatant and frequent every four years or so (an interesting characteristic, given election cycles).
Finding clues within previous coup attempts
The answer as to which side the military would take in such a scenario, is the same as would seem to worry the Pentagon, based on the questionnaire and their significant focus on civilian confrontation in RMA. I have always believed, that the inescapable answer is BOTH — resulting in rebellions amid the military, itself, both within and between branches, and within units. There have been two well-played-out but failed attempts at a military coup in America which serve as models of any such scenario, and these deserve some scrutiny. The first one was real (the 1933/34 Business Plot to depose President Roosevelt and establish a Fascist government), and served as a model for the second, which is where we will start for reasons beneficial to context of any Revolution 2.0. The most recent was a fictional depiction written by Political writer/researcher (Fletcher Knebel) and a former Editor of a major newspaper (Charles W. Bailey II). I’ll start there.
Though their book, Seven Days in May, was indeed fiction, it was extremely well researched and quite factual in its underpinnings, and enjoys the modern context of the Department of Defense and Joint Chiefs of Staff, which did not exist in 1933. The book was a best seller and makes excellent reading, but it was also made into a box office hit you can watch online, starting Kirk Douglas and Burt Lancaster. There are several reasons it makes a good model, despite its fictional nature; it was based on factual basis relevant to our time, then, and now.
The movie was produced in the shadow and conspiratorial clouds leading to the assassination of John Kennedy, of which many people wondered if that ugly scar in America’s history was a plot involving some sort of political coup. Indeed, many clues uncovered over time pointed to military involvement. One was that the usual way the local National Guard military participation in Presidential visits was ordered to stand down, not unlike what happened in the Clinton/Obama Benghazi debacle resulting in the deaths of Marines and Embassy Officials, there. Another was the intrigue and conflict between Kennedy and the Joint Chiefs over the war in Vietnam, the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Bay of Pigs Invasion; the war hawks thought him soft on Communism.
Moreover, Kennedy had turned down the Joint Chiefs plan to fake a series of false-flag ‘Cuban terrorism’ events to justify an full out invasion and ousting of Castro, called Operation Northwoods… which also happens to be the blueprint visibly in play in the terror events leading to 9-11 attacks and the series of Middle East oil wars predicted in my book set, Fatal Rebirth — which predicted both the WTC downing by false-flag jetliner terrorism and the resulting oil wars in 1999, nearly two years before the attack. The Knebel/Bailey book itself was also written as a kind of harbinger of possible things to come based on many of the above difficulties between Kennedy and the Chiefs, and, ironically, Kennedy himself was quite fond of the book, likely recognizing aspects of the plot line to his own mirrored reality.
Sadly, he did not give it enough due, or he might have been able to foresee the deadly future which lay ahead for him… and perhaps, even forestall the use of Northwoods in our more recent history. The name Northwoods itself, by the way, was based on WWII Nazi operations of like false-flag nature… and the name Northwoods references Germanic translation, ‘Wald Im Norden’ (woods in/of the north) which also describes the invasion of Poland, which began WWII… the German Army swarmed into Poland from the forests to it’s North as did the air Blitzkrieg which overflew it. The fascists would, thereby, engulf the World in flame for a second time.
Note: Should the reader doubt any prime point within this post, they should hold final opinion until watching Seven Days in May. It will be well worth your time on an entertainment basis, alone. It is absolutely critical to understand the relationship of the various branches of service, how troop movement, material (weapons, munitions, supplies) and funding are manipulated within the context of the Department of Defense, and Presidential/Congressional oversight. The education, alone, is also motivation enough to watch the movie… as is the fact that much of the dialog is quite unhappily the same you are hearing on TV from commentators and politicians today; treason is afoot, for real, and as in the film as well as in 1933. But the key point in common with both the film/book and partially true in the Business Plot (there was no Air Force in ’33), was the absolute need to include the Marines and Air Force in key roles on one side or the other… and a means to ‘exclude’ non participants in the plot from interference as the coup unfolded.
Fascism brings us back to the Business Plot, which was undertaken by fascist business leaders of the most famous kind, including Bush, Harriman, Singer, DuPont, Hearst, Heinz, Mellon, Morgan, and others. But it was deemed that the plot could not succeed without a (then retired) Marine, one General Smedley Butler, who was the most popular military figure in the country, at the time. Butler was approached and ‘recruited’ to lead an uprising of unhappy Veterans who were owed money by the Government and unable to collect because of the Great Depression, which was also the source of unhappy ire of the businessmen. Butler’s role, if undertaken as intended, was to lead some 500,000 Veterans in ‘revolt,’ to seize the Capitol and depose or destroy the President, and hold Congress hostage, pending satisfactory reformation of a new government model.
Such a plot could not dare being risked unless assured that the military would both be unable to respond quickly enough to prevent the coup, and once in place, would not dare confront Butler and his civilian army (called the Bonus Army), or their fascist backers. Clearly, the backers of the plot must have had some private assurances from at least the Army, if not the Navy, that there would be no objection. The Chief of Staff (highest ranking General in command of the Army) in 1933 was Douglas MacArthur, who clearly did not get along well with Roosevelt, and was thought to be a fascist at heart. His counterpart in the Navy, Chief of Naval Operations, was Admiral William V. Pratt, who was very unhappy with the depression, as it had forced severe reduction of Naval forces, and threatened to merge the Coast Guard and the Navy, an idea which he opposed vehemently. The Commandant of the Marine Corps, Ben Herbard Fuller, also a JCS equivalent, was similarly suffering retrenchment because of the depression, and deeply respected Butler and MacArthur. To be clear, neither Fuller or Pratt have ever been accused of fascist leanings, as had been MacArthur, but a change in power favoring the military would not have hurt their wishes for a stronger military to command.
Thankfully, Smedley was a patriot who refuse the recruitment, and he instead exposed and thwarted the plot before it could get off the ground… though there was also a failed assassination attempt involving an Italian immigrant of fascist viewpoints in 1933. And, in the TV series, City of Angels (a TV spin-off of the Movie Chinatown, staring Wayne Rogers), the greater plot line in a three-part season opener (The November Plan) featured a foiled attempt to assassinate Roosevelt in a trip to California. That ‘fictional’ plot line was based in factual realities (subject to Hollywood license, of course), and did involve Smedley Butler as well as soldiers in uniform intent on betraying Roosevelt. The screenplay was by well respected researcher and writer of crime/detective drama, Stephen J. Cannell.
Now let us similarly disect the 1963 example…
The other key player in Seven Days of May was an Air Force General. Modern troop and material movement requires the coordinated support of the US Air Force. It was, in fact, this critical role which was the underlying plot mechanism of Seven Days in May, and quite critical to our understanding of what it would take for a modern coup to succeed. Therefore, with respect to Revolution 2.0, and Deep State influence over possible military opposition against Constitutionalists, those seeking to destroy the Constitution will need to include support of the Air Force, as well. The Army is less a concern, because the bulk of the standing Army is in deployment, and because each State’s National Guard is available to the Governors of each State in case of ‘civil unrest,’ which is what they would call the matter, seeking to hide the truth from the public: that any revolution was to save and restore Constitutional law against traitors.
If the State was run by liberals, the National Guards could be activated by the Governor against the ‘rebels,’ as they might also be termed for political propaganda expediency. If the State was conservative, the DOD could order the Guard to stand down (so as not to aid the ‘rebels’) or be activated at the Federal level to oppose the patriots. That could be true only if the majority of Joint Chiefs were on board with the unconstitutional effort underway. Stateside regular Army could potentially be directed to fill in where National Guard units or their Governor refused to stand down or comply with Federal activation. That would be an example of ‘civil war’ between elements within a given branch of the Military, and it is expected that any such use of troops, regardless if acting on Federal or gubernatorial orders, would experience conflict within their ranks, seriously inhibiting their efficiency.
In like manner, the Navy is largely out of the picture; the bulk of it is also on station around the World, and it is not well poised to impact ground actions within the borders of the US, short of coastal regions. In Seven Days of May, the Navy simply stood down. The same should be true of the Coast Guard, perhaps more so. Amid all of this, there is an added problem which provides a logical reason to stand down. Specifically, in such a coup, the military still needs to insure unfriendly actors such as China, N. Korea, Iran, or even Russia… did not take advantage of an America engaged in civil war. They might, for instance, choose to wax adventurous against allies, or even against US forces. Ergo, the Navy and much of the strategic Air Force would need to devote their attention to World affairs; standing down from any major role in the revolution would be tactically wise. And, in the next section, we will see ample reason for concern over their ability handle two conflicts simultaneously, both at home and abroad.
Perhaps we ought take a close look at Obama’s JCS, still now in place, and see what’s going on with them, in like-comparison.
What about today’s Joint Chiefs?
We must compare the two historical examples against today’s potential for replay. Looking back to 1933 and 1963, what about 2023, or some other current time frame? How does today’s situation compare, to then? Politically, there were fascist undercurrents mainly in the business community in 1933, where in 1963, the fascists were additionally present in the military industrial (and intelligence community) complex. They still exist to some degree in both sectors, today… but there is more afoot. Today, we see socialist/communist/anarchists and progressives on the Left using fascist tactics, including members of Congress. They are pitching socialism, but acting like fascists.
Today’s environment, then, is not so different from the past, and is perhaps worse, in final analysis… so what about the key military players at the Pentagon? How do they, and their resources, compare to the 1933 and 1963 scenarios?
In 1933, there was no Air Force, but there was a retired Marine at least thought able to raise a civilian ‘Bonus Army’ army of veterans, and a presumed friendly Army Chief of Staff. Butler was a key military resource. In 1963, it was once more a Marine in the book/screen play (Kirk Douglas) who busted a coup attempt… a plot orchestrated by an Air Force General who was the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and three JCS (Army, Air Force, Marines — Coast Guard did not have representation in 1964), while the Navy Joint Chief who was aware, wanted no part of it, but yet remained silent of it.
In 1933, Butler was retired, the most likely candidate to orchestrate such a coup. Today, the pro liberal/progressive/fascist forces would likely be stirred to replay 1933 with the likes of Retired Army General Tommy Franks, who was Clinton’s right-hand military man… the man who ordered the flame throwing tank and commanded at Waco. As such, he enjoys free access to anyone in the Pentagon on at least an informal basis, and still holds a security clearance. As a Deep State operative, he could become the organizing and communications agent in any such modern-day plot. He also has many friends and contacts within the military industrial (MIIM) complex. He meets the 1933 model, as a recruitment target/tool — one I feel unlikely to adopt Butler’s patriotic response.
And the plot in 1963 required at least the bulk of the Joint Chiefs to participate, or be cowered into silence. The Joint Chiefs today consist of one four-star General to represent each branch of service, including someone to represent the Coast Guard and the National Guard, plus a Chairman and vice Chairman, for a total of seven top-echelon decision makers. Today, thanks to Obama, the JCS consists of two Marines and three US Air Force Generals to form a ‘heavy weighting’ of representation to the same two branches deemed important in 1963. I say thanks to Obama, because he conducted a purge of some 266 top-ranking military officers, and oversaw a rapid series of promotions necessary to put his personally approved people into the JCS chairs.
One Marine, General Joseph Dunford, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, owes his position to that purge with a series of four rapid-paced promotions and appointment to the post by Obama. He is the most powerful man in the military, the counterpart to the 1963 role played by Burt Lancaster in film, though a Marine, instead of Air Force. The Vice Chairman, however, is Air Force (Paul J. Selva), also appointed by Obama with six rapid promotions. The Joint Chief of the Marines, General Robert Neller, had three promotions under Obama to his post, making two Marines in total.
The Joint Chief of the Air Force, General David L. Goldfein, enjoyed five promotions under Obama, and Air Force General Joseph L. Lengyel (making the third Air Force General) is JCS representing the National Guard. He had five promotions under Obama, while Admiral John M Richardson, Navy’s JCS, had only one promotion under Obama… it perhaps being understood in the 1963 model that the Navy is a non-critical player in a coup. In like relationship, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, Admiral Karl L Schultz, a de facto 8th JCS… appointed by President Trump, as was General Mark A Milley, the Army’s Joint Chief. Again, the Army is a conflicted player, both by virtue of deployments and National Guard complications, the one branch of the services most likely to be at war with itself in a coup-like or Revolution 2.0 scenario.
And, it would appear that Obama’s bevy of purge-replacement military officers have been quietly sabotaging the military in ways which make national defense abroad that much harder, perhaps shifting capabilities to a homeland conflict (I hate using that fascist term, ‘homeland’). In fact, difficult enough that the Air Force, by way of example, might not be able to provide any aid to patriots, or be a factor against them, at all, outside of material and troop transport. If today’s Air Force capabilities analysis is any clue, President Trump no longer has a full deck of military cards to play. A conflict at home and abroad would tax any Trump effort to support Constitutionalists, even were the DOD not under the control of Deep State plants.
Monkey wrench conspiracy theories
One tool the Air Force has which could prove extremely troublesome if aligned with treason, is Command Solo. There are 21 Command Solo aircraft, all based at Pennsylvania’s National Guard; specially modified C-130s capable of significant mind control capabilities via Political Control Technology (PCT). I find it troubling that such capabilities are National Guard, rather than Regular Army or Air Force, making it all that much easier to use against citizens. A single plane can impact a two-five State region, depending on State sizes. All of them fly regular training flights, unless in use overseas in a combat theater.
Impact? The Air Force has admitted that they were used in Bosnia to sway elections, and in Iraq to convince thousands of Iraqi crack troops to surrender to small drones which were essentially RC model airplanes with cameras. The chief weapon the plane has is the interception of local radio and television broadcasts, which it then embeds with hidden inaudible subliminal messages which the subconscious mind does absorb. Such messages can be of any desired simple but endlessly repeated phrases or key words (such as ‘surrender, turn in your guns, vote Democrat’) for rebroadcast at a stronger signal strength than the original. The secondary weapon is more insidious; EEG entrainment.
Human brainwaves for emotions operate at ultra low frequencies, and are roughly the same across population samples. If the desired emotional state of being is broadcast at signal strengths greater than that of the brain, the brain adopts them as its own (is entrained). By combining subliminals with emotional state manipulation, such as an abiding and overwhelming fear, Command Solo can impact tens or hundreds of thousands of people while in the air. In such use, it can fly 24/7 with required stops for refueling and crew changes, or in rotation with another Command Solo aircraft.
The training flights they fly involve preprogrammed mission tapes representing ‘harmless’ subliminals and EEG patterns to be used, but not even the operators on board, or their commanders, have any way of knowing what the content actually is (presumed to be ’empty’ of content.) So when they fly training missions, they could very well be telling Democrats to be outraged about everything, violent, etc., and no one would be the wiser, except the person who ordered the tapes to be made, and used, and the computer operator who created the tapes.
Watching your emotions and being alert for changes in that and any unexpected thought patterns which represent something contrary to your original belief structures, is your only clue the plane is being used. The average person won’t question. The strong-willed and alert, can detect, and can resist, if strong minded and inwardly alert. The other clue is seeing the aircraft in the air. A good spotting scope, rifle scope, or telephoto lens can easily recognize if a suspected plane is a C-130 with the Command Solo configuration. Command Solo, and other PCT are well covered in terms of detection and defense in my book, MC Realities.
Another wildcard conspiracy theory is “UN Intervention,” and I here draw upon the ten years of research documented in my book set, Fatal Rebirth. There have largely been two waves or versions of this theory, and both are based in demonstrable facts nonetheless consistently denied by both US military and the UN, itself. The first took hold back the 1990’s and a bit before, with origins earlier than that, tied to far-right thinkers and political forces, such as retired General and US Senator, Barry Goldwater, who foresaw the New World Order’s rise through the U.N. In the 90’s, large numbers of people were seeing and reporting long trainloads of flatbed cars loaded with white U.N. military vehicles, as well as similar on river barges and tractor-trailer units, sometimes in convoys on American highways. Other reports talked of holding areas with hundreds of units parked in neat rows, typically surrounded by military quality fencing and guard stations manned by ‘Men in unmarked black uniforms.’
Most of the 43 United Nations ‘Biospheres’ in some cases rendered off-limits to citizens and subject to UN control as part of Agenda 21.
This was also the same time frame when people hiking in select wilderness areas were encountering armed soldiers, also in unmarked black uniforms who were apparently conducting some kind of drill or operation. Invariably, they were said to have been speaking both English and a foreign language of some sort, and ordering civilians away at gunpoint, advising they had entered a military compound. Many of these reports of vehicles and soldiers made the newspapers in one form or another, sometimes with pictures, but the military and the UN denied any validity. Some of these events and UN vehicle stockpiles were indeed in ‘wilderness’ areas tied to the 43 United Nations Biospheres regions, which is its own Agenda 21 conspiracy topic.
The U.N., for instance, has officially insisted it has no men or vehicles in North America, and does not use the types of vehicles being spotted. Most were identifiable as American WWII era, or more modern US Army vehicles, and many more were of Soviet manufacture. And, at the time, large numbers of Soviet military equipment, including helicopters, trucks, tanks, rocket batteries, and even specialized units such as CBRN (Chemical Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear) decontamination trucks were being brought into the country by someone, sighted variously in transit or storage in either original Soviet or UN colors… no unit or national markings lest it simply be ‘UN.’
Let’s take just one very interesting and well documented case (my 1990 research, plus the Spotlight in the same timeframe), to drive the point home. It involves Soviet ARS-14 biological/chemical warfare trucks shipped from West Germany through the firm Beesh Merkator to Gulfport, MS, then by barge to Scranton, Iowa to a company, Airmar Resources, Corp, operated by Lt. Col. A. R. Koval Sr., USAF, retired. Koval told the Spotlight that the units were purchased for Germany and destined for UN forces in Europe after refurbishing, contrary to UN statements it does not, by policy, use Soviet equipment of any kind.
These units have been in the U.S. for nearly a decade. US made, mfg says they are for use overseas, but UN denies using US vehicles or having inventory in America.
The investigation continued, revealing that from Scranton, they were transited to various destinations in America through firms named Newway and Scranton Manufacturing. The later firm, contrary to Airmar Resources claims, said the trucks were being converted to ‘garbage trucks,’ but the EPA said it would be impossible for those vehicles to be made to meet vehicle standards. Scranton responded that they were destined for European markets, but one has to ask about the cost effectiveness of buying and shipping trucks from Europe to America for modifications, and then shipping them back to Europe. Scranton at the time indeed offered a line of new garbage trucks, but none were of Soviet origin. All were, like the Soviet units, painted white, of course. A nifty cover story that almost works, if you don’t look too closely.
And, as stated, the modified trucks were tracked to US destinations, not Europe. One, in fact, spotted in California on a flatbed truck, was leaking noxious smelling liquids which made the witness sweat profusely and ill to his stomach. Marked with a sign “Quarantined by US Department of Agriculture,” the fluid was being drained into a trench by men in protective clothing. Both Newway and Scranton Manufacturing are alternate names for a small but troubled firm associated with Bede Jet Corp, the maker of small fiberglass civilian jets (build-it-yourself kits) like the one James Bond (Roger Moore) used to attack Castro’s air base in the opening sequence of Octopussy. Newway, in fact, also made Bede-designed, Honda-powered, fully enclosed two-seat motorcycle-car kits, also of fiberglass.
The more recent wave of UN concerns is fare easier to demonstrate (the images above, for instance), and involves UN intervention officially in place. It comes from the Obama Administration’s invitation for the UN sponsored program referenced as the Strong Cities Network. Based on selling fear of terrorism, in particular, ‘home-grown extremists,’ the program calls for United Nations help to member Cities in the Network. The help goes directly to and influences the Police Departments within the network, as well as city management. On the surface, as sold to citizens in the fear mongering, it sounds like a way to gain some expertise in combating terrorism. But that is a deliberately false narrative.
Interesting: Obama is said to be slated to be next Secretary General of the UN…
Conspiracy theorists early-on tried to warn people it was a dreadful mistake and a trap. Now, even non theorists are proving the conspiracy is no theory, and far more serious than even early theorists, had thought. It turns out that the Strong City Network acts as its own Law Enforcement Agency, and is empowered to actually govern member cities. Cities which join the network essentially are subject to UN Rule of law, rather than the US Constitution. Currently, New York, Atlanta, Denver, and Minneapolis are members, and a push is underway for Boston, west-coast cities, and elsewhere, to follow suit. In the event of a civil war/revolution scenario, the framework and base structure for a UN interference will already be in place. All they need to do, is to make the announcement, and fly in their people and equipment to make it stick. Because it was blessed by Obama, it would be difficult for anyone to object, including the military — unless and until President Trump or some other President revokes the program and so orders, at least.
There is a final ‘conspiracy’ matter which counters the other two, in impact: a secret military within the military. When researching my book, Fatal Rebirth, I was contacted by an active Officer of high rank in the US Military who knew of my work through my appearance on Coast to Coast with George Noory. He advised that there was, within each branch of the service, a secret group of Officers of some importance, and positioned across the full spectrum of unit function (i.e., Intelligence, combat, support, communications, etc.) Their purpose was to be prepared for, on watch for, and to activate should there be any unlawful (unconstitutional) effort to effect a coup or military takeover. He in fact invited me to become a member, as they did have associations with civilian counterparts they deemed useful. Accepting, they said, I would then have access to information he assured me would be valuable to my book.
However, as the covert security aspects of membership were extremely hight, I did not feel I could manage them… and, I was unwilling to accept responsibility for receipt of classified military or governmental information, which would risk being charged with a crime, if caught. But I was pleased that such men were in place to help insure that unlawful orders against citizens would meet with both covert and overt resistance. I reference this covert patriot group as the ‘Turtle,’ (as in, Revenge of the Turtle, America’s first submarine war vessel used in the Revolutionary war. The Turtle is, and like the Turtle sub, is invisible and hard to find, until it bites.
We see then, that the makeup of the current JCS team engineered by Obama, almost exclusively, is quite weighted to Marine and Air Force, suspiciously Deep State tied, and more than mirrors the key aspects of both the 1933 and 1963 scenarios. We see that was an Obama (Democrat) arrangement through a purge, as part of setting up his Deep State. We see that Obama has set the stage for potential UN interference and further partnerships or concessions to authority from the next progressive President to take power. We see that the military and its MIIM Complex, the business sector, and the political spectrum is well laced with both fascist and liberal/progressive politics which border on fascism, and employ fascist tactics. We see that Deep State and establishment politicians collectively ‘hate Trump’ regardless of party affiliation, and in many cases, would rather see the country come to harm than to allow him to continue in office. We see now why the progressives think they own the military, which could in fact be poised for a last-ditch full-blown military coup take over if Trump wins, again.
The final conclusion is, all the pieces are in place, and while the leftists do own the military at the top, they do not, top-down. How then, can we say we are not ripe for a coup, or Revolution 2.0, should the progressives come to power, again — for they still believe they do own the military? Assuming the left does not reform itself into a more logical and viable political entity akin to the old Democratic party of the 1950’s and 60’s, if they cannot be kept from ever again obtaining power, armed conflict must indeed be our future. I foresee no other possible outcome.
Returning to the original question, then, the military is well poised at the command level (JCS) to participate against patriots, but not necessarily well positioned to do so without difficulties, rank and file. We see the Navy and Coast Guard are weak players in such a scenario. We see the Marines, despite any leadership which might be opposed to Patriots, are perhaps the most likely to themselves, at rank and file levels, join with patriots, and refuse unlawful orders. We also see the Turtle groups would do likewise. We see army has its own confusions and situational roadblocks to a unified and obedient command against patriots, tied to the complex relationship with National Guard units. And, we also see the Air force, along with Navy and to a degree, Marines, must be somewhat aloof to such conflict, in order to prevent third-actor States from taking advantage of an American military distracted at home.
I therefore do not see the relatively small numbers of US armed forces, if arrayed against the large number of 2nd Amendment defenders and others of the “former military, militia, patriots, constitutionalists, and the poor and disenfranchised,” being sufficiently strong enough to prevent a patriot victory. That, however, is based on additional assumptions not yet in evidence or proven true: a) that mind control technology will be used effectively; b) that progressives will prove to be better armed and organized than expected; c) that other groups might join in, such as illegal immigrants and Muslims seeing the conflict as a way to advance their own causes, or real or fake UN troops; d) that China (by this means/scenario) or Mexico, perhaps even Canada, might elect to enter into the fray; e) that some other totally unexpected plot element is afoot and impossible to evaluate.
Therefore, if when at bat with an unfriendly pitcher on the Mound, be ready to smack the ball as hard as you can… but also… “Watch out for in your ear,” with a deliberately wild and hurtful pitch (apologies for stealing Ray Liotta’s line).
If you agree… there is yet one more unanswered question: what will the rules of engagement be for patriots, when they will face and odd mix in the battlefield (cities and countryside)? It will be a strange mix of citizens + law enforcement + military on both sides, and in many cases, there will be times when it will not be known which side a combatant force is on. How should such a war be prosecuted? For the answer to that… and in foreseeing this time coming more than 20 years ago… I wrote the book set, Fatal Rebirth. The answers are there, and have been, all along.
Posted in Abuse of Power, Conspiracy, Government, military, News Events, Political Commentary, Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Tags: Constitution, military, military coup, patriots, resolution, takeover, UN troops, UN warehouse, unconstitutional